possibility, or even biden's statement that ukraine will become a member of nato, it will fuel these fears. so, biden is playing international politics by saying that the us is not pushing for ukraine's membership in nato today. he should have said: i don't see that happening right now. he was not careful in his statements, but this is not the first time he has done so. the bottom line is that one should not attach too much importance to his statement. "if ukraine continues to meet the criteria, then after the end of this war , ukraine has very good chances quickly to join nato. yes, these are extremely important signals, but, for example, if we talk about the specifics, we understand that the guarantee for those conditions or those parameters to be acceptable to us means the liberation of our territories temporarily occupied by the enemy. another point is that the enemy included them in its composition and even

voted, well, the so-called voting procedure in the state duma, when we talk about our temporarily occupied territories, and we also understand that the rest of the issues there are already questions, so to speak , auxiliary, the key story is the territories, and we see that the enemy is only increasing its presence, conducting extremely active hostilities, where do you think putin will try to pull now? this is the reality of this horrific...invasion that putin has launched. he started an aggressive war, violating international law and occupying ukrainian territory. he continues to take steps to legitimize illegal political arrangements in these occupied ukrainian territories, which is a further violation of international law. war is a continuation politics by other means, so putin uses the war against ukraine to achieve his political goals, including the occupation and integration of these... territories into

the russian federation. no one in europe, the united states or our other allies around the world will ever recognize such actions by russia. ukraine can settle the situation in its favor only by winning on the battlefield. and that is why it is so important that the ukrainian armed forces grow numerically. the troops fighting on the front lines are exhausted and needy rest and rotation. therefore, ukrainians, first of all men, should join the lavmia. in the usa and europe should provide ukraine with more weapons that it needs, to do it on time, and not with such long delays of six months as last time, this is unacceptable. we should have done a long time ago what president biden finally agreed to do, which is to allow ukraine to use the weapons provided to retaliate against russian forces on the territory of the russian federation who are planning or have already launched another attack on ukraine. yes, it is.

an extremely important moment, and at the same time we are grateful to the american administration and personally to president joseph biden for his efforts, which he has already demonstrated, when we are talking about money in the amount of more than 61 billion, and about weapons, and now we see that the united the states will most likely mature to allow the use of american weapons on russian territory, we are not talking about temporarily occupied ukrainian lands, actually on russian territory. this is a very important, essential point. we understand that no one is going to beat atakams on the mausoleum lenin in particular, we are talking about specific military facilities located near the border. but still, this is an extremely important military-psychological decision. in my opinion, this step is long overdue. it is absolutely ridiculous that president biden has allowed himself to be held back by cold war-era fears that russia could provoke a strategic nuclear confrontation. with the united states

over the war in ukraine. it is clear and absolutely obvious that biden was guided by these fears. putin's threats clearly affected him. and i understand that what has happened is that the secretary of defense, general austin, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, general brown, and the national security advisor, jake sullivan, have come to the same conclusion that i just formulated: ukraine must be able to defend itself, in case russia resumes. and attacks on kharkiv from russian territory. according to international law, ukraine should be able to strike russian military facilities and personnel if they are preparing or have already launched attacks on ukraine, hitting the ukrainian military, or, worst of all, the civilian population in kharkiv. i also understand that after secretary of state blinken's last visit to kyiv, and his discussions with president zelenskyi and others, he returned to washington convinced that... it is time to go to

president biden and tell him that it is time to make a different decision. thank goodness president biden was persuaded and he finally agreed to do what made sense. from the beginning, now i believe that what the us had to suppress, the american exhibited the leadership of nato is not in the best light. i was in london last week and i spoke to some high-ranking officials there, and it was clear to us that it was foreign secretary david cameron, nato secretary general stoltenberg, and previously french president emmanuel macron who pushed. they all seem to have backed president biden into a corner. macron suggested that it is possible that one day french troops could be on the territory of ukraine, and cameron and stoltenberg emphasized that ukraine should have the opportunity to use the weapons we provide against russian forces that are preparing or have already attacked ukraine. if biden continued to

resist these important nato allies, us leadership in nato would be called into question. in the end, he made the right decision, but unfortunately, so much damage was done both to the us's reputation as the leader of nato, and of course, to poor ukraine, all those months until it could strike military targets in russia. yes, thank you very much, this is an extremely important analysis of what is happening now. on the other hand, me you mentioned president macron. i sometimes have the feeling that i'm watching an mtv fashion show, we hear very loud statements, see very cool videos, but in fact, instead of an italian restaurant, then we go somewhere. we eat pizza, that is, we would like to get even more, on the other hand, we understand that our realities are quite difficult, and if, for example, we talk about specific bold decisions from president joseph biden, what could we hope for and what would we have the right to claim subject to the fact that

