and another thing, they consider kyiv a branch of the washington regional committee, its subdivision, it's all together, they are fighting the west through ukraine. another thing is that ukraine has an independent interest, because ukraine, that is why such a war is impossible, for example with kazakhstan, because it is important for moscow to defeat such an alternative, a slavic more western one, in order to show that the slavs cannot live apart from as in the pan-slavic space, which is moscow. personifies the slavs of the former ussr, primarily ukraine, cannot become part of the western anglo-saxon world. otherwise, it will demonstrate an example that without wars you can live normally, even well, take care of your own country, without having aggressive plans from the outside, because this is exactly what will happen to ukraine if it joins the eu and nato. and where should ukraine direct aggression, why? there is no such idea. it is the prevention that is possible. integration into the west of ukraine,

ultimately this war is such a tool, in the end, of course, against the western values ​​of the west, in general, moscow is fighting. thank you very much, mark, for this extremely interesting and informative conversation, i wish to our viewers to remind that mark fegin, a figure of the russian position on emigration, a former member of the state duma, a well-known video blogger, was currently working on spress. riv is a leading manufacturer of windowsills and materials for windows. riv, we have been creating quality at an affordable price for more than 20 years. there are discounts on glicised and glicised max 15% in pharmacies plantain you and save. the premium sponsor of the national team represents. united

by football, stronger together. there is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. we are engaged in propaganda, russia is throwing millions of petrodollars to transform ukrainians to little russians. ukraine will become russia, we are countering russian information attacks in the chronicles of information war project with olga. well, now oleg rybachuk, former head of the secretariat of president viktor yushchenko, former vice-prime minister for the european integration of ukraine, and co-founder of the honest glory to ukraine movement, will work on the espresso tv channel, mr. oleg, congratulations, glory to the heroes, an extremely serious earthquake in office the president has a number of

leading specialists in various positions with different biographies and different histories of relationships with volodymyr zelenskyi were removed from their positions, this case was preceded by the resignation of the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine oleksiy danilov, so some explanations were made there in connection with the transfer to a more, so to speak, suitable position, so as it turned out the head diplomat' representative office in moldova. well, actually, i don't perceive it at all as some kind of tsunami, it's something like that, a light spring breeze, shefir, trofimov, well, these are the people who led volodymyr oleksandrovich to the podiums of all olympians under the white hands. and when it was, it was in the era before yeermakovsky, and before the yeermakovsky era, it ended a long time ago, and therefore i agree with those who say, not without reason. that, in fact, by these

decisions, the cuckoo, like the cuckoo that laid it, that is, the cuckoo in the form of an egg, which at one time got to bank street, hatched and threw all the others away. here it is also important to understand that there are two categories of leaders of the president, those who believe that they simply have to ensure his work, not to get in front of the public, in front of the cameras, but to do so... that the president has as well thought out as possible politics, so that he is aware of what is happening, to provide him with versatile multi-vector access to information, and there are others who believe that they are not the first, but also not the second, so others, they always have, and it is very interesting, for example , i had three deputies, my successor viktor bologa already had 11 or more of them there, but yermak also has a dozen of them there, maybe more, and therefore... when these

deputies are replaced, it means that this is definitely not zelenskyi's decision, because zelenskyi, most likely, is not, but i know exactly what's wrong the president... communicates exclusively with yermamak and nobody besides yermak, especially some of his deputies there, of whom there are a dozen, they have neither input nor influence, the situation with the chief is more interesting, because he is the chief, he is formally, i was surprised that he until now, he had this status, but he was called an assistant, or even the first assistant to the president, the first assistant to the president, and that's how i went through it, how i transitioned, i did this, i took this position from viktor yushchenko, because i have... ... there were two deputies and that's all, but this position appeared with leonid kuchma, where the first assistant was serhii lyovochkin, who is still in ukrainian politics, and the bank knows him well, he survived, and medvedchuk, who was

there, well, the personification of evil, a bad policeman, a good policeman, for example, viktor yuchenko and viktor yushchenko's dear friends communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and this was done for the benefit of the doubt. it is obvious that shefir, when he came, as one of the president's biggest friends, he took this function not in order to somehow balance there with bohdan with something else, but most likely zelensky trusted him the most as a friend, and that is why he talks about such issues as contacts with oligarchs, that is, some very sensitive, intimate issues for president zelenskyi , intimate in quotes, were decided by the chief minister, but the chief minister after that attempt, about which they probably already forgot about him , he... approached and in fact, i think that this could not have been the decision of ermak, but it should have been a mutual decision of shefir and zelensky, because, well, this function simply disappeared during the war, but that’s how all these personnel changes are, i’m sure , they initiated and controlled by yermak, and

