under sanctions, but they supply, they supply drones, direct drones, china, for example, directly, we do not have such an opportunity to work with china, no company that will buy drones in china simply cannot do it, because there is some directive there internal, that it is not possible to work with ukraine, it can be done through some country over there in europe and so on, invent something, here, but we do not have such an opportunity directly. and i know that our enemy has a number of factories, large-scale factories for the production of anti-aircraft drones and more, so i am sure now well, the ether is not enough to list what they have there, what we have, the main story is that at some points they are a head, higher and half a hull away, if they were ahead of us, they have longer -range lanceet-type drones, super... kam,

hall-type reconnaissance drones, what does this mean, it means that in our direction of the armed forces of ukraine, bpla, the huge task is to overtake the enemy technologically, but to make our drones fly even further, be more accurate, the system was there by homing systems and so on, that is, war, sometimes in me one gets the impression that it does not... so much takes place on the battlefield as in these conventional engineering rooms where various solutions are developed, because our soldiers, for example, we still have a drone, it is like that, it can be used there for with such characteristics and so on, we are hostages of what the engineers have offered us, and now, if there are wider opportunities for the use of drones, it will of course free our hands, in terms of range, for example, accuracy there and so

on, so here is the war of engineering rooms , which is carried out 24 hours a day, that's for sure there will be direct races this year, whoever wins them will have a significant advantage on the battlefield. very briefly, if possible, regarding the promised million drones in the 24th year, the first quarter is already in ukraine and... well, if we divide, relatively speaking, at least into some equal parts, we can say that there is a part of those drones, which are promised, are they not there, or are volunteers delivering them again, that is, how is the situation, if it is not a military secret, i will tell you very briefly, it is not a military secret, a million drones according to my feelings there will be, but this does not mean anything, who said that a million drones is a lot, if the enemy, for example, uses 5 million drones, well , that's why... that's why i would, for example, urge

everyone not to get attached to this number, i would call on the government to contract if there is an opportunity, and there is an opportunity for our manufacturers to produce 2-3 million, if these drones have proven their effectiveness in the battlefield, so there will be a million drones, but this does not mean anything, and plus, i would also pay attention to, well, let's say so, including the quality of these drones, because... a million to a million, but if we get a substandard product, a product that is not used, not needed, well, it can just be done in the trash. such a problem among, let’s say, attack uavs, it also exists, all the guys are aware that there are drones that are more expensive, but they fly and with them you can make a result, and there are drones that are simply technological junk, with them there is little that can be done and so we are very much hoping and waiting. from our

command of quality technological solutions, because in them lies the success of operations when you conduct them. mr. yehor, on april 11 , the verkhovna rada of ukraine adopted a law on amendments to the mobilization procedure in ukraine, it is called a mobilization law, although the law on mobilization has been around for a long time, it is simply an introduction to certain mobilization procedures, you are a person who voluntarily joined the armed forces of ukraine , you are a volunteer, you came to... to the tro, then as a paramedic, then now you manage a group that is operators of unmanned aerial vehicles, and actually, i am interested in your opinion about the content of this law, which can give the armed forces of ukraine a greater flow of mobilized people, and how qualitative these changes are, how much they can significantly affect... mobilization, i will tell you

this, probably a completely unpopular thing in general, but if such, such quality and... there will be reinforcements in the armed forces, we are facing a very bad situation, we are facing a disaster, we have to fight all over the country, we, as soldiers, are very cheering for mobilization, because this is our replenishment, because there are a lot of units that have simply finished, and you can as many as you like to make drones, as much as you want from western partners of technology, well, there is simply no one who will use this technology'. drive and drones are also launched by people, qualified people, and there will be no one to launch them, if everything continues like this, the authorities must be told honestly and clearly that different technologies can be invented, but one way or another we will come to

the fact that we will have to fight everything well , everyone, we rode for a long time on these volunteers, motivated guys, but believe me, they end physically, many of whom are with us are no longer there, or they are there, but the wounded have a huge number of contusions, various other injuries, but they are knocked out, and they are still running out of energy, because the third year of fighting with such intensity is also not easy, but here, and it can be compared to just this war, forgive me for such comparisons, but with a football team, which has a bench... a bad one, and which does not have any red cards yet, and there is no one to replace at all, and here we are in such a situation that it's just banal that there are no people, and it is necessary urgently, necessarily to change something, and if we don't change this approach, well, believe me, after a certain time, i

think that it will be conditionally there for six months, it will be very, very bad, we all talk about victory, but let's still sometimes, well, don't go there propaganda, sometimes speaking. about the possibilities and defeats, so that what we should do or what not to do, so that this defeat does not happen, because, well, such a possibility is also, also simply there, so that everyone realizes it. mr. yehor, there is one more important element of this law or draft law, which made changes to mobilization, there was demobilization, the spokesman of the ministry of defense of ukraine dmytro lazutkin says that in 8 months there will be a new law. why does it take 8 months to write such a law, you, as the person who wrote the law and who passed the laws, can you explain the logic, is this logic understood by those people who are at the front? i didn't understand the logic, moreover, as you

