and from the reports that resulted from these tests, the second question is that from the point of view of a businessman, let's say, who understands the principles of supply, there must necessarily be competition between the several systems proposed for supply in order to e lower the cost of the offer, let's say, a package. that what is proposed in this package of proposals to increase so and so on, our proposal concerned precisely the supply of samples that will pass tests, in the future with the organization of production in ukraine, including there it was immediately possible start with the localization of the combat module of the tower and so on. unfortunately, we stopped at the fact

that the general staff did not introduce the specified systems into the need to conduct their tests, and thus this project stopped at this point, as we relate to the fact that the spaniards will be at their own expense, respectively, without any ukrainian component supply positively in terms of that... we will receive military equipment, as well as the fact that it is possible that this project will also be able to negotiate its localization, but for something must be done about this from our side, if we do nothing from the ukrainian side, then the spaniards are not interested in helping us in this. mr. vladyslav, thank you for the inclusion, thank you for the explanation. for what your company does for

the security and defense forces, let me remind you that it was the general director of the ukrainian defense equipment company vladyslav belbas, the company is engaged in the production of armored vehicles, ammunition, mortars for the needs of the security and defense forces, a number of agreements were made at the exhibition in eurosatter, what are we hopefully, will give an impetus to the expansion of the potential of private companies to provide security forces and defense with weapons and military. technique, these were the main conclusions based on the results of this day, then the broadcast will be continued by vasyl zima, so stay tuned to the spresso channel. thank you very much to serhii zhorets, thank you to his guest, we continue with a lot of interesting and important information ahead of you today i am waiting for you, i will briefly tell the economic results of the week, a review from oleksandr morshchyvka, who lost at the debate... or joseph biden, more about it

yuriy fizar will tell, expectations from the euro playoff matches from yevhen postokhov, and there will also be guests, today we will talk about strange decisions regarding the license for fuel production in ukraine for people connected with russia, what is treason or what to call it, well, also about the day of the constitution, but a little later, literally in a few moments, now i will ask you to join the gathering. i continue to believe that this week, if not during my time on the air, then... during the work of the air of my colleagues, but by the end of the week we will close this collection. we have left in fact, to collect 53 00 uah for a minibus for our soldiers who work in the solidarsky and zaporizhzhia directions. this minibus is needed to quickly deliver mobile repair teams to the gray zone or to the contact line, where it is necessary to urgently repair armored vehicles, whether it is a tank, an infantry fighting vehicle, or an armored personnel carrier, and the repair teams are on foot. they will go for a long time under

enemy fire, and we understand that this is a great risk for people's lives, and it is time, and time in war is of great importance, because again after all, a tank repaired in time can destroy the enemy, can cover infantry, can cover other means of armored vehicles, an armored personnel carrier can transport our troops, again under the cover of armor, and not in a clear field to move, and an infantry fighting vehicle can also inflict fire damage the enemy while moving and transport infantry, in fact, when can it be done faster? it is much better, because this is the life of the military, and again, this is the time, and it is for this minibus that we are collecting, we need uah 630,00, actually for this week, for this week we were able to collect 73 hryvnias, because we started this week with 504 thousand, and now we have 577 thousand, you are really great guys, we have 53, even a little less hryvnias left, i think that today we will be able to raise a sufficient amount, well, if i believe that we will raise, but even if it happens that we do not... during our

broadcast, there is still saturday, there is still sunday, and i think that my colleagues will finish this story and the military will be able to get the necessary money for the purchase of a minibus, thank you very much. thanks again for the fact that you continue to trust us despite everything, and we continue to work in the interests of the armed forces of ukraine and the defense forces. andriy magera, with us, lawyer, ex-deputy chairman of the central election commission of ukraine. mr. andriy, i congratulate you, and i also congratulate you, and glory to ukraine on the day of the constitution of ukraine. glory to the heroes is also mutual, thank you. well, soon it will be 30 years since the constitution of ukraine was adopted. i am reading today. a lot of betrayals, i 'll call it that, or maybe it's the thoughts of people with the taste of betrayal that the constitution already has violated it by those who could not and did not want to, and violated it because of this power, and now they will say again that this is you, so you are sitting, occupying power, criticizing, no, i will not criticize anyone, i understand that time war requires

