its successful implementation is the main requirement for our further path to the eu. however, today we will talk about how successfully the transformation is taking place and whether the moral and professional qualities of justice officials meet high standards. but first to the news. the sixth administrative court of appeal refused to reinstate former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv. states of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's release on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's russian citizenship. we will remind you, bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and at the age of 45 in 2012 , he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already on the last one.

at the second meeting, the representative of the security service of ukraine reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers that russian citizenship of lviv exists, but now they can neither prove nor refute the information about the presence of citizenship is impossible. bohdan lviv still continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the country of the aggressor. the high qualifications commission of judges continues to clean the judicial system from unscrupulous servants of themis. recently, an interview regarding the suitability of the position held by the duty officer. was held by pavlo gorbasenko, judge and head of the economic court of the kyiv region. consideration of this issue takes place after it was postponed for the previous time to find out additional information. last year, the commission postponed the final decision decision on gorbasenko and expected additional explanations and documents from him. therefore, at this meeting , the question of whether he will remain in the judge's chair was to be finally decided. during this time, the public council of integrity discovered new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and drew up a new report. in order for the members of the commission

to have the opportunity to study the conclusion, the member of the grd, veronika kraydenkova, submitted a motion to postpone the meeting. as a matter of fact, there should have been a review and completion of the review of the question of his suitability for the position, but the public council of integrity proposed to adjourn the meeting because we voted on a new decision yesterday. the new conclusion of the state administrative court states that the father of judge volodymyr gorbasenko , in the midst of a full-scale war unleashed by russia against ukraine, conducts business in temporarily ... occupied crimea. he lives in the territory captured by the russians and is a co-founder of two limited liability companies: sevele nastok and unvest, respectively, he pays taxes to the aggressor country. what's more, the judge's father turned out to be a suspect base peacekeeper. as it turned out in february -march of 2022, volodymyr gorbasenko's mobile number was recorded in roaming on the territory of the kyiv region temporarily occupied at that time, which may indicate his participation in russian aggression. after the capture of russia. in crimea, gorbasenko's wife

issued a power of attorney to his father-in-law to dispose of his property on the peninsula, while volodymyr gorbasenko granted similar rights to his son, a judge. everything points to the fact that the head of the economic court of the kyiv region maintains close ties with his father, who may turn out to be a collaborator. we also see that there is information that he most likely maintains ties with his father, which can be a definite criterion for his being recognized as unscrupulous. the public integrity council paid attention. and the second fictitious divorce of judge gorbasenko and his wife, deputy of the kyiv city council hanna sveredenko, is likely. they allegedly broke up for the first time at the end of 2014. however, they remained in such a wonderful relationship that they went to europe together 5 days after the divorce. in february 2017, she was born to a former spouse the first child, joint trips abroad became more frequent. in 2022, the couple married again, gave birth to a second child within a year, and divorced again. by filing two identical

divorce suits to do so, presumably to manipulate the distribution system. one lawsuit was returned, another was accepted and considered with abnormal speed in a matter of days, with violations of all procedural terms. the divorce took place just before the opening of the register of declarations. so there is every reason to believe that the couple's goal was to hide part of their income and property. grobosenko submitted, firstly, a clarifying declaration for 2022, and secondly, we have yet to. we have to check some of his declarations, and we see that his wife sverdenko is listed again as his wife, and he has another point, and we would also like to pay a little more attention to this fact. a lot of questions and benefits of the judge arise. most of the property owned by gorbasenko allegedly came to him from his mother. she gave two apartments in the capital of 116 and 136 m2, in a luxury area on the obolon embankment, and built a house for herself with more than 800 m2 in the village of lebedi. near kyiv, while the woman