now there is a process of negotiations to sign a security agreement with america, and we understand that the key story is to fill any... agreement with very concrete, real things, yes, but we also understand that the war must be ended more quickly with our victory. key story how to do it as soon as possible. at this stage , it is important for ukraine to insist that president biden clearly and publicly declare that the goal of the united states is the victory of ukraine, that is, not simply avoiding defeat and not worrying about escalation on the part of russia. speaking of president macron, in his own. in a well-known statement , he said that russia should not be humiliated. so, russia is humiliating itself, and we should not care if it is humiliated or not? russia can end its humiliation by returning to international law and stopping the killing of ukrainian

civilians and the destruction of ukraine's energy infrastructure. russia is defeated in a battle, and thereby also humiliates itself. therefore , i believe that it is very important that all nato allies, and... also us allies in australia, south korea, japan and other countries clearly stated that ukraine should win and russia should lose, period. as for what could be included in a us-ukrainian security agreement, i don't know what exactly is being discussed, but it should all be based on the fact that ukraine must win and be able to permanently deter russia from rebooting and attacking ukraine again. my former colleagues are now actively working. over the details of this agreement. of course, i would not expect guarantees like article five, since ukraine is not yet a member of nato, but there will definitely be elements that would include providing advanced american weapons and allowing them to be used on russian territory if necessary

to stop and deter further russian attacks. i am sure that the security guarantee will also include certain military exercises. dear mr. ambassador, i agree with you . side, we understand that the key story is the question of terms, the terms of the end of the war with our victory, and we also understand that now the president of the united states, biden, is not in the best electoral situation, i on my part, i wish him victory, he is predictable and a decent politician, on the other hand, we understand that there is also the team of president biden, and there is also the team of one of the candidates donald trump, well, maybe there are such feelings that... that the president's team joseph biden is preparing to hand over the baton to the team before the provision of weapons was delayed and there was a ban on the use of these weapons on the territory of russia, and trump's instinct will push him to conclude an agreement with putin over

the heads and behind the backs of not only the leaders of ukraine, but also all our european allies trump's america policy shows above all that he does not care about nato. he does not like our europeans. allies and went to a confrontation with them as soon as he came to power, saying that nato was obsolete. when trump remained in power, and the burden of responsibility fell on him to be not only the leader of the most powerful country in the world, but also the most powerful military-political alliance, his behavior changed somewhat. he was the first president to offer javelin anti-tank missiles to ukraine. glory thank god he did, but his rhetoric suggests that he would once again prefer to strike a deal with his much-admired friend, vladimir putin, by forcing ukraine to cease hostilities and cede its territory, which would ultimately the result is a complete geo'. a strategic disaster for russia itself. i mean, it could lead to further

conflict between russia and the west, in which russia would be completely defeated. thank you very much , mr. ambassador, for this extremely important conversation on the espress tv channel. and i would like to remind our tv viewers that matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council, worked for them. thank you. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. there are discounts that represent unbreakable discounts on psilovalzamgel 15% in travel pharmacies for you and savings. allergy as if leo will overcome ci3 leo. c3 neo protects against the most common allergens. try flebodia 600. pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids. plebodia 600. treat hemorrhoids without

any side effects. there are discounts, they represent unbreakable discounts on troxivgel. 15% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espres tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time, i and my colleagues will talk about the most important thing, two hours to learn about the war, about the military, frontline component, serhiy zgurets, and what is the world living on? yuriy fizar is already with me, and it's time to talk about what was happening outside of ukraine, yuriy, good evening, two hours to keep up with economic news, time to talk about money during the war, oleksandr morchivka is next to me, and sports news, i invite yevhen pastukov to a conversation for two hours in the company of favorite presenters, about news.

winters, a project for smart and caring people, events of the day in two hours, vasyl's big broadcast in the evening on espresso. hello, how are you there? it's normal, slowly! so we got nine new tanks, guess what? now turn on the video link, i 'll give you a tour. come on, we 'll be here for another two weeks, i'll give you a ride, and not only on a tank. yes, here near the station in grozivka, will you say that you will be admitted to the student? well, yes, student, that's my call sign. yes, near here.

