there are repeated appeals from representatives of these state institutions and services that are responsible for internal security. what cases of detection of what actions, let's say, for example, of these people, who, who have already been detained for the fact that they carried out activities in...

precisely to ukraine, that is, there are quite a few can be seen, precisely the security agencies, policji, inszych služb odpowiedalnych za bezpieku, same tam blisko do kordonu z ukrainą, where is the most important, important place for help from western countries for and finally, mr. dariusz, i would like to ask you that according to the results of the summit on... nato decided that a nato center will be deployed or created in bydgoszcz to study the experience of the ukrainian-russian war and use the best practices of countering russia for the alliance countries, is there anything known about further or current development of this center and how poland itself is now using the experience of the war to make changes in the training of its own armed forces and to improve models. weapons

produced by the polish defense complex, used by our armed forces, yes this center in bydgoszcz wine is currently at the stage of creation, that is, if it is at the stage of such an organization, it will probably take some more time, but if it is not very problematic, therefore at this moment, because it must be borne in mind that the experience of this war , the experience that he has, that i have...

thank you very much for these interesting and specific explanations. let me remind you that it was daryush maternyak, head of the poland-ukraine research center. these were the main military results of that day. yuriy fizar will continue the broadcast, so stay tuned to the espresso channel. well, i thank you

serhii zgurts, as always, in detail about the military results of the day, and in particular today about the military. cooperation, military cooperation between ukraine and poland, we thank our polish brothers and sisters for continuing to help us, despite the fact that relations between our countries are not always as we would like them to be. well, i, we invite you to join the project from zero to life, it is a collection of atvs, for atvs for the rapid evacuation of the wounded and the delivery of ammunition. support the soldiers of the 93rd with a donation of a separate mechanized brigade kholodnyi yar. our defenses'. the nicks win every day without leaving the wounded and dead on the battlefield, so atvs are indispensable helpers for evacuation, and they also allow you to move as quickly as possible on off-road, which means more effective performance of combat tasks. warriors who have already passed more than

one test at zero are always ready to retaliate against the enemy. for the sake of our peace of mind, they continue to rotate positions both on holidays and on weekdays. your support makes a big difference not only chances. to successfully complete the task, and to return from it alive, so join the collection, our goal is 4 million hryvnias. well, yes, it would seem that 4 million hryvnia is a lot, but every hryvnia of yours, if every ukrainian, every viewer of espresso gives a hryvnia, ah, sent to these qr codes or card numbers that you saw on the screens, then it will help we need to close this collection as soon as possible, our soldiers are ahead. get these atvs that are so important to them as soon as possible. well, let's move on to another first topic for today. so, the law of ukraine on ensuring the functioning of the ukrainian language as the state language. today is exactly 5 years since it was adopted. well, after all,

it was not approved today, not on july 16. it was adopted, if i am correct, on april 25 , 2019. then 270. eight deputies voted for it, 38 were against, seven abstained, did not vote, 25. on may 16 , 2019, again, i remind you, 5 years ago, it was printed in the newspaper golos ukrainy, but it came into force on this very day day, july 16 , 2019, so this law has been in effect for 5 years, i use this very word, it works, but does it function he, here... this is exactly what i want to talk about today with taras shamayday, co-coordinator of the space of freedom movement, who has already joined me on skype. mr. taras, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine. words to the heroes. here is the first question that i really want

to ask you: is the law in force, that is, it has entered into force, it has been in force for 5 years, but is it functioning, because there are a lot of cases that indicate that it is not very, for example, the people's mp of ukraine iryna. either yesterday or the day before yesterday, but i don't remember exactly , i wrote on my facebook page that she wanted to buy fruit in one of the fruit pavilions in pechersk, approached and asked the seller to speak to her in ukrainian, but the seller, i will use this very word here, because it somehow describes him best, so a little bullish, and he said that i can answer you either in english or in arabic, if you like it, so mr. taras, or? does this law function, well, of course, the law on the state language does not just work, it directly affects the language situation and national security of our state, i generally believe that this draft law, this law, is

