it is a valid opinion, since he was a director, he could well have been attracted to this figure from an anthropological point of view, yes, because he was undoubtedly an outstanding personality, but i now have the thought that dovzhenko is possible, when this already started to spread oppressive flywheel, uh, maybe he had some... that he would sacrifice himself, and well, that is, if he took the side, so to speak, of evil, then it would be like such a ritual sacrifice, and maybe from that others will suffer less, maybe he somehow believed, that he can influence the situation and persuade, maybe he believed that his art influences stalin, and stalin will listen to him, but this, this is now ... my guess, because

dovzhenko, it seems that he constantly doubted this decision , and i saw such an opinion that stalin, for example, offered him to move to moscow in the 33rd year, it seems, dovzhenko, when you left, he offered him so that dovzhenko would not see the famine that was happening in ukraine, so that he could not somehow witness it very much close ones, although dovzhenko could not help but know. of course, his parents were here, but his, yes, his parents were here, and it affected them, but in the 32nd year he filmed ivan on the dniproges, ugh, which was also shelved, although it was shown at the venice festival , it was the first at the first festival in venice, and perhaps the fact that both zemlya and ivan were already lit abroad, they... were seen there, as in the case of

peradzhanov, when the publicity of his film, which did not manage to hide in time, raised the voices of the world film community, and perhaps that is why dovzhenkom, well, that’s how they got by, and the next film after 32, it was already 35, eh, aerograd, which he already shot on mosfilm, for according to stalin’s idea, in fact, maybe it is one of the reasons were the same, but i agree with you that i... i think it is because of his world fame and because stalin, perhaps, understood that it was better to use him, and stalin used him to the fullest, i think , and with regard to erograd and shchors, because shchors was also stalin's idea, to shoot the ukrainian chapaev in this way, as if yes, yes, and there, in principle, in both films , it is very, well, very well traced, if there are still some hesitations in the land, and there are also a lot of them in ivan. there is a hesitation between that, well, such

an artistic understanding of whether what is happening here is good, whether this transformation is good and where it leads, because dovzhenko puts these doubts in the mouths of his characters, they certainly do not look very motivating for those who start to build, then the aerograd and shors, they are already quite like that, they are not a reflection of reality, they are clear structures, no matter how small. to be in aerograd is a very well-written megalomania, and here is such a desire for something gigantic, gigantic, big, majestic, to conquer, take away, conquer, ugh, and this is also something that is not characteristic of ukrainians, i also planned to ask you to talk about in my opinion, the most tragic scenario of a dovdenka called ukraine. fires, this is a script,

a film script that he wrote in 1942, if i'm not mistaken, yes, and we found his address where he says these words ukraine is on fire, this is at the beginning of the war, he addresses as if with a call, it seems interesting to us just to look at the temperament of oleksandr dovzhenko. ukraine is on fire, in our vast spaces. so beautiful and joyful in the recent past, cities and villages have been burning nonstop for two years now, movelatan jokers, who illuminate the great tragedy of modern times, listen to the contemporaries of the great era, ukrainians who are surrounded by the fires of the country, the decisive time of the willless struggle is coming, it will be...

in general, this film scripts, you know what is striking, striking, how it hurts him, so this catastrophe of ukraine, which happened after... the battle world war ii, so that it hurts terribly. i found a quote. dovzhenko writes on november 6, 1943. and listen, just now, in these days, in this, at this historical point, how painful it is to read, and how it hurt dovzhenko himself. he writes: ukraine is ruined like no other country in the world, all the cities have been robbed. we have no schools, no institutes, no museums, no libraries. ours died. historical archives, painting, sculpture, architecture died, all bridges, roads were destroyed, ruined by the war national economy, destroyed people, beat, hanged, drove into slavery, we have almost no scientists, not enough artists, so he

writes a movie script, shows khrushchev, yes, khrushchev, somehow, i don’t know if it’s khrushchev, or somehow it gets into this film script to beria and from... we also chose a quote from stalin, simply, which says that this script dovzhenka's ukraine is on fire is a revision of leninism. on january 1, 1944, imagine that stalin called a special meeting of the cpsu and gave a speech, there a transcript of stalin's speech, which says the following: if you judge the war until dovzhenko is mentioned, then

representatives of all the peoples of the ussr do not participate in the national war, only ukrainians participate in it, which means that it is not the authorities here again . dovzhenko writes this famous phrase of his in his diary, writes that on january 31, 1944, i was brought to the kremlin, there i was cut to pieces and the bloody parts of my soul were scattered. to shame and defeat in all gatherings, i held on for a year and fell, mine my heart could not withstand the burden of lies and evil, i was born and lived for good and love, i was killed by the hatred of the great just at the moment of their smallness, whether or not this is the moment of truth

