occupiers on our ukrainian land, both military and civilian. let's observe a moment of silence in memory of the ukrainian military and civilian citizens of ukraine who died in the war started by russia.

about two hundred russian soldiers were surrounded at the vovchansk aggregate plant after trying to force the vovcha river, military observers and telegram public write about this , is it true, and also about what the peace summit brought to ukraine, this is svoboda ranok, me my name is oleg. and we will talk about these topics today in our broadcast, share this video with your friends, share this video with your friends, and write in the comments where you are watching us from, it is important for us to understand what the audience of svoboda ronok is. the russian military held positions in the northwestern part of the aggregate plant in vovchansk, however, it is not clear whether the situation is the same now, analysts of the american institute for the study of war write about this. according to their maintenance data. russian

forces in these positions are evidenced by geolocation shots of strikes on the plant by the armed forces of ukraine. the video appeared on the internet on june 13, it was published on the telegram channel of the unmanned aerial vehicle unit of the 57th separate motorized infantry brigade. and the other day , military observer kostiantyn mashovets said that approximately two hundred russian soldiers at the aggregate plant were surrounded after they tried to cross the vovcha river. analysts of the deepstate project report that some drgs of the russian military entered. there since the first days of fighting for the city, and on june 1, according to their data, the defense forces of ukraine took control of the approaches to of this plant. subsequently, a group of russian soldiers made three attempts to break into the plant. information about the situation there is specially provided late, project analysts say. the ukrainian general staff reports on fighting in the vovchansk region. the russian ministry of defense is talking about an alleged improvement in the position of the russian army in the city. meanwhile, the vovchan city council throughout yesterday.

reported several times about the advance of the armed forces of ukraine in vovchansk. roman pohorily, co-founder and analyst of the deeppstate project joins our broadcast. i congratulate you, mr. roman. congratulations, glory to ukraine. kudos to the heroes, thank you for joining. let's start then with the events in kharkiv oblast. actually, the aggregate plant in vovchansk. what is happening there now? russian media write that the army of the russian federation has somehow fallen into the vicinity, that is, individual military personnel who are at this plant. what are your analysts observing, is it true, and who is monitoring it? actually approaches to the enterprise, well, the situation has not changed critically since the last discussions of the description, it essentially remains as it is yes, the enemy is partially sitting on the territory of the plant, they are trying to break in there, because if you even go to our channel and watch the description of certain, a certain chronology of events, as we have already described it, the enemy is trying to enter there in small groups, to gain a foothold there,

to break through to their own, of course, the logistics remain as they have already been described, they drop water there with drones, food is bull there, our fighters just keep an eye on all the passages there to prevent the enemy from advancing, they inflict damage, and we see that there is already not only some light means of attack are actively working there, such as drops or drones or something else, but aviation with heavy aerial bombs is already working there, accordingly, the enemy is still sitting there, we hope that they will all stay there forever, and those those who will try to break through there will remain there anyway, the muscovites, of course, at first began to recognize this whole process, there are some of their sources, they tried. to be described

today, they saw that it goes into the media on a large scale, it is a reality so that they are surrounded there and sit and start inventing some heroic stories, that there is a passage there, everything is controlled, they are so good there, although there are already a lot of two hundred and three, a real number, well, honestly , even in communication with the soldiers, even they cannot say how much approximately exactly, but there is, there is, of course they follow it, they inflict damage, therefore, while this is the situation, how it will develop further, even the russian army is here she can? pull reserves to this plant in order to save those of the military, who are currently there, or strengthen their positions there, and they can do anything there, again, we have seen processes, examples of pulling groups, trying to break through there, then maybe they

will make a decision to leave there, too battle, although it is unlikely that they supposedly keep a factory there and that's all, well, it's interesting, we will talk about it with the ukrainian military, with representatives. in particular, those types of troops that are currently stationed there. let's talk about sam vovchansk with you, to what extent the situation in the city today is difficult for ukraine, and which part is controlled by the russian army, that is, how are the battles going on there now, have they calmed down, have they not calmed down, what do your analysts record? well, basically, first of all , we see that vovchensk is under active shelling, in general, the populated areas that are located there along the entire line of military confrontation that passes. there , the muscovites resort to such moves simply when there are no other options, there are no other options for advancement, they are trying to destroy everything, everything in a row, and they are now somewhere are regrouping, they are usually trying

