kgb, he is engaged in anti-terrorist activities. that's it, we have prepared our units for the combat situation. therefore, they could not enter belarus. they saw this, so they turned away and went to the section of the ukrainian-russian border. well , we gave it a little wrong timing, but he said that i will say publicly, any provocation must be stopped by armed means, there is nothing to do. to joke with them, they violated the state border to the point of destruction, no one should be on ceremony with anyone, we will do it anyway, because if we live with snot, they know what will happen, therefore, any violation of the state border is for destruction, they understand only force, so who, who is lukashenko addressing in general, that is, he believes that something threatens the republic of belarus, i think , that it seems to me that he is addressing himself, convincing himself that, well, if... he

is addressing the baltic countries, which are members of nato, then i think belarus is not the kind of army that can threaten there, and the russian army is now completely engaged in battles with us, and any, i don't know, an individual soldier, they are in order to single him out somewhere between belarus, it is necessary, i think, to loosen something somewhere, and everyone understands that, so i think that he is talking to himself, and trying there to show that he has quite a serious army. first of all, we know that belarus is a country that transferred more, first of all, it gave its territories to the use of a foreign army, this already speaks of the loss of sovereignty, if it did not bask there, but full sovereignty, it sold its sovereignty , exchanged his sovereignty with the russian federation, which now influences them, and many tanks, artillery, training grounds were transferred to the russian federation, so now you are busy with ... destruction, well, everyone

understands what modern war is, i think that belarus is seriously no one without russia perceives mr. colonel, how do you assess the possibility that belarus and russia can go back to breaking through this suval corridor between belarus and kaliningrad, and still come to break through this corridor with it, because this fragment of the video that we saw is it was just at the border. between belarus and lithuania, and lukashenko dressed up, you see, he had some shoots there, some camouflage, look, we do not rule it out now, yes, the world has moved in another direction, we see, russia has shown that it is possible to solve issues by military means , and the world has not yet fully recovered, and we see with the help that comes to us and delays, the russians see that...

there is no such a clear answer to this, that you can drag there, you can stretch what you gave on the air , what is possible, they have enough resources, so look, they have to understand one thing: if ukraine loses, if they will not help us, then what you say is quite real, because russia understands, they also have analysts, but will nato enter the war, for example , for some small baltic countries, we already went through this during the second world war. you remember, at that time there was also , let's say, the league of nations and other issues that guaranteed something to someone, but they closed their eyes to poland, they closed their eyes to czechoslovakia at that time, and also to lithuania, latvia, estonia, although for poland at that time we remember what guarantees were very serious, and as a result , what this led to, now europe has the opportunity to step on the same rake, and only the fact that ukraine has contacted itself is meant , to resist and got caught and

did not give russia the opportunity to advance and carry out the operations that it wanted, now it gives them the opportunity to behave like this, in a different situation, i am sure, they would already be in hostilities, or they would tell each other , why it is necessary to resolve all this peacefully and agreeing not to occupy some of the baltic countries there, this is a fact, we understand it, it’s just that someone does not want to admit it, thank you, colonel, for the... language, it was roman kostenko, a colonel of the security service of ukraine, a people’s deputy of ukraine . friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms on youtube and facebook, and during this broadcast we are conducting a poll, we are asking you about whether it is necessary to increase responsibility for corruption during the war. everything is quite simple on youtube, yes, no, if you, watch us on tv pick up your smartphone or phones and vote if you think there should be increased accountability for wartime corruption 0800 211 381 no 0800 211 382 all calls to

these numbers are free vote at the end of the program we let's sum up the results of this vote. next, we have ivan stupak in touch. military expert, former employee of the security service of ukraine. mr. ivan, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations studios, thank you for the invitation. so, mr. ivan, russia accuses ukraine of involvement in terrorism and the commission of a terrorist attack in the moscow suburbs in krok city hall. what consequences can this have for ukraine, russia's efforts to translate from a healthy head or from a sick one. head to health and stand in front of the world in the role of a victim, and ukraine to ukraine to say that it is the aggressor. ukraine, they want to turn ukraine into a country of terrorists, terrorists, who can do what they like in the end, that's all that ukraine is, it

