74.9% do not trust 8.9 and public emergency services 80% and 40 do not trust 13.2%. well, olya, these are absolutely clear numbers, and here, actually, i don’t know whether it is possible or necessary to comment on the fact that those people on whom life in ukraine depends, even more so, people trust, that is, it is absolutely obvious that here there are no institutions that... well, let's say there do not participate in the defense of the state, and well, i would rather say that this is only an indicator that despite probably all those processes to undermine the country's defense capability, which is here it's been going on for about a year now, but you see, it still didn't succeed in directly destroying her trust in the army, despite all the reshuffles there. and somehow it was not possible to knock

the idea out of the minds of the citizens that the country still needs to be defended, although it gave the impression that a lot was being done for this. well, the fact that the country needs to be defended is a statement confirmed by the verkhovna rada of ukraine, because the law on mobilization, which was introduced by the government of ukraine on december 26, 2023, on april 11, 2024, was generally adopted . parliament removed from the document the clause on demobilization, which provided for the release of those who are at the front, who are in the armed forces after 36 months of service, which is still in the law on mobilization, we will briefly remind our viewers, those who received the second and third groups are only eligible disability after february 24, 2022, except for military personnel , you must re-pass the... lc all military servicemen

must clarify their data within 60 days in the tsc or electronic cabinet. all men must have a military registration card with them document and show it at the request of authorized law enforcement officers, men who do not update their data or evade mobilization, may limit the right to drive vehicles, conscripts abroad, consular services will be restricted until they update their data, well, that's a lot. .. in brief, i would say, the main points of this law on mobilization, oleksia, but considering the procedure itself, how it all happened, that these are all 400 amendments, in fact no one supported them and there were no votes for these amendments, and there was formal just the procedure for passing these 400 amendments , almost 400 amendments with the exception of committee ones, was it necessary to arrange... this long

period of consideration of this draft law, which is so necessary during the war, and was it necessary to follow the procedural rules in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, taking into account that , that there is a war in the country, and the leader of the mobilization process one way or another, if he did not want it, is the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine, and all this was possible. much easier and faster to do? well, firstly, no one, no one canceled the procedure, you need to follow the law and the procedure, it is on the one hand, on the other hand, well, it is generally a habit of the current government, we even remember laws that did not relate, so to speak, to military issues, military issues, even in peacetime, conditionally in peacetime, since the war has been going on for 10 years, and it is obvious that anything is possible. now the government is in power during

the war, but before the large-scale invasion, we remember, for example, the adoption of the law on land, that is, the situation was absolutely the same, speak, speak, you do not disturb us, submit amendments, we will consider them, then no amendments are accepted, they are adopted in the form in which the subject submits a legislative initiative, there is the cabinet of ministers or someone else, so we have to get used to this by now. that this will obviously continue to happen in the future, it is obvious that it could have been adopted earlier and not dragged out so much, but again, well, this is a general situation when politicians remain politicians even during the war, we remember how much there was around that that this demobilization procedure is not in the law, but we have it to remind that... this issue was raised

again by the same servants of the people, the same one who, excuse me, was the first to raise this issue, although the military then said that it should not be determined by law. only we do not know the situation, we cannot predict the situation, which depends not only on us at the front, so again, it seems to me that too much time was lost precisely in view of the political circumstances of making any decisions, even in conditions when we supposedly have a parliamentary majority, parliaments. but on the other hand, what happened in the parliament, oil, shows that there is no parliamentary crisis, if... in the parliament there are votes for the bill for the adoption of the law on, well , the bill on mobilization, and if the servants of the people do not go to the meeting when they are not they want these amendments to be voted on

by this faction, well, it turns out that the office of the president of ukraine can mobilize when necessary, and this is the majority in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, and here are all the conversations there about the parliamentary crisis that have been taking place over the past two months. they just don't have there are no reasons behind them, well, they did not have reasons behind them before, because in principle there were votes for the adoption of this law before, they had been there since december, when it was first introduced, even then they were fine, but since the president, let me remind you, it seems that since may 23rd, he did not even sign the law on lowering the threshold for mobilization from 27 to 25 years, then this gave both his politsil and a bunch of others. some kind of, well, i think it’s a false signal that it’s necessary right now at this moment to literally get involved in some kind of, you know, race and struggle, for literal protection, who better protect the evader, well, for some reason the political

power of the president and he himself decided that these are not his voters at the front, that his voters are exclusively in the rear, and they do not want to mobilize, and they need to be protected, more. then they forgot something, that we have the same civilians at the front in our country, who are also there temporarily, and their rights must also be protected, and in principle, well, somehow, this whole story, well, the government started it, the government got into it , the authorities as a result arranged, well , i think the story with this law is absolutely disgusting, because it is easy to take it all this time, then when the time is down. we could already form new brigades for six months, we could already do rotation, but thanks to the commander-in-chief, well , that is, the president, we now have a problem with the fact that we do not have enough