probably all well understand, the military never, even me, never dig around on the internet and line up some, let's say, logical. reaction, the signals are very bad, therefore that when the military is told that friends, there will be mobilization, wait, we will soon adopt the rules of the game, and then they say that it is impossible, why are we talking about it at all, it is a signal that they have been cheated, that is the main thing, a signal that they have been cheated, why then they said, but the first moment, the second moment, we ukrainians still love freedom, we give our lives for it, and freedom is, as a rule... a choice, so ukrainians should draw at least a hypothetical choice and say: friends, because three, five, even seven years, you will have a choice, an opportunity to undergo demobilization, believe me, when the guys hear something like that, it will be an additional motivation, it does not mean that

they will all run to write there a statement of dismissal, not at all, believe me, it is even an overestimated story that they have a normal salary, they already have new fac. many of the ordinary soldiers have already become company members, and sometimes even combatants somewhere, a huge number will remain in the armed forces, but people must be given a choice so that they do not feel like slaves or serfs, that some are driven into the army and there is no way back none, they are waiting for rotation or vacations, while others are there mowing from the army, enjoying themselves in restaurants there and so on, this is actually very demotivating and it is actually dividing the country. on the contrary, the country needs to be stitched together, so the issue of demobilization needs to be solved urgently, so that the guys can clearly answer to everyone, let it be, i say there 5-7 years, but this question needs to be answered. and the people's deputy of ukraine, sbu colonel roman

kostenko, is of the same opinion, who believes that under the condition of constant rotations, the majority of fighters would return to the front after demobilization. let's listen to what roman kostenko said. i know, i am even more sure, talking with the soldiers, that if there was a term there defined there 36 months there yes there 48 and people there would be many people possible. gone, but i'm sure, well, i don't know, the percentage, but according to my feeling, 70-80, after a while, it's a month or two, they would come back, feeling that they rested, because they are motivated, they are patriotic people, who would not be able to stand aside and watch their country fight, so that's exactly the question of this freedom, which needs to be decided that they, well, they are warriors, and not, not slaves, yes. well , this is the opinion of roman kostenko, i hope that those who are currently fighting in

the armed forces of ukraine, and are on the eastern and southern fronts, and in general in the ukrainian army, agree with it. mr. yehor, i thank you for participating in the program, it was yehor firsov, a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine. friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms in youtube and facebook, for those who are currently watching us live, there please subscribe to our pages on... platforms and take part in our vote, because today we are asking you about the legitimacy of putin, do you consider putin a legitimate president of russia? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your comment under this video, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote. if yes, then 0800 211-381, no, 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will summarize it. him voting. next, we have roman tsimbalyuk, journalist, former vlaskor unian in

moscow. roman, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. sergey, congratulations, i am glad. for those who watch us both on tv and on youtube, you have a unique opportunity to subscribe to the millionaire journalist, a person who has collected 1.200 thousand subscribers on youtube, and become the 1.2001 subscriber. and help develop the youtube channel of roman tsymbalyuk, roman, let's start with this legitimacy itself, because this week parye passed a resolution on the recognition of putin's illegitimacy, people's deputy oleksiy goncharenko, who was in strasbourg and watched it on espresso , said that the adoption of a couple of resolutions regarding putin's illegitimacy is a decision that will allow this issue to be pushed forward in the future. the people's arena, let's listen briefly to goncharenko, this is the tool that

ukrainian diplomacy has now received, and not only ukrainian, but also all our allies, in order to clamp down on putin, to recognize him as illegitimate, in order to prevent his diplomatic, foreign policy maneuver , and how we will use this tool and what we will do and what we will achieve with it, well, that will show... only life, unfortunately, if there was such a body in the world that would say, putin is illegitimate, putin disappeared, well, there is no such body, it does not exist, but this decision, it gives us essential tools to further this issue of putin's illegitimacy, inadmissibility, inadmissibility of contacts with him, inadmissibility of contacts with him, further . promote, roman, but how does this decision affect and does it affect the positions at all

putin in the world and in particular in europe? well, it is clear that this is such a declarative thing, and it does not affect the course of the war in any way, and let's decide, regardless of whether we consider the russian maniac to be legitimate or not, the number of missiles, they are launched at us, she is not affected by this will change, and this is an important point, then there is diplomatic work, diplomatic work. activities and so on, there are, let's say, places to work with, well, if we talk about the legitimacy of the russian president, then in general, this topic should be pumped up here, why, because a little more time will pass, it is clear that due to the war, we will not have elections on time, and they will raise the topic of zelensky's illegitimacy, that too. such an aspect that, regardless of how citizens feel about the president, the current