bombs civilian cities of the russian federation, fires at the civilian population, terrorizes, and the main goal is to rid ukraine. help from in general, political, diplomatic , economic, financial, and most importantly , the last thing is that the ammunition does not go to ukraine, and then everything will be much better for russia, they are ready to put not 130 people for this purpose , but 1000-300, 13 00 russians, i want them to do it, well , they can put 400 thousand people, as they did it from the beginning, i mean peace, not on the front line, on the front line it goes without saying, of course. russia is the number one terrorist country and putin is the number one terrorist in the world, and this has already been recorded officially recorded, since he is the only president in the world who has an arrest warrant from the international criminal court and is actually only waiting for his arrest, but

at the same time, this version, which putin was building together with bortnikov and various patrushevs there , that ukraine has a relationship, that there there was a window. opportunities for these terrorists to come to ukraine, of course, this is a complete delusion and, by the way, this was confirmed by the belarusian dictator oleksandr lukashenko, who completely refuted this version of the russians that they wanted to cross the russian-ukrainian border border, that they came from russian-belarusian territory, let's listen to what lukashenko said. they understood that it is not possible to enter belarus, because in the first minutes, when russia transferred the regions to... the security regime was strengthened, and so is ours. in the first minutes , the head of the kgb reported to me that he is engaged in anti-terrorist measures. that's it, we have prepared our units for the combat situation. therefore, they could not enter belarus. they saw this, so

they turned away and went to the ukrainian-russian border area. mr. ivan, absolutely it is obvious that... for the united states of america, for great britain, for other countries that have good and good intelligence, including good special services, this is what putin and his team say, what the separatists say in principle looks like as a delusion, and for whom can this be an argument? yes, for countries that take an openly pro-russian position, an anti-western position, i am not talking about ukraine, there to ukraine they can support... it is different, here the main confrontation is along the line, the countries of the west and all the rest of the countries that are not support western countries, for them, for example, venezuela, iran, north korea, well, i am very surprised, why kimchenina's sister has not yet made a statement, and

the russian propaganda machine has not yet cited that she condemns the criminal terrorist attack by ukraine, western special services, despite everything that the united states for... more than, well, in almost three weeks , they announced two weeks that it will be in two weeks to announce that there is such a danger, but i did not laugh at something, they were offended, they said, this is how you are trying to disrupt our elections, you trying to manipulate, well, in general, you carry the sword there, well, okay, it’s been a little more than two weeks there and immediately the accusations of the other guy, you didn’t warn us well, you should have warned us better, and now look at what an interesting story: if the united states does not made public this information, then after this terrorist attack, the russian federation would simply , i don't know what it was doing there, it would tear itself apart and shout that the west did not warn them, and any evidence of the united states that we

sent to you, the russians say: "no, you are nothing were not directed, you are behind this terrorist attack and so on and so forth." well, by the way, the spokesman for the united states department of state. america matthew miller denies the statement of the head of the federal security service of the russian federation, oleksandr bortnikov, that apparently ukraine and the united states the united states of america . great britain was involved in this terrorist attack. let's hear what he has to say. we made it very clear that there is no evidence that ukraine was involved. because ukraine was not involved. i would say that these comments are from russian officials persons, including president putin, is just propaganda to justify their further aggression against ukraine. it is absolutely obvious that in this story, a continuation, a possible continuation of terrorist attacks from the side and works, which

may well be, as far as this, it can be a powerful factor in order to destabilize the situation inside the russian federation, because the fsb and all the special services of the russian federation are concentrated in ukraine, and it is obvious that what happened happened for a reason and... whether the fsb was involved in it or not, it is difficult to say, but idil says that we did it, to what extent they can resort to some repeated similar actions in order to prove that in the field of terrorists, world terrorists, they are just as important and fulfill their role in the same way as russia, by the way, a great question , look, literally two words to your previous thesis. answered when the russians say, well , it's ukraine, it's the united states, great britain, well, it's clear what they

