and he spoke in the verkhovna rada of ukraine as the vice president of the united states, remember? well, that's why, of course, when this person became the president of the united states, she did not entrust ukraine to her vice president, because she believed that this was a direction that she herself knew. well, in such a situation, as we understand it, kamela harris will have to one way or another, if she becomes the president of the united states, to form her position in relation to ukraine. with the help of this team, which she will select, and this will also be connected with the fact that who will be part of this team, who will be the assistant to the president for national security, who will be the secretary of state, you understand that this whole team, they are leaving the white house, moreover, they would leave it in any case, because the president the second term, as a rule, also changes the team, well , someone would stay, someone would leave, but you know, i don't see in any president of the united states that there is a camel at all.

hardys that donald trump no important, real opportunities to maneuver from the point of view russian-ukrainian war. any president of the united states will proceed from the fact that he should help ukraine in russia's opera, and that this help should exclude the possibility of a direct conflict between the russian federation and the united states of america. can donald trump cross those red lines? to a certain extent yes, and then the third world war will begin. can kamela harris cross those three red lines? more likely no than yes. so, in principle, i think that the question of what the situation will look like will be decided in general by the following condensation. four years, given the whole meaning of this war and this whole style of war, is very little for us to count on a solution at all after november 2000. the 24th year,

november 2028, is a more likely date for us to sit down here and talk, how can the war end, but now only, i would say, considering that this is a long-term war, this is only the first years, we say all the time, this is a syrian-type war, the syrian one was a low-intensity conflict, as long as it lasted, eight years, eight years, now the conflict high. how long can a high-intensity conflict take place, well, up to 6-7 years calmly, taking into account the capabilities of russia, taking into account the capabilities of the west to help us, then a low-intensity conflict will begin, it has already passed, we have already passed the station where it was possible to somehow stop it, we just need to get to that be realistic, to the extent that ukraine and russia have sufficient economic, social, demographic and political potential, no united states will be able to influence this, but the united states does not...

putin, because again, we talked about it for a long time, because putin feeds off china, india, and not from the united states and the european union, putin has no opportunity to bring ukraine to his knees, because we are being helped, and as long as they are helping us , there's no chance we 're going to agree to his terms, so what the president of the united states can do, well, well, trump will try, if he becomes president, to try some kind of negotiation process. to organize or from the point of view of those advisers who say it is necessary to press on ukraine, or from the point of view of pompeo, who says that it is necessary to put pressure on russia, but also to put pressure there and there are not many opportunities, well, he gathered trump, putin and zelensky in camp david, like begin and sadat, well, i apologize, begin had to give up the egyptian territory for the sake of peace, and we have to give up our own for the sake of peace, as i understand it, imagine that.

the peace summit between israel and egypt, when anwar saddat says: "menachim obyeginu, mr. prime minister, but here you are occupying the sinai peninsula, and maybe aswan occupy with luxor, and there will be peace between us right away." great idea, mr. president, come on, withdraw your troops. well, that's what it looks like, isn't it? and the meaning of the peace between egypt and israel was that minahenbehen. said to anwar sadat, we control your vast territory, but we are not interested in controlling your territory, in peace with egypt, and if you agree to recognize our right to exist, if you guarantee us peace with guarantees of security for us and for you from the united states, we will withdraw the troops from of your territory, this is the nobel peace prize, putin comes to the white house, sees zelensky and says: oh, you know, we are worried about the security guarantee. we do not

feel safe, you know, we are withdrawing russian troops from donetsk, luhansk, kherson, zaporizhzhia regions and crimea, we agree to that. so that there are american peacekeepers or western peacekeepers on your territory, we for our part demand such and such security guarantees from the united states there, agreements on nuclear disarmament there and so on, and there will be eternal peace between russia and ukraine, but putin is not proposing that, he is proposing completely opposite things, we occupied part of your territory, you give us the opportunity to occupy more parts , get out of these four regions where you are, disarm. declare neutrality, no security guarantees for you, and there will be peace, of course, it’s like in soviet comedies, i’ll kill you quietly, russian peace, russian peace, yes, oh, well, which donald trump will agree to such conditions,

