operates in two directions, on kharkiv and kupinsky. information about the destruction of s-300 anti-aircraft missile systems has become more frequent in recent days. i understand that we have the same scheme. as in crimea, first knock out the radar, then hit the command post of the battery divisions, after that simply destroy the launchers, which do not see anything and are not controlled in any way. judging by that. that the 12-18th anti-aircraft missile regiments of the 31st air defense division of the enemy in the crimea began redeploying part of their forces and assets to belgorod direction, our actions in belgorod are very successful. the use of western, primarily long-range weapons opens a new window of opportunity for zais. if ukraine can destroy a sufficient number of air defense systems in the far zone, then at medium and high altitudes defenseless against.

allies' ballistic missiles will become russian military airfields, bases and so-called decision-making centers. the donbas realities were with you, see you soon. there are discounts that represent unbreakable discounts on memicar ics. 10% in travel, memory and savings pharmacies. vasyl's big broadcast zymy, my name is vasyl zyma, this is a big ether on the spresso tv channel, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, colleagues, we will talk about the most important things, two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component, serhiy zgurets, and what the world is alive, yuriy fizar is already in front of me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine, yuriy, good evening, to be aware

of economic news, time to talk about money during the morchivka war, field with me and sports news, i invite you to the conversation of evgeny tapukova, two hours in the company of our favorite presenters, about cultural news, alena chekchenina, our art watcher, is ready to say good evening to the presenters, who have become familiar to many, already next to me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemiliev, the leader of the crimean tatar of the people, contact us, mr. mustafa, i greet you, good day, events of the day in... two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening for espresso. verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion. the malice of the day with

the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhii rudenko from tuesday to friday from 20 to 22: bring victory closer, together with the central security service of the sbu. join one of the best special forces in the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite civilian specialists of various fields. experienced commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. fill out the questionnaire and choose the direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the csoa, sbu team. together we will write the history of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. friends, hello,

today we will talk again about state cinema, and again about what films we will watch in a year, two or three years, or at all, because, as you know, on our broadcasts, there is currently a fight around state cinema , around contests that have recently passed that can be recognized illegitimate, and all these tapes, then... their authors, who came to ask for money, may or may not be left without them, the situation is confusing, we will speak with andrii kotlyar and the producer of babylon 13, he is one of those who signed the letter on duty from the film community, this letter calls for careful monitoring of elections. the council for

state support of cinema is a cinema support body whose members actually determine which projects in the competition are given money and which are not, and as a result. mean what movies we will watch, that is, the members of the council, and they are in fact, they are the decisive people, i will say that the council that currently exists has been recognized as illegitimate, various trials have been going on for a year and a new council must now be chosen, and now a large part of our film community is concerned about whether this process will be legal at all, well, for now... we are waiting for andrii, we will talk about elena kravyts, this is also a rather serious topic from my point of view, because a lot of, you know, some scandalous moments happen in our show business, and first of all a full-scale invasion, i

it seems that this is a positive trend, although there is a popular opinion that tells us that we need to make less scandals, we need to fight less, but in the end i think that we... before the full-scale invasion, we really lacked this kind of heated discussion of our personalities we often discussed some russian bloggers there, well, olena kryvets gave an interview to the youtube channel conversation host serhiy lykhovida, and in this interview, in particular, she showed, in my opinion, an absolute lack of understanding, a lack of reflection on that, and what harm the jokes did. quarter, and she is its host in this interview, it was a very complementary interview, by the way, we have practically no interviews on youtube, such harsh, more critical, and very often different celebrities come to youtube bloggers, to somehow fight back, to show how

nice they are, and this is exactly what happened to olena kravets, the presenter asked her, saying, you know, you have a lot of questions about the fact that the 95th quarter, in which olena worked. for many years, in particular blurred the boundaries between ukraine and russia, what do you say about that, i want to say for myself that the 95th quarter was not only involved in this, because i had to watch their shows constantly and now i also have to watch for monitoring, and that is not the only thing, that they engaged in, as i see it, frank mischief, they did not just make jokes about the little russians, they not only ridiculed the ukrainian language, ukrainian culture, presented it through the prism of the russian point of view, calling it an ironic point of view, self-ironic, but agree that to laugh at yourself - it is one thing and it must be done certainly, but it should not be done the way

