to watch israel, well, i will also talk about the biopic films that we have, biopics are films about famous people, and why i decided to tell you briefly about it, to mention all these films in general, because there are two reasons at once, the trailer of the film about nazarry yaremchuk is out, we can watch it now, and i have already watched this film. at the mykolaychuk open festival, the audience there really liked this tape, they applauded, so it seemed to me that nazariya yaremchuk was too positive, and this is understandable on the one hand, because one of the, well , the daughter of nazariya yaremchuk, but maria yaremchuk, financed this film , but as i was told, she turned away so that they would not say that she was doing pr for this film, she just told me... the authors said she wanted to do a film

about a father, but we know that very often when a relative makes a film or writes a book about parents, about a sister, a brother, about a grandfather, grandmother, etc., it comes out a little fresh, because a person wants to present with with love to your loved one, and it turns out so very, very badly, and it seems to me that in this film he, although he is interesting, but nazarriya yaremchu... there presents himself as a very ideal person and at the same time an uninteresting character for me, and that is what is important, but let's look at an excerpt. he was loved by women, perhaps the reason for your arrival. we got on a trip to lavago, we got to india. america from new york to mayana. today is wednesday. you

agree, marry me on saturday, this tape will be released soon, be sure to watch it, there is a very good chance that you will like it, but in due to the fact that we usually have such a problem in biographical films, in documentaries, in games, i decided to raise it, to tell you about it once again, because really the heroes of the movies, or are they... there are fictional characters or not, they are often interesting because of their ambiguity, and if we look at our series, the main characters, the main heroines are often very uninteresting, and the negative heroes or heroines are interesting, and this is not wrong, because it turns out that well, the main character should be more interesting, right? we want to see nazarry yaremchuk, admire him, he is an ideal person without any flaws, well, we don’t want

to show us any scandals, no, just to show us an ambiguous, complex person, it’s always more interesting a film about mastafa dzhemilev was also shown at the odessa film festival, called the film "oxygen station". we have waited long enough for it, now we can see it. there are already many different reviews about it, some liked it again, many praise the visual, the visual side of this movie, you can see for yourself now that... the shots that are really very aesthetic, very memorable, they're beautiful, a lot of viewers like it, but again, when i watched this movie, i tried to count, how much screen time does the character of mustafa dzhemilova have, in fact, it is very, very little, and in fact, it seems to me that this character is not revealed, because there are many different other lines, here is his wife, for example, who goes to see him, and some others person'.

it turned out more than 7 seconds, but here you see yes, but again, i urge you to go to this tape when it is available for rental. we remember the film banned about vasyl stus, which also received a lot of mixed reviews, i know that many people really liked it, but in the majority... people, people thought that it was

such a film, well, a little outdated, it was shot by the way serial director, here we are... but also rather uninteresting, in my opinion, the main character, who was also very, very perfect, and i was struck again by what struck me, i simply noticed that vasyl stus's relationship with his wife is completely devoid of chemistry, and that his relationship was depicted as more intimate with alla uhorska, one of his closest friends, well, these are... full moments, our cinematographers have not yet managed to properly shoot, as i think it seems that you still need to practice, one of the first action films, the one who passed through the fire, you know it, but also, well, i don't know how much you can remember it, because the film is already old, it was also

perceived by many as something like that ukrainian film, one of the first about our military man, who had a difficult fate, but there was also a lot of criticism regarding the unnatural acting there. actors, a weak script and all that, but the film was unbreakable, well, i don’t want to mention it, it is one of the last films made together with the russians before the war, this film was already released, it seems , during the time when the war was, in the 14th year, collected quite a good box office, and we also had a film about taras shevchenko, taras the return, one of the few, in general, we have it's a wonder that there are so few films about taras shevchenko. our everything, our kobzar, is really not enough, and this film was shot by oleksandr denysenko, it is also visually interesting enough, but somehow the producers hide it, let’s say, it gives the impression that they don’t want to show it, although many viewers also asked, when they saw the trailer,

they asked, said where, where they can watch it, but not where. we also have a biographical film about paradzhanov, it seems to me that in this film, ah... the main character is as ambiguous as possible, as well as interesting as possible among others, that is, they tried to show him, well, as he was, as he was described, peradzhanov was eccentric enough, bright enough, he was able to say some rather sharp things, and for which he later got paid, of course, but this character to me it seems to be one of the most successful in our cinema among biopics, and we also know... do you remember the secret diary of simon petliura, simon petliura is also a very interesting character, a very interesting historical figure, we have one film, i also like him , what the main character is the majority of the trial, yes , the murderer of simon petliura, but he

was also the main character, who was not memorable, not bright, that is, in the history of ukrainian cinema, this film did not enter, also finally, let's look at the comparison. .. simon potliura in kruty, dmytro stupka played him there with muravyov, this is exactly the case when the main, when the negative hero, you see, he is much brighter than simon petliura muravyo, in this film the main pagan came out, but he came out much more interesting, brighter than all the others, of course, it cannot be like that, and i hope that in the next biopics this problem will somehow be eradicated, not... i don't know how, but i hope that they will. that's all for me, friends, i ran to the closing of the odessa film festival and i'll get back to you from there, maybe in an hour and a half.

