some kind of cooling, as you can see from the degrees, but nevertheless it will become lower by several degrees, in the north of ukraine tomorrow the air temperature is also expected to drop from 18-19° to 21, i.e. today's 26-27 will not be and there will also be no rain and thunderstorms, i apologize, in the east, in kharkiv oblast, luhansk oblast, donetsk oblast, tomorrow will still be just like summer weather, mean temperature of 23-26°, rains and thunderstorms will reach there already in the evening, precipitation is unlikely in donetsk oblast. in the central part of ukraine tomorrow, well, since it is enough large-scale, well, as you can see, in vinnytsia, for example, it will be 19, i.e. colder, but in dnipropetrovsk region, it will still be almost like summer weather, and tomorrow there will also be short-term rains and thunderstorms. in the southern part of ukraine, thunderstorms, thunderstorms, rains in places. will be held in

odesa and mykolaiv regions, in the rest of the territory, i.e. in crimea, in zaporozhye, in kherson region, it will be sunny without precipitation, and the temperature will be very comfortable, 20-23°. in kyiv, tomorrow short-term rain, thunderstorm, be careful, don't be scared, please park your cars carefully cars, and the air temperature is about +19°, that is, it will also be colder tomorrow in the capital, as everywhere in the west and in the north of ukraine, and more. i want to tell you about an important piece of information: on the night of may 8, 9 and 10 , riots are likely in many regions of ukraine. here is the nearest synoptic situation, carefully, of course, follow the development of synoptic events on the espresso channel. well, thank you very much natalsyadenko for the information about the weather. thank you for being with us, stay with the channel.

literally in a few moments the program the verdict is on our tv channel, so i wish you a good evening, see you and take care! good evening, we are from ukraine! watch verdict with serhii rudenko in the program. a successful mission in the bay is narrow. a naval drone of a special unit of the ministry of defense destroyed a russian speed boat near the coast of crimea. experts say that the successful strike could have been a combined one. european-chinese dialogue on ukraine. xi jinping flew to france to talk about trade and the so-called ukrainian crisis. will macron succeed and fonderlyaeen convince him, restrain? investigative

actions of chekists from lubyanka the kremlin added a number of current and former officials to the list of wanted presidents of ukraine. why is putin burning bridges to the negotiations he supposedly dreamed of. glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program, my name is serhiy rudenko, i congratulate everyone and wish everyone good health. for the next hour, we talk about ukraine, the world, the war, and our victory. zelensky is wanted, xi has flown to france, and putin is threatening great britain and france. we will talk about this and other things to talk with the guests of today's studio, today we will have people's deputy of ukraine dmytro razumkov and people's deputy maria ionova as guests. before

starting our big conversation, i suggest you watch a video of how a unit of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense of ukraine destroyed a speed boat of the russian invaders with a magura v5 attack marine drone. according to defense express experts, the nature of the splashes around the drone indicates that air defense could be working on it on some air targets, i.e. a strike is likely was combined. let's see how it all turned out.

friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms. please subscribe to our pages. on these resources and take part in our survey, today we ask you the following: are peace negotiations with russia possible? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own opinion, separate, please write in the comments under this video, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote for the numbers if you

think peace talks with russia are possible, 0800 2011 381, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we are like here are the results of this vote. i want to introduce our guest today, this is dmytro razumkov, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine in 2019-21, dmytro oleksandrovych, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, good evening, thank you for invitation. well, since we are asking our tv viewers whether it is possible for ukraine to negotiate peace with russia, let me ask you what you think about it? well, actually, it's a very difficult conversation because we understand each other. we understand that russia does not understand the negotiation process well, but based on what we see today, including statements from the office, statements from international partners, including statements related to the upcoming conference in switzerland, the so-called