the russians do it and have always done it, in the quarter and by the way, in many there, on many series that are shown on our television, it happens... until now, this is exactly the image of a ukrainian in comedies, which we could see in various russian and soviet tapes there, and this still surprises me, and it surprises me that, frankly, olena kryvets still cannot understand what was wrong with the jokes of the 95th quarter , despite the fact that during the full-scale invasion, since society had already begun to change, quarter - no, they started getting into... a lot of scandals, and they can't understand, and where these scandals come from, it was still so good, well, let's listen to elena, what did she say? it wasn't like we lived somehow separately from the whole country, you know, because humor was a bit of a reflection, our

humor was a reflection of social events and political events, then in life we ​​didn't live in the paradigm that we were doing something. well, you know, i even, i even, well, it always surprises me so, well, that is, the transfer of responsibility for the past, for what is happening now, it is possible, but there were many other events of a political, defensive nature, well, if elena already spoke about the political nature, then i will also remind you that in the 95... quarter they were also engaged in frank forgive the political scumbags already, because they appeared on igor kolomoiskyi's channel and all mr. kolomoiskyi's competitors received, to put it mildly, received a portion

of pin critics, sometimes quite cynical from the quarter, and remember, there was probably a peak of cynicism when they made fun of valeria's house gond. which burned down, they laughed about it, and now olena talks about some political moments, and very often, by the way, and... the 95th quarter and there is a diesel show, for example, this show is humorous, exposed, the authors of which are now exposed to more and more criticism, they absolutely do not accept it, they believe that it is either some senseless attacks, or it is hate speech, or it is some kind of political order, that is, you see, even from this passage we can see that olena kravets, absolutely i am convinced that, well, why did they start us? to criticize the last 2-2 years, well , there was no such thing before, that is, but the question is that it usually happened, and from the 14th year, from the 2014th,

there was a lot of criticism of the 95th quarter, you can remember all these cases, loud enough, scandalous, and about ebonite sticks, how they joked about people, about students who were beaten on the maidan, they, there were a lot of disgusting jokes, really not self-deprecating, but disgusting. and they don't seem to remember anything about it, they think that it's okay, there was no criticism, and we can also listen now to olena kryvets perceives criticism towards herself and towards the show in which she worked, and she, by the way, compared herself to the gladiators, so that the gladiators go to the arena and they do something, they er... pass through under the blood, and the people sitting in the stands, they can

only show the top of their finger or the bottom of their finger there, and they do nothing, but here we are, gladiators, says olena kravets, and we do something, and that's why we are criticized, well, let's listen to this, this is an important thing when you realize that you are an author, you are the author of yourself life, well, you are writing your book of life, it seems to me that it is very important. things, when you don't have your own meaning, you start looking for it in another life, when you don't have the courage to step out into the arena, you start criticizing those who do, when you don't have the strength to get up from the couch and stop being a couch critic, you you begin to look for where to direct this criticism, and it seems to get easier for you, but in fact it is not. well, as i have already concluded for myself that olena kryvyts is absolutely not

breakthrough in this sense, she is obvious will not understand what is wrong, with those jokes, and accordingly also her colleagues, why this applies to us and to you too, because the quarter continues its work, they are now performing together with the women's quarter, such a big team, it is called the only quarter, and when you see, they continue to... to be criticized because they continue to not understand anything about the changes in society and they resort again and again to these pro-russian jokes, to offensive jokes, we can recall the case of, we discussed it on the air, you discussed it you know, for example, about the girl from siskadovsk , who apparently can't speak ukrainian, she's such a caricature fool, and here they are... they showed people from occupied skadovsk, obviously, when they wrote this

joke, they forgot to see that skadovsk occupied, and it was absolutely disgusting, then the people of kherson region were outraged, and the mayor of kherson , skadovsk, seems to have been outraged, and even after that, the participants of the quarter did not understand anything, they also began to interpret it all as... some attacks are political , like some order, and that is, i again draw the conclusion that this is some kind of lack of empathy, because people simply cannot understand that with their jokes they are inappropriately insulting people who are now, well , for a reason, ab occupation, well, and also completely recently, we saw a case of how a neighborhood mocked an employee of the rivne trade center, and here you know. this is the story, they constantly pedal the question that they respect the military, that they collect for the military,

they are grateful to the defense forces and so on, but the tcc is, well, in their opinion, obviously not the military, and they also made fun of one of the workers and thereby faced criticism again and again did not understand the obviousness of all this, that they are doing it wrong, and therefore we, well , i, again, sum it up by the fact that we and... next, we will see in the telethon, in particular and at various venues of the show of the 95th quarter, the participants of which cannot understand the circumstances in which they are now, how society has changed and they will continue, perhaps not understanding it, to promote some absolutely harmful messages , because they they just don't understand. and olena kryvets is constantly exposed to scandals, and here i still don't like this one moment, that we have a part of public people who quite consciously now admit that they used to do something wrong,

