disappeared into the network of the main security department of the kgb and received personal file data on more than 8,600 employees of the organization and 40,000 denunciations from poland, lithuania, berlin, ukraine and other countries. the corresponding information was published in the telegram channel of cyber ​​​​partisans. the list of admins and the site database were published there. if you suddenly did not notice, together with the database of the kgb website, we also put on the network the denunciations that were sent to the check officers through the portal. from september 2014 to august 2023. during the occupation of kyiv region, when the world saw the atrocities of the occupiers in buch and other cities of the region, ukrainians also monitored and anonymously sent information to hackers. cyber-partisans received one such message from a ukrainian citizen on march 12, where the woman denounced an opposition blogger in belarus who participated in anti-government protests after the presidential elections. in the message of the hackers on april 26. it is said that thanks to their

activities, the official website of the belarusian kgb has not been working for more than two months, and they also noted that they penetrated the kgb system back in the fall of 2023 and downloaded all the available information, - the belarusian service of radio liberty reports. as the coordinator of the group yuliana shemytovets told the associated press from new york, the attack on the kgb was a response to the statement of the head of the department, ivan tertel, who publicly accused the group of preparing attacks on the most important object. infrastructure of the country, including the nuclear power plant, - writes ape news. the kgb is carrying out the biggest political repressions in the country's history and must answer for it, metovets said. we work to save the lives of belarusians, not destroy them, as repressive belarusian special services do. in addition, cyber-guerrillas have launched a chatbot in telegram, thanks to which belarusians will be able to identify kgb employees by downloading theirs.

photographs. we want to show that in the digital world it is impossible to hide information, and the truth about political repression will emerge, and those who carried it out will be punished. cyber ​​guerrillas also said that they had previously hacked into the computers of the country's largest fertilizer plant in order to force the government to release political prisoners. and for in the past four years, belarusian hackers have carried out several large-scale attacks on belarusian state media, and in 2022 they hacked the belarusian railway three times. seizing control of traffic lights and the control system and paralyzing the transit of russian military equipment to ukraine through belarus, writes ape news. we tell the belarusian authorities that if they do not stop political repression, it will be even worse, shemytovets said. we will continue our attacks to inflict maximum damage on the lukashenko regime. the very fact of publication. polite

the dossier of the belarusian state security committee is actually not as interesting as the information about the belarusian citizens, as well as the ukrainian citizens who wrote these same denunciations. as it turned out at one time , millions of denunciations were found in the archives of the state security committee of the soviet union, which eventually resulted in hundreds of thousands of sentences for russian citizens. moreover, as we know from history, these denunciations were most often written by colleagues to colleagues, neighbors to neighbors, and relatives to relatives. so we talked to the manager about what really happened people's anti-crisis administration, former minister of culture of belarus pavlo latushko. detection of some agents and spies, that's definitely how we understand it. a recent example, the prime minister of poland announced a significant activation. activities of the belarusian and

russian special services on the territory of poland from the point of view of personal threats, then they are pouring out of a bucket. during this time, i had more than a hundred threats to kill, cause physical harm and other consequences. you can even display categories here. these very statements of lukashenko and propagandists, the use of telegram channels by law enforcement officers are direct threats during meetings and sending e-mail comments. as for why this is happening, on the one hand, we understand that there are people who are crazy, as usual, and there are purposeful actions of the special services in order to demotivate us, there is pressure on relatives, but lately, in the last week, we have had in several cases , pressure was exerted on activists through their family members in belarus, they came directly to us in order to blackmail us, this is what voiced don't forget that you have

relatives there, it's actually such stalinism, i don't know, i think even north korea has already given up on persecuting political relatives. and lukashenko is following the path of stalinism, the realism of these threats may still exist, because lukashenko has already gone to liquidate political opponents, we know viktor gonchar, yuriy zakharenko, the former head of the cec, and the minister of foreign affairs, and so on. another high-profile scandal related to the state security committee of belarus was the statement of its head, general ivan tertel, in which he is at... to the specific address of a medical facility in kyiv on bogatyrska street, where, according to him, wounded militants were allegedly being slaughtered. the fact that this medical institution has nothing to do with the armed forces and only minor children of the head