peace formula, about which zelenskyi talks, this indicates that one way or another the negotiations are underway continue today. they may not be direct between ukraine and russia, but they continue with the mediation of other states, it was turkey, it was other countries that are trying to build negotiation lines or lines of communication between ukraine and russia, plus there are specific cases in which such negotiations continue , they don’t really like to talk about them in the office, to admit them, but in fact they are, it’s an exchange of prisoners and... hostages taken hostage by russia, these were negotiations along the grain corridor, they are one way or another continued, and the others that are being talked about today, we do not have confirmation or denial, but in theory they exist, you know, when i

am asked about negotiations and any decisions there, i say that the war will always end with the signing of some document, even germany, which was... completely destroyed, destroyed and surrendered, she also signed the document, that is, it will be one way or another, but it is important that these negotiations and the achievement and signing of the capitulation there by the enemy were really in the interests of ukraine, in the interests of our state, and not in the interests of individual politicians or political goals, which very ... often play important roles instead of those positions that should stand in the first place? well, in this situation, i cannot help but recall the latest decision of the so-called ministry of internal affairs of russia, regarding the announcement of a wanted criminal

case against zelenskyi, that is, russia, judging by this step, is not going to sign any documents with zelenskyi and does not see zelenskyi as a person who would ... accept the capitulation of the russian federation? i think that these are public steps that are taking place, and the goal, the goal, which, among other things, they are laying a field of opportunity for themselves and in this direction that you are talking about, that they will pump, sorry for the lazy, pump history, in europe and in the united states after the 20th, well, here. it will be about the end of the president's term of office, you saw the statement of the so-called president lukashenka, who said that russia will not sign anything with zelensky after the 20th, what is the problem, and it's not even that much of a problem russia, our representatives, they, for some reason

, believe that this can lead to some internal political upheavals, this will not happen, no one in ukraine will withdraw from the maidans, no one will say that... there zelensky is legitimate or illegitimate, because this will lead to the weakening of the country, the key problem will not be here, the key problem will be... it will be in the countries of europe and the countries of the world, where russia today invests enormous amounts of money in leaders of public opinion in politicians, opposition politicians, because they are pro-government in almost all countries took pro-ukrainian position, and the opposition will choose some other, otherwise they will not be opposition, most likely they will take either a neutral or pro-russian policy, and russia also finances them, they finance journalists. they finance think-tanks, so-called, and these are huge funds

that they invest in their propaganda, in propaganda and planting their position, ukraine in this regard, financially we definitely cannot beat this, but from a political point of view, i am sure , that we are not ready, not you and i, but the ukrainian government, which has this to go ahead at least one or two steps, and we will lose in this regard, that is , the internal, internal political case played a very bad, bad joke with the representatives of the current government, and unfortunately, i think that russia will take advantage of this , this is a big problem for us, because i repeat once again, it will not lead to any global changes within the state, but it will lead to the issue of the end of the term of office of the president of ukraine. will be used by enemies and opponents of our state abroad

. dmitry piskov, press secretary yes the so-called president of russia, stated that the wanted announcement of president zelensky and his predecessor poroshenko is allegedly the result of the work of russian investigators and other relevant agencies. our respective departments are doing what they have to do, says piskov, there are large masses of information that our investigators are collecting. about the crimes of the authorities of ukraine, which is what we are talking about, that is why work is being carried out within this framework, and today it became known that the ministry of internal affairs of russia has declared a number of ukrainian politicians wanted, on the list is the former secretary of the nsdc, oleksiy danilo, ex-prime minister volodymyr groysman, ex-minister of internal affairs arsen avakov, former commander-in-chief of the armed forces ruslan hamchak, ex-head of the anti-terrorist center at the sbu vasyl krutov, ex-minister of foreign affairs pavlo klinkin and ex- minister of information. politicians lawyer dmytro oleksandrovych, there is not a single surname of a person who is included in the hundred most respected

