"judicial reform in ukraine is ongoing, soon, a qualification assessment of all the officials of the fimida must be conducted for compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics. obviously, not all of them will pass it, and until this happens, judges continue to surprise us not only with sky-high fortunes, but also extremely absurd decisions. others are running away from their positions until the qualification commission found them unfit and dismissed them in disgrace. today we will tell you about those who stood out, and first the news. the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge valery malkov of the kuznytsiv city court, who was prosecuted for driving under the influence. for the first time, malkov was caught drunk driving in august 2019. then he collided with a vase while driving a foreign car in varasha. at the same time, malkov had clear signs of alcohol intoxication, but he refused...

i'm going to visit, wait, what are you filming me for? the court found malkov guilty, imposed a fine of uah 10,000 and deprived him of the right to drive a car for a year. however, that year in august, the servant of themis was again jumped drunk. the supreme council of justice decided that such behavior of malkov is not compatible with the status of a judge. another traitor judge was sent for dismissal. the second disciplinary chamber of the supreme council of justice recommended the dismissal of serhiy varniak, judge of the kherson district administrative court. in september in 2022, due to

the russian occupation of kherson, the judge was assigned to work at the odesa district administrative court, and varniak never got there, instead, after the de-occupation of kherson , he moved to the still temporarily occupied left bank of the kherson region, where he received russian identification number and pension. the final decision on the dismissal of the traitor from the post of ukrainian judge must now be made by the supreme council of justice. in ukraine, a complete reboot of the judicial system is underway. contests are held to fill vacant positions in the courts of the first and appellate instances, the selection of judges for the constitutional court is ongoing. in parallel with these processes, there is also a qualification assessment for the suitability of the positions of the current servants of themis. especially resourceful ones try to escape retirement as much as possible earlier, so that they are not expelled for violations. after all , the judicial resignation is not just a pension, it is the extension of immunity and huge lifetime cash payments from the state. but until it was the turn to administer justice, still. there remain judges with very dubious

reputations and sky-high fortunes that cannot be explained by official incomes. this is lyudmila kropyvna, a judge of the northern commercial court of appeal. recently, she is very afraid for her safety, forbids journalists to film her despite the fact that she is a public figure. and according to our information travels accompanied by security. we don't know what scared the judge so much. but we really want to know about the origin of the funds that allowed her to purchase a large house in the suburbs of kyiv. elite cottage town in kozen. koncha zaspa is a favorite residence of the political and business elite of ukraine. there is a lake, a river, parks, private beaches and, in general, a very picturesque place. at the end of 2021, lyudmila kropyvna bought a 260 m2 house with a gazebo and a pool and 20 acres of valuable land here. houses of the same area with a large with a living room and a fireplace, a kitchen, a dining room, three bedrooms and a sauna, they cost here in the neighborhood a judge from one. dollars, however

, the price of ludmila kropyvna's house turned out to be almost eight times lower and amounts to slightly more than uah 5 million. it should be noted that by law, public officials, including judges, are not entitled to receive individual discounts other than those granted to everyone. so, if an official buys something at below -market prices, it can be considered an improper reward, or simply a bribe. and this is another northern judge svitlana aldanov of the commercial court of appeal, and she. also has a habit of underestimating the value of property. a few years ago, she bought a toyota rav-4 for allegedly $600, when the market value reached from $25. today, svitlana aldanova is a millionaire judge, according to the declaration, she has almost uah 2 million in her bank account, and keeps another 2 million in cash. lyudmila kropyvna and svitlana aldanova made illegal decisions in the high-profile case of raiding in favor of the russians of one of the giants of the ukrainian economy, poltava mining and beneficiation plant. at the same time

