let's talk in literally two minutes, but in blix poll format, how would you answer this question, do you believe that trump is capable of ending the war in ukraine, olga? no, of course, he is not capable of doing this in any way, moreover, he absolutely, in my opinion, does not, well, does not understand the reality around this, that is, he says something that he thinks sounds very bright, he tries to guess some certain american audience there. from life and speak with appropriate slogans, but he does not know the reality of this policy understands absolutely, i.e. it was visible even from the fact that he was speaking, the war would never have started, he was the president when the war was going full steam ahead, and why didn’t he end it, well, the question is rhetorical, bohdan, well, you definitely need to understand , that of course he is now saying what his voters want to hear, the main thing is to show him. everything that

says, in fact, trump must understand that he must be shown that biden is incompetent, he is so active, cool, and he can do it with one finger in the background this type of infirm grandfather, well, that is all his words, he has, if you, well, i then moved on to this debate, for him everything comes down to two things, that biden is infirm and that the border, border, border, border, border. everything else is actually a derivative and ukraine, believe me , it played far from the most important role there, but what if he can end this war, well, look, theoretically, of course. the president of america has some serious powers to actually do some very serious things, but still, let's not forget that there is congress democratic, and oh, excuse me, the senate, where the democrats are in the majority, and very much i would say, the tight situation in the congress, where the republicans have a majority, it seems to be three votes, that can be destroyed at any moment, so i don't think that trump , even if he really thought something like that and wanted to, he is able to do it quickly, because...

there are too many different, let's say, fuses for this, another matter is that i do not rule out that he is asking the question of ukraine will try, if he becomes president, he will try to solve immediately as quickly as possible, why, because everyone likes to start with a small victorious war, relatively speaking, if he decides that this type of topic is effective for him, well, i would not underestimate the fact that this person can rush with all the passion of his nature to this fact , what will come of it? another question, but i would not exclude these moments, i would include it in our, so to speak, scenario planning, i would take into account the possibility that he would decide that it should be done. unfortunately. thank you bohdan. well, actually, we have to explain to our viewers, those who did not watch these debates, this is the first time this round of these pre-election debates took place, two more politicians, because now they do not have the official status of presidential candidates, the official ones will take place only in september. it was

the first round of pre-election debates, it took place in the cnn studio in atlanta, it lasted 90 minutes, it was a rare case of an early debate, because again, they are not the official candidates of their two parties, and this debate was heavily moderated, the participants were expressly forbidden to interrupt each other because during past debates which took place in 2020, trump interrupted biden quite often. and decided not to repeat this trick on the air, and hired two moderators, jake tepper and dana besh, they had the ability to stop two opponents or two debaters at any time. after these debates took place, in the new york times, political columnist thomas friedman wrote that biden should withdraw from the presidential race. and i'm talking about

what thomas friedman said, wrote, or rather, i don't remember a more frantic moment in american presidential politics than anything his life, precisely because he showed: "joe biden, a good person and a good president, should not be re-elected." olga, is it possible to judge by physical condition, or by the condition in questions and answers about biden, whether he can run for president or not. to run for office, he is 81, trump is 78, but this is again, as valery chaly said just before our broadcast, in the previous broadcast he told me that it is because american politicians are already at a respectable age, it is much better than young politicians , no-names in ukrainian politics, well, that is, two extremes, but still, what are your impressions of what happened, i how it happened myself. in terms of age fitness,

let's say two candidates? well, you know, you can say as much as you want about the fact that, in general, there is the ability to evoke a person. causing some emotions during the debate is not an indicator of whether he will be a good or bad president, that the professionalism of a politician has nothing to do with how he speaks or answers any questions, that's all the way it really is, but that's the problem for this debate so what, these debates were held, well, it was the idea of ​​the democrats to hold these early debates now, they hoped for them... no sense, and we see the result, the result turned out to be really amazing for them, that is, everything that they tried

from the point of view of mass communication to refute, as a result, this debate intensified it, that is , i am not talking now about the reality of who is a better president, who is better is better. is going to manage the state, because it is clear that biden is a much more experienced politician in this matter, well, it is 100%, he a more responsible politician, so the economy of the states is even growing now, in contrast to the moment when it was lifted from the knees of trump, even so, but all this in fact, as it turns out, does not play into the mass consciousness for some reason, that's how it happened, you know, and this is the reality that has to be... reckoned with, that is , the result is that it is biden's associates who are demoralized by this debate, it can play a very bad joke, because as a result, they may just not come to the boxes, they may just give up

