we start traditionally from the western regions: tomorrow in the west of ukraine, dry, sunny weather will prevail with an air temperature you can't think of better, such a non-synoptic statement is clearly +20 +25°. in the north of ukraine, the weather can easily be confused with the western one, because it is also the 20th, 22nd, 20th, 23rd, and it is also sunny everywhere. warm weather will prevail in the east of ukraine tomorrow. yes, and in kharkiv oblast, luhansk oblast, and donetsk oblast. the air temperature is 20-24° without precipitation, but there will be such a nuance here, a strong wind is expected in the east tomorrow north-eastern direction with storm gusts up to 15-20 m/s. there will be no strong wind in the central part of ukraine, there will be excellent weather, anti-cyclonic nature of the weather, increased atmospheric pressure, air temperature - 20-24°, well, in a word , just some... synoptic paradise, in the southern

part of ukraine, tomorrow i will also start with a nuance here windy, there will also be a strong wind tomorrow and especially on the coast, respectively in the sea part, but in general it will be dry, sunny, warm and the maximum air temperature will be 20-24, 20-25° above zero, dry, sunny weather is expected in kyiv tomorrow with an air temperature of about +22°. well, i would like to say that this weather will last until the end of the week. this week is special, easter, and of course everyone is wondering what the weather will be like, and the first, just imagine, the first rains will appear at the end of the week, on holy saturday and easter itself, but on easter, according to previous forecasts, rains are expected in places in the west, in the north and in the center of ukraine, but for now, enjoy the wonderful, dry, sunny, comfortable weather. thank you very much

didenko for the information about the weather, well, i hasten to say goodbye to you, then the verdict with serhiy rudenko remains zapresso and take care. good evening, we are from ukraine. today in the program verdict with serhiy rudenko: the tendency to aggravation. the russians are trying to seize more ukrainian territory in the east while the armed forces are waiting for american weapons. will it be possible to stabilize? unreasonable blocking.

the chatbots of ukrainian intelligence, security services and the ministry of digitization in telegram did not work for almost half a day. how to organize the work of popular platform? narrowing of rights and freedoms. ukraine has suspended the protection of property rights and free elections under the conventions of the council of europe. are all these restrictions justified during war? glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program, my name is serhii rudenko, i congratulate everyone and wish everyone good health. in the next two hours, we will talk about ukraine, the world, and our victory, today in the program. next , we have a video that we have now prepared for you,

dear viewers, this is how the enemy tank brightly flared up after the impact of the kamikaze drone, the pilots of the air reconnaissance unit shadow. friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live there. please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey, today we ask you the following: do you think it is justified to restrict human rights and freedoms during?

wars, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own opinion, please write in the comments under this video, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if yes, well... 800 211 381 no 0800 211 382 all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. we have our first guest on the phone, this is roman bezsmertny, a diplomat, politician, former ambassador of ukraine to belarus, a people's deputy of several convocations. mr. roman, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. good evening, mr. sergey. well, roman petrovich, let's start with... nato secretary general jens stoltenberg's visit to kyiv, because today unannounced visit of the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, he invited zelensky to the summit of the alliance in washington, but expressed doubt that ukraine would receive

an invitation to join this organization there. let's listen to what stoltenberg said. i really believe... that ukraine has a rightful place in nato, and we will do everything to ensure that ukraine becomes a member of this alliance. in order for this decision to be made, we need all members of the alliance to agree to it, we need a consensus, not a majority, but all 32 members the alliance agreed. i do not expect that we will be able to reach such an agreement at the summit in july, but i think that we ... will be able to demonstrate that we are bringing ukraine closer to membership, and that the day will come as soon as possible when ukraine becomes a full member of our alliance. roman petrovych, i understand that stoltenberg came to

inform zelensky that ukraine does not receive an invitation to the north atlantic alliance. today they talked about what ukraine will receive in the next five years. 100 billion dollars of aid, is it? an adequate answer in the current situation, is this enough, or does ukraine still need to insist on the status of a special partner of nato, various countries outside nato, or rather, a special partnership with the united states, with great britain, or after all, in the current situation, ukrainian diplomacy should do your best efforts so that we receive a positive signal at the anniversary summit in washington. the first and most important thing is that the situation in the world is changing so dynamically and quickly that no general secretary of the toltenberg, neither all 32 leaders