, the elite property of kropyvna in kozyna appeared precisely after she, as a member of the collegium , began to consider the case of the transfer of gzk shares to raiders. the third judge from the panel is larisa zubets, who has already changed. her last name is still ivanova, she managed to escape to retirement. if you cannot expect a fair court decision, then how can you do business in ukraine, and if there is also the russian factor, well, it creates, especially now during the war , an additional negative connotation. businessmen associated with the kremlin have systematically pressured and destroyed the mining and metallurgical business, which is extremely important for the economy of ukraine, and the undemanding ukrainian business, for more than one year, in particular through the courts. themis blessed raiding attempts even in the midst of war, despite billions in taxes that enterprises pay to the budget. ferexpo group, which includes the poltava mining and processing plant, paid almost 8 billion hryvnias in 2022-23 alone and is one of the largest

ukrainian exporters. in september 2022 the board of judges of the northern commercial court of appeal, consisting of kropyvna zubets and aldanova, by its resolution contrary to the law dated gave more than 40% of poltava gzk shares to former shareholders who owned the company more than 20 years ago. four offshore companies that were part of the russian group vs energy. that is, in the midst of russia's full-scale war against ukraine, almost half of the shares went to the russians. the current deputy chairman of the russian state duma oleksandr babakov, together with his partner, tried to seize control of the company yevhen giner, president of the central sports club of the russian army. judges bucks gladly helped them in this. the decision is made absolutely well with a corruption component, huh. and the fact that the courts make absurd decisions very often. and in

essence, investors and business owners can hope, at best, on a higher instance, on the supreme court, or in general on international courts. that certainly doesn't mean it's normal. babakov is known not only for the fact that he voted for the annexation of crimea, the introduction of troops into ukraine and the recognition of terrorists ldnr. he is currently wanted by the sbu and under sanctions of ukraine, the usa and the eu. and in the united states, a criminal case is being investigated for the implementation of hostile political plans against ukraine and the united states. alexander babakov. this is a pensioner who, as a deputy, voted for the annexation of crimea. currently there is. this is the deputy chairman of the state duma of russia, this is a co-advisor, this is putin's confidant. the second person is also a citizen of the russian federation, yevhenii giner. he is the owner of the csk football club. cska stands for central sports club of the army of the russian federation. giner

is also wanted and under us sanctions. in addition, he is a partner of the russian corporation rostec, which exports military products and is headed by an old friend of vladimir putin. serhii chemizov in the fall of 2023, the sbu informed chemizov, who, in particular, supplies daggers for attacks on ukraine, about the suspicion of financing russian aggression. all aircraft that are produced are produced at our enterprises, all brands of aircraft. it is an engine company that makes everything engines, including for space, aircraft, helicopters and ships, both civil and military. ukrainian state bureau. directly calls babakov and giner the leaders of the organized crime group archers, as stated in the joint investigation of the scheme program on radio liberty and the scaner project. according to the conclusions of the sbi, this group of russian citizens illegally obtained a number of objects of ukrainian critical infrastructure

through fraud. poltava gzk turned out to be another strategic object, control over which the kremlin tried to seize businessmen, wallets of russian aggression, and the ukrainian troika helped them in this. judges, pakhs panel consisting of lyudmila kropyvna, svitlana aldanova and larisa zubets. this is how, apparently, after bribing the ukrainian feymida, the leader of the raiders, the vice-speaker of the russian state duma babakov, disposed of the stolen ukrainian assets in the program of the propagandist solovyov. turning to the new territories, i want to say that the expenses should not go there from the budget of russia. we must consider these areas as economically ready to be there implement production there is the future income of these territories. and russia, in particular, and we should invest there, not based on our budget capabilities, but based on the capabilities of the economy of these territories. however , luzhnikovsky did not manage to manage the poltava mining and beneficiation plant for a long time. last year, forkspo managed to defend its rights. the grand chamber

