violate international obligations and the european convention on human rights, in particular due to the excessive length of court proceedings and the imperfection of national legislation. no judge in ukraine, i think, as in any other country, wants to participate in the adoption of a decision where the european court found a violation of certain provisions of the convention, just as , as they say, every judge does not want to have some disciplinary . the procedure of course, there are such solutions. the experts stated that ala oliynyk's explanation, in particular, related to career growth her nephew, not very convincing. nevertheless, it is believed that the judge meets the criterion of high moral qualities. oliynyk has passed to the next stage and soon the commission will have to assess her professional competence. another candidate for the post of judge of the constitutional court of ukraine made it to the next stage. serhii riznyk, vice-rector of ivan franko national university of lviv. professor of constitutional law. he

collects executive proceedings, in particular for violations of traffic rules. and the judge, and a candidate for the post of judge of the constitutional court must have great respect for traffic rules. over the past two years, serhiy riznyk has accumulated as many as 18 fines for traffic violations. among them are violations of the speed limit, improper parking, and phone conversations while driving. riznyk himself is proud that he receives an average of two or three fines every year, and only the 22nd was so fruitful. this is the 22nd year of violations and in the 23rd year there are three again, two of which are parking violations. disruption by violations - this is 15 fines per year, a significant amount. the 22nd year turned out to be difficult for all of us, and we, and i, in particular, had a very long work schedule, a significant workload with foreign students. in the conditions of the attacks, in addition, we

made several such serious long trips, well, let's say, to kyiv and a little further, in order to transfer foreign humanitarian aid to our colleagues, we covered 1500 km at a time, the drivers changed, i do not rule out that this i could not allow such violations, serhiy riznyk does not own real estate, instead has a lot of savings, $68,00 in cash as of 2020, wife. small children, i understand that you were the main breadwinner of the family, what are the sources of these funds? as of 20, at the end of the 20th year, at that moment there was this amount of funds, unfortunately, it is already significantly less for this period of time, because the costs were postponed, but i will frankly say that from the point of view, even as we speak to an intelligent outside observer, in 20 years... er

life, with the modest way of life our family led, this is a normal amount. sergey riznyk explains that he was able to save a significant amount during 10 years of marriage, even before children appeared. parents also helped with products from the village. well, our family didn't buy any real estate anywhere, we didn't buy a single car more expensive there than $11,000, and that was once, and the second one cost $6 or $700 there, after... selling the first one, we practically for the entire period time, we once went on a trip abroad with our children, i say again, i am not proud of it, because we have to find time for the family, for such expenses, but we lived economically, our parents helped us with natural products, this is a fairly common practice here in ukraine, a group of experts passed serhiy riznyk to the next stage of the selection, whether a lawyer will become a judge of the constitutional court, we will find out

soon, for today i have everything, if you want to report on corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address, see you in exactly one week.

talk about the latest and most relevant news regarding the temporarily occupied crimean peninsula and as always we wanted to start this block with stay military news and the actions of the armed forces of ukraine on the territory of the temporarily occupied peninsula, and our first guest is mr. volodymyr zablotskyi, a naval expert, mr. volodymyr, i hear you, you hear us, okay, yes, mr. volodymyr, first of all, please tell me, you recently attended a very interesting conference in bulgaria, what kind of conference it was, what is its significance for our defense complex and... for crimea in general, well, i can’t say anything about the conference, it must be some kind of mistake , but i can say in general that any conference aimed at increasing our defense capability accelerates the process

of development of events at the front in our favor, and of course accelerates the liberation of the temporarily occupied crimea. this is the main thesis that i can prove, what i am sure of, well, in fact , the black sea security conference was held in bulgaria, at which we heard a lot of theses and about security in the black sea region, representatives of the countries of the black sea region and countries took part there are strategically important for this region, and you know, i have a question, why... can we generally talk about ensuring security in the waters of the black sea region, as long as the black sea fleet of the russian federation exists and there is a russian regime in the russian federation as it is now on the borders of the black sea region? we definitely

cannot say, and it will be a mistake if someone convinces us otherwise as long as there is a black sea fleet in the black sea. there is danger for all, even those countries that do not take part in hostilities as long as the russian federation exists, there is a danger for countries that are located beyond the borders of even the black sea, this is firstly, secondly, we have such a historical example, very attractive, which i i think it should be applied after our victory, to deprive. the russian federation, if it remains, or the state entity that will exist in its place, the right to have naval forces on the black sea. we still see that russia has greatly

lost its efforts in the black sea and as a result of the actions of the naval forces of ukraine, first of all, the armed forces of ukraine, and they even had to change the commander of the black sea fleet, can you see? uh, that the new commander somehow conducts combat operations in a different way, more effectively than the previous one, and do we oppose this, how do you assess, you know, the situation is developing in such a way that nothing changes from a change of commander, and it's in vain they do, although that's the way it is, that's how we have it. yes, please, the point is that the change of commander in this case is nothing decides and the enemy loses, he has the means, he is waging an unjust war, he has the means for this war out of date, he has weapons systems that were prepared for the last war, that is

