well, look, i said, in the baltic sea 30%, yes, in the black sea 12%, it’s for crude oil, these are european vessels, so we say, listen, you don’t need to tell kaz, we need to take european tankers from these routes, so , i.e. it is minus 30%, in numbers it is so. 100 tankers approximately from the baltic and approximately 20-30 every month from the black sea, take a third, this is a lot, let them look for tankers in other countries, there of course the freight price of these tankers will increase, of course, if it decreases, then it will increase, the costs will increase , so, in addition to what you said,

they receive less, they receive less only due to the fact that the path of what has become, that is, before they were transported from the baltic, from leningrad, ustluga, and other ports to the ports of the european union, it is very close , cheap and so on , now, of course, when they take oil from st. petersburg by tanker to bombay or to... shanghai, it's a month and more than a month, yes, it's more expensive, but it's not critically more expensive, and besides , we do not know, since this whole topic with contracts, it is closed in this situation, we do not know, what goodies does russia promise to the same india, and the same to china, and to other countries, they can,

uh, so, have some other agreements that seem to be irrelevant, the supply of weapons to some, benefits for others, some benefits for other directions of economic cooperation and so on, that is why we say that there are ways out, and these specific ways, you see, their cameron only slightly indicated that it should be done. we are now advancing the topic like this, if time permits, then i still have four or five minutes, mr. andriy, it is possible, ugh, that is, what should be done, first of all, well, first of all, i already said that we need to take away the tankers of the european union, there are american tankers, they transport

mineral fertilizers, vegetable oil from the port of novorossiysk there from the baltic ports, we tell them: listen, don't be ashamed of- for those two or three tankers, yes, take them off those routes. in addition, it means that what should be done, each tanker has its unique name, er, this is the registration number of amo of the international maritime organization, which is given to every ship in the world at its birth. and is no longer used after the ships ceased to exist, that is, impose sanctions on all these thousands of tankers that carry, what will it mean, the ship goes through the english channel, or through the straits, kogtegatskarak from the baltic to the north sea, in the first case it is denmark.

in the second case, it's britain and france, they all pay the european companies, the british companies the channel fee, they pay the pilotage service and all those services that are related to going through the proto, as soon as you put them on the sanctions lists, they lose the ability to these payments and... by the way, in the bosphorus, i think that our turkish neighbors, they will think a lot, and what to do with these tankers, which are included vessels, not owners, yes, but vessels, in these sanctions lists, thank you, that is, uh, and finally , the environmental maritime service of any country can stop ships in its economic zone, i.e. in...

the open sea and in the straits, and check them to see if that top, or that oil, and all that stuff is flowing there, this must be done , thank you very much. yes, andriy klymenko, project manager at the black sea institute of strategic studies, told about not at all tyuyunovy, how it turned out to be the fleet of the russians, with which they export their crude oil, and now we have to take a break literally for a moment, we return, a journalist who joined the armed forces, a political expert who became a special agent, taras berezovyts in a new projects on espresso. the real front is a thorough analysis of the main ones. reports, comments of leading specialists and experts, analytics from the major of the armed forces. how to make sense of disturbing news and distinguish truth from hostile propaganda. the real program front with taras berezovets, every saturday at 21:30 at espresso. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my

name is vasyl zima, this is a big broadcast on the espresso tv channel. two hours of air time. two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished studio guests. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day. the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for the intelligent and those who care. espresso at dinner. summer. it

time for rest and recovery. and i believe that this year we will be able to present a real fairy tale and a little peace for the children, whose world she destroyed. war. these are the children of fallen heroes, father or mother, who, protecting you and me, our country, died at the front. and they, like no other, need our support, because they are the future of our country. our experience has shown that travel helps children recover more quickly after a loss. children feel better too. i am asking you to support our project. we we are planning to organize two trips for the children of fallen heroes this summer. children will experience bright emotions, they will get to know a new country, a new culture, find new friends, and most importantly, they will receive

