more support for ukraine, my call will be clear: send more to ukraine. denmark is a strong example of how to provide all of its artillery to the ukrainians, but they also have a specific plan to replenish their own stockpiles of weapons. mr. general, you rightly said that the ukrainian authorities should also demonstrate to our western partners their aspirations and efforts in order to provide for their own. army, including its own weapons, its own production, ammunition, and do everything to make the west understand what ukraine is doing to the maximum, you have already mentioned the changes to the mobilization law, and this is probably one of those cases when our american partners also talked about the fact that you are streamlining the mobilization system, or make it more clear, why do you think these changes to the decrees are taking so long? four or five months, that is

, time was lost, and as a result , the same bill was passed, almost the same bill that was submitted, these amendments did not pass, or was it necessary to make such a big political show out of this, the result of which could be, well, let's say yes, rejection part of the society there some norms of this law, non-acceptance, you know enough, you said it... enough is still optimistic, i will say so, because the process for the sake of the process, this is the most terrible thing, and not for the sake of the result, these green samurai, whose main goal is not , and the main thing, to be honest, they have already had enough, and this is their constant pr, they are thinking about winning the election, which is not yet clear when it will be, or about winning this war, this is about this issue, and they are thinking about ratings, and not about victory, therefore... the whole answer lies

on the fact that they have a basic principle, as one of the classics once said, that unfortunately, the self-confidence of amateurs is the constant envy of professionals, so when professionals look at these self-confident amateurs, they understand that this green government already considers itself professionals, meanwhile, they remained amateurs, and their experiments with our people are, you know, quite bloody, their inaction, their very... confidence of lulling the people, that there will be no war, that the most important thing is to allocate money for construction, well, here is a great example, if so, at least 15% of the money that was spent on large-scale construction, was spent on the purchase of zenit missile systems ourselves, then we would significantly strengthen our defense, well, we would actually significantly strengthen, unfortunately, the value priorities of this government are in making money, and not... in raising the level of the country's bronze capacity,

as well as the failed option with the american law, where we would simply be given military weapons, no, it still came down to giving us money , because for money you can be forgiven for pinching a little, here are real examples of what we need and what values ​​guide the people you elected in 19 . thank you, mr. general, for the conversation, it was serhiy kryvonos, major general. stock friends, we work live on the tv channel and on facebook. for those who are currently watching espresso there, as well as on our youtube platforms, we are live. please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey. today we ask you about this, whether you consider the russian orthodox church terrorist organization? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, please write your own opinion in the comments under this video. if you're watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you think so. roc

terrorist organization 0800-211-381 no 0800-211-382 all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. oleksiy goncharenko, people's deputy of ukraine, president of the parie committee, will be in touch next issues of migration and refugees. mr. oleksiy, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations, i can say, as i just answered the question you asked the audience an hour ago... are also guilty of the crimes committed by the putin regime. today, paria adopted several resolutions, you have already mentioned the russian one.

the orthodox church and its amendment, but two resolutions that are very important are about not recognizing the legitimacy of the russian leader putin, and the country, and paria addressed the country. members of the council of europe and countries observers, to stop all contact with the criminal putin regime is one resolution, and another that russia's oil refineries and oil infrastructure are legitimate targets for ukraine's defense forces. please explain to us what this means? this means that in terms of putin's legitimacy, it means that he will not be called the president, he will not be addressed by the president, and thus his status. will not be recognized after may 7, when pseudo-president putin will be inaugurated, do i understand correctly? look there's one thing which please don't forget, when we talk about the decisions of the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, all these decisions are of a recommendatory nature, and the parem has no right

to tell germany, france, great britain or hungary exactly what to do, but... the parem recommends, further, the countries themselves are determined, so this is the tool that ukrainian diplomacy has now received, not only ukrainian, but also all our allies in order to clamp down on putin, in order to recognize him as illegitimate, in order to prevent his diplomatic maneuver, of foreign policy, and how we will use this tool and what we will do, and what we will achieve with it, well, that will only show. unfortunately, if there was such a body in the world that together said, putin is illegitimate, putin has disappeared, well, there is no such body, it does not exist, but this decision, it gives us essential tools to further this issue of putin's illegitimacy , inadmissibility,

inadmissibility of contacts with him, then it's about promoting and trying to implement. on different platforms, it must be understood that it concerns refineries, by the way, not only oil refineries, the oil and gas industry of russia in general, is recognized as the one that actually finances this war, and therefore is not an object of civilian infrastructure, but is actually a military object, a legitimate target for ukraine. why is this important? well, because the criticisms that we heard, unfortunately, even from the representatives of the united states of america, can now be answered, you see. and the couple says that this is no civilian infrastructure, and there is the un that says: do not touch civilian infrastructure, but the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe and the council of europe tell us that this is our legitimate goal, well, for the un this is good, before that it is generally enough for russia, sorry, for

