the press secretary of the president and the president of ukraine himself do not say what this last obstacle is. do you think this is a technical obstacle or a political one? let's say so, and both components are present. and another logistical component. is there now, does ukraine now have the technical possibility to launch these f-16 fighters. for them to fly in ukrainian skies and take off from ukrainian territory? well, this is another issue, we will discuss that a little later, well, now, but a little later, i will explain what the political component is, it means that there are solutions, for example, some enterprises that will provide complex repairs of these planes should be located in poland, in addition, the depot where, let's say, where the spare planes will be, we are already... they are handing over

planes, well, they should hand over in total more than, it seems, more than 60 planes there, yes , but, well, gradually, but still they must accumulate somewhere, they must not stand on ukrainian territory, perhaps we are talking about the actual bases where these planes will be stored, in addition, poland bought four simulators for these planes from an israeli concern elbit, that's high. simulators that completely simulate the cockpit, and they, these are not simulators, these are actually high-level simulators, after them the sessions are immediately transferred to the two-seater version of the plane, which means, obviously, the issues of training our flight crew, training, for example, there, well some questions, well, don't forget about logistics, because the planes need to be provided with weapons, spare parts, so

maybe some components there, well, repair recommendations, specialists, that is, i think that the question was discussed the deployment of aircraft and repairs, and the russians said, well, not against, let's say, we, that's the last person we listen to, but still the russians say, what if the planes are just deployed. in some country, let's say, they don't mind, but they allow, they allow such an option, yes, well, and this issue had to be agreed with our allies, exactly in which country, because the fact that the preparation is taking place in romania, no one asked the russians, but there is a base, that is, on which the european training center for f-16 aircraft is deployed, romanian pilots are also trained there. and

the bulgarian ones will be preparing, and i understand that the slovak pilots and the ukrainians were supposed to be preparing since the summer of this year, but the base is still being completed, that is , i don't know if there is any information there, that is, these issues had to be resolved, but other questions remain, are our pilots ready for combat and is our infrastructure ready for combat? a perfectly logical question that comes up all the time when it comes to f6. could it be possible to do with foreign pilots, those already trained in the f-16, perhaps those who are not are in service, but know these planes very well, would it not be possible to contract them and speed up this process of the f-16 entering the ukrainian sky, a purely political question, you understand, if the united states allows such a practice, it happened during the second world war, the united states, until now... but they fought with japan, well, they

started there from december 41, the japanese attacked them, yes, and before that there were american volunteer pilots, who fought in china, the tigermite unit, oh , no, not a tigermite, well, that is, flying tigers, a unit that from from about the 39th year, he took part in hostilities, shot down, actively shot down japanese planes. that is, there were precedents in history, so it would have been possible to do this, but there the pilots were allowed to do it, there was a politician, there was a political decision, they were not against it, the state was not against it, is there now a political decision from the pentagon, not sure, not advertised, but there are those who want it, and don hampton seems to call up an american lieutenant colonel, an experienced pilot, who has many shot down, er...

so there was him, he said what about him a whole squadron is ready to fly in and take part in battles, experienced pilots, but rests on a political decision. mr. valery, as president zelensky says, ukraine's air defense has significantly strengthened, a new patriot anti-aircraft missile complex has arrived from germany. let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said. i want to thank germany and the united states for this step. in heaven we will be able to do much more. of course, there is still a lot of work ahead, and this is far from a guaranteed protection. and... nevertheless, more power to ukraine. it is obvious, mr. valery, that both now and in the event of concluding an armistice or peace agreement with the russian federation, ukraine will obviously have to think against it, about anti-aircraft defense. in

your opinion, how should this air defense be rebuilt and what does ukraine need for this? well, it must be, first of all, it must be compatible with nato, and i think that all the old soviet systems will simply disappear, due to the lack of ammunition, they will be fired, the ammunition will be fired to the beech, and the ammunition is there, well, already beech is being rebuilt for american ammunition, yes, the beech, the cube is being rebuilt, that means, and then the s300 will disappear, well, where, too. take ammunition to them, they were produced only by russia, here are radar stations, old soviet and ukrainian, of ukrainian production, they will remain for air defense, and air defense will be better integrated, now there is an automated

control system, but there is still, well, well, let's say this , i am not sure that it is 100% compatible with the old soviet ones. and ukrainian and modern western systems, that they are 100% compatible and according to the main parameters, yes, they are really compatible, and now the planes will arrive, they too, this is also an element of air defense, and whether our forces are able to work with the tactical information exchange system 16, all western systems, that is, all the patriot and ... sams , they all work, and ariste, too, poling-16 , that is, first of all, full integration with the western system and among all its elements will be required, this is the first point, secondly, well, i listened to some of our specialists, for example

