all our blood, when everyone, including china or others, will understand that such principles as justice, international law cannot be traded, this is a rhetorical question, but this is the reality today, and the fact that the government, and the state and... politicians are different, and our public associations, well, they are very active in this issue, so this is, let's say, a guarantee that what we will achieve, yes, we will and we give hope, today with nariman met and, and he tells what i once felt, yes, that there is always hope... and that this hope gives them

the opportunity there is to hold on, it is impatient, but to continue to feel the spirit of a fighter, yes, because this is their front, this is the front of political prisoners, in which you have to defeat the enemy there, being in your own hands, actually. on june 25, ukraine won a case against russia for human rights violations at the european court of human rights. i am interested to understand how important this decision is and whether it is important at all, if we are talking about a country that does not count with any laws at all? ms. oglya, what do you say? of course, it is not just important, this is an unequivocal victory on the legal and field of ukraine, this is the first decision just right. which was in

the first interstate case, and it was filed precisely in crimea. the first thing that is important is that the court, the european court of human rights, that is, it is not a ukrainian court, but an international court, it recognized all the violations that occurred, violations of human rights, this is political persecution, this is discrimination, this is torture, illegal deprivation of liberty, imposition of citizenship and so on and so forth. everything we talked about for so many years has been recognized, recognized by the court, and what is important, it is unanimously recognized that the russian federation is responsible for all this. therefore, it is a legal basis for all other actions, now we talked about the fact that people suffer from various sufferings and so on, it must be constantly proven, now we have something to refer to, this is the decision of the european court of human rights, what else in the context of international practice in general, there were fundamentally new decisions that had not been made before, for example, regarding illegally created courts, regarding the practice of imposed citizenship, i.e. it will even affect the practice of other states, because the european court is a court that acts for all other states that are part of the council of europe. it is clear that the russian federation

left the council of europe, we know that, but this does not mean that this decision means nothing for the russian federation, again, this is a purely legal argument, for example, when we are talking about the same already created international register , regarding the damage, yes, which was caused to us by the aggression of the russian federation, for today, unfortunately, it includes only events from of the 22nd year, but this decision just proves that people have been suffering from human rights violations since the 14th year, including crimea, i believe that it should be used. to the fact that people have access to the international register, especially of victims of human rights violations, such as illegal deprivation of liberty, political prisoners, that people have since the 14th year, this applies to crimea and donbas, and we have legal justification at the level of just decision of the european court of human rights. further, it will be taken into account by all other courts that are considering it russian crimes, therefore, in principle, it is very important and it is the first one that so comprehensively and thoroughly speaks about the responsibility of the russian federation for everything that is there, well... probably in a more

applied context, after all, when we talk about european states, they are paying attention to the decisions of international courts, and this is just the right reason to help break russian narratives, russian propaganda about how wonderful it is to live in the occupied territories, that it seems that russia has come to liberate everyone, that's exactly what the decision clearly confirms that russia has come to kill, persecute and seize foreign territories, so i think that it is not only legally important, it has... that it is not informative to break russian propaganda in european countries, it is, unfortunately , there very serious, we recently conducted monitoring and mention of crimea in many european countries, so, unfortunately, crimea is not so much there, and very often crimea is mentioned not at all as we would like, in completely different contexts, and also, for example , not so long ago, in the same year 23, famous politicians could say and afford to say, even in europe, that things are not the same with crimea. significantly, because crimea

was still russian there and so on and so forth, so it is important for us to work with it every day, that is, it is a war in the information space, it continues constantly, russia has not spared turnovers, russia is just as powerfully throwing in the pile. money, a lot of resources in order to further promote everything that she considers necessary. and crimea is one of the key just such narratives bases of the russian federation, through which it will still seek to break these international agreements, such as on donbas, let's negotiate, and crimea will always be russian. if crimea is not deoccupied, not only will we not be able to protect people, we will never be able to return security to the european region, so actually this is a very principled decision that should be used as much as possible in that... including in the information space. mr. ehtem, you have a similar question, and i would also like to ask you how, in your opinion, it is possible to force russian federation to implement the decision of the european court of human rights. you know,