still undervalued by society and the state today, it is one of the cornerstones in general. well, in the foundation of our statehood, yes, which had a very positive impact, not only on the language, as a means of communication, as a part of ukrainian culture, identity, in general on nationalism. and national security, the fact that the law is violated from time to time does not mean that it does not apply, for example, traffic rules are also violated, this does not mean that traffic rules do not apply in ukraine, so certainly, most of the service providers, most of the people who work there in the authorities, in education, in the media, yes, they comply with the law on the state language, and the ukrainian language has increased significantly. and this means not just uh, well, as i said, the phenomenon

of communication or culture there, it means that the russian world, russian cultural product, russian narratives have largely been displaced, and of course, the adoption of the law and its gradual implementation, which lasted, lasted for many years, in the authorities, in the media , in the sphere of services and many other industries, it increased the stability of our state in the conditions. full-scale war. mr. taras, but look, you say, i can tell you, you say that the ukrainian language has increased, yes, i agree, it has increased, compared to 2019, but today my colleagues and i came across an interesting study, so this study was conducted by the state service for the quality of education, it is a report, it says that in ukraine there is a tendency to decrease the use of the ukrainian language by ukrainian schoolchildren during lessons and in the breaks between them, and also... it is very interesting that high school students, a third of high school students reported that

they speak both ukrainian and russian during breaks, but mostly russian. one more very brief, one example of my own: i was riding the subway, and in front of me were sitting two guys, somewhere around the first and second year of the institute, talking in russian, at some point one of them, one of them, the phone rang, he switched and says: yes, mother, yes, i will arrive soon, i will be there in 15 minutes, that is, he is talking... with to his colleague in russian, but then switches to speaking ukrainian with his mother. tell me, please, what is the problem, who has the problem? the problem is, well, let's put it this way, it's not a problem that the law cannot interfere in the sphere of private communication, this is a normal sign of the civilization of our state, and otherwise in the european democratic legal system. cannot be, therefore the law on the state language does not regulate the sphere of private communication, but regulates,

i.e. the whole essence of the law on the state language boils down to the fact that every person has the right in one's own state to receive services and information in the state language in any field, and this is precisely what is provided by law, there are usually violations, but there are special institutions, in particular, the authorized person for the protection of the state language, to whom people can turn and... and violators are waiting the fine and in general society as a whole supports the law, but you absolutely rightly said that in the sphere of private communication a large part of people, including schoolchildren and young people , still use the russian language, and this is problem, here in order to solve this problem, because the really significant dominance in certain segments, in certain regions, in certain... age categories, of the russian language, the language of the aggressor state, is a huge

security problem, and this problem, on unfortunately, at the level of our state and at the level of society, to a large extent, it is not realized that there is, unfortunately, no consistent systemic language policy in ukraine, because language policy, systemic, is not the law on the state language, which protects the right of people to the language in official public spheres, this is the policy that promotes so... so that small children who are born, small ukrainians, so that they are brought up in the ukrainian language, and not their own parents, right now, right in the conditions of the war , russify their own children, and this is a mass phenomenon. it should be said that russia is an aggressor state, unlike ukraine, it has a strict and very systematic language policy, and this policy of an aggressor state consists not only in the fact that it destroys our printing houses and universities there, not only in , that... in the occupied territories it strictly implements russification, this policy also consists in the fact that

russia systematically promotes its russian and russian-language cultural product, we live, mr. taras, well then, look, with a lack of time, and then what is the problem, why can't we promote it in the same way as the example of russia, not by such methods as is being promoted by russia, and in a way it is more civilized, but why is this language policy that you are talking about not being promoted in our country, well, obviously, because first of all those people who... are in power, so they do not pay enough attention to it, and we not only can, we have to to do, first of all, ukraine should promote e... its own cultural product, diverse, especially that which is consumed on the internet, because the internet has no borders, and russia imposes its music, its cartoons, games, products for children , products for adults, and this is very dangerous, and this is one of the main factors why some people return to the russian language again, ukraine should actively support

the distribution and production and delivery to consumers by various methods of its books, films, music, etc. . it should be systemic policy that is not being conducted, secondly, the threat that russian kills must be formulated in general, yes, we cannot forbid people to communicate privately, we, for example, cannot forbid people to smoke, yes, but the state carries out a systemic policy, that smoking kills, that smoking is harmful, and pursues a policy that encourages people to give up smoking themselves, you can draw such a parallel, say, with the russian language, only the russian language is much more common. and that is why it is necessary to produce such a culture, let's say that it is generally ugly, it is uncivilized to address strangers in russian, even if you communicate with yourself, that by raising your own children in russian, you are taking away their future, the ukrainian future, that is, there should be a systemic policy, both at the level of communication, at the level of formation, and at the level of supporting

