shelling and so on and so on, this story was crowned by the fact that the real provision of civil shipping was achieved exclusively by the work of the armed forces of ukraine. i don't know if we can say that this three-way story, the three-way format gave us some time to have the tools and to have it possible. to cut a road for ourselves and our ships and foreign ships with our grain by sea, but now civil shipping in the black sea exists in a limited format, but we can carry it out and we can support it, and here in principle, this is a three-way story, it had an exclusively temporary temporary effect, maybe volodymyr zelensky had something like that? something like that, because we understand that

any arrangement with the russian federation is highly uncertain, highly uncertain history, and shouldn't be relied on too much for sure, but that it might help us buy time for something, right? perhaps this is exactly what the ukrainian president had in mind, but it is strange to sit and think about it. in fact, everything can be, but the question is whether does russia need it? will russia at this stage go to, well, for example, to a cease-fire, whether it is beneficial for them or not, that is also a question, and here the question is, what will win, we are talking about what we, we have to win , somehow time, again, maybe, but only if the west sets itself the goal that ukraine must...

win this war, and ukraine must never be attacked by russia ever again. this is the main question. if the west does not ask itself such a question, it is likely that well, let it not be 100%, but 90%, ukraine, which will not be under the security umbrella of the western world. will be attacked by russia? you asked the question, does russia need it, pause, does russia need it? well, again, returning exclusively to the statistical data of the last literally two months, we are mainly talking about june, which has passed, then all the graphs and all the exclusively confirmed data of our general staff indicate that the losses of automotive equipment, special equipment, artillery systems.

in general, there is a peak in june 2024 from the side the russian federation is colossal, as far as air defense is concerned, in principle , there are also a lot of destroyed and damaged assets, there were more only in june 2023, that is , exactly one year ago, and this is quite illustrative, ukraine finds opportunities to destroy russian capabilities. on the battlefield and in the front-line territories, but whether this is enough for putin to see the need for a break, we cannot be sure at all, because we have certain successes, we are grinding the russian army, this is objective, but we are grinding just the same and its capabilities, and russia is also draining the ukrainian population, draining... the ukrainian

economy, ukrainian energy resources, economically, we now have a situation, to put it mildly, not the best because, again , of energy carriers, we see what is currently being done in the country , the audience will not let you lie, business is not in the best situation today because of this, and we have both objective and, unfortunately, not very good reasons, and we must understand that russia is unlikely to stop in this direction. at least until the moment when we are closed heaven, if only by the same patriots. by the way, how many have we asked for over the years, that we need how many, 7, 8, 9, 10, at least of these systems that are available in the world, that could already be in ukraine. unfortunately, this is another delay and misunderstanding of what ukraine needs, it led to what we have today, ugh. this situation with

the power system, i would like to consider one more side, in general, let's create a parallel reality for ourselves, at least some negotiations. about the future settlement of the situation, i am now very careful about any formulations between russia and ukraine. the fact is that, if it were not for the war, the powers of the ukrainian president would have been exhausted, but the constitution of ukraine provides president volodymyr zelensky with his position because of martial law, because the war with the russian federation is ongoing. it seems to me that everything is quite clear here, but the russian federation has never paid attention either to our constitution, or to any more or less non-fictitious documents of a global scale, not to mention us, and they are also quite clear made it clear that for them president

zelenskyi and the ukrainian government are not at all something legitimate here, now in our country, for them both the previous governments and the previous president. was not legitimate, they called them a junta in general, but they equated them with neo-nazis, less so, do we consider vladimir putin the legitimate president of the russian federation? i don't, because i don't think that what happened and was called an election in russia was really an election, and the question is not even that everything was written as it should be for the current kremlin. the issue is that the annexed ukrainian territories took part in the vote, the fact that they are now temporarily effectively controlled by the russian federation does not in any way change the fact that although russia has written them into its

constitution, at the same time, it seems to me, absolutely delegalized its own basic law. well, let's, i don't know, write it into the ukrainian constitution. er, there are some maldives and we will say that they are ours, well, then what will our constitution turn into if we shove whatever we want in there, well that is, there is some logic, russia doesn’t care, russia doesn’t care, they don’t have a constitution, they don’t have laws, they don’t have anything, what should be contained in a state of law, russia should not be considered through the prism of the fact that they have a government , there is a constitution, there are... some deputies, there is a state council, it should not be considered from the point of view of the rule of law, it is a state entity, well, you can even say a terrorist state entity, which is waging war against a number of