of the supreme court annulled the decision of the northern court of appeal of the supreme court, in fact recognizing that judges kropyvna, zubets and aldanova, giving the enterprise to the russians, mistakes were made. they are without any legal grounds. and, contrary to authority, changed the subject of the dispute and went beyond the scope of reviewing the case. the motivational and resolutive part of the pachs ruling were contradictory and based on mutually exclusive conclusions. also, a trio of judges at... headed by the nettle intervened in the ownership of the farexpo company, replacing the non-existent shares with existing ones in the ruling, and also knowingly and baselessly ignored government prescriptions and legal norms, and instead of evidence, they were guided by assumptions. at the same time, taking 40% of the shares from the legal owners, the judges left the claimant and third parties in possession of the funds received by them for the sold and contested shares - 27 million dollars. so, thanks to the pakhs decree , kremlin businessmen not only got rich. for 27 million, but also, in fact, those awarded by the troika received nettle shares

of poltava gzk with a total value of uah 1 billion 241 million for free. therefore, a year ago, by the decision of the great chamber of the supreme court, the decision of kropyvna altanova and zubets was canceled, and the shares of poltava gzk were transferred to the rightful owner ferexpo company. private center sections partners and press network companies to meet the share. annulled the decision of the northern commercial court of appeal dated september 12, 2022 in case 910/251/20. interestingly, shortly after the supreme court put an end to this case, the four offshore companies of the raiders self-liquidated. everything points to the fact that they were created specifically for this arrangement, and the decision of the pags panel is due to the corrupt influence of the russians. what we haven't brought in since the 19th year reform the authorities did not clear the bar of first instance of the first instance and the second instance of the court and the first instance and the appeal, there are many

examples of absolutely, well, let's say, absurd decisions, abuse of the decision, and when it turns out that they can organize similar raids on this company, when they can seize and, in fact, take the management hostage, when can block, paralyze conscious activity, which... very significantly discriminates ukraine in the world. ferrexpo is listed on the london stock exchange, and the poltava gzk is considered one of the most attractive investment objects on the markets. therefore, the actions surrounding him are not only a blow to the economy of the state in the midst of russian aggression, but also to the investment climate of ukraine. an attempt to put pressure on foreign investors may also affect international aid to ukraine in wartime conditions. and illegal actions of pocket judges in these fights without rules endanger the entire judicial system. reform, which is a key condition for ukraine's further movement towards the european

union. today i have everything, it was judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you want to to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you in exactly a week. good bye. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. two hours to learn about the war and how the world lives. two hours to keep up with economic and sports news. two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become like family to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast. project for intelligent and caring. espresso in the evening. join the ranks of the 100th separate mechanized

brigade of the armed forces of ukraine. protect yours. the result of their work is our safety. they, the boys from volyn, proved that everyone can be a warrior. strong in spirit, they appreciate the ability to stand side by side with their brothers and sisters, all the way to holy victory. everyone who pilots a uav understands it, prepares, treats, repairs, winds kilometers of roads, fills piles of documents, significantly strengthens. those who cover the enemy with heavy fire and return our native land meter by meter. join the ranks of the hundredth individual mechanized brigade of the armed forces of ukraine. let's stick together. glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko, i greet everyone and wish everyone good health. for the next two hours, we will talk about ukraine, the world, the war, and ours. victory today in the program. battle during the time of yar. the russians

are intensifying mechanized attacks against the backdrop of a shortage of personnel and ammunition in the armed forces. is there a threat of a breakthrough? waiting for bold decisions. while american aid is blocked, the european union is going to expand military support to ukraine. mobilization without demobilization approved parliament. the bill is waiting for the president's signature, will the new legislation help win the war? we will talk about this and other things with our guests for the next hour. oleksandr kraev and politician boryslav bereza. the second part of our program will feature journalists olga len and oleksiy mustafin. however, before starting our today's big conversation, let's watch a video of repelling the attack of the russian invaders near chasovoy yar. heavy fighting is currently taking place there.

let's watch the video of how the enemies got. glory to the armed forces of ukraine, glory to the heroes. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us on social media and youtube.