to climb up, get a foothold somewhere, i.e. the northern part of vovchansk, we see that there is both a red and a gray zone, and active combat operations are currently taking place there, our fighters. of course, there, in the form of separate special units, they also try to use every opportunity to clear the enemy, there is a street, a house, positions, anything to prevent the enemy from getting a foothold, the muscovites, of course, who use their infantry to advance, also try to get a foothold , somewhere there to conduct some active actions, but this is within the limits of those there city, i.e. changes in... of course, there are none, and it has been quite a long time, first of all, it is thanks to our soldiers of the defense forces, if we talk about both vovchansk and liptsi, of course, any movement, if we talk about equipment, everything is very bad for the russians there, because only they

use it, our fighters smoke it, and somehow it is very difficult to use it there, and they start it there one by one, several units at a time, and of course it is not so easy to hunt. and the infantry, the infantry is one of their main such resources that move, die, they are replaced by others, artillery, drones, lancets are actively used there, unfortunately, they work very actively and harass our soldiers and dig, they dig as always, wherever they go, whatever they do, they dig, dig, dig, we also made publications, so it does not stop, that is, they continue to build fortifications? they continue, they lose equipment, they lose people, but as already mentioned, they don't care, they dig, they build, they try to get a foothold, and in one place we published photo, three units of equipment were destroyed there in

a short period of time, and they still continue to do it, so what does this show, roman, that’s also interesting, in fact, what does this show that even losing people, equipment, which i don’t know , how much is the russian federation now. but the ssu constantly reports that something was destroyed there, something was destroyed in the russian army, and they continue to lose it in exchange for a trench, that is, they plan to stay there for a long time, that they are building these trenches, or whatever this may indicate ? well, logically you can analyze that if they set up positions, they are set up there, accordingly hold positions and stay longer, the same can be said of such reserve moments, so that the infantry is fixed and... and if even they fall somewhere, that is, along that line there was a clash where, where it goes, there will be a breakthrough somewhere, they can consolidate on the positions they already have, what they are doing, well, of course there are a lot of questions, because in different areas, and this is one of

those main tactics when muscovites simply destroy their resource, they throw them, despite losses, they don't care about them, especially people. there on the equipment, and this is one of those examples, that is, they hit them there dangerously, but they perform their task, that is, 2 km, 5 km, 10. 15 and it does not matter, they, they know that this is their task, they understand for why it is needed, and of course, that later it adds difficulties, adds complications, but such is the price of war and such is the price of tasks. roman, let's move on to another section of the front. the russian ministry of defense reported the occupation of the village of zahirne, which is zaporizhzhya area, or is it, and that's what the deep state project knows? well, you can. to see that there have been no changes in that area with this settlement, of course, that we will react there to

any and all these moments, but muscovites very often come up with the idea that they allegedly took something, advanced and this needs to be checked 10 thousand times, check and prove, that is, this village is not currently occupied, well, of course not, because at least there were no updates on the map and it is necessary. to follow this, of course, that we will clarify what is there what the situation is, and we will mark it later. at the end of our conversation, i would like to ask you about the situation in silver forestry. azov says that the russian army was pushed back from there, what positions are in question and why this forestry is so important, because the ukrainian military, in particular, who remember the battles there during the last few months, say that it was a very hot spot and very dense russian artillery, for example, worked there, and this is a hot spot. this is a very difficult terrain for fighting action, wooded area, also constant

shelling, constant attempts to break through groups of muscovites, they are trying to leave from all holes there, of course, positions in the srebyan forestry were rejected, that is, it is not all forestry, there are heavy battles for each position, even this is possible i saw in those same... videos from the fighters of azov, they sometimes publish their footage of assault actions and in general combat actions, and this was one of those processes where they were able to recapture certain positions, gain a foothold there, unfortunately, there the situation is always difficult, and the enemy is conducting counter-attacks there, conducting shelling, and now it is important to hold the positions on which they have established themselves and... our fighters, there are many different units that hold

silver forestry as a whole, it is important, it is not important anymore only there in some tactical, generally informational way, because in muscovites it doesn’t work out there, no matter how much they try to push us out of the silver forestry, they can’t do it, there are such fierce battles going on there, that’s why the situation remains tense, and it i i think it will always be like that there, i thank roman for that. that you joined and analyzed the events at the front, what is happening now, what are the hottest points, roman pohorily, this is the co-founder and analyst of the deep stateua project, was a guest of our broadcast, we talked about the military situation, and to this topic during this broadcast we will be back again, well, i will just read from where the viewers of svoboda rano are watching, in the comments you name the cities, in particular, mr. oleg is watching from chernihiv, yevgeny is watching us now under the maryenko, maria is from lviv, olya is from dnipro, there on... i am from the kyiv region, there are also people from odesa, from poltava they are watching us,