did not run a business, but was a housewife. the wife, or rather the ex-wife, during her stay in marriage with gorbasenko, from 2012 to 14 years, also acquired a lot. by the amount of real estate, a house of 122 m2, two apartments of 164 and 155 m2, two parking spaces and two plots of land, and all this with a total income for that period of uah 1 million. in addition to property in kyiv, real estate in the temporarily occupied crimea is also added, where hanna sverdenko has four non-residential premises in gaspri, under yalta, as well as several plots of land in sudak and a house of more than 300 m2. gorbasenko to provide an explanation. regarding these facts is refused, the information that is compiled allegedly in the new conclusion has already been investigated, has already been justified and refuted, i am categorically against the adjournment, and i will ask the honorable

members of the commission to continue the review. after a closed discussion of the higher qualifications, the commission nevertheless decided to postpone the consideration of gorbasenko. based on the results of the discussion , a protocol decision is announced. on postponement of the review question. we asked pavlo gorbasenko about the probable intention to hide real marital relations, connections with the terrorist state and simpletons that cause doubts. mr. pavlo, please tell me what your father did while roaming in the occupied kyiv region. your divorce from your wife seems questionable, given that you have a second child. i don't want to answer you on the go, if you want to do a good interview, then come visit, send questions. and even about the fortunes analyzed by the public council, good guesses, fortunes have been analyzed and a conclusion has been drawn that there are no questions, wealth, so let's not make up a report out of something that doesn't exist. we hope that, after a careful study of all newly discovered facts that may testify

to the dishonesty of judge pavlo gorbasenko, the commission will make a fair decision regarding him. the ethics council has completed interviews with candidates. for the position of a member of the supreme council of justice under the quota of president volodymyr zelenskyi. currently, vrp has 17 members out of 20 members. the president must appoint two and for more than a year and a half, the seats are empty, and the applicants are doubtful. this is nataliya panchenko, judge of the kyiv district administrative court. and she has a wonderful friendly family and good social security. so he lives in his mother's apartments, which his sister bought, drives his daughter's car, and eats rations from the state. a person who knows how to save, and i had no need to spend. since 2022 , panchenko and her husband have been living in an apartment designed for the judge's mother. 64 m almost in the center of kyiv, she bought it back in december 2012. allegedly for real estate

were dumped by the whole family. the financing of this apartment took place, once again i am talking about the fact that at the expense of the savings of my mother, father, ah, ... my mother's father, i also said that the financing of this purchase of this apartment was also participated by my sister, under during the interview, as a candidate for the higher qualification commission, judge, you said that your sister provided the money for the purchase, her income from 1998 to 2012 was... a total of uah 680,28,332. maybe i answered incorrectly then. two years before the acquisition of this one the judge's sister bought another apartment for her mother in the capital with an area of ​​34 square meters. but a woman never lived in any of them. instead

, natalia panchenko and her husband used the real estate. why did you live in this apartment? did your sister buy the apartment where you lived? why so? i would not like to make this apartment for my sister public at all, but due to certain life circumstances, she purchased it, at the same time she remained living where she lived, there was no need for me, my family to purchase an apartment in connection with by the fact that we understood that in the near future we will receive an apartment from the state. natalia panchenko always had a lot of hopes for the state, with the help of social security, for example, she even managed to buy a new audi q7, issued for her daughter, but the judge herself used the car. in our country , such as the maintenance of officers and their families at the expense of the state was introduced. and i want

to tell you about the fact that i can get confused in my hands right now, along with this somewhere before the third grade of my daughter, because i just remember how we lived, that's how we were. or not we did not spend money on housing, because the state compensated for it, we did not spend money on food, because the state also provided us with this. and that was the concept of rations, well, in russian , pay, well, pay, well, that is, when an officer was given food for himself and his family members. the judge's whole family obviously knows how to save, her husband managed to buy a motorcycle with a market value of more than $700, 15 times cheaper. it is a completely ordinary motorcycle. what i see is as far as i can judge. from the side an outside observer, there is nothing like that at all, please explain such