for dovzhenko, this is the story of ukraine on fire, or not there is a moment of truth for him, but on the other hand, he then continues to film something even further, he then films michurin. that is, it’s not the end yet, no, it’s not the end yet, and during, well, actually during the war , he also shot a chronicle film, well, it’s like notes about the war, but then they remained there proshkovaya amerika in the year 51, and there was also proshkovaya amerika, so absolutely also a propaganda film, yes, it is about the criminal activities of the american special services against diplomats, well, in fact, in 56 dovzhenko died, but in that interval she was there. another poem about the sea, i don’t know if it was an epiphany or not, but the moment of truth, the moment when he expressed it already, he said it a little earlier, he has such a phrase, which our film experts included in the exhibition, the river screamed howl, like a wounded

beast, this is a story about a film study of how the dnipro changed due to development cascade hes, ugh. and actually is the instrument of what for the soviet authorities was the construction of this gigantic project, and that is the movement back, which we later dealt with after the russians blew up the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, and now zaporizhzhia has also suffered, and that is dovzhenko somewhere in the period of 20 in the 1930s, he had a phrase that between truth and beauty, i choose beauty, and... i think it's his, and again, it's my fantasy, but it's very reminiscent of his political manifesto, because he had to either construct the truth, and maybe this is also one of the reasons why he was with stalin, because stalin valued artists,

he understood who was capable of what, but having dovzhenko by his side made it easier for him to control him, and he, because what, what meanness he did longer publicizing ukraine in flames, it was really such a blow in the back for stalin. i, we, we are these today. in this program, we talk about dovzhenko, his legacy and how to tell the truth, how to understand dovzhenko, find a language that would narrate, yes, that would convey the whole complex, what it consisted of, the worldview of this person, the mentality of this person and so on, now the critical question is not only the return of dovzhenko's creative heritage, but also the return. debt to the center, yes, to the institution you lead, yes, no, not

return, but preservation, in fact. for people who do not know about the history of the dovzhenko center, i would like to remind you that in 2022 there was a decision by the ukrainian authorities to reorganize the dovzhenko center, which actually meant the liquidation of the dovzhenko center. the cultural community has your back, court recognized the order of the state. about the reorganization as illegal, but now, as far as we know, there is an appeal, so what is the current situation with the dovzhanka center? the situation at the center is difficult, because we have not received state funding for several months, and this greatly affects the efficiency or motivation for work, but people, museum workers or the archive'. film archivists are a very specific category of people who for some reason protect what

does not belong to them, we protect what belongs to the country, and if the country does not have its own film fund is needed, then i have a question, for what, what are we fighting for, but my colleagues who are currently working at the center, they understand very well their responsibility and their importance in working with the films that we have. are stored, this is actually the largest collection, the only one of ukrainian cinema that exists in ukraine, and here the connection with dovzhenko is also direct, i believe, because he had the idea even when he worked at vovka, he had the idea that ukrainian , that films need a film archive, or a fund where they will be stored, because that was the case with films very careless handling, they burned and spoiled easily, and he had the idea of ​​creating a film archive. where the films will be stored, but in the 30th year ukrainian cinema

basically all left for russia, maybe something remained in the film studios, but at a very high risk, because it was not allowed, and actually in ukraine until the 94th year of its film archive or blue, and actually in ukraine until 1994 there was no film archive or cinematheque, only thanks to the efforts of... some very wise people, among whom were mr. yakovyna and ivan dzyuba, and yuriy ilyenko, mykola yakovyna was the deputy minister, and while performing the duties of the minister of culture, there was a period like that, because he was developing the charter of the center itself, then these people understood that we, well, we have a museum, but we don't have one there is no film museum or film fund of its own, that is, our film memory is located in a different state from which we are now independent, and so began a very long process of collecting cinema and returning it

to ukraine, that is, we collected cinema for 30 years, and we believe that it is now formally gone the need to transfer the films to some other institution now, to normalize the activities of the center, to ensure it in terms of sustainability, so that we can preserve the life of the films, and ... a period when everything is in danger, i think that is the primary function of the state, but since it does not really want to do this, but has switched to industry, accordingly, in their eyes, the film archive looks like ballast and something unnecessary, and there is no one to protect it except ourselves and our society, well, it is good that here our tasks seem to coincide , so we let's continue to work and... although we would like to focus more on the topics that you raise today, because

it is very important for us how we ourselves will relate to our own cultural heritage, how we will understand it, how we will talk about it to speak, because now there are extremely many scandals surrounding each personality, and it is obvious that we elementary know very little about our own cinema or. about my own art, and i also consider myself one of those people who are not very well -informed, i'm just lucky to work with those who do it, who research well, and there are also people who remember history. but we are very synchronous here with dovzhenko, that is, we are part of the same society, where on the one hand we want russian funds, and on the other hand we are threatened, and they are our enemy, and we cannot figure out who is our hero, whom we have to pass, and this is the work of cultural institutions.