of nato member countries, nor you and i can hardly predict what will happen in this matter tomorrow, because it is still before the 13th. april, no one could even think that part of nato would stand up for israel, when iran attacked israel on the night of april 13-14. especially when in power in the united states of america, the democrats, who, as you know, have always avoided such and such behavior. therefore, first of all, i would recommend that ukrainian diplomacy in this regard... work, next, and also, it is also necessary understand that 32 votes are 32 votes, and we can hardly predict what will happen to one, two, three, and how they

will behave, so it is obvious that in this situation there is a second track, which must be worked out no less carefully, this is as much help as possible to ukraine. during the russian-ukrainian aggression so that ukraine could and was able to defend itself thanks to this help. the third track that needs to be worked out is bilateral agreements. this topic actually does not give the opportunity to press too hard on the first track persistently, because i think that everyone has noticed that both in the american and in the european... in the mass media there has been a general tendency that everything will be done a-a in the relations between ukraine and the nato countries, the way it is was done, if ukraine was a member of nato, it is only necessary to switch to

a bilateral system of relations with nato member countries in order to implement the entire program, and actually this thesis about 100 billion, which is called... pay attention to how: nato can create , because in fact the answer to this question is in national governments, which have already formed packages for... aid to ukraine, are signing the so-called guarantees, plus or minus, but these texts, they are similar, and their essence is that, in essence, if ukraine were to switch to bilateral relations with nato members, at the same time, it should be borne in mind that the current visit, it not only began to shape the responses and behavior of the participants at the washington summit, the draft nato summit. and the fact is that after the decision of congress and

its signing by joseph biden regarding aid to ukraine, nato, as the operator of this aid, must now discuss a number of technical issues, because of course this resource is available, part of this resource will go to the united states of america, and part will be paid for and supplied from european countries, and a number of... information that is now one way or another emanates from the national governments, says that nato actually plays a key role in this mechanism, therefore the third track, this bilateral relations, which would compensate for the mechanisms themselves, ukraine needs to work out with these states, and the fourth thing, which must be worked out, this is precisely the potential of nato, which until now has only been... mentally voiced, this is actually personnel assistance, and the following is

the formation of principles, in the perspective of possible combat-capable joint units, which would seem to reflect nato, but in reality they would be formed from national armies, nato states, so in this case, if the choice is like this, and the dilemma is posed like this, then i would... offer the ukrainian political leadership to go along the second, third and fourth track, because it are the steps which solve problems and do not give an opportunity to aggravate relations with nato members, i am not talking there with washington and berlin, because this couple and the connection of coordination of actions in matters of behavior at the washington nato summit are clearly traced here, especially, mr. serhiy, he anniversary and it is clear that well... you know that everyone remains human, and you don't need to bend the stick here, because you can

hit yourself in the face, so if there is something to work on, you must continue to work correctly and diplomatically and membership in nato and the possibility of an invitation, because we understand very well that an invitation is not an introduction. roman petrovych, but considering that the united states of america also voted to allocate a large... aid to ukraine in the amount of 61 billion dollars, and great britain last week announced 500 million pounds of aid, does this mean that washington, too, and london and our other partners give a clear signal to the whole world that further this aid will continue to flow to ukraine, which means that ukraine is alone no... will remain with russia, and obviously, this is a signal, first of all to putin, who hoped that

in the congress and in the senate, this decision will be blocked, will not be adopted, or will be postponed, well, at least until the presidential elections, so what, how, how this decision changes not only the situation in ukraine, but also the world's attitude to what is happening on the eastern and southern fronts in ukraine, it is obvious that this is not... just a step, let's say, important, it is a step in a system of similar steps, because no, in parallel with the fact that a number of national governments have made decisions about aid, decisions were made in parallel to increase and accelerate the production of weapons, armaments, armored vehicles, ammunition, and so on, it is clear that the principle of operation in the civilized world, they never met. weapons, i.e. weapons that are currently planned both in increasing production and in

their modernization, will be supplied to ukraine, as aid within the framework of aid and so on. please note that i did not accidentally touch on this fourth track and the issue of assistance by personnel, troops and the formation of a joint shock fist and a joint command, because i have said more than once, it is a matter of time. because the point is that it is necessary to understand that in all national governments there is a public resonance, a public relationship, without such a mechanism there will not be... these societies the importance of what the national government does, they will not understand the threat that russia poses to their state , that is why this is a step, not so much a step from the point of view of helping ukraine today, as a step that will allow these governments to do the necessary work in the interests of nato, and in the interests of europe, and in