're doing, but it's very interesting and enlightening in the last day, as kirmanych from the fsb, patrushev, the secretary of the security council, declared that it's ukraine, the director of the fsb says that this is ukraine, we are currently working on the evidence base, we are looking for it, we have experience, that is, it simply means the conditions, if you explain why, when they say , we are working on it, the evidence base, we record it there, it means , that... in emergency mode, in emergency mode, they are trying to create artificial evidence, conditionally email correspondence, some ukrainian sim cards are thrown, which have not been seen before, plus those people who are now locked up in prison, well, these shooters, we saw in what form they came to the court, just in a vegetable state, just like vegetables, i think they're working with them now with different chemicals, psychotropic substances, and maybe we'll be able to there on... like, i don't know, there in a week, two, a half, i don't know how long to see some confessions, that in

fact they were not led by idols, but i don’t know, british special services, people with a british accent, with an american accent, with a ukrainian accent, polish, it doesn’t matter, that is, now there is such a period of forming the evidence base to blame ukraine, but the time in this case plays exclusively against the russians, now answering your question about the possibility of a terrorist attack, personally... my assessment is that it is 90 percent likely that in a fairly short period of time, we can see something, well, something, some kind of manifestation and action in the russian federation, so they are now in in the russian federation, shopping centers and concerts are very carefully guarded, they set up metal detectors, the police will stand with the dogs, or the police with the dogs, or the dog with the police. er special forces will be everywhere, but usually the special services are preparing for

terrorist attacks that have already taken place, a new terrorist attack , it can be in a completely different location, in a completely different place, it's not important, i don't know there, subway, airport, replacement plane, whatever, i think that idil will show himself purely on principle , that ah yes, they didn't believe the wine, ah, that's how you treated those people who did it, there they cut off the ear, there they plugged it up. genital wires, we will show you, that is, i personally expect that there may be the next terrorist attack, possibly a double one. mr. ivan, in parallel with this , xenophobic sentiments are unfolding in russia, regarding the tajiks, in relation to the kyrgyz there, and also in relation to other nationalities, more than 120 nations and nationalities live and work in the russian federation, how much is this a factor in the fact that... xenophobia can simply cover the russian federation and provoke, including by force

, some clashes of security forces, russian security forces with those peoples and nationalities that live in the russian federation, and as russians who believe that all tajiks are to blame for this, turkmens are to blame for this, kazakhs are to blame for this or who else, well that is... to what extent this factor is national may blow up russia? oh, a difficult question , look, yes, there really is such an attitude towards all the inhabitants of the countries of central asia, tajikistan, uzbekistan, well, the russians don’t distinguish them at all, they don’t care, i won’t call this the word they use, well, words, or rather, they have one attitude , i.e. you don't look like a slav, i.e. everything, you are bad, about the inhabitants of the north caucasus, they are afraid to say this, so it is very likely that if that terrorist attack is the next , it will not be committed by the inhabitants, well natives of the countries of central asia, or perhaps

i don't know, somehow different to african countries, for example, that is, something completely different will be different, for the first time. in turn, such xenophobic manifestations concern citizens who are not citizens of the russian federation, who work illegally in construction , clean the streets, well, they perform service services, and i don’t know there, there is a large retail network, searches are currently taking place there, where do citizens of middle-class countries work of asia, that is, the russian federation may hypothetically face such a problem as a shortage, or a big... problem with labor force, and now the russians really do not have enough people there in certain areas, and if these people go to their countries, if they leave the russian federation, then i can roughly predict certain, well, not social upheavals, but economic upheavals, i don’t i say that they will be something, something big , something large-scale, but very unpleasant for the russians, well, for now, it is such a black

swan to say that, for example, i don't know, the citizens of turkmenistan will become, will fight with the russian policemen. we yes, locally it can be, but so that they began to fight and shout slogans: we are going to moscow, we are going to the kremlin, well, i think not, although in the grand scheme of things everything can be, beyond any doubt, it has happened many times in russian history that something seemingly insignificant, but turned into a significant more, but meanwhile our special services are trying to work with russian territory, with russian oil refineries. by factories , strike drones fly at different distances and reach the target, that is, the gas station country is gradually losing this gas station status, and it is clear that these are sufficiently painful blows for of the russian federation, there they talk about 13 or 20% of these capacities that were hit by ukrainian drones, what the consequences

