is related to the date of the fifth five-year term of zelenskyi's presidency, well, we understand that, probably, in one way or another, the parliament would like to listen to the president, and society should also listen to the president, i'm not saying that what was blocked tribune, that this is a consequence of the fact that today is the first day when, as russian propaganda claims, zelenskyi did not... no, it is about what is obvious, both ukrainian people's deputies and ordinary ukrainians, they would like to hear from the president zelenskyi, what did he succeed, what did he fail to do in these 5 years, yes or no otherwise, he went with an election program, he could have talked about why he failed to do what he succeeded in doing, what he failed to do, but president zelenskyi instead gave an interview to rozloge reuters and said that because of... military state, his five-year

term is still running, that's why we probably won't be told about what, actually, he thinks about his 5 years as president, it's true what zelensky told foreign journalists, let's listen now, my 5 years are not over yet, because of martial law, they continue, i can't to evaluate one's activities, it seems to me... that it's just, well, not very ethical, i think that the view is always fair somewhere on the side, a little, and i will not argue with this view, to be honest, and i'm not going to, well, justice is for her always somewhere in the middle, mr. rostyslav, when it comes to the results or the president's report for 5 years, why... president zelenskyi says

that it is not entirely ethical, although, well, if you were the president and remain the president, then obviously you have something to say without too much modesty or any words bowing to foreign journalists, well , i absolutely agree, you know, politicians are obliged to report to society, because politicians and officials, and no one else, are hired. society is employees who, under certain conditions and with certain powers , must perform their functions for society, and society certainly has the right to hear a report in 5 years, again, neither this nor everything that happened in the verkhovna rada, it has nothing to do with it to the so-called question of legitimacy, article 108 of the constitution is exhaustive responds to any speculation, it is clear that the president is exercising his powers. to

the election of his successor, and the law tells us that the election is possible only after the end of the war, so the full stop and any russian insinuations here, they are of no use, but the society certainly has the right to hear from the president how he evaluates those five years, which were allocated to him for the execution of his powers, for the implementation of that bright program with which he came, remember, he had a dream there, he said there that all the news would be bright and bright... well, it didn't happen as expected, but for some reason he decided that the report would close the meeting with some journalists, if i understand correctly, the espresso channel was not allowed to this meeting, so we can only tell something you can see cheats there, and indeed there was an interview with the foreign agency reuters, where we can also see it in some fragments, i believe that it is irresponsible. and ukrainian society,

which is currently struggling, because it is not the president, the entire ukrainian society is currently struggling with with the russian invasion, he definitely has the right to hear the president, it is best that journalists have the opportunity to ask questions about the past and the future, and about how the president sees the situation that has arisen, the reasons, and what he will do next. if, mr. rostislav, you had the opportunity to ask zelensky about... the results of five years, what would you ask him? what lessons have been learned and when should we expect conclusions from these lessons, first of all, when a government of national unity will be formed, which would allowed to rely on all the resources of society. mr. mykhailo, how do you assess the absence of this report and what zelenskyi says about the fact that my 5 years have not yet passed... there is still

a lot ahead, or whether you, as a people's deputy of ukraine, receive information from the president of ukraine is enough , because today, for example, i was reproached in social networks, why are you asking zelensky about this, if you want to know zelensky's report, look at his posts every day, he reports to you every day, i say, it's a little different, because what says zelenskyi informs me every day about some current events and draws some conclusions from something, and i would like to ask zelenskyi about all his plans, it is clear that the war has started, and have these plans been destroyed? but really, a person has nothing to talk about, including in the session hall of the verkhovna rada, it could have been very nice and really united the entire political elite when the president said: listen, five years ago, i came to you to tell you, here's what we

did, what we didn't do, let's give the term that i have left, i don't know how long will my presidential term be, but let's do this, this and this and that, please, well, first of all... i want to support my colleague that, in fact, president zelenskyi is legitimate. article 103 of the constitution says that the president is elected for 5 years, but the same constitution, article 108, says that the president ceases to hold office after the election of the newly elected and when he begins to perform his duties. the constitution guarantees, the constitution of ukraine guarantees. integrity of the authorities, and this is positive, president zelenskyi is legitimate, this was recognized and parliamentary parties, factions, and we signed about it jointly during international conferences, including one with monet,

