do you think the russians will redeploy again? no, nothing special will happen, in general this is not a redeployment, it is just a flight of planes for maintenance at their main base, they were on the deer, so they will remain, because they did not hit any of the 95th there, uh, in general, they hit the deer , this is a base, there is the 40th mixed... tion regiment, where there is only one squadron of such tu-22m3 aircraft, just go there, it is one of the bases of long-range russian strategic aviation, that is why they were temporarily transferred there from engels bomber, tu-95 ms bombers, well, maybe some of them will be transferred, as i said , to seryshevo in the amur region, yes there, so that there are fewer, because in general, for the russians , the number of missiles they... launch,

three or four are enough for them bombers, ugh, i think that these rollovers are more related to the need for aircraft maintenance, well, civil aviation, it's called checks, because the plane is there once for a certain period, once a month, once every six months, once a year must pass the testing of all its own onboard systems, since this cannot be done in alenia, they are thrown back. in engels, because it is, so to speak, the base airfield of strategic aviation, all this equipment is there, there is no such thing in alenia, well, in fact, so as not to engage in hat-making, i don’t know what to call it, of course, this is the success of the ukrainian military, damage to the deer, but at the same time we understand that they are relocating, another repair base anywhere in the territory of the russian federation, when they will have to shoot. they will reach the starting

lines, do their dirty work and will fly back, well, that is, let's say, in their attempts to attack our country from the air , little can change, for sure. at the same time, mr. valery, i have a question for you, and this is the success of our army on allenna, can it somehow, well, once again put the discussion with our partners on pause about the need for us to receive goods and supplies. on the use of very long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation, deep into their bodies? hardly, hardly, because you understand, this should be a joint decision of all nato members, and the united states plays the main violin here, and in general i would not call this weapon too long-range, 300 km, and that is the maximum distance, well, maybe there are separate ones. not

the export versions of the scalp and storm shdow, they may have a longer range there, more than 300 km, yes, but this is a weapon that will only allow us to suppress the activity of russian aviation at the front airfields located, well, at this range, yes there, well, kursk, maybe, yes, i don't remember, the distance to morozovsk, these are the two regiments where the kabivtsi carriers are based, yes, well we stormed a little in the kuban. it would be possible to land them so that they would not fly there, but in general, western weapons are not so long-range, but we actually need to improve our drones, so what pleased me was that our scouts said that they hit a tu-22m3 bomber, well, if this is true, if it is so, then it means that the drones have guidance equipment, a guidance system, that is, the drone is flying. tracks

the target, yes, and it himself, makes the decision to hit it himself, because he no longer has a connection with operator at such a range, if this is so, then this is a significant step, although it significantly increases the cost of the drone, but in general , western weapons, well, i don’t expect it, the f16 will arrive, well, i don’t want to give my head to be cut off, yes, but at 99 % certain that they will receive only weapons. air-air, that is , they will not be able to work on ground targets at all, well, except with missiles, anti-radar missiles, yes, this question has been hanging and will be hanging, radical changes in the political leadership are needed here, mr. valery, you said that that we have certain successes in refining drone capabilities, this makes these technologies more expensive, but it is definitely worth it...

at the same time, the russian federation is obviously switching to cheaper tools and the occupiers can already use cheap drones to detect ukrainian air defenses. this is what reuters says, during the attacks on ukraine, russia began to use some completely new uavs, which are much cheaper and means that they can be made more, what do we know and what are the challenges we face in relation to this innovation, well you ask about the new gerber drones, which have already been identified, but the quality. they have already been tested, there, well, the words are not worth the good, and they can be used mainly, well, their main purpose is to distract our air defense, so in the case, let's say, in the case of the shaheds, they can do it, but when

raids, let's say cruise missiles, they will be intercepted very quickly, that is, there is a system of air target selection, right? selection by speed, if these drones try to cover the rockets in flight with speed, well the cruise missile has a cruising speed of about 750 km/h, the speed of this drone is only 200, it's just the computer part of the radar, it will just cut off the targets at that speed, yes, it won't, they won't clutter the screen, that is, they won't air defense will respond. but if the shaheds, well the gerani shaheds, will fly, yes, they are really similar in terms of speed, and they can generally complicate the situation for air defense forces, but i hope these drones will not be able to climb high,

