trump is just voiced by her johnson, well , here i think of two points, mr. serhiu, you know, in any negotiations you have to show a potential partner the whip, but at the same time show a carrot, well, which can encourage him to at least start talking, but they say we'll see there. for some reason, it seems to me that, well, boris johnson, who is credited, we still... do not know to the end that he stopped the capitulation in istanbulbul, then he should be offered to ukraine so that we, let's abandon what was as of february 24, 22nd year, well, that's it it's simply illogical from any point of view, the russian language is even more so, well, that is , it seems to me, or it's just such a throwaway yes to the fact that, well, ukraine. they will not

agree to this, but perhaps the idea is that they say, let's try to drag russia into negotiations in this way, and there we will see what will come of it, especially since britain is now, well, the most powerful partner that provides weapons, which helps to effectively demilitarize crimea, the loss of crimea, you and i have already discussed several times, this is the beginning of bad things for putin processes further, that is, such an option is possible, but you know, mr. sergey, i think that... now, by the way, another column by pompeo, ex-secretary of state, another plan has appeared, trump is already there, destroying putin to zero , everything is already there by way of langleys, and already 500 billion, well , that is, another option, that is, you know, it can all be a game, that is, look, here one powerful friend of ukraine says, well, look, we will do this, well, russia for now shut up, well shut up, fine, then... you have the second option, and

now we'll give you something so that you're cold, this batih is being pulled out, then there was, then there was, then there was a carrot, there was a batih, and here we go, but you know, it’s all bad, in fact, why is it bad, because we’re always waiting for some kind of plan from someone, well, the question is in the problem, and we are so weak that we cannot formulate our plan, well, they will say so, no, i am, there is zelensky's three- point peace formula. no, well, mr. sergey, it’s not even about that, it’s a formula, it’s an idea, it’s a thesis, and it’s correct, that is, well, who will say something against the thesis about territorial integrity, yes, it absolutely logical, but let's simply decipher it and write what the restoration of territorial integrity means, well, it's simple, again, like a 90° angle, that is, for this you need to receive the appropriate military assistance. for this we need to receive

appropriate financial assistance, for this we need to strengthen sanctions against russia, for this we need ukraine to start the production of its weapons in a powerful way and so on, for this we need to have the appropriate force, so to speak, manpower , which, which can to use all this in order to gain victory, and to say, we have these factors, after a certain number of days we get... a completely different situation in crimea, and then in the south, and then in the east, and so on. do you remember, the republicans kept saying what are we spending 60 billion on, where is the plan, well, finally we can sit down to write our plan, which will be presented not just as a plan for ukraine, but as a plan for the victory of the west over russia, they are really starting to understand , that this is the greatest evil. look in the washington document of the nato summit, russia.

the first enemy, at the previous one was china , so they already understand that china is needed here, let it be, then we will see, today is russia, so let's unite and create a non-ukrainian plan for ukrainian victory, a joint western-ukrainian plan , so to speak, of joint victory over the enemy, the fact is that the task is insurmountable, and we do not have people who can write what is needed, well , maybe president zelensky claims that... that he should have his personal plan, this is development, mr. sergey, this is development of his ideas, this is not a denial that in place of such a plan there will be some others, no, we simply take these theses, which are key for us and paint them and make it so that it is clear to everyone, both in ukraine and abroad , then the republicans will say, yes, let's fix this point here, let's, here let's change this and let's, and then we have a joint plan, you know, and then we, and then we all... say, guys, yes, no , you don't

ask us such, don't ask us such questions, this is our joint plan to win over na over the enemy, you already mentioned mike pompeo, i will still quote what i wrote to our tv viewers. he for the wall street journal newspaper, he said that if he wins the presidential election, trump will introduce a $500 billion land list for ukraine and remove restrictions on weapons that pompeo writes. this is what a successful plan for ukraine might look like. introduce real sanctions against russia, strengthen american defense, revive the nato organization, create a lendlease program for ukraine in the amount of 500 billion dollars. also ukraine can be accepted into nato and from the eu. according to pompeo, it is beneficial for america, because then europe will assume more obligations regarding the security of ukraine, and we have the synchronicity of donald trump, the candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, who said on fox news that in a conversation with president zelensky told him about the need

to end the war. let's hear what trump said. president zelensky called me and we had a good talk. stalin, there, for the soviet union, after all, it was a collective victory, especially for russia, the more on russia, because... you asked, he is more likely to write about lend-lease, and if there was no lend-lease during the second world war, what would the soviet union have beaten the same hitler, so that's all, well, here let's leave it to trump, he is an eccentric, he is a person who speaks so emotionally about something, maybe

it is not quite accurate, but the thesis is correct, that is, he is actually talking about the fact that russia, this putin's russia, must be finished. because she is the greatest threat to all, and again, you and i once said that we do not study psychotype politicians, trump is a businessman, he says the same thing, if we take ukraine into nato and the european union, then the issue of ensuring security will be entrusted to the europeans to a greater extent, and we will pay less, that's what i say all the time, you just have to understand who are you dealing with, prepare for these coups very seriously and offer those arguments that will be understandable to your partner and that will benefit him, do you remember, somewhere in some other plan, and this is boris johnson, it was said that there are americans can be replaced in europe by ukrainian ones, and it was about