non-standard solutions, and if we talk about the basic law, and now the rights and duties of citizens, they are ensured, and for... how long is this constitution, it is relevant in time of war, and what are the issues, perhaps, which are not settled , and had to be settled, due to which certain collisions again arise. be affection. the current constitution was adopted, as is known, in 1996, that is, at the time when the states neighboring us in the north and east adopted constitutions due to the storming of the parliament building. the building of the parliament due to the opposition breaking down, due to the elimination of the opposition, the ukrainian constitution was adopted within the walls of the parliament, that is, by the people's deputies in the most legitimate way, this is a very important moment. perhaps this is the reason

that the civil and political rights and freedoms enshrined in our constitution they were obviously fixed in far from the worst way, and this was recognized by many experts. international institutions, in particular the venice commission. if we are talking about a specific period of time, and about a state of war, it is quite obvious that in the conditions of a state of war , certain civil and political rights and freedoms may be limited due to the fact that there is a war, the maximum concentration of the state is actually necessary to repel resistance, to repel attack by the enemy, so all this is understandable, along with that... the constitution, even under the conditions of martial law, prohibits the introduction of the death penalty, for example, guarantees the right to honor and dignity, the same guarantees remain, regarding, apparently , after the end of the war, we will be forced to move towards the adoption of

a new constitution, whatever the constitution the year 1996 was not progressive in its time, but time certainly passes and the constitution is somewhat outdated. well, it cannot keep up with the times, for example, in relation to local self-government, in relation to new rights and freedoms that have appeared in our digital era, so over this will all have to work, but only after the end of martial law, by the way, and i remember very well, then i worked as a journalist, you remember which tv channel, but it was 2003, can you correct me, i think 2003 year, if... not yet 2004, but when they tried to change the constitution under medvedchuk, when they actually wanted to make kuchma the prime minister, with powers, well actually change the form of government and actually extend kuchma's power for an indefinite period, and then i remember such were the expectations, i was sitting in the press box at that time

on the second one there in the hall of the parliament and when they voted, i think three or four votes were missing, and well, 300 votes were not missing , and then this attempt to... change the constitution, actually rewrite it and change, well, the form of government by and large, failed . then there were certain moments when we moved to the ukrainian house, there were also attempts, that is, attempts, i am leading to the point that there were attempts to make a different form of government under someone, my question now is quite practical, because you know, we are not we know when the war will end, we do not know how many people will be in ukraine, what resources we will have, what opportunities we will have losses, how much we will be... demoralized or on the contrary motivated, it is difficult, difficult to say what agreements will be signed, what peace initiative will be approved, again, but do you think it is relevant or not the issue of really turning ukraine into a parliamentary republic, not a

parliamentary presidential republic, actually what is there, let's say in italy or in germany or in austria, for example, won't it change anything and... it shouldn't be done, because again, a lot of people will come to power that we haven't seen, a lot of people who were in power will disappear forever , there will be some uncertainty, and this future will have to be shaped. or a change in the form of state government to a different one, well, maybe i am confused somewhere in the terms, please forgive me, i am not a lawyer, but will it be relevant, or will it not come to that, and we will have a president, a parliament, a government, as executive power, and nothing it is not necessary to change it, it will not change anything for the better, but it is worth emphasizing that under any modern democratic form of government, whether it is parliamentary, presidential or mixed, there are also presidents. these forms, three forms of government, are actually the two

defining the factors that distinguish them are the following factors: the way the government is formed, in a presidential republic it is done by the president, without the intervention of the parliament, in a parliamentary form of the republic it is done by the parliament, the president is usually elected by the parliament, and his function is only on a lot as for the mixed form, it combines the elements of both and the second feature, a very fundamental feature: in a presidential republic , the distribution of power is very strict, the president cannot dissolve the parliament, the president cannot submit bills to the parliament, instead, the parliament does not interfere with the executive branch of power, in a parliamentary republic , the powers of both the parliament and the government are mixed, and it is sometimes unclear where the prerogative of the parliament ends. and where does the prerogative of the government begin, and how does it not it looks strange, precisely in a parliamentary

