Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    July 12, 2024 5:30am-6:00am EEST

5:30 am
and in our country, we are forced to restore and rebuild the arms industry. i am a member of the national defense commission, that is, i am engaged in the military, i know a little about the nuances. we have to make huge efforts to get back here to what we had before. for this we have to think together, what then? now we have to think and now we have to discuss in order to have a concept so that we can start implementing it. you need to know what we... have to do, i am also in ukraine to talk about it. thank you very much, mr. marshalka, thank you very much for your openness and for this beautiful one analysis, and of course for the position. thank you very much. and i want to remind our tv viewers that bohdan borusewicz, a legendary polish politician, the head of the polish senate from 2005 to 2015, was currently working on the air of the tv channel, and now he works in the senate in the defense committee.
5:31 am
your place is waiting for you, the light is left on, for dinner - what you love, a warm bed. calved, there will be walks, swings and swimming, they are waiting for you on your street, at school, in your church, because in your house they see dreams about you, you are always in front eyes, they cry for you, they pray for you. we
5:32 am
were surprised, because we knew that you were already somewhere nearby. half the battle is knowing how hard it is to win, and we will do our best to embrace you as soon as possible. therefore, when you are at home, when we are... together, we are more than a family, we are a nation that has united around you, and now oleksandr morozov, a political scientist who is in prague, will be working on the air of the espresso tv channel, i am glad to see you, oleksandr , well, first of all , i would like to ask you about the assessment. of the so
5:33 am
-called astana summit, we understand that this is a story not only about putin, this is a story not even only about xi jinping, this is a story in general about the attempt to form a new, so- called alternative agenda to replace the so-called big summits and big events of the diplomatic international plan, which were held by the so-called collective event, so the agenda of astana and putin's readiness for something, what was all this for him? vladimir putin will definitely use this shos summit to build a very important line for him, which will lead to the success of the brics summit in kazan, which will take place in october. this brics summit in kazan is an extremely important diplomatic and political event for putin. why? because there is a struggle around the summit. expansion of the composition of brics countries was foreseen. the kremlin actively played against the applications of different countries. to demonstrate that he has
5:34 am
the support of the countries of the so-called global south, and here on the sidelines of the sco summit, i think the main goal of kremlin diplomacy is simply to prepare for the summit in kazan. alexander, but we understand that there is a public agenda, and there is a real agenda, so do we we understand that no matter who... in what way he makes a speech at the summit, the key story is the main problems, and the main problem is that putin is gradually being pressured, he is waiting for the story with the american elections, and from the other side there is also an agenda that is being shaped by china, and the chinese so-called plan, which is not publicly accepted, at least in the west, putin is also trying to involve, so if we are talking about the chinese plan, well...
5:35 am
in particular, it concerns the russo-ukrainian war. how do you think putin will be now? try to play it in their own interests. it seems to me that the situation has been decided. after vladimir putin, entering a new term, issued an ultimatum, i.e. formulated his vision of the end of the war in four points. this ultimatum leaves no room for diplomacy, neither for china, nor for hungary, nor for turkey. because, if it was possible to say about putin's package of proposals that the kremlin formulates the goals of the war in different ways, constantly talks about them, creates them in different ways... if the kremlin did that, then what can mr. xi or any other political politician can do, then what mr. golovasi or any other politician can do here, because
5:36 am
first of all, this demand of putin includes full recognition, and with the help of international treaties, of the annexation of the occupied territories. can act here china constantly publicly recognizes the territorial integrity of the entire country. this is maintained in chinese foreign policy quite strictly. in this ultimatum, putin demands that ukraine acquire neutral status, without nuclear status and renounce military-technical cooperation, rely on only on their own military and technical capabilities, etc. that is, putin proposes finlandization, if we use the old word period. before the cold war, it is impossible to fulfill this requirement in any way, because the war itself, which putin started, led to the fact that not only ukraine, but also many other countries and regions, finland, sweden, join nato, and that is why voices have been heard now , in particular viktor
5:37 am