from participating in the voting and so on is enough, well, let's say this, now mobilized this and that trump fan group will simply win, because it will come. to the ballot boxes themselves, and that's all, this can happen, and it's a big danger, yes, that is, the question that they tried to remove from the agenda, that there could be another candidate in the democratic party, on the contrary, became on the agenda, because started in the party, well, let's not publicly discuss there that maybe it is worth changing the candidate, this is also the result of these debates, it a bad result, it's a bad result, and at the end of the day, i just want to say about this maybe... the obvious thing, you know, we wouldn't be discussing biden's physical condition right now, not whether he can speak there for a long time and speak better than trump , if only one thing had happened, if during the presidency of biden, ukraine

would have taken its territories, repelled the russians and moved forward, but if ukraine had succeeded in the war, all these things now about... problems for biden would simply not exist, because he would have the appearance of a man who fights successfully for democracy in the world, what are the bad guys who carry out aggression, he really opposes them, and this is the result that this is not happening, that now biden's team has to talk about his physical health, this is the result of their political mistakes. they made a big political mistake when they bet that the war, the war... should be long, protracted, they will gradually exhaust russia, for some reason they forgot that by gradually exhausting russia, they are also exhausting ukraine, and what, well that slightly not disproportionate to the size of the country, and that if everything they gave us at least

in the summer of 23, they gave in the summer of 22 , then today's problems of biden simply would not exist, well, that is, in fact. we are now seeing the result of his political mistakes. thank you olga. bohdan, this debate was not mandatory, because the mandatory debate will be in september, when there will already be official candidates for the presidency of the united states of america, and it is absolutely obvious that this is such a test stone, probably the democratic teams, or if biden passes, these debates are official only later, because now, in principle, these are debates, well, maybe they can measure the affection for trump there. 63% against 37% in favor of biden, and why exactly did the americans have to have this debate and whether biden really can’t lead, as everyone is already starting to talk about it in whispers, but

trump is also, in principle, like olga said, not such a well-prepared politician as biden, because trump is, well , such an adventurer, a political adventurer in principle. he was during the first term of the presidency an adventurous such dude and still remains, because no it is clear what to expect from him in general, well , first of all, i am absolutely with you... that this was 100% rather an initiative of the headquarters of the democrats, well , look, the question is that really, unfortunately, it is again, here you are today they mentioned this column by frisman, and it’s a very cool column, i also read it this morning, and he also writes such things there, which are also very interesting, about what i was also saying until the end, like, i thought it was because of personal, like private meetings there with biden, that he is absolutely ok and everything is fine with him, there are no questions, but he says for the last ones for several months, i don't know what really happened, well, i don't know for sure... maybe he has more health problems. i will remind you that the american press is very fond of agreeing that he actually has progressive

parkinson's disease. i don't know if this is true. but this is often enough in the american press. well, that is , it is impossible to dismiss the fact that mr. biden's physical condition has deteriorated a little, especially since, you know, in america it is absorbed every day, believe me, very hard. i don't say anymore about how the russian brotherhood helps with this and so on. what am i leading to? it seems to me that this debate was necessary in a certain sense. you said very correctly so that the democrats themselves look at biden and understand, and in general it is like history or not, and i want to say that in fact, yes, now it is clear, they are now giving comments that no one there will change anyone and so further, but first let's wait for the next opinion polls and see the ratings after this debate, because again, according to what is already being published, well, trump is recognized as the winner by 2/3, but... but in the grand scheme of things, it really didn't matter what they would talk about, because it was obvious that trump

would not have much to say and never did. i'm telling you, he had an answer like a down boy to everything like what you can say there about january 6, 21, why did you give the command to storm the white house there, but at the time when we were there stormed the white house, we had no problems at the border, but just so you understand what they were this debate, how trump introduced this conversation. how it all happened, and what i am leading to, in fact, the main intrigue and task of mr. biden, at these debates, was to prove that he is energetic, that he can still do it, that there is still time in the powder bins, and so on, so on it’s a great pity, or not a pity, i don’t know, it depends on who likes who, but he couldn’t prove it, that is, yes, it’s clear that fact-checkers have already found dozens of facts in trump’s lies, of course biden... was a lot more clear in terms of facts, but, you understand very well that this is still a story