there are discounts, they represent the only balances on evrofast softcaps, 10% at travel pharmacies for you and savings. there are leftovers. represent the only discounts on mikrolax 20% in travel pharmacies for you and save there are discounts represent the only 10% discount on norwend express forte in travel pharmacies will be available exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends , the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia is already on the verge of exhausting its resources. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they able to use, let's say, the resources of the allied with

them of lukashenka's army? vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, read the whole discussion, accept my union, thank you, it was difficult. it was just interesting, but it was absolutely not , they help to understand the present and predict the future, they offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. politclub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. the premium sponsor of the national team represents. united by football, stronger together. keep going war, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. well, we are we are engaged in propaganda. russia

is throwing millions of petrodollars into turning ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become russia. let's counter the information attacks of the russians in the chronicles of information war project with olga len. tuesday, thursday at 17:15, repeat tuesday, friday at 22:00. verdict with... with serhii rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback connection, you you can express your opinion on the evil of the day with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and tune in, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, from tuesday to friday from 8 to 10 p.m. glory

to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the tv channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events this week, in particular, we will try to predict how american, and therefore global, politics may change as a result of the no longer ephemeral coming to power of donald trump in the united states. our guests today are matthew bryza and andrii pionkovskyi. the espresso tv channel will be on the air now. matthew bryza, former adviser to the secretary of state of the united states, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, glad to see you. glory to the heroes, so what, the assassination and attempt on the candidate donald trump. we understand that there are much more questions in this story than it seems at first glance, but the key story is how it can affect not just domestic american stability. it can affect global world politics and in particular to the russian-ukrainian war,

we understand that now donald trump, thanks to his injured ear, he now feels almost the winner of the race, and this also worries us, because the current president of the united states can act as a so-called lame duck, this is dangerous the situation is primarily for ukraine. i think that the effect of the attempt will not be long standing. seeing the sympathy he would evoke among american voters. so the immediate effect, of course, is to energize trump supporters, and i think that he must have attracted the attention of many undecided voters by appearing so strong and determined, but the real problem is the weakness of president biden, the physical and mental weakness, who is now unfortunately suffering from the coronavirus. i think that after the debate with donald biden , americans look too physically weak to do the job, or even to win

the election. i think that's how it is. as long as biden remains the democratic nominee , i think it's almost 100% possible sure that donald trump will be the next president, and the democrats still have some time to either nominate another candidate, for example, camila harris, she is the most obvious, or hold a short, something like mini primaries. several democratic candidates could compete against each other and try to become the nominee, but that would require president biden to agree to resign. so, again, to sum it all up, the assassination of trump has given him some short-term support, but i think for for a few weeks, people will forget about the assassination, and all they will remember is that trump seems much stronger physically and mentally than biden. yes, i agree, both candidates are, so to speak, not of the first political freshness, but the situation can be,

well, just kidding, critical for ukraine, so we already have a new vice president of the united states, and we understand that he was not one of the sympathizers of ukraine. donald trump promises to offer his plan, donald trump's plan will always rest on what and who is in power in the kremlin, yes, it is a very, very difficult situation. but as you see the unfolding of the current situation, when we are talking about the ukrainian issue and the russian-ukrainian war in the united states, that is, these are now a few months of extreme... will miss this window of opportunity. yes, sorry, forgot to answer this question. first, on a cautiously optimistic note, it is important to look very carefully at the fact that the vice presidential candidate, j.d. vance, said about russia's war against ukraine and

the nato alliance. the good news is that j.d. vance, unlike president trump, has never... cast doubt on the importance or value of the nato alliance, nor has he ever said that he does not want ukraine to win the war, or that he wants russia not to lose. he didn't say such things. his main argument was that the united states should not provide such disproportionately large aid to ukraine, far greater than the us's european allies. since the european allies live next to the ukraine. he makes the argument that if european allies ... had continued to spend on defense after the cold war for the past 30 years at the same rate they have, they would have spent, he says, about $8.6 trillion more on defense than they have , and so he argues that if the us spends about 1/3 of a dollar a year on defense, and the europeans

