since society already began to change, the quarter - no, they began to get into many scandals, and they cannot understand, and where these scandals come from, it was still so good, well, let's listen to elena, what she said, there was no such thing as we lived somehow separately from the whole country, you know, because humor, it was a bit of a reflection, our humor was a reflection of social events and flight. these events, then in life we ​​did not live in the paradigm that we do something, well, you know, i even i even, well, it's always like that for me it is surprising, well, that is, transferring responsibility to the past for what is happening now is possible, but there were many other events of a political, defensive nature, and... well, if

elena already spoke about the political nature, then i will also remind you that in the 95th quarter, they also engaged in frank political slander, forgive me, because they appeared on ihor kolomoiskyi's channel, and all mr. kolomoiskyi's competitors received, received a portion, so to speak, of pin critics, sometimes quite cynical from the quarter, and you remember. .. was sure that the peak of cynicism, when they made fun of valeria gontareva's house, which burned down, they laughed at it, and now elena talks about some political points, and very often, by the way, and the 95th quarter, and there is a diesel show, for example, this show is humorous, emerging authors, who are exposed to more and more criticism now, they absolutely do not take it, they ... i think

that it is either some senseless attacks, or it is hate speech, or it is some kind of political order, that is, you see , even from this passage we can see that elena kravets absolutely i am convinced that we have been criticized for the past 2-2 years, well , there was no such thing before, that is, but the question is that it was normal, and since the 14th year, since 2014, there has been a lot of criticism of the 90s. . quarter, you can remember all these cases, quite loud, scandalous, and about ebonite sticks, how they joked about people, about students who were beaten on the maidan, they, there were a lot of disgusting jokes, really not self-ironic, but disgusting, and they as if they don't remember anything about it, they think that it's okay, it's nothing there was no criticism, and we can also listen now to olena kryvets. takes criticism

towards herself and towards the show in which she worked, and she, by the way, compared herself to gladiators, so that gladiators enter the arena, and they do something, they pass through under the blood, and the people who sit in the stands, they can only show the top of their finger or the bottom of their finger there, and they don't do anything, and here we are... we do something and that's why we get criticized, well let's listen to this, it's an important thing when you realize that you author, you are the author of your life, well, you write your book of life, it seems to me that these are very important things, when you don't have your own meanings, you start looking for them in another life, when you don't have the courage to enter the arena, you start.. . criticize those who do it,

when you don't have the strength to get up from the sofa and stop being a sofa critic, you start looking for where to direct this criticism, and it seems to get easier for you, but it's not. well, as i have already concluded for myself that olena kryvyts is absolutely not breakthrough in this sense, she will obviously not understand what is wrong with these jokes, and by extension neither will her colleagues, why this applies to us and to you too, because the quarter continues its work, they are now performing together with the women's quarter, such a great team, it's called the only quarter, and when you see, they continue to be criticized because they continue to not understand anything about the changes in society and they resort again and again to these um... such

pro-russian jokes to offensive jokes, we can recall the case of , we his they also discussed it on the air, you know it, for example, about the girl from siskadovsk, yes, who... didn’t know how to speak ukrainian, she’s such a caricature fool, but that’s how they showed people from occupied skadovsk, obviously, when they wrote this joke, they forgot to see that skadovsk was occupied, and it was absolutely disgusting, then people from kherson region were outraged, and the mayor of kherson, skadovsk, seems to be outraged, and even after that in... the participants of the quarter did not understand anything, they also started it interpret everything as some kind of political attacks, as some kind order, and that is, i once again conclude that this is some kind of lack of empathy, because people simply cannot understand that they are inappropriately

insulting people with their jokes, who are now, well, not for nothing, in the occupation, well, and also completely recently we saw a case of how the quarter mocked... an employee of the rivne tsc, and here, you know, this is the story, they constantly raise questions that they respect the military, they collect for the military, they are grateful to the defense forces and so on, but well the tsk is, well, in their opinion, obviously not the military, so they ridiculed one of the workers and thereby faced criticism again, and again they did not understand the obviousness of all this, that they are doing it wrong, and therefore... we, well, i, again, sum it up by saying that we will continue to see in the telethon, in particular, and on various platforms, the show of the 95th quarter, the participants of which cannot understand what circumstances they are in now, how