someone from russia writes something that probably glorifies russia there, well, various comments in the chat, you can write your thoughts and impressions, about what you see and hear and react to it in this chat, also share this video with your friends so that as many people as possible get quality content, well, this is a good result - said the president of switzerland during a press conference on by the results of the first one. peace that passed in this country. non-signatory states declaration now, but took part, emphasized the importance of such a platform. at the same time, the head of the foreign policy department in switzerland, ignazio casi, said that the next peace summit may take place in the fall , on the eve of the presidential elections in the usa. president volodymyr zelenskyi also said that preparations for the second peace summit are already underway. however, he did not say when exactly the next meeting will take place, but he emphasized that the preparation will take not years, but months. the president's office told about further developments. ukraine's plans after the inauguration of the peace summit in switzerland, some countries are already ready for a meeting regarding the three points

of the ukrainian peace formula, which were discussed at the summit in switzerland, deputy head of the president's office ihor zhovkva wrote about this on his facebook. the next steps of conducting thematic activities on each item at the level of ministers and advisers. we already have the appropriate readiness for their organization from a number of countries, after that we will go to the second summit, which should lay the foundations for a lasting and just peace. head of the ukrainian foreign ministry dmytro kuleba noted that the next peace summit should be the final end to the war, and for that, both sides need to be at the negotiating table. switzerland to report. of russia about the results of the peace summit that took place this weekend at the bürgenstock resort. more than 80 of its participants supported the joint communique, which agreed on specific steps in the peace process and the involvement of all parties in it, this was a direct quote. the head told about the intention to discuss how the meeting ended, both with moscow and with other countries, whose doors were knocked on, but they did not come through. the swiss ministry of foreign affairs, without giving details, what exactly

the message will be conveyed. what was the highlight of the peace summit in switzerland, which was held without a chairperson. these events in russia, see the report of my colleagues. half of the world is represented on the multi-level pedestal. glory to ukraine. the protocol ceremony of the peace summit was corrected by the prime minister of canada, which has supported ukraine since the first days of the invasion. not everyone responded, but everyone who came to switzerland was united by the desire for the war to end. we managed to reach a common vision here in bürgenstock. we send a clear signal to the people of ukraine and to all those who were directly affected by the consequences of the war. much of the international community is eager to change that. among the hundreds of delegates are those who have broken off contacts with moscow, but also those

who support them. ukraine is ready to listen to all opinions and proposals, and for this reason, i myself. but relying on international law that protects its territorial integrity. the un charter is the foundation for us, and then when the plan of action is on the table, agreed upon by all and transparent to the peoples, then it will be brought to representatives of russia, so that at the second peace summit we could record the real end of the war. now we start this journey together. for the sake of significant progress on the way to peace, russia is needed at this table, said the president of kenya, top diplomats of turkey and saudi arabia, for whose favor ukraine is fighting, in particular. when the saudi prince called for difficult compromises, without specifying which ones, there was complete silence in the hall. it is important that

the international community encourages any move towards serious negotiations which will require a difficult compromise of the mission within the road map to peace. it is important to emphasize here that any reliable process will require the participation of russia. ukraine understands that it will be necessary to talk with russia, but not in the language of ultimatums - said the head of ukrainian diplomacy. kuleba said that putin's demands for ukraine to declare neutrality and withdraw from four regions, including the territories under its control, did not arouse any appetite at the summit. and he does not see a problem in the statements of the delegates from... the global south, it is not such an event, where, what loves, who loves russia, to bring everyone together and for everyone to speak, as they say, in unison with the russian federation. it is through this kind of frank dialogue that we can come to the right decisions. western partners of ukraine expectedly and consistently expressed their support for it.

the us allocates 1.5 billion dollars to restore the damaged energy infrastructure. norway 103. canada gives 15 million for the return of ukrainian children. europe and the usa criticized the kremlin's updated terms and called them unacceptable. none a responsible nation cannot say that this is a reasonable basis for peace. this is against the un charter. it goes against basic morality. this goes against basic common sense. the summit ended with a joint declaration. it contains discussion points that were on the agenda. the participants volunteered, nuclear power plants, including nuclear power plants, should work. under the control of ukraine. its agricultural products should freely reach where they are needed, and prisoners of war should be released through a full exchange. as it follows from the declaration, specific measures with involvement are being prepared all sides despite the absence of difficult, as volodymyr zelenskyi said, items of the peace formula on the agenda, the signatures of all participants of the summit under the final communique are still missing. out of a hundred delegations