politicians, the most influential politicians of the world according to the version of the time of this year, there is no yermak, why? i don't know, this is probably a question for yermak, his and there are no sanctions, that is, some of them were wanted today, yes, starting with president zelensky, poroshenko and all the others, he is under sanctions from all sides. the russian federation, for example, i have been there since the 20th year, if i am not mistaken, i am under the sanctions of russia, and yermak is not there, i do not think that they cannot underestimate the influence that the head of the office of the president of the state has today, why not i know, i think you can invite him, he will give a comprehensive answer to this, well, maybe they cannot rely on zelensky, but they can rely on ermak, well, that's the only way i can consider it. or at least i, you know, i try not to get into the heads of the russians,

let them live in their regime, but the question is, indeed, it is logical, i think that it would be better to get this answer from them, maybe tomorrow they in will submit, let's see, or get an answer from the management of the office, what could be the reason for this, maybe because they were in constant communication with representatives of ee... so-called russia before the full-scale invasion, maybe something the rest, i don't know, it's difficult for me to comment on this because, unfortunately or fortunately, i am not involved in the processes that take place, or the lack of these processes that take place in the office of the president, and in the decision-making of the so- called team with seven or six very effective or super-effective managers, by the way, they are also not in the list of those who are 5-6, because he is like that. did not name, i mean the president, i do not know, i do not know, and i am sure that

the state cannot manage five or six managers, even super-efficient ones, because it will lead to the fact that everything will fall apart and everything will move in the wrong direction that the state needs, this does not happen, there are no such unique people, it simply does not happen that with the hands of five or six people who can fight, engage in economy' . fight corruption, build an independent judicial system and lead the state to a happy future. we have a little bit of what zelensky said at the... final press conference in 2023 about these five or six managers, let's hear what about my team if i will get rid of my team, i have a small one, five or six managers, then we become weak with you, as far as, well, in principle one, one key thing here is

five or six managers, you know zelensky since october 2018 , you came to... in october 2018, and you basically, well, i characterized your role in this team as zelensky's understudy, no, i was never anyone's understudy, including zelensky, well, you were on tv channels, went on tv channels and spoke on behalf of zelenskyi's team when volodymyr oleksandrovich did not go there and i was afraid to go there, yes, but i'm sorry to interrupt you, i wasn't an understudy, well, maybe too much has been said about you, but you were the chief speaker of zelenskyi's headquarters, that's right. you know zelenskyi and this team very well, how in these 5 years, here is the fifth anniversary of zelenskyi, on may 20, as the president who was sworn in, how zelenskyi has changed, how this team has changed, which promised to bring new faces, and well, you

were also part of these new faces, how did i change all of those new faces there? never left. there were absolutely no one left, some five or six managers who were not there during the election campaign, and let's say about the understudy, i was not an understudy, because these are roles, i do not play roles, just as i was not a speaker, and i came out and said on the air what i personally believe, it was not written in us, you were the face of zelenskyi's team, yes, i think so, but not only the face. it wasn't engineered by technologists, i was saying what i believed and what i was going with, and it was a situation where i had to go on the air, i went on the air, the next day i i talked with serhiy shefir on

vasiletskyi and we had offices there, i asked a question, and i said, serge, look, i'm gone, see if it suits you. say okay, if it doesn't fit, i just won't go anymore, that later i blushed when it would change to be one of the ideologues, i think so, libertarianism is not mine, it's stefanchuk's, everything else, i think so, on the other hand, i am often accused of having listened there, you know, i did not listen to zelenskyi, i wanted the parliament to be, the political power of the servants of the people, but not for in name, but in fact, do i have everything? it didn’t work out, that’s why i remain in politics today and will continue to work on it, but what you ask as a question, i was asked how zelensky changed, it’s hard for me to say, because zelensky was largely absent during the election campaign, he engaged in other issues, the boards were their property, but the

