ukraine and collaborative activities. zakharova's property was seized, and she herself faces up to 12 years in prison. the kherson regional prosecutor's office has already sent an indictment to the court. the case is being considered by the malinovsky district court of the city of odesa. but one criminal case was not enough for zakharova. she diligently worked for another one. when this zaprodanka was appointed as the head of the elections in the kherson region, she understood. if you intimidate people and... force them to vote, if you throw in ballots and falsify the results, the bunker grandfather will be very pleased, and what could be more important for her in this life? we are already fully ready for elections in september 2023 . in september, the security service of ukraine informed her about the second suspicion. the law enforcement officers established that this traitor, on the instructions of curators from the kremlin, created the appearance of the election process in the kherson region and falsified it. held a so-called plebiscite

in favor of russian dolls. she also organized a process in which representatives of fake election commissions are accompanied armed militants carried out yard rounds of residents of temporarily occupied districts of the kherson region and forced them to participate in voting at gunpoint. all this in order to later report on the camera with a smile about the high turnout and sky-high ratings. flight was the leader according to the voting results. now, with two suspicions, zakharova is preparing for the next presidential election, which is to be held from march 15 to 17, 2024. perhaps, for their organization and conduct, this sales pike will receive a third suspicion, will go to prison for comfortable bed and finally calm down for many years, let's hope. runs with the russian mandate from the united russia party yevgenia romanivna rubin. born in 1995

, until february 24, she worked as a deputy director for administrative and technical issues at bc kherson bldg. yevgenia is known to the people of kherson as a fan of scriabin's work. during the election campaign in the fall of 2020 , with the participation of volodymyr salda, she revealed the morality of the musician's image and held a concert in his memory. i'm a fan. i am a fan of creativity kuzma we wanted to implement this idea for probably another four years. therefore, accordingly, they searched around the city where this mural could be placed. when kherson was occupied by the rashists, evgenia exchanged scriabin's work for russian songs. she took the chair of the head of the department of land relations in the occupation ministry of agriculture and fisheries of the kherson region, after which she was promoted, becoming the director of the institute of livestock breeding askania nova. apparently, the occupiers really liked the work of this traitor, because later they included her in the list of candidates.

deputies from the united russia party. after the semblance of the election, evgenia not only received a mandate, but became the head of the faction. as the head of the united russia faction in the kherson regional duma. as befits an important official, she created a telegram channel for herself, which now has 31 subscribers. in it, rubin glorifies the russian swamps, putin, tries to tell people that russia helps, liberates and saves, but for some reason no one understands her. and does not hear, well, except for the traitors themselves, just like her. i really hope that this angelochka is our law enforcement agencies wings will be clipped soon. i congratulate you on one of the most significant holidays of our state, the constitution day of the russian federation. this is another traitor with a mandate, andriy mykolayovych kharitonov, born in 1969 from the city of kherson. he is the former head of the watercraft section of the kherson shipbuilding plant. in 2015, he ran for the kherson

city council from the our land party and was unable to realize his political ambitions, and now the occupiers helped, who lured him with candy in the form of a mandate, he ran to the council, but everything was in order. when kherson was captured, andriy kharitonov betrayed ukraine and was one of the first to rush to help the russians. they thanked him with the chair of the director of the kherson sea and trade port. according to the information of our law enforcement agencies, it was kharitonov who ensured the transfer of military equipment and ammunition of the russian federation from the left bank to the right bank of the dnieper. kharitonov proved that he is an obedient dog, so he was made a deputy of the fake kherson regional duma. with the support of the united russia party and our senator ihor yuriyovych kostyukevich, we do not forget him either, we thank him. kharitonov already received a suspicion from the sbu. his case is currently being considered by the kherson city district court. court

of kherson region. a traitor faces up to 15 years in prison or life imprisonment with confiscation of property. we very much hope that he will receive a severe punishment for his actions against ukraine. it was the program collaborators and i, olena kononenko. if you have information about the kremlin sellers, write to us at this email address or simply on facebook. together we will send all the traitors in pursuit of the russian ship. see you in a week ether espresso. cities of budveri. has ukraine moved closer to membership? in nato we are talking about the results of the summit in washington. biden confused zelensky with putin, in the us they are again talking about replacing the candidate for the presidential election, and russia wanted to kill the head of rain metal. cnn writes about this, whether moscow is returning to the methods of the cold war.