this case has been going on for almost 10 years, yes, ukraine against russia, and in that case there is also my case and... but here we all are in the majority for 10 years , our team, this is the state, it tried, well, i didn't i am afraid of this word, to force to fulfill first of all this law and this right, which was produced by itself, was produced by the institution itself, and the ecj, because there were always some moments. where inertia was very, very indecent, and i also had such an opportunity, when at such meetings it was frankly tell them in the face, because we were constantly faced with the fact that russia's influence on these

institutions is quite powerful, all this began, let's say, to become more active after the inter'. the people's criminal court recognized putin as a criminal, and gave him, gave him permission to resh, but then, in my opinion, these processes went faster, further, what, what does this give us, well, in addition to what our colleague already said there in the studio, but for example, i will file another lawsuit, and for russia to answer materially, that is, it will come, and whatever it turned out to be, i rely on these norms and the laws adopted by this institution, that

is, there is that they should fulfill their own norms, that is, there is also the property of russia in other territories. it exists here in ukraine, and it exists in other states, and it is fundamental, we must continue to pressurize these criminals so that they know that it is simply not like that, it will not go away, yes, as they are used to, but for us politically, well, it is very important, it gives, it has already been said that... there were such thoughts, the situation in the crimea is ambiguous, we are all, let's say, going through it very much - very, very, very with such persistence, yes, let's say, because that influence of russia is not going anywhere,

it is sometimes less, and then it grows again, and we must continue to be so persistent. and i just want to say about the crimean platform, especially the parliamentary dimension, which was already held on the territory of our european states, where we involved such a very influential institution as the parliaments of european states. which directly reflect and directly influence the opinion of their population , the people, yes in these states, and here is this platform, it is comparable there with the first one, it

has changed a lot in its messages, in its decisions, in our resolutions, that is, we will force, no matter how long... we will force to comply with these international norms and laws, which clearly state that russia is a terrorist state. such as russia, it will respond, as the russians themselves say, and i want to discuss the last issue with our guests, this is the issue of the rehabilitation of our civilian prisoners, i want to understand how it is happening today, and whether, in your opinion, ms. olga, should something be changed in this context? and improve, well, we definitely need to to improve, because unfortunately, unfortunately,

if we are talking about rehabilitation and medical services, this process is not well established today, we have more or less the procedure of providing material assistance that i talked about, and reimbursement of lawyers' expenses there. in the occupied territories, which are received by relatives in order to at least somehow keep in touch with people who are in prison, this is all in principle that works more or less normally, then the law that i mentioned, which ... guarantees precisely the protection of such deprived people will, it also clearly contains regulations on rehabilitation measures, on medical assistance there, and so on, but during the 22nd and 23rd years there were no regulations for this at all, that is, the government did not adopt anything so that, in fact, the norms of the law began to work, i.e., in 22-23 years, people simply did not have any due to this bureaucracy, not to provide the appropriate regulatory framework, people simply could not even take advantage of the law, which is already in effect, these changes took place only in the 24th year. when it is normal to at least approve certain procedures at the government level, but now, in principle, they must now be

actually implemented, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities and so on must be identified, again, this can be obtained only after there is a fact, when the commissions have established the fact, so we return to that category people who still can't confirm the fact of being in captivity, until they confirm it, accordingly, they can't apply for rehabilitation, if a prisoner of war , mostly it's all coordinated, because they all release... through the coordination headquarters, centralized, that is, they immediately receive all the information, they are placed in the appropriate measures and so on and so forth, then for civilians there is no such thing, especially the civilians who return on their way, about whom i spoke, the majority of them, that is, i believe that as soon as a person returns from the occupied territory, declares that he was a prisoner, or returns through third countries, and even through the border of ukraine here to us, there must be some unified mechanism when this information immediately reaches that ... and she is provided with this set of services, and not she walks through all the corridors, all

the institutions and begs for rehabilitation assistance for herself. for the most part, so far, the cases with which we work, where we helped prisoners and prisoners who returned to ukraine after captivity, they receive this help independently or at the expense of public organizations. the critical thing is, for example, well, it 's that everyone suffers from it, and i think mr. akhtem can confirm this, it's teeth, they all lose teeth, or... teeth are knocked out after torture, or teeth just fall out by the fact that there are simply terrible conditions of detention. one person who returned from illegal imprisonment is a crimean political prisoner, his teeth cost at least 150,000 uah this person, they were waiting where they will get such money, even 100 00 that the family can get after release from captivity, they will not cover these expenses. so of course this is just one example of how difficult and expensive it really is, we have this arrangement today, but we