semantic burdens, the president was not globally involved in them, so we did not really... communicate, we started communicating more when he became the president, and i became chairman of the verkhovna rada, he has changed, i think that yes, i really think that he has changed, isn’t it better, if you base it on my personal opinion, no, well, we as a whole probably have different approaches to him, i would always believe that it is necessary to attract people who may be smarter than me, and because this is strengthening me, strengthening the team, not from five or six managers, but simply strengthening. the president's team probably still has different approaches, but everyone chooses their own path, or has it changed, you know, any power is a disaster, absolute power is an absolute disaster, i think that it is possible to characterize what is happening today in this way, but it is clear that the presidential elections are not on time, it is clear that the parliamentary elections are not on time, well, this

means, well, considering what we see, what, what, whatever i didn't do the presidential job there. team, in principle, it will be their responsibility, no one from the society, from the civil society there can blame them, because when the journalists take over the power there, they get letters on the door of evacuees and receive subpoenas, uh, politicians get also some criminal cases, there is something else, that is, it means that the more, the longer we do not have elections, the more there is a... threat that we will slide into authoritarianism, into a dictatorship, is there, is there such a threat? any, full power concentrated in one hand, it is bad. well, monopolies are immune responsibility. yes, but the office learned to translate it very well. today they are trying to translate it, i know that they do not like the deputies,

and for the most part, according to many of my colleagues, if you can call them that, it is true. but what is happening today is translation responsibility from the office to the verkhovna rada or to the cabinet. today there is no verkhovna rada. today there is no cabinet of ministers of ukraine, there is a department under the office of the president. for the approval of legal or legal decisions made in the president's office, and there is a department for their implementation, one is called the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the other is the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, no more. today, these two key bodies for the existence of the state are not decision-making points, you know, we are already joking, why nothing comes to the verkhovna rada, because the russians said that i would go to decision-making centers, but neither the verkhovna rada nor the cabinet are such centers today. but it would be funny if, this is very black humor, but if you and i are talking about approaches in general, then

i believe that today's elections cannot be held objectively, because ah, who are we, stefanchuk told about studying international experience, how elections should be conducted during war, something he had already stopped studying, he must have studied, or after the president said that everyone who talks about... elections under during the war, then it was treason to work in russia, stefanchuk decided that he no longer needed to work in russia, but seriously, i suggest to all those smart people who say that they know how to hold elections today according to the current system, precisely according to the current system send them, including stefanchuk, organize a curfew for them, or in new york, or even in konstantinovka, but if they do it there, if they are still alive,... after the elections, well, then i will shake their hands, i will say well done, but to be honest, i think they have it it will not work in the first place, because they are afraid to go there, it is very easy

to tell from kyiv how to love the motherland, how to hold elections, but people who have never been involved in this and do not understand what kind of process it is, then they can do it only on paper and from tv screens, and not directly with pens, this is the first thing regarding the holding of elections, indeed today they cannot be held either from an organizational point of view or from a legal point of view, but the only authority to which there are no questions today is verkhovna the council of ukraine, it is clearly stated that its authority continues until the end of the martial law, it is clearly stated in the constitution and laws, and based on this, the council will not work independently of anything, until the end of full-scale. invasion before the end of the war. well, if the council will work, someone questions the powers of the president, and it is russia that questions, i will emphasize once again, these powers, why, why

then zelenskyi’s team, how can you understand the logic, why they did not receive the opinion of the constitutional court and did not place full stop, because in ukraine only the constitutional court can interpret the constitution, and they would have this verdict constitutional, they would say... and to the europeans, we have a higher legislative body that interprets, a legislative, the only body that can interpret the constitution and the constitution, and the conformity of laws to the constitution, and they said, listen, well, this moscow is doing something of its own propaganda, but we have such a conclusion, all the answers, all the answer options that i will name now, you will not like , the first, they don't have it had enough sense, secondly, the answer that the constitutional court would give is not suitable for them, well , there are various conversations, experts talk about the fact that they went to talk to the constitutional court, we received such