anyway, i thank you, i thank you, thank you to your team, and thank you to the communities that support you, because you... you do a tremendous job, even without funding, you do, perhaps the main work of preservation of cultural heritage. thank you, thank you for this conversation. thank you, because you are also among those who support us. thanks. olena honcharuk, head of the dovzhanko center, was our guest. these are proper, proper names. we will see you in a week. thank you. there are discounts on capsules linex forte 15% in pharmacies psyllium you and save. vasyl zima's big broadcast. this is the great ether, my name is vasyl zima, and we are starting. two hours of air time. two hours of your time.

we will discuss many important topics today. two hours to learn about the war. now. we will talk more about the war, serhiy sgurets is with us, but how does the world live? and now , yuriy fizar, yuriy dobrevecher will speak in more detail about what happened in the world, please give me the floor. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchivka is with us. alexander, congratulations, please. and sports news. a review of sports events from yevhen postahov. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. thank you very much elina chechen for information about cultural news. presenters who have become like relatives to many. natalka didenko is already ready to tell us about... the weather for the coming day, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio. andriy parubiy, people's deputy of ukraine, was also the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. the premium

sponsor of the national team represents. united by football, stronger together. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. most current topics of the week: russia's war against ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics that resonate in our society. drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other russian cities. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project: "we are bored, because there is nothing to fight about. let's invent it." they help to understand

the present and predict the future. for the world, a second trump presidency will be terrifying. a project for those who care. and thinkers politclub every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. estoy poco

see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. candidates for vacant positions in courts. why did the wife of the ex-chairman of the ukrainian people's liberation army decide to become a judge. based on this fact, nazk conducted an inspection. but who will take the vacated chair of the head of the ukrainian central committee. no one has yet nominated members of the commission. congratulations. you watch court control, i'm tatyana shustrova. in ukraine there was an acute shortage of judges. the judicial system is overloaded. today, the shortage of themis servants is about 2.5%. thousands the higher qualification commission works non -stop to fill vacant positions as quickly as possible. competitions for constitutional court, appeals, and

local judges are in full swing. we continue to introduce you to candidates. but first to the news. the higher qualification commission of judges was unable to elect a new chairman after the dismissal of the previous chairman, roman ignatov. it was not found among the members of the vkks. willing to hug vacant position, the question arose unexpectedly for all of us, officially no one has yet nominated members of the commission. we will remind you that on march 27, the previous head of the higher qualification commission, roman ignatov, resigned of his own free will. in december of last year , information appeared in zma that ignatov allegedly has russian citizenship. he himself denied it. at the beginning of this year, the vkk reached a conclusion to establish whether he received. roman ignatov. citizenship of the russian federation in the 90s is quite impossible. currently, the state bureau of investigation conducts a pre-trial investigation in the criminal proceedings against ignatov under the article on

high treason under martial law. the scandal regarding the alleged russian citizenship of the judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv does not subside. the sixth court of appeals has begun consideration of the case on lviv's reinstatement as a judge. earlier, the court of first instance satisfied his claim and made a decision. not only to renew the position, but also to pay wages for the period of forced absenteeism. the supreme court did not agree with this and filed an appeal. we will remind you, bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received his russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine. and at the age of 45 in 2012 , he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. confirm that lviv has russian citizenship. security service of ukraine. already at the last court session , the representative of the sbu reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers that lviv's russian citizenship

exists, but now they can neither prove nor disprove it information on the availability of citizenship is impossible. bohdan lviv continues to assure that there is no passport of the aggressor country. on june 11, the supreme court of ukraine will begin consideration of a cassation appeal against the verdict of the judge of the mukachiv city district court of zakarpattia oblast mykhailo. he was sentenced to five years in prison with confiscation of property. nabu detectives exposed a judge for a bribe of uah 2,000 back in 2017. and so it was about two or three pieces of dollars. according to the investigation, mykhailo pak made the necessary decision for money in the case of the social welfare department of mukachivska administration ivan presents the offering. in 2019, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced

mykhailo pak to seven years in prison, this sentence was overturned by an appeal, but the supreme court returned the case for a new trial, and only that year, in december, the appeals chamber of the higher anti-corruption court finally put an end to the case of mykhailo pak, but he filed a cassation appeal. the judicial system is being renewed in ukraine. competitions for the constitutional court, appeals, and local courts are in full swing. for the first time, all these competitions take place as much as possible transparent and open. we watch the interviews live. how unscrupulous candidates get away with trying to manipulate facts and how they try to hide blemishes in their biography. for me, this is a conscious choice. this is lawyer oksana ovsienko, she is applying for the post of judge. the questions are not difficult for me, i have absolutely nothing to hide, i have logical explanations for all the questions presented here.

