that is, the system does not anticipate these problems. why? it's very simple: the general staff deals directly with the introduction of battles, instead of planning for tomorrow. the war should be conducted by the joint staff, not the general staff. this is the job of the joint staff, to be responsible for the battles directly, not the chief of the general staff, who runs around the brigades and helps them. to the general staff, which spends its time on today's concerns. so, there is a big problem area here. which you talked about at the beginning: all these systemic problems has to be decided if we want to move forward because we're not going to get all the equipment we need, so how far are we prepared to provide mortar ammunition, mortars, grenades, anti-tank ammunition and anti-aircraft ammunition. not all of these things will come from the international community, we have to find ways to produce them ourselves, that requires careful planning and... organization, and i

don't see that happening the way it should. we spend too much time thinking about the big f-16, naval projects drones, attacks on the kerch bridge, and not paying enough attention to ensuring that every one of our soldiers is alive and properly equipped to fight tomorrow. this war will not be lost at sea or in the rear. it will be lost on the front lines when soldiers die and resources run out. we simply cannot deal with the mass of soldiers coming at us from one place or another. we are doing well at the moment, but how long we can maintain this level of performance depends on whether they will soldiers on the front lines are properly trained, equipped and commanded by the best officers. i took a lot from what you said at the beginning, but we are in a transition period. i suppose you might be able to...

get my take on syrsky's recent article, but we still have a lot to do and most of these tasks require careful planning, and in some cases even legislative changes. planning is very important, but there is also such a concept as the general concept of war, and you are very good to mention colonel general syrskyi, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, and he very clearly warned about the plans of the enemy, about the plans of ukraine. he decided not to speak in the public space, so we understand that what you said should be done and even more, but there is also the question of what the enemy is preparing, and syrskyi gave very specific numbers, such as 690 thousand offensive contingents, i.e. 150 to 170 00 increase maybe at least yes from a public relations point of view it was probably an effective interview but i and...i'm

sure many others are concerned about the questions that concrete actions stand behind these words. it is clear that russia will continue to send people to fight as it has done in the past. there is no sign that they are running out of men, or that they have trouble recruiting new ones, since most of the new recruits die, russia doesn't need to pay them. society in russia has not yet fully realized the scale of what is happening. maybe every month. there may be some changes, but for now russia is focused on a long war. putin is negotiating with china, north korea and iran to ensure supply of weapons. they're trying to rebuild their own defense industry, but it's not as effective as it could be because they've already taken a lot of their best people and sent them to the front, effectively ruining some of their plans, but i don't think it's worth addressing a lot of attention i

think we should focus on what is happening on our side. if syrsky says he has a plan, the question is what kind of plan it is. if his plan is to continue fighting the way we have been fighting, a small soviet army against a large one the soviet army, we will not win, because we cannot cope with the enemy's numerical advantage. the number of machines and people will always be on their side, and this requires change. did not approach warfare. if we plan to change tactics and strategic approach today or tomorrow, we must teach people to fight differently today. this means that our best officers must be trained in a new way of waging war, the best, and we need to find more officers who can implement these new approaches. because to fight in the same way, i would call it the way of sirsky, simple. pushing

people forward and telling them to stay there and die is a no-win tactic, a no-win strategy, it will not allow us to win, we will continue to lose people. kill soldiers on that side ok we kill 1200 a day does that make a difference a year and a half ago we were killing thousands a day that made a difference the answer is no we are still in the same situation but we ourselves are now weakened , because we are losing people, so i back to planning again, we need to plan and change tactics so that syrskyi's words turn into reality, this will not happen without the foundation... changes in the system, new doctrine, new prescribed methods, elimination of meaningless bureaucracy everywhere, better training of personnel, all this has happen, then we will be able to win because we will be better than them. dear colonel grant, you see, well, the plans of the enemy plus or minus

have been clarified and it has become clear, so that now the enemy will be pulling in additional manpower and will try reach. concrete results during the end of the summer campaign, at the beginning of the spring campaign, the second point will be the destruction of our energy structure, that is , they have already gone for it, and we understand that until additional air defense systems are put in, our population will experience additional suffering. the enemy is also counting on this, hoping that there will be an intra-ukrainian scenario. i hope that we can hold the situation, but the enemy... is counting on it, and the third point, yes, it the uncertainty is connected with the american election campaign, if we talk about the russian plans, how do you see them? let me go back to your first thesis that russia is betting that energy

