to play according to the notes, and how will it be played out, the peace summit of switzerland will end, they will pass, well, in principle, a decision that will not be effective, however, well, the decision will be rather politically declarative, that is, it will record that there are similar positions there the desire to move forward, that is, in my opinion, the outcome of this summit is the summit itself, and not a... it seems to me that it is much more important than the decisions that can be made there. and then, what will happen next? saudi arabia will try to hold its own conference, whether the west will discuss it with her is usually the west. saudi arabia will be given, i emphasize the verb will be given. to hold this

conference, if the europeans agree to it, if the chinese agree, and if the americans do not object in principle, then russia will already be rammed, and russia - why is it, and russia, in my opinion, in today's logic, is ready to wage war in the future , but understands that it is not in her interests, well , look at what is happening to the economy, look... how it is depleted, look how it is being cut off, and the americans are not just like that, now, and the europeans are helping them, they have come, the reddest red lines, in my opinion, to hit with american weapons, even with restrictions, with the consent there, not according to the kremlin, yes, well, everything is actually more complicated there, but in my opinion, biden deliberately i threw this phrase so as not to get nervous later, that's where it started... such signs of hysteria, you

see that putin, well, first of all he says, here we can change the nuclear doctrine there, we will think about changing it, then training, but he said one thing that a lot of people didn't notice, but it means a lot, he said if the exchange starts nuclear strikes between russia and europe, then the americans will not come to your aid, that is , he questioned article five, earlier ... in the form that he did at the st. petersburg forum, he never did it, he tried it to sweat there, to bypass, that is, all these decisions, well, assets, which we all hope will be adopted next week, they actually already go against what i call the critical interests of today's russian regime, and this is a completely conscious logic, since the americans have become secondary with sanctions to knock out... the ways of circumventing sanctions,

but earlier sanctions were introduced, they were monitored there, and there were thousands of ways of circumvention, and now they gradually began to be closed, they began to be closed through dubai, they began to be closed through the turks, well, how was it in the first quarter, i there are no statistics for the second quarter, but their trade there fell by 30%, but only immediately, and the chinese are already watching, but the chinese do not have trade there, there are settlements through chinese banks. that is, in fact, the states and europeans have more to screw up the valve opportunities, well, not for nothing, the chinese leader was in paris and had, as far as i understand, a good conversation according to the chinese estimates, 900 plus billions are chinese exports to europe, and the entire chinese economic drive depends on what, on the fact that the whole their green economy... works from a panel

to an electric car, if the europeans even raise something there by a couple of extra percent, then it is, as they say, a sickle in the balls for the chinese, and the americans are now introducing, as you saw , 100%, it is actually a prohibitive tariff in chinese electric cars, and that means that for the chinese , it's a european export - it's a cool story, so any agreements about the conference, whether it will be in... in saudi arabia or not in saudi arabia, i've already heard there, what idiotic assumptions , starting from saudi arabia, any geography, but it depends on how much the states, europe and china will be ready to move to the next steps in general, everyone understands very well, first you need to understand what is from europe, what we are talking about already talked to you, and secondly, everyone still looks at washington.

that is, of course, this will delay all logic, because it depends on what will happen in washington, well , that is, purely on gestures, on what will happen now in brussels, and that's how it depends, and on what will happen in washington, that's right , that is, it can in any case be postponed the presidential elections in the united states or not, or vice versa, this, i believe, it can also accelerate, and macron did not leave his talks there about the olympic truce and so on , he can try to play this story with the chinese, under this to hold an event, but this does not mean that the process will gain momentum. i believe that in today's reality, well, this is my assessment, if you will, my intuition, any process of serious conversation between geopolitical players, it does not mean that we will follow their logic, but their logic will work, in my opinion, at the beginning

of 25 year, not earlier, well, what i feel there from my communication, both with the west and not with the west, and we with... of course, we need to prepare for this, since the dynamics may change, but the saudis are very would like to hold the next event here you are right. if you say that they can influence russia, it means that on the other hand they will influence ukraine, because any such conference is unlikely to end as the majority of ukrainians wanted, right? and it, i think, will not end with some critical and even breakthrough decisions, since even... that they will try to convince us that russia should participate there, albeit in a limited format, at the first conferences, i think, it will be about rather about humanitarian issues, hardly anyone will go further, and hardly anyone