, we are ahead in what, what, in terms of know-how in the war at sea, and not even having a fleet. nevertheless, ukraine pushes the enemy out of the water area, at least the south-western water area of ​​the black sea, the result of which is the restoration of sea trade, ukraine's communication with the outside world, and the prerequisites for the liberation of crimea are created. ugh. well, indeed, we are now we see how russia is trying. vat the remnants of the black sea fleet, and as reported by many russian media and propaganda russian media and many other sources, russia is now transferring its black sea fleet ships to the ports of novorossiya, and even they have concluded an agreement with

the occupation authorities of abkhazia. can we say that for us and for the armed forces of ukraine, the ports of novorossiysk and the ports, possible ports of abkhazia are a legitimate target. obviously, a legitimate target, russian warships, military facilities anywhere, even for within the boundaries of the black sea, we know the latest examples. let's say, almost destruction, but heavy damage to a missile ship in the baltic fleet, damage to objects elsewhere, in other regions of russia, that is, far from the theater of hostilities, but if we have such an opportunity, we will destroy the enemy there , where we can, and do we have such an opportunity, mr. volodymyr, or are these goals achievable for us in novorossiya? and well, in the future in abkhazia, quite achievable, this is not

a problem for aerial drones, let's say yes, shock, both for sea and for submarines, what about the tests that were recently reported, moreover, now it is only a matter of political decision, the fact is that after the damage to tankerasih, last year, when the vdc was damaged. the olniygorsk gornyak was damaged just a few hours later by the tanker sikh, which was standing in line for passage through the kerch strait. but our western partners, well , warned us that this should not be done, because it is oil export and so on. after that, ukraine moved to oil strikes infrastructure on the mainland, that is, where there is no threat of an oil spill. and the threat of ecology to the surrounding environment, well , let's see, i think that as the need arises,

we have surface, underwater , air, ground, missile and other means, we can clearly see this on the example of the last strike on dzhanka , ugh, well, you are really in this week as a result of the attack on the military airfield of the temporarily occupied crimea dzhanko and the destruction of the launcher of the anti-missile complexes. air defense, radar system, as well as affected russian aircraft, this has already been confirmed and stated by the representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense of ukraine, andriy yusov, and here you know, the question arises, what new challenges arise for the armed forces of ukraine after the destruction of certain objects at the dzhankoy airfield, that is, who and what can be next, well, for example, the kerch bridge, how do you assess the prospects? damage to the city of kerch, the kerch bridge will be destroyed, there are means for this, er, the only thing is that its

destruction must somehow be coordinated with the fact that our troops are doing on land, that is, its destruction must be part of the plan to liberate crimea, that is, a strike, then logistics are interrupted from the sea from this bridge, then there is an assault on the peninsula or in... knowledge of the enemy, forcing him to leave the peninsula, temporarily occupied and so on another, that is, these are interconnected parts of one chain, which must be coordinated somewhere in time, and it seems that russia understands that the bridge will be destroyed, because it is building a railway road at an alarming pace already across the land to supply ammunition to its occupying forces, and if on... even the bridge is destroyed, then the efforts of russia will not stop, does this

destruction of the kerch bridge have such a great military significance, or is it more about some kind of symbolism, well, symbolism is present in war, because the informational component always exists parallel to the physical destruction of something or someone, here it is difficult to say, but must be done. and the other, moreover, if they build this branch from rostov, there are two such bridges, two sections over the kalmius and over another river, a little further there, which can be destroyed, and it's not yet a fact that this branch will work, ugh, we're talking about the rostov, melitopol, berdyansk branch, the one that russia is currently building the railway, it's one and the same. are not building now at an accelerated pace, as you say, yes, yes, and one more news that we

would like to talk to you about is very important, but it is published by reuters, with reference to four of its interlocutors, and reuters writes about that that ukraine did not begin to conclude an agreement on safe navigation in the black sea, ukraine unexpectedly refused to conclude an agreement with russia and turkey regarding safe shipping. in the black sea, when this agreement was almost reached. well, it is logical that ukraine will not sign any agreement, yes, with the russian federation, and ukraine, as no one else understands and has seen in its experience, that any agreement signed by russia is not worth a penny, and we we saw it in the budapest memorandum, and we saw it during this agreement and the agreement on the joint use of the sea of ​​azov and so on, but still it is possible that there are some alternative