, 80 countries and four international organizations supported the declaration, and... among those who did not do so, not only the countries of the global south. armenia, india, saudi arabia, the united arab emirates, and others did not join the declaration, but they have room for maneuver, they can support the communiqué later, in particular, those who were not present at the summit according to the president of switzerland, the question of how and when to include russia in the process remains key, considering that two sides are needed for a solid decision. from switzerland. zoryana stepanenko, marek hayduk. well, further on in our broadcast we will talk about the results of the peace summit, what it brought to ukraine, what it did not bring, oleksandr bevs joins our broadcast, he is an adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine. i congratulate you, alexander. good morning. thank you for joining. tell me, please, if you could sum up what happened in switzerland, how many percent out of 100 is ukraine satisfied with the results it received

after the peace summit? well, i think that kind of math is always going to be very relative, but given the expectations that were there, i think the summit is very successful. in fact, no one should have expected that this summit would be the beginning of some negotiations and so on. we have declared from the very beginning that this is not the case. this summit should be. was to give such a high-level political kick-start to develop a sustainable joint peace framework that then will be the basis of the future peace process, and it happened, and that is why we believe that the summit is a success. well, we will still talk with you about the negotiations, because there are questions about that, but iraq and jordan withdrew their signatures under the joint communique after the peace summit in switzerland, which took place over the weekend. council of switzerland, do they know alive. all of the president and whether they understand why it happened, russia put pressure on these countries, or what was the reason for the fact that they first signed this communique, then withdrew their signatures? well, for now, this information

needs confirmation anyway. today we will contact our colleagues from bern, once again discuss the entire list of countries that have joined, because yesterday i was personally present during the announcement of the results, because the accession to the communique and these countries were indicated on the final scoreboard in the hall where the plenary session was held session. therefore, we do not rush to any conclusions. as to which countries have seceded or joined, the communiqué remains open for the accession of any countries, and we expect that the number of its participants will only increase, regarding these specific countries, we will check this information and will definitely inform, there will be no closure here, that is, i understand correctly, maybe be such that this is some kind of technical error, conditionally that these countries are not simply displayed there in the list, it could be anything, but we were definitely guided by the scoreboard that was announced by the federal minister of foreign affairs of switzerland, mr. kasis, at the plenary meeting in the presence of all the leaders, these countries were there, we will check this information, of course. well, in fact, it looks like the final komenyuk was signed by those countries that are somewhat more oriented towards the united states, that

consistently and constantly support ukraine, that is, they, let’s call it, are radically opposed to the actions of the russian federation in their majority, and they have always been on the side of ukraine, instead there are saudi arabia, mexico, brazil, india, which previously did not show clarity in russian-ukrainian issues war, they did not put their signature under the document, was this expected for... the president's office, and did you set yourself the goal that the final communiques would be signed there, for example, brazil, mexico, and india , so that it would be a signal to putin that the global south is also conditionally interested in fully resolving the issue of the russian-ukrainian war on ukraine's terms, let's say. it is a very good question, in fact, was the goal for everyone to join kaminika, as it certainly was desirable, and to deny it would be absolutely wrong and incorrect. of course, the more countries that join kaminika, the better, this is the first thesis. the second thesis, it should be understood that the reasons why some countries did not join kaminike, they can be different, here you can divide the countries into several groups, because in fact there were countries that, even

before the summit began, officially informed both the swiss and the ukrainian side that they are not yet ready to join any document, regardless of its content, yes, and this is probably due to the specifics of certain political processes within these countries. some countries were directly under pressure, and the president repeatedly spoke about this, both with regard to participation in the summit and with regard to... joining some final document. we will continue to work. obviously, i am sure that some countries that were present and did not join kaminike will join later. and even those who were not there will be able to join. regarding the fact that this is exclusively, relatively speaking, such a collective event or countries that are oriented towards the united states. i think that this is not entirely true, because the 80 plus countries that joined kaminuke, it is difficult to say that all these countries are in the orbit of influence, relatively speaking, of the euro-atlantic space. moreover... we must not forget that, in addition to this kamenike, we have two more resolutions of the un general assembly and they are supported by 141 and 143 countries of the world, and it is definitely not possible to talk