the united states of america, well, obviously, they have slightly different goals, but still it will be more difficult for them to promote this method that concerns the church. why this is important is because russia is actively using the issue of alleged persecution of christians in ukraine in a campaign against ukraine. do you remember, tucker carlson, interviews and other things, when they did this type of putin is a christian leader and everything else, and just to give an answer to this and to all those who do not think about the details, you know, well, relatively speaking, some christian lives there, i don’t know there in spain, and he does not think that... as he is told, look, in ukraine the church is banned, he is like that, oh my god, what a horror, here is the answer to him, no, no, in ukraine, the council of europe, which includes spain, recognized that that this is putin's tool, well, okay, then everything is clear, that is, we created today with these resolutions

several tools to be used further, by themselves, they do not change anything, but using them in reporting our position. in the struggle on other platforms, in cases at the european court of human rights, because the decisions of the couple are binding for the ecthr, regarding their consideration when issuing its verdicts, and this is really important, but if we are talking about the tool, about this reality resolution on oil refineries and the oil and gas industry of the russian federation, does this open up opportunities for our... western partners to provide us with long-range weapons that can hit these refineries and the oil refining facilities of the russian federation, and our western partners: listen, the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe has generally recognized that this is a legitimate goal, and in this way it

opens up an opportunity for our western partners to provide us with those weapons, well , for example, for that scholz in order for him to give weapons that will fly there, so it definitely gives them ... certain arguments and creates a certain pressure on such politicians as the same scholz, who is wavering . well, but here it is necessary understand that our western partners do not give us weapons to attack even military facilities on the territory of the russian federation itself. no one ever had any questions, but they still do not want their weapons to be used to strike even military facilities and military bases on the territory of russia itself, but only to be used on the occupied ukrainian territory, so here there is this nuance, but i repeat, well, today, it's nothing, you know, how something doesn't happen every now and then it happened there, it all happens in small steps, but here... i pressed here, here, here, here, here, and once we came to some decision, which is already of serious importance, well

, we received a number of such decisions today. well, and, in addition, pare adopted a resolution on support for the reconstruction of ukraine, stefanchuk, ruslan stefanchuk, the head of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, was in the couple, and before the voting of the resolution, he spoke yesterday before, uh, the participants of the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe. in front of the meps and called to direct all efforts for joint struggle against the russian invaders. let's listen to what stefanchuk said. the time has come for quick decisions and actions. it is time for responsible leadership. the time has come to choose in favor of decisive, united resistance to the russian terrorist. and i want us all to finally understand one truth. peacekeeping games, lack of weapons, imperfect sanctions, delay in

the confiscation of russian assets, lack of mechanisms of responsibility and punishment make non-humans stronger, this resolution has a paragraph on the confiscation of russian assets, on the freezing of assets, transfer to restoration of ukraine, this is also a recommendation, as i understand it... of course, in the future, everyone will, well, refer to the pare resolution, make this decision, or convince their governments that it should be done? all pere's decisions are of a recommendatory nature, you just need to understand it once and that's all, but this decision is important here, by the way, all the decisions we listed, both on the church, and on the oil refinery, and on putin's illegitimacy, all and... on the restoration of ukraine and the confiscation of russian assets to accept unanimously, was not found

not a single delegate is left to vote against, or at least abstain. yes, there some delegates from some countries simply did not participate, not only did they not vote, but it is still indicative that there was not even one vote, i remind you that hungary, armenia, torechchina are part of the pare, but not a single vote. that was filed against it, or even received, was not, it is important, so now today there is really another tool about pressing the issue of asset forfeiture, still the decisions will be to be taken, if these assets are located in switzerland, the decision will be taken by sovereign switzerland, if these assets are located in belgium, then the decision will be taken by belgium together with the european union. which it is a part of, and so on, so these decisions can only be made by countries, but now we have received

another tool to say, well, let's go, well, the couple has already voted, well , all the more so because they actually voted for it and representatives of these countries, that is, the belgians voted for it, the belgian deputies, well, now time in the parliament to implement this further, whether it will happen or not, i cannot say how and at what speed it will happen, but the fact that we have come one step closer to implementing this is a fact, as far as i understand mr. oleksiy, the most important thing is the precedent, that is, if one, one or two countries start doing it, that is, it will go further in western europe, isn't it, yes, i absolutely think so too, i just turned to the minister of foreign affairs of liechtenstein today, she is here spoke, the fact is that now they are presiding here in turn, now it's liechtenstein's turn. and so i turned to her so that, uh, really, for example, liechtenstein became