of the belarusian kgb were staying on its territory did not deter pantilik in any way. the criminal regime of the dictator alexander lukashenko was from the first days of a full-scale invasion. an accomplice of another criminal regime in the kremlin and therefore bears absolutely joint responsibility for all war crimes were committed, but the current situation looks wild, even for the regime of oleksandr lukashenko, because naming the specific address of a specific medical institution on the territory of the ukrainian capital essentially meant blackmailing the medical staff and hundreds of minor patients, so it is not surprising that the city authorities of kyiv decided to immediately evacuate all patients and medical workers from its territory. i, taras berzovets, conducted this program for you. thank you for

watching, glory to ukraine and together to victory. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already come to the snake itself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live kamikaze drone attacks. political analytics, objectively and meaningfully. there is no political season. exclusive interviews, reporter. you draw your own conclusions. events: events happening right now that affect our lives. of course, the news

feed reports on them, but few know what is happening. it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events. analyze them, modeling ours future, every saturday at 1:10 p.m., with a repeat on sunday at 10:10 a.m. studio zahid with anton borkovsky at espresso. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the tv channel, the west studio program. we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular , we will talk about the strengthening of american support. and about the situation in the russian federation, which is most likely preparing for a so- called existential war. our guests today are matthew bryza and oleksandr morozov. matthew bryza, former adviser to the secretary of state, will now be on the air of the espresso tv channel of the united states, former director of

european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. well, the key story: the united states gave the go-ahead. congress, the senate, and president joseph biden signed a very important package, it's about money and finances, but etechems will also supply, we understand that etechems is more likely, they were a certain red line, i don't know in what way there was communication, but as far as we understand, the kremlin tried by all means to prohibit the transfer of long-range missile systems to us, and here in washington... a historic decision was made. yes, of course, this is a historic decision, and you and i have been waiting for it for more than one month. you may recall that back in october of last year, when speaker johnson first became speaker, i expressed concern that he had consistently voted against military aid to ukraine. however, it

so happened that the weight of his responsibility helped him to look at the need to help ukraine in a different way. under considerable pressure president biden, as well as under the influenced by president zelensky and evangelicals, particularly baptists from ukraine, speaker johnson eventually found a way to navigate the complexities of the us political system and negotiate a deal. his success demonstrates remarkable skill and strategic foresight. it is good to see that the united states congress is now following the strategic interest of supporting ukraine. as for the c attacks, we learned last week that the united states had already provided them, albeit separately from the latest aid package, and on at the request of the government of ukraine, they did it secretly. obviously, this is a very important step, as it will force russia to withdraw its supply depots. further from the front line, it will also allow ukrainian troops to hit the command centers of russian troops, and

also, presumably, the crimean bridgehead. this is undoubtedly another violation of russia's red lines, but given the many red lines that have already been crossed, the gradual approach of the biden administration appears to deter russia from further escalation. now the focus of attention shifts to whether he can ukraine to mobilize. enough soldiers on the battlefield and to stop russia from breaking through, despite the lack of ammunition in ukraine for the past six months. yes, we are extremely grateful to the united states for all that it does for us. on the other hand, we are also aware that, rather, russia is preparing for another increase in the level of escalation. they fired a ballistic iskander with a cluster munition at odessa, that is, russia... that they are ready to raise and raise the level of escalation and the commission of barbaric crimes against

the civilian population, and accordingly we would like to hear that washington understands, so it may be necessary to strengthen ukraine even more when we are talking, in particular, about very specific one or another systems, both missile and anti-cancer, about the anti-aircraft system defense, we lack the patriot systems to... shut down our peaceful cities. yes, i mean, supplying more batteries to the patriots is something that is being discussed now, and of course the biden administration understands how barbaric how you rightly described, there are these attacks on the civilian population as well as on the energy infrastructure. the whole world sees this, and every time russia does this, it loses more and more credibility on the international stage, so i think that additional patriot systems, as well as f-16s, will be delivered to ukraine soon, making it difficult