such donald trump , not yet nations, not yet born, because what is our role in this, your role is grandfather to play golf, in maralaga, what have you come up with here? vorochit, go to your dacha, well, this is how it looks, so of course, there will be no peace, there are no opportunities to end the russian-ukrainian war, there is no political solution, that is, there is one, i have repeatedly spoken about it so that no one would say , which i didn't say about it, i am making it clear: the war between russia and ukraine can end if the countries that are members of the north atlantic alliance invite ukraine to nato and provide guarantees security, or for those territories that are located today. under the control of the legitimate ukrainian authorities, or in the extreme case for those territories not claimed by the russian federation, i.e. it claims donetsk, luhansk, kherson, zaporizhzhia regions and crimea, these territories are not covered by the security guarantee, all other territories are covered , here are two options, either to a controlled territory, or to a territory

that does not cause them to fear a direct conflict with russia. surprise if they choose one of these two options, the war will end in 48. hours or be localized only in these territories, where there will be no guarantee of security, there will be no shelling, there will be no destruction of infrastructure, nothing will happen, and most likely there will be nothing, so that putin will not understand why he needs all this, it is a bridgehead, and if the bridgehead has nowhere to move, then there is no point in getting it, so i think that the territorial integrity of ukraine will be restored in a couple of years, if this no decision will be made, but the war will continue as much as i said, as much as we have enough strength, as much as the russians have. forces, which means another 5-6 years of high-intensity war, then 8-10 years, years of low intensity, well, well, well, unfortunately, well, well, there are no miracles, you understand, there are no miracles in politics, a miracle could happen if the war ended in 3-4 months, and the russians would be so

scared that they would be ready for the end of the war, for the conclusion of peace, of course, not like in istanbul, disarm, de-nazify, shoot yourself give us the condition to occupy you, and we really want a real ceasefire, but the miracle did not happen, we did not scare them much then, and putin simply reformatted this war from blitzkrieg to a multi-year war of extermination, we live in it and will live in it, you have to survive in this war, i have already said that it is now important that the state itself does not collapse, such a danger exists, it will increase with each new month and year of the war, and if ukrainian society behaves conscientiously, we will be in 2027, 2028 year, let's say that this one danger, it has not turned out to be as serious as it seemed, but that does not mean that we will not talk to you in 2027, 2028 in the year between major air alarms, it will be, it will be, it will not be otherwise, because there are no platforms, well, that's all, well, you have to

adjust to it and just build your life in an endless war, well, we can't invent it, let's say, to please ours. of the audience, what do you know, everything will go smoothly, for two or three weeks, and i went to america, it is, so to speak, to grow flowers, as one former office adviser there president of ukraine, i don't have the ability to lie, otherwise i would probably already be in a very high position, well, we have many experts, people with abilities, abilities that, unfortunately, we were told about... and at the same time, i still i would still like to say that i can allow a cease-fire at any time, if desired, the russians can simply think that they, that they cannot hold out, they will, that they need to leave temporarily and just to maintain the cease-fire without

conditions, uh, it can also be a transition to, conditionally speaking, the hybrid war that we had there from the 15th to the 22nd, it can happen, just tre. always remember when it happens that doesn't mean the war is over it can break out any second any second then i'll tell you even more the russians may need a cease fire because they themselves . will be interested in restarting the ukrainian government, they will believe that if they cease fire, then the ukrainian government will not be able to hold elections, and they will have a chance, relatively speaking, to fight for such a ukrainian government, which is already capitulating against the background of public disappointment, if they see a great public disappointment, they themselves will seek a ceasefire for the sake of a note of the political process, and the government will be reformatted, and then when on... you are the ukrainian president, we'll say no, i won't do it , then they will resume combat, then