an international organization, this is important, next, we see the recognition of european partners, and all and... this says the laws of ukraine, which under during martial law , it is impossible to hold any democratic elections, period. of course, president zelenskyi will have, i am sure, an opportunity in front of the ukrainian people when it ends. and i, in fact, like millions of ukrainians, would like it from the president hear a few things. first of all, when the war ends, and... what the president and the team will do to ensure that millions of ukrainians return home from abroad, this is also an important thing, and what the authorities will do to ensure that during the great reconstruction there are enough resources and sufficient salary for

the people, in fact the president and the government, and the verkhovna rada is also the government, not enough... enough has been done to first of all be ready for war, and this is clear, and the next thing is that, apparently, all of us together with the president was made so that the war already ended, but there are also objective reasons that depend not only on ukraine, on ukrainian society, as well as on our partners, whom we thank for their help, but of course, if it... was on time and in sufficient quantity, then probably today we would already be talking about completely different things. at the time when zelenskyi, well, that's enough, we talked about what he achieved there, or

let's say, he didn't stop talking, he said that my five years are not over yet, mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the office of the president of ukraine, all after all, he announced the main changes that... took place during the 5 years of zelenskyi's presidency. let's listen to what mykhailo podeliak said. first, the influence of the oligarchy as such on state institutions has been significantly reduced. secondly, it is clearly understood what subjectivity is. today, ukraine has a completely different level of subjectivity, its word has been heard in foreign markets, and this will significantly affect where we will be tomorrow, who we will be tomorrow, and so on. the third, of course. and today we are talking about the fact that ukraine will acquire membership in other alliances, in other unions, economic, military and so on, and will finally put an end to its soviet history, and by the way, this war is just about a point in soviet history, it will be done precisely thanks to the tenure of mr. zelensky. sir,

mr. rostislav, what do you think of such a short conclusion, in five years, it 's doubtful to say the least. theses there about oligarchs, and because there are five or six managers who took over influence, and unconstitutional and illegal, as well. regarding european integration, well, we remember that back in february 19, amendments were made to the constitution and the association agreement was signed and so on, but you know, i wouldn't even compete here, who did more there, i would just ask one really simple question, here they are ready to report on the facts, why ukraine was not preparing for a big war, what if you did not answer this question, i think that... a lot would actually become clear and those people who were directly responsible for the preparation

should be held responsible. mr. mykhailo, did you try to explain the distance that happened in these 5 years in a sufficiently reasoned way and did you? i agree with the thesis that oligarchs as such have ceased to exist, well, apart from the fact that they really took over the functions of oligarchs. other people, and these resources, television resources, for which zelenskyi's team began to compete in the fall of 2021, we remember, the conflict is open with rinat akhmetov, he was accused there of almost preparing, by the way, a coup d'état, this is also many already forgot, but that was all, as leonid danylovich kuchma said, that was all, and mr. general, are podalyak's arguments convincing about these five years maybe zelenskyi’s team should draw some intermediate conclusions and

somehow share them with the ukrainians, because it is really important for the next president, whoever he is, well, i think that we will still have the opportunity to hear president zelenskyi and clearly, from his mouth from the first source. yes, as he assesses his first term of office, it is clear, if we talk about arguments, then in fact, it is the merit of the entire ukrainian people that we have such a powerful army today, the strongest, i i emphasize, the nato army, by military experience and by education, because countries are already studying here. we have certain problems

with communication, mr. general, we had some problems with communication, yes, that is, it is the merit of the entire ukrainian people that we have created such a powerful army, which today shows examples of training for other nato partners, this is clear, and this is a merit, including , of course, zelensky, because he is the law. of the constitution, there is a supreme commander-in-chief, at what cost, that is a completely different question, i think that we will still have the opportunity to listen president zelenskyi more than once that he reports what was done by him personally, as the president and his team, but once again i emphasize that it is very important that those who... present what was done, at what cost, and not forget did not forget that all of us are courageous

ukrainian people. thank you, mr. general, one more topic is quite important, it is one way or another a part of these five years of zelensky's presidency, it is what is happening in the information space during the last two years. i already mentioned this story for a reason. 2021, when president zelenskyi and his team clearly understood that the next presidential term, or the struggle for power even before the war, when they considered this struggle for the next term or there for the next power, would somehow be connected with tv, and i think , that in the fall of 21st year they could not even dream that they would have to, or would be able to bring together all these channels that belonged or on... owned by ukrainian oligarchs, and create a single telethon. on february 24

