this is for putin, as i understand it, this book, the fact is that when putin is afraid of something, he is afraid of our nuclear status, well, everything he demands, it means that he is afraid of it, and here it is already possible to predict that he, when he starts healing, that's it, he's not doing very well, things are going well, and he's not very sure that everything will turn out the way they planned, uh, that is, when he feels that... it will turn out like this, as they all wanted, because the intimidation begins, because we have to do, well, i'm sure that we have to immediately washington, for there to be some kind of decision regarding our movement in nato, well, it is written in our constitution, we cannot change it, and i am sure that the nuclear-free status must be canceled, the nuclear status must be restored, i think that we we will be able to agree with our partners, if it is not ours.

domestic nuclear weapons, at least as in germany, as in turkey, let it be that it is not american, because it is sometimes difficult to agree with them, well, it is a big country, there are many different opinions, and with the british, i think, there are no issues, we, if we, according to international law, if we give the go-ahead, and we have certain agreements, military agreements, military alliances, in various formats with some country, and it wants to... keep nuclear weapons on our territory, and we do not against, then this is not a violation of any international laws, well, for example, how the russians can legally keep their nuclear missiles in belarus, the same way, and this, well, it does not violate anything, we may not like it, but this does not violate the law, we can also keep well british or french nuclear missiles on our territory, or to renew our nuclear status, i think that this would be exactly what we need, and to exchange the so-called measure for the return

of regions, well, what a fright we have to give up our regions, let's come up with counter-proposals, let's create a demilitarized zone and create a separate kursk republic there, what the hell is there, oh , bryansk, belgorod, well, the word stuck, well , you can, well, i'm joking, of course, i'm not joking, you can do something like that, such a shahini to offer an answer, you know when a person says stupid, an outright fool, and we begin to seriously react and respond to him, and he tries, we try to prove that it is not necessary to do so, he is not going to, he was not going to insist on this, and he needed the overton window so that a conversation began about this, that there is some kind of... reaction to their complete nonsense, and then they

can, well, in russian, well, let's not give four oblasts, we'll go to meet you, don't give three oblasts, so we have to with such people, with such statements, it is very easy to answer, or to remain silent and say that we are we don't comment on stupid things, or some stupid thing like that, so that their brains turn around, let's, well, for example, let's give us the kursk region, like in that movie, and kursk there, well, give it to us, that's what we decided. and why not, and accept it, please hand over the nuclear weapons, i don’t know to whom, well , burundi, we are making such demands on you, hand over all the nuclear weapons to burundi, well , tania, they say the same nonsense, how scared are you you tell us what alliances we should join, what we should do, from which fear, we have to fight with you for victory, agree to give you some of our territories, well, what is it? and we

react to it, there is no need to react to it, it is either to say that we do not respond to stupidity, or to launch the same stupidity in response. thank you, thank you, mr. major, for the conversation, it was oleksiy hetman, a military analyst, a reserve major of the national guard of ukraine, a veteran of the russian-ukrainian war. friends, we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on ours platforms on youtube and facebook. for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms, please subscribe to our pages. on these platforms, and also take part in our survey, today we ask you about whether the victory of ukraine is possible without the capitulation of putin, yes, no, two options for answers, if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote , if you believe that the victory over putin, or the victory of ukraine is possible without the capitulation of putin, 0.800, 211, 381 that this victory is impossible without surrender. on 0800

211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote, at once several large forums, world meetings took place this week in europe, a large forum on the restoration of ukraine was held in germany, it started yesterday, and the meeting of the big seven ended today, the big seven decided to give ukraine 50 billion dollars at the expense of russian assets, prime minister, prime minister. italy's giorgia meloni said that the leaders of the g7 reached an agreement to provide ukraine with this amount, and now it is all at the expense of frozen russian assets. let's hear what georgia maloney had to say. i can confirm that we

have reached a political agreement to provide additional financial support to ukraine in the amount of about 50 billion dollars by the end of the year, through the credit mechanism. for the repayment of which surplus profits from russian assets, which are frozen in our jurisdictions, can be used. we are not talking about the confiscation of these assets, but about the interest that accrue over time. it's a pity that so far they are only talking about interest accrued on assets, russian assets frozen in europe, because the russians have already started to panic, because they say that they will reciprocally... confiscate the assets of western companies located in the russian federation , well in the meantime, the g7 made another statement that russia should pay 486 billion dollars in damages caused to ukraine, and this is also a pretty