about emotions, it is not so important what you say, it is important how you say it, and here, unfortunately, mr. biden has shown that such all these, unfortunately, fears about the physical condition, they all, well, let's put it this way, unfortunately, they have ground under them, eh, and therefore i would not rule out, now, of course, no one will remove anyone from the elections and so on, but i will remind you that the republicans, in fact, this convention, where they will nominate their candidate, well, it will be trump, finally, i i think it will be in july, and for the democrats, if my memory serves me correctly, there is a number there, i think 9, or 9, it seems august 9, and i would not rule out that now they will be very, very active to study, so to speak, these polls, they will be very active in studying the opinion of the party sponsors, so i would not be 100% sure that it is joseph by... who will become the candidate of the democratic party, of course, the decision should be made by him personally,

but again, thank you for reminding me, mr. serhiy, of this column, a very cool column, where mr. friedman clearly wrote, that he really strongly advises mr. biden to leave the race, because he showed that unfortunately, well, that's all, you have to go, and like, he's a very cool dude and friedman has a very cool article about what, like, there's humanity now is on the cusp of just gigantic changes, there is an artificial... it will affect every person on earth and that young joseph biden would be a very cool person to lead all these changes, but unfortunately, not the biden that was, these are not my words , thanks for reminding me, that's what thomas friedman wrote in the new york times today, you know, he's one of the the coolest, probably american public intellectuals, so what can i say, i can only quote and agree with his words, well, besides the fact that he is one of the coolest democrats, in fact, he really supports biden, that is, he is not a person from the republic. two candidates,

let's see who will be in the real debate, which will take place in september 24th, let me remind you that in november the elections for the president of the united states of america will be held, the new owner of the white house should enter the residence on january 21st, when the 25th when the inauguration of the new president of the united states of america will take place, a reminder... friends, we are working live, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live, there, please subscribe to our pages, like this video and also take part in our poll: today we ask you about whether you believe that trump is capable of ending the war in ukraine, because he talked a lot about this ability and about the possibility of ending this war, including during debates so, on youtube , please write yes, no, or your own opinion in the comments under the video. if you're watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote. if you believe that trump is capable of ending the war in ukraine, 0.800-211-381, not

0800-211-382, all calls to these numbers. are free, vote at the end of the program , we will tally up the results of this vote, and while the united states of america and the democrats, republicans are determined, or will be determined by their presidential candidates of the united states of america, a potential candidate for the presidency of ukraine was drawn, well , at least in an interview with ksenia sabchak, oleksiy aristovych stated that he will run for office in the next elections in ukraine, right away. aristovych gave three interviews in the last week, and these interviews appeared in russian media and on and they were all given by good russian so-called ksenia sabchak, who is close to the putin family, ekaterina gordeeva, dmitry bykov, in an interview to

the russian blogger bykov, aristovych spoke in favor of freezing the war in ukraine current line. front, let's listen to what aristovych said, the council, freezing along the line, advice freezing along the current line of fire, turning the peace summit into negotiations on collective security and holding elections in ukraine, he has no chance in ukraine anymore, that's it, the issue is closed, technically it's it can be done very simply, it's the olympics, macron is begging with the chinese to cease fire during the olympics, from july 15. conditionally and until august 10, one and a half months not to shoot, after that it will be very difficult to start shooting again, believe me, the majority both in russia and ukraine will be against the resumption of fire, and neither putin nor zelensky can ignore this opinion, and neither putin nor zelensky can ignore this opinion. well, actually, today we are talking about aristovych, as a person who

is being actively promoted by russian bloggers, i said that ksenia sabchak also took an interview. to oleksiy aristofovich, what he said there, we will talk a little later, olya, is it clear that russia in this situation is betting, well, on the conditional zelensky 2:0, i don’t know, i call him anti-zelensky, but a person who will to run, as he says, for the presidency of ukraine, and it is clear that these interviews that they took during this week, they are not directed primarily at the russian audience, which , you see, there is, as it were, not... who is ready to go to the freezing war along the demarcation line and is generally ready to talk about something, they say there are adequate people in ukraine? well, you know, these are, well, first of all, these are the same russian propagandists, you just know, there is such an advanced detachment, such a shadow detachment of russian propagandists, well, what