president, we understand that while there is a war, it is quite problematic to organize a vote, although i have heard different opinions on this matter, so when will they be of any use to us, if , or when we hear something hurtful about this , we just need to record that putin has been an impostor since 2008. in they were recorded for two terms, then they started playing a game in a row, well, this is nonsense, then they rewrote the constitution, and so on and so on, well, that is, that is... illegitimate, well , for the russians to note, then they will be told that we did not send you, putin sent you, you are putin's soldier, not a russian soldier, well, this is quite an interesting question, the fact that you say that he constantly rewrote russian legislation, but in addition to all that he is elected in

temporarily occupied ukrainian regions. of the state and it is clear that this and that, and the legitimacy, and the purity of that, even pseudo- elections, it is also called into question, because it turns out that the citizens of ukraine voted for putin, and here for any conscious person, or in europe , or whether in general in the world, well, how, how can citizens of another country elect a president, even if these presidential elections are falsified, but here... well, it is simply written with white threads, or whether white threads are visible, that it is all sewn, and all this legitimacy to be demonstrated, yes the so-called legitimacy of may 7 in the kremlin, it can in principle be called into question, whether or not ukrainian diplomacy needs

to torpedo our partners more about this legitimacy, because you correctly said that... love already said half a month ago that we have questions about zelenskyi's legitimacy, but maybe by may 20-20 we won't have such questions, what he hinted at, i don't know, but he constantly talks about zelenskyi's illegitimacy, and if they are already asking questions about zelenskyi's legitimacy , then don't we need more to more actively promote and promote this thesis that he is not... legitimate, i think that everyone should do their work, well, just the diplomatic corps that works with the word, well, why not, this is one of the aspects of our foreign policy, i i would just like to draw attention to what, well, first of all , the elections on the ukrainian territories have been held since 2014 on the territory of the occupied crimea, and since that moment, all these issues with

putin's legitimacy have been called into question, i think, in fact, and yes i... that diplomats deal with the question of whether the real tsar is real, and the tsar is not real, we have already figured it out, i think we need to think more about what kind of gift we will give to vladimir manyak putin for the inauguration, it is very interesting that the whole russian propaganda team, they believe that we will destroy something by may 7 the crimean bridge, i... i don't know about the plans of our military command, but it seems to me that it would be such a worthy gift, in a brotherly way, well, if, if there was already such an attempt on putin's birthday, remember, october 7, and there was already such a blow, it didn't count because they announced it, quite quickly, yes,

yes, look, on the background of the ongoing debate, the legitimacy, illegitimacy... of putin, what to do with him, to hit russia or not to hit, and as a result, we see time magazine with the cover of navalny's widow, yulia navalnya, and the first interview after her husband's death with journalist simon shuster, the same simon shuster who wrote a book about zelenskyi, and here navalny says that it's too bad that ukrainians don't want to cooperate with to us who oppose the war, what does it say? good russians is a very bad phrase. i think they just don't they want to look for these anti-war russians, but such russians do exist. it is simply difficult to expect that they will go out into the street, because as i said, not all people are heroes, they are ready to resort to various types of struggle, it is important to support these people, i believe that

ignoring them is a mistake of the government of ukraine, so... this is navalny acts as if he is a leader or one of the leaders of the opposition, and is there an opposition at all in russia, well, my opinion is that there are such public figures, and the position is those people who can come to power, and from this point of view there is no position in russia, even these puppet parties like ldpr, they are not a position either, they are just pure. of the russian government, so the so-called people who, because of smart voting or some other nonsense, have a chance to think that they will... someday be elected there, well, it's just delusional, i'm looking at this statement of yulia navalny, here

she is talking about the fact that the ukrainian government is wrong about something, and that they are ready for cooperation, i understand for some kind, whether they are ready, let's understand if you are ready for something, then offer. if you want some kind of support from ukraine, then talk about it too, specific things, in general, even in terms of temperament and before the great war, we were a little different from them, and even more so now, these are general phrases, but with small flashlights during the day or at night, they him, that is , i perfectly understand that there is a dictatorship and , again, these are its expressions. about the fact that not everyone can go out, i'm sorry, she is so stupid that she doesn't understand that the time for rallies and going out has long passed

he left, he is gone, her husband has already been killed, she is about some street over there, i remember, i just want to remind you that once upon a time a whole party structure was created in fbk, in its representative offices, cells, that is, there were real people, so let's define it. and what do you want, if you want to fight for power, then in fact , the honest answer is very simple, all these calls, we are against the war, let's stop the shooting, that's all, that's all stupid, and if they want to get power in russia, then they have to say it a little differently, don't lay down your arms, call for russian soldiers, and use its weapons, turn them against the russian, as we have already found out, illegitimate authorities, russian illegitimate authorities and act accordingly. i want to emphasize