serious statement, we see how our western partners are starting to get tougher deal with putin. and with his cronies, because only numbers, only money, only opportunities, and the limitation of these opportunities can affect the one who sits in the kremlin, the one who starts talking again that he is not against peace talks, but on his terms, what peace talks mean in putin's mind is... the mandatory capitulation of ukraine, because what the master of the kremlin is proposing means that ukraine must voluntarily give up four of its regions, plus the autonomous republic of crimea, i.e. kherson, zaporizhzhia, donetsk, luhansk oblast, the autonomous republic of crimea,

i.e. from five oblasts, the autonomous republic of crimea has a special status, i.e. from four oblasts of the autonomous republic of crimea and from. give up the prospect of acquiring nuclear weapons, give up a large army, give up the movement towards the north atlantic alliance, that is, the proposals that putin is making now, they are unacceptable for the ukrainian state, it is clear that this week putin received many greetings from our western partners, first the united states of america, then great britain britain, then canada introduced it. another round of sanctions against russians and russian companies, mos, the moscow city stock exchange, came under sanctions, and as a result, the ruble, the russian ruble became really poor, because the russians

lined up for dollars, you see, they don't like the united states of america so much, but they had to wait in line and... exchange these apparently no one needs or, let's say, devalued russian rubles for hard currency. the ministry of finance of the united states of america reported that in as part of the expansion of sanctions, the united states of america prohibits the provision of software and it services to any person on the territory of russia, and this is stated in the statement of the head of the american ministry of finance, janet. yelen, she says that the united states of america is increasing the risk for financial institutions that deal with russia's military economy and eliminating avenues for tax evasion, as well as reducing russia's ability to benefit

from access to foreign technology, equipment, software and it services. well, of course, putin himself is trying now... to explain to russians that , as they say, the russian economy is stronger than ever, he constantly repeats that the russian economy is one of the four largest economies in the world. then of course putin traditionally lies, there is no, there is no fourth place of the russian economy in the world economy, and this is exactly what putin is constantly trying to emphasize, that we will survive, we will definitely do everything to take revenge on the west and the western countries that support ukraine, they say, this the west started a war and... everything is connected. friends, i remind you that we are working live on the espresso tv channel and conducting

a survey. once again, i urge you to vote in this poll, because your opinion is important to us. is the victory of ukraine possible without the capitulation of putin. yes no. if you're voting on a youtube channel, it's pretty simple, either yes or no. please write your opinion in the comments under this video. if you watch us on tv, take it. or phone and vote on the relevant numbers 0800 211 381 if you think it is possible ukraine's victory without putin's capitulation and 0.800 211 382 if this victory is not possible without putin's capitulation. next, we will be in touch with volodymyr tsybulko, political analyst, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations, glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. let's start our conversation with the next so-called peace initiatives of vladimir putin, today he

once again announced an ultimatum to the world and ukraine, and he said that he is supposedly ready for peace talks, but of course on our own terms, let's listen to what he said. these conditions are very simple, ukrainian troops must be completely withdrawn from donetsk and luhansk. as soon as kyiv declares that it is ready for such a decision and begins the real withdrawal of troops from these regions, as well as officially announces the rejection of plans to join

nato , and from our side immediately the ultimatum, which was in the 21st year, when putin demanded to prevent the expansion of nato to the east and to place the ukrainian state under his patronage, well the novel here is that he already pretends that the world agrees with this theft, grand theft or. three regions of ukraine plus the autonomous republic of crimea and enshrining it in some international legal act. what do you think about what putin did today and why he did it? well, the most interesting thing is that he appeals to kyiv, he does not appeal to the democratic world, to the sponsors of ukrainian security, he emphasizes that kyiv must recognize, this is the first, in general. if we talk about certain symbols, about body language, about colors, the purple color is the color

of lies, it is worth paying attention to the color of putinska's tie, it is unexpectedly purple, he has never been distinguished by a craving for such a color, so you can say that he is just playing a scene for internal use here, because it is clear... after the real us sanctions, in particular against the russian banking system, putin perfectly understands that his economy will be put on his shoulders in a couple of months, but it is very important for him to create the illusion of success and, well, i would say offensiveness, because he emphasizes on because accept what i have stolen, for i will steal more. and i will press, but this is being said just on the eve of a fairly significant