for example, they were infantile there, or they were not interested in politics , they performed for the russians at... russian venues, they believed, as, for example, nadia dorafeeva said that i thought being apolitical was cool, they were the ones who sincerely stated that it was normal, they received huge support society and continue to work, and those of our celebrities who begin to lie, manipulate, who begin to say that they are being attacked, that ukrainian society is somehow not like that, this is a very frequent and , from my point of view, very harmful thesis, which defeat is spoken by our show business stars, mostly those who blame ukrainian society, they say that it is sick, that it is somehow emotional, that we are all kind of aggressive, in fact it is not so, that is just how society reacts to lies, and it is absolutely normal, just need stop lying, that's the point, but olena kryvets, i'm taking her as an example,

i don't know, she's been criticized many times over the years, most recently in... at the company, as you remember , the brand that decided to the brand of underwear that released, began to release underwear for military personnel, more comfortable, they made a campaign when elena kryvets's face is there, and she says a quote to a military servicewoman, that's how it is now, and could not understand why not put a photo of a military serviceman . so and why, and here olena kryvets and this company were criticized, but neither the company nor olena kryvets paid attention to it, and now they reached the point where the criticism intensified even more, and they finally had to apologize for this company, especially when the girls, the servicemen said that all these quotes were inconsistent,

they were not asked for permission to use them, well, there was also a scandal with... elena kravets's show quiet evening, now we can watch various excerpts, this is a show on the dim dzheshwarnoi channel, which you allocated 33 million, and the show was not like that, of course three shows it must be recognized as the 95th quarter, there the authors tried to do something good, something good, talk about culture, even, but olena kryvets finally discovered ukrainian culture for herself, but the problem is that the show was not popular. show, olena kravets was not suitable for this format as a presenter, because this format is such a late night show or under a late night show, i don’t know, a sense of humor is necessary there, in olena kravets, especially such a quick and improvised sense of humor is not was, and that's why she was criticized, saying that she was a friend the president got such a job without

having any abilities for it, but i want to say in the end. about one more time, one more time to explain to you that the people who work in the quarter, for the most part, will not change, because they do not understand why they should change. more recently, and one of the actresses, iryna soponaru, who performs in the women's quarter, she came to youtube to alina dorotyuk, to the popular youtube channel, and the host alina also asked her: "well, what do you think about criticism all these jokes of yours, especially." a joke about siskadovsk. let's let's hear what iryna answered. for some reason, these previous years, no one touched the quarter. i understand where the legs grow from. perhaps someone from the audience does not understand, then i will tell you, this is a political order, because the presidential elections are right around the corner, and someone is so eager for power that he is ready to discredit this quarter from all sides. well, i don't, i don't

understand how you can not see the connection between this, between these. you know, events, that's why i don't accept my account, and i advised, of course, it's hard not to accept, because ira was showered a lot of bumps, and here and there there are some activists here and there and that, listen, it was a very funny number then, it went very well, everyone kind of laughed, for two days everyone laughed, and then two days later they remembered that oh appeared an excuse to attack the quarter, you know, to make a run of things and discredit the quarter, so i don't believe that... that this is sincere, it hurt someone so that they, that this is an ideological action, well, i think you understand everything, i i think i think that you, our viewers, understood that the 95th quarter was hopeless for a long time, we did a lot airs about it, well let's do another one because it

's all going on and you know, i really hope that shows like the 95th quarter, like the diesel show, they just cease to exist, or become very marginal, so that it's just, as they say, out of time, that is, such jokes are impossible, was it? the hope that they will change, but it simply breaks down into such and such interviews, when we understand that they will simply tell us that for any criticism, you are a political order and that's all, okay, they didn't mention me as poroshenko, they they still like to remember him for every opportunity, but now we are moving to state cinema, the topic is no less scandalous, because you know, if you know, if you watch our broadcasts, then state cinema, starting from the 19th year, when... maryna kuderchuk came to manage it , is exposed to constant criticism not only from the film community, but from a wider audience, and when the attacks of the state cinema on the dovzhenka

center began, well, i did not expect that this scandal would turn out to be such an extra-cinema bubble, and people who would never , in principle, even ukrainian cinema, especially ani dovzhenko was not interested in the center, but now we have a situation with... with the film support council, as i said at the beginning of our program, it is a council, it is a body that determines which films will win, which films will receive state funding, and accordingly , what films can we watch, we will be able to watch in two or three years, and andriy kotlyar is on direct contact with our producer, andriyu, can you hear me? congratulations, yes, i hear it well, well, this is our song, good and new, we constantly talk about it on our broadcast, and about, in particular, there is a letter, yes,