society has changed, and they will then, perhaps without realizing it, promote some absolutes their messages are harmful, because they just don't understand, and olena kravets... is constantly exposed to scandals, and here i don't like this one more moment, that we have a part of public people who quite consciously now admit that they used to do something not so, for example, they were infantile there, or they were not interested in politics, they performed for russians on russian platforms, they believed, for example, nadya dorafeeva said that i thought it was cool to be apolitical, they, those who are sincerely normally stated, they received great... support from society and continue to work, and those of our celebrities who begin to lie, manipulate, who begin to talk about the fact that they are being attacked, that ukrainian society is somehow not like that, this is very frequent and very harmful from my point of view in view of the thesis, which is repeated time and time again by our

show business stars, mostly those who blame ukrainian society, they say that it is sick, that it is somehow emotional, that we are all somehow aggressive, in fact it is not so, just like that... society reacts to lies, and this it's absolutely normal, you just need to stop lying, that's the point, but - olena kryvets, i'm taking her as an example, she's already, i don't know, been born for criticism many times over the years, most recently in an advertising campaign, like you remember, the brand that decided the brand of underwear that released, began to release underwear for military personnel, more comfortable. they made a campaign when the face of elena kryvets is on the board, and she says a quote from a military servicewoman, that's how it is now, and they couldn't understand why not put a photo military serviceman, yes, why, and here

olena kryvets, and this company was criticized, but neither the company nor olena kryvets paid attention to it, and now they have reached the point... that the criticism intensified even more, and they finally had to apologize to the company, especially when the girls, military personnel said that all these quotes were inconsistent, they were not asked for permission to use them, well, there was also a scandal with the show of elena kravets, quiet evening, now we can watch different excerpts, this show is on the channel the state house, for which you allocated 33 million, i here... the show wasn't like that, of course, three shows should be recognized as the 95th quarter, there the authors tried to do something good, something good, to talk about culture, even, but olena kryvets finally discovered ukrainian culture for herself, but the question is , that the show was not popular, the show olena kryvets was not suitable for

this format as a presenter, because this format is such a late night show or a late night show, i don't know, there is a necessary feeling. there was no impromptu sense of humor and that is why she was criticized, they say that the president's girlfriend got it. such without having any ability to do it, but finally i want to say about once again to explain to you that the people who work in the quarter will not change for the most part because they do not understand why they have to change, very recently one of the actresses, iryna soponaru, who speaks in the women's quarter, she came to youtube to alina dorotiuk, to the popular youtube channel, and here she is also a presenter. asked her, well, what do you think about the criticism of all these jokes of yours, especially the joke about

siskadovsk. let's hear what iryna has to say answered for some reason, these previous years, no one touched the quarter, i understand where the legs grow from, maybe someone from the audience does not understand, so i will say it out loud, this is a political order, because we have a presidential election on our nose, and someone is so eager for power , that this quarter is already ready to discredit from all sides, well... i don't understand how it is possible not to see the connection between this, between these two, you know, events, that's why i don't accept my account, and i advised, of course it's hard not to accept it, because ira got a lot of bumps and that's it some activists here and there, listen, it was a very funny number then, it went very well, everyone kind of laughed, for two days everyone laughed, and then two days later they remembered that there was a reason to attack the apartment.

well, i think you understood everything, i think you, our viewers, understood that the 95th quarter is hopeless for a long time, we did a lot of broadcasts about it, well, we're doing another one, because it's all prod'. and you know, i really hope that shows like the 95th quarter, like the diesel show, they just go out of existence, or will become very marginal, because it's just, it's just, as they say, not in time, that is, such jokes are no longer possible, there was hope that they would change, but it simply breaks down, in such and such interviews, when we understand that for any criticism, we will simply be told that this is a political order and everything is okay here. they didn't mention poroshenko, they like to mention him at every

opportunity. well, now we are moving on to state cinema, the topic is no less scandalous, because you know, if you are with us, if you watch our broadcasts, then state cinema since the 19th year, when maryna kuderchuk came to manage there, she was exposed to constant criticism not only from the film community, but from a wider audience, and when the attacks of the state cinema on the dovzhenka center began, then... well, i did not expect that this scandal would go so far outside the film bubble and they would start to be outraged by it to everyone , people who were never interested in ukrainian cinema, especially, or the dovzhenko center, and now we have a situation with the film support council, as i said at the beginning of our program, this is a council, this is a body that determines which tapes will win which the tapes will receive state funding, and accordingly, what films we can watch, we

will be able to watch in a year, two or three years, and andriy kotlyar is on our direct line, the producer, andriyu, can you hear me, congratulations, yes, i hear well, well, this is our song, good and new, we constantly talk about it on our broadcast, and there is a letter about it in particular. yes, another letter from the ukrainian film community with demands and with demands, in particular , to monitor how transparent it will be, the elections of new members of the council for state support of cinema will take place, please explain please, why, why are there any suspicions that this can all happen opaquely? well, in general, the management of the state cinema and in general the people who, before... before the management of this central body of executive power

