because none of the citizens in armenia wanted the azerbaijani army to enter yerevan, we have a slightly different situation, as you understand, it could have been in the first months of the war, and now i'm just saying that this is exactly what they wanted to do situation, to mass actions against the government that betrayed ukraine, that is why they do not want negotiations, but want to create such a scenario that would facilitate their further actions. it's one moment, the second moment, all these plans, whether it's johnson or pompeo, it's an attempt to draw attention to himself, donald trump, because each is now trying to find his place next to him, hoping that he can become the president of the united states, which is absolutely not decided, it will be decided by the american people, we understand that with the appearance of kamela hardys in the campaign, it is not so easy for trump now, how could it be

however, even as it might have seemed before, when donald trump was in the pre-election struggle with joseph biden, he might have thought that the position of president was in his pocket, now even he does not think so, well, there are some religious people trumpists who are sure that he will win, but the chances were 50/50, and they are. next point, no china, no india can be any real mediators between ukraine and russia for one simple reason. they are interested in economic relations with the russian federation, it would be of no use to them to end this war if they refused to trade oil with russia and, in the case of china, not to send components for these russian military industrial plants, despite the fact that the president of ukraine says that the chinese head sidzinpinemu promised that china will not supply russia with weapons, he repeated this during the negotiations with dmitry kolebo ivani, we understand that... in addition to weapons, there is also

equipment for weapons, and this is what china supplies, and this is what causes such a harsh reaction of nato. and i absolutely did not understand why we behaved differently. we are a country on the territory of which these weapons kill our citizens, trying to pretend that the chinese are of no use here. mr. vitaly, why did kuleba go to china then, he went, he told about the fact that such people were very successful negotiations, that china respects two ukrainian reasons, it is... the chinese reason, the chinese reason, china needs to legitimize itself as a neutral intermediary, nato says that china is helping russia, makes tough statements, the united states will introduce sanctions against chinese companies, and we there is nothing to do here, we generally communicate with putin, and we communicate with kuleba, and we are neutral, and you are warmongers who still want to limit our economic growth under the guise of bastards, and of course then we need, to... tell him to all the western politicians,

you see, he came, and you say that we are behind russia, and we are talking to ukrainian ministers, and you don't do that, you don't talk to russian, because you want the war continued, and we want the war to end. okay, now our wishes, well, first of all, we can't refuse china's offer if they invite us, because if we say, come, let's talk about peace, and we say no, then we look like a country that does not want peace, although again. you can look at it differently, you can say, listen, as long as you have a strategic partnership with russia, as long as you supply it with components, we will not have a foot in china, well, the chinese are breaking diplomatic relations with those countries that establish diplomatic relations with each other, that was correct ukraine's position, it's a matter of choice, i would do that, but the ukrainian leadership is not doing that, now again, why, because we still have some strange hope that china can... and india can influence russia, well

that is, in general, for the global south, so the authorities of ukraine have hopes, and we see that the authorities talk a lot, in principle, about the countries of the global south and try, relatively speaking, to constantly establish some kind of relations with them, of course, we do everything possible to countries of the global south to fix them and we always turn a blind eye to their contacts with russia, but in the case of israel the situation is different, we always tell them that what you see there... you continue to have contacts with moscow, although there are already such meetings with prime ministers taniakha and putin, like all dzyampinas and umidos, do not have an agreement with putin, it is true recently, at least, but president zelenskyi did not go to israel because he understands that it can anger the global south, i don't know, by the way , what will he do if trump becomes president, because for trump this, and this is ignoring israel, this will be automatic proof of disloyalty, but you already know that, you will have to choose then either trump or the global south, it will already be in the future , but it doesn't matter. has

meaning that it seems to me that our perception of diplomacy is the perception of not real chances, the perception of the picture. there it is, the question is quite simple: the survival of ukraine. in a long-term war with the russian federation, what is needed for this? for this, we need to have money and weapons, because without money and without weapons, russia will simply turn us into its own province in a few months. what is needed, what else is needed so that russia does not have money and weapons? who helps russia to be with money and weapons, china, india, other countries of the global south. thanks to the support of these countries, russian. was able to level the western sanctions and now may not pay attention to the point of view of the united states and the countries of the european union. with whom do we want to build relations now, especially with the very countries whose policies help russia to continue the war. to what extent we can influence their economic interests, no way,

no way. moreover, we ourselves want to sell grain to them so that everything is stable for them. and when we cannot sell them grain. which they need to develop their economy so that they could buy oil and gas from russia, we ourselves are the first to complain, so what do we want, if after all we return to the issues of these visits, and kuleba, and another visit follows from this, mr. modi should come to ukraine, information about this appeared last night, and this morning it was confirmed. a whole series of sources, actually indian ones, why is this to mr. modi, why is this to ukraine, and what can we take from this positive or negative for ourselves, is it true, or can it be