will go further to the american elections, this does not mean that this process is emotionally so acceptable, comfortable for us. and so on, it will be very, very difficult, but it also does not mean that there will be a start of some political process, well, any process, and what is a political process, a ceasefire, is it a humanitarian or a political process? a cease -fire can be both, that is, if it is a cease-fire, if a truce is clearly a political process, that is, a cease-fire it may be a political process, a ceasefire is another thing, right? well, a ceasefire could be something for a day. in two for some purposes, for some conversations, so on, so on, so on, to exchange prisoners there, to establish some additional corridors there, anything, but a truce is clearly a political process, since a truce i have a more or less

stable character, when you talk about a truce, you, you, you are in a political thread by definition, that is, in an international humanitarian. law and international law, of course, are there its nuances, but a ceasefire can be a purely humanitarian story, a truce purely political. well, then explain to me, if the question of a cease-fire arises, how ready will both moscow and kyiv be to talk about it from a political point of view? probably, definitely, probably, and here and there, that's why i say that the next event... whatever it 's called, there's a conference or something else, whether it's going to be in saudi arabia, or it's unlikely to come to political issues, but some a humanitarian track may arise there, and i i also do not rule out that we will not be pressured, but, let's say, to convince that

the time has come for a humanitarian track, we need to talk at least about humanitarian issues, and i do not rule out that the europeans will somehow... join in on this, well but nevertheless, if macron says about the olympic games there, well, it is rather a ceasefire, since even in ancient greece no one held back for more than a couple of weeks, this is the story, we also know, so we must be ready for different development options the situation and this year, but even more so the 25th, and today we cannot... clearly write down all the factors that will affect it, of course, we can play on our fingers there, but in the 25th year there are too many unknowns to clearly now write there: either we go there, or we go here.

don't you think that the american administration would like to end the conflict in ukraine, the conflict in the middle east even before the elections? conflict over gas 100% because it affects the choice. prospect concerning our war with russia is a subject which present political in washington, this is a topic that is present. emotional for many americans, but according to the polls i have seen, this topic does not affect the motivation of americans to vote, and in general, i see only two foreign policy topics today that can change the electoral preferences of americans, and i believe that these are china today and gas, although even they will not... will not be the first, or the second, or the third, if you look at the latest polls, these are the ones that

my american friends are showing me, this is the economy, the mexican border and the issue of abortion, these are actually three issues that will determine the election, which will largely determine the election and with a high probability will determine the election here in the swing states swinstates, that is, right now these three issues, it is what i think 90 + motivations of americans, this does not mean that it will be like this in six months, since the international situation can change, but i do not rule out that at some point the administration, let's say, some kind of pause will have a good effect on our electoral prospects, but for now i do not i don't see, so far i see, on the contrary, an understanding that let's raise the stakes, let's say that the russian regime... cannot advance, let's make it so that it does not advance further, and i understand what is

behind this also agreements between key figures of democrats and republicans, so there are significant differences on israel, on gas, but on ukraine, i, well, we like to talk about bipartisan consensus, maybe consensus. no, you saw what happened with help, to say the least, there, but on the other side mike johnson said that it is necessary to hit russia with american weapons, 100%, but the general understanding is shared between democrats and republicans, i believe that there is, well, with the exception of certain weirdos who are already completely on the flanks, so here i do not see in the states some desire to lower rates for today, on the contrary to me... it seems that the americans are ready to raise rates from russia and believe that this will have a correct

effect on geopolitics, and on the projection on china and so on, that is, such readiness, it is like i have it, that is, it can be done the conclusion that this is why president biden said there that he allows american weapons to be used on the territory of russia, he met with volodymyr zelenskyi in france, he will meet with him in italy, but at the same time he can allow it. i won’t take part in the female peace, but i understand his motives, not that i support them, well, listen, during such a company, when everything is 50/50, to be absent for two weeks in the states, that’s it a story, and biden now has to work 14 hours, not an easy story, now there a lot of different speculations there around his age and so on, he needs to be present, he needs to be... media, so i think there's communication normandy, paris, italy, i think

the strategy for six months there will be determined. thank you. pavlo klimkin, diplomat, former minister of foreign affairs of ukraine was on our air. greetings aleyka. we welcome you to the joint broadcast of the first crimean tatar tv channel atp and espresso tv channel, i gulsom khalilova and my colleague andriy yanitsky work for you in the studio. hello, congratulations, congratulations, and how we always encourage you to report to the armed forces of ukraine, in particular to the 48th mbsh named after noman cherebidzhan, which set the goal of liberating crimea, if you see qr codes today during the program on your screen. immediately go and donate, transfer the funds, they are very necessary, and if you