orban, and the president of turkey erdogan said, maybe we don't know this, for sure, but apart from the ceasefire, this is the only thing that remains in the hands of different... actually, something like that may have happened on the grounds of the sco summit, at bilateral negotiations of some kind. oleksandr, what do you think, and for what purpose did putin so quickly and so brazenly announce his ultimatum, that is , the swiss peace summit was held, quite a few things were discussed, well, it was not directly on the agenda. russian aggression against ukraine, although we understand that everyone was talking about it, and now putin rolled out an ultimatum, no one, so to speak, dragged him to a certain place, but no, anyway, the first thing he did was announce something that cannot be , as you rightly point out, accepted in no public policy cabinet. yes,
5:38 am
this is a really important question and quite interesting, because indeed, during more than two years of active war, both putin and his... entourage produced many different descriptions, results of the war, etc. and now putin, entering a new mood, spoke like this. different assessments are possible here, but my answer is this: putin has done it now, targeting three audiences at once, believing that it is profitable for him. one audience is internal. putin has formed a new entourage around him, the old ones shuffled all the people and created an endless cabinet. and this sets a task before them, as if to say, you signed up for exactly this, this is what you should do for the next six years, this should be the result of your
5:39 am
work, this is the first moment, an appeal to your own political top of the bureaucracy. the second important point, putin undoubtedly addresses the ukrainian. society with this ultimatum. in the kremlin, everyone knows about it, not even the mood, there is a constant conviction that ukraine must weaken itself from the point of view of its moral, military and political spirit, to break before the irresistible power of the kremlin, simply put. putin, after president zelensky's term of office ended, first began to emphasize that zelensky is illegitimate and it is impossible to negotiate with him, etc. and this statement by putin is aimed at pushing, as the kremlin believes, a part of ukrainian society to the fact that this will be the case, accept it as inevitable, start changing your position and create a new one. and the third audience,
5:40 am
here, of course, is the countries of the alliance of global support of ukraine. first of all, the united states states. after all, putin here wants to say that, regardless of how things will develop. the scenario of the american elections in november, who will be the president, the position of the kremlin is this: it is absolutely unimportant to us, putin wants to say, who will be your president there, this is ... our demands on how this war should end, and we will deal with them either - which us president, or any nato secretary general, and now he is new, or any member of the european commission, will the european commission create a ministry of defense headed by the former prime minister of estonia, foreign policy department, the kremlin says: "this is the perspective, and no other." this leads to the fact that everyone has heard it. no doubt, everyone who makes political decisions, who develops further elements of
5:41 am
security policy, everyone heard perfectly well what putin said. yes, but if we are talking about the ukrainian audience, we understand that putin could not have voiced anything more stupid. yes, because it was not such a proposal that should have provoked an intra-ukrainian discussion. this is, so to speak, the ultimate requirement, give back what russia... hasn't captured yet, and we understand that these stories don't work, on the other hand, you very correctly pointed out, putin is trying to mark, that is, to put up certain markers of his appetites, and that is without a doubt intended for a western audience, and accordingly the key story, putin is in a big hurry, we understand that he would like to be in time for the elections in the united states, maybe some big events are still planned, because putin is really... well, he is raping his generals extremely hard , yes, when talking about
5:42 am
offensive at any cost, those two months of the summer campaign, well, they are extremely bloody and tense. here is a rather strange situation, as far as it can be seen, the fact is that, on the one hand, in the summer of this year, many people predicted, and not without reason, that the kremlin would conduct a rather large offensive, not just tactical, but quite convincing, which would register itself as an asset. such an offensive, which would change the situation in favor of the kremlin quite strongly, on the one hand, and on the other hand, we are surprised to see that at the same time putin changed the minister of defense and put in the place of the minister of defense some kind of accountant, a person who is responsible for ensuring that the army spends half the time fighting, and the other half correctly drawing up financial documents, and the second moment here is extremely historic: arrests and accusations of chess are taking place at the same time. not only is general petrov accused
5:43 am