that as far as i know, and i understand this, all the ukrainian special services are looking for russians who are ready to cooperate with us in some way, and the language is not always worth it, that you have to get in there and risk your life to do something, but what else nothing can be done... the time was running out, it has long passed, so if we are wrong about something, then yulia navalna it must be said that i have declared myself the leader of the russian opposition, well, maybe i am wrong, i say that she is nobody, but they have to prove to us that there is some benefit from them, and we will help them, here we have a unit of the rdk, if they decide, or when they decide to go to... moscow, we will help them, we will charge all the bcs, give them out, charge them, refuel tanks, or mercedes, whatever they will drive, depending on the situation, you can

do that, you know, something like that such a reproach to ukraine that we did not appreciate something there from their point of view, but excuse me, these underdogs, they don't even imagine. er, nothing about my country, about russia. let me remind you that when navalny boarded the plane from germany, i met vnukov at the airport in moskviza, but the plane flew to another airport, and he was detained there, and he never got out of prison. i will just remind you of the chronology of the event, they flew to think that his russians after the movie about the putin palace. will be brought to the kremlin, well, if they thought so, then they really do not know this state, so once again i want to emphasize, it seems to me that we also do not talk about it much, that

we do not treat russians through the lens of a passport, in fact, well, at least i, i think you will agree with me, we have people who are now in the territory of ukraine with a russian passport, and who are no different from... them, we should not look for any good russians, a good person is not a profession, if you have any suggestions, you come out with them, if it will benefit us all, the use of our state, your return to the russian federation, we will always find a common language , but these are statements that this is ukraine something is wrong, the fact that we do not pray for navalny, well, we have reasons for this, and i understand that a person was killed. but we won't forget, sorry, probutrobot, why not because we are spiteful, but because at that moment navalny and this company, his team.

they legitimized the war against us, that's all, as they say just business, if you change your approaches, and we will change our approaches, i, for example, will stop using the word crimea not a sandwich, but if you don't do it and some types here you are for us owe something, we don't owe you anything, go to moscow, you are right, because... really what i hear and what i read in navalny's interview, i have the feeling that she is not the that she, she not only does not understand what is happening in russia, she does not understand what is happening in ukraine, although she has enough opportunities to make a picture of what is happening in our country, she lives abroad and all available resources to her 'is. another rather short topic, this all-russian

flood. across the urals, orsk, orenburg, whatever the mound is already going under the water, what, what does this mean that russia was actually holding on to these things like that, on shit and sticks, just all these dams that are there now, you, you cannot say as a presenter, and i can eat as much as i can, from shit and piles, i simply could not formulate whether. but it is not possible to come up with a clearer wording, well, the truth is, everything is even more clear for the russians, because everything is like that there, please tell me, well, this means that they are not inside the country, that this whole system is decrepit, it is the same as these dams that at some point in time all that is there, it will collapse very quickly, and this autocracy and dictatorship that exists, it

can also break through like this. just like that dam in vorsk, maybe, maybe not, here, you see, it can happen, the water will go down there right now, and these people will be told, who are not the subject of anything, of any process at all, what is going on there, they will be told, do you want money to earn money for new houses, everyone, everyone, do... contracts with the ministry of defense to go to war, it may even come back in the end, how much is it powerful, you see, the thing is that there are some systemic crises, crisis phenomena, that is, they all froze there in the winter, and the central moscow region, which is just there, excuse me, it’s just everywhere, just very, very expensive and a lot, and the fact that

, again, these... dump breakthroughs, again , it looks like a systemic problem, but that does not mean that it will somehow fall, and here i am looking at this big water, and on the one hand it's nice to see it, why, because it's not that i'm happy there, that people with russian there are some problems with citizenship, i am not interested in this, i am interested in the fact that the resources of the russian state will go instead of a conventional war... to some kind of restoration of work, but the problem, in my opinion, is that it can drown there 100 times, but putin will find money for the war, so let's make some assumptions about what would happen if moscow went under the water, well, it would be interesting to see, and yes, what, well, some region is floating, by the way, look, it's quite good houses that is,

russians, they are also different, there is also a wealthy one part, there are a lot of people who do not live in shacks on chicken legs, and they have a lot of cars, not only chinese, but also others, that is, this story is so complicated, and you see, they, as it were, do not like it very much , and they even proclaimed such a word there as vilas, but they... do not draw the conclusion vila in relation to whom, putin is somewhere in space fighting with nato, you understand, and some boyars there, well, they are bad there is something else, well i do not know, maybe the mayor of orsk will be imprisoned there, or he will move to dubai to his son, maybe this is how it will end, that is, we are only interested in the ability of the russian state.