rearmament of the ukrainian troops and the acquisition of e-e aviation, and even as of today, this aggression of his on the kharkiv region, it was not just repulsed, it cost russia a lot of nerves, and such an impression that putin was preparing just somewhere there, well, to announce... in connection with the victory in kharkiv oblast, this, well, a similar address, but it looks like nothing in kharkiv oblast was lost on him, and now there is about... a problem with supply of water to crimea, there is a problem in general with the economy, with weapons, and most importantly, in my opinion, panic has begun in russian society about this war, and the partisan movement on the territory of russia is growing, with this, this should also be recorded, it is quite significant

is growing, and zelensky has already responded to this proposal, the so-called proposal... about dictator putin's peace talks, let's listen to what the ukrainian president said. what can i say, these messages are ultimatums, they are no different from other ultimatums he has made before. now we we see that what he is doing is the revival of nazism, this is a new wave of this nazism, russian nazism. he wants us to give up our occupied territories, there will be no frozen conflict. mr. volodymyr, watching all these international forums and summits that took place in the last few days, there

were a lot of them, and ukraine and the issue of ukraine's future were at the center of these forums. can we say that there have been changes in the political-diplomatic, that is, the political-diplomatic realm this week, which will obviously lead to an even greater increase in aid to ukraine and an even greater understanding by the world of what to do with putin? well, first of all, we have a certain feeling that expectations from schwei schweitz. whom the peace summit was somewhat exaggerated in ukrainian society, but according to the nature of the representation and the number of countries, it is still, i would say, well, not a 10:0 victory, but it is already a victory, this is the first, second, in fact, the attack of the current putin , it is actually connected with

much greater ukrainian successes. broadcasters for the preparation of the swiss summit than russia had hoped for, because there was a feeling that 25 countries would refuse to participate in this summit, but it turned out that the efforts of china and russia still did not pay off, and we can say that even this summit with , well, i would say not without colossal expectations. but with a very decent result, i myself was quite skeptical about the possibilities, but it turned out that the behavior of russia pushed many potential partners to such greater activity, and the most important thing is that on this all continents are represented at the forum, this is important, well, i will give short statistics, because

these statistics are already there and there are already representatives there are... lists of representatives of foreign countries that will participate in this global peace summit, and it will begin on june 15 in switzerland , therefore , 100 delegations, 57 heads of state and government, 29 foreign ministers, six countries sent their plenipotentiary representatives: india, brazil, south africa are also represented at this summit, and china will take part in the conference. won't be, azerbaijan won't be there for some reason, armenia, on the other hand, will participate in this summit, and there are already reports that volodymyr zelensky, who has been quite active in various forums this week, has arrived in switzerland, and you see a video of the arrival of the ukrainian president in switzerland, and obviously, the very fact the holding

of this global peace summit and today's hysteria. putin testifies to the fact that even before the start of this global peace summit, ukraine has already won, because informationally, this week in the western press and for the western audience, this week was ukrainian-ukraine week, because the forum on the restoration of ukraine in germany, and the big seven, and ramstein-23 and the ukraine-nato council, which took place during this week, and by the way, the talks between zelenskyi and the leadership of saudi arabia, with the principle of saudi arabia, this, too, is part of this great preparatory, period and preparatory. work for the global peace summit, i will ask you, mr. volodymyr, the absence of all 10 points of the peace formula under consideration at this constituent

conference, which will be held tomorrow, or constituent summit, is this a problem for ukraine, that, well, not all issues included in zelenskyi's peace formula will be considered, but only three, well, there is one important factor here, the fact is that... the representation of all countries that now they are already on the announced list, they are very friendly participants of the summit, i.e. due to such friendliness during the work of the summit , proposals can be made orally regarding the entire scope of zelenskyi’s initiatives, although zelenskyi himself narrowed it down to three initiatives, i.e. nuclear security, first of all, in general, uh... i have this the feeling that the banks were hoping that when there is a decision on nuclear security, russia somehow, wanting to continue the dialogue,

will still transfer zaporizhzhia to ukraine under control, but it seems to me that putin has decided to blackmail putin even more by this occupied nuclear plant, so here is the most important thing... what can be said that the representative office gives an opportunity to discuss that possible changes in the un and in the un charter and in the structure of the security council, if we pa, if in parallel with this, there will be a discussion on the sidelines the subject of changes in the un, reforms of the un and, of course, that this is not included in the block of proposals or initiatives of zelensky. but i believe that an additional result of the summit would be, let's say, the declaration of the readiness of most countries, members