people at the front, it is not it's about demobilization for the simple reason that we don't even have enough people, but they... tried all the time somehow to avoid the fact that it is necessary to attract more people to the army, that through the army it is so necessary, that several million citizens would pass so that it would be an opportunity to bring some of them out, to give them the opportunity to return home, they were talking about some kind of economic front, as if these civilians who are now in the army, they cannot return home and keep the economic the front, as well as those who hold it now, well, what's the problem, they are the same civilians. people, businessmen, workers in labor professions, farmers, well , they are absolutely no different, they can definitely hold on for a while the economic front, and the economic front, i believe, will not fall under this, if there is simply a rotation, and so

on willingness to carry out a fair mobilization, because as long as there is such a concept as reservation er according to non- military criteria, that is, there should be only one criterion for reservation, this person is simply vitally necessary to maintain defense capability at his workplace, and he should be exactly the same mobilized and obliged to be at that job, well, since he is a military man, he can't suddenly say: oh, i'm resigning, sorry, i wanted to go somewhere else, bye bye... bye, i went somewhere , if we book someone, then he should be at his place of work, like a soldier, regardless of whether he wants to be there or not, well, everything should be fair, right, and even more so there should not be some orts of art workers,

the national union of journalists, these people are badly needed now to provide something, i don't think it's necessary at all, the circus, the circus is needed, why, well, well, it, it's all of us. we all understand very well that the defense capability of the country does not depend on these people in any way, because they are interchangeable in this regard, tell some legends about the fact that there are some very... talented people who absolutely cannot, well , that's all it's all wrong, as a result of all this they simply forgot that we have a large number of civilians at the front, for whom all this whistling, it's just extremely, well, it just demoralizes them in the first place, and this the main danger of the country is to demoralize those people who are at the front. thank you, olya, oleksiy, when this draft law was submitted to... the council and even after that, a lot was said and is still being said about justice during

mobilization, but what is fair mobilization? fair mobilization - mobilization of all, everything else will somehow always raise the question of whether it is fair or not. but look at the law that has been passed and the system that is being proposed. now from the ministry of defense and the government, because the verkhovna rada of ukraine adopted a draft law, submitted by the government, whether this system is currently fair without a decision on the mobilization procedure, on how it will take place, that is, whether it is possible to say that now the mobilization in ukraine is fair, well , i'm sorry, i didn't hear the whole question, well, obviously , that if there is... a question, then it can be called not entirely fair, at least,

of course, everyone has their own criteria, but it seems to me that there are too many political games around this, these decisions could have been made faster, more efficiently, and after all it is it would have been more effective, but again they postponed this issue because there were questions about the ratings there, politics and who... who protects people, who does not protect people, and i think that this did not have a negative impact on the adoption of this law. first of all, in terms of time, we always don't have enough time, and we have such a great luxury in passing this law, this is on the one hand, and on the other hand , we see that politics has not gone anywhere, i wanted to return to that issue , which you asked, whether there is a political crisis or whether there is no political crisis, political there is a crisis, it will not go anywhere. there are simply decisions that must be made regardless of whether they are political or not, whether they are

parliamentary or not, the question of mobilization is just such a question, because it is about the survival of the country, the survival of every ukrainian, and obviously these decisions have be adopted, regardless of whether there is a majority in the verkhovna rada or not . on other issues, such a majority, as we see, well, in many cases, when there are votes, and even during discussion. of this law, when we have half a hall somewhere is happening from the meeting hall, this means that in fact the crisis is quite, quite deep, well , you will not invite the military to each and every bill, who will come to the hall and force the deputies to vote one way or another, in fact, they are military because they are perform more important duties, including at the front, so it seems to me that this is rather an imitation in that... you see, there is no crisis, there is a crisis, it has not gone anywhere, but how, how to fight with this

political crisis, which is, or the parliamentary one crises in ukraine, under the conditions when there are no elections, that is, the elections will not be held soon, and it is clear that the parliament must work, and the president must work until the moment until there is victory, until the war in ukraine is finished, as to motivate or how? how to properly conduct a conversation with those who are in this political crisis and are deepening this political crisis, look, you need to motivate people to join the defense, that's where motivation is needed, and to motivate deputies to fulfill their duties, you know, it's kind of strange, in general , to me it seems that the constitution provides for several possibilities and actions of the deputy in the event that it happens. a political or parliamentary crisis, on the one hand there are elections, this is something that

