was observed, so that's why, that's why here the question is rather to, everyone, everyone tries to protect what he considers his own, yes or defend, so here the question is obviously according to bolgakov, as it seems to me, it is very close to the question of how india remembers kipling, so , because kipling was born in india, as was bolgakov in ukraine. but again , kipling for india remains a vivid expression of the culture of the colonizers. similarly , bulgakov is for ukrainians, he is an example of just such a colonialist culture, for which ukrainians remained second-class people. tell me what, from your point of view, should be done now with the bolgakov museum, because it is one of the most popular museums, every time i was there there were an incredible number of... people

, and i must say that the workers who gave tours, everyone once, i was there several times, maybe again, every time they talked about this author with admiration, as it is observed in many museums, when the employees love their ward very much, and as far as i understand, it is planned that the museum change its name and that about pulgakov was told objectively there, that he necessarily this museum. remained, it should not be closed under any circumstances, do you think it is possible to somehow stimulate people who love and respect this writer with all their hearts, to talk about him more objectively, or how it should all happen, in fact, the question is with the bolgakov museum , it actually appeared and gave impetus in 2022, and now the museum really works on... this

concept, and this is a big plus, but we can, for example, this is also an indicator and an example, right? until the 22nd year , the museum had a memorial plaque on which it was it is written that bulgakov is russian, a famous russian writer, so in 23, 22, it was dismantled, in 23, instead, it appeared. the memorial plaque, which already states that bulgakov is a kyiv writer, and that is why, even in this, we see already some kind of transformation of the understanding and representation of bolgakov, it seems to me that the process of rethinking the figure will obviously take place, and it is obvious that the museum, the change the concept of the museum, changing approaches will allow everyone to look at this

figure more objectively, tell us more about the arch of friendship peoples, because i already foresee that there may be the same uproar as with this motherland, and you propose to demolish this structure altogether, as one that cannot be renamed, so that some concept will be preserved, tell me about it and what you expect general reaction, well, again, the experts who worked, who studied this issue, came to the conclusion that this monumental object, which includes not only the arch, but also the corresponding sculptures, some of which have already been dismantled, and some are hidden it forms a complete object and it is obvious that it was created from a form. and existed as

a certain integral memorial object, as a propaganda tool that promoted this imperial narrative about the friendship of peoples, and therefore it is not surprising that it is known in kyiv, this object is also known under such a popular name as yarmov , and, therefore, attempts to transform it, they also acquire a certain kind of inexplicable form, so earlier eh... a crack was put on this arch, so as the symbolism of the fact that friendship gave a crack, in 2022 the arch was renamed the arch of stability of the ukrainian people, and what we got in our country, so we got the arch of stability of the ukrainian people with a crack, whether it is good, whether it is, whether it is a solution to the problem, whether it is only, whether it does not complicate perception, so it is obvious that ... that a simple

renaming of the question of the arch, or the question of this monument, in which the honor of the so- called reunification is established, is that of ukraine. russia, it is not resolved, and therefore it is obvious that the question of the connection is needed here, that this is the symbol of russian imperial policy, until it is necessary to remove him, her from the public space when do you think this removal can take place, and approximately how much will it cost, and where can this arch be taken to later, put on a sheet metal or where? well, we are dealing with the conclusion so far. experts, it is obvious that this needs to be worked out, as well as working out the issue of further existence, and what will happen in this space, here obviously a joint joint dialogue of the community and the city government and

both the government and the state is needed in order to find the best optimal solution, especially considering , which today is under military conditions it will become obvious that there are... other priorities for public funds, well, tell me, please, during your work there or during, for example, a full-scale invasion, let's even take this period, do you think society has become bigger, understand various renamings, decommunization, these are such different transformations, because i remember that at the beginning, well, according to my observations, at the beginning of a full-scale invasion there was. there were a lot more dissenters, and now, again, in my opinion, society has become a little radicalized, as you see it, or, well, maybe they watched on social networks, in fact, the large-scale invasion significantly accelerated

this process of rethinking our past, because in fact it became clear to all ukrainians that russia seeks to destroy the ukrainian identity. that what was imposed in ukraine for decades was done with a propagandistic purpose, with the purpose of elevating russian culture over ukrainian, with the purpose of discrediting ukrainian culture and ukrainian identity, that is why streets and monuments were an almost mandatory element in our cities opponents of pushkin to other russians actors have time not connected with these cities, and therefore it is not surprising that with the beginning of a large-scale invasion, these processes of change and understanding and support of the processes of saying goodbye to the empire, they accelerated, they are present in all regions, all, today

