and the government cannot ignore the position of the people, and it seems to me that this is a very dangerous trend that you just announced, referring to the kmis survey, because it reflects the weariness of society, and here a very big responsibility, based on these data, is precisely in power we well remember that at the beginning of the full-scale aggression in march, the authorities made a certain mistake when they started to initial the so-called istanbul agreements, which now kremlin dictator putin uses in any contacts of his representatives with representatives of the civilized world, therefore today the ukrainian authorities and the entire ukrainian society must necessarily demonstrate completely different trends than are happening now. and the first trend is a very clear compliance. those values ​​that

united all ukrainians at the beginning of the full-scale aggression. we must not make any concessions regarding the ukrainian identity, regarding the language, regarding our faith, regarding those values ​​without which the state is simply unthinkable, and when there was a certain departure from these values, this and prompted the kremlin to full-scale aggression against ukraine. if we talk about johnson's words, which are now very widely discussed in politics, i see that these words are starting to be discussed somewhere in society, let's first of all note that johnson is a really famous politician today, just like trump, but johnson today does not represent the government of our one of the biggest partners of britain, just as trump does not represent any power today. congress

of the united states of america, and we must always, in response to messages of some kind, always take into account whether this is the official position of the state, or whether today it is a certain discussion of politicians, perhaps even in the context of election campaigns, which is also important to take into account. today, there is a very clear position of our western partners, the united states, britain, and the countries of the north atlantic defense alliance, and it... speaks of full and unconditional support for ukraine. after all, this support today is expressed in the supply of weapons, and this support today is expressed in financial assistance for ukraine. today is very important from the ukrainian authorities not to accept any of its statements, any positions, this also applies to parliamentarians who would raise doubts in ukrainian society. on the contrary, you have to look for those. grain

that unites ukrainian society, and today the three biggest problems that are annoying, that are the biggest problem for the ukrainian people today are, firstly, war, secondly, corruption, and thirdly - energy, and when the ukrainian authorities will demonstrate, in relation to these three problems , a very clear position, that is, concerning wars, this is support for the armed forces of ukraine, which concerns... this is corruption, this is a merciless fight within the country against those who embezzle funds, with those who are corrupt today, and with regard to energy, this is a very clear plan of action that would show that ukraine can restore our energy capacities, protect them, and thus, if we demonstrate very clear consistent actions in all these three directions, if these actions are based on non-violence. foundations of ukrainian

identity, believe that then the mood in society will change, and the mood in society, no politician will then be able to make any compromises, any agreements that will harm both today's and tomorrow's ukrainian state. thank you, mr. olezh, mr. nikita, i wanted to ask you, well, you obviously heard about vitali klitschko's statement in an interview with coriera dlsra, an italian newspaper, where he said the obvious. zelenskyi, zelenskyi will have a difficult period, well, as well as ukrainians, not only zelenskyi, but they say the ukrainian president will be forced to submit to a referendum the issue of territorial concessions or whether it is worth considering them or not, vitaly klitschko says this out of ignorance or misunderstanding of what the constitution of ukraine is, it is valid. and

that no referendum can actually take and cancel the borders of ukraine or question or in some way legitimize the fact that... that these territorial concessions can be in some kind of agreement? eh, mr. serhiy, i didn’t quite understand what the question was, i think that vitaliy volodymyrovych, well, it would really be worthwhile to refresh a little, that is, knowledge the constitution of ukraine, and in general , it seems to me, to concentrate more on the questions of why historical buildings are being demolished in the middle of a white day in kyiv despite... all the prohibitions of the ministry of culture and other bodies and who is doing it and for what money and how long it will continue, and not to engage in such geopolitical, so to speak , thinking, well, a referendum - people fall

from cable cars and drown in broad daylight, but it seems to me that kyiv... we seem to have lost contact with mr. poturaev, now we will restore this connection and let's continue our conversation, well, in the meantime , in fact, both in ukraine and in the world they are talking about the second peace summit and the possibility of russians participating in this second peace summit, the head of diplomacy of the european union, josep borel, said that the next peace summit should... take place with the participation of russia, but not on putin's terms. let's hear what he said. i am convinced that president zelensky will continue to insist on these negotiations in order to have the next

conference with the presence of russia. it's real, definitely. we have already talked about that the next step requires the involvement of russia. but how should one perceive that the president said during prime minister orban's visit to moscow: look at the preconditions put forward by putin. yes, of course, we should hope for peace through diplomatic negotiations, but on a certain basis, and this is not putin's basis. so, we have mykhailo tsymbalyuk and oleg sinyutka on the air, we are now resuming contact with nikita poturaev, his light was turned off, so in principle, for now... we are fixing the telephone connection, mr. oleg, what josep borel says that the russians should have peace at the second summit, but not on putin's terms, we know putin's terms, can russia