watch us on youtube, then subscribe, ring the bell, comment on this broadcast, we will come in the comments after the broadcast and answer questions about the essence of the program, well , today we as always traditionally we will talk about what happened during this week on the territory of the temporarily occupied peninsula. we will talk about the results of this week in crimea, and of course, the first part of our program, it is devoted to the military aspect, specifically in the interim. crimea, everything that happened and all operations carried out by the armed forces of ukraine, gurmo of ukraine in the occupied crimea. pavlo lakiychuk, head of security programs of the strategy 21 center for global studies, captain of the first rank of the reserve of the naval forces of ukraine. contact us. mr. pavle, congratulations. greetings aleyka. salaam. good day. glory to ukraine.

glory. let's start with fresh news. two russian radar stations were damaged. as a result of a night attack on the occupied crimea, drones hit a military unit in the village of mysove in the leninsky district, the astra telegram channel reports. mr. pavle, what does this mean, why exactly these targets, why was it so important to damage the radar stations? well, this is evidence that the airspace of crimea is being cleaned. for subsidiary strikes on the enemy's important military facilities on the crimean peninsula, this is one thing and that's the main thing, well, remember how corridors were created for our missiles and our aerial drones for strikes on sevastopol, on objects in the sevastopol district, in

dzhankoya, the same is now being carried out in the depths of crimea, well, i would not like to ... engage in predictions there, but the statements of the representatives are delicious, for example, about the preparation for the destruction of the kerch bridge, the crimean bridge, that are completely embedded in this paradigm. well, that is, now we see such a systematic destruction of russian air defense and radar systems, right, i would to add, if we see on the map... and our viewers saw on the map where this cape is located, that is, it is already the sea of ​​azov, it is not the western part of crimea, it is already the eastern part of crimea, close to kerch, and in fact, well this is the territory that is inside the occupied territory, that is, in order to hit these radar stations with naval

drones, it was necessary to pass the kerch strait with this naval drone, or launch them in some way from... from the occupied territory, this is an extremely difficult operation, mr. pavle, and we we see these systematic defeats, and now in the sea of ​​azov, does this mean that we can also attack targets directly on the territory of the russian federation, in fact, why not, we do it regularly, cotton is making noise not only there in the belgorod region, in bashka. near the urals, but also rostov and krasnodar, and tupse, taman, uh, are marked by such beautiful, i would say, fireworks and bonfires, which also testify to the fact that the russian occupiers in

the crimea will not receive fuel and lubricants in the near future, so that their ammunition warehouses are also being emptied such an unconventional way, so the enemy's logistics is destroyed, not only the crimean bridge burning, this is the key to securing the enemy's occupation group in the crimea, this is also the kerch ferry crossing, this is the ships, amphibious ships and transport vessels of the black sea fleet, which... the enemy is trying supply ammunition, fuel, etc. to the occupied crimea, there is a whole complex of objects that, uh, that simply need to be neutralized, well, this is already such a safari for the player , yes, and yesterday, mr. pavle, it became known that the gurmo of ukraine destroyed the russian

tugboat in lake pangolyu, crimean tatar. yes, gentlemen, what is more interesting here is not that the tugboat was destroyed, because it is quite ordinary, but that the ukrainian naval drones have already overcome these russian ban barriers, which we understand are still in novorossian ports and other ports, where does russia hide its ships, does this mean that senun, that is, these ban barriers of russia no longer work, and our naval drones can... get any russian ships in the ports of akyaru or the ports of novorossiysk? well, not quite. bon barriers are such own nets. which are placed above the surface of the water on such buoys and which prevent surface targets from moving into one or another

water area, if you look around sevastopol, for example, there is not only the entrance to the sevastopol bay, but there are also several in the southern bay, in several rows of buoys barriers are also on the northern side. that the enemy considers, well, traditionally, such a defense system is the most optimal, well, in a complex with anti-sabotage measures, boats, helicopters patrolling the sea, our guys tried to break through these barriers barriers, and they really broke through, and to say that 100% success is not so good. well , first of all, in order to break through, well, it’s like a cumulative strike, someone has to, one drone has to break through, sacrifice itself to break through these barriers, the second one and the others break

into the closed water area, nevertheless in the sevastopol bay, remember her regular raids in relation to which had their result, er, the enemy is trying to improve this system, well, for example, in that... notorious crimean bridge , barricades have already been set up or something to name, that is, instead of these buoys, there are whole old rusty barges that have to be passed through, well, you can hit such an iron, of course, but how long will it sink, and it is obvious that such... a method of protection can , well, from the point of view of reliability, maybe it’s better, but you’re taking it too hard somewhere, well, actually, let them collect, we