issues can divide ukrainian society, this month when i was in ukraine for a few weeks, i did not welcome any tension on this issue, on the contrary, many people do to the situation with a certain... irony and joke about it. i went to a bar in kyiv, where the head waiter informed everyone: "we are on generators, so you will not be able to order fries, but anyone can have a hot dog," and everyone laughed. this shows that ukrainians are not letting energy problems affect their spirit. so there is a certain level of acceptance that ukrainians will not be overcome by something as minor as electricity. whether it's lights or anything else, and i haven't noticed any significant complaints or negative reactions. but in the spring, if it goes through the winter, it can be very, very harsh the situation may

change, but there is an important point: ukrainians - strong people, hard times didn't break britain during ww2 and i don't see that in hard times. now ukraine has been changed or broken, i do not feel this and do not hear such conversations from people, on the contrary, i hear stubbornness and determination. people say that they are ukrainians, and such trifles cannot overcome them. this is what i heard in kyiv and in sumy, last week when i was there, maybe the situation in lviv is a little different, but this is exactly what i heard in kyiv and sumy. one way or another, let's return to the topic of russia. i don't think russia has a problem with recruitment, as we imagine. she may have difficulty finding people, but the large sums of money offered for service attract tens of thousands of russians, because these sums are too large to ignore, if they are offered money for a year, two or three jobs for one month of service, many people are ready

to join the army, so i don't think putin is facing an acute shortage of people yet, but his real problem is leadership and a lack of qualified officers, many of whom... were needed to lead the troops already died in the early days of the war, we killed many of their generals and key commanders. now putin has to shake it off, replace them with new people, look for new commanders for battalions and other units. and i suspect that many of these new battalion commanders are not capable of effectively managing their units, and are there simply because they are someone's friend, not because they have experience or skills. such a thing... but i think that with russia one should always be careful about possible surprises. as i mentioned before, they don't predictable, they came through kharkiv, we didn't expect it, nobody seems to have expected it, grast, and what are they going to do

next, they are going to do something again unpredictable, this is russia, can the war escalate again through belarus, or will they decide to attack? somewhere else, who knows, but they will definitely try something new. the main problem is that russia continues to build up its resources and exhaust us step by step. they have more resources than we do. if they decide to transfer their forces to another place, to us will be able to stop them. but every time we stop them, it also prevents us from developing counterattacks and training our battalions and brigades in new methods. so we risk remaining the same as we were from 2014 to 2022, just a defensive army in the trenches instead of a capable army. i want

to remind our tv viewers that retired british army colonel glen grant, a well-known military expert, worked for them now, god save the king, glory to ukraine, glory to ukraine and god, save the king, may he live long, may he live long. there are discounts representing the only discounts on toloxen strong 10% in pharmacies of travel pam and savings there are discounts representing the only discounts on glyciset and glycised max 20% in pharmacies psyllium bam and savings her discounts represent the only discounts on norwend express 10% in pharmacies of travelers you and osha .

vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of air time. two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about war, about military, front, component. serhii zgurets. but how does the world live? yuri fizer is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchavka field with me and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. about cultural news. alena chekchenina, our art viewer, is ready to talk in the good evening. presenters who have become like relatives to many. already next to me ready to talk about the weather this weekend. and also distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us. mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day. events of the day in two hours. vasyl's big broadcast. in winter, a project for smart and caring people in the evenings with espresso.

your place is waiting for you. light. it stays on, for dinner, what you love, a warm bed is made, there will be walks, swings and swimming, you are waiting for you on your streets, at school, in your church, because in your house they see dreams about you, you are always in front of their eyes, by they cry for you, they pray for you, we

did not give up, because we knew that you are already somewhere nearby, half the battle is to know how difficult victory is, and we will do everything to get it faster. to hug you, so when you are home, when we are together, we are more than a family, we are a nation united around you. now the espresso tv channel will be working with... the iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat roman bezsmertny. glory to ukraine, mr. roman,

glad to see you. glory to heroes. good afternoon, mr. antin. the visit of the minister of foreign affairs, mr. kuleba, to the people's republic of china republic we understand that some of it was public, some was not public. one's meeting with china's foreign minister lasted more than three hours. i think there may have been some accompanying conversations. we understand that this fits into the general process. this is how the world argued in hearing trump and the corresponding changes, trump's plus-minus concept is clear, so he wants to force in one way or another, if not... russia, then ukraine, he will also need a result. roman petrovich, how do you evaluate the present? well, i won't say historical, but extremely important negotiating point. the first thing to pay attention to in the story surrounding president kuleba's trip to gwangju is the place itself, the form, and the content, because here