their speed is generally the same lower than shahedov, well, there is a 14.5-horsepower engine, as far as i could understand from the photos and... in general, i think that mobile groups will cope with them, but, but still, you know, there will be extra trouble, and maybe , sometimes you will have to really spend missiles on them, if we are talking about the defense of particularly important objects, when there will be no time to understand who is flying. well, mr. valery, we are now talking about the fact that the enemy is actively conducting reconnaissance, right? for the past two weeks or so we've all been watching as shahed uavs are launched practically every night, yes, they are launched in the direction of kyiv region, zhytomyr region, on other days they are launched in the direction of the south, but still this direction, kyiv region, chernihiv region

, cherkasy region, zhytomyr region, together with these drones that we are talking about we are talking to you, so all this indicates, most likely, that the enemy is active. conducts intelligence, and what am i leading all this to? actually mass attacks, that is, mass attacks of such a plan as the attack on july 8, one of the most brutal, one of the most terrorist attacks, we still see that there have been no mass attacks for three weeks. don't you think that these three weeks the enemy has been actively conducting reconnaissance, including... equipping their tu-95 strategic bombers with 22 missiles in order to probably conduct such a massive attack somewhere or in the near future or in the near future, and if so, what objects

are the russians trying to identify in order to actually carry out such an attack? if i answered your question, yes, i was already taken under state protection. you know, because even vanga didn't tell you where they were going strikes are carried out, how many are massed, yes, i can only tell you that, so, for example, the transfer of russian bombers from base to base, it is not connected with that, so whether the ice will be massed or not massed, so the bombers, i tell you, they can hang missiles on them... they can both in alena and in engels, yes, so they can be used there during a mass raid from any point, there it is not a problem to load missiles on a military transport plane and transfer to that other point, yes, because

flew from engels, massive raids were carried out by enemy aviation, strategic aviation, yes, and also from alyeni actually flew to... engels, yes, because the launches were past engels, the launches were often from the caspian sea, well, so that the rocket , if it does not work, so that the ends are in the water, yes, as has already happened. yes, yes, yes, he is, and when they, there were several cases when they were launched from land, yes, and rockets fell in the volgograd region and in other regions, yes, here, well, the situation is kind of like this, that is, to clearly answer your , to your question, i simply cannot, because you want too much, let's say, directly, mr. valery, well, let's talk about what we can talk about, the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine. claimed that on july 26 , ukrainian defense forces struck the saka airfield in occupied crimea. literally

a year and a half ago, we discussed this as wow news, but now the strikes on crimea, in particular on the airfields located there, have become routine for us in a good sense, the routine work of the defense forces, this does not mean that it is easy work, it is thought that it is difficult to plan operations, but they are carried out and carried out successfully. satellites are literally appearing today. images that indicate that there are places that are black, so to speak, there was most likely a fire there, su-30 aircraft were based there, the resolution of the images from the satellite is not very good so far, but less so calm down on july 26 there was definitely no sacks at the airfield, my question to you, in the event that we receive and when we receive the f16, in general or? can we talk about the parity of air battles, and can we say that if and take off from

airfields, in particular in the occupied territories, it is unlikely that it will successfully shoot back or directly support the combat line of combat, well, let's say, so, so far, history does not know any aerial combat between f-16s and russians. su-35, we were mainly talking about the su-35, but the last eight su-30 cm, they were already released with the same radars, and with the same weapons, that is , optional long-range r-37 missiles with a range of 300 km, yes, were released, by the way, three of them are located precisely in sacks, why are they being beaten, so that these planes are exactly the same. disable, so tell you what will happen after the appearance