mr. butusov, yes, whom everyone highly values our military experts, and the military in general as well, he says that, for example, we do not have... a centralized system of radio-electronic warfare, but there are good stations in bukovel, there are a dozen other stations, but firstly there are not enough of them, secondly they are not united into a single system, and rap is one of the elements, there are anti-aircraft missile systems, radio engineering troops, fighter aircraft and reb, and all this must not only be united among itself into a system, but also included in the general system. automated air defense control system, system control of the automated, entire air defense of the country, the anti-missile defense elements that we now receive from the allies, the patriots that you mentioned, and

the sumpti system should also be included there, because there is also a very important element, the actual warning about russian missile launches. in addition, all this must be integrated with western means. we also look for western satellites. so, that is , there are quite a lot of tasks before our, let's say, theoreticians who are working on this. by the way, ursula funderlay, who became president for the second time of the european commission, supports the creation of a pan-european air defense system. that is, i understand that europeans want to create something similar. some kind of iron dome around or over europe, or can we in this situation claim that we will also be a part of this european air defense, no not within the framework of nato, it is clear that most of the countries of europe are members of the north atlantic

alliance, but before joining to nato, whether there is such a possibility and whether there is such a chance for ukraine to join this common european one after all. air defense systems? no unfortunately, there is none. because, you know, there is such a thing as identifying one's own. so no one will tell us the nato codes. that's why everyone. our planes that will fly into the nato territory of, say, any country, yes, they will be considered enemy planes, and aviation will rise to intercept them, yes, that is, until we are not a member of nato, until then we are not an element of nato's combined air defense once we become a member of nato, and nato's flying radars provide... location coverage from above, not from below, as we have now from ground radars,

but from above they provide us with an overview of the entire territory of ukraine, plus there a hundred or two hundred kilometers of russian territory, and reconnaissance satellites generally provide information about activities, about any movements, let's say, in russian airfields, but until that time, we do what we want, although we are provided by... global hockey is also provided by avaks, these are scouts, and other systems, they provide us with information, but this is, let's say, operational communication, it is not a system element. thank you, mr. valery, for the conversation, it was valery romanenko, an aviation expert, and friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms in youtube and facebook, for those who are now watching us live there, please take our survey today. we ask you about whether trump is able to make putin stop the war, yes, no, everything

is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, if you have your own opinion, a separate opinion, please write it in the comments under this video. if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote for the appropriate numbers. if you think trump can get putin to stop the war, 0800-211-381, no 0800 211-382, all calls for a price. numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with oleksandr kraev, expert of the ukrainian prizma foreign policy council, americanist. mr. oleksandr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. yes, congratulations, good evening to you. well, all the attention of the world is now focused on biden's statement that he is withdrawing from the election and that he is from the democratic party of the united states of america. kamala harris will apply for the post of the head of the american state. tomorrow, biden has to make

a public speech, because this statement about withdrawing from the election was in writing. tomorrow he promises to appear before the public. this is what this decision of the current president of the united states of america means for the united states, for ukraine, and ultimately for the whole world. first, it brings us more. instability, more, well, let's call it that, unpredictability, because even though harris has a very good brand so far, harris is raising funds very quickly, it still creates unpredictability because we knew biden wasn't going to get new voters, we knew biden was going to have to play into his old game, and biden will have to hold on to the entire base electorate, and khaharis as a much younger candidate, as an essentially new one. on the federal political olympus, although she was the vice president, but

rather inconspicuous, we understand that this will slightly change the electoral sentiments, it may slightly reshape the american electoral field in general, and this will be exactly this innovation, if we are talking about politics, including executions, by the way, regarding ukraine, i would not expect certain innovations from khariz, well, first of all, we can already see the position of donald trump, he does not have a clear position on ukraine, so we have to work here literally... on a case-by-case basis, and to say the least, her lack of experience in the foreign police and the presence of advisers from the biden team , i think, will make her to leave the same position regarding ukraine, i.e. full support, provision of weapons, but at the same time no certainty and hardly any real strategy. donald trump has already stated that it will not be a problem for him to defeat kamala harris and sociology. says that the vice president, the current vice president of the united states of america,