the help of qualified psychologists. and maybe now this video will be seen by entrepreneurs or owners of large businesses who will be ready to join. and help, remember that your donations are the key, the key to the hope, dreams and support of those who lost a loved one, because their parents went to protect our country. i really liked the trip to austria, loved the museums we went to every day, it was amazing and i really loved how we went to restaurants. i visited the cities of salzburg, vienna and linz. this trip affected me quite a bit... positively, i became more cheerful, thank you very much for such an incredible trip, it will never be forgotten in my heart, let's give memories together that will warm our hearts and help us survive these difficult and scary moments. congratulations

again, khairla kunier, you are watching a joint project of the first crimean tatar tv channel i, gulsum khalilova, and my colleague andriy yanitsky work for you in the studio of atr and the tv channel razom birabir. thank you, and now we have bohdan dalintze, aviation expert on call, manager of the aviation sector. mr. bohdan, congratulations. congratulations congratulations. let's start the conversation with ukrainian drones, which. fall into russian territory, but every day the ministry of defense of the russian federation literally declares that it shoots down 120 ukrainian drones, then 100, then 70, 115, have we really already learned how to attack russian territory with such a number of drones and

are they actually shooting them down or are they just telling their viewers to their audience that drones are shooting down we are actually hitting the mark. well, look, if we are talking about the specified one. the number is more than a hundred drones that would have achieved their goal, we actually saw a much brighter reaction of the russians, and not a single, corresponding oil tank would have burned. does not start tens at the same time, here, therefore, there are probably two important compositions here, the first is important to say that the russians regularly like to inflate the real numbers in order to report to their citizens, that is, not seeing how ukraine effectively destroys dozens or hundreds of their corresponding shaket drones, and in order not to look much worse, they simply increase these numbers, relatively speaking, dozens of drones, they increase to a hundred, and non-existent drones just record. to those who shot down, the generals rejoice, because they receive medals, the corresponding servicemen who are close to them

receive bonuses, that is, everyone remains satisfied, if we actually look at this situation, we must understand that after all part of the drones, it can be destroyed one way or another, and this is absolutely normal, we see that even these shahedin are launched, as a rule, there is still a certain percentage, which is 10-15%, unfortunately, it achieves its goals, ukrainian drones themselves, i hope that this percentage is much higher, because in the official data, what number is launched and which hits directly on one or another object, unfortunately, there is no, so it is difficult to assess the effectiveness of ukrainian drones in particular, but the number ulanks and destroyed drones, which are shown by the relevant russian military, she definitely does not say that there are hundreds of these drones, after all, we are talking about the launch of dozens of large drones. range, but relatively speaking, cheap small drones can be used to cover them, which

are launched including a buffer zone, i.e. up to 50 km, this is the front line or the territory bordering the russian federation, where there is a sufficiently aggressive system of radio-electronic warfare and a lot of air defense , here i am i would like to point out one more question to you guys, i would like to point out that the russians mostly use the same models without... but ukraine is constantly experimenting, i remember the beaver, then the drone that they didn't have at first names, then they began to call it the february, then some other modifications, that is, we are constantly doing some kind of experimental work, and it is connected, as i understand it, with the fact that we cannot use western models of such weapons for a dew attack. therefore, they are forced to develop something of their own, and the russians buy just ready-made iranian models, or am i

wrong, or do we act in approximately the same way, well , look, the situation here is quite different, because the first important component, most of the drones, they all consist of western components, including navigation systems, control systems, engines, etc. and if you look in principle at these products, which are also ukrainian, including those that are purchased outside of ukraine, then this is still a certain kind of zop. fleet of different drones, there are several reasons, because on the one hand, of course, eh, resources on market access and procurement, they are limited, that is, you have to buy not thousands, but tens or hundreds, and all this is stretched over months of their supply, that is, from different suppliers, different models in order to cover the required amount. the second important component, of course, is domestic production, but it is also based on western components, nowadays it is quite difficult for russians to get these components. first of all, if it is self-assembling the so-called dual purpose trolley, and this, of course, narrows