the interests of the whole world, so that, in including resolving this issue by striking a blow against ... russian russia, defeating it on the battlefield in ukraine, this radically changes approaches, and from my point of view, this rationalism, which was manifested today in the tone of both speeches, he changes that rhetoric, which remained until today from vilnius, because it was felt that in the relations between brussels and kyiv, and brussels, washington, and brussels, and even berlin, that tone... did damage, to put it mildly , did damage, so the current tonality, it is absolutely correct, and in fact, it gives an opportunity to move in absolutely all directions, while solving the key problem, which is providing maximum assistance to ukraine in absolutely all directions of this assistance. roman petrovich, even last

week there were several statements, or rather, several events, which indicate that... russia is starting an arms race, and in the style of the soviet union, because boris pistorius, the minister of defense of germany, said in an interview with the tv channel ard, said russia already produces more weapons than it needs to carry war against ukraine and a warning against putin's further military ambitions. let's hear what pistorius said. russia's military economy was streamlined, and now most of the weapons produced no longer go to the front, but end up in warehouses. you can be naive and say that he is doing it out of caution, as a skeptic, i would rather say in this case that he is doing it because he is planning something, or already has something in mind. at the same time,

the un security council has not voted a resolution on... non-proliferation of nuclear weapons in space, and the country that made this decision was russia, china abstained, and this is also very reminiscent of the soviet union and the confrontation between the soviet union and the united states of america at the time, does putin have this potential for this arms race and will the end of this arms race for putin be like this same as the final was the soviet union. well, the fact is that no matter how hard they are now in russia, they do not have the opportunity to gain the momentum that the soviet union had, from the point of view of all parameters absolutely, from this it must be understood, that it is rather a matter of tactical tools, which is connected with the interaction

of the russian federation with iran and china, because we see how they... ran in the state department of the united states of america, although we were assured for almost a year that the supply of china, dual technologies, fragments weapons, weapons components are not happening, in fact, if you pay attention to the dialogue that took place between anthony blinken, the secretary of state, and sydzenpin, the head of kener, it is clearly seen everywhere that it was actually about the fact that china does not... only supplies , and finances the military-industrial complex of the russian federation, this is firstly, secondly, pay attention, there the second issue was again the topic of iran's near east, which expands aggression, increases the potential of producing military products, the fact is that in those, in this in the triangle

, a system of natural accounting for the exchange and supply of weapons and armaments of military technologies has been in place for a long time. and yes, what we see, if we look at the contracts between china and russia, russia and iran, then in the main, the main volume is weapons, or military equipment, or armored vehicles, i'm not talking about the fact that , pay attention, russia's contracts with india are actually blocked, russia's contracts with brazil are blocked for the supply of weapons, equipment, ammunition and so on, that is, us... in fact, it is about what is happening there a certain naturalization in this in this triangle, so they will all build up weapons, and this applies not only to conventional ... weapons, in china a decision was made to achieve parity from the point of view of nuclear weapons, and there is a gap of almost 2.5 thousand units of nuclear warheads ,

then you need to understand what parity is. obviously, they calculate this parity based on the total number of three warheads and so on. from here it is obvious that the phenomenon that pistorius is talking about is present, but if you look at the technological level. this, then he will clearly lose to the united states of america and allies, including nato countries. the only thing that attracts attention is that, including in the conversation in beijing, there was a very emotional and vivid appeal by the american side to the fact that china is spreading the highest technologies, destroying the security of the european union, the eurasian continent. including, in fact, this hints at the fact that those technologies that reach china through american developers and manufacturers in the form of transnational corporations, they then

migrate to russia, and this is actually the reason that allows russia to periodically parasitize the world technology market and produce modern weapons, if this channel can be closed. and from what happened with the exchange of opinions between blinken, sydzenpinny and blinken and the conversations were very sharp, the working the commission at the level of the military leadership and the ministry of trade and finance continues its work, well, to say that the chinese will go about it with an open mind is to fool themselves, but that they will have to take some steps, including limiting funding. defeating russia's military-industrial complex and at least suspending the export there of technologies and certain components above the modern one,