the first example, the country is small, at the same time there are russian assets there, and that let's please directly make such a decision and show everyone an example, well, we'll see if it will actually happen or not, but it is really important that at least one european country starts doing it... i think it will finally break the resistance and the fears that exist regarding these decisions. very soon in the congress of the united states of america. should begin considering the issue of providing funding or assistance to ukraine in the amount of 61 billion dollars, four bills or three bills will not be known for sure yet, but these projects will be divided, the biden administration is already ready to consider these separate bills and vote for it,

how do you assess the prospects of voting for this bill, taking into account... the fact that ukraine is in dire need of american help now, and the americans understand that delaying this will lead to catastrophic consequences, to bad consequences, maybe not catastrophic, but to bad consequences, because this aid can reach ukraine in 45 days from the moment of the decision, which is a long enough period in the context of the current efforts of the russians to advance deep into ukrainian territory. no, well, the consequences can be really very bad, this is a key story, well , finally such a window of hope appears, by the way, i said back in december that the window will appear just after the end of march, i will not waste time there now , why, well, but, as you can see, we are such a prediction and forecast, well

, it came true, but now the main thing is that the decision it was very important. er, i really hope that it will be voted on saturday, indeed johnson said that he would delay the congress until saturday, because in general the congress was supposed to work only until this friday, and then they did not have time, now it will be done until saturday and on saturday evening , the corresponding vote should take place, well , we will keep our fists, we are helping from our side, as i said, the pariah turned to congress, and the usa is an observer country. in the council of europe, i won't say that it will be of key importance, but it is also a tool, well look, 46 radio countries of europe are already asking and waiting for you, this is also important and there is also such a certain element of pressure in the positive sense of the word, well, let's hope, in principle, right now, before turning it on, i was familiar with the text, because it

is only appeared that we understand, we understand that there is also monetary assistance, but now it is all in the form of a loan. well , we had to be ready for this and in this situation we have nothing to go over here, by the way, let me remind you that the european union constantly provided us with financial aid on credit, it was the united states that gave us financial aid, they just gave it as a grant without return, but now that won’t happen, well, in our conditions , that’s okay, and there are weapons, the key thing for us, but we need to figure out what part is there will go to internal markets, because there... a large part will go to replenish the pentagon's reserves, far from all of it will go to ukraine, well, but in any case, finally, as they say, the flight has touched down, we see that, well, movement has started, in principle, a scheme with different bills, it can to work, in general, this is the fact that ukraine was molded together with the borders, everything else, as soon as it

started, again, well, i just talk to my colleagues from the congress and... that it creates problems, because the border, and what about the border, everything it transformed us, it seems to me that biden then, well, the biden administration made a mistake in october when it submitted this package of aid to ukraine along with the border, it determined the difficult fate of this process, now the separation, it should give an opportunity to vote for our draft law and to that part of the republicans who support us, and it may well turn out to be even... more than half, well, we'll see, and it's definitely more than half of the democrats, and i think that almost all democrats, so in principle, our bill has every chance of getting a very large number of votes, now we'll just to hope that there will not be an attack by trumpists, extreme right-wing republicans who may

somehow try to topple johnson, to do something else, here i hope that... it was not for nothing that i went to trump before this package, enlisted some of his support, well, in the coming days there will be decisive, we are watching, we really hope that it will be done, if the congress votes, then you have to understand, then it will still go back to the senate, because the senate voted in a different way, and now, in order for it to be finally approved, a vote of the senate will be needed , then another 45 days, well, that means it's already somewhere in june, the end of june, and... but it's better than what we have today, well, it's not even comparable. thank you, mr. oleksiy, it was oleksiy goncharenko, people's deputy of ukraine from strasbourg, where parliamentary assembly of the council of europe. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those currently watching on these platforms. please like

this video and vote in our poll. today we are asking you about whether you consider the russian orthodox church to be a terrorist organization. yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have a personal opinion, a separate opinion, please write it in the comments below. this video if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote, if you consider the russian orthodox church a terrorist organization 0800-211381, no, 0800-211-382, all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will summarize this vote. next, we will be in touch with maksym rozumny, political expert, doctor of political sciences. mr. maxim, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. good evening. mr. maksym, let's talk about the situation in the world after the defeat by the west partners and the state of israel, strike iran. on