70,000 ukrainian soldiers, but can you imagine what this amount is for the american budget, yes, it really is not tens, it is hundreds of billions of dollars. so if trump counts every penny, says: i don't want to spend it on something that we don't need, well, yes, well, in the end, why not, why not help him, that we need to rearm all of europe? well, look, there is a queue for, not for the f-16 in europe, for the f-35, there are queues at the eye, air defense systems, and at the same time, there are well... only zelenskyy says to us, we need 125 of these, patriots, how many of them are needed in europe, so it’s not 125, it’s 500, maybe 25, and each of them costs one billion 200 million

dollars, that is, if you look at it , what it can do for the american economy, the economy, believe me, i think you don't even have to be trump to understand that it's beneficial, so why do i need you? when we formulate our goals, we need to understand very clearly and clearly who we are talking to and what we are talking about. we understand what to talk about with trump, you understand what to talk to trump, and what to talk about with kamala harris, because in the current situation, well, it turns out that somewhere after the debate between biden and trump, it was clear that trump has a better chance to win the presidential campaign. this year, biden does not go to the polls and takes probably the most unexpected step, probably not only for the world, but for himself, because kamala harris, she is 19 years younger than donald trump, and this is all the rhetoric prepared by

trump for biden, what he said, he almost has dementia, that he forgets himself, that he can't manage the state there, it's just... just falling apart, and it's obvious, well , sociology will probably show there in august what prospects kamala garis has, whether it will change. the politics of the united states of america, if kamala harris becomes the president of the united states of america, you know what i would talk to her about, well, it seems to me only one thing, that we need to put an end to the indecision of the democrats on security issues, because if she continues this line of obama, biden and further, then we will be waiting again half a year to decide on this or that. supply of weapons and so on, this pseudo-pacifist line of the democrats

really needs to end, and if the matter were to turn to practical negotiations, then i think that we need to convince her that such a line will not be a winning one for her, but a losing one, and that , that she has good chances now, well, as they say, only the lazy don't talk about that, because she's a woman. she 's black, she's a prosecutor, she has, so to speak, every chance to show that she offers a just america, against the backdrop of what trump is getting caught up right now, really, he, he's indicted in at least four cases, and she's the prosecutor, and she 's saying, and she's saying, who are you going to vote for? me as a representative of law, justice and order, or as a person against

whom four cases are currently being conducted and it is not known how they will end, and there is also sexual harassment, that is, all these sexual things and the like, then you want for the president to be someone who will attack women and the like and so on, humiliate them and everything else, then you know, well, that's it the matter of technology, i think there are a lot of people there. who can tell her what to do, it's our job not to interfere in these processes and so on, but now she really has a good chance to turn the situation in her favor. at the very end of our program, mr. volodymyr, i would like to ask you about the statement of the minister of defense of poland, władysław kosyniak kamyś, that ukraine's accession to the eu depends on a solution. historical issues, and he stated this in polsat news that he said, in my opinion,

real politics should put ultimatum, without solving the volyn issue , ukraine will not join the european union, that is what this means, that is, we have to apologize to them, and we have already apologized many times, and they stood on their knees in front of these monuments of victims, of these historical events, ah... they shouldn't ask questions before us, well, this questioning is historical, it will be long, it's just, well, you know, it's just evidence, in my opinion, that in the polish political system, the problems of the past, they really they are sitting, but i would like to ask a simple question, why did it happen? the volyn tragedy, and on which territory is the main thing, and why ukraine should apologize, well, it's so simple, you have to look. er, you know, the historical duration of all these processes that took place on ukrainian lands, why they

took place, to mention the role of russia, which actually formed the russian world in volyn at the beginning of the 20th century, and why, say, the same volyn peasants met with bread, salt, bolsheviks and the like, and how they prepared them for the fact that the poles are enemies and the like, there are a lot of problems, but i think that during the time of kuchma and yushchenko, by the way, we found ways to communicate normally, and our presidents went there, as you say, stood on their knees, i saw it with my own eyes, everyone came here, they did the same thing , and we gave society completely different signals that there were tragedies, because of this no one can now say that they did not happen, we define, we apologize and ask for forgiveness. this formula, which is really relevant today, although it was born