will destroy everything in a row in different ways, the enemy invents new ways of defense, we invent new ways of defeating and bypassing him, we tried they are helicopters there on crossing the sea to use for... destroying our drones, they started putting anti-aircraft missiles on the drones, we put anti-aircraft missile systems if necessary for remote damage to the shore, so we are developing, we will definitely achieve our goal, well, it is really interesting, regarding the russian system of jamming our sea drones last week they 32 times, this was an unprecedented case when they were lifted into the sky. aviation to destroy our sea drones, and on the other hand we understand that group 13, they always modify our sea babies and so on, but still, how

it seems to you that the russians have already invented such a system and countermeasures against our naval drones, or not yet, until they understand how to counter it, well, they are always inventing, and this is natural when a new tool appears. defeats are looking for ways to counter it, mainly with what they do, it’s uh, it’s such a pretty classic old one, we remember net barriers, boom barriers, search and destroy by patrolling the entire sea, that is, this is such a traditional anti-sabotage, anti-sabotage defense, but our drone operators. .. and not only drone operators observe new ways of protecting the enemy and find tactical techniques to bypass them, uh, find ways

to break through such enemy defenses, we have already given several examples, and there is not only that, it is radio electronic warfare and the complex use of air and sea drones , so for now in this competition, as the sailors... call fire and armor, our fire is winning, and it is obvious that the russians are, well, if this is not panic, then i don't know what, actually , instead of to perform tasks as intended, one single task which remains with the black sea fleet of russia, this is to preserve itself. well, if we already neutralize the tugboats, then soon there won't be any left at all. there are no means, only passenger ones in the occupied in the occupied crimea, but i would like to say about the article that appeared in...

the authoritative british edition of the economist, which actually says that ukraine is making crimea such a trap for russian troops and for russians , with the same strikes that are now destroying and blocking the crossings across the kerch strait, and with future strikes, we are sure along the kerch bridge, and crimea will turn into... just a territory where a lot of enemy forces and enemy assets are concentrated, why is this being done, what can ukraine then do with it, start some negotiations at this stage so that they leave without weapons from the peninsula, for example, or simply neutralize this channel of supply of weapons and power to the eastern front, how do you see this picture, why? we

are turning crimea into a pasture for the russians, but they turned it themselves, actually, soviet-russian officers are there, but not only pro-russian, let's say, the legend was that whoever owns the sevastopol crimea and sevastopol dominates the black sea, well, it is possible, it was real there somewhere in the 17th, maximum 18th... century, when there were sailing ships , gusts of wind, etc., and for our time, when the black sea, even at such speeds and distances, it became a basin, small, it no longer works, and crimea remained only a threat for a possible fight against ukraine, that is, in the 14th year, before the 14-year-old

himself... we said that if russia climbs up to us to crimea, then actually this is the first stage of the conquest of ukraine, but crimea has a weakness, even two. these are isthmuses. this, this island, in fact, is connected to the mainland by two, uh, two such necks, uh, it's a big ditch, which, if you plug a cork there, then , strictly speaking, it becomes a closed vessel, well, on the other side they now there is another crossing, this is the kerch transport crossing, the same, the crimean bridge, the same port-crimea-port kavkaz crossing, if you also cut the logistics to ee to kerch. strait, then

, strictly speaking, crimea becomes a suitcase without a handle, on the contrary, it not only helps er in attacks on the mainland, it only burdens er, its owner, it is because of this that the russians, already realizing that such an ass is sneaking up on them, are trying to lay a railway right in the combat zone. .. the south of ukraine, so the ukrainian military chose the most optimal way, it is actually such an operation to prepare the combat space, a planning operation, as it is called in our partners' armed forces, to isolate the crimean peninsula, what will happen to it, to the enemy garrison? enemy group in

crimea, i don’t know, i don’t really care, well, as history shows, there they have chersonese, i mean not, the ancient greek place chersonese, but the city of chersonese, and we are from khersonets in sevastopol, huh , where those fleeing from the crimea usually huddle, that’s uavelkom, well, that’s a different matter actually... well, those who came to the crimea with the invaders, i would advise you to use the crimean bridge, return home in varkutu and naryanmar, so as not to end up in such a trap. well, when we talk about the deoccupation of crimea, and about the operation regarding its deoccupation, a lot of experts and even a leader.