only fragments of the first, second, and third can be understood. that no more than 10, well, a maximum of 15% of what happened there got into the information field. well, you don't need to be too prepared there to understand that even for the sake of a three-hour conversation with the minister, you don't need to go to ganjava. first of all, what kind of city is this? this is a city where one of the highest is present level, diplomats and officials, both from... the united states of america and great britain. first, i don't mean first by chance, it shows that if there was a bilateral meeting, it would take place in beijing. this means that meetings take place far beyond the boundaries of bilateral dialogue. now let's move on to what you can do

for three days, three days, because well, you can hold, let's say, three meetings and come back with that. back and what to expect? well, first of all, if the calculation was for a sweet candy and result, then mr. kuleba would not go there, but the head of the yarmak office would go there, and everyone is writing about it, talking about it now, and it is true, that is, it is technological work that is carried out there, now that is the subject of this work, so why should three days and such a multi -echeloned... multi-layered cake. let's pay attention to what has been happening in the last two weeks in order to realize how much it has affected ukrainian-chinese, ukrainian-american, ukrainian-british, ukrainian-european relations, because we need to find an answer here. and so, the first thing you remember, and we all remember, orban's trip,

moscow, beijing, washington, kyiv, moscow. and as a result of the decision of the ukrainian government to stop the transit of oil through the friendship oil pipeline, because as it turned out, orbán did not just go for a ride, but renewed the contracts related to the supply to russia of components and components of missile and space weapons that hungary and the company hungary purchased. the netherlands, france, germany and great britain, and through third-fifth companies, through china, it was sent to russia. ukrainian reaction government on these actions of orban was a castle, just stop, oil pipeline friendship. second, the information that president biden

has delegated the authority to introduce and control sanctions. in relation to china, to issues related to russian aggression against ukraine, to yelen's ministry of finance, this is very interesting information, because she says that these issues have been transferred to the technological level, that is, they are monitored 24 hours a day, this is another thing, and of course, that it is caused by the previous information i said and the conversations that took place conducted during the nato summit in washington, where he showed himself rather strangely, strangely, i will say so, for the nato environment, the same orban. the third thing that should not be overlooked is how information from the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine regarding

minister kuleba's trip to china was returned to moscow. pay attention, make an accent there. a cut, copied phrase that ukraine is already ready to sit down at the negotiating table tomorrow. and one more important thing: if china did not behave itself, but caught in the eyes of the bullies, it has an extreme the need to maintain relations with ukraine, because these are 9 million tons of grain, because these are things related to titanium, supplies. and titanium sponges are things that are related to rare earth metals, that is, it is a whole series of complex technologies that are actually bilateral, i.e. therefore, it is even visible from the rhetoric and the tone of the rhetoric between kyiv and beijing, but as we see, the meeting

is taking place in guangzhou, i once again noted that it is a free economic zone, it is the capital of china's relations with the whole world, and when, as we we remember, the meetings took place with by secretary of state blinkin there and...they didn't happen in beijing, they happened in gongzhou, that's very important to understand. and so, what could be the content of these negotiations? of course, the issue of bilateral relations is certainly a topic related to china's initiatives, but in this case , i would put the topics related to the so-called negotiation process not second, not third, even fourth, if it came to that. . language, then it concerned only basic things. and so, first, the un charter and the principle of sovereignty and territoriality

integrity, and it quickly sounded and covered everything. the second is the principle of conducting negotiations, as was defined by the ukrainian side, through certain mediation. and can china in this case count on such a status. china cannot in this case. to count on his status as an intermediary, because he is not suitable, he is on the side of the enemy, he is a satellite of moscow, and kulema very tactfully made this clear. however, in this situation there is a certain coincidence of information, which is now quite often repeated by president zelensky, about the so-called negotiation process, about the myruchi summit of the russian side, which needs. such a meeting and also guangzhou, i will explain why, because i am convinced that in guangzhou, in addition to the contacts that i have already mentioned, including, obviously, there was a dialogue at

the technological level with a certain representative of the russian side, or an authorized representative who what could the same wang yi be in relation to the conditions and possibilities of the participation of the russian side in such a summit, otherwise... such a coincidence of the informative and concluding phrase that was voiced the president of ukraine regarding the negotiation process and the format of the summit mir chergovoi was not present. from my point of view, to date, including what mr kuleba has done, what boris johnson has done, the famous article, what robert o'bryan has done in the famous article, these are the so-called touchstones. right away, mr. antin, i want to say that they are not worth paying attention to, because it will not be possible to launch any negotiation process in the current conditions, not because