please take part in our survey. today we ask you about this, would you trust the police? military after the war, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have a special opinion, please write in the comments under this video, if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you would trust the power of the military police after the war (0800-211-381), no 08021-382, all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will sum up this vote. we have our first guest on the phone, this is volodymyr tsibulko, political analyst, writer, people's deputy of ukraine, of the fourth convocation, mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, congratulations, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, let's start our conversation with the law on mobilization, because on april 11 the verkhovna rada ukraine approved the draft law on

mobilization in general, but the parliamentarians removed from the document the provision that would have provided for the demobilization of military personnel. after 36 months of service, we will now briefly remind our tv viewers, in fact, that this bill contains the main provisions: those with limited fitness and those who received the second and third groups of disabilities after february 24 , 2022, in addition to military personnel, must re -pass the vlk. all conscripts must clarify their data in the tsk, cnap or electronic cabinet within 60 days. to all men it is necessary to have a military one with you. medical document and show it at the request of authorized law enforcement officers. men who do not update their data or evade mobilization may have their driving privileges restricted. consular services will be limited to conscripts abroad until they update their data. the provisions on rotation and demobilization, as i said, after 36 months, will be spelled out in

a separate law that will be passed later. mr. volodymyr, what will the descendants be like. of these changes to the mobilization legislation and to the procedure mobilization, well, the first for society, and the second for war? well, first of all, for war, for war, constant and uninterrupted training of specialists is necessary, especially since the war is moving into a more high-tech phase, the training of such specialists will have to be conducted much longer, and secondly, in... brigades, in many brigades, now, well, about 40% of combat-ready personnel , which means that they must be replenished as soon as possible, it is desirable to preserve the professional backbone of the brigades, it is very difficult, because most of the class specialists are continuously sitting on

at the front for two years, and if you don't come up with at least some kind of rational rotation, here we are about... we remember the 17th-18th year, there for six months on the line of hostilities, and then the brigade was taken to rest. now, of course, the intensity of the war is much higher, so it is necessary to find some form of financial stimulation, or, accordingly, more frequent rotations, because, first of all, it is felt that there is a lack of high-class specialists in all kinds of electronic warfare in the army , further, well... well, the introduction of the aviation component is expected, in a few months, in two, probably months,

aviation will start working, aviation requires a huge infrastructure and engineering personnel, especially in the area of ​​aviation weapons, so there are a lot of challenges, but at the same time , the assault brigades are just exhausted and you need to somehow understand, let them rest , otherwise... just people at the limit of possibilities, this is simply burning out, so to speak, the most valuable personnel, the most experienced, and it will be expensive for the armed forces. mr. volodymyr, i wanted to ask your attitude to the fact that, in principle, everyone the amendments that were also proposed by the people's deputies during the last two months, they were actually ignored, except for... the committee ones, and it looks like the draft law submitted by the government on december 26 , 2023, could be completely voted on

in january, for example, or in february, and time was simply lost to develop these and to prepare these amendments, and they, they, well , they just simply did not enter this law for one simple banal reason, because the deputies from the servant... they were in the session room hall on april 10, they did not vote for these amendments, these amendments were simply all canceled as they did not receive the appropriate number of votes, why was it necessary to follow all these procedures, why did it all have to be arranged and show that the parliament was deciding something , when in the end everything was actually decided outside the parliament, well, here is a very important political moment, the fact is that such laws are. as a law on mobilization, they should be a law on justice and a law on national unity before an external threat. actually, uh, the quality

of the debate on this bill and the votes cast for this bill are very unconvincing. 227 votes is, in essence, such a psychological experiment, uh, even the position of zelensky himself is important here, because one of the first... comments that appeared after the adoption of this law, zelensky himself says that the current legislation suddenly appears to be enough for the petitioners to be recognized as petitioners, but did this voted law bring more justice to the people in the military, the current people in the troops, it was in the troops that they hoped for 36 months, as a certain, well, the term of such a cut-off when... she should

