well, maybe so, and the report that families of air defense servicemen received a russian order to evacuate families from crimea, which they can testify to, why families need to be taken out, are they afraid of the activity of our partisans, or is there some other story here. there can be two components here, two answers: the first is to remove, well, let's say this, the families of the military from the affected area, because the cluster, cluster combat unit is designed to affect a large area, and there is a military, military town where these families live, these anti-aircraft fighters, and they are in the risk zone, they see it, they analyze and...

whether to reduce the level of these risks, it is quite clear, and another answer may be that the enemy is preparing for the evacuation of crimea in advance and removes its civilians from there, in addition, they export spare parts from those uprs of the black sea fleet, since october last year they have been actively exporting from sevastopol to novorossian property, let's say from warehouses in sevastopol. this is also a fact, if we compare it with the latest report about the evacuation of families of anti-aircraft fighters, let's say military air defense, this shows that this is a system, this, this is one chain, one, one plan, let's say this, well, that is, it only applies to, let's say this, the military's own and their families, because it's just civilians, citizens who live in there. and in akhyar, and in kazlev, in

sakas, and so on, well, they are simply sneered at by the russian occupiers, russia and the ministry of defense of the russian federation. yes, by and large, we know how to stuff our military, others who are not elite, like air defense, how to cook them for a long time, we we see these meat assaults, attacks that continue, well, such a system, such a country, and besides, eight have been brought to crimea. it seems that the so-called so-called, well , what substitutes, are being pushed out, they want to change the ethnic composition of the peninsula in this way, then say, and now we will hold a referendum, well, what about them, they are gangs, their logic is such a loophole of the st. petersburg one , and they will definitely not evacuate, evacuate them, and they will not even warn about anything, it is for them... what will happen to them and how? well, and on

this week there was news about the defeat of russian radar systems, and if i am not mistaken, it is they that provide the ability to detect and further defeat all air targets. please tell me if this is really so and how much time we still need for the scientist to destroy all the russian radar systems located on the territory of the occupied peninsula and whether the russian occupiers now have the ability, strength, power to transport other such systems and their place? well, really provision dominance in the air, which we want to do over the peninsula, begins with the neutralization of the enemy's anti-aircraft defense, anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense against. as well as its fighter

aircraft, which can also be an element of the same air defense. most of the aviation was relocated to the caucasus, there to mozdok, and so on. and the lower missile parts with radar systems that allow them to see far and prepare something there before repelling attacks remained. so here is a complex without radar without a radar. them stations, it is not combat-capable, therefore it is expedient to destroy these complexes first of all, these are radar stations that are long-range, let's say, yes, long-range, which i can see, it works on long waves, the range up to long waves, these radar stations are shooting, those that work directly with the complexes that lead the target and give these whole instructions for... the package and radar

complexes or stations of short-range direct complexes, this is for self-defense already the stations themselves and the anti-aircraft defense complexes themselves. here are three such levels, let's say, the radars that exist, which are gradually being destroyed, and according to the classics of the genre, after that, well, it will be possible to say that in the air we also do not graze the rear, somehow, the british publication the telegraph announced a plan to liberate the peninsula based on various british military experts, and the journalist there writes that it is not necessary... in general, that the boot of a ukrainian soldier should even enter the territory of crimea, it is enough to make it inconvenient for putin and cut off the arteries of the supply of ammunition, and as if on this can be said to release him remotely, at the same time, ukrainian experts from

the information project of resistance to resistance say that, after all, a ground operation cannot be dispensed with, because in crimea it will be necessary to establish... a constitutional order, and it will still be necessary to enter the ukrainian troops to the crimea, to get away with only destroying the kerch bridge and, for example, breaking through the trench, that is not enough, what is your opinion, after all, what we should most realistically do, so far only cut off supplies to the kerch bridge, to the crimean peninsula, or still prepare for a land operation? i completely agree with the point of view of ukrainian experts, and what the british say is only the first part of our plan, i think so, and

the end is final, any victory, it will be final only when chobit or someone else says it. yes, by the way, when our scouts will be drinking coffee on the beach in yalta, we know this story, and here we see on video, by the way, how the supply goes over the kerch bridge fuel to crimea, well, apparently the russian occupiers dared to transport it, that is, they still continue to use the kerch bridge, including and well, in my opinion, fuel is a completely military, military resource, including ... for military purposes, will the kerch bridge be destroyed or not? for sure , what will happen, because this is communication, this is the logistics of the living army, this is the logistics of the black sea fleet or its remnants in the crimea, and there are many ships and