of the f-16, by the way, not many f16, i do not know, and i cannot say, and no serious aviation expert will tell you what will happen, who, who will win these aerial battles, it is possible to talk about parity, about superiority in the air with the acquisition of the f-16, it is unlikely, because it is not known with what weapons... we will receive these american fighters, and what will be there in the airborne defense system, which are responsible for to divert enemy missiles from the sides of these planes, that's why for now, this question remains, well, it is waiting for a practical solution, there will be air battles, then we can say that, for example, these fighters are fine, we can increase their number, there are 128 there... 300 is possible, they work, yes, if the first battles will show that

they are not capable of conducting air battles on parity terms, yes, then we will need to ask other questions of the allies, please upgrade, that is, improve the equipment and weapons of these planes, and in general, the head of lock martin, well, the vice president of the concern lokin martin, he said that any... on the 16th we can bring the block 70-72 up to standard, that is , the last, the last model of this aircraft, there are probably long-range weapons there, there are already radars with a range greater than the russian one, there are 350 km, half of the equipment from the f-35 aircraft, that is , the fifth generation fighter, that is, what will be there, i would wait for now, the only thing i can say is unlikely to be a few aircraft ... what we should get in the near future, unlikely they will immediately be used in air

battles with russian fighters, rather than that's all, their first task will be air defense, just in anticipation, as you say, of possible mass strikes by the russians, mr. valery, we are sincerely grateful to you for your opinions, for your expert assessment, valery romanenko, aviation expert, leading scientist of the state. of the aviation museum was broadcast live on the espresso tv channel. we move on with you and remind you of course about our survey: do you think the case of the murder of iryna farion. open, absolutely free, you can take your smartphones or phones and vote if you think yes, dial 0800 211 381, if you think not, 0800, 211 382, ​​you can also vote, at the end of this hour we will collect the first results, we will

vote with you until the end of the next hour, and now we congratulate alexandra. kraevo, an expert of the foreign policy council, ukrainian prism. oleksandr, glory to ukraine. glory to the hero, i congratulate you. well, and with you as an americanist, we will probably start talking about the latest trends now. i am sure that you follow what is happening in the election process in the united states. the ukrainians darkened their eyes and became very familiar with the system in the states in general, how it works. it seems to me that... that for the general development for ours this is an exceptionally good story, but, but everything will be decided this fall, and for now, at what stage are we, at what stage are the states? well , now it is obvious that the active work of the candidates continues, both with their headquarters and in individual districts and in individual states. for haris and her team , the key issue now

is to select this team in principle, and here the issue is not only in the position of the vice president, of whom there are so many is being discussed because he's...supposedly supposed to balance the party, the question really is generally who will go to the white house with her, that is, who will she nominate as secretary of defense, that is, secretary of defense, who will she nominate for secretary of state, who will be the national security adviser, all these questions are still open, and although usually in the political history of the united states, vice presidents, if they became president under certain conditions, they pulled up their team with whom they worked before, now it is possible ... such that some people from the biden administration may stay with harris in this cabinet, but for trump's team, well, in general , they have already run out of this hype after the attempt on his life, and they need to understand two things informationally: first, what is the future built on their company, and how they can win additional supporters, that is, not only republicans, not only trumpists, how can they win over an independent voter, and secondly, if not

more importantly, what they can drown kamala harius on, that is, if their rhetoric about biden was clear.. . we have heard it already four years, so what, what to attack, let's say, kamala haris as an opponent, so far on fox news and the american network, she is mainly attacked for allegedly wanting to ban plastic straws for cocktails, that is, until that there are not so many options, let's say, well, she is accused of being unemployed, and we are talking now, most likely, about the vice president in the case of donald trump's presidency, and how do you like it? yes , well, he really, let's say this, provocatively enough attacked kamala harris, we saw that even some republican politicians said that, young man, you are in no position to judge other women, especially the women of political opponents, and even though you and i are in the same party, but hold your horses, boy, because it was actually a not the kind of rhetoric that is needed now to unify