this is a very harmful construction for president zelensky, because he was, and still is, in yermak's monopoly from the point of view of who he is meeting with? what information does he get, who can have access to him, to zelenskyi, and among other things, this also explains the situation with the secretary of the national security council, because in the constitution of ukraine , the national security council is the body, the only body, that is mentioned in the presidential institute, because there is no office, secretariat, or administration there of the president, nothing is said about it there, and the national security council is really the body that the president, the president who believes in... a collegial decision, who wants to make policy, hear all the arguments there, this is the body that allows the president to gather at the highest level members of the government, politicians and anyone, really, whom the president considers important and influential, and therefore those presidents who are prone to collegial

decisions, and we had very few of them, they could use the national security council, the best the national security council was constructed then. volodymyr horbulin, and i worked with him, i tried to return that format of the council, but it is important to understand that the decisions of the national security council come into effect by the decree of the president of ukraine, and if the ego of the head of the secretariat or the head of the presidential administration and the secretary of the national security council begin to be measured there, the secretary the nsdc always loses, because there were a number of examples when even some decisions there were formally approved by the council. and this is such a big round table, there are many people who speak, someone keeps minutes, well, somewhere there is something, as it is written in the verkhovna rada, but the final document is issued by the president's office, the president's office, the president's administration, and that's why at some point,

this probably appeared to danilov, because danilov went a little into independent swimming, not a little, he is so serious into independent swimming, he was no longer interested there, he started working as a newsmaker, and it was a matter of time, and it is obvious that... on this basis, he had problems with yumak, because danilov, most likely, for the last six months , did not coordinate his public statements there and could be another source of influence on the president, who yermak didn't like, i think that this and besides that, danilov himself was simply tired of being there, it was obvious, mr. oleg, i would like to ask you, that is, the departure of shefir, the departure of trofimov, this means that there will be some noise. on presidential communication with different, so to speak, certain directions, yes, well, because the chief is also a private direction, trofimov, he was responsible for that other regional policy, yes, if yermak has, i don't know, there in my opinion, 10 or so deputies, well, that means none of these

deputies, i insist on this, it really does not affect anything there, he cannot go to a one -on-one meeting with... the president and convey his point of view to the president, the fair stands firmly there, that is, the structure of the office, where a dozen or more deputies, she says that the head of this service... he does not delegate anything to anyone, it's just like that, it's such a labyrinth, you know, a variety of different positions, people are responsible for something, but they submit all documents and all proposals to the head office, and the latter, if he deems it necessary, can be there to give access to the body only in your presence, or to support this or that idea, because if you delegate, then there should be one or two deputies, these deputies should really work. you should meet every day, as we did with all department heads, and discuss the agenda, this

is definitely not the case at the bank now, and therefore i share the point of view of those people who say that this is actually a strengthening or such a reservation of the monopoly of the head of yermak's office on access to the president, well , there is nothing new here, we already had such, we had one tabachnyk, we had medvedchuk there, they all finished poorly in the end and... those people and those presidents around whom such a monopoly was created, because this monopoly can be called differently, you can call it a bubble, you can call it a bunker, when you really you lose contact with the outside world and when the president delegates too much to you, and there is no opportunity to check the quality of your analytics or, well, there is no one who can act as an alternative to some, well, i don't know, critics or offer some other options, and that's why this one. .. this is a disastrous formula, she, well look at the degradation of putin, there is far to go, any president who

freezes, or ferments in the same environment, in the same place, he inevitably, intellectually, politically degrades, or begins to do, so to speak, certain transformations, well, in particular, we remember, there was bohdan, there is no bohdan and so on, maybe there will be some kind of wider front, i don't know of changes, maybe consolidation, that's how we have it. rate, we have an office, we have a national security and defense council, and maybe there will be some, i don't know, synergy. the second moment, which me is disturbing, there is a feeling that in our country, the key body, the verkhovna rada of ukraine, is somehow self-resetting, or it is being reset to zero with the help of someone's specific will, yes, well, the rating was conducted by a sociological agency, evidence of a drop in trust in the parliament, and at the same time we understand that there is a decrease in trust in the president, that is... during a war, a decrease in trust is not good, it is a certain danger