compared with the same visit of kuleba to to china, that it will essentially be a fruitless, fruitless meeting, well, at a higher level, and what do you want to expect? it is strange that the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine has not been there yet, but you can try to have him go there to hanoi, well , that is, vietnam has a strategic partnership with the united states, very good relations with the people's republic of china despite all the economic conflicts, and putin bamboo diplomacy goes there, here we host biden, here we host putin, bamboo is known to be flexible, this is bamboo diplomacy. in india's strategic partnership with the united states, we go to moscow, we make our first visit, as soon as we are reassigned as prime minister, we immediately go to moscow, say that putin is our best friend, and go to ukraine, show that we are interested in that

there would be no war. by the way, if you ask me if i think that the render mod sincerely wants there to be no war, i will tell you as a person on the render mod, we see it, sincerely believes. that war is not a method of solving problems, by the way, this can be distinguished from sidzenpin, uh, that he is not a communist, but such in terms of political views, a right-wing statesman, it is true, that means, from his views, issues can be resolved politically, he is the leader of electoral democracy, he is used to fighting for power politically, and not by using the army, and then, of course , he told putin in samarkand, but no one pulled his tongue. that war is not a method of solving the problem in the 21st century, not everyone will say that putin, the more a person is interested in good relations with russia, but that he really can, nothing like for him to influence putin, if, moreover, he is interested in putin not finally falling

into the arms of sitzenpin, for him russian-chinese cooperation is a much more serious challenge than russia's war with ukraine, because he believes that if it is ... cooperation will deepen, this is a danger for india, and he will do everything to avert this danger, then a rather serious question arises that why should he go to kyiv, well, this is part of his strategic partnership with the united states, if he is a strategic partner of the united states, shares the principles of american foreign policy, american foreign policy is connected with the need to end the war, it is in his interests, he will come, he will speak at... a joint press conference with volodymyr zelenskyi, by the way, despite the fact that that the president of ukraine spoke about him personally rather disapprovingly and said that he did not understand how prime minister modi could kiss putin when putin was shelling a children's hospital, and i don't understand either, but i don't

know if i would go i am visiting a person who would she said that about me, and the prime minister is an experienced politician, he is going, he made a mistake, well, they called our ambassador, he said something to him. hall, but after that he swallowed it, and this basically means that he believes that this visit to kyiv will have principles. character, by the way, and in the domestic political arena of india, because he will say: yes, we have very good relations with the russian federation, yes, i met with president putin and told him about him about the traditional relations between moscow and india, and these relationship begins still there since jowahar, but we are a humane country, we are a country that cannot but support women and children who die in war. our task is to come and support morally, maybe... economically, maybe we can somehow help economically with some humanitarian aid, but don't

forget that this is the prime minister of a country that buys weapons from the russian federation, whose army, first of all, has a huge the number of russian weapons, and the prime minister, when he was in moscow, negotiated with president putin to speed up the supply of weapons, and by the way, it would also be good for him to get all these weapons from him, because the weapons that putin will supply to india will not reach the russian-ukrainian ones. but i think that the chances of the indian prime minister are not so small, because we understand that now the priority for the russian leader is uninterrupted supply to his troops, and it is clear that for him the war against ukraine is a much more important priority than relations with any india so be it, can modi mediate between russia and india and ukraine cannot. i say again, in order to end the war, we do not need mediators, we need putin to want to end it, if putin does not want

to end it, if putin believes that time is his ally, then there is no politician in the world, which would force putin to take some step back, there are tools, if you don't buy oil and gas, then of course putin will end this war much earlier than he would like, but can you argue for renodzi? that he should not buy russian energy carriers, if president volodymyr zelensky had such an argument, then of course we could say then that the prime minister came here for a reason, but i do not have an answer to the question of who in the world has such an argument. well, a little break, we 'll be back in a few minutes, and then of course we'll talk about the united states of america, there's just... there's an incredible amount of news, there's a lot of political life there, and of course there's an election going on, probably

the most difficult election in a long time decades, a few minutes and we return, no switch from the espresso channel. the book women at war is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the publishing house. spirit and letter is a book based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores of ukraine. with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation. pain can become an obstacle. walk up the stairs, not with my knees. for pain in the knees, try the cream longitude long-acting cream relieves pain, reduces swelling

and improves joint mobility. with long-lasting cream. you can also walk. dolgit is the only yellow cream for joint pain. education is the future of every country. what is changing in ukrainian schools, what will the university of tomorrow look like. the country is immersed in the world of educational transformations. we ask experts, listen to teachers. parents and children. from nush to higher school, we explore the labyrinths of educational reforms. read to understand, understand to change. ask for the country at the points of sale press or subscribe online. fm: galicia. listen to yours. there