of fraud, but yesterday we saw reports that the commander of the guards airborne assault brigade, colonel horodylov, seems to have that name, also accused of fraud. i would say it is a rather strange situation for preparing or carrying out an offensive, because such events, in my opinion, greatly demoralize the military leadership on the ground. that is, if you imagine that they are talking about this in the trenches, and we have an idea about it through, of course, war correspondents, war correspondents, then it is clear that everyone there is confused. how so? the most active and authoritative russian military commanders in the trenches, for some reason, follow an article about fraud, are these some strange events? this is one side of it all. the other side is still, despite that in the first half of 2024 were recorded rather insignificant. it is clearly visible that parity has been achieved and this parity is not
5:44 am
breaking, that is, yes, the russian army continues to inflict heavy blows on the infrastructure, but ukraine has been extremely successfully active for all six months of this year , from the moment it just started receiving military aid, but also before this drone the war that... ukraine was quite effective. and i must say that i do not see any ideas in the russian military and political environment, how this parity can be ruined. so it's a difficult situation. and it seems to me that this is precisely why the kremlin is now somewhat supporting and twisting the gnotic, organizing arguments around the concept of a possible truce or peace, peace documents, peace negotiations. that is why the kremlin highlighted something again... here, of course, as i said at the very beginning, a big role
5:45 am
is played by the brics summit in kazan, no wonder, because before putin's october summit, after all, he has to pretend to be a peacemaker, he has to constantly hint to a global audience that he is for peace at all, to constantly continue the game that this is not kyiv wants peace, constantly appeals to some old documents, in particular those of istanbul, but the so-called istanbul documents, even if they are not ratified or even signed , preferably, but the istanbul documents go against what putin announced and what we call putin's ultimatum, and speaking again... let's go back to this ultimatum, is this about psychopathology, do you think the kremlin has a scenario plan, that is, they follow some clear, i don't know directive line, or they just depend on the mood his own fuhrer at least now it is clear that putin , on the one hand, has resorted to steps that clearly
5:46 am
demonstrate that he is going to fight for a long time. this is primarily evident from the reshuffles he made in the russian... political and military leadership after the start of the new term. he showed with these permutations that the entire calculation of the war must be calculated in a different way, because it will be long. hence all these economic changes in the economic bloc. it's one sided, and he shows it clearly. the other side is that the individual does not have an answer to the question of how to act further, if it persists and will intensify. and develop a global alliance of support for ukraine. this is a fundamental factor. putin and the kremlin always say that the war would have ended if the west had not supported ukraine. this is said with an insult, sometimes in an insulting tone, or in the tone of diplomatic maneuvers. however, this is the main point. and of course, putin's dream is that the global alliance
5:47 am
supporting ukraine weakens, gives up, changes its position. it must be said, there is no such thing, it is clearly visible. on the contrary, if you look at what is happening now at the nato summit, the kremlin media will decide and pour curses, because at the nato summit in washington, which will happen in less than 10 days, it will be clearly demonstrated that long institutions have been created and will continue to be created in relation to the kremlin and its war against ukraine support, i.e. all support is institutionalized and regardless of who... will be the president of the usa, which parties will win in the european parliament, there are long documents voted in the us congress that will not change. regarding this, we can clearly see that the kremlin from with great energy churns his contacts with the third world like a milk frog to form sour cream. everyone sees it well and clearly, to cling to at least something, at least for a small
5:48 am
island state that seems to support the kremlin, for some international institutions. political regimes that openly and openly supported the kremlin on planet earth, i would say, except for north korea, we all have great doubts about iran and china, there is a great struggle. and by the way, returning to china, yes, or perhaps, during this astana conversation, xijin ping was very will specifically voice his sacramental message to putin. the question is putin, how long are you going to fight with ukraine, yes, because the chinese also have their own plans for what is called continental cooperation, that is , the chinese are not just measuring in hundreds of billions, the chinese are now very dependent on keeping their entire bloated economy and all his machinations. there is an important point here: china will never
5:49 am