could be for russia, these strikes and how much this is our struggle... the drone struggle will have devastating consequences for, including the current regime of putin , so let's be very careful in this area, hypothetically , everything looks good, that is, the destruction of oil refineries, that is, it does not apply to oil production, it specifically applies to the processing of oil into diesel fuel, gasoline, aviation kerosene, marine fuel, fuel oil there and much, much more. the other, that is, it does not concern production itself, as the united states hinted that you ukrainians can provoke an increase in oil prices, that is, these are unrelated stories. now, as far as we know, belarus has joined the refining of oil products for the needs of the russian federation, there were large numbers, volumes, not bad. according to preliminary estimates,

approximately 14% of the oil refining capacities of the russian federation were named. destroyed or damaged, so far there is no cumulative effect, we it has not been seen, so there are still a small number of such processing enterprises within a radius of 1000 km from ukraine, they are still somehow working there, either at full capacity or partially working, that is, they have not yet reached them, plus, unfortunately, there are opportunities in russia, there are there are some kind of warehouses, stocks with fuel, and they are slowly starting to open them, unpack them and use them on their own market, that is, there is no such effect yet, of course we wanted to see as soon as possible, plus now the russians will start sowing, would like to disrupt it, but i think that specialists in the oil industry in particular can tell you in more detail when that result can be expected and whether it will be there at all, because this is really such a very delicate field, and

one must be very careful with estimates here, thank you, mr. ivan, it was ivan stupak, military expert, ex. an employee of the security service of ukraine, friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms in youtube and facebook, and in parallel we are conducting a survey, today we are asking you about the following, do we need to strengthen the accountability for corruption in wartime , it's pretty simple on youtube, yes no, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you think this accountability for corruption should be strengthened, 0800 211 381, no 0800 211 382. all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we have oleksandr kraev, an expert of the ukrainian prism foreign policy council, on the air. mr. oleksandr, i am you. greetings, glad to see you in our air. yes, congratulations, first of all, first of all , mr. oleksandr, i would like to start our conversation with the situation where putin is trying

to take over and russia is trying to take over the role of the victim after the terrorist attack in the suburbs of moscow, when they are trying to accuse ukraine of being involved in terrorism, and in this way, i understand, putin thought that a window of opportunity would open for him. in order to restore contacts with the president of the united states of america , joseph biden. why, after all, this story that happened in croc city hall is not no opened up these opportunities for putin, why both american and british officials, well, they talk about it so cautiously and are in no hurry to lend a hand to putin in the fight against international terrorism. first, ours. after all, a lot has happened lately, primarily because the russians cannot be trusted , and the restoration of normal relations with the russians, no matter how difficult it may be, is

still an impossible scenario, even in such a seemingly global issue as the fight against international terrorism, in addition, all that this was done by russia, the way it conducted the investigation, the way it provided information, the way it cooperated in principle with the western states, showed that this is all pretentious propaganda, that this is all an attempt to... dig an enemy, it is an attempt to find the guilty where they are no , this is an attempt to really put even more accusations on ukraine for what ukraine did not do, that is, russian propaganda gave slack here and did not really show a clear narrative, russian propaganda could not be constant in its narrative, and therefore the story, that they were allegedly going to ukraine, as it turned out later, they were going to belarus, that they were allegedly cooperating with the ukrainian special services, which they could not prove normally. and even the very format of the detention of these terrorists indicated that for russia it is primarily a powerful tool of propaganda, but this propaganda

could not create a clear narrative, and luckily for us, the event simply did not lead to this. mr. oleksandr, just a week ago, senator linsich graham was in kyiv, and he said that he intends to to initiate the adoption in the united states of america of a bill to recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism and... and so it happened that this tragedy simply unfolded a week after graham visited kyiv, or will it happen against this background, against the background of anti-terrorist rhetoric of the current kremlin, will the united states of america go so far as to declare russia a sponsor, a sponsor of terrorism, a state sponsor of terrorism, although of course russia is a terrorist state. just a sponsor of terrorism, actually here there are a lot of questions, and whether it is necessary, because the topic of whether to declare a state sponsor of terrorism