to use russian-controlled aerial bombs, which have such a devastating effect on the civilian population in ukraine. and we have to think about the situation that existed about a year ago, when before the united states provided hymars, russia was free to shell eastern ukrainian cities with artillery because ukrainian artillery did not have enough range to respond effectively. to shelling, but now things have changed and not only because of hymers, but also because of the attacks, although russia continues to seek escalation, it can now only achieve this by shelling the civilian population. as i already mentioned, the ukrainian military was without significant additional assistance from the us for about six months. russia managed to advance only a few kilometers behind bakhmut, that is, her successes were not significant. ukraine successfully resisted this. advancement and given the inevitable strengthening of its capabilities, russia's attempts to escalate

the conflict by harming the civilian population are unlikely to succeed on the battlefield . dear mr. ambassador brysen, i would like to ask you about the prospects for the formation of a new agenda, in particular the swiss peace summit. most likely, the russians and their allies will not be represented there in switzerland at the peace summit, the question is whether china will be there. as observers, how do you think the agenda of what will happen in switzerland will differ now, and in general, if we are talking about the prospects of the european union, how seriously will the europeans be prepared to defend their independence and their sovereignty in the event of a threat, yes, because the russians extremely powerfully threaten both the baltic countries and central europe. first, based on mediation experience. in conflicts in eastern europe, such as abkhazia, ossetia and nagorno-karabakh, i

have noticed that the swiss are constantly seeking play a role in such situations, they perceive themselves as highly effective mediators, which often turns out not to be true. therefore, i do not think that there are grounds for concern about the fact that the swiss are convening european and american officials. this does not necessarily mean a softening of europe's position regarding russia's invasion of ukraine. i believe that key european leaders such as emmanuel macron, olaf scholz and others such as george maloney are fully committed to supporting ukraine in its fight against russia. assessing the level. help that provided to ukraine, it is worth noting that great britain and germany are in second and third place, respectively, their commitments remain steadfast. among the european leadership, there is a common understanding of the potential threat to the baltic states from russia if nato's deterrent forces are considered weak, as we have already

discussed. president macron stated that it is possible that european or french soldiers could fight on the territory of ukraine, so it was wrapped in very powerful diplomatic papers, but, but, but, no one says, well, we understand that there is a certain perspective, and we may have to help us on land as well. macron has gone through a pretty amazing transformation. he tried to be the only european interlocutor who could dissuade putin from invading. i will never forget the longest table in the world when... putin was so afraid that macron would infect him with covid in the kremlin, and now, as we all see, macron has become one of the most ardent supporters of confrontation with russia. however, looking at macron's statement to which you refer, i would not take it as saying that france is ready to send their troops to ukraine. i do not see such a readiness on the part of any of the

nato member countries. rather, i take it as a recognition of such a possibility under certain circumstances. in particular, if... russia will continue its current behavior. as you and i have already said, mr. borkovskii, a scenario is possible when coalitions of nato member countries will act outside of nato, but exercising its sovereign prerogatives, it can intervene at the request of ukraine, if russia pushes it to do so. in this context, macron's statement looks like a confirmation of the possibility of such actions and vice versa, a categorical refusal to deploy any forces of the member countries. nato in ukraine will weaken the deterrent signal that ukraine's western allies are trying to convey to russia. the visit of united states secretary of state anthony blinken to the people's republic of china is extremely important. we don't know all the details of what blinken discussed with xi jinping, well, but there are certain, certain parts of strong public signals, and

anthony blinkin de facto warned xi jinping that you can't pretend that china isn't helps russia, because he de facto provides it with everything necessary for waging war against ukraine, well, except for weapons and personnel, this is how they help the russians, and blinkin warned the chinese, asked them not to do this. yes, in response , xi jinping began to talk about the fact that he believes that the united states and china, they, all major powers should be responsible and respect the territorial integrity, sovereignty of other states, and so on and so forth. what did xijin ping really mean and how far would the united states be willing to go states in order to discourage the chinese people's republic from supporting russia. but china did not give everything to russia at once, right? in his peace plan, especially in the first point regarding ukraine, the main emphasis on preserving territorial