republic, the parliament is the weakest institution, in a presidential one it is the strongest, because the president, but the parliament performs a key function, it forms the government, and the government represents certain parties by and large, so you are actually very correct i was brought to a good point, very important, why, because indeed the parliament forms the government a... but later, as soon as the government is formed by the parliament, the government begins to dominate the same parliament, headed by the prime minister, every time will be to blackmail the parliament, give us the government's program, about approval of the government's trust issue, these are a lot of things that he will practically blackmail the position of the parliamentarians, if you do not vote, there will be parliamentary elections, that is, there is such an interdependence of the government and the parliament. but i would like to emphasize that the parliamentary model will function successfully in the

state in which political parties are developed, where there is a high level of political culture, because very often, often in the parliamentary model, not one party has the majority of mandates in the parliament, and several, they are forced to negotiate, these are coalition agreements, agreements, this is a very difficult process, well, the main thing is that i am simple. that these parties should have, let them be unacceptable for someone, acceptable for someone, but at least that these parties should be in the legislative field, not be traitors there, as we had one block, we had, well, conditionally, but they had at least some history, let's say there are parties that have a history in ukraine, at least some, and you understand what kind of party it is, well, we have a moment, but please, that you concluded the opinion, and here i would like to send such a key message that any form of government, presidential, parliamentary or mixed, needs certain... rules, compliance with these rules. if we do not follow these rules, then

no matter what form of government we introduce, believe me, it will not work effectively, and this means that we need to move towards a state of law, after all, raise the level of legal awareness, there is no other way, otherwise this is a rollback to russia and belarus, we must to understand that we will no longer have a third option, this is a very important point, then there really should be a social contract. and the agreement of the political elites, well, we will have new elites formed after the war, that is clear, everything can be changed there, but again the question is what society will grow to and what it will grow to, what state it will be in, it such a constitution and form of government and coexistence will be formed, but only time will tell, thank you very much for joining us, thank you for your comments, andriy magera, lawyer, as deputy chairman of the central election commission of ukraine, here i am reading a post, we have a chat here and he writes, the viewer is the viewer andriy, and this is just like franz

kavka josef k, andriy a, well, divap is to discuss what to discuss, if there is no parliament, and what parliament, there is none, in fact we have a parliament, you know, i always try to slow down any betrayals, because if we did not have a parliament, it would be, well, history would be different, believe me, history would be different, the parliament in ukraine is imperfect, not ideal, but it is, and already is repeatedly. in history, this parliament very often saved ukraine, when yanukovych was fleeing by highways, fired upon, you remember this story, the parliament then saved ukraine, so let's not pretend that we have it all. no, not perfect, well, but who is perfect among us, yes, now i'll take a second, let's talk about another topic, here we will try to disperse with treason, and maybe taras zagorodniy will stop this treason. political technologist taras zagorodny is with us, mr. taras, i congratulate you, have a good day, happy constitution day, after all anyway, although we have a different topic, but we have 11 minutes, and there will definitely be enough time, i would like

to ask you, will it be necessary to change the constitution or the form of government or change anything after the war? or actually, if we prepare a little there somewhere, then we will go further on this constitution, in fact, a very cool constitution. no, look, this constitution was made by medvedchuk so that the state power in the country was dysfunctional, well, by mykhailo mykhailo syrota, the father of the constitution, no, the changes are in the 1996 year, 2004, the 96 year, by the way, is quite good was the constitution, the only thing that was a problem was to expand. the powers of the parliament to simplify the impeachment procedure, then the removal of the president, then they returned it again under yanukovych, they were not like that, look, i am a supporter, i am a supporter of the american model, where there is a president who answers and heads, heads the executive power, we have a problem, what is the problem in our state that people elect the president by universal suffrage,

and he is responsible for everything that happens in the country, the prime minister is something incomprehensible. a person who is not chosen by some incomprehensible deputies, and we have a built-in confrontation between the president and the prime minister, and this, i am sure, was done on purpose, medvedchuk deliberately pressured us to make the government dysfunctional, so i am a supporter of the position of prime minister - cancel the minister, expand the powers of the parliament so that it has a simplified... impeachment procedure, the parliament should have, the parliament should have investigative commissions in order to have more powers, including for investigations and so on, then we get more- less functional model, because otherwise we will always stick to this ineffective model, which does not