is impossible now, but it is possible to reformat a coalition, a coalition is created not only once and for all, it can change during one term of office, it is necessary, in principle, in conditions of war , it is worth creating a broader coalition that would not depend, so to speak, on a few people or a few votes during a vote, but that means definitely means. bigger the responsibility of people who feel the responsibility of creating this coalition, involvement, obviously, it requires more flexibility from political forces, first of all. servants of the people, who are the leading force in one way or another in the parliament, are obviously not supposed to adopt as a law, that is, you can propose any amendments, but we vote only the law that comes to us in the first form, obviously we have to listen to the people , which represent other political forces, well, but again, this

requires greater responsibility, but again, the question here is not that there are no elections or that our parliament does not exist. the parliament exists, there are deputies in it, and it must be created, if, if one majority does not work, a new one must be created. well, it is absolutely, absolutely obvious, and everything is correct, you, oleksiy, say, but, well, the reality is that, in the conditions of monopolies, it is probably necessary to talk about mono-responsibility, because when it comes to monopolies, everything is absolutely obvious, there is a parliamentary majority there... headed by a servant of the people, or rather, there is a servant of the people by a monomajority, and when it comes to responsibility, then there is no monoresponsibility, so for some reason this responsibility is blurred in our country, well, i wouldn’t say that it is blurred, nothing, sorry, but look, well, the law on mobilization turned out that way, no matter how they tried to blur it responsibility, no matter how much the president tried to avoid it, as

a result, his party voted for exactly the law that he immediately submitted, that's all and... as a result, we had to vote for exactly such an option that was immediately proposed, because it turned out that there was no alternatives to it, like even if the president did not want to avoid this, and now he himself has to speak out and say that this is how we should punish evaders more, this is how we should recruit more into the army, he was running away, running away from this responsibility, he did not run away from it anywhere as a result, so , again, the attempts continue for some reason on... the seas, i took the ship through four oceans and 20 , and so on and so on, and then he says, as a result, we ran aground, well, that is, either i,

a well-known anecdote, when the captain tells that either we, the responsibility does not exist, it is obtained so to speak... so, as they say, the russians shimmer. thank you oleksiy. let me remind you, friends, that we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. in the course of this broadcast, we are conducting a survey, we are asking you about the following: would you trust the power of the military police after the war? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you watch us on tv, grab your smartphone or phone and vote yes. 0800-211-381, no, 0800-211. 382, all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will match voting results. a very short topic, about how in lviv lviv beaumond justified his entertainment by collecting funds for drones and how the chief inspector of the lviv customs yulia dryga was fired from her job after she

said in a video that her clothes cost a total of about $800 , i.e.... a very short topic of two news, the first is that the participants of the luxurious party led by the resort raised money for only seven fpv drones, i.e. the five-star resort complex edem resort medical enspa and lviv media and our colleagues wrote about this party, so they spent a lot more on this party than all these people in diamonds and evening dresses. they collected 115 hryvnias for fiov drones, and they spent an order of magnitude more, but all of this was packaged, of course, in this charity event, the whole community then reflected when they read the information on lvivmedia and quarreled with our colleagues for

what they they wrote it, but during the war, they arranged such a party, people, people are not poor, but they gathered rather modestly. another heroine is the chief inspector yulia dryga of the lviv customs office, today she was fired from her job, after she talked in a video about how well she was dressed, she became the heroine of a story on the tiktok of blogger mykola karma, who asked people on the streets of lviv about their clothes, let's see, because this very nice video. hat, baginsky 18, the dog's name is gucci, she even has a gucci leash, so gucci is specially made for dogs, how much does such a leash cost? somewhere around $200, $200, a bag, so you already know the prices of all the tech guys, but if i did, everyone answered me like that, then i wouldn’t have anything to take off, maybe they bought it through bayer, maybe the shoes were about one and a half times cheaper,

the erme shoes are about 800 dollars, and the watch is about 5,000, and how much does it cost? the jacket is so high and she took about 200, chalcedony tights, one and a half for sure, what do you do, a little for yourself, a little for the state, state workers, yes, she works a little for herself, a little for the state, that is, said the chief inspector of lviv customs, ola, this story testifies to this party, and about this chief inspector of the lviv customs, so that for some people there is no war as such, they go there in clothes for 800 dollars, work a little for the state, a little for themselves, who has them? well, this law on mobilization should actually lead to the idea , well, and secondly, well, in fact, this is all about what we talked about with you,

it is clear that there are women, no one mobilizes them, such a thing, but the fact that they don't even feel that they want to go for a walk and need to somehow camouflage it, well, that's right, because they don't feel, well, what to say, they really feel very safe, they don't experience any difficulties in life at all. er, moreover, judging by everything, this is even such a phenomenon, we have to talk about it, there are a lot of people who really get a dividend from the war, because someone there rents apartments for three times more than they could before war, someone there still makes money from something, well, they pay a little for the state, a little for themselves, somehow more for themselves, as it turned out, well, of course, this is all very bad, and this again brings us back to... that after all, the burden of war must be distributed, well, somehow more fairly, apparently, it must be distributed to all, well, to everyone, and therefore it cannot