she is also the wife of andrii ovsienko, a former member and head of the supreme council of justice, who resigned in 21st year. this property, which stated in my declaration, my declaration is identical to my husband's declaration, this property was acquired during joint joint property of the spouses. years ago, oksana ovsienko managed to privatize a plot of land with an area of ​​320 m2 in the picturesque place near the lake. my husband and i planned to build a small house for recreation there, this is a village, but there is a small lake in the village, but soon the plans changed, we decided that we will not live in this area, we will come to the city of lutsk to live. time in conversation with mine colleague titivalov kostyantyn kostyantynovich, he turned to me in a conversation to sell him this plot of land, as he said that he

found out... from the cadastral maps that this plot of land borders his father's plot of land. i wonder why colleague ovsienko was looking at where she has land. nevertheless, according to the candidate, the appraised value of the land was allegedly small, so much so that she simply gave it away. besides, my husband and konstantin were classmates, and they were, well, they were acquaintances. but the story is something more interesting in three weeks. after receiving the gift, the brother of ovsienko's colleague, kostyantyn titivalov, roman, a judge of the torii district court of the volyn region, announced a decision in the case in favor of ovsienko's client. interesting coincidence, isn't it? and what would have happened if you had not given or sold this plot of land to a relative of the judge, yes, obviously he could have taken offense at you theoretically, i do not think, i believe that

directly on... for example, the judge and his brother, these are two completely different families, they do not live together, that is, they are not alike family members share common rights and responsibilities. it is interesting that, according to avtomaidan, from 2015 to 2017, the candidate represented the parties in as many as 15 cases heard by this particular judge. subsequently, when ovsienko's husband became a member of the supreme council of justice, judge roman titivalov was appointed as a judge for an indefinite period, and in 2000, in the 19th year, when ovsienko held the position of the head of the vrp, the council helped titivalov avoid punishment for the road accident he caused while on the driving his audi in a state of severe alcohol intoxication. i know that nazk was investigating this fact . the family of the candidate for the post of judge and former chairman of the supreme council of justice lives in a house of 124 m2 and has 15

acres of land under it. oksana ovsienko also managed to obtain and privatize it for free, this plot of land was purchased by me in the process of privatization on this plot of land, our land house is located, the cost, why i did not mention it, because there was no need, we had no desire not to sell, i.e. there was no need to assess this plot as it was acquired free of charge, we admire the character of oksana ovsienko from free. acquisition of land, however, she did not help her pass the interview. the commission was not satisfied with the explanation of the dubious property schemes. and this is hanna andrienko, the judge of the oktyabr district court of the city of poltava, and she has a very poor immunity. he fails her every time on the eve of the qualifying assessment. on the fourth day , andrienko did not come to the interview because she fell ill. in fact, we have every reason

to suspect that... that in this way the judge is trivially trying to escape his resignation before the interview, because if after the qualification assessment, the commission recognizes her as unfit for the position of judge, she will be dismissed, in return, her resignation will allow her to retain all her judicial privileges and a considerable lifetime allowance from the state. there are reasons to worry. according to the conclusion of the public integrity council, judge andrienko closed at least 49 cases related to drunken driving after the expiry of the time limits. the public integrity council draws attention to the fact that the judge's omission of the time limits for bringing persons to justice under article 130 of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses are systematic. and in the motivational part of the decisions, there is not enough justification to explain why the judge missed the deadline in such a large number of cases. currently under consideration in

the supreme council. justice has a disciplinary complaint against andrienko from the dere foundation. it refers to the fact that the judge could submit forged documents to the vrp in order to avoid disciplinary action. the result of considering just this complaint may be the dismissal of andrienko, which she is trying so hard to do avoid therefore, the illness did not prevent the judge from submitting an application for resignation to the higher council of justice and an application to the higher qualifications commission for termination of the relationship. during her illness, she also sometimes appeared at other meetings, but she never made it to the evaluation of the judge's qualifications. we hope that soon the supreme council of justice will stop this manipulative attraction of cleverness and cunning. for today, i have everything, it was the program judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you have information about unscrupulous judges and facts of corruption in

judiciary, message me on facebook or at'.