in total lag behind by 8.6 trillion, then they should catch up, in other words, they should... catch up to the us, but in any - in any case it is clear that jd vance will support president trump's position on ukraine. yes, trump has repeatedly said that even before he takes office, he will essentially put pressure on both sides to push for a cease -fire, regardless of whether that means ukraine having to give up the territory it has been occupying russia. and you know that trump has obviously always had a crush on vladimir. putin, as well as other world powers such as viktor orbán, it is currently unknown what exactly is included in trump's plan, but orbán, as we know, visited trump immediately after the nato summit, declaring afterwards that he knew about trump's plan, and so orbán went to meet putin. it looks like orbán is trying to play some kind of intermediary role in the implementation of trump's plan, but the bottom line is

that if trump wins, we definitely won't see the same level of support as. which were ultimately acceptable to ukraine. actually, we in ukraine would not like to be cheated by big and powerful world players. we understand that the issue of the russian-ukrainian war is not only a bilateral russian-ukrainian issue, it is an issue around which the whole world is currently working, only a large part of that world, unfortunately, can support putin, and accordingly, what should we do right now so that we are not replaced by those... people who will support this plan of viktor orban. in fact, this plan is most likely agreed upon in both moscow and beijing. it is not easier for us in ukraine because of that, and we just have to survive and win. actually, i would like to ask you what is the danger of viktor orbán's so-called plan and whether there are any prospects for trying to push through this plan,

promote, impose on ukraine those environments that are possibly associated with trump. maybe not related, but if orbán's plan is so much talked about in various cabinets, the european union completely rejects it, it means that this could be some kind of trade offer from the kremlin. orbán has not announced publicly what exactly his plan contains, but it can be assumed that it will be some kind of ceasefire, under which ukraine will definitely have to give up some territory, maybe i don't know, it could be something like that on the so-called istanbul proposal. in march 22, according to which, as if ukraine agrees to remain neutral, never to join nato, russian troops will have to withdraw their units from the territory they have occupied since the full-scale invasion, and the future status of crimea and donbas will be determined in perspective this was a preliminary offer. i don't know what orbán's proposal includes, but

it doesn't really matter. i don't want to sound impolite, but i will say that viktor orban in this matter... he is nobody, just a leader a small central european country. he has no authority. charles michel, the president of the european council came out and said the same thing. he said that orban has no authority. the legal department of the eu stated that orbán violates eu policies, eu rules and eu legislation. therefore, he has no authority to negotiate on behalf of anyone. and, as charles michel also said, nothing can be resolved regarding ukraine. without ukraine, therefore, orban's plan is irrelevant, it will become relevant only in that in the event that trump is elected, who will take it and try to impose it on ukraine, but i don't think that the european ... allies of the united states are like that, and how this difference of opinion between, say, donald trump's washington on the one hand, and brussels, paris and rome,

for example, and then london, on the other hand, will be drawn. i can't predict right now, but i personally think that orbán's plan means nothing if trump doesn't support it, and orbán just makes it clear that he is not a friend of the transatlantic family. yes, i'm with you i agree, but from the second. everyone is aware that orban does not play, orban, as orban, he does not play any important role, so here i completely agree with you, but he is an emissary, he brought what was agreed in moscow and possibly in beijing, i even i don't understand, yes, because the so-called istanbul agreements or negotiations, or rather yes, they were based on the fact that russia withdraws its troops from our newly occupied ukrainian territories, yes, and the issue of crimea should be pushed aside somewhere. well, accordingly, complete disarmament ukraine, but putin is now going back to the so -called istanbul talks, but he is completely

changing them, actually changing them and bringing them to an absolutely absurd kind of appearance, which is that they are going to annex those territories that they have not even captured, that is, the current talks putin about new istanbul, so they are completely irrelevant to what was said. then and so on, we understand that putin is playing his game, and the current situation for him is just a new platform on which he wants to land, after, as possible, donald trump would become the president, that is, i see exactly this unfolding of the current situation. i completely agree with you, if we recall march 2022 and the istanbul statement, then the main representative of ukraine at the negotiations said that he was ready to accept it on the spot. a compromise, but his russian counterpart had to go back to moscow to get approval, which he never got. so now putin, as usual, is lying and pretending that

russia was ready to accept the previous wording. now, as you just said, mr. borkovsky. putin is not even talking about the original istanbul formulation, but about his method of action. in an interview with tucker carson, putin said something incredibly outrageous, especially for an american with polish roots like me. he said that poland attacked russia or the soviet union in september 1939, again completely twisting history as in the case of katyn, so he is doing it again. putin pretends that ukraine should have agreed to the annexation of these territories, which russia did not even occupy, and tries to look peacefully, hoping to create the necessary momentum with the help of orbán's emissary, and yet, i think he will fail. the truth is on the side of ukraine. one more thing about orban. for many years, his foreign policy was based on special relations, including economic and currency relations, both with moscow and

beijing. a former senior hungarian official responsible for this policy told me that they didn't want to talk about it publicly, but it was something they did with their hands. to a large extent, it's just money flowing to orbán, rather than principled politics. dear mr. ambassador bryza, what are the prospects for holding the so-called second peace summit? yes, we understand that the kremlin says one thing publicly, behind the scenes they send other signals, so there is a feeling that one or another indirect negotiations between the main capitals of the world are ongoing, yes, well, we did not want it to be at the expense of ukraine, but in any case in any case , the prospects for a successful second peace summit, something like what happened in switzerland, but... with a very specific fixation of certain parameters. i don't think it has any prospects at all if success means a deal that ukraine will accept.