integrity reflects china's own interests in taiwan. so the invasion of russia into ukraine put the chinese. difficult diplomatic situation. china with russia, or xi jinping with putin, want to work together to undermine the so-called rules-based international order, established and maintained by the united states. but xinjin pin does not want to indulge in undermining the territorial integrity of ukraine in any way. by the way, in order to maneuver in this difficult situation, china was careful to avoid open violation of g7 sanctions. minister blinkin was forced to go public. to warn china against providing russia with any military assistance it may need. unlike iran and north korea, china has not become an open supplier of ballistic missiles or drones. i do not have seen reports that china supplies a lot of munitions, as does north korea. so china is walking a diplomatic tightrope, and blinkin shares this opinion. his

visit to beijing is aimed at continuing efforts to reduce previously high tensions. in us-china relations. this strategy is consistent with a series of visits by us ministers or government officials to china even before blinkin and sinzimpian met near san francisco last november. the current us approach has to aims to ease pressure on china. at the same time, making it clear that excessive support for russia can cause diplomatic consequences and possibly other sanctions. dear mr. ambassador bryza, well, i would ask you to respond accordingly to what is currently happening in russia, taking into account the very different signals coming from the kremlin, but what they are creating now on the battlefield, we understand, is evidence of their readiness to continue the war, regardless of certain signals, that is, we have no illusions, but there may be a number of factors that could demonstrate

that the kremlin is hesitating, or the kremlin would not be ready to enter into a very long war, but at the moment we see that the kremlin is showing its readiness to fight for ukrainian lands, yes, sparing neither its soldiers nor its resources, and putin feels that he cannot stop for... or it could be the end of him, even physically. however, as already mentioned, the russian offensive lacks success. in fact, their progress is minimal, although they are advancing, but at a very slow pace. it took them almost a year to advance only 16 km beyond bahmud. their inability to launch a successful offensive without additional mobilization poses a significant problem. during the last mobilization of hundreds of thousands of men... an enema of russia, which indicates putin's internal problems. currently, his powers are essentially in a state of stagnation, despite some progress. it remains

to be hoped that the ukrainian forces will persistently resist the current offensive with the arrival of additional military aid, the dynamics will change, which will give ukraine a certain rest before the next thrust. but think about it, even if putin can mobilize, let's say 100,000 soldiers for an offensive, where they have to recruit competent... commanders, there is a specific lack of them, because so many have been killed and wounded, so even if more people are recruited into the army, more commanders will be needed , that is, if you are on the russian side, they need to produce a lot more artillery shells and ammunition, as far as i understand, they are currently only producing half of the 155mm and 122mm artillery shells that they need them to go on the offensive, so they're now producing five times... more artillery shells than ukraine, but you see, a major escalation would require a much larger production volume, so i think over the next year we'll see that russia can't

achieve significant territorial gains, and the ukrainian military will become stronger, and then, perhaps, 2025 will be the year of the ukrainian offensive. ultimately, if ukraine succeeds in attacking the crimean bridge and cutting off russia's communications with crimea, it will completely change putin's approach. in particular his commitment to continuous attacks on the civilian population and war crimes against the ukrainian population. mr. ambassador, how should we deal with the publication in the american press, which stated that some american officials recommended our official kyiv not to strike. on russian oil refining facilities. i believe that the recent request or warning of the white house to ukraine not to strike deep into

russian territory, in particular on oil refineries, was ill-conceived and unreasonable. that's pretty selfish an arrogant and strategically unreasonable step. of course, i understand that president biden really wants to win the election in the fall. i think that for all of us, for all friends of ukraine. it will be better if he wins. however, as far as i'm concerned, the importance of disrupting russian fuel supplies far outweighs any potential slight increase in the price of petroleum products, i.e. gasoline, in the united states before the november election. there are many factors that affect the prices of oil and petroleum products such as gasoline. and the removal of relatively small supplies of russian refined oil, gasoline or diesel fuel from world markets, is unlikely to have a significant impact. impact on us elections. from a strategic perspective, it appears that president biden's political team may have acted hastily, succumbing to panic.