vessels left there, nevertheless, despite everything the main forces are evacuated to novorossiysk and further to the sea of ​​azov, as we know, all this must be destroyed. because the army needs a lot of diesel fuel for aviation, respectively, aviation fuel, and so on, so after the ferry crossing that we damaged recently, the kerch bridge should be the main target, which should also be hit by our management, the main intelligence management, probably already working in this direction. mr. volodymyr, you know, i am concerned about something else in this matter. mostly, when we talk about the deoccupation of the peninsula, yes, we we talk about the need to isolate the peninsula from the russian federation, and this is the destruction of the city of kerch, there from

the north, isolation and further long-range missiles, strikes on russian military facilities, well, it looks very logical and very military to many experts. he says about it, even ben hodges also wrote a huge article about it and so on, but when we talk about isolation, we understand that in this isolation together with the russian military and the occupiers, peaceful people will also find themselves, and these are citizens of ukraine, crimean tatars and so on further. do you think this poses a threat to our ukrainian population in crimea? definitely is, but i want to tell you that all my acquaintances who have some contacts there, or those who recently returned from the crimea, i have friends, i have, well, let's say this, even relatives there, who are

very far away, who they stay there, uh, mostly they say, we are ready to endure, to suffer, but if we were to be freed from this horror, from this... came to our land, well, and so on, so there is definitely a risk of meringue, but well , well, there is no war without risk, as they say, in a minute you will have to risk something in the future, but the reward for this will be liberation, it will be de-occupation, and it will be worth it, well, we see that from the black sea fleet almost there is nothing left, but russia still continues to patrol the black sea with submarines, can we do something against submarines, or maybe we already have some submarines. ai drones that can engage these watercraft?

indeed, submarines remain a priority target, because they are the only time that go on combat duty, have missiles on board that can hit the entire territory of ukraine selectively, and we never know where they will shoot from, because the main trump card of a submarine compared to a surface ship , this... concealment, they dive immediately after leaving novorossiysk, by the way, these exits to the sea turn into whole operations, they are very afraid of our remote means, and this is next to surface unmanned boats, so-called surface drones, in a wide understand, it can also be underwater drones that we have, which we have developed several types of, by the way, and one of them is the marichka. er, which strike from a submarine, that is, they also

hide, and they are probably patrolling somewhere there, or preparing for it, to intercept the enemy at the base, the enemy knows this, they also act creatively, they analyze our forces and means , what we do, what tactics we use, and accordingly prepares to fight back, but until recently it ... did not help, even the use of a wide complex of aviation means of search and reconnaissance over the black sea, well, the last example is the destruction of boats in the black sea area, the bay, vuska, tugboats, shallow, smaller boats near kircha feodosia, and so on, well, this is this auxiliary fleet, mr. volodymyr, his in fact, a lot of all these tugs and boats are small, isn’t it a waste of time to spend... on such small targets, i’ll tell you, it’s not about drones,

it’s about the fact that it’s called operational regime support, the enemy must know that we constantly waiting in the sea, we know, we intelligence is working, we are tracking all the targets and they are hiding their ships for a reason, they are even conducting ordinary elements of combat training now in the sea of ​​azov, they are hiding behind the crimean bridge on the other side. and believe that they are in danger there, well, let them believe, it is not yet evening, as they say, thank you, mr. volodymyr, volodymyr zablosky, a naval expert of defense express, was on our air, let me remind you that you are watching the beraber program together in ukrainian, this is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and of the first crimean tatar tv channel of the apr, and andriy yanitskyi and gulsum khalilova work in the studio, of course, and we also have them. i understand, a short break, and then we will continue our broadcast. don't switch. events

events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports on them, but few know what is happening. it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskiy and invited experts soberly evaluate events, analyze them, modeling our future, every saturday at 1:10 p.m., with a repeat on sunday at 10:10 a.m. studio event with anton borkovsky on espresso. hello, how are you there? it's normal, slowly. so we got nine new tanks, guess what? now turn on the video link, i 'll give you a tour. well, come, we 'll stay here for another two weeks, i'll give you a ride, and not only on a tank. yes, here near the station in grozivka. he will say that you are a student. they will let you in, yes, student, my call sign is this, right here