are discounts representing the only discounts on neprobam 10% in the pharmacies of plantain you and ochad . vasyl winter's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zema, this is a big broadcast on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of yours. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important thing, for two hours, to learn about the war, about the military, front-line, component, serhiy zurets, and how the world lives? yuri fizer is already in front of me, and it's time to talk about what is beyond the limits. yurii dobro evening took place in ukraine. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morshchevka is next to me, and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. the news is cultural. chekchenina's observer is ready to say good evening to them. hosts who have become like family to many. vitalka didenko is already next to me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend. and also distinguished guests of the studio.

mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us. mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. in the evening. saturday political club. we're back live. and now we are talking about the united states of america. it's been a little less than a week since the president, the current president of the united states of america, joe biden. withdrew from the presidential race, he declared that he was sacrificing personal ambitions for the sake of democracy, for the sake of uniting the american society, he also outlined certain priorities for his administration for the next five months, which he will lead, and he stated that among such priorities, of course,

putin's stop in ukraine will be included. for the first day. the candidate for the presidency and the current vice president of the united states of america, kamala harris collected almost a record amount of funds, at first it was more than 50 million dollars, later it was 81 million dollars, it is now a figure that is already far for 100 million dollars, and of course it is worth mentioning the rating. that we've seen over the last few days, they show that kamala harris is actually breathing down the neck of another contender for the presidency of the united states of america, trump, yes, and their ratings are almost even now at 50 to 50. in some age categories, kamala

harris even defeats the former president of the united states. so public, we see that the ratings after the withdrawal of joe biden from the election race to the democrats, in democrats are up overall, how do you see the overall fallout from joe biden 's withdrawal and...does kamala harris really have a significant chance of defeating donald trump as of now. well, i have already told you many times, andrei, and now i will repeat that i generally believe that this election is a referendum, a referendum, on whether donald trump, whom we all know very well, what kind of person he is and what kind of

politician he is, lead the united states of america. from the point of view of his supporters, this question does not even need an answer. ugh. from the point from the point of view of his opponents, this question does not even need to be answered, these people are divided in america 50 to 50, and i believe that joseph biden also had the opportunity to win the election of the president of the united states, but it would be solely a referendum on donald trump, when the democrats nominated kamal harris, they turned the referendum into an election, because now there may still be some number of people who will vote not so much against donald trump as for kamela harris, just imagine. people who will vote for joseph biden out of conviction precisely because of biden, after this debate it was difficult, of course, because each person had to ask himself the question, well, biden, he is in such bad physical shape, he is already 81 years old, it is obvious that he has given up physically, but well , but not trump to be

the president of the united states, now those considerations may look different, i want the president of the united ... she will be the first woman, she will be the first african-american president and the first indian-american president, it's just a set of completely new qualities, she's young man, not this one grandpa, who claims to return to the white house, why is he not german at all, he was already president, he can no longer say 10 words normally, shut up, go play golf, and by the way, you can quote donald trump himself, what does he say about people of... the same age as him, because they are the same age as joseph biden, and this is the oldest, let me remind you, donald trump is the oldest candidate for the position of president of the united states, and it is not enough that this person is not at such an advanced age could p' say something in english language so that someone would understand what he meant, so now she still forgets those five words, well, of course, in this situation it

looks different, but that does not mean that donald trump cannot win the election, because again you and i know what the election of the president of the united states of america is like, it is a few states that determine the political map of the country and the number of elections, voters in the electoral college, and from the way... how kamela harris and donald trump play out the key states, it will be a lot to depend on. i think i am you said last time that for many states strategically important for the democrats, joseph biden was what is called his guy, for the so-called rusty chain, he was his guy, but i do not rule out that kamela harris can play with other states, her game those states in which biden passed. once lost and trump won them, uh, joseph biden won the states he lost that hillary clinton lost, but lost certain

states that she won, if kamel harris manages to take those states back and win one or two of those states biden, so-called, she will defeat donald trump, this is arithmetic, but it is necessary to conduct a flawless election campaign. in these states, you need to become a real icon not only for those who believe that the election of donald trump as the president of the united states will be a disaster on a national and global scale, and this may be true, but also for those who do not see anything special in donald trump , but the republicans see him as just another candidate and think first of all about what kind of president he wanted would see in the white house from the point of view of their own economic interests, and this is not an easy story, not easy. but if we're talking about the choice of vice-presidential candidates, yes, trump