in all regions the process of renaming streets is actively taking place , the dismantling of monuments, so eh... indeed, this is a high price for us to rethink the past, but if, if it did not sound terrible, but really a large-scale invasion accelerated the changes in the public consciousness of the ukrainian. sir volodymyr, i thank you very much for your comments, we had volodymyr telishchak, the deputy head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance, on the air, we talked in particular about... how the bolgakov institute forbids, it's scary, well, i'll repeat it again, friends, you can relate in different ways, yes, to this writer, but the institute of national remembrance did not ban mykhailo bolgakov, you definitely need to know that, they will not

take away your books, it is just about renaming streets, for example, and something like that, so if you like lyrics this author, please, you still can. read it further, and it seems to me that it is quite democratic in our case, and regarding the bolgakovo museum, personally, i will be very interested to go there and see how the concept of this museum will change, how it will be rebuilt, because there is really very interesting excursions, if they remain as interesting, but will become more objective... they will tell more unpleasant truth about blogakov, i think that the museum will only benefit, and i also want to note an important point, it is about such non-objective position and non-objective vision, mm, and if we talk about many other museums,

for example, in the tychyna museum in kyiv, it seems to me that there is also a lot of disagreement about such an interesting person with an incredibly bright... ambiguous life and actions, well, because they obviously love their author and do not want to show anything bad about him, but by this very thing... the charisma of these writers decreases many times, and they become uninteresting, and this seems to me to be absolutely such a soviet practice, when we we make of famous people such heroes, idealized, emasculated, as a rule, such heroes do not find a response in the hearts of different people, and therefore they are not loved, they are not interested in them, and therefore, probably, it is generally false. position, as in any positioning of our prominent people. by the way, in may

, a film called the endless novel by taras tomenko will be released, and this film tells about those writers, who later we began to call the shot revival, and there, in my opinion, this is an attempt to show that the same wavy, not an ideal person with his moments. and in general, that period was, in my opinion, very, very controversial, because these writers sincerely supported the soviet government, but then what happened happened, and finally, i will say the following about the same bulgakov, because i am really watching now there is their feed on social networks, especially people who are active on facebook, somehow instagram, twitter less discuss this decision of the institute of national remembrance, many people pogo'. with this conclusion, and with this decision, and a lot people do not, and in many posts i see,

again, about these bans, people, well, either the representatives of the institute of national remembrance did not explain it well, or people did not read it, maybe we are reading from the headlines again, but it still seems to me that that this incredible sentiment is specifically for bulgakov, it was precisely developed during the times in the soviet union, when this writer... especially there in the late times was very supported, cultivated very much, you remember that there are also very popular tapes based on his works, it's not only a dog's heart, ivan vasyliovych is also changing it profession, many people don't know it because of bolgakov's play, and these films, these books are extremely widely cited, master margarita is widely cited, and this citation always adds to works of art on... nationalism and greater influence, and i i am very pleased that now ukrainian cinema is appearing, which is also

getting these quotations, they quote, for example, dovbush, phrases, or they quote antony lukich's film, they quote something else, and even say for a wedding, they quote, that's good, and therefore we have such a picture that gradually we are replacing our art, our mass culture... and russian culture, so it seems to me that the process is going very well and in the right direction. well, friends, that's all i say goodbye to, and stay with espresso, and we 'll see you in a week. there are 10% discounts on eurofast softcaps. travel book, memory and savings. the premium sponsor of the national team represents.

united by football, stronger together. the football format changes the time of airing. from now on, you can immerse yourself in the atmosphere of football every monday. at 10:00 p.m. professional match analysis, exclusive interviews, goals, highlights, emotions, project for experienced fans as well as for people who appreciate a non-committal view of football, football format every monday at 22:00 on espresso tv channel. an unusual look at the news, good health ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresen, sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. and in america. we will have a special look at the events in , they also say, let's make better roads, even better

some katsaps, and beyond it, what kind of world ukraine, on the border of kyiv will be dreams, parman, we can imagine it, everything it's in an informational marathon with mykola in september, saturday 5:10 p.m., sunday 6:15 p.m. at espresso. congratulations, simple. your help in searching for three children from the kherson region, they are diana kobzar, vitya azarov and angelina fadeeva. and now in a little more detail. so, 15-year-old diana disappeared in the village. lazurne in the skadovsky district of the kherson region. it happened on january 1, 2023, and since then , unfortunately, nothing is known about the girl. now the azure is temporarily occupied, and therefore the search process is, of course, very complicated, but i am asking each of you, and especially the residents azure, look closely at diana's face.