serhii stetsenko will tell svoboda life about this and other things. the nato summit in washington has ended. we will talk about his results later during the program, and now about what... i remembered him for end. the current president of the united states, joe biden , slandered the ukrainian agreement twice during his final speeches at the ukraine compact event, he called volodymyr zelenskyi putin, and later at the final press conference he confused the name of vice president kamala harris and called her trump. given biden's lackluster performance in the first debate with trump, the embarrassment has reignited a heated debate over whether joe biden should run for a second term. white house how it was and what reactions caused biden's reasons, further in material america has already entered the pre-election race. the eyes of all americans are closely watching the us presidential candidates, donald trump and joe biden. the media and the leaders

of the partner countries are just as attentive to their every word. and against the background of talk about the disappointing health of the current us president, he says this during the presentation of zelenskyi. and now i want to pass it on. to the president of ukraine, who has as much courage, as much determination, ladies and gentlemen, president putin, president putin, you will defeat the president putin, president zelensky, i'm so focused on defeating putin that we should worry about it, i'm better, you're much better. unfortunately for joe biden, that wasn't his last rant of the day. later, journalists simply fell asleep at the press conference. his questions about domestic and foreign policy, among them a question about us vice president kamala harris: could kamala harris beat trump? - asked the journalist. i would not have elected vice president trump to be vice president if i did not believe that she

has sufficient qualifications to be the president, - answered biden, and now he did not even notice that he had slandered, of all the questions from journalists expected, many related to the topic of his health. is the president capable of taking responsibility for his actions, and joe biden assured reporters that he is ready to continue his work. i underwent three important intensive neurological examinations by a neurologist. in each case, they showed that i was in good shape. biden assured journalists that his european colleagues support him in his bid for re-election. french president emmanuel macron really supported joe biden after a series of reservations. he asked for leniency for the us president and assured that everything is fine with him. we all make mistakes sometimes, it happens to me, it may happen to me tomorrow, and i ask you for leniency, it is the leniency that is necessary between good people. i had

the opportunity to speak with president biden over dinner. i also had the opportunity to listen to his conversations on the sidelines, which i saw, as always, this is the president on business. clearly is responsible for matters in which he knows. german chancellor olaf scholz supported macron's opinion and noted that excuses happen, and people should pay attention to the substance, not the form. pretexts happen, and if you keep track of them all, you'll find plenty of them, but that doesn't change anything that the president of the united states made clear in his speech. he made it clear that we are all doing with our security partnerships, which we are in a sense bringing together in common. to guarantee ukraine's security and give it a chance to defend itself against russian aggression. britain's new prime minister, keir starmer , did not directly respond to questions about biden's verbal gaffes, instead praising his leadership. i was with him yesterday. we spent

most of an hour with him discussing many issues. we held two days of this summit, and came to very good results. he went through it all, spoke at every session. united people, and we got a good result. i think he should be given credit. by the way, in the kremlin itself at the behest of biden reckoned cold enough. putin's press secretary dmytro piskov pro. commented that , they say, they understand that all these were just verbal blunders, and in general, these are internal affairs of the usa, but piskov also noted that biden's rude statements about putin are unacceptable and do not beautify the american president, but the russian media used more epithets, when discussing biden's circumstances, they called the nato summit itself a farce and paid special attention to biden's mental health. the american president gave reasons again for a discussion about his mental health. at the closing of the nato summit, one is better than the other. but, if you don't pay

attention to a couple of caveats, biden was quite confident when talking to journalists, according to the correspondents who were there. the president was calm and smiled a lot, but even that didn't stop the media from slamming biden with the fact of repeated mistakes in primetime tv channels and on the front pages of online media. olga armyanyshina, radio liberty. and kiyan was also asked about biden's motives during the nato summit, and this is what they said think listen. well, our president got out of the situation nicely, he said that he is better than putin. ah, well, he is like an elderly person, yes, and before that he had an interview with journalists, he spoke normally. i think he is very tired. therefore, it is obvious that there may be certain consequences for ukraine. i think these are the mistakes. then the reaction of society in the united states, first of all , the reactions of partners there to the extent to which they