enter into an alliance of direct struggle with the kremlin, but at the same time china is demonstrating to the kremlin. the war is more aggressive, aimed at the territorial admiration for china is unacceptable. i have no doubt that china and turkey, as well as many other countries and in latin america , are also ready to render some favor to putin in ending the war, in ending the war, and not in continuing it under the terms of the ultimatum that putin put forward. however , there are no prospects for this now, because, i think, many people have asked putin, and he... erdogan, on the sidelines of this summit, also asked putin again, saying, maybe you want to take some new steps, so we are ready help but putin's answer is obvious. no, everything is formulated in the ultimatum, if we carry out what is in the ultimatum, once again i return to where we started, no one has any prospects for conducting any
5:50 am
diplomacy regarding the end of the war, and the fact that on planet earth there are dozens politicians wanted... to win the nobel peace prize for creating a structure to end this war, there is no doubt about it, everyone dreams of it. thank you very much, oleksandr, for this extremely interesting and informative conversation, i want to remind our viewers that now oleksandr morozov, a well-known political scientist, worked for them from prague. well, the time of our program is over, stay tuned to espressu tv channel. my colleagues will inform you about all the most important events of this day. take care of yourself and your loved ones. see you on air. pick up the wounded in time. from the battlefield, it means saving his life, gave a lift to bc, gave a lift to the boys, a quad bike is a way from zero to our life. at this stage of the war,
5:51 am
the atv is the best solution for evacuating the wounded from scratch. we encourage everyone to donate to the collection from scratch to life on quad bikes for the 93rd kholodny yar brigade in the direction of chasiv yar. see this week in the program judicial control with tatyana. candidates for the vrp according to the president's quota, who angered the ethics council? i have nothing to do with this record. please excuse me. but who spent millions on cars at the height of the war? so i came to the car dealership and bought them. greetings, you are watching judicial control, and i am tatyana shustrova. despite the full-scale war, ukraine continues its path to the european union and does not stop in its implementation. forms, in particular judicial ones reforms the competition for the selection of members of the supreme council of justice is ongoing. the ethics council elects candidates according to the president's quota. we
5:52 am
will introduce you to the brightest candidates. but first to the news. there are 28 applicants for the single vacant position of a member of the higher qualification commission of judges. among the candidates are the judges of the supreme court, the higher anti-corruption court, the judge of the appeal court, the judge of the place. judges and retired judges. a vacant position in the supreme court of justice appeared after a member of the supreme court of justice voluntarily resigned on march 27, according to the judge's quota. judge roman ignatov of the kyiv court of appeals. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the supreme court of ukraine is carried out by a competitive commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17,
5:53 am
has a quorum, and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of the state government and of judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors, consists of ten persons elected by the congress of judges of ukraine. two are appointed by the president, two are elected by the verkhovna rada, two more by the congress of lawyers, two are delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors, and two more are elected by the congress of scientists and representatives of legal higher education institutions. currently, there is no one in the vrp under the quota of the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi representative the selection is ongoing. 18 candidates submitted documents for participation in the competition. eight of them had interviews with the ethics council. others either arbitrarily withdrew from the competition, or... did not pass the preliminary stage, not all candidates have a crystal reputation. today we will tell you who is trying to get to one of the most influential and key bodies of judicial
5:54 am
power. this is olena zaichko, a judge of the kharkiv district administrative court. this is not the first time she has tried to become a member of the supreme council of justice. among her career achievements - making questionable decisions, making decisions during training that directly contradict the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of assets. in 2020 , olena zaichko made a decision to develop 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this plot, according to another court decision, construction cooperative slice, which is part of the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy ihor arich, received permission to build. it is interesting that immediately after this decision, the children of judge zaichko, who were minors at the time, got ownership of an apartment from kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m2. also the judge likes expensive cars. in 2021 , she... took care of lexus for almost uah 2 million. our colleagues from investigation-info received recordings of telephone conversations, presumably of judge olena zaichko. the investigative information found out and released