which are being developed by the united states of america. it is obvious to roman petrovych that blinken's visit to beijing, and the whole thing in general the communication that is now taking place between the united states of america and china, one way or another, despite all their internal... well, let's say, commercial issues and political issues, they are still somehow directed at the global peace summit that will be held in switzerland in the month of june, and we know that xijin pin is flying to france in may, there will be the anniversary date of 60 years of diplomatic relations between france and beijing, in china, it is meant, and it is clear that everyone is trying. in some way to conduct a dialogue with china and convince everyone to be friends with putin militarily, it is not very convenient for

him and for his economy, or let's say, it can even have negative consequences. zelenskyi says that the world community, which will gather at the global peace summit in switzerland, should force the russian federation to make peace, and this path can begin precisely here. summit, let's listen to what zelensky said. we continue to prepare the first inaugural peace summit for june, and our team is now working together with the teams of key partners to make the summit truly global, we can say for sure that everyone continents will be represented. the world majority must force russia to make peace and can do it. it is in june that the path to a just peace can begin. roman petrovych, the president of ukraine has a lot of hopes for the peace summit, but it is obvious that in the current

situation we are talking about discussing some concept of future peace, not even discussing only zelenskyi's peace formula, because the issue is much broader than zelenskyi's formula. what is the result of this? summit ukraine can get, which it can have the consequences of this summit for the russian-ukrainian war and will it have such consequences in some short-term perspective, because it is obviously about strategy, about next year or about the 26th? well, from my point of view, i would not expect any kind of overtures here, the maximum that would be rational from my point of view is to come to... an agreed text that would speak about the position of the majority of the world's states from the point of view of, let's say,

exit to solve the problem. and this applies to why i phrased it that way, because in fact, if we talk about the global summit of peace, then in the conditions when the russian-ukrainian, iranian-israeli war is going on today, to package it only with the problem of, let's say, victory over racism, well, it clearly does not correspond to the scope and content of the document and the scope of this form, because when it .. there is a global peace forum, that is, well, according to me, it should have been about the new order in the world, new institutions, new order and so on. if it is possible to reach in this dialogue, let's say, a text that concerns the position of the world, the dominant number of countries in relation to the russian-ukrainian war, i will be very happy about that, and

god willing, it will be possible to come out... and on a certain tracing paper, a certain scheme of the post-war arrangement of the world, that is, what we call the new world order, the order, well, it will generally be a shot in the ten, or at least in the speeches it will sound that this is one of the samins, i really, by the way, liked the phrase of the president just now, i somehow missed it, that it is the inaugural one, that is, it is the first, but if yes... this work will be carried out and in the end it will be possible to arrive at some kind of configuration of the world order, and this will become a global peace summit will turn into a kind of forum that will be constantly active, and why not, because any such things are big, they began with small, with small meetings, with small agreements, treaties and so on, but here i am mr. serhiy, very...

the inconsistency between the scale of the form and the content of what is being discussed is disturbing, well, i understand how it is treated in diplomatic circles, because such a forum is not a duel of sabers or swordsmen and so on, this is work with a certain document, and from here it is clear that china will start to turn its nose in this regard, well, they will turn their noses behind china... and a lot of countries of the so -called global south, so i would not expect any breakthrough, breakthrough solution there, but what concerns the text , which would make it possible to determine the position of the world once again, which is already clear, and here it is also very important that this position be directed against russia, so that the world tells russia that you are a fuhrer, such a scoundrel, you spoil people's lives. both in

ukraine and around the world, so we will do everything, to put you in a cage and drive you around the world like pugachev, to show what an idiot you are. roman petrovych, another rather relevant topic, and it is probably a topic that will in one way or another affect our path to the european union and, in general, communication with our western partners, is ukraine's position regarding consular issues for... conscripts , who are abroad, for men from 16 to 60 years old, the decision to stop providing consular services to them, a big debate within the state, fair, unfair, abroad, of course, most of those who found themselves without documents or, let's say, wanted to reformulate documents or make some notarial contracts or agreements, cannot do it either, if... moving away

from the question of fair, unfair, convenient, inconvenient, right or wrong, if we talk about the letter of the law and the observance of this law and for stability, the most important law of our constitution, is this decision correct? mr. sergey, the fact is that what is constitutional and legal is also just, and as for... this letter, signed by the first deputy minister of foreign affairs, then from all points of view this letter does not comply with the norms of international law, and the general declaration of human rights, and the european declaration of human rights, further , it violates article 25 of the constitution of ukraine, it violates a whole set of legislation that regulates it.