can trust biden, as a person who, at a respectable age, can be, well, president of the united states, because the security, well, not only of ukraine, in principle depends on the states, but also on the allies, conditionally, unimportantly, even unprincipledly, rather, what is the surname of the president in this case of the united states, the important position of the entire american people, the american political community and the american . states, but the excuses, they are characteristic of an older age, it may become some kind of meme after our victory, but everything will be fine, we will win, well, i think that it is probably too much for him, it is his senior year, and he probably already has dementia in him or alzheimer's, because it is very bad to confuse such things, i think that it cannot, because it does not depend only on biden. there are republicans, there are democrats, and there are smart people who are friends with our country and

help a lot. we're talking about biden's embarrassment and trump's peace plan right now , oleksandr mereshko, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the committee on foreign policy and interparliamentary cooperation, joins freedom live. alexander, i congratulate you. good evening. thanks for. let's start with the situation. these with the current president of the united states, this is the summit, was essentially supposed to be a triumphal summit for joe biden, a summit that was supposed to confirm his seriousness in his intentions to run for a second term, biden was supposed to essentially prove that he is in good physical shape, instead there was this confusion of last names, when he mixed up and the surname of zelenskyi and the vice-president, does this cause you any concern? well, to be honest, i don't have any concerns about this, because there are reasons. happen to every person, it's normal, i even liked how biden

came out of this issue with irony, you know, with such a sense of humor, when he mixed up the name of the president of ukraine and the kremlin dictator, but he came out with dignity, and that's the main thing. i believe that now biden is in normal working shape, but the question is what will happen in four years, we understand that the job of the president, that is, the head of such a ... powerful key country in the world, it is very difficult, and that is, what will happen in four years, we don't know, but you know, there is a saying that the king makes the world, that is, i see that in america very all mechanisms and institutions function effectively, that is, in order to prevent this from happening, the state will work and the president will work at a normal, effective level. ugh, mr. oleksandr, how do you like the result? summit in washington, could ukraine expect such a result, what was successful, what was not, what

do you say? well, the bar was very high for us, that is, we still hoped that we would receive an invitation, or at least, i hoped so deep down, at least that some kind of, you know, creative option with the start of inviting ukraine to membership, full membership in nato. unfortunately, this did not happen, but... let's hope for the next summit, but the main thing happened: first, it is not the inevitability of the process of joining ukraine to nato. as the secretary general of nato said that... it is a question of when ukraine will become a full member of nato, and not a question of when, not if, as he said, that is, it is very fundamentally important, that is, the issue has already been resolved, it for me, well, this is one of the biggest achievements, then 40 billion in aid for next year, this means that we are guaranteed

to receive the necessary military and technical assistance, further from... a special nato representative who will coordinate aid to ukraine, i.e. de facto we are already integrated and already integrated into nato structures, i.e. de facto we can to say that we are already in nato. well, i am very optimistic about another achievement of this summit. yes, the only thing i would like to clarify is that among all the agreements that were reached at this summit, ukraine did not receive any clear date regarding even the invitation to... e membership in the alliance, wanted to ask you the same way you can comment on the meeting of the hungarian prime minister viktor orbán with the likely candidate of the republicans for the presidency of the united states donald trump in florida. orban posted on the social network x that it was a 5-0 peace meeting, probably referring to the fact that after kyiv,

kyiv, moscow and beijing and the meeting with erdogan in washington, this was the fifth such peace meeting. well, it's interesting that... just a few days ago i predicted, i made such a prediction live on one of the tv channels about how this would end voyage or diplomatic quasi-peaceful tour of orbán, that he will definitely return to washington and meet with trump, and that is exactly what happened, that is, it is clear why this kind of performance is political on the part of orbán, that is, he wants to be liked. he has already, you know, bet on the fact that trump will become the president of the united states, although it is not known at all, here, but he is trying accordingly, this is such a pr, this is pr, quite frankly, cheap pr, and he has no authority for this, that is, he wants, you know, to show himself somehow, to do something like that hype, if you can say so, but