an oppositionist ksenia sobchak, well, what is there baptism? on putin, or who is she there, well, that is, don't tell me that the other is the same gardieva, what is her husband or who is an employee of the russian intelligence community, that is, there are some rather strange connections, let's say directly, with this with this environment, actually, well , it's one of those facets of trying to push. somehow to ukraine, in order to induce capitulation, yes, that is it, and i would say that aristovych does not play the role of zelensky 2:0, but medvedchuk 2:0 here, because this is an attempt to find a candidate who would be pro-russian, but it did not work out with medvedchuk, because he simply caused disgust in ukraine, even in

his own camp, the pro-russian ones did not vote for him, well, they were not ready to vote. because he is simply repulsive on a physical level, he is very antipathetic, here they have found something new, they promote him, drag him out like this, i would not say that it was only aimed at an exclusively russian audience, these interviews are precisely aimed at the, well , let's say, such, you know, still russian-speaking audience that exists in ukraine, in russia there is a tendency to exaggerate the size. this the electorate and the size of this audience, they are constantly fooling themselves by thinking that this is a huge part. on the ukrainian population, and again they seized power in banderivka, that is, they evaluated zelenskyi's victory in such a way that the pro-russian forces finally won, and

then the people of banderivka somehow seized power, how they seized power after that, well, it's a mystery, but that's what it is, this they are preparing such a candidate again, they believe that this is the last time pro-russian forces will win in ukraine, they will then simply surrender ukraine russia, and yes, this is the candidate they are preparing. are completely conscious, it is not necessary to assume that this is not happening, moreover, as i have already said, now the same medvedchuk, who no longer shines as directly as some person who claims to be a geulaiter here, but rather as such a more shadowy person , well, after all, he already has a russian passport, but he has now been given large budgets for the actual work with ukraine, this is directly for him again, and he is actively working. i do not even rule out that he works with the same arestuvych, perhaps that is why these interview, that is, i don't know, for sure, but it can be assumed that there are some connections, so i think it's medvedchuk 2:0, with everyone

around him now they will try to destroy the eyes, you know the shortcomings from opzzh , from sharia, which has completely burned out, from all these murky pro-russian forces, will now be roaming around arresting, bohdan, you are on... your youtube channels . join these youtube channels subscribe marina danyliuk yarmalayeva and bohdan butkevich host these two channels, you actively and painstakingly analyze in general what arestovych is doing, what statements he makes, these three big interviews that came out for him for the russian public and for the ukrainian pro-russian public. they testify that he has already secured support, is he still trying to sell himself to the russians, or have the russians in some certain way already seen this

niche in which he can be arrested or, of course, that opzzh is prohibited, sharia is prohibited, and there how many 20 % or there 15%, all the same, the people who chose these political projects and voted for these projects are still there somewhere in ukraine. well, i 'll say this, i won't lie, i didn't watch this interview, because i've had this bastard for a long time, well, i don't know, to be honest, well, i just don't know how to explain it to you viewers here, just watch there are people whose voice and facial expression alone give me a gag reflex, i don’t know, i watched as a child, as my parents’ generation watched, all kinds of kaspirovs there you know some malanovchuma there. in front of you

is a real swindler, here is a swindler, sorry for the russian word, there is no other way to say it, this is a swindler, and well, i just want to say a big hello to all those ukrainian politicians who made it possible for this swindler to become what he became , to get a podium, especially to president zelenskyi, of course, a huge thank you, but to be honest... i paid for it, as a real crook should, look, i'll be honest, i'm very happy that russia wants to give money to aristovych, i'll explain why, i will not get tired of talking about this, that the russians, thank god, do not respect us, they really still consider us one nation, and that is very good, let them continue to think so, why, because when they begin to consider someone as a different nation, they begin to study it very meticulously, and i will tell you that it is not bad that they know how to get into the heads of the americans, the british, the germans, because they understand that these are other people, and, like, you have to seriously fight against them. as for us, they still think we're wrong version of the russians, and therefore every time