an answer that neither zelenskyi nor his office was satisfied, i don't know how true this is, it's hard for me to talk about it, well, what powers, for example , would have to emerge and it is necessary to transfer the powers to stefanchuk voluntarily, that is, there really is no clearly written norm in the constitution, how it should act president, this is a unique situation, but there is no continuation of powers, what the circles are saying, and, again, this may be my opinion, this may be your opinion, and by and large, what is mine, what is yours could be to sneeze, if there was, there would be a decision of the constitutional court, where it was written that the president's authority continues until the end of the martial law in ukraine, period, and it doesn't matter what razumkov thinks, what ivanov thinks, what petrenko, siderenko, or whoever thinks.. someone else has solutions, we may have different ones opinions, but they do not carry any, any semantic load, just as if it were

written that in the decision of the constitutional court. that he should transfer, for example, the powers to the chairman of the verkhovna rada to stefanchuk, so that stefanchuk will continue to steer these processes, this is also a possible option for the development of events, but it should have been done in the following way, it should have been done last year by the 23rd president on his own, in order not to create some kind of political game out of this, so that later it is not told that someone is playing into the hands of moscow, or is not playing into the hands of moscow, to leave apply to the constitutional court, you asked the right question, get an answer. as it is, well, it would be logical that he extended his powers, or made another decision and said that look, such and such a decision should be that the president should voluntarily transfer the powers of the chairman of the verkhovna rada, or continue their powers until the end of martial law and that's all, it doesn't matter, i repeat once again, they are always afraid of the loss of power, but they are afraid of it from the wrong side, once again... i repeat that there is no

poroshenko, there is no tymoshenko, no group, no voice, no intelligent politician will come out there on the maidan and say: everything, this, this tsar has gone bad, don’t eat the next one, that won’t happen, it ’s logical and understandable, but it will definitely be used russia outside the borders of our state, where the influence of the president is, there is internal censorship... it is not working, and they will undermine it, and unfortunately, today's situation, which is taking place against the background of the upcoming elections in the european parliament and the upcoming elections in the united states of america, with taking into account those candidates who will participate in elections and who can win and taking into account their personal relationship with the current president of ukraine may lead to...

serious negative consequences, unfortunately, russia has this resource, which they will definitely use, but ours is the government, it always concentrates on the smallest problems, but which are under their noses, to further see how it will unfold in world geopolitics, they do not know how, this is a problem, it is not a problem for them, it is a problem for the state, for the state in which you and i live, and for and... the existence of which today the armed forces of ukraine are fighting. well, maybe, maybe volodymyr oleksandrovich thinks that if he leaves this post, then without him the state institutions will not work, that the army will not work, no, the army will not work, because he is the supreme commander, and well , this can be explained by the fact that does a person think more about the state in this situation than about his own interests, or vice versa? you can explain, but

not accept. i will explain why, there is a law, there is a constitution, there is a constitutional court, and you should not proceed from what you think, you can believe one thing, he will believe another, i will believe a third, but contrary to what we believe, there is a law that every public servant or every politician, every one, even if you think you are… the most, the most, the most necessary for the state at the moment, and you have, and you think that you will do as you want, because then it may not turn against you, again, it is the own political ambitions of any politician or a political figure, these are his personal problems, it can to overturn the attitude towards the country, the attitude towards the government that exists in the state on the part

of international partners and lead to negative consequences, this cannot be allowed, but for the most part ukrainian politicians continue to live in the regime, i want it this way, or i think so, and not so determined by law, and it will be good for the country. well, when you were dismissed, you did not resist with your hands and feet and said: no, no, i will not leave my post, because i was elected, i will be the head of the verkhovna rada for as long as it takes. no, i have always said that i will not hold on to position, i will tell you more, if it was fundamental for me to stay in this position, i would have stayed in it, but then i had to be more flexible to no, i have to be able to compromise my principles, and i don't want to compromise my principles, they are worth much more to me than positions, because i really don't want...