they will resume combat, absolutely right, well , that’s the formula, many different options, well , we live with you in such an interesting time, unfortunately, well, for journalists, maybe not unfortunately, but for us, those , who is watching us, unfortunately i would not wish anyone to live in such times, unless he is a journalist, let's say. another topic of netanyahu in the united states of america, finally, yes, we see that the prime minister of israel spoke in the congress of the united states of america, there he stated that iran is the main threat to the world, and we need to unite efforts to stop him, yes, also, in general, in fact, we'. saw that kamala harris missed this performance, well, of course, she has an ongoing election

campaign, and in principle she should not have been there to be, if we talk about it, yes, but then she met, so the next thing is what i wanted to say, and she said that she would not be silent, and about the gas situation, but she understood that the united states of america would also support and... these statements were also made, and of course, the prime minister of israel met with donald trump, they held, so to speak, a conversation, held a meeting, and what was agreed upon, we will also talk about now, this one the arrival, it is carried out against the background of the election campaign, the republicans are trying to use it in order to remind that... that they are true friends of israel. in fact, why did benjamin netanyahu come now, why

didn't he, why didn't he come for two months, three months, he was invited by the speaker of the house of representatives, mike johnson. that is, before that we saw a situation that, after all, we did not really want to see. the republicans also wanted to see him, but i think that they wanted to invite him precisely at such a moment of the beginning of the election campaign. it's important to mike johnson, it's important to donald trump. for benjamin netanyaho, this is also important. because he was not invited to the white house, he has a difficult relationship actually with joseph biden, and of course he was always interested in such trips. in addition, one more thing must be understood: benjamin netanyahu, the prime minister of a warring country. it is also not so easy to leave a warring country for a few days in the midst of events. this is a question for the prime minister, where did you go? and this... the prime minister of israel, i don't know how to explain it to you, he doesn't fly on saturdays, so he wanted to return to

thursday, uh, he went on tuesday, uh , so then, so he had a meeting with biden, a meeting with kamela harris, separate, he had to meet with trump, but if you meet with trump on thursday, you can't fly on friday, so he met with trump on friday, i think. in the morning, and then shabbat begins , and you can fly out only on saturday evening, so how many days are you leaving israel, five, well, that's in total, if you also need to travel here, that's ho-ho, how many three, a day need to fly, well, it won't be there at 15:00-16, so there is still such a problem, you understand, that is, the prime minister of israel is interested in flying in on monday and leaving on thursday, it's difficult. to put all this together when you have such a large number of interlocutors, and if you

sit there, then they start saying, let's go to the united states, this is happening here, that is, it means that there needs to be a moment of at least some respite on the front line, so that he listens, in matters to me are important in the united states, it's important too, it's part of our war, and it's also time, then it's very important with from a domestic political point of view, minneminiho's rating increased in... before all other competitors for the position of the country's prime minister, although there was a moment, although before that it fell, but again, i don't know, did you see netanyahu's speech. in the congress, well, itanyaho is a close speaker, i can't call myself his political supporter, but if you watch this speech simply, let's say as a political observer, or as a jew, if you want, i watched as a jew with a great sense of pride , as i watched zelenskyi's speech, which i watched, of course, as a ukrainian

citizen, that is, it's just a brilliant, brilliant understanding. both american and israeli, and people who before that wrote congressmen that benjamin is the worst leader of israel in history, they stood up and gave him a standing ovation because he addressed the military in the gallery, because he talked about hostages, because he said "we're protecting you" and it's all exactly clear, content in brilliant english with an american accent, with an accurate understanding of how to pronounce it all with an american accent, it's something that enough for many world politicians who come to america, but they have never lived in america the way binyamin netanyahu lived, he just has experience

of american life, relatively speaking, he is almost an american, and it is also felt when he is with them ... speaks, well, and such, i would say, a willingness to accept a challenge, yes, when he calls the protesters useful idiots who do not even think that they can be spoken to in such a language, that is, of course, this is all a very strong speech, but we we understand that for the democrats this is a certain problem, because they are trying to keep the audience, let's say so, anti-israel, well, it's not a coincidence... this pelosi was not at this speech, she just didn't come, the former speaker of the house of representatives, it's not a coincidence that kamala harris was not presiding over this speech, it's also an absolutely obvious thing, well, it's a problem for the democrats, by the way, because i wouldn't say that 100% of their voters are against