, 2022, such a single telethon was created, after in april, three tv channels, espresso the fifth and direct were thrown out of t2 of digital broadcasting, i.e. we were removed as competitors of a single telethon and simply thrown out of t2, by the way, no one has explained or apologized until now, and why exactly happened and no one renewed us. in these t2, but what happened during the last month around the public, obviously, and you witnessed it, not only journalists discussed and read and heard. uh , including comments from the public, and today what probably should have happened happened: the public broadcaster has actually withdrawn from the national telethon edyni novini and is returning to full-fledged broadcasting on its own tv channel number one, on the website of the public broadcaster it is called the expansion of its own broadcasting in the edyni novini marathon (i quote

the public broadcaster). the production of own content on the first channel expands the social team. within the framework of an integral part of the telethon edyni novini ua together, we are ready for our part to maximally strengthen broadcasting, to share high-quality documentaries, regional stories, current investigations and use the opportunities of the largest network of correspondents in ukraine across the country, said the statement of the chairman of the board of the public mykola chernotytskyi, the head of the supervisory board of the public svitlana ostapa called such a decision a civilized separation of the public from the telethon. adding that the company received written guarantees for such actions and that they do not violate the decision of the national security council. mr. rostyslav, how would you assess what is currently happening with the single telethon and the exit of public, does this mean that gradually everyone the tv channels that were included in this pool will also leave it, because it is clear that

the oligarchs are probably also thinking about their future and about the future. the political future of ukraine is already post-war, and they, too, need to regain power on their tv channels. well, first of all, i want to wish my colleagues social success and creative realization, i read about this step with great respect, because they had been qualitatively different from the other participants for a long time. marathon, in particular, they returned to journalistic standards, to standards presentation of different opinions, to a balanced presentation of information, they supported, actually invited representatives of various political forces and supported an absolutely healthy

direction in that constructive criticism can be heard in the comments with a view to what should be done better? and it seems to me that if the entire marathon followed this example, the whole country would win, and we would not state that the marathon has simply outlived its usefulness. in my opinion, this is exactly the case, so i believe that the public has done absolutely a healthy and correct step, but as for the oligarchs and everything else, look, almost all the channels, the participants of the marathon made doubles for themselves, made various entertainment channels there. programs and so on, which are broadcast with almost the same name so that people do not forget the brand, and thus, i understand, they are trying to stay in the marathon and not lose the audience, and probably they will play something similar for in order to continue to influence the audience, well, what

about literally the last comment about television in general, its role in influencing society and... the like, well, the very fact of how much the influence of social networks has spread in our country now, how much telegram, god forbid, with all its anonymous carriers, youtube, tiktok and everything else, how much now in sociological surveys people say that prefer these media as information sources, then this is a reason for almost all editors to think, therefore... i wish success here to the editors of spresso and pryamoy and the fifth, which came decently despite the performance from digital broadcasting, and and expanded their audience in fact, and now to the public collective, which is also called, welcome to the freedom club, and this is a chance to show class and

still win back the audience from anonymous telegram channels. thank you, mr. rostislav. mr. general, tell me, how do you evaluate the work of the united telethon and what does the output of this, a part, a large part, mean, because the public are big broadcasters of what is happening there, our western partners are paying attention, because for them it is very important, in fact, public is a big team professionals who were formed and today demonstrate quality. content and the fact that they made such a difficult decision indicates that despite the special regime of martial law. after all, there are certain signs of a democratic society in the state, because let's not forget that the public is financed

by the community, that is, ukrainian society, and ultimately coincides with the name, and i would like to thank them, they actually endured this period, a difficult period, and by... . to wish them that the product gained more quality, and i i'm sure it's an increase in competition among the journalism community, especially television, because they will have the opportunity to be on the air for more time, to show a quality product, as they said, more regional broadcasting, and i'm sure that this will only benefit the whole... society , in the telethon, of course, those who are responsible for it will once again realize that it is necessary to increase the quality and, after all