rest for at least a year, otherwise she simply and professionally collapses and is exhausted to the extent that, well , human psychology, she can't stand all this, but the fact that this norm about demobilization was not included in this law, that's what. well, in principle, there is the absence of this, well, conditional gingerbread, that is, for those who have already mobilized and for those who are going to mobilize, because it is not clear, mobilization continues, but no one sets these terms, those who are already at the front do not understand when their service will end, when they will be able to demobilize, and those whom they are trying to mobilize, they also don't understand for... how long they go, or for the rest of their lives, or until some injury or some statue, mr. serhiu, the most embarrassing thing in this whole story is that the legislator

refused to make a mandatory surcharge for the stay on the front line, well, it was recorded there the amount, in my opinion, is uah 70,000, and the legislator refused to introduce it, and the cabinet of ministers introduced it, well, formed it in the form of a resolution, a resolution is not a law. i.e., considering how non-compulsory the ukrainian cabinet is in relation to the military, its refusal to include a financial incentive in the law also looks like a mockery of common sense, in general , a progressive scale of surcharges should be introduced, for example, after 12 months it is necessary it would be 50% to increase additional payments to the military, after 24 by another 50%, plus everyone there is remembered in the 17-18 years

for destruction enemy techniques were good premiums, where are these premiums now? i believe that they should be introduced, we do not have answers to these questions, but we see that despite all the complexity of this law, it has been passed, and obviously the president will sign it, or if he does not sign it, then he must return it with a veto with his own, well use the veto and come back with your own. amendments in this process, which took place during the last few days, we still did not see these leadership positions of the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine, anyway, he was not the one who convinced the people's deputies of ukraine to vote, before that he recorded a video and said: "well, now we are having conversations with the parliament so that they, that is, this is zelensky's distancing from this law, from the mobilization process itself, enhanced mobi process".

because now there will be rules for all military conscripts for those with limited fitness , they have already been canceled now either fit or not fit, that is, a lot of questions will arise, but it is not clear whose side these questions should be put on the side of the leadership the armed forces of ukraine, they say, we are only the customers of the mobilized, the verkhovna rada passed this law, the supreme commander says we are re'. that is, why do you think there was no political leadership in this process, even though the process of mobilization is a matter of life and death of ukrainians, the question of the future of ukraine, the present and the future as well. well, first of all, mobilization takes place according to the political decision of the political leadership, not the decision of the military. secondly, the completely comical behavior of zelensky, as if...

he, no, by introducing this bill, in the future he will not sign it, because he will sign this bill, or he will not sign it, here the question is also an intrigue, if he signs this bill, then he is a co-author of this bill, if they want to shift responsibility to the military that the military ordered such a law is not true, the primacy of the politician is the politician. always in the management of the troops, it always remains, the military are only executors of political decisions, no matter how much zelensky twists it, but let’s remember absolutely the paradoxical history of lowering, with the law on lowering the bar of mobilized from 27 to 25

years, the law was not signed by zelenskyi for more than a year, well, as far as i remember, the norms for signing the law are a month, that is, two weeks, a month, a month, in fact, the law was not signed for a year, and in the end zelensky signed it, even this law, it is not corrupt, it really divides society into those, well, into serfs and non-serfs, in fact, because it is very, very... consistent and er, i would say anti-constitutional in spirit, that is maybe there is no letter of anti-constitutionality, but the spirit of anti-constitutionality is that a part of society is placed in absolute inequality, an unequal position with the other part, but if zelensky did not get away with this, he would have to side with the military and be a co-author and bear the full burden.

responsibility for this, well, i would say, not very popular law. well, while the people are discussing a new law on mobilization. a global peace summit is being prepared in switzerland, and putin and lukashenko, who were yesterday met in moscow, criticize the world community and say that without russia, the issue of the future of ukraine cannot be resolved, and putin insists on returning to the project of the so -called istanbul agreement, which was developed by the negotiating teams. ukraine and russia at the beginning of a large-scale invasion, let's hear what putin has to say about the upcoming peace summit in switzerland. the idea of ​​holding a conference in switzerland is being promoted. we are not invited there, moreover , they believe that there is nothing for us to do there. at the same time, they say that there is nothing without us cannot be resolved.