a huge difference between the real price of the motorcycle and this agreement of the parties, and why the price was exactly that, i do not know, because i was not a participant in this relationship, why he sold it for exactly at such a price, i don't know, maybe panchenko doesn't see the problem, because she herself gives away her own cars for nothing, she sold hers for uah 100, she says the car was badly damaged in an accident. in general, questions about the integrity of the judge of the kyiv district administrative court nataliya panchenko, u there was a lot of ethical advice. soon we will find out whether the servant of tsifemida managed to convince the experts of his suitability for the position, a member of the supreme council of justice. and for today, i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tatiana. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report

an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. today in... the program verdict with serhii rudenko. a just peace will prevail. president zelenskyi's team is preparing to hold a second peace summit in a few months, to which russia may be included. will an alternative chinese peace conference not interfere with ukraine's plans. development of the axis of evil. the defense agreement between putin and kim jong-un caused concern in the world because. the storm of development of the north korean nuclear program. does this encourage the americans to recognize russia

as a state sponsor of terrorism? corruption of ukraine as a stereotype. between kyiv and tensions are rising in washington over the issue of fighting corruption. what could be the consequences of western partners' claims to zelenskyi and his team. glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program, my name is serhii rudenko, i congratulate everyone and wish everyone good health. in the next two hours , we will talk about ukraine, the world, the war, and our victory. let's talk about the results of the global peace summit, which ended last week in switzerland, and about the drafts of the future peace summit, which should be held at the end of this year. putin's voyage to the north. and vietnam and the creation of a new axis of evil, which will include russia, north korea,

iran, syria and belarus. we will talk about all this in the next two hours. however, before starting our big conversation, i suggest you watch the video of how our defense forces hit the russian infrastructure this night and hit airfields and... oil refineries in the krasnoyarsk territory, in particular in the area of ​​the village of afipskyi in the krasnodar territory more than 10 explosions were reported, the network also reported about a drone attack in yeysk, in yeysk, there it is precisely where the military airfield of the russian federation is located. let's see what were the consequences of these strikes? the boys

are flying somewhere, well, the field is on fire, it's really scary, the smoke is standing still, the smoke is already passing by us. some words to the armed forces of ukraine and the defense forces of ukraine and the death of the russians. to the occupiers friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms. please join our pages and participate in our poll. today we are asking you about whether russia should be invited to the second peace summit. yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube. if you have a separate opinion of your own that goes

beyond these two unequivocal answers. please write in the comments under the video. if you watch us on tv, take it. background or phone and vote if you think russia should be invited to the second peace summit (0800-211-381), no 0800 211 382. at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of this vote. i want to introduce our first guest today is the captain of the armed forces of ukraine, ukrainian politician and statesman, former prosecutor general of ukraine and former minister of internal affairs yuriy lutsenko. yury vitalivych. good evening. i congratulate you. well , let's start with the results of the global peace summit, the global peace summit ended last sunday, a lot has already been said, a lot of conclusions have already been drawn and they have already started talking about the second peace summit, what ukraine gained and what it lost by holding the peace summit, maybe it's about losses and

too much said, but what did ukraine not achieve and what could it achieve at this summit? when... you and i and many other journalists talked before the summit, everyone wondered what its meaning was? i said then that it was just the head of the president's office. yaermak decided to occupy his boss with something he likes, a large gathering of people, loud applause, a place for pathetic speeches, but i was not completely right. because, on the one hand, i relied on simple things: last year , the un general assembly 141 votes in favor and seven against, confirmed the territorial integrity of ukraine and recognized russia's aggression as inconsistent with the founding documents of the united nations. after that