give the state the opportunity to move forward, well , well, in any case, again, i ask you... what is the state of society in which it will be, what is the point it will grow up, it will understand what it will experience, and how it will perceive itself, well , the constitution will certainly be like that, it is always an expression of what we are ready to live in, such a social contract, it must be, if there is no such contract, then there will be something that has already happened in ukraine once, these are maidans, revolutions, and well, not a violent overthrow of the government, but at least some very quick ones. and painful changes that could be made much simpler, well, today i saw this news and immediately told my colleagues, i say, let 's talk about it, because it needs to be discussed, here it is, well, on the face of it, betrayal, so mnovinsky's company , this is the pilot from st. petersburg who came to ukraine, is an active supporter of the moscow church in ukraine, was with yanukovych for a long time, is

an oligarch, has a business in ukraine, even was once a journalist at the opening of one of his plants in vinnytsia. but his company, under sanctions, novinskyi and yaermalayev returned licenses for the use of ukrainian subsoils, the state geological and nader service, implemented the corrective decision of the nsdc on clarification of sanctions, restored the validity of special permits for the use of subsoils, in particular gas extraction, to the companies of vadym novinskyi and vadym yarmolayev, forbes ua wrote about it. please explain how it is, what it is, well, look, we don't know the invoice, that's all it is not excluded that we... call these companies nevinsky's, but on paper they are nevinsky's, there are no connections with him, i do not rule it out, because, well, if so, then it may be a strange decision, because, or why, for example, they are not confiscated, if sanctions were introduced against him there, yes, if there are specific grounds and so on, well, let's see,

i'm there, i haven't seen the documents, it's hard for me to say, and there are strange decisions, and... .otherwise , our recently reformed high anti-corruption court suddenly lifted the arrest in fact, from the property of mr. firtash in obolgazy, and they almost returned to his property again, well, it seems that this issue has already been resolved and it is again in state ownership, i see a farm, but we see that even the so-called reformed courts also, for some reason , you know, have such a ... feelings for different citizens who are interconnected with different structures, which are not always loyal, well, but here i am reading, it is now devono. here i have this decision on geosoil, so the effect of special permits was stopped due to sanctions against the ultimate beneficiaries, the owners of the company, well, actually navinskyolaeva, well, and

then she was simply i lead to the point that, well , this news is already a day old, it was made public, well, a decision, an addendum to the order of june 26, that is, this news appeared two days ago , well, what do you think, maybe it’s worth explaining to people, because again, later they will say that journalists are dispersing treason or something else, well, yes... how do you write nadra-info here, a profile publication with a link to a certain application from the state general directorate, that the ultimate beneficiaries of the companies, which is novinsky, which was under sanctions, special permits were returned, maybe this is a communication issue again, look, there is a question again, i do not rule out that there are no final beneficiaries of these people now, so what, what, what , it could be related , and again, i am starting from this version, because it is logical, if there are... specific, specific beneficiaries, they are confirmed, including by sanctions, in this case, and suddenly it changes, well, then

the excess of authority on the part of, where these nador, yes, but i do not rule out that again, why in i have such a version, i do not rule out that there are simply no such final beneficiaries, i know, what else i would like to ask you about, but again... without dispersing, but here there is nothing to dispel all the betrayals, everyone understands , that the situation is such that it is necessary to discuss things, as they say, with a cool head, this next wave of mobilization, of course, it will end at a certain stage, because there will be a decline, the mobilization process will continue, as it happens, someone removes someone from the register, on sorry, people die, new people come, but it's not something and when we can say, well, when the action ends, the consequences. the actions of the law on mobilization are active and certain things will be formed, normalized and stabilized, and we will see what we have in terms of mobilization, business,

enterprises, and taxes. when will it be possible to say with what ukraine will enter the autumn and winter, precisely in terms of money, taxes, opportunities, provision of the army, because it is important, and in other things, so that we understand where we are and what we still need we can, conditionally speaking, what reserve will we have for resistance even then the enemy well, who is also looking for resources, looking for reserves, but today i read that 30,000 illegal migrants, these are not migrants , but migrants were used by russia in the war against ukraine, 30,000, six brigades, please look at this, these are the priorities of the state first of all, where to look for money, when the minister of finance came out about a year ago and said that 8 billion was located abroad, which agro-defenders took away, that is... the question is why, why the minister of finance, who formally heads, including tax, by the way, himself former taxman is there money in the state there is money in the state enough to close without