the party and supposedly unify americans that donald trump is proposing. vance is generally very difficult. situation, because despite his absolute loyalty to trump, despite the fact that he is a convenient candidate for trump, but polls even of republican centers now indicate that he is the least popular candidate for vice president in the last 60 years, here it is worth saying that the previous least popular candidate was a master of the ku klux klan, so he has very serious competition in this field. what is the current interest rate, mr. oleksandr, as of now? er, i guess we should start here by saying that... so far we haven't seen either harris' team or the strategy, and while trump has at least some understanding of how he will work with whom, then kharis is still a brand of one person, and therefore it is very difficult to clearly say whether these are really the percentages that she will have at the end, so these are only such intermediate results, but according to the intermediate results, we can see, well, let's say , ipsos, reuters, pure research institute, they all

give indicators that hayris is either on par with trump or starts within a statistical margin of error in... so really, how for a candidate who just a week ago, literally a week and a half ago started his campaign, as for a candidate who is before that was considered the weakest of the democratic potential candidates, this is a very, very good result, despite the fact that, as i said, there may be some margin of error there . mr. alexander, i would like to talk to you about the various plans, trump's plans that are emerging. every day, every week, for the last few weeks, we heard a lot of them, something, something from johnson, now a new plan to end the war in... the country has allegedly already been proposed by a ukrainian, american politician, republican, boris pincus. he stated that the peace plan trump either is, or should be

, to offer putin to quickly leave the occupied territories, and if putin does not agree, then in this case, to provide ukraine with an unlimited amount of resources, weapons , and so on and so forth. let us listen, and then proceed to the discussion. of this next plan, trump's plan trump's plan, according to our sources, is as follows: he will offer putin to leave all the occupied territories, he will give him time, a short time, otherwise he will simply say that he will be forced to provide ukraine with super-modern types of weapons that no one has ever received abroad, but ukraine will receive in unlimited quantities, so that ukraine can simply... execute these barbarians by force beyond the borders of 91, this will be trump's plan . sir, mr. oleksandr, you believe in

yet another plan, this is the third or fourth plan, the one outlined for us by individual, whether former politicians or current politicians, but we have not heard any plan, well, a really thorough one , from trump, except. speeches he made during his election rallies, this new plan of trump, is it possible to implement, or is this just another kind of talk that will end in absolutely nothing? the most i can tell you is that it is possible to discuss it, you are absolutely right that trump has not shown us any complete plan, and believe me, he will not show it before the election, and if we look at the way he talks about it on rally and... his own, as he talks about it in interviews, especially for fox news, he constantly says: you just choose me, i 'll figure it out, i'll be there or call, in others options, he says, i will put them at

the negotiating table and give ukraine weapons, then he unexpectedly says: no, ukraine will stop all this, i know how to do it, we will not give anything to russia, but we will not give anything to ukraine, that is, trump constantly, how the pendulum swings between absolute help to ukraine to what will force our country to full-fledged negotiations, and indeed, you are right to ask the question, so what... what will actually happen, what should we really expect? well, it will be very simple to say, no one knows this, but if we conduct a content analysis of all speeches, all interviews trump, it 's the same thing running through the whole thing, but i'm hoping that it's all over before i become president, so actually trump's plan is ideally that he won't have to deal with the ukrainian issue at all, because this is a difficult topic, this is a topic not only related to russian aggression against ukraine and our resistance, this topic concerns europe, this topic concerns... china, this topic concerns weapons, international trade, this is a complex, complex topic that he clearly does not want to deal with, and therefore all these new proposals from his former advisers,

perhaps future advisers, are actually their efforts, well, let's say this, to win over that part of the voters for whom issues of international politics and international security are important, because ukraine is precisely the marker of international politics and international security in these elections , that is, as far as we have to understand in... there are no real plans as of now, and all that we see in the ukrainian and american information spaces is simply, well, let's say nothing, that is, ukrainians should, relatively speaking, as far as i understand, stop in general to build some opinions for yourself at the expense of the fact that trump has a certain plan, so we really need to understand that trump has one plan in ... we need to win the election, if for this we have to say that we will give ukraine has all the necessary weapons, he will say that, if for this it is necessary to say that i will come to an agreement with putin, and ukraine is already the third, fifth, tenth issue there, he