security and cooperation measures that can be proposed, for example, with turkey, which for us is a strategically important state in, well , at least in the water area of ​​the black sea region. you know, we are currently discussing a topic that is not worth discussing, because the existence, in general, i consider it a fake, that ukraine conducted some separate negotiations with russia and turkey, and then left, the presidential administration officially denied such and such a fact. negotiations, therefore , it is easier to conduct them, if sea trade is unblocked in our country without the participation of russia, we will successfully several millions have already brought tens of millions of grain, er, we export, import goods, now they have started container transportation, that is, we do not need it, moreover, here in favor of the fact that this is the ipso of russia,

the fact that they discredit the official kyiv. by the very fact of the negotiations, which he allegedly then renounces, so i do not particularly believe in this personally, and i do not consider it necessary to discuss it, because it is not a fact that such negotiations did not take place, that is, in fact, we do not need them either, ukraine enough controls the region to restore shipping to pre-war levels, and no new grain. agreements or any other agreements with russia are impossible, we do not need them, yes you are right, i found news about the head of the new black sea fleet, british intelligence writes that after his appointment , the black sea fleet of russia shows the least activity since the beginning of the full-scale

invasion, so mr. volodymyr, you were absolutely right that on behalf of the head of the black sea fleet... it means little, he has little influence on anything, the very picture on the field battle is such that he cannot do anything, well , although he hides these ships away from ukrainian drones, and this is also confirmed by british intelligence, which writes that the port of novorossiysk has already been modernized to support ships from the temporarily occupied crimean peninsula, but at the same time russia is now actively trying to mobilize citizens of... countries who live on the territory of the occupied peninsula to join the ranks of the armed forces of the russian federation, and indeed during this time we have seen a lot of cases that russia opened against the crimeans, against the citizens of ukraine on territories of the occupied crimea, who did not want

to join the ranks of the russian federation, this is how you evaluate this news and what should the citizens of ukraine do. who simply do not want to go to olaf of the russian federation, which simply forces them, well, i cannot disagree with the fact that this is happening, that this is a fact, this is another crime of the so-called russian federation, and this crime is again directed against ukraine, against its ethnicity, without regard to that, these are crimean tatars, these are ethnic ukrainians or... even russians, they do this both in crimea and in other occupied territories territories and are thus trying to solve their issues at the expense of other peoples, including the occupied nations, to counteract this, there is such a program that was implemented by the main intelligence department, including to

contact with the representatives of ukraine and there will be , conscripted into the troops of the invaders, how to go out , let's say, detailed instructions, what to do and how to act in order to survive, let's say, stay alive. and return home, well, as i understand it, the conscription of citizens disloyal to russia, citizens disloyal to russia into the russian army, this is actually possibility. for ukrainian intelligence to get their eyes inside the russian army and people who still could not refuse it

from the service, but have some pro-ukrainian views, they can contact ukrainian intelligence and report useful information for ukraine and thus bring the liberation of crimea closer. thank you very much, mr. volodymyr. thank you for joining our broadcast and answering our questions . choksaglos, tefexpress military maritime expert, volodymyr zablotsky was in direct contact with us, and we have a small break, and then we will continue our broadcast. thank you, exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. russia's war against of ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics that

resonate in our society. drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other russian cities. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project. boring, because there is nothing to fight about, let's invent, help to understand the present and predict the future, before the world, the second trump presidency will be terrible. project for those who care and think politclub. every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already come to the snake itself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. kamikaze drone attacks, political analytics, objective and meaningful, there is no political season, exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points

of the front. svobodalai, frankly and impartially, you draw your own conclusions. vasyl zima's big broadcast, two hours of air time, two hours of your time. two hours to learn about the war and how the world lives, two hours to keep up with economic news and sports news, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become likeable to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours , the big broadcast of vasyl zima, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening at espresso. the verdict with serhiy rudenko, now in a new two-hour format, is even more analytical. even more important topics, even more top guests: foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, as well as feedback, you

can express your opinion on the bad day with the help of a phone survey, turn on and tune in, verdict with serhii rudenko, every weekday from 20 to 22 at espresso. we continue the berber program, it is a joint project of the tv channel and the first crimean tatar tv channel of the apr. in the studio gulsum khalilova, my colleague, i'm andriy yanitskyi, and today's second guest is borys babin, ex-representative of the president of ukraine in the autonomous republic of crimea. mr. boris, congratulations. so, the black sea security conference, the international crimean platform, was held in bulgaria, your colleague was there, and i know what you know. details about what was discussed there, what is the significance of this conference for the future liberation of crimea, tell us in more detail, and why bulgaria in your opinion, well, look, this