be a question of any reservation at all, therefore state officials must also serve , all without any reservation, well, because they are all interchangeable, they released this girl, i think there is just a queue, it’s fine, there is no problem, you know, i think that there are just a bunch of them, well, that is, somewhere like it should be, but these stories, they are not for anyone, no one is taught anything, because we see all these stories non-stop during the last two years of the war, when officials are absolutely pissed off at the fact that there is a war in the country, they buy luxury cars, they buy a little work for the state, a little for themselves, sew a little, steal a little, corrupt a little. they take a little bit of bribes, well , that is, one gets the impression, as one foreign publication once wrote, that they are trying to get the most, because they

understand that in this, in this story, they can take everything, and then it may not be. oleksiy, how do you think these people should be brought to their senses, and i don't want to engage in moralizing, but in this situation. it all looks a little bit very strange when government officials behave like this and have no shame at all, and they have no sense that, that there is a completely different life, and it is not so luxurious and, well, look, you can't to be, so to speak, a person cannot behave... one way in one place and completely different in another you can't change a place, people, a person, we saw it in peacetime, that these people lived a completely different life than the majority, the majority

of the country, and to expect that they will somehow change their life in the conditions of a large-scale invasion, not to mention the war at all, then i think that these are completely naive hopes, they can only be brought to consciousness by ... er, real, so to speak, real punishments for abuse, because if you know, a person says that he works a little for the state, well now she doesn't work anymore, that's how she understands the state, in general she works only for herself, well that is why should the state spend money on these people, you know, we have, in principle, where to put this money, the same with the so-called parties. for the collection of drones, well, let's just collect for drones without a party, in principle, the same money will be, and you can

also direct the money spent on the party somewhere else. for more reasonable purposes. thank you oleksiy. there is actually nothing to discuss here, it seems to me that we are all united about the fact that, well, the country should live, and the officials should live in the country where, where it goes war, and behave accordingly, in this way without excessive moralizing, if they do not understand this, then they really have to work not a little for the state and a little for themselves, let them work for themselves, but here, you know, here it is more important than ever. in general, well, some example from the very top, well, that is, it should go from there anyway, because it is a vertical, which, roughly speaking, was somehow brought to their senses by their superiors, if their superiors do not bring them to their senses, they do not show their personal this example, well, then we see such stories, well, all ours the problem is that we have literally until they are mobilized into the army...

half of the elite, the real elite, not the creative one, which is practically all fighting in our country, but the economic one, which is until it is all mobilized, nothing will happen, well , on the other hand, i will remind you, i will remind you how zelenskyi's presidency began with the story that a robber will come out of here, and i will now bring order to the customs, that is the customs, correct , as i understand it, for $ 200. that is, again, you can say whatever you want in public, but if it is not brought to a logical end and people are not, well , at least not fired from their jobs for such things, then it will only be, so to speak, shaking , well, yes, we remember how zelensky asked a customs official somewhere

in... in uzhgorod or somewhere in the first month or the second month of his presidential term, he asked him: what iphone does he have, and what kind of car does he have, and where did he get his lexus, well, that is, a lot of this was said then, that i am to all of you i will show you how to live, i will show you how to live honestly, well, actually 5 years of the presidency, this is the illustration of the vision of the chief inspector of lviv customs, when she does not even realize, does not even think about the fact that... to say such things on camera, that this is also a moveton, that what in general, even if you have a card, don't flaunt it, don't show it there in the center of lviv and say, i'm the goddess of the lviv customs here, and i absolutely they'll be mad at all the rules, well, this is also a very big question, which is obvious, after the war will be especially acute when people return from the war and when those who fought

will look... at these ladies with dogs, with leashes from gucci for 200 dollars or with cards, well, you know, i wouldn't wait , when they come back from the war, because a lot of them won't come back, you know, and to wait for them to abuse those people, just showing that they're all right, well, i don't think that these people will actually wait for that, what when the war ends we will... if they don't want more, so to speak tragic consequences. thank you alexey, another short topic, i think we are just exchanging thoughts about this global flood, all-russian flood orenburg and orsk, and it looks like a vivid illustration of what is really happening in russia, i know olya that you retweeted their there are comments that they say in general that it's pretty

dirty. maybe you covered this topic in the chronicles of the information war, tell me, how do they first perceive, how do you perceive this deluge that these cities have reached, and orsk and orenburg and there, it seems to me, this water has already gone to the mound, it is mismanagement, roadlessness, irresponsibility, everything that is possible, well, there are several such layers of perception. well, the first layer of perception is actually what russian propaganda is trying to do about it, well, it’s just that it’s a natural disaster that could not have been predicted, it all happened like that, well, that’s the main thing, and woe betide us, let’s save everyone and that's all, there is such a next level of perception, it also spills out a little in russian media...