join this summit if putin's terms are not accepted by ukraine and the world, well, about joining the next peace summit, for the first time. it was not josep borel who spoke, as a representative of the foreign policy of the european union, ukrainian officials started talking about it for the first time, president zelenskyi spoke about it, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine spoke about it, they talked about it representatives of the president's office, and today, when we hear these statements from the mouth of the head of foreign policy diplomacy of the european union, he cannot speak differently than they started talking about it... the highest officials of the ukrainian state, that is, it is obvious that the european union, european diplomats publicly maintain the position they have always voiced, that there is nothing without ukraine, and today they are saying what, in fact, has already

been proposed by the ukrainian authorities, whether it is appropriate to talk about it today, well, we already have meeting in switzerland or not? the first peace summit, where, which was organized by ukraine, which was organized by the ukrainian authorities, and i understand that after that, in this format, we did not move closer to peace, closer to the de-occupation of ukraine, so today european diplomacy, i am convinced that unison will also the representatives of the american government should also speak, they say exactly what the representatives of the ukrainian government are saying, because it is obvious that... there should be a change and the representatives of the ukrainian government should be the first to talk about it, it should be the ukrainian transition plan, the ukrainian peace plan, it is very important that during the talks about this, ukrainian

principles are maintained and respected, they will have the right to life and be implemented, the stronger the ukrainian army will be, the stronger the ukrainian economy will be, and the stronger the unity will be. will be preserved in ukrainian society, that is why i would not rely on josep borrell here as the first source, especially since today there will be changes in the european union, including... we know that the position of supreme representative of the foreign eu politicians are already claiming and another person will be appointed, so i would rather look here at the signals that the ukrainian authorities give, and we must understand that our partners will act in unison with the signals that the ukrainian authorities will give, so far we have heard statements from the president about the next meeting involving russia, it's... um, quite a dangerous road, it's a road with a lot of challenges,

because we see that where the kremlin is, there 's bound to be treachery, there's going to be duplicity, and the kremlin always will act based on their interests, and their interests were and remain, this is the destruction of ukraine and ukrainians, a very dangerous subject for conversation, and the most important thing here is to preserve unity within ukraine and a single... front with our western partners, the inclusion of the countries of the so-called global half a day to a unified position in order to put the aggressor in his place and for the aggressor to pay all the bills and for all the damage he brought to ukraine and to ukrainians. as for unity within the state, as for unity in power, here we are today saw how the verkhovna rada of ukraine could not pass or put in order. the question of the day is about the second reading of the law on the banning

of the moscow church, mr. nikita, we are glad that you have returned to us, and i know that you have a principled position, that you are in favor of banning the branch of the russian orthodox church, the moscow church in ukraine, but members of your faction did not support this initiative together with the former... deputies of the opz governor, although, why are there no former, former opz members, with representatives of the opz, a banned party in ukraine, could you explain the situation, what is it in your faction, why is there no unity on this issue even in your faction? so, i would like to dot all the dots at once and, first of all, non -opposition factions did a protest today, all factions... that support law 8371, including the servant of the people faction. i

want to remind you that of course we are grateful to absolutely all our colleagues, and i am grateful to mr. oleg and his colleagues, mr. mykhailo and his colleagues, and to everyone who is not on the air today, but our faction gave 130 signatures and will give 150 votes for this law. well, so that we simply understood the scope, and the fact that our representatives in the conciliation council mistakenly this morning, obviously, not having assessed the mood in their own faction, did not support it, and thus we were forced to conduct, together with our colleagues from other factions of the groups, er , this protest action near the rostrum, which was crowned with success, because after that the conciliation council voted that... at the next plenary session, the verkhovna rada will start its work precisely with the consideration

of draft law 8371, and we did not go to vacation, did not go on vacation, and we did not have the will to go on vacation either, and this is a question for the members of the conciliation council, in particular, for the members of the conciliation council from other factions of the groups, why they all agreed with the decision to take such a decision now.. i believe that there was no need for this, moreover, according to our calculations, if the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on in the verkhovna rada hall today or tomorrow, there would be at least 240 votes, and i am surprised by the decision. conciliation council, surprised, i hope that they will explain to us all, both mr. oleg and mr. mykhailo, what were the motives, what were there. act, what was the explanation for it, that they all voted unanimously