i just don’t see anything serious behind it, sir, and what do you think that... is meant when orbán says that he, that if trump is elected, we should expect good news in the plan to establish peace in ukraine, is it, as you just pointed out, pr, just words, or is it possible that trump has something, some trick up his sleeve? well, trump has talked about it several times, to be honest, i try to follow very carefully, carefully, what trump says, his approach, let's say, an expert on him. people from his circle try to read literature related to trump and so on, and try to analyze his policy, his foreign policy doctrine, when he was in the position of president, i understand one thing: for today, apart from these political statements, apart from trump's desire to achieve some

result and propose a peace plan, there is simply nothing concrete, because now ... trump is completely focused, he is doing everything to become the president, and he does not care about anything else, that is, all his statements should be viewed from this perspective: he wants to be liked to the voters, he wants to be elected to the post of president, and he will start thinking seriously about foreign policy, including the issue of ukraine later, now there is simply no point in even analyzing it, because his you, well, his statement. they are not sufficiently clear, specific and logically connected, that is, it is simply a pre-election struggle. ugh, well, what can you say about this plan, at least the latest peace plan of trump, which says that if kyiv does not want to sit down at the negotiating table with

moscow, then there will be no weapons, yes itself, if moscow does not want to sit down at the transition table, then kyiv will be provided. more weapons, well, what logic, what logic do you see in this? well, the fact is that trump has not yet become president, he has no foreign policy team, no plan, he has not yet faced the objective foreign policy reality. the fact is that what he says, for example, i see that he considers geopolitics from the point of view of a businessman, yes, they say that he has such a transactional ... entrance, so to speak, into foreign policy , but of some kind i don't see the specifics, by the way, he says that if he were the president, then such a large-scale invasion. against ukraine did not happen, and he says that he would, for example, use oil prices as a tool to counter russian aggression,

that is, he believes that putin is behaving aggressively due to the fact that he feels confident, having such extra income related to the sale of russian energy sources, that is , again, this is such a business-like approach, how could he solve this... the question and to fight russia's aggressiveness, but unfortunately, foreign policy is more complex, that is , there are many dimensions, not only economic, there are also psychological and political, of course, military, that is , there is simply no clear plan for today, but there is a desire to solve it question, i believe that trump, well, he starts with such a presumption, maybe with the fact that it is possible to... agree with putin, he has not yet fully faced, he has not yet fully understood that there are people, there are politicians with whom to agree simply impossible, and this is just the case,

the case of putin, well, when he understands this, he will start to behave completely differently, that is , he, i am sure that he will not stop aid to ukraine for one simple reason, he does not want, for example, to be criticized later for that he lost. ukraine and that he became the president of the new afghanistan, well, it means the withdrawal, the withdrawal of american troops. he wants to be a successful person, he aspires to be, he has, he is very ambitious in the good sense of the word, and he wants ukraine to be success, the success story not of president biden, but of president trump, if of course he becomes president. oleksandr, thank you very much for your comment. oleksandr moreshko, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the committee. on issues of foreign policy and inter-parliamentary cooperation was on svoboda life. thank you. thank you. well, let's return to the discussion of the nato summit. the irreversibility

of nato membership and more than 40 billion euros of aid is a summary of the 75th summit that ended in washington. he became one of the parts of this bridge, so to speak the ukrainian security compact, a security agreement signed by the leaders of allied countries with kyiv. the agreement, the signatories say, fulfills a promise president biden and other leaders made in vilnius in 2023, including long-term bilateral security agreements with ukraine to help it defend against russian aggression. in particular, this agreement envisages supporting ukraine's immediate defense and security needs, it is obviously about supporting the defense industry and the economy as a whole. from the words of ukrainian president, this agreement is a significant achievement. for ukraine and brings relations between ukraine and allies to a new level. during the summit, however, zelensky tried to get specific decisions, in particular, permission to strike

deep into russian territory with american weapons. if we want to save our country and protect it, we must remove all restrictions. biden has already given a clear no on this. the usa coordinates daily actions regarding ukraine and does not see the need to strike deep into russia with american long-range weapons. the correspondent of radio svoboda asked us assistant secretary of state james o'brien about the conditions under which washington might dare to give such permission to ukraine. under what circumstances can the usa allow ukraine to attack military facilities in the hinterland of russian territory. there is property in ukraine. weapons systems with which it strikes where it deems necessary. we said that our ranged weapons are subject to some restrictions. we want this weapon