near the station in grohivka, i will say that you are a student, they will let you in, nine there, nine there grohivka, grohivka, here you are, student, student, today you you don't follow of information security, tomorrow. iskanders will come to visit you, the enemy hears, be on the lookout. a journalist who joined the armed forces, a political expert who became a special agent, taras berezovyts in a new project on espresso. the real front is a thorough analysis of the main events. reports, comments of leading specialists and experts. analytics from the major of the armed forces. how to understand alarming news and distinguish the truth from the hostile and

false. the real front program with taras berezovets every saturday at 9:30 p.m. on espresso. power alley. the beraber program continues on your screens. in the studio of gulsum khalilova, andriy yanitskyi. we are talking about crimea. crimean news. the second block is devoted mainly to the humanitarian aspects of the kremlin's stay on the peninsula and why it is there. is happening, we have a guest, mrs. elmira ablyalimova chi gos, an expert of the crimean institute of strategic studies, should be in touch by now. mrs. elmira, congratulations. greetings to the villages of aleko. glory to ukraine. we will talk about the khan's palace and for

those who do not know, the khan's palace is the only preserved palace complex in the world. sample of the crimean tatar palace architecture and the residence of the rulers of the crimean khanate, the geraev dynasty, so let's start with this easy news: the lego company - a world-famous toy manufacturer presented a constructor in the form of the khan's palace, and this constructor, of course, popularizes the crimean tatar culture and the history of crimea in general to the whole world i hope that children all over the world will be able to play with these toys and learn more about crimea, the crimean tatars, but we know that there are also realities, now the palace is under occupation and not in the best condition state, as far as i know, well

, very exciting news has been appearing recently, during illegal excavations, as it became known on the territory of the khan's palace. the srai discovered a previously unknown building, the foundation was discovered in the harem garden of the palace complex of the famous herays, claim russian propagandists, referring to their diggers, their so-called archaeologists, they promise to dig until they reach the layer of earth used by the owners of the khan's palace. elmira khanovna, how risky it all is, how all these actions of russian diggers are, archaeologists, they are illegal, but they... are building our palace, ugh, well, first of all, i wanted to thank you for raising such an issue, it is extremely important, especially for the crimean tatars, because you are really absolutely right, the bashchesras khan palace - this is the only monument that really confirms our

existence, ethnogenesis, statehood on the territory of crimea, so we should preserve this monument. this is our number one task, uh, as for the works that we record on the territory of the bagchesrai, khan's palace, from the point of view of international humanitarian law, they are illegal, because all these works must be, firstly, authorized by ukraine, and secondly, they must carry such a restoration function. for today. we see everything except restoration, first of all, it is very similar to repair work, reconstruction, as a result of which we lose the authenticity of the monument, unfortunately, and a vivid example of the fact that we lose this authenticity is, first of all, that the big khan's mosque, where the so-called restoration

works from the point of view of the russian authorities and the occupation authorities began back in 2016 year, they, it, unfortunately, is not open to the public today, that is, these works that they started, they led, led to certain consequences, consequences, and it is still impossible to overcome these consequences, here, and as for lego, then i also wanted to reflect a little, if possible, you know, unfortunately, in the ukrainian environment there are a lot of such stereotypical ideas that have been imposed on us since the days of... the soviet union, the russian empire and so on, and the first object , which the lego campaign did about crimea, it was like that, swallows to the nest, yes,

you remember, here, and unfortunately, unfortunately, well, the first such, their first attempt to show crimea and associate it with this particular attraction, well , it caused such indignation in society , including... i wrote many posts on this matter, that is why i spoke about the fact that i believe that crimea should be associated by ukrainians with the crimean tatar culture, with the unique crimean tatar culture, and i am very glad when the khan's palace really appeared this year, well finally , ilmira khanum, and as for the khan's palace, i still have a few. questions you said about that we are losing, unfortunately, the authenticity of the khan's palace today, and indeed, if we look at these pseudo-restoration