one's own cultural product. i really hope, mr. taras, that it will be so, thank you for participating in the program, it was... taras shamayda, co-coordinator of the freedom space movement , and we talked with him about whether the law is functioning on ensuring the functioning of the ukrainian language as a state language, i.e. i emphasize the word functioning, and not just being effective since 2019 . yes, let's move on to another topic, it became known a few days ago that a group of deputies, people's deputies of ukraine led by the fifth president, petro poroshenko, was not released. to the united states of america, they planned to take part in the convention of the republican party, representing, of course, the ukrainian people. why was it not released, after all, and about many other things, i will talk with volodymyr arev, people's deputy of ukraine, who has already joined me. mr. volodymyr, congratulations and glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. mr. volodymyr, the first question is whether there was

any motivation for this refusal from the president's office, or was it the same as yesterday, for example, we found out. that the press conference of volodymyr zelenskyi will take place, or rather, it is already taking place precisely from the mass media, no one informed us about it, did you get informed, or was there any motivation, here we are, you know, an interesting moment, we are already calm we are talking about the fact that the office of the president can lead the people by deputies of ukraine, although in fact it is not a constitutional structure at all, that is, it is not written anywhere in the constitution, the office of the president, it is not there, you will not find it. and the verkhovna rada is the highest legislative body, the constitutional body of the ukrainian government, and that is why, well, according to the law, the office of the president cannot interfere in the work of the parliament, in reality, today stefanchuk opened absolutely all the locks and gates so that the office of the president actually manages

the parliament through him, and in this case i generally believe... that there are still requirements of our western partners, we would like a resolution of the european parliament regarding the situation in ukraine, where it is clearly written in a whole paragraph that people's deputies of ukraine have the right on their own behalf or on behalf of their parties, which they represent, and do not engage in international activities and do not interfere with them. .. can’t be done, but if the obstacles remain, the resolution has not been implemented, regarding this particular trip, then i think that it was simply jealousy, it turns out that the president’s office does not have relations with the republicans, and this government, it became the first in ukraine to

violate the basic principle of cooperation with ours. strategic partner of the united states of america, which is called bipartisanship for ukrainian diplomacy, it was like a religion, that is, always bipartisan support for ukraine, both from the democratic party and from the republican party, regardless of who is in the white house today, whose administration, or whose , whose congressional majorities in either house, and this time...we're just going to have to work with either administration that will be elected by the american people, we cannot do that. to influence, and even if one of the politicians tries, as serhiy leshchenko once did, to influence the elections in the united states, it is for

external influence provided for by american law, criminal responsibility, criminal prosecution, therefore ukrainian diplomacy, ukrainian government, because diplomacy has several udders. it has a dimension, it has a classical dimension, that is, according to the ministry of foreign affairs, and it also has a parliamentary election, a dimension, to be able to speak, to be able to deliver messages from ukraine, information directly, because what donald trump, what gd veens, whom he chose as his vice president, and... in a couple for the elections, a candidate for vice president in couple for the elections, they both need very active work on the part of the ukrainian public,

the ukrainian authorities, and in general any, all ukrainians should use all opportunities to do the maximum possible and impossible in order for trump to change his mind about.. . countries, and the united states remains our strategic partner, and without it we cannot, once again , we work with that administration, it is good, but we will not work with that one, it is bad, it actually plays against the interests of ukraine, so if they do not release the invited to the convention of people's deputies, whom you wanted to see there, with whom you wanted to talk, then this does not play against poroshenko. and deputies from european solidarity, this plays against ukraine, because for those who turn this wing of the republicans against

ukraine, the only additional argument is that ukraine an anti-democratic state, and they are persecuting and obstructing the activities of parliamentarians there, so let's still work, let's not work with ukraine, that is, what was done. in fact, it was done, well, it was not done badly and it was not done to poroshenko, a blow was dealt to the possibilities of ukraine and ukraine, representatives of ukraine to prove their position in conversations with that wing of the republicans, which theoretically can become the administration in 2025. well, you used the word jealousy, it seems to me from the outside. office of the president, i think it is more fear that petro poroshenko will not go with his colleagues and that they will not create these connections just instead of the president's office, it's just