to be used where it is best suited. these discussions about ours are ongoing weapons, but ukraine struck hundreds of kilometers deep into russia with its own weapons, and it is up to ukraine to decide. so, we have a discussion about what is most effective, but in the end, it is the territory of ukraine, it is the weapon systems. of ukraine and ukraine decides what is most effective. what is the usa afraid of by not giving permission to ukraine to be an american weapon deep into russia and in more detail what is this ukrainian compact, we will ask ihor zhovko, the deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine, about this now, he joins the svoboda program life. i congratulate you. congratulations. mr. igor, in the accepted ukrainian compact there is a clause that says that in case of the future. of russia's attack on ukraine, after the end of the current hostilities, the allies should quickly and collectively meet at the highest level to determine the appropriate next steps to

support ukraine when in... exercises its right to self-defense, self-defense, so says this compact, what is it different from what it is now? this absolutely repeats the provisions that are established in our country in 23 security agreements, bilateral security agreements that ukraine concluded during the whole year, when the g7 declaration on security guarantees was concluded at the vilnius summit, 23 documents, and in each of these documents it is said that the damage... of repeated russian aggression, or, as some documents say , even in the event of an escalation, the state that concluded a similar document, agreement with ukraine must meet with ukraine within 24 hours in order to determine new additional elements of military support for ukraine. so it is in 23 documents submitted by ukraine, and accordingly this provision is also recorded in the compact, because the compact is a generalization of the process that

continued during this year. this is very important, we did not have such a provision, we did not have anything similar in the budapest memorandum, so today we clearly understand that in the event of the next russian aggression , the world will react in a completely different way than it did so far. i wanted to clarify, that is, this agreement, this compact, it actually works only formally after the end of the current hostilities actions with russia? no, it's already working now, because the cd contains very important things. that, for example, ukraine should also further develop its future force, the concept of the armed forces for the future, and our allies, let's call them that, those countries that signed such agreements are already working with the relevant structures in ukraine today, the compact is working already today, from today, as it was signed, i emphasize once again, this is a summary and summary of what has already been done, a summary, summary and plans for

further actions, and a little about the results, were noted at this summit of nato cities, the irreversibility of ukraine's membership in nato, these are such pretty beautiful formulations, but in fact ukraine did not receive any time frames even for an invitation to the alliance, doesn't it look like are such unfulfilled promises? no, it doesn't look like it, because the wording that was spelled out both in the general final declaration of the nato summit and in... the bilateral document between ukraine and nato based on the results of the meeting of the ukraine-nato council, by the way, i will note that this is the first time that it has been signed a bilateral document based on the results of the meeting of the nato council at the highest level. was this wording worked out together with the ukrainian side? yes, i believe that the statement that the path to ukraine's membership in nato is irreversible is the positive one that we have today, so the next stage, and the president of ukraine spoke about it yesterday, is

membership. we are sure that the time will come when such membership will be fixed for ukraine. meanwhile, ukraine received quite significant practical results from this summit, it was already mentioned in your story about 40 billion assistance, i can also mention nato's security mission to ukraine, which takes cooperation between ukraine and nato to a completely different level in the field of reforming the armed forces, achieving interoperability, which is one of, let's say, the main criteria of nato. i will also say about a very... possible statement regarding air defense, this was adopted within the framework of nato, five new batteries were recorded, it was recorded that there will also be several new batteries before the end of the year, a very important statement about the f-16, which was also approved allies within the framework of the nato summit, well , we already talked about security agreements with you today, this process was born during the nato summit, it continued at this nato summit, and will continue until ukraine becomes a full member. asked

to give permission to strike with american weapons deep into russia, biden actually refused, was this a surprise for the ukrainian delegation and what are the future steps to convince the usa to give permission after all? see, the ukrainian delegation and ukraine are conducting negotiations at the appropriate levels on on a regular basis, our ministry of defense works, the general staffs work. the team of the president's office works, the head of the office, our foreign ministry works. yesterday, this issue was raised at the meeting of the delegation with president biden, we had a relevant conversation, i do not have the right to reveal the detailed content, to answer your question, i will say yes, we will continue to work. uhu, and what goals are ukraine mostly interested in deep inside the territory of russia?