israel, we have to understand that there are combinations, of course, but they have to be . can compose for that, they, well, they and compose, kamela harris did not preside over the senate, but met with netanyahu, uh, joseph biden there condemns certain actions of the israeli government, but supports israel, they compose it, they do not have such a clear position that trump takes. and by the way, before trump, if we go back, netanyahu met with trump. it is clear that trump also needed this meeting, what they talked about and what could be the pros and cons for both of them, they first reconciled, i don’t know how much trump needed it, i think that netanyahu it needed more, well, it's logical, but trump took a lot of offense to netanyahu, and it's also a very strange offense, he took offense to

netanyahu because netanyahu congratulated biden on being elected president of the united states, uh, although i remember that that same day... netanyahu wrote a big tweet thanking donald trump and there was a lot to be thankful for listen donald trump hands down israel. i have no doubts here. but how do you imagine the prime minister of israel who does not welcome the president-elect of the united states? no way, well, there are such politicians. viktor orban did not welcome. it seems to me that andrzej dude somehow simply congratulated joseph biden on taking office, but not on winning the election. but they are not at war with anyone. they can afford such luxury. and this is a warring country one way or another, well, but he was still offended like a child, ugh, and he had nothing to do with him for four years, criticized him publicly all the time, even met sara netanyahu here, kissed there, you saw, the wife of the prime minister of israel, well , that is, they somehow reconciled, but here it arises

another question is what trump can really do for netanyahu, but trump has done a lot for israel. at a time when israel was pursuing a policy that seemed logical to many at the time, to make peace with the arab countries for the sake of israel's security, and that was netanyahu's course, he believed that this was a justified course and, by and large, joseph biden was also following that course when he tried agree on diplomatic relations between saudi arabia and israel, but here the question arises, what can trump do when it comes to political there is no solution, well, there is none, but donald trump showed that mahmud dabas, the head of the palestinian authority , also wrote him a letter, which means an appeal to help. peace, but mahmoud abbas doesn't own the sentiments of the palestinian street, and binen netanyahu doesn't, and donald trump doesn't, and this palestinian street, i'm sorry, supports

whom? hamas, islamic jihad, radical organizations, and i don't think, to be honest, that what is happening now in the gas sector somehow contributes to a change in her mood, rather the opposite, well, by the way, hamas is exactly that when he did all this, he sought extreme radicalization of sentiments. so, does donald trump know how to solve this problem? he knows one thing that it must be resolved as soon as possible, because it contributes to the image of israel in the world. and the way that this perception has been happening in recent months is an unprecedented tragedy for israel, because this has never happened in the civilized world, i understand. that is , there would never be such a serious opposition, there never was, such a willingness to forget about october 7 last year. in connection with the events in the gas was never, and netanyahu heard this from trump who said you need to work on your

public affairs but it's not the public getting hit somewhere, the issue is that every israeli operation allows hamas to release tragic footage of local deaths that hamas uses as human shields for... its fighters and no one says: listen hamas uses civilians as human shields, everyone says israel is killing civilians, israel has more power, it has to give in, what if israel must concede, so what to do with hamas? if the israeli government has declared its goal to destroy hamas, then how can the war end, well, the war has been going on for almost 300 days. but today i saw that for the first time in a month there was a shelling of ashkelon from gaza, i'm not saying that there is a danger from hezbollah, that there is a danger from the yemeni tendrils, or that it can continue,

but we take one from gaza, if we were to say, you know, the war has been going on for 300 days, and hamas no longer even has the opportunity to fire rockets at israel, and if even after these 300 days has such opportunities, so what needs to be done to really eradicate this danger. like in some arabic parable, you know, to kill a snake, you have to burn the forest, but that's an ambitious wish, and by the way, i have to say that we're in a similar situation, that is, if we think that the end of the war and the victory of the war - this is the restoration of our territorial integrity, so how long is the war going on with us, 600 89th day, or more, i'm already confused in the numbers, of course. and there are ours and so 689 well, you see, i even remember this by heart israel means, i think that 290 fifth 295 we