about the fact that there is some kind of polarity here, but of course it would be important for us that the large g20 countries that have not joined kaminuke today join the peaceful process, and the fact that they have not joined kaminike today does not mean that they will not be members, participants in the peace process in the future, so let's not... jump ahead with conclusions on this issue, alexander, we won't jump ahead, but what i would like to understand is if there was an understanding in the president's office that everyone would not sign the final communiqué, and the parties eventually warned about it, as you say, because everyone may have different reasons why it was not included in the document other important points from the peace formula were introduced of president volodymyr zelenskyi, in particular , a lot of people are now writing about the fact, and in the comments, if you read social networks, why there was no clause about the withdrawal of russian troops , considering... that this is a call from the world community that the war should be ended there on international terms right, why wasn't this item included? for example, did someone demand from ukraine that this

item not be included, or why should it be included at all? did not make it, but please explain this point, yes, this is a good question, but it seems to me that there is a little misunderstanding here that these are kamenyaks, these kamenyaks never had a goal, to list all 10 points of the president's peace formula, but just to record them on paper, in fact, the goal was a little different, why three points were chosen and why a certain conditional was given on them specifics, because we already had some work on them, which could be finalized even before the summit took place, other points, other areas will be worked out after the summit, and they will also be reflected, so no, relatively speaking, betrayal there is none here, and what's more, we have it there have already been previous works within working groups at the level of ambassadors and national security advisers, which took place during the year, both in kyiv and in various other capitals and cities that have certain previous developments, now what will happen after the summit, this too it is very important, we will have it happening at such

a fast pace in different... countries on different continents thematic, i would call it not summits, maybe conferences, it doesn't matter what word we use, at ministerial, parliamentary, different levels, which will finalize the work in each of the directions, and it's not just three directions, just three directions, we have three clear countries that took the lead yesterday and the day before yesterday, promote the work on these directions and finalize these provisions in kamianika , but i want to emphasize once again in kaminike for the attentive reader. there are two important things, the first - two resolutions of the un general assembly, which have been reaffirmed by all participants, which contain all the provisions that correspond to the national interests of ukraine. and secondly, what is there, is there a direct reference to the fact that all the principles of the un charter, and they are directly stated there, which are respect for the territorial integrity of sovereignty and the impossibility of changing sovereignty by force to the territorial integrity of countries, they are all written in the communique, so if you read the communiqué in its entirety with references to those

documents, which are also listed there, there should be no questions, and you should not draw superficial conclusions here, the document should be read between the lines, everything is stated there. well, it's important, actually, that you communicate with the audience, explain it too, because the questions remain, in the end, which any, which before any event, well, after all, the summit was global, a huge number of countries joined, and this communiqué has weight. tell me, please, how many times this final document was rewritten, changes were made to it, before it was published, how to vote for it in the end. to put their signatures and whether there were countries that insisted on a different wording, for example, than ukraine saw it, which states that constantly and gradually support it, and you do you mean from allies or from countries that have a different position, from countries that joined the summit, that came, we can divide there into allies, maybe those who wanted to rewrite and those who did not sign there, because something was not there agreed, well, let's divide then really into these two groups, the allies definitely did not have any critical remarks, there were several points where it was necessary

to reach a compromise wording. because it may seem to someone that our allies support everything that ukraine offers to everyone once, it is not quite so, you have to convince and explain why exactly this is so, but of course this is a completely friendly and diplomatic process, and it is open, and were there countries that demanded to significantly change the communique, yes, and were there countries that demanded to remove from it even that essential part, which is so there, yes, there was such a thing, and you can name these countries, is it not definitely, definitely not, because we will be interested. in order for these countries to remain in the peace process, we continue to seek a compromise with them, but i also want the viewer to understand that perhaps we had to defend a certain position here, even at the cost of some countries not joining the stonewallers, and this is important, because diplomacy is not always about finding a compromise at any cost, all that is important for us in this communique , everything remained, there were countries that wanted it to be softer, it's true, it really is. oleksandr, preparations for

the second summit begin. peace, there is already some preliminary vision of the president's office, as we understand, from zelensky's words, about how it will look, however, there is still no understanding when this is exactly what will happen, someone names a date before the holding of, in particular, the american elections, so that it is somehow not reflected at this peace summit, please tell me, according to the understanding and calculations of the office of the president of ukraine and the organizers of this summit, russia will be invited to this second peace summit ? well, let's go with what we come up with for this date. yes, because the date has not been finalized, federal minister cassis did mention yesterday about the possibility of holding a summit before the november elections in the united states, we would still be careful to determine any specific dates, but the president clearly said yesterday that the question is certainly not about years, the question is about months, then we can plus or minus understand this range for ourselves, but in general.