works of the russian occupiers, before that we saw that they removed our old tiles there, and they brought another one from spain and put it there, well, it's really just a loss of all authenticity, and this old roof tile, it was lying somewhere in the rain. and so on . will we be able to restore everything correctly, return it all, how irreversible and risky it is, well, it is difficult to answer here, because we do not have access to this object, it seems to me from that and based on what we see on... . photos or videos that we will receive from crimea, indeed certain works, they are already irreversible, it is almost impossible to restore

the object, but it is almost impossible to restore it to authenticity, for some objects of the complex, you you know that the khan's palace is the complex, which consists of several monuments, well, here, and some of them are really being worked on already. have already led to a certain partial loss of authenticity of the object, and it seems to me that even the question of including the palace in the list of world heritage of the unesco will be a big problem, because the first factor of inclusion is the authenticity and authenticity of the monument, but it seems to me that there is something... which we don't talk much about, but is also a big problem, the fact is that any monument, it is also historical material, a source of future

scientific research, and precisely by restoring not, oh, sorry, by carrying out reconstruction, not by restoring a monument, we lose certain, well , sources of knowledge that can be used as uh, a source of research, future research, because even construction and techniques of construction is also a source of knowledge about how the productive forces were developed in a certain period before the crimean khanate, we know that russia still imposes such a thesis that the crimean khanate was such an understate that it did not exist. developed economy, there were no certain attributes of statehood, yes, it was a state that lived only on begami and so on, but it was

the practice and construction technologies, they show the development of the productive forces, and are a source of certain knowledge, and losing precisely such sources, we are almost losing the future. where mythologizing studies that would give us additional knowledge, i was so, you know, amazed when they were dismantling the roof of the great khan mosque, the complex construction of the roof of the great khan mosque, without a single nail, there were built constructions that were not even understandable to... a modern engineer, because the only thing they could do, the only decision they made, was the dismantling of this very roof,

but... that is , the construction of the big roof was so complex of the khan mosque, but today we have lost this structure, we have modern, you are absolutely right, modern materials, modern technologies, modern tiles, which do not correspond to the era of construction or the technologies of that time, and i think we have even lost a little such integrity... complex, when one part of the complex is under one type of construction and materials and technologies, and the other part is under another. elmiranovna, you mentioned unesco, and we know that the khan's palace, it was included by ukraine in the previous lists for inclusion in cultural

heritage sites of world importance, but... not included finally, but unesco can somehow influence russia, to stop this mess and still force the occupier not to destroy the khan's palace, but to carry out exclusively restoration work, not repair work. and whether did we as a state address this issue to unesco? yes, we appealed, the state of ukraine did everything within its powers. in order to preserve not only this monument, but all the objects that today are under the influence of the occupation authorities, yes, the fact is that russia is not only rebuilding the bagchesarai khan palace, it is conducting illegal archaeological excavations in the occupied territories, it moves the museum of worthlessness from the territory occupied to the russian federation

and even from new... territories, transports certain museum values ​​on the territory of occupied crimea, russia appropriates cultural values ​​and objects of cultural heritage together with cultural institutions, it uses them for military purposes, to date certain facts of the use of archaeological monuments of crimea, which are in the north of the peninsula in the quality of fortifications, and of course it rebuilds certain monuments, and we recorded all these facts and forward them to the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine and the ministry of culture and information policy, as a result of such work is unesco's decision to conduct annual monitoring of the state of protection.

objects of cultural heritage, science, culture, religion, that is, in everything, throughout the mandate of unesco, but the problem is that international law, in particular in the matter of protection of objects of cultural heritage during an armed conflict, very easily prescribes the issue of responsibility, and hold russia responsible. regarding these objects, it is extremely and extremely difficult, and i think that this will be exactly such a task for ukraine in the future, ah, to become at the forefront of processes, a more careful consideration of the norms of international law regarding prosecution. alities

of people who are involved in crimes against cultural heritage. by the way, on thursday, july 5, our organization, the crimean institute of strategic studies, together with the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine, together with the ministry of culture and information policy, as well as our partners, the all-ukrainian organization of international law, are holding a conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary. of the gaza convention and the 25th anniversary of the second protocol, and the focus of this conference will be the issue of criminal liability for crimes against cultural heritage. well, unfortunately, unfortunately, it is not news that empires steal cultural values, even old empires, which seem to be civilized now, still keep a lot of cultural values ​​in their museums.