student, today you do not observe information security, tomorrow iskanders will visit you, does the enemy hear? and now oleg rybachuk, ex-head of president viktor yushchenko's secretariat, former vice-prime minister for european integration of ukraine and co-founder of the chesno movement, will work on the espresso tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. oleg, i congratulate you. congratulations to the heroes. well, june is extremely busy. when we talk about public and private conversations between the administration of president biden and

the administration of president zelensky, the exchange of certain opinions in the public space, of course , all this is happening on the eve of the big g7 meeting, which will smoothly transition to the swiss format, where the peace formula will be discussed, what is being said publicly in your opinion , and what is most important is not being talked about publicly, when we talk about certain parameters without... a security situation, it should be noted that there is indeed such a surge in the activity of the international, in particular, in the schedule of the president of ukraine, two meetings with president biden, further. a representative forum is expected in switzerland, we can say how fateful it is there, what issues will be resolved there, this is another question, but as they say about the elections, the turnout there will be quite high, and the key story, the swiss peace forum, what issues will be discussed, we understand that three key cases will be discussed there, yes,

in particular, they will talk about nuclear safety, well, in particular, about the prospects of use or non -use. the enemy of nuclear weapons, the chinese it won't be there, we understand that the prime minister is changing in india, that is, the situation, as they said, the classics are quite dynamic, yes, quite dynamic, and the elections are starting, in my opinion, voting for the elections to the european parliament is already starting today in the netherlands , and changes in the european parliament almost predict an increase in the right of radical forces, not all of these forces are anti-european. but it is clear that the situation in the european parliament can be quite difficult, and this must also be remembered, because for you and i it is extremely important in europe, as regards switzerland, expectations from switzerland, i personally do not have any special expectations there, i understand that the closer we got to this summit, then several factors played

their role, for some reason we in ukraine paid too much... much attention to china and china's participation , china, he felt it subtly and, directly or through allies, significantly diluted our position at this swiss forum, because at first ukraine clearly said that this is our war, we are fighting, this is our peace formula, and the forum is gathering to support the formula of peace from zelenskyi, and in recent days the position has already blurred, already... they are talking about the fact that there may be other proposals from other countries of the same china or brazil or turkey, that is, the peace formula in zelenskyi's editorial office is no longer the only document. further, we remember that there were 10 points in this peace formula, and we hoped that for each of the points , such interest groups would be created and

a certain solution would be worked out. now , in reality, what you just mentioned is that we are talking about three topics for discussion, three directions, it's me... security, food security and exchange of prisoners of war. in the end, china officially announced that it would not be on this form, but managed to influence, and ukraine was forced to make certain concessions, which in principle do not help us very much, because we need to have a clear position, and china, the chinese there are plans, meetings, including the next one from the peace forum and... and here, too , the question arises, if we at this swiss peace forum can adopt some very vague resolution, then this will not indicate a unified position of all participants, of which more than 100 are expected, and then literally after a few months we fly to some other forum, where russia should already be,

because at first the logic was quite clear, we wanted to have such a consolidated one. the position of the world, of democracy in the world, which would speak very clearly about the inadmissibility of border violations, responsibility for aggression, where you could formulate a position with which you could come to russia and say: look, here is the whole world, 100 countries of the world have such a view, now you have to think how will you, russia, introduce yourself in relation to, to the vast majority of countries in the world, and now this... it is not happening, because most likely in switzerland we will not receive some very clear and understandable communique or statement, then the next meeting already there will be russia, and russia is a master of breeding tereveni, well, this is essentially a chinese platform and a chinese idea, that is, the chinese wanted to nullify or

diminish the status of the global forum in switzerland dedicated to uniforms. peace and, accordingly, create some alternative structure, an alternative summit, wherever it may be present, in particular the aggressor state, the russian federation, the chinese would like to manipulate in this whole matter somehow, we understand correctly, they manipulated quite successfully, now thanks to their position, i am sure, from countries such as brazil , we increasingly hear explanations for the fact that russia will not be there, well, except that today sziarto announced that... he will make the forum happy with his presence and hungary will be represented at the level of his sziarto, such changes have taken place, well, this is the case for everything in... hungary heard the call of belgium, which is now presides over to the european union, that hungary should be deprived of its right to vote, because it is in agreement with the position of the european union,

maybe this is a factor or something else, well, but i don't think that this is such a big event, whether it will add to the prospects or success of the forum, i have we mean the representation of hungary at the riart, how such forums can affect the situation related to... war, so we understand that war is not only about, i don't know, combat operations, but also about resources for their provision, we understand, position of the united states thank god, corrected, so the size of 61 billion dollars plus. on the other hand, the rather non-trivial opinion of the president of the united states, biden, was heard in one of the interviews: " well, in order to ensure ukrainian security, in principle, it is possible not to join nato. it is on the agenda." summit, this will not be a question either, they will find some very strong regular signals, well, that's how biden's position is changing, well, he hinted, he

even went on to say why, he said, as the vice president had dozens of meetings there, visited ukraine, and he hated this word corruption, as ukrainian president kuchma said that he wanted a word not of ukrainian origin from... the word, but it is very well known in ukraine, and also remembering blinkin's statement before this, his last visit, we understand that here the ukrainian authorities must finally understand that this policy of emotional blackmail is working, and that it is necessary to demonstrate readiness and, in fact, the ability of ukraine to be reliable. a nato partner, well, because if we are talking about nato, in nato, in those allies who supply us with weapons, they had the biggest problem, it was the efficient use