kamala harris, in a potential pre-election fight with donald trump, on average , trump leads the vice president by only 15%, and the washington post writes about this, what do you think trump's strategy will change candidate from the democratic party, because trump actually wanted to focus on proving to his potential rival biden, about his age, or about his forgetfulness, that for the second time trump can go to the... finals of the race with a representative of the democratic party party, how successful can garis be in her current race and debate with trump? well, to say that the trump campaign, let's say this, she has already started looking for something

to drown kamaharis with, they are already working on understanding what topics will be against her to work, because it is... completely different, a different understanding of further processes, this is no longer biden, who can be run over for an old man , you can drive in for some reasons, this is not the same biden, who absolutely does not change anything in his views, this is a new candidate , a new candidate who has a similar strategy, but needs something new to find information to work with, so now mr. trump's company is clearly concentrating on finding such places of protection. if you start putting pressure on them, but if we're talking about the chances in general, how the further campaign will take place, well, first of all, we have to wait when she announces her vice president, when she announces her team, what she is going to do, when we saw some strategy expressed in some document, but after that

we have to two key theories, the harris company will be exclusively. on the fact that we are voting for someone who is there, let's, let's, mr. alexander, let's, let's still for our viewers, let's give a brief background, who is kamala garis and what are her chances for presidential elections of 2024. kamala harry began her career in legal practice. a big breakthrough was that in 2003, harry became the district attorney of san francisco. and worked in this position for two terms, and in 2011 became the attorney general of the state of california, so she was the first african-american woman with indian roots to hold such a position. her political career took off rapidly in 2016 . haris entered the house of representatives from the state of california and entered the judiciary

committee. she distinguished herself with sharp interrogations officials and nominees. to the trump administration. at the end of 2016, harry became a senator from california and entered the upper house of the us congress. in the senate, she instantly became a star. actively appeared on television, spoke sharply about the alleged russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and clearly stated her position on the key problems of american society. harry also got lost among the initiates. trump's impeachment proceedings, because of his drive against ukrainian president zelensky, from whom trump tried to obtain classified information on biden and his son hunter. kamala harris announced her desire to run for president of the united states from the democratic party in 2019. in her speeches, she criticized joseph biden,

in particular for the school segregation program for black children, but because of little support among. of americans, garis dropped out of the race and later officially supported biden's candidacy. at that time, he had already become the undisputed leader of the race among the democrats. the future president of the united states has announced kamala harris as his candidate for vice president. and this election became historic for the united states of america, because a woman took this position for the first time. harry became a fan of many americans, including those. districts where democrats were disappointed. kamala haris voiced her position on russian aggression back in 2014. she condemned the occupation of crimea and donbas. after the start of the full-scale war, the american repeatedly stated that supporting ukraine is strategically important for the united states of america. this war

remains a complete failure for putin. he calls not for negotiations, but for capitulation. america supports ukraine not as charity, but because it is our strategic interest. donald trump has repeatedly tried to discredit the activities of kamala harris. among his complaints is gary's stance on taxation and army financing. however , political experts assure that such statements of trump are a fear of the strong and professional figure of garis. soon, a democrat and... a republican may become direct competitors for the presidential seat. today, i am proud to have received the support i needed to become a candidate. from our party, over the next few months i will be traveling the country talking to americans about everything that matters, i intend to unite our

party and our nation and defeat donald trump. who will become the final presidential candidate from the democratic party will be known at the august 1922 convention in chicago. well, already. it is known that kamala garis collected 81 million dollars in one day to participate in the election campaign. let me remind you that today, oleksandr kraev, expert of the ukrainian prism foreign policy council, americanist, is on our air. mr. alexander, can we witness that this election campaign is going to be based on a conventional scheme of a prosecutor and a person on one side and a person who is ... in trouble with the law trump, well, harrison and trump? well, in fact, this campaign is already set up this way. moreover, let's not forget that garix

was generally known as one of the toughest lawyers and toughest prosecutors in the state of california in the 21st century. she really is launched a very broad fight against illegal migration and drug trafficking, against organized crime, so this is exactly her key image. this is what they know about her, that she is remembered, at the moment when a lot of americans, well, let's say, did not notice her almost in the position of vice president, then in the position of the prosecutor of the state of california, she really gained , well, in fact, the significance and fame of the federal level. mr. alexander, how likely is it that, for example, biden can early to leave the presidential chair and in such a way... in accordance with current american legislation, kamala harris can become the acting president of the united states of america and in this way increase her potential, political potential