, and we remember very well how important functions the parliament has always been able to perform, our viewers or listeners, many of them will not agree, because they don't like our deputies, they call them, the audience calls them whatever they want, because as for the deputies, we haven't seen any broadcast of the meeting of the president's office there, that's right, and we don't know much there about... about how the government works, maybe they will show a couple of minutes of the opening of the cabinet and the prime minister will say something, but on the other hand, we see a lot of stories, because the deputies have their own telegram channels, they conduct their own communications, there are just some public scandals, a lot of attention, and this attention in most of them are not positive for the parliament, although i confirm that the entire turbulent history of ukraine in the most tumultuous times, when it seemed that now our ship ukraine will simply crash. it was the parliament that acted as a navigator between these reefs, i recently met

a deputy i know there, and the main issue, i say, is what oppresses you the most there, he says that it is the impossibility of you actually going abroad, because it sounds very it's humiliating, there are a lot of deputies really to implement their projects, really, i won't to describe this project, but the project is absolutely normal, the person works for him, the project works for ukraine, he... he needs to do it somewhere in the baltics or somewhere in warsaw, and then go to brussels somewhere, and he says that well, it's very humiliating, you have to stand in line with the speaker there for six months, explain, and they will let you go, if you go to a meeting there conditionally in warsaw, and then you still wind up in brussels, then you will have to explain the reports there, because it is being investigated border guards, that is, this factor, about which already said, he appears to many unconscious deputies, because... what do you influence then, well, you obviously don't influence the government, because the president's office already does it all there, you

're not the one, there is no broadcast, you can't have any information there influence, because the marathon there has a clear list of who to invite and who not, and as a result, many deputies simply do not see any sense in the fact that they are deputies, well, those who came to earn money cannot earn, because there is no one there without them earn, they were simply wiped off, you can earn money only if you are there... gives your share to the main center of power, and this is not the parliament, this is the president's office, that is, you have some schemes to insert yourself, this is also, this is also for an amateur, and if you want something in the country. to change, then you perfectly understand that you are nobody and your name is nothing, and the meeting of zelenskyi with the deputies, and this has already been confirmed by many people, it was a monologue of the president, and the deputies could not insert their 5 kopecks there, that is, the obvious crisis is such an internal one and a plus they do not see their future, usually, if you are a deputy, well, every politician wants to see their political future, well, not everyone, but

many who want to see their political future, they do not see it here, they definitely understand that most of them... what lists will not get there, what will happen with the elections there is unknown, one in short, they are demoralized, they have no influence on the government, they have no influence on the voters, well, they have to either do whatever they are told, or crawl there on their knees, but the question is, well, on the one hand, the parliament does not make some, i don't know, serious competitive center, yes, on the other hand, it was an insurance cent, such a person could sometimes perform the missions of a lightning rod, that is , we understand, unpopular decisions, collective responsibility, it very often somehow, you know, blurs this particular responsibility and, here we understand that, well, something is going on, i don’t know whether it is conscious or not an unconscious campaign of discredit, so , accordingly, perhaps smells of one or another electoral moments, although we understand, well , what the constitution says no, that's what we want and

stab at, well, it's already obvious that let's remind ourselves that this is the first time we have parliament... in which the president had a single majority, as a political force, we have never had such a thing during the years of independence, well , not for the first time, the traditionally pro-presidential force, after a few years of the president's tenure in office, begins to crumble, and the closer to elections, the less influential it is, and there is already a competition for who will be the next presidential force, and problems arise here, because it is already clear that the servant of the people as a brand has already served his purpose, he has no chance of repeating his success there , and for bankova street, on the one hand, i would really like to see some, well, young blood come, for example, if people from the list started coming to the parliament, then it would be

guaranteed, well, in a normal political force, it would be guaranteed those people who are in the team, who are there, who share the ideology of the conditional party, but we know that probably a third of the deputies of the current servants of the people, those who compiled those lists never thought in their lives that these people would get into the parliament, that is why there is a mass completely random people, and you can to allow the quality of those who are even lower there, because it was necessary to simply fill in 450 or how many 300 people there and they wrote from balda, so this is also not a decision, and and accordingly... none of the presidents, this is also not news, each of the presidents did not want to have a strong parliament, well, each of the presidents was annoyed by the parliament, they tried to control it, somehow co-exist, but this is a very difficult story, and there is also shmygal, and someone else can come instead of shmygal, or what do you think , these are premature talks about replacing the head of the government,