another letter from the ukrainian film community with demands and with demands, in particular, to monitor how transparently the elections of new members of the council for state support of cinema will take place, please explain why, why are there suspicions that this may all be happening in a non-transparent manner? well, in general, the management of the state cinema and, in general, people who are involved in the management of this central body of executive power, have been discrediting the very idea of ​​state presence in the field of cinematography for many years, that is, starting long before full scale invasion since covid, ms. koderchuk... er shared her knowledge in the field of medical management and said that we need to build more hospitals, instead of doing her job and standing up for the interests

of the industry, as her colleagues in throughout the world, in europe in particular, after the full-scale invasion, the situation has not even worsened, it has become more visible, because the body that should ee... be at the forefront of the process of this cultural diplomacy, including promotion of ukrainian cinema abroad, once again showed its inactivity, apathy, unprofessionalism, and actually film therapists found themselves alone with all the challenges associated with this, in many ways the ukrainian institute, which specializes in the promotion of ukrainian culture abroad, shouldered the burden here. but in general, again, in the first special full-scale year, we relied more on ourselves, on specialized public organizations, which, unlike drzhkino

, joined the process of providing assistance, consolidating the industry, those messages that we goto, well, with which we go out into the world and generally helped each other in strengthening the representation of ukrainian cinema, and all this time there was a body, a council from the state. state support of cinematography, what a great pity, instead of representing the interests of the entire community, establish clear, transparent rules of the game. worked for many years in the interests of absolutely specific e- businesses, productions, interests and political agents, in the 23rd year , these gentlemen and ladies were supposed to have their powers terminated by law, well, they simply slipped away contract, in some incredible way state cinema thought that their tenure in

office was obvious. key to the defense capability of our country, and through the cabinet of ministers, a decision was made to extend the term of the activity of this drzhkino council until the end of martial law, and it seems like another 6 months or something. the film community reacted to this, we went through a difficult process together with the union of cinematographers of ukraine, caring colleagues, the public at three levels of the courts of first instance of appeal, the supreme court of cassation... about the extension the activities of the derzhkino council are illegitimate, in fact, this legal path was taken about a year ago, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the terzhkino council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members, andriy artem kolyubayev,

who is... a business partner of andriy yermak , that is , such people, well yes, absolutely, well, if , in general, these people should have simply left in the 23rd year, and instead of them should have been at the transparent competition, they cannot do it twice, if there is such a big, big nuance, they cannot by law hold office twice and obviously it has become a problem for them or for people whose interests they represent... now the community has consolidated, i think it is the first time in recent years that very different productions, which were still there, i don't know, a few years ago, competed with each other , united in reaching a kind of fair social contract, which will make it possible to restore trust in the institution, and secondly, to promote the development of ukrainian cinema on an honest and transparent basis, at the request of the supreme

court, derzhkino is now starting hold a contest for the election of new board members and the first of its stages is the election of a commission that will actually vote for the members of the state cinema board, and we see serious risks in the fact that state cinema may not conduct this stage transparently in order to eventually form. a commission of convenient managed people who will elect, again, conveniently managed people, who will uh vote as they say, uh, and instead of the interests of the entire film community, they will present something, represent something of their own. in short, these are all really, very difficult matters to explain, er, we we want everything to be as honest as possible. and

we transparently call for this in an open letter , we will call on the president, authorized representatives of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, and in general we emphasize once again that the money from the 2024 state budget should be sent to the armed forces of ukraine, because it seems impossible to distribute it honestly and transparently within the framework of the budget year the state cinema as an institution needs a deep reset, the head of the state cinema, its members and, in general, a dialogue about how ukrainian cinema ended up, well, at the bottom, in fact, because in the following years, due to inactivity and the fact that this state body is taxed, we will not see major ukrainian releases, but if we do, it will be one, two or three films a year. andrii, we have literally four minutes left, but i still have two important questions about the first requirement. to choose

the resignation of maryna kudarchuk, the appointment of a new head of the state cinema, there is an opinion that this is of no importance, the figure of the head of the state cinema does not matter, because she is still said to be controlled, and it is possible to re-elect the same a controlled person, they say, no, well, what is the difference, well, i tell all skeptics that if you think like that, then you can climb into the death pit already, and it was not worth going, no matter how much. people told us that it was impossible to disrupt the distribution of these funds, there were dozens of people, people's deputies, lobbyists, representatives who are closer, further to the authorities, everything worked out, it worked out, thank god, it still exists in ukraine, er, one way or another, an independent judicial system, which is about justice, er, so er, without pessimism, we...