states recognized under international law , so i would not consider it at all and would not lay it out at least in terms of...points, there is their own constitutional order, because it is absent, only tsar putin is present there, there is a certain vertical of power of the fsb, the gru, relatively speaking, all these international, actually recognized sanctioned persons, and here the question arises, really , then how to conduct any negotiations with such people at all, on the one hand, on the other hand, we understand... that it is unlikely to ever change, well, well, putin, not putin, there will be a new putin, two putins, putin 3, putin 10, it doesn't matter, that's why we are probably talking about certain ones mediators, but there is another situation, which is that many countries

still recognize putin, well, for example, even the united states of america does not say that putin is illegitimate, it is for us that he may be illegitimate. for many countries, the symbol of the civilized world is the legitimate leader of russia, period, yes, they say, we do not recognize elections in the occupied territories, we have not recognized elections since the 14th year in crimea, but we recognize that putin is the legitimate leader of russia , and here we will not get anywhere from this ship, if the majority of states they don't have the strength, they don't have the understanding that the state structure of russia in this form, as per... must be dismantled, then what else can be discussed, then of course we have to play this game in such a case, that's why that, unfortunately, we do not set the rules here, the rules are set by those hegemon states that create world politics, at the expense of the fact that russia does not recognize

our leadership, and i will explain why they do it, they do it of course, first of all, to to informationally delegitimize the ukrainian authorities, and... secondly, even if they in the future, they will sign something, then they will say, i'm sorry, we didn't recognize them, we don't recognize these treaties, any treaties. signed with russia, this is just toilet paper for them . to sign any truce, any guarantees, any agreements, no matter at what point and in what form it will be, we must have our guarantees from the civilized world. because of guarantees from russia in principle, they do not exist a priori, there can be no guarantees from putin, from medvedev,

from shoigu or from patrushev, there is no guarantee from terrorists, gopniks, that's all, this is an axiom, that's why, that's why, that's a big problem , that so that we do not lay down, we must now work on that, no matter what happens and i, no matter what the situation is regarding the same negotiations, we must understand we. must , together with the western world, lay the security foundation today so that there will be no war in the future, because if there is, because if people understand that there will be a war in the future, people will flee from ukraine, many people will say: oh, listen, there are no guarantees, we will leave, we will leave here. even now, many people are simply trying to flee there across the border, that is another question, moral, legality, what they... are doing, but they are leaving now, even taking into account the fact that the borders

are closed, if the borders are open and say , sorry, there are no guarantees now that the war will not resume in a year, 2, 3, 5, 10, then people will start fleeing ukraine, this is the number one task for all of us, for the president, for the government, for the verkhovna rada, and most importantly, it is a task for the entire western civilization if it wants ukraine to... exist, for ukraine to be an independent state, so that ukraine is a subject and part of the civilized world, they must offer us such an option that will indicate that ukraine will be, no one will attack ukraine, and ukraine will be part of nato, part of the european union, ukraine will get all the necessary funds for the recovery, for the return of our citizens to... the country and russia will continue to bear responsibility for its actions, without each of these points we will

have a problem, problem, problem, problem, which is called one general word: gray area, this cannot be allowed in any case. well, as promised, now we will try to look at what is happening in france, and the first round of elections there shows that the right gets 34%, the left - 29, macron's party 21. marine le pen's national association is in the lead. exit polls say that 34.2% of french people vote for him. in second place is the block of left parties, the new people's front, which includes socialists, communists, environmentalists, etc. 29.1% voted for him. the party of incumbent president macron, revival and its allies have been together for a long time. have the support of 21.5% of voters, another 10% of french people vote for

republicans, some of whom may enter into an alliance with the far-right, and the turnout in these elections is a record 68%, this is also a characteristic feature of this election process, more than 20 million, almost 21 million voters voted, in france there is a majoritarian system of parliamentary elections, the second round is ahead, which will take place on july 7. in principle, the situation can change, president macron, after the results of the elections to the european parliament, which were not very satisfactory for him, announced that there will be elections to the national assembly as well, but, but i would like to note that macron simply had a one-time and rather sharp reaction to the , which is happening in europe in general, is a trend. which are now in the european union, the elections in the european parliament led to the fact that