well, first of all, he is already a record holder, a record-breaking prime minister, and secondly, from those rumors there and... and this is what i believe, i believe that irmak sees himself as the prime minister sometime at night, well, because he understands how much it is possible to follow zelensky a little and control everything everywhere, and such type of heads of secretariats as, like, yermak, bologa, tabachnyk, medvedchuk, all of them had this vision that after, they understood that you cannot forever to be in this position, for them it was a dream to become the prime minister, in my opinion, none of the heads of the administration... did not become the prime minister, but it is possible in under the current conditions, yermak has such a dream, that is, such a legalization would not be very beneficial for yermak, because then he would have to be really responsible for something, but he is not responsible for anything now, well, you haven't seen him take responsibility although he is not responsible for something, he is not responsible, there is no job description, we do not know what

he can be asked for, journalists write about the fact that he is such a personnel officer who puts his friends on bread. trade winds, but it will end in nothing, so will it be good for country, whether it will change something, i don't know, because it will most likely lead to an inevitable conflict with zelensky, and again from the point of view of management, management will not improve, because i do not imagine yermak, but the head of the cabinet of ministers, collegial, who will be there to listen, where they will have some meetings there, talk about some things, listen... that is , to cooperate with the parliament, it is very difficult with the personal ones, look, but why exactly these changes took place right now in the spring , yes, that is, they could happen, i don't know. three months therefore, they could have been postponed for another couple of months, but it went, such a process went and it went quite quickly, although i say, they repeat themselves, nothing portends the possibility or perspective

of the same parliamentary elections, well , the meeting of the president with his faction that you already mentioned, yes, well, it could be different, somehow, i don't know, warmer, more promising, that is, it would be possible to somehow show the great prospects of individual political development and so on, but not quite enough. i would say so, it was tough harshly, and they could just the president had to give the deputies an opportunity to speak, and it is very important for any politician there, to learn to listen, because a person who even has complaints against you, when you start a dialogue, he somehow warms up internally, why in the spring, well , spring has come, it’s time to plant, they don’t plant, well, it means it’s time to rearrange the partners, there to exchange awl for soap, i said this proverb and thought: that now, if you say awl for soap, then it will already grow some additional fur , overgrown with fur, overgrown, because in us another phenomenon has already appeared there, which is

very discretionary for the sbu, well, that is, the sbu, which is the security service of ukraine, which has not given up on fighting not with ukrainian business, with domestic business, but with the enemy , does not leave, they cut this one. regularly, and this fact, one of those facts that definitely does not speed up our european integration, but why in the spring, well, because first of all, a few things, the president, i think it started with those reshuffles, well, in particular, the factor of hard work, i think there is a lot those present, well, because there have been some changes, the president began to speak, because there were expectations in society based on the results of the year, we are not having a very successful year, because if the year is successful, well , who would make these changes, and and... because this is the price for the fact that you concentrate power, this is the fact that you are responsible for everything, even for what you are involved in, i.e. the rating of the president began to slide, there was a resignation for a bad person, there

were other resignations, and there were also some reshuffles in the government, some ministers whom we have already forgotten, and a conversation about what now we need, this is the president, the office of the president began to prepare public opinion to the fact that we now need to regroup, go to another level and show everyone kuskino mother, and therefore to show it without ... changes in the office was very strange, well everyone they understand that the decision-making center, the real decision-making center, is on bankova street, and they are changing some rangers there, and therefore it was already very logical, i heard conversations about the change of two rangers there since the fall, but the surnames of these two advisers were definitely different, i was there tatars shurma, this is what was expected there let's say at the event, our partners and journalists expected that this is the most odious, let's say last name. or for some scandals, discredited names, but these people remained, why i started with the fact that there is no tsunami there, the key players remained, but why in the spring, well, this is

a certain cycle somewhere, a reaction to the drop in ratings, i think that this team very carefully monitors the mood, they need to and, although we must give credit, that zelensky for his certain presidential algorithm, he is on the moment there... the last year of the presidency has the highest rating, in my opinion, of all its predecessors, but it was necessary to do something about it, to demonstrate that it is not only about the ministers and deputies, but also about the structure itself zelenskyi, he wants to show that he also understands here, infuses new blood, as president kuchma once said there, in the second term we will not see another kuchma. thank you very much, mr. oleg, an extremely interesting and meaningful conversation for our viewers. i would like to remind you that oleg rybachuk was currently working on espresso, former head of president viktor yushchenko's secretariat, co-founder of the chesno movement. thank you. the time of our program has run out,