raising taxes enough to close without raising taxes this is a price fight that basically crumbles with the same tax yes if that's not enough well, reduce, reduce the vat refund for the export of raw materials, for example, grain, iron ore, and so on. further, i assure you, a lot of money will be found right away, and in order to stimulate processing in our state, as well as to have money, we now have only the defense industry as a priority, we only have the military industry should work now, this is a priority for our country, which will ensure, should work, what works for defense and what ensures, well, not the minimum, an acceptable life of citizens, yes, the communal sphere, there are also other transport logistics, wait, what? no, well, including, yes, but i, i am a supporter of the fact that we should limit the import of some goods that are not specifically related to the war, for example, why does ukraine

still import prestigious cars into the country, the same currency is exported abroad, why is it such is necessary, or excuse me, in the 23rd year, 1 billion dollars worth of alcohol was imported, why do we need french or other wines in such quantities, or elite wines, or the military, and so on. and it hurts you, and not only the citizens, then it will somehow come out, which will be enough for the army, very, very briefly, but well, we literally have a minute, but the european court lifted the sanctions from the russian oligarch pumpyansky, please explain, how is that a kind of countdown has begun for the russian oligarchs, which turns out not to be the case they insulted putin for no reason, and in general , they insulted him in vain, but... they said that, well, you are a good man, well, look, first of all, we do not know the circumstances of the case, i do not exclude that pumpyansky said that he is not a russian oligarch , like the majority of russian

oligarchs,... for some reason now they say that they are israeli oligarchs in general, so i do not rule out that the lawyers there did a good job, i think that one of the good lawyers, he has resources, he could present evidence, for example, foreign citizenship, that he has no relation to russia, i don't exclude, or could do some favor to the states, which contributed to the fact that he was still removed from the sanctions. in conclusion, i listened to vitaly portnikov in the morning at fagin’s place, where he said that philip kirkorov also appears, according to his information, he has a passport from a country in the european union, he owns real estate there, and it is generally strange why he is still sitting in russia and how they say, he falls on his knees before putin, that is why people in russia have many passports, real estate, and managed to earn a lot of money, and bloody ones at that number, thank you very much, it was taras zahorodnyi, a political technologist, but literally in a moment news on express. good evening, we are from ukraine. yes, well

, we are starting with the news, but now i will still update, because the information regarding enemy attacks on the territory of our state has been updated, and i have to start with the news that has just arrived. the russians launched a missile attack, launched a missile attack on the city of dnipro, a nine-story building was damaged, several floors were destroyed, and there are already wounded. well , again, we will monitor the information from the dnipro emergency services, from the local authorities and to inform you about the search and rescue operations that will continue at the scene, well , now let's go according to plan, there are already six injured in tserkuny in kharkiv region , a private house and an outbuilding are on fire , and also an extended zone, i just literally also read the news, the expanded evacuation zone of people from kharkiv oblast

is forced. evacuation due to the fact that the enemy is expanding, as they say, the geography of its strikes and possible offensive actions on the territory of kharkiv region. russians in the afternoon attacked bilozerka in the kherson region, the regional military administration informs that a 45-year-old woman was injured, a residential building and a car were damaged. well, the enemy also attacked donetsk region, the settlement of new york, there, unfortunately, were killed as a result of the enemy attack. well , the situation is critical, you can't call it otherwise, the thermal power plant is completely destroyed and cannot be restored, said the head of the ivano-frankivsk regional military administration, svitlana onyshchuk, in particular, she noted that the plant was attacked 12 times. due to the destruction of the power plant, burshtyn may be left without heat and hot water in winter. the city has already turned to the government and the ministry of community development, territories and regeneration for help. there, they agreed on the allocation of six boiler houses for social facilities and for...

the population. ukraine will present a clear and detailed plan for ending the war. it will be ready by the end of this year - said president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi. also , according to him, in the near future we will announce a detailed vision. that is, we are ukraine. of energy, food security and exchanges. i mean the prisoners. well, the russians took not only prisoners, but also civilians as hostages and captives. besides that, as i told you, it's not all up to us, we have production in terms of technology, drones, rebs, artillery, it's really increasing because we have to be strong on the battlefield, because if you're weak, it's not because that someone wants to fight, we didn't want it to begin with, and now nobody wants it, we just want peace,

but we have to... be strong, and that's why...