there may have been internal debates, arguments that boiled down to you, who advocated allowing ukraine to hit russian refineries, warned of potential job losses and no second term for president biden, that will lead to less support for ukraine if oil prices rise too much, although there is some truth in these fears. any significant rise in oil prices will be a global phenomenon, not just the result of losses at russian refineries. accordingly, i cannot avoid the topic of the washington summit, so we understand that a historic summit will take place, a summit during the russian aggression against ukraine, and we would hope that at this summit our status and prospects will be finally defined, perhaps as soon as possible . introduction to of the euro-atlantic community, we understand that sweden and finland managed to join nato in record time. we understand, at the same time, what kind of responsibility this

could... entail for the rest of the euro-atlantic community, because during the war, well, at the same time, the fifth article of the euro-atlantic union would have to be applied. as i understand it, nato intends to use the 75th anniversary summit in washington to emphasize its status as the most successful military-political alliance in history, thanks to which it managed to prevent major conflicts between its member countries and russia and the soviet union. in addition, it is expected that the summit will emphasize the need to provide ukraine with greater political and military assistance, and therefore readiness for such support. however, in terms of membership, since ukraine is not a nato member, support from the alliance is limited. there were no signs of plans to accelerate ukraine's accession to nato, and such discussions are unlikely to take place during the summit. as for sweden and finland, it is important

to recognize their long-standing readiness. to membership in nato. both countries have been diligently developing their military potential for ten years. finland boasts one of the most experienced armies in europe, with a significant presence of artillery units along the russian border and a powerful air force equipped with american ff-17 fighter jets. similarly, sweden has a very capable military and over the past decade and a half has essentially committed itself to providing military assistance to nato members in accordance with'. although she herself was not yet a member of the alliance. they were also ready in a military sense to join the nato, and to participate in the alliance's defense efforts. however, the situation in ukraine is significantly different. in the context of the ongoing conflict, ukraine needs support from the nato community to protect its sovereignty and restore territorial integrity. it is unlikely that the alliance will speed up the process of ukraine's accession to nato in the conditions of the current war. however

, at... the 75th nato summit, nato must unequivocally confirm that ukraine's membership in the alliance remains an unwavering commitment, and that the alliance is ready to assist ukraine in this, but after ukraine wins this war. it is also important that nato does not play along with putin's false narrative that it is nato that caused the war in ukraine, when in reality we all know that it was a war of choice or a war of aggression launched by putin and aimed at subjugating ukraine. i would like to ask you about the correct strategy on the part of official kyiv in relations with the administration of president joseph biden and the possible, possible administration of donald trump. we understand that the key story is to preserve our to protect our interests, national ukrainian interests, but on the other hand, we are grateful to the biden administration and understand that donald trump and his team can have serious effects in any case, and

it can happen in america in six months. it is not known what otak delicately formulates, at the same time, but we understand that tucker carlson does one strange interview after another, in particular with people who belong to russian culture and russian influence, but a couple of days ago tucker carlson recorded an interview with the fascist dugin . ukraine is acting absolutely correctly, its strategy regarding of the biden administration, which will be the strategy for the trump administration, is to continue to emphasize how morally. and the strategic need for the united states to continue helping ukraine. it is difficult to imagine a us president who would support ukraine more than joe biden. as we remember, he was the responsible person in the obama administration for the ukrainian policy of the usa after the russian invasion of ukraine in 2014. and having the honor of working directly with him, i saw him with my own eyes the unwavering commitment of the nato family and the containment of russian aggression in the region. if trump.

will be cleared, although he generally shows less support for ukraine, and he was impeached precisely because of the way he treated president zelensky, i mean the first impeachment of president trump. however, despite this, it was not barack obama who provided military aid to ukraine after the previous russian invasion. it was donald trump who first authorized the transfer of javelin anti-tank missiles to ukraine. moreover, when the speaker johnson announced his intention to vote on the aid package for ukraine,... trump did not object to it and even expressed positive emotions towards speaker johnson after the successful approval of the aid package. i think that even donald trump, as predictable and problematic as he is, because of his relationship with russia, will understand that the united states needs to continue to support ukraine as much as possible. as for tucker carlson, he is completely discredited in the united states. his interview with vladimir putin

humiliated him. even now, he is considered maria.