teresian's ability to create new models of unmanned vehicles, because after all, the main market where they can take these components is the chinese market, but it also has certain limitations, and this leads to the fact that the range, it narrows, here, on the one hand, on the other hand, it still works, if the model, when, after all, the state has and... already internal production for assembling these drones, kamikazes of the shaket type, they simply take them en masse in order to reduce them cost, that is, in principle, ukraine could also move in the direction of creating large powerful factories for the production of thousands of drones, but such factories, unfortunately, will become almost instantly the target of the enemy, so another system works, so-called, as it works at sea, the so-called mosquito fleet, the same works with production, that is , diversification, small producers, a large number, that is, it is impossible to destroy such production in principle. well, it is interesting that we

have drones that fly even to bashkortostan and tatarstan, and this, if i am not mistaken, is 1200 and 1300 km, but very i wonder what kind of drones these are and where is the real russian air defense? well, look, if we talk about this case, so far we are talking, unfortunately, about single such lesions, that is, unfortunately, we are not talking about some serial drone. that is, most likely we are talking about a convertible so-called ultra-light aircraft, and besides, such strikes at such a long distance of more than 100 km, there are only a few of them today, its key task is precisely to pass the air defense system of buffernu, here, in fact, 50 -60 km after the border with the russian federation the so-called internal airspace of the russian federation begins, where it is possible to fly a long distance almost unnoticed with low mobility and be shot down, because the existing complexes are the c300, c400, they are trained to destroy large targets at high speeds,

usually at heights there three or more kilometers, if we look at these drones that express russian objects, they fly at much lower altitudes, at the same time, the biggest danger for those such drones is not so much the air defense system, because even specialized panzeris russia has only about a hundred units, and the more serious ones are electronic warfare systems, that is, rebs, which can also affect the navigation signal, and this leads to the fact that such drones can physically simply fall and crash, we see that the number of so-called drones intercepted by the russians is not measured by the number of downed drones, but mainly shows the wreckage of drones that were directly planted or destroyed by the use of drones, and recently the center for strategic communications, he calculated the losses of the russian occupiers in the territory of the temporarily occupied crimea over the past 3-4 months, and there they write

that russia has lost dozens of air defense systems. dozens of s-300, s-350, s-400 systems, and more importantly , russia lost 15 radar stations. recently, it became known that russia has already, unfortunately, repaired the kerch crossing. please tell me if they will be able to recover all these losses that we have seen in the last 3-4 months and how much they need for this. well, look, from the point of view of the air defense system itself, the production cycle is long enough, that is , we can be talking about years here. at the same time, the number of systems that the russian federation has remains quite large, that is, we are talking about hundreds, one of such complexes, at the same time, in order to cover individual objects on the territory of the crimean peninsula, they will need

to shoot these objects from other parts of the russian federation, thus reducing the protection of certain objects, this is primarily. dromiv, individual cities. this is, of course, directly, thus creating more gaps for the possibility of drones, for example, to enter the territory of the russian federation from other directions, because today we only see strikes inflicted on drones flying from the territory of ukraine, but taking into account that this area and coverage of anti-aircraft warfare will decrease, then in principle nothing prevents the creation, conditional conversion of the ship into an aircraft carrier of such drones and strikes on... other territories of the russian federation, but of course it is necessary to understand how these ships will then safely leave the zone affected by russian aircraft or corresponding sea vessels. here, in addition, if we talk specifically about the destruction of anti-aircraft defense systems on the territory of crimea, this may be one of the stages of preparation for the next military operations on the territory of crimea, including the use of western aviation platforms,

such as the f16, because in principle rarefaction and destruction of anti-aircraft systems. of defense, it is possible to do this in crimea today much easier than, for example, in other regions, because there is less forest there, and there are certain corresponding mountainous areas, that is , the number of locations where these systems can be deployed is much smaller, so moving to other locations or hiding is also quite difficult due to the lack of a large amount of forest, that is, in fact, crimea turns into a kind of shooting range for the destruction of russian air defense systems. sufficiently high efficiency, and plus there are ukrainian partisans who, of course, report on e the movement of russian military equipment, and quite effectively, as far as i know, we know directly about several partisan groups, the largest of them, and also, i wanted to ask about the magura marine platoons, i know, i understand that you are aviation experts, there is also an aviation topic here, on