the night of april 13-14, this happened, more than 300 air targets were shot down, it gave the western coalition, or shall we say, the western partners, a reason to talk about their strength, while in ukraine they are talking about the fact that... our western partners could to do the same for ukraine and close the ukrainian sky from russian missiles and russian shaheds, president zelenskyi says that shaheds in the direction of israel, shaheds in the direction of ukraine, in principle, they fly the same way, including ballistic missiles. as you perceive one such ee... one-sidedness, because iran also did not receive a response from the representatives of the western coalition and israel, that is, this strike was postponed

against iran, and we know the appeals of our western partners not to strike on russian territory, and the restrictions in the use of western weapons to strike the aggressor, what does this mean? eh? if we compare these two situations, we must keep in mind that the history of the issue is different, if we are talking about iran, then an embargo was imposed on this country long ago on the supply of oil and oil products from iran, quite a long time ago, on no such embargo has been imposed on russia yet, but if we return to this situation. with the downed missiles, of course, the western coalition demonstrated its strength, and this is probably

good for the world order, and i would add, by the way, that not only the western coalition, quite a few of these missiles were shot down on the territory of a country neighboring israel, muslim, by the way, the country of jordan, and actually from them... were shot down by the armed forces of jordan itself, its hashemite kingdom, that is, here we see such a consolidated position and determination, in the ukrainian case we see indecisiveness and the lack of a consolidated position, when in nato itself, when in the european union itself, the voices of such politicians as orban, fitzo and others are heard. eh, other voices that do not, no, do not call for similar determination, for example, in the defense of ukraine or even more decisive assistance to ukraine,

on the contrary, there are voices in favor among the western political establishment, including, for example, in the united states, with on the part of a certain part of the republican party, they say that it is not necessary to help ukraine so much, because this we lead to... escalation, i.e. there are double standards and a double understanding of the situation, for the sake of objectivity it should be added that the territory of israel is much smaller than the territory of ukraine, and to protect it, in order to protect it, less resources are needed, or and it is possible to achieve greater concentration, but in this case we are talking about political will, and to complete, so to speak , this brief review of factors, i would say that here... either this will is lacking for similar protection of ukraine, or there is simply some other plan, uh, another understanding of logic and...

the future, so to speak, of the fate of this war, in which, in this plan, there is no clause about a decisive response and a decisive stop to russian aggression. against this background, the president of the united states of america, joe biden, does not believe that iran's attack on israel will turn into a larger -scale war in the middle east. this was said in an interview with nbc news by the coordinator of strategic communication of the national security council of the white house, john. according to him, israel has not yet decided on retaliatory actions. let's hear what kirby had to say. it is up to the israelis to decide what it will be like next step i will say only one thing: president biden has worked very hard since the beginning of this conflict to prevent it from escalating into a larger regional war. that is, the americans, as i understand it, are restraining israel, although, apparently, the state of israel has

a desire. still hit iran or those proxy groups working under iran in the middle east? well , there is no need to doubt israel's determination and the fact that it will find an answer, er, what is called. after all, we were, uh, witnesses over the last, months, uh, how much. looking for a capable israel to respond to , in particular, an attack by the hamas group that took place on its territory, that is , israel does not forgive its enemies and will definitely find the moment and the way that will be the most annoying for its enemies. in this case, it is obvious that this enemy is iran, actually its current regime, about the fact

that we heard a comment from the american administration, it is so likely that it will not develop into a major conflict, since even this attack was iranian, so it would speak, in response to the destruction of the military and high-ranking military personnel, the so -called queer... in the city of damascus, literally the day before, this liquidation was carried out by the israeli forces, so israel warned her against a response, er, more precisely, iran warned israel against such a response, israel has promised to think about how it will respond, that is, this escalation, the transition of the war to a larger

scale, it is today... obviously not in the interests of iran, israel, and especially the united states. now iran has taken advantage of this situation, well, actually, not iran, but him the leadership took advantage of this situation to show strength, i saw, facebook sometimes shows me such propaganda, here they depict an iranian lion tearing the israeli flag, that is, iran has raised its authority. in the anti-israeli circles of the world and so on, i.e. everyone has achieved their goals at the moment, i would only note that in this situation israel has created a precedent and an excuse for itself in case of any revenge and any attack on iran , which he can cause in the future, and

that such plans exist... we are away from time we hear from the world media, and from some sources of information from the israeli security sector. against the background of what is happening in the middle east, german chancellor olaf scholz visited beijing and met with xijin ping. in the social network x, after meeting with the chinese leader, he said that he asked the leader of the people's republic of china to influence russia so that putin withdraws his troops. from ukraine. china's word carries weight in russia, so i asked the siv leader to influence russia so that putin finally stops his crazy campaign, withdraws his troops and stopped this terrible war. we see how european leaders walk around sydzenpynya for...