of the united nations organization, for a serious reform of the un, because the un is not you today, it is not fulfilling its main role, and it is interesting, gutierrez should have been at this forum, but where is he, he refused to... well , this is the most interesting thing, it's good that saudi arabia sent quite, well, quite an authoritative representative of the royal family, and i think this is enough, even if not at the level of the first person, it is quite enough, that is, in any case, it can be said that this is a continuation of the previous experience. joseph biden, who once convened a democracy forum in the 21st year, then the majority of the participants of the democracy forum, well, the entire list

of the democracy forum, then voted for a resolution in favor of ukraine at the un. so, with the next democracy forum, which took place already in the 23rd year in march, the initiators still tried to bring to a common resolutions and... there was a problem, because somewhere out of 120, in my opinion, six countries, 50 countries refused to sign the joint resolution, that is, there may be an intrigue on the joint resolution of the peace summit, but i believe that in any case the framework is such communication and, well, a set of tangential interests of each of the participants. of this summit, gives perspective, firstly, to hold the next stage of such a peace summit more effectively, the most important

thing is also to reach the reform of the un and councils without the un and the creation of a un peacekeeping corps, that is, well we recall that when some people compare the ukrainian war with korea, i want to remind you that it was the international contingent that defended korea at that time, and yet... the event that took place this week and which is of great importance, well , at least president zelenskyy himself calls this event historic , this is the signing of a security agreement with the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, and what the president of ukraine himself says about this agreement, which he signed yesterday with the president of the united states of america. and that. the strongest agreement with america for all 33 years of our independence, is legally binding part of the agreement, there are

absolutely useful details. on air defense, on planes, we recorded that america will help ukraine in supplying squadrons, fighter jets, as many fighter jets as ukraine needs. what is important is that the agreement with america now stipulates that ukraine will be supported both during wartime and during peacetime. true, mr. volodymyr, some western experts say that this agreement, they say, if it is not ratified... it is in the congress, the next president, well, for example, trump, he can simply cancel it, but, well, hardly whether president trump or whoever will be the next, whoever will be the successor, who will be the successor, biden, will take such a risk and so cut off the shoulder in order to abandon this security agreement, because this is also part of the domestic policy of the united states of america, as well as

external? mr. serhiu. now the convention of the republican party is being planned, because when we mentioned trump, petro poroshenko was invited to the convention, and for more than a month the chairman of the verkhovna rada has not signed off on this trip for him, so how will we then be friends with the republicans so that did not revise this agreement? in fact, we have ratified agreements between states, this agreement is not ratified, but there is the experience of france. for example, president macron submitted the same agreement to the parliament, so that the parliament would approve such an agreement at the level of a resolution, so it is obvious that this ukrainian-american agreement is very often called an analogue of the american-israeli security agreement, which essentially began with declarative of the same ee... norms, but

from the declarative form, but i would say that this is rather a conceptual agreement, this is an agreement on strengthening of trust, and here, when it is done publicly in front of the whole world, they do not back down from their word in the principle of democracy, let's remember how much noise there was about the budapest memorandum, and those who are in a hurry to call... this agreement the budapest memorandum, indeed, well, it was not ratified in the parliament, but even the budapest memorandum, being unratified, encouraged ukraine's partners, in particular great britain and the usa, at the time of russia's attack on ukraine, to stand by ukraine, that is, in a democracy, when

public promises are made. it's just not easy for them to renege on public promises, because it destroys trust, and democracies are precisely coexistence based on trust, so that's how democracy differs from an autocracy, where everyone suspects everyone. biden announced at a joint press conference with zelensky that the united states of america will not send troops to ukraine, but will help with the provision of weapons and... economic support. let's listen to what the president of the united states said states of america. our goal is to strengthen ukraine's defense capabilities in the long term. ukraine will have the ability to defend itself now and deter any aggression in the future. the united states will help ukraine do both. we will not send american troops to fight in ukraine, but we will provide all necessary weapons

and ammunition. we will also provide are dedicated and will continue to train brave ukrainian soldiers at bases in europe and the united states. we will invest in the defense and industrial base of ukraine, as well as we will support economic recovery. in addition, biden said that the white house is preparing a victory plan for the congress of the united states of america, in accordance with the previously adopted law on aid to ukraine for 60 billion. dollars, mr. volodymyr, do these statements and this agreement mean that the united states of america is making it clear to putin that there will never be a russian victory over ukraine, because the americans, the british, the canadians have enough tools besides the military , economic instruments that...