missiles that hit air targets are now installed on sea platforms, how effective is it in general... the use of a sea platform to launch such missiles, or is it just experiments for now? well, look, we see that, in principle, the number of such installations with a starter has increased, here at the same time, these installations pose a key threat to helicopters, as well as to aircraft that fly at low altitude, mainly, if we talk about flights at low altitude, then it is exactly fighter aircraft that can conduct reconnaissance or search for such sea drones for their further that is, in fact, this is one of the means of protecting these naval drones from attacks from the air, here, because these missiles, they have a so-called thermal homing head, but... intake from the ground, it has certain limitations, first of all, it affects on the maximum range at which such missiles can operate, i.e. they are reduced from tens of kilometers there to two or three times there,

i.e. to a significantly shorter range, it also affects the maximum height to which these missiles can fly, i.e. if they foresee the destruction of a target at an altitude of 10-12 km at ranges there of about 50-70 km, unfortunately, the bush of land will limit the maximum height there to three cheats possible. km and, of course , the maximum range there will probably not exceed 10-12 km, due to the fact that air resistance near the ground, it is much greater, the first component, the second component, that when the rocket is launched from the plane, it already has an additional speed of the order of 500-600 km and more per hour, and when launched from the ground, it has, that is, an initial speed there of tens of kilometers and of course she loses the most energy for this, that is, this approach can be effective. but exclusively against a sufficiently narrow list of the whole, that is, these are helicopters, planes that can directly conduct reconnaissance and search for such drones. mr. bohdan, i remember

even before the full-scale invasion, you as a civil aviation expert, and you, i think, could comment on the question of the restoration of civil aviation, whether it is realistic to restore it during the conduct of hostilities, or do we still have to wait until russia capitulates? well, look, here too. sufficiently complex, that is, we see, there are already world examples of israel as well, when air traffic, it was restored and even its suspension there was no more than six hours, including in the conditions of existing rocket attacks, which were somewhat commensurate with the waves of shelling carried out against ukraine by the russian federation. at the same time, we see that ukraine has not yet made such a decision, so the decision to open the airspace must be initiated by ukraine. there was information about the beginning of certain consultations there with such world aviation regulators as the fa, this is the american administration and easa, the european

aviation safety agency, along with which results we have not seen from these negotiations, here is what they were, whether they were positive or not. negative, but in principle we see that there are experiences and approaches in the world, that is, this is the so-called segmentation of airspace, when not all airspace is closed, separate zones are defined, risks for these zones are taken into account, and a decision is made about certain restrictions and flight conditions in separate zones, that is, there are options, there are also approaches, here the question remains technical and political, the political readiness of the relevant state authorities to make a decision that they are ready to open this air connection, the second important word is, of course , a technical one, i.e. today air traffic is controlled in principle by the military, i.e. there must also be their readiness and the statement that they can ensure and coordinate the safe operation of, if not the entire airspace, then separately defined airfields or separately defined zones, including the development of the relevant legal

framework, i.e. how who reacts, who makes decisions, how aircraft operate in conditions of certain threats, how aircraft operate on the ground, how are the relevant airports in operation, do they have a storage facility, how and for what time are they supposed to move other passengers to the conditional storage there from possible missile ... or other strikes, well, here are the airports that can be launched first, let’s have some kind of pariah with you let's conclude, something lviv, uzhgorod, kyiv, that this will be the first, well, look, first of all, we understand that from the point of view of the means of destruction that reach, the ports that are farthest from the corresponding launchers of the russian federation, they have a higher level security, i.e. the probability of a drone flying there to lviv or uzhhorod, it is substantially less than the probability of a drone flying to kyiv, in addition, the risks and efficiency of shooting down certain objects are superimposed on this map, i.e. we see a sufficiently high efficiency around kyiv and the number of protected targets, i.e. here, first of all