many, many years ago, another there is no option, if we hear statements like this, then it will mean that we will just go to the wall again and again, behind which, well, just a dead end, because no one will ever prove that he was not the first, well, yes, well, we also have neighbors, poles, hungarians, and everyone will be there. to say that you are not, you cannot go to the european union, you should apologize, you should give the hungarian language there more in transcarpathia, well, that is , there will always be claims from other neighbors to us, that is, that is what we should do here ... seems to me a clear position, well, now it's good, in order to start negotiations, it was necessary to make some verbal concessions to the hungarians, but i don't think that this is the moment that should determine the basis of our bilateral relations. thank you, mr. volodymyr, for the conversation, friends, this was volodymyr ogryzko, diplomat, politician, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2007-9,

i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct a survey, today we ask you about this, do you think you are third world. war is inevitable, so what are our preliminary poll results, because they are intermediate, 57% yes, 41%, or 43%, no. national tv on megogo - too many channels, well, too many channels, as well as movies, cartoons, series and favorite shows. turn on mego on different devices, without wires. and antennas and all this from uah 49 per month, there are discounts that represent the only discounts on tolocsen strong 10% in pharmacies plantain will save you more. if the throat is not ok, make a snicker, make it ok. choose the taste without the pain of cutting. eucalus sweet lord. vasyl winter's big broadcast. my

name is vasyl. this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime. two o'clock your time my colleagues and i will talk about the most important thing, for two hours, to learn about the war, about the military, front, and component. serhiy zgurets and what the world lives on. yuri fizer is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. good evening two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchuvka is next to me. and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation.

exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air espresso tv channels. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia is already on the verge of exhausting its resources, topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they able to use, let's say, the resources there. this is vitaliy portnikov of the lukashenka army allied with them and the guests of the project read everything, accept my song, thank you, it was difficult, but i was just interested, but this is absolutely not ate, help understand the present and predict the future, offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. politclub every sunday at

20:00 at espresso. events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, you need to understand it. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 13:10 with a repeat at 22:00. studio zahid with anton borkovsky on espresso. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin. sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresin had done so, he would have gone to prison. a special look at the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish is rotting from the head? no, not off the top of my head. but beyond it. and then who is china? my heart

hurts. all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny. saturday 17:10, sunday 18:5. greetings friends, on the air of the espresso tv channel, the second part of the program is the verdict, and traditionally, as it happens every friday, we have a journalism club, and today we will talk about the following in our journalism club. up to 15 years of imprisonment, allegedly. iryna farion in lviv has announced suspicion and chooses a precautionary measure. what is known about the possible motives of the crime? the world is on the threshold of the third. of the world, ukrainian generals zaluzhny and syrsky interpret putin's flawed logic for the west. how to prevent global conflict? peace initiatives

of zelensky, johnson and trump. the world is looking a way to appease putin. which of the proposed recipes can be more effective. we will talk about this and other things in the next 45 minutes. talk on our air, but before starting our conversation, i suggest you join our poll, dear friends, today we ask you about this, do you think the third world war is inevitable, yes, no, everything is simple on youtube, or yes , or not, if you have your own opinion, separate, please leave it under this video in the comments, if you watch us in telecast, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381 if: you think a third world war is inevitable, and if you don't think so, 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of

the program, we will sum up the results of this vote, i want to introduce today's guests of our studio, this is yanina sokolova, journalist, tv presenter, public figure, blogger, yanina, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, congratulations, congratulations sergey, congratulations andrii, greetings to the audience. and andriy yanitsky journalist, you have already introduced andriy, andriy yanitsky, today we will talk about many topics, we will discuss many stories with you, well, as is traditionally the case in the journalism club, but let's start with this survey, because we ask our tv viewers and viewers, traditionally we in in the blitz format, we ask our guests what they think about it, do you think the third world war is inevitable, please yanina, the third. the world war is already going on in such a muted version, in which, it seems to me, the western world is not yet finished

understands that it depends on them, including its successful completion as winners, and not only on ukraine, which somewhere is fighting alone, and not on israel, and on many other countries that are currently at the stage of war with the.. . a world with money, technology, technology and the absence of democracy, the value of human life. many say that now the war is existential, and it is, and valery zaluzhnyi, what a speech, for the first time, probably such a big speech, now we will talk about it, you will now talk about all the topics in blitz, so we will return to the old, we are already in it, we have already been in it. ok, let's move on to zaluzhnyi and his quotes, but we are in it, and how effectively it may or may not develop into the