5:55 am
a whole material about how she goes to vorozhka there, does other strange things, but the most interesting thing is that she destroyed the disc with the audio recording of the court session. in a conversation dated august 13, 2020, a woman with a voice similar to zaichko discusses with a colleague the possibility of spoiling a disc with material. cases, as well as ways to change the cherished judge's decision on the contrary, there is nothing to do with this record, i don’t know how to comment on it, please excuse me, zaichko obviously implemented the plan to change the decision, she signed the decision to dismiss the lawsuit in the courtroom, she voiced the opposite in the courtroom, the members of the ethics council inquired this story, everything recorded in the conversation matches and the person... with whom the conversation is held also matches, you sit in our room, you prepare a document, sign it and
5:56 am
say that... uh, and then you , when you declare, you say that the claim is unsatisfied, how these events took place four years ago, uh, what motivated what was on us, well, what motivated why exactly this happened, of course, i don't remember, and so throughout the interview olena zaichko denied that it had anything to do with the audio recording , made public by journalists, assured that she does not know the people mentioned in it and does not remember any circumstances, complete amnesia, with this baggage olena zaichko is already... for the second time applying for the competition to the supreme council of justice. it is interesting that at the same time she is a member of the all-ukrainian association of administrative judges, which called the president to promise a law on the reform of the grp, due to the fact that it allegedly threatens the sovereignty of ukraine, as it contains instruments of influence of foreign states. thus, zaichko is desperately trying to become a part of the reform, which he considers to be a violation of judicial independence. not very logical. last year, despite numerous facts
5:57 am
of ethical dishonesty. yes, olena zaichko was approved as a candidate for the position of a member of the ukrainian people's party of ukraine, but the verkhovna rada did not elect her. in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko. if a positive decision on it threatens the judge with dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in the dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but it is registered in... a dormitory, it is all the fault of the developer, who did not enter the property in the register, so i lived in it, since the apartment was physically ready, but legally, legally, i until october 23 i couldn't do it since i didn't have a confirmation, it wasn't until october 23rd was entered in the register of real estate, and in general, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that
5:58 am
there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaring a place of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights, the place of declaration is intended either for postal correspondence, or, for example, for the exercise of certain rights, in particular political ones, more declaration has no effect on anything. vrp candidate vladyslav ivashchenko likes cars, he has a toyota rav 4 talent cruiser 150, he bought the first one allegedly by selling three old ones, and by purchasing a new rav-4 from the salon in the midst of a full-scale war, he literally saved millions of deposits. i came to the car dealership and bought them. i had a current deposit
5:59 am
of more than uah 4 million in my bank account. in connection with the fact that the bombings began in the city of kyiv, i could not withdraw this money from the bank account, and my wife and i decided to use part of this money to buy a new car three years ago, vladyslav ivashchenko's wife was very lucky, she managed to purchase almost 2 hectares of land near kyiv for only $3,500. why does the value of a plot of land differ significantly? and this is almost 10 times. since this plot of land is located outside the settlement, it is actually intended for agriculture. all the more, it had flaws on this plot of land, it was swampy, even for this activity
6:00 am
it... was not quite suitable. vladyslav ivashchenko insists on his political neutrality. please tell me do you consider yourself a politically neutral person? absolutely. were you a co-founder of any public organizations with people's deputies, were you or were you not? no, never. but in the end, he remembered how he was a co-founder of the institute of political crisis, a public organization, together with a former people's deputy. he generally... he doesn’t consider it important, a former political figure approached me, he asked, let’s say, for his status, i put my signature so that a person just, let’s say, had some kind of public organization, er, without registering for...

14 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on