, to study more the demand of the viewer, but during the operation of the martial law, it should be remembered that the theme of the war, the topic of national security, because it is journalism. this is another front, this information front, which we often, unfortunately, lose to the enemy, and here we need a state policy, and for the national council for television and radio broadcasting to still support those tv channels, including the respected spresso tv channel, where, after all, there is a statist policy and support for the armed forces of ukraine, and... of course, all those social needs, including economic security, because without a strong economic front,

it is difficult for the military to actually have sufficient victories on the military front. thank you, mr. mykhailo, mr. rostislav, a very short question, maybe i hope for a short answer, maybe according to these draft laws that you insist on, the verkhovna rada will consider the issue after all. the situation in the media sphere with mass media, including three tv channels, because in fact it is about such usurpation of power in the media sphere and the use of this power against journalists against media projects? very short answer: that's how we'll go about it to insist, as well as on expanding the openness of the meetings of the verkhovna rada. thank you, gentlemen, for participating in the program, it was rostyslav pavlenko and mykhailo. tsymbalyuk, friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are watching us live now on youtube and facebook,

please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey, it is already coming to an end, we will ask you during the two hours of the broadcast whether ukraine needs a tax on childlessness let's see the results of the survey that we had on tv in... so 17% yes and 83% no on youtube we have approximately the same ratio 17% yes 83% no, and actually we see that the majority of our viewers are against this tax on childlessness, which was proposed by serhii hryvko, deputy of the servant of the people and who withdrew his bill, literally just these days this happened. he proposed to introduce a tax on childlessness for people who do not have children at all, who have one or two children, there should be a demographic tax, that is, it just wanted to copy what is offered in

russia, what was once the case in the soviet union, but thank god it did not happen. on this, friends, i put a full stop, i wish everyone a good night and take care of yourself and your relatives, this is the most important thing, we will meet you tomorrow at 20:00. goodbye, tingling, numbness or tingling in the limbs occur spontaneously and disturb you. a special complex of active substances of dolgita antineuralgia helps to normalize the functioning of the nervous system. dolgit antineuralgia helps to return to usual activities without subjugation and numbness at the end.

fm halychyna. listen to yours. i remember bitargin. the morning will be without a hangover. in the camera. your country is located in an area where during the great patriotic war. the leg of a soviet soldier was standing, not a cape from this region, we will not go, oh, there are no potatoes, you bring, already, but my son, apply the comfrey ointment of dr. tais and get up to work again, ointment with comfrey, german ointment for pain in the joints and m' yazakh, oops,

natural ointment... in the latest edition of the magazine ukraine. bill 5655. reform or corruption trap. country investigation. when and how crimea will return to ukraine. interview with the chairman of the mejlis ryfat chubarov. how did the defense of kyiv actually take place? colonel oleksandr vdovichenko of the zsu. memories of the brilliant ukrainian translator mykola lukash and many other stories and analytics. with the country in the center of the main. ask for the magazine " at

points of sale. to feel life, not heartburn, take hyalera. hyalera. victory over heartburn. dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. dolgit cream. you can also walk. dolgit is the only yellow cream for joint pain. there are discounts, presented by coco may discounts. on tizin. 20% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. every week, the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and the world. vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv and invited experts based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. if you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday politics club, every saturday

on espresso. see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. judicial reform and ukraine's path to the eu are under threat. if there is a failure of any european integration for us, then we will be in this limbo for an infinite number of times. but why does the supreme court leave unscrupulous judges in their positions? i bought it for what i sold it for. on thursday , may 23, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatyana. i'm on the espresso tv channel. join the ranks of the 100th separate mechanized brigade of the armed forces of ukraine. protect yours. the result of their work is our safety. they, the boys from volyn, proved that everyone can be a warrior, strong in spirit, they appreciate the ability to stand side by side with their brothers until the holy victory. everyone who pilots a uav understands aita, prepares, treats, repairs, rolls kilometers of roads, fills piles

of documents and... strengthens those who cover the enemy with heavy fire and return our native land meter by meter. join the ranks of the 100th separate mechanized brigade of the armed forces of ukraine. let's stick together. 2:00 p.m. in ukraine, to your attention a news release on the spresso tv channel, in the studio of iryna koval, greetings to all viewers, just now i will tell you about the most important events of this time. therefore, the number of victims in chuguyev has increased, already eight were injured as a result of the morning attack. the russians shelled the central part of the city, the kindergarten was damaged.