stay with the espresso tv channel. my colleagues will inform you about all the most important events of this day. take care of yourself and your loved ones. see espresso. see you on air. 13-year-old olena and her 15-year-old brother artem yankovskyi. these children lived in the kakhovsky district of the kherson region in the village of chaplinka, which has remained occupied since the first days of the war. about a month ago, we received information about the disappearance of yankovsky's brother and sister. also , for more than nine months , the fate of two more boys from the occupied part of kherson oblast has remained unknown. this is 13-year-old ivan gorbachevskiy and. as well as 13-year-old nazarriy maksimov. the boys disappeared in the city of skadovsk in june 2023. that is why i am appealing to

everyone who sees me, and especially to... kherson region, with a request to help find the children. look closely at the faces of the missing: 13-year-old olena yankovska looks her age. she has gray-green eyes and light blond hair. the girl is very similar to her brother artem yankovskyi. they have almost identical noses and lips. the boy looks a little older, he also has blond hair and gray-green eyes. they were last seen in the village of chaplinka in the kakhov district of the kherson region. and now attention is paid to the photo of the missing boys in the skadovsky district of the region: 13-year-old ivan gorbachevskiy looks his age, he has blue eyes and short light blond hair. nazari maksimov is also 13 years old, but the boy looks, perhaps, a little older than his age. the boy is thin, has dark hair and brown eyes. official information about the disappearance these boys arrived in the summer of last year. if suddenly someone has information about

possible. the whereabouts of elena, artem, ivan or nazariy, or maybe you just saw these children somewhere, let us know right away. even a small piece of news can become very important. you can call the magnolia child tracing service at any time of the day by dialing the short number 11630. calls from all ukrainian mobile operators are free. if you suddenly find yourself in a temporarily occupied territory and cannot make a call. write to the chatbot of the service search for children in telegram, or look for us on facebook. i have told you the stories of just four children who disappeared due to a full-scale russian invasion. in total, since the beginning of the war, we have received more than three thousand appeals for help in the search. of course, the vast majority of children were found and now everything is fine with them, but unfortunately, the fate of many still remains unknown, and

everyone can help find them. believe me, just a minute of your time can be decisive. go to the website of the magnolia children's search service in the missing children of ukraine section. here you can view all the photos of the missing, maybe you will recognize someone and eventually help to find them. at the same time, unfortunately, children are also disappearing in the territories controlled by ukraine. and, as experience shows, child tracing services. the vast majority of them are teenagers, who most often resort to running away because of... their experiences and some unresolved problems. we talked about this topic with a psychologist and collected a lot of tips for parents that can prevent a child from suddenly running away from home. according to experts, it very often happens that the problems of teenagers reflect the problems of the adults around them. therefore, psychologists advise first of all to establish one's own emotional comfort, then it will be much easier for an adult to help his

child. take care of your psychological well-being, be attentive to yourself, because often the problems of children and teenagers are a reflection of the problems of adults who surround them, and if you feel tired and exhausted, if nothing makes you happy, something worries and scares you, if you notice that have become less productive, that you are more often annoyed, that you have some problems with with memory, for example, with attention, with concentration, this is all an excuse for you to apply for help, get this help, adjust your... your life, adjust your own psychological comfort and then already from a healthy, prosperous position to help your child, and perhaps, at that moment, this help will no longer be needed. we have created a resource through which you can report any crime against a child, in any city, at any time, just go to the site and report, and we will launch

all possible mechanisms of punishment. a criminal stop accepting ua. 32-year-old karina has been living with a spinal cord injury for 20 years. he has lived in lviv for seven years and helps people with similar injuries. he says that the city of leva has become more convenient for people with reduced mobility during this time. however, there are still many barriers and we decided to protest together. to what extent is lviv accessible to people in wheelchairs. this path is so that the center... dobzhenko was already considered accessible, there should already be a normal surface, a normal surface so that a person could reach it to this long stretch, because now what we we use special skills to move these slabs and these gaps between these slabs, it's like our superskills, but there are a lot of people who don't have these superskills...