i remember being very worried during trump's first presidency, when it was obvious that he was trying to get a deal with putin behind ukraine's back, which was some kind of compromise, maybe like the istanbul declaration, in exchange for some cooperation from putin in syria . always exists. the danger that if trump is elected, he will try to make such a deal with putin without consulting ukraine, but this will definitely not happen at the peace summit, this is an agreement that does not meet the interests of ukraine, and it is obvious to me that as an organization the european union and the vast majority of its member states do not want ukraine to be forced to end the war as a result of the peace summit, if it is not ready for this yet, it will some pressure in this direction if there is still... such a peace agreement from some participants, but i do not think that the european union and nato support forcing ukraine to end the war without liberating its

territories on its own terms. dear mr. ambassador bryza, how about ukraine, our president, our ukrainian authorities, should do the right thing in the current situation, right? well, because we understand that donald trump is not donald trump per se, and it's not even the republicans, we understand that there are very different approaches within the republican party of the united states, right? donald trump is also boris johnson, yes, elon musk recently met with him, and in general, he represents a certain economic and global. environment, and we understand that he will voice certain things, perhaps by himself, maybe it will be some kind of collective decision, a collective manifestation of a certain political will, and i really would not like donald trump to say, listen, you are in ukraine, i will give you two or three months, come to an agreement with the russians there, otherwise i i won't give you help, so we understand that not giving help to ukraine is a stab in

the back, that is, the situation is unacceptable. but given the way trump can conduct negotiations, this could happen, and therefore we need to act as soon as possible. firstly, boris johnson doesn't really have any influence, because donald trump has all the power, even elon musk may be the richest man in the world and have more followers on twitter or x than anyone else, but he doesn't have any real political power, so now he chooses to support donald trump's course. is trump the one who will make the decisions in the united states government and can he really do exactly what you mention? in my opinion, ukraine can continue to do what it is doing, but perhaps it should be stated more clearly: we are a sovereign country with a democratically elected management therefore, dear mr. trump, if the united states, god forbid, were attacked by mexico, canada, or anyone else, you would insist on the right to fight as long as

necessary. to restore your territorial integrity. at some point , the ukrainian leadership will need to clearly state this. at the same time, of course, ukraine must win on the battlefield. yes, we, the usa and europe, must provide the promised weapons systems. but ukraine definitely needs more soldiers on the battlefield, which is a very difficult domestic political issue ukraine. so, i would advise ukraine to speak clearly and clearly, and b - on the battlefield and continue to put pressure on the usa and europe. pressure europe, in particular, because trump and vance are actually right that europe has for too long not spent enough on its own defense and has relied on the united states to carry the burden of what is essentially a huge tax imposed on the united states by its allies president zelensky would be wise to find a way to strengthen this argument. the us has done a lot for us. but

europe, maybe trump is right, so are you more needs to be done. if president zelensky had made such an argument, trump might have been more sympathetic to him in the event of his re-election. well, i recently spoke with the former marshal of the polish senate, bohdan borusewicz, and when i said that the european union, well, it was fitting that they give more money, yes, because there is a situation that can become critical after the arrival of trump and after he will conduct its negotiations. well, to which borusevich said, yes, well, we understand that the united states is everything one thing is that they are richer and their budgets are bigger, that is, this is a kind of story, and donald trump, i don’t think that he will come up with some new scheme, newer than what i will announce now, that is, he will say in our official kyiv, listen , you have to do this and that, or i won’t give it to you, he will say to the russians: listen, you have to negotiate, otherwise we will give ukraine additional weapons, lethal and

maybe allow... to strike deep into russian territory, not 100 km, by 500 or by 1000 km, so it will generally raise rates, but knowing, for example, putin, he will simply, i don’t know, conduct another ballistic or tactical or non-tactical nuclear weapons training, after that we will stand on the threshold of the caribbean crisis, after that everything will go down, the level of stakes and the level of aggression, but i fear that it will all happen at our expense, i just don't see that putin is ready. something to concede, maybe i'm wrong. returning to the comment of the ex-speaker of the polish senate, it should be noted that it does not completely cover the whole picture. economy the economy of the united states is not as large as that of the european union. the european union has a stronger economy. the problem is that member states have decided not to have large defense budgets like the united states. this is exactly what trump is talking about.