he announced elections in his country as well, and did he understand that he would find himself in a not very attractive situation for himself, i think so, but he still takes this step, why in your opinion? and macron wanted to act in advance, that is, after seeing the results before the european parliament, macron thought that it would lay down. before the presidential elections, which will be held in 2027, we saw that, by the way, the percentage in the elections to the european parliament and in the elections to the national parliament. in marie le pen's party, he is somewhere approximately the same, 32, 34, 35%. macron is convinced that after all, they will manage to turn around the situation of the second round, rightly or wrongly, but i think he believes, at least in this. look, in fact, he could have said: i need

to wait until the 27th year, i will calmly serve my term, then... even then, well , that is, in fact, he has a majority in the parliament, the current parliament, he has a presidential vertical, he controls everything, the elections to the parliament could be held in 2027 together with the elections to the elections presidential, and accordingly everything, macron completes his second round, then, well, there he wins, for example, marie le pen, or for example, someone else from the representatives of the national front wins, it could be so, it could be macron. eh, conditionally speaking, tried to prevent such a development of events for the presidential elections now. whether he was wrong or not, i think it is too early to judge. why? i would not call the french elections a complete victory for marine le pen's national front. ugh. they really get 34%, but the left bloc gets 28-29%.

that is, these are their votes practically. are polarized, in france we see an absolute polarization of the voters, and somewhere in the middle 20%, these are centrists, by the way, centrists - well, this is the phenomenon that macron created, because france has never had centrists, france has always were right and always were left, they were just a little less right, less left, but centrists, as a rule, never existed in france, macron created this phenomenon. but, as we can see, he has not completely taken root, so there is still this polarization, it is very important here what kind there will be a second round. the second round, we just have to understand the electoral system in france in general, it consists in the fact that all constituencies are majoritarian, these percentages are simply, well, conventionally

calculated for the general public in order to see trends, but they are not correspond to the number of mandates, because... that one candidate is elected in each district, that is, as of now , 34 candidates out of 577 have won in france from the national front, the rest - 30 28, if i am not mistaken, these are the people who won from the bloc left, and only two candidates won from macron's party, we will see further, because in fact the party... macron and the left are allegedly going to withdraw their candidates in those constituencies where one of them will win, and here it can have a cumulative effect, so i i will not say yet that the party of marie le pen won completely, yes there is a certain trend, yes this trend shows that the right

movements in europe every month and every year ... at least in the last five-year period are gaining big big results, gaining great strength, and why? europe already already had a similar experience, and we understand that historical processes, they very often have a spiral character, if you can say so, and why exactly such a trend appears again, well, first of all, we must understand here that the right movements, of course, this does not mean that they... are fascists there, or are they some kind, that is, let's not fall into such maximalism here and fall into such thoughts that it's supposed to be that some kind of nazis , hitlerites are going there, it's absolutely not true, it's normal that there are leftists, there are centrists, there are rightists, there are, there are different movements and there is, of course, the same

political force afd in germany, for example. well, there is a slightly different question, there is the party of marie le pen, which is now slowly gravitating towards the center. but why do they recruit? the reason lies in the absolutely wrong policy, which, unfortunately, some states in the european union pursued. and this policy is primarily based on the reception of migrants, i.e. these states probably received such a large number of migrants. which they couldn't master, look, actually, the reception of migrants, it's not a completely negative thing there, it's just that every the state must understand: there is a certain limit and there is a certain number of places that they can, a certain number of people that they can accept, because every migrant is also

a responsibility, every migrant must, if he arrived, socialize in this state, get housing , get a job, get a certain status, integrate into this society, and in the beginning really. it was like that, those waves of migrants, the first who arrived in great britain, in france, in germany, in sweden, in other countries, they, they integrated perfectly, they, someone from some of them have now become politicians, some have become businessmen, some have become doctors, their children have studied and they have become full-fledged members of society, well, i'm afraid that we are in this rhetoric in principle. went a little in the wrong direction, because there are certainly successful cases, this is very important, and we can talk about it, but the position of the left,

so let's try to illustrate a little now that the position of the left i say, i say, i conclude, i say from the point of view of the left, that the initial idea was completely unconscious, it consisted in the fact that people who, unfortunately, suffer from troubles, various troubles in their countries, they could adapt, they could come to those countries, i am not sure about adapting, i am not sure about becoming members of society, the leftists at least wanted it to happen, but the rest happened like that, that language it is about the fact that people who flee their countries and find themselves conditionally, now i say very conditionally, there in the middle of the ocean, they have only one way forward, and to specific shores. and if these shores repel them, it very often means simply death for them, and europe has found itself, or rather europe was found, and we can also