of funds for these weapons, i don't want to talk about embezzlement, let's say, the efficient use of funds, and one of the requirements was an audit of how our ministry of defense, how efficiently it uses these funds, an audit should have been carried out, but the head of the audit, again, who... was elected, appointed, not elected, it is important to note, but was appointed by the banking street, a few days after the open appeal of the ambassadors of the big seven, not to appoint, but to do fair competition and who, according to informed sources, just has one such important feature in her biography, or ribbon in her biography, that she is in close relations with the ... the president's family and and and she was appointed, and now she states that the audit chamber cannot and will not audit, so it is clear that such

things are simply unacceptable, imagine that you are biden and you understand perfectly well what is going on here, and even though our audit chamber did not work, i sure that the american ones intelligence and intelligence of other countries of the world know for sure what is happening in the situation, my acquaintances say that... the ministry of defense is left with the same bellies, colonels or generals, who sit on streams, and the change of the minister of defense has had little effect, the schemes are practically preserved , and when all this is known, and when our president was called so many times to remove the interference of his own office in the executive power, there are still no independent courts, because there is tatarov, some deputies were fired there, but they are not those deputies. which they would like to release and civil society and the west, in a word, when you set the bar so high,

demanding that your allies fulfill their obligations, you must remember about yourself and the fact that with such tatars, with such, with such a ministry of defense , with such purchases, with such accounting chambers, we will not win the war either, when we do serious... to delay aid to western partners there to the united states to to other countries, it is very important to remember, not to forget and to pay attention on the fact that the construction the power that we have does not help us to successfully conduct hostilities at all. mr. oleg, look, well, then this means that we will walk in a certain vicious circle, so we will not carry out certain personnel reshuffles, personnel decisions and implement them. those approaches that we would like to see in the white house, on the other hand, the americans will also look at it and say: oh, oh, this will all be again, again, again twisting the situation into the format of a circle, along which

we will... walk , the war continues, despite certain optimistic signals, well, i wanted to would have a very specific definition, because certain security agreements have been signed, the washington summit is approaching, at which a palliative decision will most likely be adopted, and we understand that after the swiss summit there will be another chinese-brazilian-russian summit, well, i would i would add here, after all, in june we are expecting, i think still. the beginning of negotiations on the acquisition of membership in the european union, all these things that we are talking about, this is not only the position of the americans, it is, in principle , the position of the european union as well. independent court - this is a requirement of the european union and an obligation of the ukrainian authorities. effective governance is the same thing. that is, we will now open, if we start negotiations on the acquisition of membership, then we will have very clear tasks before us and with very... strict

monitoring, and it has all merged into one, so it will not be possible to separate the americans separately here the european union will not succeed on this formula, but on this team of the president with five or six advisers, it will not be possible to enter the european union, but to move it from its place, and therefore it will be necessary to change, our government wants it, doesn't want it, our president likes it. yermak is infinitely liked, and yermak is infinitely liked by the tatars, it is clear that we want to have support, a completely logical and justified demand from the european union and the west for certain changes and reforms in governance, and therefore the west will not give more than the minimum necessary money for a country that no, he does not know how and does not want to govern properly, i am not saying that

he will not give at all... because it is clear that now the west has calculated and has come to the logical conclusion that it should support ukraine now it is better, cheaper and more effective from the point of view of the interests of the same europe than to give russia the opportunity to go to the border with the european union, and here we have a common interest with the european union, but at the same time, if you look very pragmatically at what is happening in ukraine, it becomes clear that with such... leadership, with such management, with such governance, with such, with the lack of distribution of branches of power and the dependence, in fact, of all branches of power, on a few people on bankova street, we will not get far , so the question here is that we are not we can, and this is understandable, zelenskyi said about this that we cannot win this war without the west, and the west perfectly understands that aid

can be ineffective, that fundamental changes will not take place in ukraine, so these changes cannot be avoided if we talk about the complex changes that should be, yes, well, let's now detail what we would specifically expect, for example, in the united states and the european union, yes, because, well, for most of our fellow citizens with you, it all remains a mystery, and certain things are evaluated purely through the prism of emotionality, i.e. that said that, the reaction was, well, but people, well, sociology shows that people are not exactly pleasure. by the processes that are going on inside the country, and we understand that the war is a key story, but there is also the economy, there is still energy and it went, went, well, and people began to understand that power cannot be concentrated in the hands of the president there only , that the number of ukrainians who think so has fallen several times, more and more ukrainians believe that the parliament should have significantly more powers.