, many more summits took place, each time with a larger number of participants, but none of it was a prize. led to the retreat of russia or even the intention to stop in this crazy bloody putin adventure, so what is this summit for, and i thought it was just for zelensky to finally hear the applause, without which it is very difficult for him, but i was not completely right, only half, because in fact, from my point of view, this summit was best described by the political commentator yevgeny magda, who said that this very... in switzerland, the alpine mountains gave birth to three mice, that is, of the 10 points of zelensky's peace plan, only three remained discussed by this so-called global summit, there is no mention of the withdrawal of russian troops, there is no mention of money for the restoration of the ukrainian economy,

compensation for the victims and suffering of the ukrainian people, there is no legal responsibility for war criminals. is only three mice: nuclear security, food security and the exchange of captured and kidnapped children, a large number of world leaders came there, the success of ukrainian diplomacy must be recognized here, they gathered these people, more than 80 heads of state, government or high officials gathered, but these three points seem... no, mythical. well, if you say that the super oppositionist is telling me, well, let's come back to this conversation in a month, or two if you want. do you think that after this vote, russia will give us the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant? i sure not. do you think that it will stop bombing odesa, mykolaiv, kherson, and izmail ports? no. do you

think that even thousands of our prisoners, including the fighters of the heroic azov, will give? and ten? thousands of stolen children, sure not, then what was it all for? and we received the answer just a few days before this summit, and now these answers continue every day, because in addition to the three mice that this swiss summit gave birth to, there is also one big molehill that leads zelensky to the kremlin. now all are senior officials state officials and their subordinates say that the next summit will be from a representative. russia themselves, that's what they themselves say, and zelenskyi and yarmak said that we are seeing a second peace summit with the participation of the russian side, but today kuleba, among other things, clarified what they meant, my god. this needed clarification, he said that he allows that the experience of the black sea grain initiative can be used to participate in the second peace summit, and now we will listen to what

the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine said. when ukraine held talks there with turkey and the un, then turkey and the un held talks with russia, and the agreement looked like a document signed between turkey, the un and ukraine. and turkey, the un and russia. that is, yuri vitalivych, i understand correctly that the first peace summit is a corridor to the next room, where the representatives of russia will sit. yes, absolutely, and this is what the president, the head of his office, and his foreign minister are saying , but yesterday our envoy in singapore made a generally sensational statement that this summit, that ukraine does not rule out participation. in the beijing, chinese format of negotiations with the russian federation, well, we were all shocked, but imagine the feelings of, for example,

washington, berlin, london, paris, which for 2.5 years invested enormous efforts, funds, weapons in the victory of ukraine, and suddenly found out, that the negotiations on the end of the war will be conducted by their strategic opponent, china, but just think about... yes, this is about the wisdom of our foreign policy, now what koleba said, i apologize, well , let's comment a little, mr. kuleba says that an analogue some negotiations with russia through an intermediary, the un in this case was already there, well , okay, so what, but it was unsuccessful, and that zernova was safe after these negotiations, no, it became safe only because of the actions of the armed forces of ukraine, which ... they drove the black sea fleet of the russian federation to the bottom of novorossiysk, and they finish it off there, that's all. i am referring to koleva's second initiative, which i did not mention.

have we not forgotten how many crimean platforms we already had? last year in crimean 80 representatives of the countries of the world gathered on the platform to the fanfare of turbadur bank. and that crimea is demilitarized? deoccupied? is he committed to ukraine? oh no. russia does not pay attention to the methods of the civilized world at all, from the very beginning of this terrible war, putin destroyed all the security systems established in 1945 by the victors over fascism, there is no un, and by the way, this global summit in switzerland shows that there is no un site, we have to gather somewhere else, and there were no un representatives. the secretary-general himself, who he is so worried about starving africa, he did not even appear when asked about the grain corridor, magate, which the russians also have somewhere, although nuclear security and

so on were discussed, the red cross did not come there, although prisoners and children were discussed, he did not go there come, yes, russia broke all its obligations to the osce, to international institutions, to international agreements, bilateral, tripartite, any, it broke all this and fulfilled the garbage. she said we don't want to admit it the order in the world that guaranteed the relative security of large and small countries, strong and weak countries, established by the victors over hitler. the new hitler does not recognize all this, and therefore to speak with them in diplomatic languages, even through intermediaries, in the form of a half-corpse of the un, is, well, to put it mildly... i think it is a fog. kuleba, like a diplomat, starts a fog for us. and the essence boils down to one thing: for the first time, ukraine publicly declared and