has been on the agenda in the united states for a long time, and the key argument why it was not done earlier, because it did not in principle carry b some great additional added value, because the status of a state sponsor of terrorism, which at one time was in syria, and in iraq, which was in libya, which was in... some parts of the bloc in general, which supports india and iran, and these this status provides a certain set of sanctions, c first of all, these are sanctions on the military-industrial complex, these are economic sanctions, this is a ban on the issuance of new visas, this is the cancellation of existing visas, that is, in fact , this is a certain sanctions package, which is called such an interesting, wonderful word as the state sponsor of terrorism, plus this for the seizure of assets abroad, all the persecution of the powerful of this country, that is, all that is already being done against russia in principle, and that is why the americans always had such a clear,

clear, clear question, why should we do what is already being done, and especially if you take into account that the sanctions regime against russia has long since become much broader than it is against a state sponsor of terrorism. if we are talking about a terrorist state, there is currently no such definition in american legislation, and it would be much clearer. a much clearer term, because russia does not sponsor terrorism, russia itself creates terrorism, the fact that there is state-level terrorism is a long-proven axiom of international relations, but unfortunately, neither the usa nor other western countries have yet such article in the legislation, such an incriminating article that it could be attributed to russia. in just the last few weeks , we have been witnessing how strike drones are trying to destroy an oil refinery. the industry of the russian federation last week, the financial times wrote an article about what washington is trying

to contain. ukrainians and the ukrainian authorities from strikes on oil refining facilities of the russian federation, to what extent is the probability that this is actually the case, i.e. both and and it may be that the americans are afraid of rising oil prices there, although of course there are oil refineries and crude oil , there is a difference between the extraction, oil extraction industry and the processing industry, in fact. indeed , as we saw later from the reaction to this material, and as we saw from the reaction to the alleged words of jake sullivan that ukraine should stop such strikes, as they like to say, everything is not so clear, both the pentagon and the state department, and even the white house staff said that sullivan was misunderstood, and actually stated in the vein of what let's not hit the russian refineries, the sullivans turned out to be such an unpleasant situation for them with a misunderstanding, they decided to take the old

position and not support, but... prohibit, but at the same time the clear position of the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, regarding the russian dictator vladimir putin , he called him a butcher. we remember that in the 21st year, after he met putin in geneva, he called him a murderer, well, he confirmed it, answering a journalist's question. now during the pre-election event in severniya karolina, he proposed to introduce, he means biden by... 25% on the incomes of billionaires, in order to direct these funds to help ukraine. let's hear what biden said. this would raise $400 billion over the next 10 years. imagine what we could do with them. we could dramatically reduce the federal deficit, we could provide home care, and so much more. in particular, to finally protect ukraine from this butcher putin.

listen, i see a future where we save the planet from the climate crisis and ours the country from gun violence, mr. alexander, well, the main thing here is not that he called him a butcher or a butcher there, but the main thing is that he proposes to introduce a 25 percent tax on billionaires to direct these funds to aid. won't there be a backlash when these billionaires say, well, listen, you still want to impose an additional tax on us, and they will also start promoting their narratives there, they will say, we will not help ukraine, because it is not at all clear, why they are stripping us again, well i.e. billionaires, they are billionaires in all countries and do not want to share what they have earned, what is chasing biden and what reaction might those who really have money in

the united states of america have, first of all, ukraine was far from the first on the list of what biden wants to do with these funds. ukraine was one of the options where he wants to spend these funds and how he wants to use them. secondly, this idea is not new. this idea has been promoted in the democratic party for the past few election cycles. and she changed quite seriously the last 10 years. it all started with a basic tax of 1% for everyone who has more than 1 million dollars a year in wealth, profit, more precisely. and now it even works out. 25 % of taxes for billionaires and those who are actively leaving the status of a millionaire, but have not yet become a billionaire, that is, this issue has been in the democratic party for a long time, it is not something new , it is aimed at ukraine or something that was taken from the air, third, we see rather not that now billionaires will start reacting negatively to this new biden policy, we see other trends, we see that ukrainian issues...