in the next six months, well, let's put it this way, there is a risk and such a development of events, it is necessary to understand that this will be a crisis situation and a crisis situation , including for the democrats, a crisis , including for the gvars themselves, because they will definitely use the opponents, it will definitely be considered, well, let's say, wrong management, this will definitely play into the hands of the republicans, because so far the only ones calling for biden to resign are the republicans themselves, and in fact, to take such a step now is to do it before the elections, that is , to rise to their provocative and very sharp tone , so really you are absolutely right, on the one hand it can help harris to increase visibility, to increase some showiness for... general ratings, but at the same time it is too risky, so far it clearly plays more into the hands of the republicans. mr. oleksandr, he remains in office for six months

to president joseph biden, he has repeatedly said that his biggest victory is that he stopped putin, can biden in the current situation take additional steps, strengthen steps regarding assistance to ukraine, regarding permits. to beat ukraine on the territory of the russian federation with american weapons, in such a way, well, on this note, on a high note , to transfer the authority or, let's say, to either kamala harris or donald trump, who will already win, it will be determined by the americans, whether we should expect sharp movements in the eye of six months? let's put it this way, such drastic moves would be logical, such drastic moves would be correct. that's exactly what biden needs to do, and he's worked in those administrations, essentially the obama administration, which was known for

being able to take the most radical, most unexpected steps in the last weeks of his term, in fact, of his entire previous term. , so i see no reason why biden should not take such provocative steps against russia, against china, against all opponents of america in general, in the last months or weeks of his tenure, because on the one hand... if we say that trump suddenly wins there, he creates a climate for his opponent in which he will not be able to make friends with russia, even if he really wants to, and if we are talking about kamala harris, if she wins, then biden will give her, conditionally speaking, an america that is ready to go on the offensive, an america that will be decisive, and this will also be positive, both for harris and for the situation when trump is president. another very short question, i hope it will be just as short response, regarding boris johnson's plan, which he revealed to the daily mail, but implied that the plan could be trump's. is this a plan for the capitulation of ukraine, is this a necessary step to start negotiations with moscow

in your opinion, let's say that moscow perceives as a necessary step for ukraine to capitulate, this plan, it is more like a new iteration of the minsk negotiations, well, i think here it is already clear to our viewers that the minsk talks, neither they nor capitulation are suitable for us in this regard, but the only thing for us is that it is necessary to conclude from this, and this is the only positive note here, that in principle the trump administration, if johnson is to be believed, is not ready to fully give in to the russians and fully implement their plan, and this is already news to us. typical, that is, this is what will allow trump to suspend the war, as he promised, and ukraine, well, for some period of time, to get time to restore, renew the ukrainian army, and it will depend on how we use this time, whether we really will we be able to complete the transition to military lines, will we be able to agree on new supplies of weapons, or with you can adequately continue the mobilization, that is , it can give us a pause, but after

the pause... the russians can push again, and everything will actually depend on our society, how it will use this pause. thank you, mr. oleksandr, for the conversation, it was oleksandr krayev, an expert of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prism, an americanist, and friends, i would like to remind you that during our broadcast we conduct a survey, we ask you about whether trump is able to force putin to end the war , let's look at the intermediate results of this survey: 15% - yes, 85% - no. there are discounts representing the only discounts on estizifin 20% in pharmacies of travelers and savings there are discounts representing the only discounts on eurofast softcaps 10% in pharmacies of travelers and savings there are discounts representing the only discounts on mikrolax 20% in pharmacies of travelers and savings there are discounts representing the only discounts on normoven 10% in pharmacies for travel memories and savings. vasyl zima's big broadcast, my

name is vasyl zima, this is a big broadcast on the spresso tv channel, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, me and my colleagues will talk about the most important thing, for two hours, to learn about the war, about military, frontline, component, serhii zgurets, and what the world lives by. yuriy feder is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening, please. two hours to keep abreast of economic news, time to talk about money during the war, oleksandr morchyvka is on the field with me and sports news, i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, about cultural news, alena chekchenina, our art watcher, ready to tell, good evening, presenters, who have become languages ​​for many nrodnidenko is already with me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you, good

day, events of the day. in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening at espresso. every week , the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and the world. vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. do you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow? watch the saturday politics club every saturday on espresso. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresin had done so, he would have gone to prison, a special view on the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish is rotting

from the head. no, not off the top of my head. but for her. sunday 18:15 at espresso. congratulations, friends, live on the tv channel. the second part of the verdict program, my name is serhii rudenko, and in this one part we will talk about this. the dead end of the moscow patriarchate. opposition factions blocked the work of the parliament due to the delay in banning the uoc-mp. who in the council covers the enemy church. competition of peace initiatives. the johnson-trump plan against orbán's peace mission and xi jinping's proposals.