direct participation of the countries that are currently in a conditional or direct coalition with us, we would also like to talk about such today and about them, zaluzhny hinted at them, well , the scale of this war will depend on that, i believe that it is already in progress. well, i will tell our viewers that yanina sokolova is very serious youtube channel, 1,120,000 subscribers, if you watch youtube channels, be sure to subscribe to yanina sokolova's youtube channel, andriy does not yet have such a powerful youtube channel, let's hope that whatever happens, yes, a small one, will be like this but powerful. andrii, what do you think about the fact that... what does the hard worker say that the third world war is inevitable, i absolutely agree with ms. yanina, the third world war is already underway, everything that is happening not only in

ukraine, in syria , in israel, in other hot spots of the planet, it's all interconnected processes, and by and large it is a struggle between democratic regimes and autocratic regimes that have come together, informally so far, but we see, for example, how iran is helping russia, how china... secretly helping russia, how north korea is helping russia, and coalitions are already forming , and a pro-democracy coalition is forming around ukraine, there are many countries that have not yet decided, are wavering, trying to be neutral, but sooner or later they will have to decide and take someone's side, i hope that democracy will win, democracy has to win, it is absolutely obvious, yanina has already mentioned the first speech in the status of extraordinary... ambassador plenipotentiary to great britain, the former head of the armed forces of ukraine, general zaluzhnyi, speaking in the pre-auditorium of a distinguished audience. said that russia's attack on

ukraine could be a prelude to the involvement of the world in the third world war, and society should be prepared for it, what the general said: first of all, it is necessary to avoid soldiers, but if the war does come, it is necessary to be ready for it, society must agree to temporarily give up a whole series of freedoms, liberties, for the sake of surviving the modern war, unfortunately, total, they require the efforts not only of the army, but also of society in general, well, obviously... yanina, zaluzhnyi spoke not only about ukrainian society, and since he spoke before a foreign audience, it was obviously addressed, including to a western audience, that until you realize that the war is near and it may already be in your country, and until you react adequately, there is still danger the outbreak of the third world war, although i am with i completely agree with you that the third world

war is already underway and ahead. where we were the former minister of foreign affairs of ukraine volodymyr orysko on the air, he said that in general this war was started by putin back in 2007, from the munich conference, although we can say that this war began with putin's coming to power in 2000, that you will say about how diligent, how convincing he is to a british audience, to a foreign audience, that is, a person with a lot of ... combat experience, there is probably no extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador from with such combat experience, and a person who just almost left the front, moved to the status of a diplomat and now tells everyone about the dangers of war to the world? many call britain an empire only because they dislike the russians as much as the russians dislike them. and a lot of

russian propaganda tells about the fact that britain's love for ukraine, only the desire of every empire to have power over someone smaller, however, when i was in great britain, it was a month ago, i spoke with people who represent ukraine there in certain organizations, and human rights activists, and political analysts, i heard only one thing: great britain and... respect for the brave is caused by the strength that the ukrainian army and ukrainian society showed in relation to such, in their opinion, the strongest military aggressor in the world , which is the russian federation. the fact that we were able to stop the aggressor, and the fact that i am talking to you now, and kyiv, many regions are not occupied and de-occupied, despite the fact that, believe me, no one

is in the west. did not expect that this would happen, despite the sympathy, it is for them the great heroism of the ukrainian army, and zaluzhny, in their opinion, is the chieftain of this whole process, and they treat him that way, you must understand that when the time magazine came out with zaluzhny on the cover, i saw my british friends buying this publication, read his columns later, in zaikonomist in many other publications, they understand... that this is such a new force, a new general spirit and format that europe needs, and it needs from the west, and nato needs. therefore, for a long time there were rumors that zulazhny could lead some, some point here from nato, training of our soldiers within the framework of nato, well, in any formations in which it is possible, they named zaluzhny as the leader, why? because in the whole world, which ... lives on issues of

defense capability, zaluzhny is the leader of a new progressive army that is able to stand up to an enemy like russia, so what zaluzhny said was under a lot of attention in the uk, and i saw the posts the british themselves on twitter and facebook, where they talked about the fact that the western world should really get out of its way. port shell and go to the issue of defense capability on to such a bridgehead of the war, which may start very soon, because the conclusions have not been drawn, and it is important that luzhneh spoke at the united institute of defense studies, this is the london royal united institute, and those statements about the third world war that he made , which then spread quite a bit, by the way serhii...