to consider this law only in the month of august, so i would ask, mr. serhiy, this is not a claim, i understand that you are working there with the information that you have, but i asked you to place the accents correctly, so wait, you have a majority in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, if you cannot with your majority... make decisions on bills without participation of the european solidarity of the motherland or with their participation, then you must admit that you have some problems in the faction, if any... the fateful law banning the moscow church cannot be voted by your faction, well , there are definitely problems, can other factions of the group without us to vote this law? no, they can't, so let's still treat the majority with respect, because 150 deputies are the overwhelming majority

of the faction, servants of the people, and not to make such, you know , generalizations, servants cannot do something there. not they can, they don’t want to, they don’t, the regulations of the verkhovna rada, as you know, are structured in such a way that without a decision of the conciliation council , nothing can be put before the verkhovna rada for consideration, which actually happened, unfortunately, again, i emphasize, unfortunately, our the representatives in the conciliation council made a wrong decision this morning, then they corrected it, because in the end, in the end... the decision is unanimous, protocol, that is, it can no longer be changed by the conciliation council, which took place against the background of our protest action, joint protests, was that the verkhovna rada would consider this law first at the next plenary session, only i believe that it could be done tomorrow, well, but the conciliation council, once again

, was unanimous, i would not like anyone to remove from itself political responsibility, unanimously decided that there will be... some other consultations, some other working group, we in the committee do not understand what these consultations are for, we do not understand what kind of working group it will be, but this is what the conciliation council decided, and that after of these consultations, the verkhovna rada will meet and consider in august, it will start its work by considering the law 8371, this is the joint political responsibility of everyone, without excluding the members of the conciliation council. thank you, mr. nikita, mr. mykhailo, i am... that even the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe officially recognizes the russian orthodox church as an instrument of russian influence and propaganda, which has nothing to do with freedom of religion and expression, but in your opinion, why the draft law, which was introduced by the cabinet of ministers, and one and a half

years cannot reach the final stage, what is the reason, in the conciliation council in... the conciliation council, in the political will of the leadership of ukraine, maybe someone does not want to offend the russians on the eve of possible peace talks? well, first of all, i also want to start with the fact that the verkhovna rada did not go on any vacations. the verkhovna rada is working, we have, for example, a committee meeting next week, and the meetings of other committees are ongoing, there is a lot of work, except for the session, that is... when the parliament works in the session hall, i want to believe that the nearest one of these days, after all, there will be the political will of all factions of the groups to vote this bill in the second reading this year, by the way, the first reading was passed, my colleagues will correct me, probably, or november of last

year, that is, there was enough time, and i thank mr. nikita, to the committee and to all members of the committee, it seems to me that this draft law has been very well finalized before the second reading, today it was said that a working group is allegedly needed to clarify or refine two more amendments, i think that the committee can do without a working group, if such is needed, then these are 2-3 days of professional discussion and work, and we can meet already next week, because the session is not interrupted, we do not close. meeting and at any moment the decision of the agreed council will be brought to all the deputies and during the day we will meet as usual, because of that i want to believe that we will not delay, but today's action had its achievement, because the consolidated decision of the leaders of the faction of the groups was indeed adopted ,

that the next meeting, whenever it takes place, will begin precisely with the voting of this important matter. bill, i don't at all a supporter of any blocking of the presidium, the rostrum of the verkhovna rada, especially during the period of martial law, but today it was a forced measure, as a sign of the majority's position, i am sure of the majority of people's deputies that we cannot ignore the rules of the regulations and, moreover, the signatures that were at least 226, i agree: if the question were raised today regarding the inclusion of this draft law of his on the agenda, we would definitely have more than 226 votes: the question is very fundamental, it belongs to the sphere of national security and defense, and indeed we must give the mechanism of the security service of ukraine, other law enforcement agencies

, to act clearly in matters of collaborators, in disguise and those bordering on treason. by the way, before the second reading, there were significant amendments or proposals by law enforcement agencies, in particular, security services. which were included as amendments, and this will enable them to work more effectively in the security and defense sector. i am confident and believe that the verkhovna rada will adopt this bill by august 20. for it has all the prerequisites. i think that the political will will be found after today's discussion in the session hall and in the office of the speaker of the verkhovna rada. thank you, mr. general. mr. olezh, what are the reasons for such a long delay in the adoption of this decision, and what consequences can this delay have

for ukraine and for ukrainian society? well, the reason for delaying the obviously necessary decision for the national security of ukraine is clear. there are agents of the moscow church in power, because i simply cannot explain today's events in any other way, because today is real. a historic day took place, of course we would very much like this historic day to be marked by a decision to ban the largest moscow intelligence network inside the country, and it is a great pity that this decision did not take place today, but look what happened today, the consolidation of the parliament took place today on other grounds and on completely different values, the truth - says mykyta potoraev, when he says that... more than 100-150 representatives of the servants of the people were ready today, as well as representatives of european solidarity motherland to support this bill.