if you recognize her or have any information about her, please let me know. to the hotline at 11630. if you do not have the opportunity to call, you can write to us on the website or in the chatbot of the children's search service in telegram. and i note that there is no secondary information for the search, any data, any little thing is important and can even become decisive and ultimately help find the missing child. 17-year-old vitya azarov also disappeared in kherson oblast and during the occupation. connection broke up with the boyfriend on january 19, 2023, and since then there is no news about him. he disappeared on the left bank of the kherson region, namely in the kakhov district, in the village of gornostaivka. and this is angelina fadeeva. she is also from the kherson region, namely from the city of kherson. she

'15. nothing is known about the girl since february 24, 2024. under what...circumstances she disappeared is currently unknown, in particular, due to the fact that diana kobzar, vitya azarov, and angelina fadeeva disappeared during the occupation, information about them, unfortunately, is scarce. and so, in fact, very much i hope for you, for your attentiveness and care. we really hope that the children are all right and that you will help us find them. so, if you know anything about these children, please contact the hotline immediately. children's search service, our number is 116 30. let's not be indifferent and let's try together to find the missing diana, vitya and angelina. in fact, finding children from temporarily occupied territories is a very difficult and usually long process, but our experience shows that the search must continue even in the most difficult, or it seemed, sometimes

hopeless situations. so, for example, we were able to find a guy, by the way, also from the then still occupied part of the kherson region, who was wanted by his relatives and could not get in touch with him. nothing was known about igor since february 24, 2022. we only knew that he lived in the village of sonyachne, kherson region, which was under occupation. in our programs, we called on the residents of this village, if they still see us on the internet, to let us know if possible. 17-year-old igor lives in soniachny and is he okay, and it worked, we were sent this video with igor, let's take a look. my name is igor, today is october 31, 2022, i live in serizochny, kherson region with my grandfather and grandmother. everything is fine, i have no ukrainian connection, as i live

in the occupation of the occupied territory. the guy confirmed that he still lives in the village of sonyachne together with... his grandparents and everything is fine with him, but all this time he could not report himself, because there was no one in the occupation of ukrainian mobile communications. i really hope that the search stories of diana kobzar, vita azarov and angelina fadeeva, which i told at the beginning, will end with the same happy ending, so once again i ask you not to remain indifferent and join the search. i also encourage you to visit the site. child tracing services, here are photos of all the boys and girls we are trying to find, take just a few minutes of your time, look at the photos of the children, look at their faces, maybe you will recognize one of them and help find them, suddenly in if you have any information about any of these children, call the hotline of the

child tracing service 11630, calls from all mobile operators in ukraine are free. and we, having finished they went to look for a new house and found a green house and a room in a dark grove, in meadows, in wide steppes, in huts, steep, deep... there is a house everywhere.

this is a new series of documentaries. of the strykha project, and this time we want to tell you about what we found while traveling through central ukraine, namely, amazing hundred-year-old windmills, restored mazankas of poltava region and the outskirts of kyiv, and unique, imbued with folk culture, ukrainian modern. the end of the 19th century in general in the european world, this is a departure from po'. first, the classical models, greek, roman, or their essential revision, and departure from historicisms, and that is, each, each country began to develop its own approaches to what

it should be. indeed, the fashion for the italian renaissance, neo-baroque, neo-gothic, at one time filled all the european cities of that time and made them similar to each other. then young architects began to look for new individual styles. i got this style the name modern, or arnovo, new art, this is the beginning of the 20th century, this is a huge elevation of the ukrainian idea, this is already the appearance of ukrainian political parties, rapid development is reaching, ukrainian literature, ukrainian painting, ukrainian music, ukrainian theater, this is this elevation, this is necessary it was just a feeling. on the territory of ukraine , the question actually arose as to what this should be. global trend arnuvo, can it take some elements of traditional ukrainian architecture. the question was

whether ukrainian architecture even exists ukrainian culture outside the village and outside the church, because in general, such a doctrine at that time was that ukrainian architecture is peasant, ukrainian culture is peasant, and it did not manifest itself further than the baroque churches of the 17th century, the beginning of the 18th century. and it was precisely with this thesis that architects began to struggle. the building of the poltava provincial zemstvo is the main business card of ukrainian modernity and the city of poltava. but at the beginning of the 20th century, the implementation of this unique project in a completely new at that time style hung in volosk. first higher the leadership from moscow imposed a design typical of the russian empire at that time in style. pseudo-renaissance and despite resistance from the representatives of the zemstvo themselves, construction began in 1901, but

it was stopped within a few years. the majority of the zemstvo voted that the project needed to be replaced, and finally in 1903, when construction was already underway, that is, the perimeter of the building was already determined, the construction of walls began, construction was frozen, a competition for the project was announced, a new project, well, that is rudely say... that it was a project of facades, because the plan was already more or less established. six projects were submitted to the competition, among which was the project of 30-year-old vasyl krychevskyi. at that time, he worked as the chief assistant of the very famous kharkiv architect oleksiy beketov. krychevskyi had a lot of practical experience. in addition, he traveled a lot in the villages of the present-day kharkiv region, sumy region, and poltava region, and explored ancient churches. chewed the arrangement and decoration of ancient houses, which colors were used, which ornaments were used, which carvings, what materials were used.