just have to calculate arithmetically how many more days we will need in order to really restore this territorial integrity, maybe 100 or maybe 5200, it all doesn't matter, well, maybe especially considering the fact that it is raining. every day they capture even small ones, but these are new, new territories, well, we need to liberate them, so how much have we liberated in 689 days, well, a large territory, but there is some left, but it was in the 22nd year, it was for the 22nd year, of course, well, it always happens a turning point in the war for the benefit of the other, and it can happen in a few days, not in a few years, but it must last until this turning point, so we are in the same situation, the israelis, the ukrainians, 600... 295 day there is no understanding of political decision in nature. the year 689 is not a political solution in nature. well

, this is also trump, who says: i will decide for you here in one day, i am your grandfather here. days are already 295 and 689. when you become president, i don't even want to count how many there will be days well a lot there will be as many in israel as we have now, and i don't even want to count all these tragic days. the very fact that the media is currently counting down the days of war says a lot. well, so, with all due respect to trump's ability and to his sympathy for israel, he understands exactly what needs to be done, to end the war, to fix the image of israel, to destroy hamas. to establish some kind of regime that would allow the restoration of the gas sector, but he doesn't know how, uh, it's like the ukrainian war, he doesn't know how, he...

wants, but does not know how, well, it happens, even not only at this age, with people, at any age, you understand when you want and do not know how, well, i will tell you for sure that children from these are not born, well, this is such a problem, unfortunately, the 885th day, oh, the 885th, the 885th day, so much already... er, they are immersed in and in this daily process that these days, so to speak, already , you see, they go to thousands, to thousands, in fact, when the next us president takes office, there will be more and more, but think about it, when the war in the middle east began, no one it didn't even occur to me that it could be 295 days, well , it's the same with us, some in three weeks, and another topic,

sad, probably, the topic, today, when i read it, when you , mr. vitaly, we also talked before the start of the broadcast or during the break. the sejm of the republic of poland, with 422 deputies, condemned the activities of the ukrainian insurgent army and ukrainian national organizations. here i will now quote, volodymyr viatrovych, by the way, wrote about this today, he gave a quote from yesterday's resolution of the polish diet. diet the republic of poland condemns the spread of ideology and symbols related to the organization of ukrainian nationalists and the ukrainian insurgent army, the people and organizations that organized the genocide, i emphasize, must be covered with shame and

forever put. anti-model of actions, observing the growing popularity of references to the organization of ukrainian nationalists and the ukrainian insurgent army in ukraine, the sejm of the republic of poland recognizes that it is necessary to make efforts at the state level to eliminate this type of attitude, well, this is not just a statement, it is a resolution of the sejm of the republic of poland, i.e. the parliament, but this is what it conveys. another statement, now not a resolution, but i say it again, a statement of the ministry of foreign affairs, i think, to poland, that ukraine will not join the european union until it resolves the issue, the volyn issue, and, that is, here is such a statement, the second resolution , and it all happens over three or four days. well, in my opinion, this is

an absolutely unfriendly step that we received from a country that ukrainians consider friendly, yes, and from a country that is perfectly understands that we are now in a state of war, and unfortunately, the notes, even the honors, echo the position of the hungarians, so the hungarians have something similar... some ideological questions to us, but they rather concern national minorities, the hungarian national minority, here we see that poland, it would seem, well, most of the issues have already been resolved by historians, including joint conferences of various kinds, there were many joint meetings of ukraine and poland, official representatives, including, and this concerned the issue of the volyn issue, well

, as far as... the ukrainian insurgent army and the organization of ukrainian nationalists are concerned , there is generally a deadlock here, because these are people who fought for the right of their country, their people, to have our own country, including now . the russian empire, well, at that time the soviet union. mr. vitaly, what is this from poland, why are they doing it? moreover, whether it can become a certain cornerstone for us to block ukraine's accession to the european union, but less so, still i am interested in another question: why poland, and absolute, not even absolute, but practically 100%