will say that, but if we look at the last year and a half, when biden provided weapons for ukraine, a congress with a democratic part provided aid packages to ukraine, trump said that this should not be done, and ukraine is a corrupt hole like afghanistan, this is his quote from july last year, at moments when he could not sway the position of congress, trump suddenly wanted to bomb moscow, trump unexpectedly said about 120 billion for ukraine instead of 60, that is, it is important for us to realize one thing: for trump at this stage, the issue of ukraine, the issue of israel, the issue of taiwan, in general, the issue of partners and allies is a political issue, he uses it for to please the majority of voters, or sink the ratings of the democrats, and he will continue to do so until the election, with a clear strategy before the election. we will definitely not see from him. well, let's talk about those who act more systematically. us secretary of state anthony blinkin, during a meeting with chinese foreign minister wang yi, warned that

the united states. will take appropriate measures if beijing does not stop supporting the defense complex of the russian federation, and the ministry of foreign affairs, in turn, said that china will continue to persistently persuade and to promote peace talks between kyiv and moscow, i think that it is only about their vision of this peace process. well, mr. oleksandr, many believe that, in connection with the previous topic and the future possible presidency of donald trump, that the issue is just such confrontations. with china will be absolutely the order of the day because, well , because donald trump's own previous presidency was such a lead-up to this story, i even joked online that we 're a little bit in a different order, but we're already watching the plot come true series years and years, yes years, well, but less than that. china, the united states, as of now, where we are in the configuration of this... very

sensitive relationship, in order to understand the configuration of this relationship, let's say, you have to read the history of the cold war very well, you have to focus very well, especially on the period of 70 -x-80s, precisely on this balancing act between two great powers, between two world powers and dozens of small or large regional and international conflicts, in which each of the parties had its own interests, that is, china after... in more precisely, as a result of the meeting in san francisco, which took place between biden and xi, they very clearly stated their logic and their vision of the international system in general in their communique. they then said a phrase that i think will be memorized later at the faculty of international relations. they wrote that there are two states in the world that represent competing systems, the united states and the people's republic of china. they are different, they are incomparable, these two systems, but

there is enough in the world. a place for their parallel development, that is, china has clearly indicated that there is the interests of the two great powers, everything else is interesting as much as it is interesting in the confrontation between these two great powers, it does not mean that they want a nuclear war, no at all, they insist on this all the time, but here is this competition for minds, competition for markets , the competition is political, it will continue, and russian aggression against ukraine and ukrainian resistance to this aggression from the point of view of china, this is part of this game, from the point of view of the americans. they said it repeatedly, ukraine is first and foremost it is an ideological matter, it is a democracy that is fighting for its existence against a dictatorship, and for china it is a continuation of another policy, russia is weak there, which should become their raw material appendage, the west spends its money and its weapons there, and therefore does not pay attention to china , that is, for china, this situation is wonderful, and by the way, this is a short remark, it should be noted that the americans finally got the courage and after the trip of our

foreign minister to china, they: tai reminded that no matter what you say there is beautiful to ukrainians or to whom whatever, we know what you won't end up cooperating with russia because it's profitable for you, so it's good that the americans are finally calling a spade a spade. mr. oleksandr, thank you for joining the air of the tv channel, for your expert opinions and assessments. oleksandr kraev, expert of the foreign policy council, ukrainian prism and americanist. on the air of our tv channel, but we remind you that today we are asking you whether you consider the farion case solved, to the topic of the murder of irina farion, we will return in the second part of our program, as of now, we have the following results as follows: the absolute majority of our respondents , 94%, do not believe that the case is solved, and very few people believe that everything

has already been solved, and it is only a word. in court, then we will pass the floor to our colleagues from the bbc, they are also taking up the information initiative this evening, please, the separatist rebels destroyed the columns of russian mercenaries in mali, what from... is known about this case and exactly how the tuaregs destroyed the wagnerites, about it the following 15 minutes of the bbc broadcast in the studio in london, zhafemerov works. fighters of the russian-african corps - this mostly former mercenaries of the wagner pmc suffered heavy losses on the malian-algerian border. russian mercenaries advanced deep into the territories captured by the tuareg separatists, but on the night of july 26, when around

naymantsiv was already approaching the algerian border.