even sealed in the decision of the summit that the next summit will be with russia. moreover, there are no prerequisites, as before, and no 10 points zelenskyi's peaceful formula no longer sounds. from my point of view, this is a loss. no, ukrainian diplomacy has demonstrated miracles. she was able to gather a representative summit, the ukrainian president demonstrated his ability to make public speeches, but everything else failed, a failure in the desire to lure china and the so -called global south led by it there, they simply did not come, and those who came actually spoke against the ukrainian interests, and the main failure is that we now agreed to talk with... russia, moreover without the main condition of withdrawal of troops. now let's look at it a little, well, from above, not as a summit, but as

a global one. the event at the front, which was written by zuluzhny back in the autumn of last year, was established exactly like a trench war, where neither side has a serious tool to push the front, we pay for it with the lives of our soldiers and have an advantage in their heroism, resilience and in the fact that we on their land, plus western weapons are often... technologically better, the russians have an advantage in their willingness to give their lives for it, kabis, with which they destroy our positions, and a much larger number of outfits, but nevertheless the balance, and in this situation it becomes obvious that there is a possibility, even a necessity, to stop this form of war, or to find a strategic form of strategic superiority.

and win back their land, or look for a way to end the war in order to buy time, like during the minsk agreements, and build stronger armed forces, yes, at this moment , both sides, who in politics, in business , act equally, declare their wishes , putin said that he would not agree to anything less than four ukrainian regions, of course we can say a lot about it. we can say the words in short words, but they are all obscene, so i will allow myself to skip these emotions, from the point of view of ukraine, we also have to make an application, and zelensky also repeated it in his speech in paris, the border of 1991 , right, right, now someday these negotiations will begin, because any war ends with negotiations, well, for example, about ending the war, but each side

is trying to become stronger until that moment. and here is putin he does a lot for this, he receives a huge flow of cheap, but a large number of weapons from north korea, he receives a serious material supply from china, he cements his society, 30% of russians who at the beginning of the war were against this war, they are simply gone. he ultimately controls belarus and can do anything there at any minute , he is undermining our positions in the west, and he had great success when for several months we could not get another supply of weapons, our troops simply bled without shells, rockets, etc. thank god, now this situation is over. he is undermining ukrainian society from the inside, very

effectively. ipso against mobilization, a very effective ipso against zelensky, and so on and so forth, that is, the russians are gaining weight before the negotiations. pay attention to why he says that zelensky is illegitimate all the time. the last statement, it seems, of the head of their pseudo-parliament, that the time has come to speak without zelensky, with the only legitimate body they consider to be the ukrainian parliament. that is, they are trying to undermine it here as well. the ukrainian position, and everything is clear here, they are enemies, but they act, well, it must be admitted, well, quite powerfully, now the question is what the ukrainian side is doing in order to strengthen its positions before a diplomatic confrontation with the enemy, with the aggressor and criminals, the ukrainian side is gathering a peace summit, not a war summit, sergius, a peace summit, and he says no, no, we will not mention the withdrawal of the occupying forces, no, no, we will not mention crimea,

donbass. uh, half of the kherson region and 2/3 of the zaporizhzhia region, we don't want this, so as not to scare the global south and china. we will not talk about anything at all, let's just start negotiations. this is very reminiscent of a wednesday mediation. after that, the ukrainian authorities do everything not to cement society. there have been no talks with the opposition for many years. journalists are discredited, who is not afraid, receives a summons, or him. children receive a summons, and therefore everyone is silent, well, with the exception of sufficiently heroic ones, oppositional and objective journalists, and unfortunately, they can be counted on the fingers of four hands, her energy is, well, i'm sorry, half a billion dollars have been drained.