washington, brussels, beijing do not want it, but it will not happen for the simple reason that moscow considers any negotiation process as a trap, and not only for ukraine, but also for those who speak about it the most today, and this makes it clear, in my article i am already cursed and already completely put these words in quotation marks , not a hero boris johnsonyuk, because what he writes there is clearly visible, you can think anything you want, but there is only one way to put the führer in his place, that is force. i agree with you, mr. romany, well , look, there are two more very important signals, one signal came, oddly enough, from kremlin. that is, they immediately reacted in this way to the meeting with kulebe zvanni, and accordingly they said that it was not the time, let's say, to conduct

any negotiations, and again they undermined the legitimacy of our government, that is , they are already definitively betting on some other scenario, perhaps except power, power scenario plus, and you very rightly noted johnsonyuk’s visit to trumpanyuk, and we understand that... ramponyuk can be a very unpleasant surprise, so i don’t call for quarreling with him and so on, but we understand that in there will be a solution generated by donald trump's office of simple solutions, yes, and these solutions can be our money, whatever we want, and this case that accompanied it, an extremely high activity of the so-called gray diplomacy, here i completely agree with you, gray diplomacy begins to draw one or another scenario, but everything rests... on the one hand, the ambition of the führer, who says no, and, accordingly, china, who says: yes, yes, negotiations are possible, but not now, not at this moment, but from my point of view.

sociologists in the coming weeks will show the dominance of garis in relation to trump. what can trump do? understanding one's weakness and the need to radically change the strategy and tactics of the election campaign. he will start hurrying, he will start answering all these questions in a hurry, and we will get many more surprises. and i urge everyone to be ready. to these surprises, therefore, if yesterday you and i could talk about the fact that, yes, trump has a better chance, and biden may or may not, then today i can say with full responsibility, trumps, in this match, they don't look like the leaders of the race, and what will happen in the final, well, i won't say today that trump can lead

in... and the race, but the most important thing is not that, the important thing is that the united states of america in the figure of kamala harris , about which you can say anything you want, but this is not just a tough person, as joe biden called her in the last speech, this is a political shark, which, like the gangs in california, bit the spines, is violent. fraudsters and so on, she will do the same to everyone if she wins, and internal and external criminals. actually, this is the request for a tough person that america needed, that is, this is the case when in the coming months, despite the fact that the election campaign in the united states of america is intensifying, we will also have a certain correction

externally. political course, i would not compare and equate the foreign policy of biden with the foreign policy of kamala harris, especially since you have to go back and carefully read her speeches, if only at all the munich security conferences, it is a smile, as experts write, not women, the way she laughs in response to trump's meanness, it's a smile you... a game. and in fact, behind this turn there are a lot of known, but even more unknown things. from here i can say that in ukraine in this situation, first of all, if the political leaders do not know what and how to do, they should at least be silent, because in the current situation the chances have not just leveled off, but the prospect

of obscurity is ahead of us. ot. mr. roman, the perspective of the unknown, i would like you now to highlight certain points with the torch. to things, i would like to remind our tv viewers how at one time an extremely unsuccessful part of the ukrainian political community tried to play along against joseph biden, in particular, we remember how they released whom into the public arena? andrii derkach, yes, the son of the former head of the security service of ukraine, who is now accused of espionage for russia and... a photo in the main office of russian intelligence, well, this is a lyric, now is a historical moment, indeed, very appropriate, you also mentioned valery's speech zaluzhny, so was the article, the interview of the commander-in-chief syrsky, this is actually about scenarios, we understand, on the one hand there is a plan, so to speak, of putin, orban, maybe trump, who suits them, then there is the harsh ukrainian reality, because the enemy is going to strike on energy and on... . then we

will try to neutralize this matter with the help of air defense systems, but in any case, if the scenario goes into the winter, in the spring we may have a slightly different mood of society, and it is not known whether it will be in the spring or in the middle of winter, and the enemy on it also calculates, well and accordingly and donald trump, he will actively play with what he will be offered, for example, the environment of putin-orban, it is important that... to do what we talked about, materials printed by boris johnson, robert o'brien, theses expressed by valery zaluzhny, already as the ambassador of ukraine to great britain at the royal conference, further interviews of syrskyi were not analyzed as separate self-sufficient things, because they all overlap. and yes, a few takeaways from this big size and big one.