, have been discrediting the very idea of ​​state presence in the field of cinematography for many years, that is, starting long before the full-scale invasion from the time of kovid, ms. koderchuk shared her knowledge in the field of medical management and said that we should build more hospitals, instead of doing our job and defending... interests industry, as it was done by its colleagues all over the world, in europe, in particular, after the full-scale invasion, the situation, it's not even that... worsened, it became more visible, because the body that should have been on the edge of the process of cultural diplomacy, including the promotion of ukrainian cinema abroad, once again showed its inactivity, apathy, unprofessionalism, and actually film fans found themselves alone with all

the challenges connected with this, in many ways there is no reason. the ukrainian institute, which specializes in the promotion of ukrainian culture abroad, but in general , again, in the first, especially full-scale year, we relied more on ourselves, on specialized public organizations, which, unlike drzhkino, joined the process of providing assistance, consolidating the industry, those messages that we goto, well, with which we go out into the world and generally helped each other in strengthening. representation of ukrainian cinema, and all this time there was the council for state support of cinematography, which, unfortunately, instead of representing the interests of the entire community, establishing clear, transparent rules of the game, er, for many years worked in the interests of absolutely specific er businesses,

productions, interests and political agenda. in the 23rd year, by law, these gentlemen and ladies were supposed to have their powers terminated, well , they simply had a contract, in some incredible way derzhkino thought that it was obvious that their tenure in office was key to the defense capability of our country, and through the cabinet of ministers they advanced a decision to extend it term of activity of this state cinema council until the end of the state and it seems, another plus 6 months or something. the film community reacted to this, we went through a difficult process together with the union of cinematographers of ukraine, caring colleagues, the public at three levels of court, the first instance of appeal, the supreme court of cassation, and finally the supreme court of cassation,

the supreme court confirmed that the decision to extend the activities of the state cinema council . it is illegitimate, actually , this legal path took about a year, which we are now seeing at one of the meetings of the derzhkino council, where we saw we could to see yuriy gurbanov - this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business partner of andriy yermak, that is, such people, yes, absolutely , if in general, these people should have just left in the 23rd year. and instead of them , there should have been a transparent competition, they cannot be there twice , if there is such a big, big nuance, they cannot by law be in positions twice , and obviously this has become a problem for them or for the people whose interests they represent, now the community has consolidated, to me

it seems that this is the first time in recent years that when very different productions, which i don't know yet, competed with each other a few years ago. united in reaching some kind of fair social contract, which will make it possible to restore trust in the institution, and secondly, to promote the development of ukrainian cinema on an honest and transparent basis, at the request of the supreme court , derzhkino is now starting to hold the competition for the election of new board members, and the first of its stages is the election of a commission that will actually... vote for the members of the derzhkino board, and we see serious risks in the fact that derzhkino can conduct this stage non-transparently, in order to eventually form a commission of convenient controlled people, who will again elect

convenient, controlled people, who will vote as they say. and instead of the interests of the entire film community, they will present something, represent something of their own, in short, these are all really very difficult matters to explain, we want everything to be as honest and transparent as possible, we call for this in an open letter, we will call on the president, authorized representatives cabinet of ministers of ukraine, and in general, we emphasize once again: the money of the 2024 state budget should be sent to the armed forces of ukraine, because it seems impossible to distribute it honestly and transparently within the framework of the budget year. the state cinema as an institution needs a deep reset, the re-election of the head of the state cinema, its members and in general a dialogue about

how ukrainian cinema ended up, well, at the bottom, in fact, because in the following years , due to the inaction of this state body, we will not see major ukrainian releases. but if we will, then this there will be one, two or three paintings a year. four minutes, but i still have two important questions about, firstly, the demand to choose, well , the resignation of maryna kudarchuk, the appointment of a new head of the state cinema, there is an opinion that it does not matter, the figure of the head of the state cinema does not matter, because she is all one thing is controlled, and you can re-elect the same controlled person, they say no, what's the difference, well, i tell all skeptics that if you think like that. then you can climb into the death pit already, and it was not worth going, as many people told us that it is impossible to disrupt the distribution of these funds, there