talk about it, this is a long-known fact, in a situation where it has to either actually show, demonstrate in practice these values ​​it professes, or reason exclusively from practical, well, some opinions, and how much we can take, how can we provide them? read, as much as we can integrate, practice and values ​​ended up a little here, well, let's say so, on different, on different, well, completely planes, in different planes, but europe was brought to this naturally, let's say, step by step, and did it, in particular russian president putin, and all these migrant waves and crises that took place, already after he started. armed aggression against ukraine in 2014, all this is just as well worth considering with the puzzle of the unified picture, the issue here is complex, it consists

in what we said about ukraine, that many states, many state leaders have turned a blind eye for years and decades on terrorism, turned a blind eye to international terrorists, turned a blind eye to those... people who committed crimes against humanity, who violated international law, and among them there is, including vladimir putin, this is a person who is also guilty of the fact that so many migrants are arriving in the european union, this is a person who entered, for example, the same syria , supporting, in fact , such... the same war criminal as him, bashar assad, who committed crimes against his own people, that is, the issue is so

difficult and so complex, and its root is not now, its root is in the distant zero, maybe in the 90s somewhere, but rather in the zero days, when european states, european leaders... thought that we would fence off, or even not fence off, that we would put up with, build business, build relations with such people as the kagebist, putin, but we would not have any consequences, they got the consequences, and so when i say that this left-wing politics... it also led to these results, because these are also the results of the left-wing politics, when they tried to flirt with such people, there has to be a middle ground, in my opinion, a middle ground in that and

to help... people, and to fight terrorists, and to fulfill international law, and now even in europe we need to find some kind of middle ground so that it is not too late, because unfortunately, we see that the authorities, including in people are coming to different states who are ready to break up the european union, who had relations with putin, who had... who are still flirting with the russian federation, well, let's finally say a few words with you about those who have already left the european union, and language is about great britain, our program is called the new week, and we not only analyze what is happening right now and has taken place in recent days, but also what is about to happen, and the results of this we will already discuss in our next program, but we are talking about the 4th of july and about

the british parliamentary elections. a week before the elections , three polls predict the defeat of sunak's party in great britain, actually, or, well , a key partner, our key partner, i think everything will be fine, because both the conservatives and the labor party equally support ukraine, well, everything will be fine, but that the party will be fine. everything will be fine with britain, there is a complete consensus, so i think there is nothing to worry about, at all, about anything and nothing, britain is and will support our country, i would also like to remind our viewers that today the whole evening is in the program in the new week, we ask you whether ukraine should agree to negotiations with the russian federation with the participation of the russian federation. the

way ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyi talked about it in his last interview, and i would now like us to again produced results as far as possible, the overwhelming majority, the vast majority of our respondents believe that it is not worth it, ukraine should not agree to such negotiations, 69% of the respondents and those who called us, and 31% think so. that it should be done like this, especially if there is someone standing between us, i hope from adequate sides, well, thank you, yes, thank you to our viewers, thank you, khrystyna, and we will meet with you in a week,

mom, i threw up, and me in... the heat is always easier to get poisoned with intoxication , dehydration can occur and it is important to restore water-electrolyte balance, when ordinary water is not enough, i recommend reo to adults and children, let's save ourselves with reo water, reo saves, reo is water for special medical purposes, in the latest issue of ukraine magazine, exclusive interview with diplomat oleksandr khara, why russia has the right to veto ukraine's accession to nato, a high-profile investigation, a road to nowhere, as the construction of a forest... highway can destroy a historical monument. the unique vitaly portnikov about the impact of the war on ukrainians and the values ​​that unite the nation. diary legendary nationalist mykola kokhanivskyi. the country is always at the forefront . look for the press at points of sale, or pre-pay online. tingling, numbness or crawling of ants in the limbs arise spontaneously and worry you. a special complex of active substances dolgit antineuro helps to normalize the functioning of the nervous system. neuro promotes

the return to usual activities, without tingling and numbness in the limbs. capsules dolіd antivro - help to your nervous system. euro-2024 only for mego. football europe ready to crown the new national team. who will become the champion and go down in history forever. watch all euro 2024 matches exclusively on meggo. oh, i remember, you see, although they say that our memory weakens with age, but i am attentive and remember everything. we accept. and feel the difference. the active substances of memoefect improve the functioning of the nervous system and contribute to the normalization of mental activity. memo effect by dr. ty improves memory and attention, helps to think. there are discounts that represent the only discounts on enterogermin, 15% in travel pharmacies, pam and ochadnik.