we have to make it so that it is really easy to use for people, today it still does not work, so that people can receive rehabilitation, psychological and medical assistance without obstacles. ugh, well, we have such an unplowed field. mr. akhtem, i will ask you now, as a people's deputy, are you aware of such problems with... the rehabilitation of captured civilians and are you, as a people's deputy, the committee itself trying to somehow set up a dialogue with the government in order to resolve it? i am a people's deputy, but i walk on the earth, that's right said mrs. olya, i am his olga, i support him, because here... you know, here everything

is decided in the majority, where it is decided manually in this mode, that is, again, they turn to public organizations, which then and not only money, find people who would help them, that's right... i and my other colleagues do the same, and this example given by ms. olga, ms. olga, it really is what he showed.

"it's, let's say, i already know what problems there will be, but from the side of the state, from the side of the government, in this direction, so far, as it was it is said, centrally, so that everything is decided, which clinics will do it, which ones, for what money, yes, that 's it? , unfortunately, we want, we want quickly, but unfortunately, well, it doesn't happen, we can't do it so

quickly, so once again, i appeal again that as it was before, so today in... these issues before the state and first of all before the parliament, this will be the role of public organizations to engage in the state, this is not a conclusion, it is , let's say, such a reality today, do you understand? because i wouldn't say that public associations, they fulfill the role of the state, no, they are created for that, so that this state, this power, let's say, is more effective in these humanitarian issues, which

are necessary in today's realities well, i thank our guests very much for their time, unfortunately we have to finish already, i sincerely wish all the captured ukrainians and their relatives patience, strength and perseverance, knowing that this war will definitely end someday, believe that you will return home, artem lagotenko was with you, stay with us. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: russia's war against ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland.

topics that resonate in our society. drone attack. on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other cities of russia. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project: we are bored because there is nothing to fight about. let's make it up. they help to understand the present and predict the future. for the world, a second trump presidency will be terrifying. a project for those who care and think. politclub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. new week on espresso. weekly summary information and analytical program. a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts. forecasts of development situations for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join

the discussion. spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. new project. a day with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly every monday at 8:00 p.m. at espresso. events events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports on them. however, it was not enough to know what was happening. it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 1:10 p.m with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. studio event with anton borkovsky at espresso. see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. candidates for the vrp according to the quota. the president who angered the ethics council? i have nothing to do with this record. please excuse me. but who spent millions

on cars at the height of the war? so i came to the car dealership and bought them. greetings, you are watching judicial control, and i am tatyana shustrova. despite the full-scale war, ukraine continues its path to the european union and does not stop in the implementation of reforms, in particular the judicial reforms competition for the selection of members of the supreme council of justice. the ethics council elects candidates according to the president's quota. we will introduce you to the brightest candidates. but first to the news. there are 28 applicants for the single vacant position of a member of the higher qualification commission of judges. among the candidates are judges of the supreme court, the high anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appeal, judges of local judges and retired judges. vacant position. appeared in the vkk after a member of the vkk with a judicial quota, judge kyivskyi, voluntarily resigned on march 27 roman ignatov of the court of appeal. he held

the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. in 2022, as part of the judicial reform, the supreme council of justice still does not work in its full complement of 21 members of the vrp, currently there are 17, it has a quorum , and the selection of its members is ongoing. a collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors consists of persons, ten are elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two are appointed by the president, two are elected by the verkhovna rada. two more are elected by the congress of advocates, two more are delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors, and two more are elected by the congress of scientists and representatives of legal higher education.

currently , there is no representative of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi in the vrp. the selection is ongoing. to participate in 18 candidates submitted documents to the competition, eight of them had interviews with the ethics board, others either voluntarily withdrew from the competition or did not pass the preliminary stage. not all candidates. distinguished by a crystal reputation. today we will tell you who is trying to get to one of the most influential and key bodies of judicial power. this is olena zaichko, a judge of the kharkiv district administrative court. this is not the first time she has tried to become a member of the supreme council of justice. among her career achievements - making questionable decisions, making decisions during training, which is directly contrary to the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of property. in 2020 , olena zaichko approved. the decision to build 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this plot, according to another court decision, construction cooperative slice, which is part of the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy

ihor arykh, received permission to build. it is interesting that immediately after this decision, minors, at that time the children of judge zaichko, received an apartment from kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m2. the judge also likes expensive cars. in 2021 she bought a lexus for almost uah 2 million. our... colleagues from siledstvo info received recordings of telephone conversations allegedly of judge olena zaichko. the investigative information found out and released a whole material about how she goes to vorozhka there, does other strange things, but the most interesting thing is that she destroyed the disc with the audio recording of the court session. in an interview dated august 13, 2020, a woman with a voice similar to zaichko discusses with a colleague the possibility of spoiling the disc with the case materials, as well as ways to change the cherished judge. the decision to the contrary has nothing to do with it there is no record, i don’t know how to comment on this, please excuse me,

zaichko obviously implemented the plan to change the decision, she signed the decision to dismiss the lawsuit in the private room, she voiced the opposite in the courtroom, the members of the ethics council were interested in this story, everything that is recorded in the conversation coincides, and the person with whom the conversation is held also with... you sit in the sitting room, you prepare a document, sign it and say that, and then you, when you announce, say that the claim is not satisfied, how these events took place for four years because what motivated us, well, what motivated why exactly this happened, of course i don't remember, and throughout the interview, olena zaichko denied that it had anything to do with the audio recording. crowded with journalists, she assured that she does not know the people mentioned in it and does not remember any circumstances, complete amnesia, with this baggage olena zaichko is applying for the competition to the supreme council

of the right for the second time. judge. it is interesting that at the same time she is a member of the all-ukrainian association of administrative judges, which called on the president to promise a law on the reform of the administrative court, because it allegedly threatens sovereignty of ukraine, as it contains instruments of influence of foreign states. in this way, zaichko is desperately trying to become a part of the reform, which he considers to be a violation of judicial independence. not very logical. last year, despite numerous facts of dishonesty, the ethical council approved olena zaichko as a candidate for the position. member of the vrp, but was not elected by the verkhovna rada. in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko. in case of a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will eventually manage to slip through and sit down in her dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory.

the developer, who did not contribute, is to blame for everything. real estate in the register, so i lived in it, since the apartment was physically ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, since i did not have a confirmation, it was not entered until october 23 in the register of real estate, and in general lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that it makes no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether...honestly in his own big apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaration of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. the place of declaration is intended either for postal correspondence or, for example, for the exercise of certain rights, including political ones. more declaration does not affect anything.

vrp candidate vladyslav ivashchenko likes. cars he has a toyota rav4 talent cruiser 150. he bought the first one, allegedly, after selling three old ones, and by purchasing a new raav-4 from the salon in the midst of a full-scale war, literally saved millions of deposits. i came to the car dealership and bought them. i had a current deposit in my bank account, er, more than 4 million hryvnias in the amount, due to the fact that, er,... bombings began in the city of kyiv, i could not withdraw this money from bank account, and my wife and i decided to use part of this money to buy a new car. 3 years ago, the wife of vladyslav ivashchenko was very lucky, she managed to purchase almost 2 hectares of land near kyiv, for just $3,500. why does the value of a plot of land differ significantly from

the market price in this area? and this is almost 10 times, since this plot of land, it is located outside the settlement, it is actually intended for the introduction of agriculture, the more so there were shortcomings on this plot of land, it was swampy, even for this activity it was not quite suitable insists on his political neutrality, please tell me , do you consider yourself a politically neutral person, absolutely, were you a co-founder some public organization with people's deputies, were there or weren't there? no, never, but in the end i remembered how he was a co-founder of the non-governmental organization institute of political crisis, together with a former people's deputy, he does not consider it important at all,

a former political figure approached me from... he asked, let's say, for his status , i put my signature in order for a person to simply, let's say, have a type of public organization, er, without registration for a certain social status, also a candidate to the vrp, he forgot to indicate in his declarations his membership in the national bar association and the fact that he was arrested. to administrative responsibility due to violation of traffic rules, moreover, he believes that he should not have done this. let's see if, with such forgetfulness and lack of understanding of the rules for filling out documents, vladyslav ivashchenko will be able to sit in the prestigious chair of a member of the supreme council of justice. today i have everything. you watched judicial control, i am tetyana shostrova. inform us about the facts known to you