, this zone of more protected cities includes both kyiv and individual airfields in western ukraine, but in order to make an actual assessment, it is necessary to have a complete the picture, that is, all the statistics on launches and destroyed targets and to understand the available air defense systems, which... means of attack they can destroy, that is, can they destroy only cruise missiles, missiles and drone communications, or can they also counter ballistic missiles of certain types or certain characteristics. thank you very much, mr. bohdan. chokhsaglana, who found time and joined our broadcast, we will meet in other broadcasts of the atr tv channel and tv channel. why do we have bohdan dolinse, he was with us on direct communication, aviation expert, aviation sector manager. i want to urge viewers who watch us on youtube to be sure to subscribe to the youtube channel, if you watch on youtube, respectively on ater, preferably on both youtube channels, and

put a favorite. ring the bell and comment on this broadcast, we come after the broadcasts in the comments and answer questions, if they are based on the essence of the issues that we touched on in our broadcasts, and this is really very important for us, very important, as for the espressa tv channel, so for the atp tv channel, because the more people just like or just write comments, the more others who haven't seen our broadcasts, haven't heard our broadcasts, will already see them too, well, unfortunately, yes... youtube's algorithm is working and they will also be able to simply hear the news about crimea, about occupied crimea and about everything that happens there, because it is very important, it is such a bridge, one might say, and between matrak ukraine and occupied crimea, that is, we say to occupied crimea that ukraine does not forget about crimea, and ukraine is really doing everything today for its deoccupation, v

to ukraine... we tell the part of ukraine that people in the territory of the temporarily occupied crimea are still waiting for the armed forces of ukraine. players, i would like to conduct just such a bridge between mainland ukraine and crimea and see while in mainland ukraine, on the banks of the dnieper, the beaches are full of people, the crimean beaches are empty, we have a corresponding video, i will ask our technical team to show this video . this is something incredible, the heat is enormous in the crimea, but at the same time there are no vacationers there, and even i would say, here are the shots that we see, that and the beaches are not sufficiently prepared for recreation, and they are rather preparing for the offensive of the armed forces of ukraine than for recreation, and at the same time, you can observe what is happening on the beaches in kyiv,

you can not swim everywhere, there is... martial law, but we we can also see people moving and swimming on and in kayaks and, in principle, resting on the beach on the shore, but really all this will change when ukraine returns to crimea and returns crimea to ukraine, and then everything will change, as it was before 2014 year, and finally, i urge you, if you see on on the screen... bar code, transfer money, precisely for the liberation of crimea, a unit of oshb-48, which bears the name of noman chilibin. this unit was created from crimeans, who are mostly crimean tatars, and who seek to liberate their homeland. well, unfortunately, we are already ending this broadcast, stay with

us, stay with the first one. khvytarsk atr tv channel and espresso tv channel and we will meet in a week. i am andriy yanitsky and my colleague gulsum khalilova were with you today. goodbye. see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova candidates for the vrp according to the president's quota. how to save up for luxury food. rations from the state, i am a person who knows how to save money, and what new facts of judge gorbasenko's dishonesty have been discovered by the gerd. the fortunes were analyzed and a conclusion was made that there are no questions. congratulations, judicial control is on the air. institutional rebooting and personnel renewal of the judiciary based on the norms of professional ethics and integrity is the basis of the judicial reform currently underway in ukraine. its successful

implementation is... the main requirement for ours the further path to the eu, however, how successfully the transformation is taking place and whether the moral and professional qualities of the judges meet high standards, we will talk today, but first the news: the sixth administrative appeals court refused to renew the former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv in the staff of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed. the legality of the release of lviv on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's possession of russian citizenship. we will remind you that bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to information journalists of the scheme project, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine. and in 2012, at the age of 45 , he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already on the last one.