were dozens of people, people's deputies, lobbyists, representatives who are closer and closer to the authorities, everything worked out, it worked out, thank god there is still an independent judicial system in ukraine, er, one way or another, what about justice, so... without pessimism, we have achieved serious, well, goals in the context of preventing this non-transparent distribution of funds, and perhaps the person of maryna kudarchuk herself, of course, she does not decide anything, but the very fact of this pressure and the fact that the community is ready for dialogue to find a person who will to work in the interests of the country, in the interests of cinema. it is obvious that maryna kuderchuk is not a subject, but... it is important for us to continue the pressure in order to eventually reach the figure that will suit everyone. andriy, in just two minutes, a question that worries me personally,

because it must be said for the sake of justice that part of the film community is more people who still make original films, it seems to me that, although not only really united, i do not saw such consolidation, but there are still other ukrainian cinematographers who are involved mainly... commercial cinema, which is in opposition to others, and they support state cinema more, and they constantly say, let's go to a dialogue, let's reconcile, let's all find a consensus, and is this dialogue possible, relatively speaking, there well , i always say to those of you who are in opposition to this body, and to those moviegoers who support it, that the worst thing that derzhkino did was not that they even distributed funds incorrectly. did not go international, but the fact that they divided ukrainian cinema, they created artificial eyes camps, who is here for us, who is here against us, this is the worst, it is obvious that we are all interested in

commercial, non-commercial, copyright, wide audience, we are all interested in the fact that ukrainian cinema happens, that it has big box offices, that they have big festival premieres and victories, oscars and so on and the like, it is clear that all these parties are ready for dialogue, simply. simply derzhkino has created conditions where a huge number of people are dependent on them, and these are unhealthy conditions, we should not be dependent on the here and now, go and there, i don't know, give bribes or make the movie we want, if we want sustainable development, we have to build a sustainable institution, no way. andriy, thank you, and we will follow your further actions, really ours... andriy kotlyar was on the air with us, producing 13, and i will say that i really support the opinion that our cinematographers

are simply doing the impossible now and just going to the courts are seeking some kind of justice, i have not seen this before, that is , all this is happening at the time of the full-scale invasion of this unification, i am very happy to see such a... consolidation, i hope that this consolidation will spread to an even larger audience, i still hope that the issue of state cinema will be resolved, but you know, there is an opinion that while this government in power, until we have new presidential and parliamentary elections, and until we have a new president, in principle the situation will be the same as it is, but again it is not hopeless, because we have a sufficiently active a community that is ready... to fight again and again for its rights and for injustice, so the current state cinema is uncomfortable enough to work and do

what they do. that's all for me... friends, i wish you a good saturday and a good weekend, see you next week. laughter, physical activity, sneezing. even during such a small load , urinary incontinence can make itself felt. feminost uuro helped me. due to the natural ingredients feminost uuro helps. should restore control over urination feminost uro - urination under control. anatomy of hate. putin and ukraine. nova the book of espresso tv presenter serhii rudenko. insight - first-hand information. behind the scenes of russian politics and events, which the author himself witnessed. unsuccessful attempts to change presidents, poisoning of political leaders of the ukrainian state, murder and bloody war.

i didn't know about all this in serhiy rudenko's book anatomy. putin and ukraine. search in bookstores of ukraine. turn on well - it's when everything is as you want. click and now you control the game. the bird and you are in a tv show. oh, what is needed. meg turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports. there are discounts, they represent. discounts on urolessan. 15% in pharmacies, plantain, pam, and eyes. oh, i remember. well, you see, even though they say that over the years our my memory is weakening, but i am attentive and remember everything. we take dr. tice's memo effect and feel the difference. the active substances of memo effect improve the functioning of the nervous system and contribute to the normalization of mental activity. memo effect by dr. ty improves memory and attention, helps to think. a new week on espresso, a weekly summary information and analytical program. a clear understanding of the key events of the past

week analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andriy smoly, every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. your place is waiting for you, the lights are left on, for dinner, what you love, a warm bed is made, there will be walks, swings and swimming, you are waiting for your streets. in

at school, in your church, because in your house they see dreams about you, you are always in front of their eyes, they cry for you, they pray for you, we did not give up, because we knew that you were already somewhere nearby. half the battle is knowing how hard it is to win, and we will do our best to embrace you as soon as possible. therefore, when you are at home, when we are together, we are more than a family, we are a nation united around you.

15th in ukraine, the news team talks about the main thing, for this moment, annayavamelnik is with you, i congratulate all espress viewers. heroic resistance. the ukrainian military rejected it russians from terni and yampolivka in donetsk region. the defense forces retook the positions and secured them - the press service of azov reports. the muscovites tried to storm the trenches, acted chaotically and without any plan, - the military emphasizes. suffered heavy losses of destroyed equipment.