interesting, but i will tell you something, it can still be in a certain way and not only fear, after all and jealousy, let's not forget that zelenskyi is an actor, and they are very jealous of any opportunity that everyone else uses to get some positive, positive things for ukraine, they want to have an exclusive on this, that is selfishness, at least, and in this case a wise leader would use all opportunities to make ukraine successful, but an unwise leader does as zelensky does, because only he should be successful, and what will happen... with volodymyr, let's move on to another topic, ukraine, it seems to him, very clear. sir , the day before, there was information that nabu caught a people's deputy from the servant

of the people, mykola zadorozhny, on kicking back 3 million, 4,000 uah for the construction of a waterworks in sumy oblast, and at the same time, he heads the temporary special commission of the verkhovna rada on issues corruption and kickbacks in the construction of fortifications. you posted on facebook, i read it, it was described like this, this is your quote, it is so epic that there is nothing to add, maybe you will add it anyway, well, you know, as they said in the soviet union, who protects what, that and he has, yes, that is why in this case the person who investigates, under his leadership , the investigation is going on. possible corrupt actions in the matter of procurement of works for the construction of fortifications or procurement of drones and she herself

got into... kickbacks, well, this is obvious, at least, you can call it a conflict of interests, but really, this is such a cognitive dissonance that it would not be enough, he should not have headed the temporary special commission from today, however, when my colleague oleksiy goncharenko spoke on this issue today, the chairman of the meeting let it pass by. and the issue of the dismissal of zadrazov from the position of the head of the tsk on fortifications and drones, it was not put to a vote, although i do not know, well, this is some kind of surrealism, it is so absolutely surreal that i really have nothing more to add, and this surrealism, such with the green... paint, has been going

on for the last two years, and it, as soon as the government received unlimited powers, then immediately the old principle that corruption, that power corrupts, and unlimited power, absolute power corrupts absolutely, began to materialize in life and... right here in the pechersk hills, mr. volodymyr, we have three more minutes, i want to talk to you about one more thing, the intelligence officer roman chervinskyi was released on bail of 9 million uah, 25 people's deputies were finally released and separately, 51 people expressed a desire to take him as bail, and it became known that this bail was paid by petro poroshenko, in your opinion, this is only one winning moment in this

struggle, and i will call it this: the struggle with the office of the president, or not is this one, or is it a victory after all? i will tell you briefly, but obviously we have a judicial system, it is very sensitive, they have one point, mainly the fifth one, which is very sensitive to any changes in the political system, if they feel that the government is standing firm and unmoved , then they will always listen to the authorities. if they are, what already began, let's say, to push this government towards the trash can, then they will make decisions that do not correlate with the wishes of the government, what will happen next, i believe that the government will try to frame roman chervinskyi and do everything to get him back to jail, accusing him of trespassing.

violation of conditions of bail, and we still have a whole struggle ahead of us, but this is evidence that not even cracks have already appeared in that monolith, but whole pieces are already falling away, and what poroshenko has contributed today 9 million hryvnias without waiting for everyone to collect, and will offer the collected funds. still direct it to procurement for the military, then this only shows that we are ready to support any person who becomes a victim of the system, a victim of slander, a victim of fabricated cases, and in this case it is a small, intermediate, but still a victory, and of course we are very glad that roman chervinsky was able to get out of

butsygarny, maybe he will find... what time, and maybe then we will prove that he is there, we will prove it, we we want to prove that he has no place there at all, and he will get out of here in the near future, and i thank you very much, mr. volodymyr, for participating in the program, it was volodymyr aryev, people's deputy of ukraine. well, then the news, good evening, we are from ukraine, well... i'll start with this: ukraine will live according to the new time, the bill that cancels the transfer of clocks, which ukrainians did not like so much from winter to summer , was adopted by the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the decision supported by 261 people's deputies, this year on the last sunday of october in ukraine for the last time will move the hands of the clock to winter time, we will not switch to summer time, the document still has to be signed by the president.