it is obvious that not only the signatures, not just some virtual number 226, but the real signatures of the people's deputies who said that we will vote for this bill, they are there, and they are with the speaker of the parliament. it is obvious that everyone was present in the hall today. those deputies who are ready to support such a historic ukrainian decision, but the question really arises, why did it not happen? well, first of all, respect to the head of the profile committee for humanitarian policy, mr. nikita potoraev, who very clearly, very professionally, the first reading, the discussion between the first and second reading, the second reading in the committee, together with our colleagues mykola knyazhytskyi, volodymyr vitrovych, sofya fedina, supported this bill and passed a law that is legally flawless, that does not contain any violations, that will not give any a starting point

for challenging this law, this is extremely important, secondly, what is extremely important today is the understanding of how events developed, because we can truly say that the conciliation council did not support the introduction of this bill this morning, but let's be honest, how does the conciliation council meeting take place, all representatives of all factions and groups can vote for any decision, and only with the voice of a single person, the representative of the servants of the people , a completely different decision can be made at the conciliation council, because the servant of the people today, where yure has representation of the largest number of deputies, he actually decides the agenda with his vote, and this morning it was this representative of the servants of the people with the support of... two more former members of the opz, who now represent the groups, because they already are ashamed to present themselves as a banned political force, they voted

not to put this issue on the agenda, and when the discussion took place in the hall, you have now seen the most vivid shots of this discussion and the position of deputies of all factions, i want to emphasize all factions, from european solidarity to parts of the servants of the people, i will use them today. the position of those who do not want to do it, here is the position, obviously, this is the position of one person, this is the position of the speaker of the parliament stefanchuk, then stefanchuk, having such a consolidated decision, we do not have a lot of time on the air, if possible shorter, because stefanchuk, having a consolidated decision today, could go out, put it to the vote and vote, he did not want to do that, so today a situation occurred when the leadership of the verkhovna rada does not... reflect the position of the majority of deputies, including the majority of the people's servants, and i think that here we need to ask a very clear question to a very specific addressee, that is the speaker

of the verkhovna rada stefanchuk. and those whom he represents in the parliament and in power, why this issue was not voted on, i am convinced what we will hear a little later, we will already see in the decisions of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. gentlemen, thank you for participating in the program, oleg sinyutka, mykhailo tsimbalyuk and mykyta poturaev were guests of our program today. throughout our broadcast, we conducted polls and asked you, friends, whether trump is capable of forcing putin to end the war. 15% yes, 5% no - these are the results of our television poll, friends, i put a full stop on this, it was the verdict preview program, serhii rudenko, take care of yourself and your dear friends, goodbye, national tv on mego - too many channels, well, too many

channels, and also f cartoons, tv series and favorite shows. turn on megogo on various devices without any wires or antennas. and all this from uah 49 per month. there are discounts representing the only discounts on exoderyl, 15% in pharmacies plantain, you and savings. in the latest edition of the magazine ukraine. interview with eustratius zorya about challenges for the ukrainian church. the problem of the institution of reputation in our society on the example of mykola tyshchenko. in viktor's article. lada vvedenska about the difficulties and challenges of military medics. the country is always at the forefront . search at press outlets or pre-pay online. there are discounts representing the only discounts on fcalor 10% in travel and savings pharmacies. fm, galicia.

listen to yours. there are discounts that represent the only discounts on estazifin. 20% in pharmacies of travel memories and savings. the book women at war is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and duhi-litera publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories. fate, 20 women, who stood up to protect the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores of ukraine. with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation. there are discounts that represent the only discounts on glycyset and glycyset max. 20% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. see this week in the program.

dovy control with tetyana shustrova. a year of operation of the updated vkk. does the commission work effectively? this is a very important body, which direction depends on who are our judges. but how does the commission save the unscrupulous representatives of themis? four months have passed since the promise, nothing is being done. on thursday, july 25, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. new week on espresso. weekly summary information and analytical program, a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week, the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andriy smoly, every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso.

greetings, it's veterispress news time, kateryna shirkopoyas works in the studio. three people were injured as a result of an attack on a vine in kharkiv region, four more local residents are being sought. all affected employees of the critical infrastructure enterprise. this was announced by the head of the regional administration oleg senigubov. the russians also fired missiles at kharkiv. as a result of the attack , a large-scale fire broke out at the civil infrastructure facility. information about victims are currently being specified. and in the morning , the russians hit the office of a humanitarian organization that was demining with a ballistic missile