is now extremely criticized for choosing divens, and even from the point of view of the republicans, some of them are saying that this choice was a bad one, that that divisiveness actually scares off some voters, and it's not just democrats or independent voters who are saying that. this is what the republicans say, that is, that is, that is, this candidate for vice president, he can essentially chop election campaign to trump himself, but let's go back to kamala harris, she is currently choosing from seven candidates, but i have a list in front of me, and there are various candidates, it is the former us attorney general eric golder, it is there and and... governors it is valid and in fact it can be one of the senators or one of the congressmen, that

is, there really is, relatively speaking, a large number of people who can potentially be of high quality for the democratic party, and who can represent kamala harris with quality, but if we're talking about... this choice the extent to which a potential vice president can play a role in leading either kamala harris or donald trump to victory. well, look why some republicans don't like jades because they think he's not expanding donald trump's base, that donald trump needs to work with those undecided voters. because again , he does not need to work with those voters who have made up their minds, they will vote for donald trump under any conditions, and even if he chooses a horse like an emperor as his vice president

roman and will say that this is the person he will introduce into the senate, the vice president is already presiding over the senate, then it is absolutely obvious that they will vote for trump anyway and will calmly look at trump's horse, who will preside over the senate, but there are people , who are undecided, and the figure of the vice president should... say that trump, relatively speaking, can offer them a certain kind of normality in politics, and that is why, by the way, the figure of mike was so important to many voters in 2016 pence. mike pence is a typical republican politician, an ultraconservative, but he is a politician, he is a representative of the political establishment. the very presence of mike pence in the white house told these people that nothing extraordinary was going to happen, that this person, he is a businessman, he is a tv presenter, i have a relationship with trump. she has never been involved in politics, but she is inclined to cooperate with politicians. mike pence objectively expanded trump's electoral base, and jd vance will not expand anything.

but trump is the kind of person who... does what he likes, what corresponds to some politico-technological considerations, and to thing, no one said it's wrong, because quite often it's when you make some unexpected move that you beat the calculators, on the other hand, i don't think you and i can know who kamela harris is going to choose as her running mate, because by and large she also needs a person who... the electoral base, and they're going to be democrats now sitting and counting, which person, say, might be important in those states where kamela harris isn't enjoys such, let's say, obvious popularity, as enjoyed, let's say, joseph biden, conventionally speaking, biden and haris were adding something to each other, now biden is not on the ticket, conventionally speaking, kamel

and haris. it takes someone like biden and they will watch it. at the same time, kamela harris is not such an authoritarian person as trump. and she didn't privatize the democratic party like the trump-republican party. one way or another, she will pay attention to the point of view of the democratic establishment. who would she like to see as vice president of the united states. who will be more successful a candidate who will demonstrate that... democrats listen to different views, to different segments of the population, from where this person should come from a moderate democratic circle, or vice versa with a more radical one, in order to, let's say, attract some more part of the voters, that is, they are now will count it, i think that in a few weeks we will understand it, if we analyze the position of kamala harris regarding

ukraine. this is also one of the subjects of discussion, many say that kamala harris does not have any position there, she did not talk much about ukraine, yes, but it is clear that it was and is a part of joe biden's administration, and it is clear that its position is most likely the same as the position of the white house as of now, that is, support for ukraine in the form in which it is. .. now, in which she was, and it is likely that it will be so, but still, can it change, well, it is clear that it is possible for the better, perhaps in the direction of increasing assistance to our country, the position of kamala harris, and again , whether she will focus

on ukraine during the election campaign. on the victory over russia, on victories over putin, and everything related to this important international track? ukraine is not part of the american election campaign. of course, kamela harris can talk about it, as well as trump, but in passing. is the middle east part of the american election campaign? benjamin netanyahu's visit to washington was usually perceived as a domestic political event. we will certainly also talk about this. and ukraine, but ukraine is not like that. affects this situation, regarding the views of kamela harris on ukraine, you understand, in the vice president of the united states has a specific role, he is responsible for the directions that the president assigns him, but the vice president of the united states, joseph biden, was responsible for ukraine, so we knew very well what his position is on the ukrainian issue, because he generally dealt with it , and he came to kyiv as the vice president of the united states, and

he spoke in the verkhovna rada from... ukraine as the vice president of the united states, remember? so, of course, when this person became president of the united states, she did not to her vice president to entrust ukraine, because she believed that this was a direction she herself knew. well, in such a situation, as we understand it, kamela harris will have to one way or another, if she becomes the president of the united states, uh, to form her position in relation to ukraine with the help of this team that she will select. and this will also be related to who will be part of this team, who will be the assistant to the president for national security issues, who will be the secretary of state, you understand that this whole team, they are leaving the white house, but more, she would have kept him anyway, because a second-term president usually also changes teams, well, some would stay, some would leave, but you know, i don't see any president of the united states at all that kamela harris, what

donald trump, no.