the jury of the competition included the artist serhii vasylkivskyi, known from kharkov, he knew krychevskyi, and of course he understood that krychevskyi was their hope now to show something radically different. krychevskyi's bold project was also supported by the well-known ethnographer and architect opanas slastion. although the other members of the jury were not yet ready for experiments in a new style. when the question arose about krychevsky's project, from the first there were two votes against six for it, but after the speech of slastion himself, to him listened, and in the end karachevsky's project won, and now we see a priceless masterpiece of the ukrainian style in poltava, it's incredible, it's ours, it's our treasure. today , the building of the poltava zemstvo operates as the krychevsky museum of local history. walking through its halls, you can not only marvel at the scale of the implemented urban architecture project,

but also see hundreds of references to folk architecture and decoration, which previously did not go beyond the village. regarding the references, yes, they are so general, they are not specific object, yes, these are general types of objects, this is a wooden church, clearly, we see this in the towers, we see this in the general inclination of the walls, the external facade, if you look closely, they are slightly inclined, they are not vertical, so that they refer in this way to wooden churches, which were built in this way from the foundations of stability, but it gave them enormous... beauty, slenderness, and this slenderness is translated by krychevsky here, it was very difficult, to be honest, the builders did not want it to do, they wanted to make everything easier, but krychevsky insisted that it is very important, it is also a traditional house, but the house is not an ordinary house, but a wealthy house, the red stripe that runs along the main facade, this is again from the tradition of painting with red ocher,

painting the walls of ukrainian houses... that's why he brings this example to this building. the shape of the roofs of the house of the poltava zemstvo is an uneven triangle, as well as a characteristic slope of the roof, also a tribute to the ukrainian tradition. this is precisely an attribute more characteristic of the slavic, including mostly ukrainian building tradition, and its it is not there conventionally in northern europe, here we have dealt with specialists, architects, who come and say that you have such roofs, but we have not seen such, so this is characteristic personally. just for them, they immediately distinguish it, and of course, buildings in the ukrainian arnovo style can be easily recognized by their hexagonal windows and spiers. in the building of the poltava zemstvo , the spiers are topped with symbols of the sun. they were very common both in religious and civil architecture of the 17th and 18th centuries. if it was a civilian building, hers it was not possible to crown it with some cossack

cross. it was crowned with radiance, it is somehow a symbol of elevation, a symbol of progress, a symbol of development, it was extremely important, separately, i would still note the importance of ornaments, such as the tree of life, but it is constantly present, the use of a ceramic facade is not traditional , we do not have such examples of all-ceramic ones, but we know about their use in ukrainian churches of the ukrainian baroque, cossack baroque period as well. ceramic decor on the facades, we know about the huge practice of spreading the use of ceramic tiles in the decoration of interiors, and stoves, and parts of other premises, and krychevsky brings this tradition outside, that is, this is not banality, it is not a vlob, it is not just an enlarged house , an enlarged church, this is not an enlarged hetman's tenement house, he interprets it very competently, patriotism was brought up in elements, in

details, so there between the first and second tier are the coats of arms of the counties of the poltava province, and there are lubnys, and there and peryatyn, there and viper an important feature of modernity in architecture was locality, both of the materials themselves and of handicrafts. to implement the project , the architects involved individual local craftsmen and entire local industries. ceramic coats of arms were produced by the myrhorod art and industrial school. mental eyes, all the compositions were made by opyushna masters, separately there were orders for wood carvings, we can see it on the doors as well, these are the carved products inside, these are the carvings of the balconies in the main hall, reinforced concrete is used, which makes this building very modern, a lot metal constructions, that is , serious industrial productions and artisan craftsmen worked here, and we can see this especially in

the ceramic decoration of this. courtyard entrance, these tiles that are there, they are significantly different from the others, they are more folk, more irregular, somewhat chaotic, because specifically, again , krychevsky wanted to give an opportunity to present the entire range of these individual masters who make such naive art, it is also represented here, so this building is not it simply became a visual example of some ukrainian ornaments, symbols, colors, and so on. and she also gave work to all these industrial productions, which at that time were not in the best condition, because industry gradually displaced all the national productions. the building of the poltava zemstvo not only reflected the general european architectural processes of arnovo's development, but also personified that frantic inner life.