conference is already the second, it is the black sea security conference, that is why it is held in the black sea countries, last year it was romania, and it was the first conference, the responsible bodies from the ukrainian side are primarily the ministry of defense and the ministry of foreign affairs, so this is a certain specificity of this conference, it is expert in a certain dimension, i.e. experts gathered on the first day, diplomats on the second day, representatives of the states participating in the crimean platform, what can we say? first, it's good that it's being held, it's good that we 're learning to be consistent, because it's an annual conference, it has to happen and provide corresponding extension, my colleague olesya tsibulka also from the association for the reintegration of crimea had the opportunity to report at this conference, what can be said about its significance, first of all. to strengthen the institutional capacity of the crimean platform, especially in the expert dimension, that is why my colleague and i, let's say, remotely, we just presented those improvements that were on...

the previous ones, which were conducted by the resource center, at the future of crimea strategic forums, we have held three of them over the past two years, just the last forum that was held in march, it was dedicated to increasing the institutionalization of the crimean platform, first of all the expert network, because if we have an expert network, it should work, so experts should give what they are called experts, not because i came to the tv studio in a tie, yes , and because i have to give a certain intellectual... product, a certain significant, as they say, cost price, which is then put on the table, put on the table by the participating states, international organizations, in order for a person to write something, it is necessary that first, and someone paid something for it, the second to she was responsible for this and had a certain status, but we have already had the crimean platform for three years and we do not see the answers to these questions, and that is why the relevant internal regulatory documents have just been worked out, you know, this is purely tedious work, at first glance, at first glance bureaucratic, we don't like bureaucracy here, we like slogans,

so that a person speaks... with a beautiful high platform, said something, then she left this platform and what's next, so what's next, we worked, appropriate developments will be provided to the crimean platform itself and the expert network, then the ball is in their court, they want, let them approve, don't want, let them continue to exist as they exist, i mean precisely the expert dimension, and with regard to the interstate dimension, this it is also important, we have to prepare certain interstate agreements, which is no less concerning the office of the crimean platform, it is not institutionalized, it should be fixed, not only at the declaration level. it is good that they approve, but at the level of certain agreements, so that this system will grow into what we call mechanism, what we call certain structural movements, and for it to be precisely a network that unites states, that unites them for constant interaction, it must be an international staff, it must be relevant offices and so on, a full-fledged international supranational structure, then it will work, as far as i understand, the very idea of ​​the crimean platform was born when there was an idea to return crimea

diplomatically. let's draw the world's attention to the crimean issue and somehow spread it, increase it, now already in the measure of a full-scale invasion, when the heat is on war, and when something actually explodes on the territory of crimea every day, and we see. that crimea will still be liberated by the force of ukrainian arms, rather than by diplomatic efforts. what is the role of the crimean platform? is she preparing the adaptation, reintegration of crimea or? well , look, first of all, the fact that it was created is actually very good, because maidanchyk should discuss not only the word crimea, so it is very convenient, you know, to talk about coffee in yalta or borekykh or saraya, it does not give insults, but there is another dimension, there is a dimension of real integration into the occupation, there is a dimension of international violation right, crimea became a precedent and a negative one.

a precedent for an attempt at annexation, so this particular mechanism of the crimean platform was a very successful step. so, if we recall the history of the crimean platform, it was created even before the full-scale invasion, as an instrument of such diplomatic influence on the world, on other countries in order to raise and make the crimea issue more visible, and then it seemed that this was the right way, because there were no other tools, but today we see that during the already heated phase of the war in something explodes in crimea every day and we... understand that crimea will be liberated by the force of ukrainian weapons, here diplomatic efforts are already taking second place, what is the role of the crimean platform now, what is it doing, preparing crimea for deoccupation, reintegration or measurements, the situation that is now in crimea, what is its role? look, well , first of all, really, when it was created, it was a platform for increasing attention to crimea, but not only in the dimension, you know, of such purely pr, it is very convenient to say there, coffee tomorrow

concert in yalta, the day after tomorrow. in yaalti tam or borekikh bakh chisarai, it adds likes, yes, it is normal for politicians, but there is another dimension, there is a dimension of real work, yes, and that is why this step was really timely then, because it was not something diplomatic, like they say table talks, i.e. conversations, it was just putting crimea on the agenda as a precedent, a negative precedent, an attempt at annexation, an encroachment on the entire world legal order, as they say, the rules of the game recognized by civilized nations, and therefore it is, as they say shoot and our enemies find it very painful accepted because they knew what it could lead to. as for how to liberate crimea , you know, this is a mantra about diplomatic ways, i can say, whoever wants to, let him check that i always said a very simple thing: it is impossible to return something that was taken by military means, not by military means, even if we spend the return without imagination.