the russians try to impose something on us that they invented themselves, it turns out to be complete bullshit, as always, look at all the grant narratives of russian propaganda for the last 10 years since the 14th year, about the fact that we have a civil war, not a war, that we do not have a country, that ukraine is not a real country, there are no ukrainians, there is boo-boo-boo. russian language nothing happened, but nothing happened, why? because they really don't bother to study ukrainians for real, but instead, friends, what do they do brilliantly? they are brilliant at exploiting our mistakes, that is, where they see a pain point, oh, that's where they start to press with all their strength, and everything works out great for them right away, and look how soon our wonderful power gives a wonderful opportunity, here active action, mobilization begins, there will be crimea in 3 days. fits perfectly, so regarding aristovych, see if he has any audience, well, in a certain sense, of course

there is. but it is already peculiar, not ukrainian, according to i remember just the other day, another study of the rozmkov center came out, if my memory serves me right, oristovych, the level of rejection is 69 or anti-rating, it seems 70%, something like that, well, that is, almost 3/4 of people, understand this person is no one in ukraine anymore, no adequate person will accept him, can he have any supporters, they certainly can, just like any swindler, swindler... zlatana, well , there will always be some ram or lamb, i don't know how to correctly change from the word ram to take, sheep, probably, yes, which one i'll like it, it's pale, but honestly, if they decided that they will return aristovych to ukrainian politics, well, thank god, honestly, i'm much more afraid that russia will someday have the sense to put a non-public pro-russian person, a person who, on the contrary, is not will publicly shout that she

is russian, that she... came from ukraine and so on, no, but quietly find such a, you know, type of goat, and he will not shout that let's make friends from russia and so on, well that is , what is actually always very here but never russia did not know how to make soft power, if they are really going to invest, i will repeat varistovych, i am not sure, by the way, friends, that this is so, because look, well, you must not forget that all this disgusting blogger, all this latin he gave an interview to the dogs there or to whomever there, well , of course they all cooperate, of course, that is, when it is necessary... but they are still bloggers with us, they need views, and aristovych is very good at the russian public, because he pushes them what they want listen, now he is just like a real crook, a broadcaster, he just changes, you know, how to say, the target audience, which he breeds for money, then he bred ukrainians, it’s just a pity, unfortunately, the authorities gave him the opportunity to do it on behalf of the authorities, let's not forget, by the way, about this direct crime committed

by zelenskyi and his entourage, who invited this... creature to work for the second time during a large-scale invasion, let me remind you, but now he is working for a russian audience, to be honest, at all i don't quite believe that they are going to bet on aristovych, because well, well, who is aristovych, i'm sorry, it's, no, it's clear what you can tell me now, well , you could say the same about zelenskyi, no, you can't, because zelenskyi is not aristovych , please excuse me, even when he was still there just as a manager. not the most successful in the territory of the former cis, so to speak, let's say so, artistic, a kind of showbiz artistic group, which was really very successful, it's not a question of what kind of content they made, they were successful, that's why i wouldn't even compare him with zelensky anyway, he's just a crook, sorry, so it's not that i should underestimate him, but just look, you know how i'm the same, when

everyone is grabbing, that's how it is there... well, mr. portnikov broke it, mr. portnikov, handsome, well done, respected and attentive, but i believe that every time a ukrainian public intellectual or anyone starts talking to these old, sorry, whores, we will already lose, it's one thing when our artists and musicians go to cannes and there prove that there is a ukrainian vision, why talk about the topic with old whores, same with aristovych, you see, every time we give him some additional value... this chepushila, on the contrary, is very happy and thinks that he is very cool, he thinks oh class, another fool will sign up, i'll cut his money, honestly, the best way to fight against this shit is to just throw it out of the public space, well, we can't, you know, we have ours anyway with you colleagues who cannot live a day without to put some raunchy shit on the air, every time i want to look into the eyes of these guest editors and editors and ask,

how much will you be? this is a lot of stuff to drag on our air, you should finally learn english, i don’t know, polish will learn, czech, how long will you drag russian crap here, stop doing it, aristovych, this applies first of all, because it’s not just russian crap, he is also a crook, just a crook, but perceive him, you know, as a bazaar catalog, and then everything will immediately fall into place, both with the goals of this creature, and for what is he doing, where is he doing it, for whom, don't take him as a public figure, he's a crook, a crook. it's just that he steals your money through your bags, and doesn't immediately go into his pocket, that's the whole difference. thank you, bohdan, olya, this, i would say, a political swindler, well, er, yes, such a concept, a political swindler, er, we will use, er, to what extent he has any opportunities at all, and how likely is it that that he can even claim to...