aviation at the front airfields located, well , at this distance, yes, kursksk, maybe, i don’t remember the distance to morozovsk, there are two regiments where the carriers of the kabavi are based, yes, and a little bit in the kuban, it would be possible to land attack aircraft there so that they would not fly especially there and in general, well, western weapons are not so long-range, but we actually need to improve our... drones, that's what pleased me that our scouts say that they hit a tu-22m3 bomber, well, if it's true, if it's true, then means that on drones have guidance equipment, a homing system, i.e., the drone follows the target when it arrives, yes, and it itself, makes the decision to hit it, because it no longer has contact with the operator at such a distance, if this is the case, then this is a significant step, although it increases significantly. the cost of the drone, yes

, but in general, western weapons, well, i don’t expect it, the f16 will arrive, well, i don’t want to give my head to be cut off, yes, but i’m 99% sure that they will only get weapons, air, air, that is, they won’t be able to work on ground targets, well, except for missiles, anti-radar missiles, yes , this question has been and will be, radical changes are needed here. in the political leadership, the respective countries, mr. valery, you said that we have some success in refining drone capabilities, it makes these technologies more expensive, but it is definitely worth it, at the same time, the russian federation is obviously moving to cheaper tools, and the occupiers can already use cheap drones to detect ukrainian air defenses, about this... says reuters, during attacks on ukraine,

russia has started to use some completely new uavs, which are much cheaper and means that they can be made more, what do we know and what are the challenges we face in relation to this innovation, well you are asking about new such gerber drones, but which have already been identified, quality they have already been transferred. there, well, kind words are not worth anything and can be used mainly, well, their main purpose is the distraction of our air defense, so in the case, let's say, in the case of the shaheds, they can do it, but during raids, let's say winged missiles, they will be intercepted very quickly, that is, there is a system of selection of air targets, yes selection... of speed, if these drones

are used to try to cover missiles in flight with a speed, well, a cruise missile has a cruising speed of approximately 750 km/h, the speed of this drone is only 200 , that's just the computer part of the radar, it will simply cut off the targets at such a speed, it won't happen, they won't clutter the screen, that is, they won't be responded to by air defense, but so... if the shaheds fly, well, the shaheds of gerani , yes, then here it is indeed, they are similar in speed, and they can, in general, complicate the situation for air defense troops, but i hope that these drones will not be able to climb high, their speed in general is also lower than that of shaheds, well, there is a 14.5 horsepower engine, as far as i could understand and identify the engine from the photos. yes, well,

in general, i think that mobile groups will cope with them, but, but still, you know, there will be extra trouble, and maybe sometimes you will have to really spend missiles on them, if we are talking about defense, especially important objects, when there will be no time to understand who is flying. well, mr. valery, you and i are now talking about the fact that the enemy is actively conducting reconnaissance, so for the last two weeks, i think we have all watched how almost every night shahed uavs are launched, so they are launched in the direction of kyiv oblast, zhytomyr oblast , on other days they are launched in the direction of the south, but still this direction, kyiv region, chernihiv region, cherkasy region, zhytomyr region, together with these drones that we are talking about with you, yes, all this indicates, most likely, that the enemy is actively conducting reconnaissance. and what am

i leading all this to? in fact, among mass attacks, that is, mass attacks of such a plan as the attack on july 8, it is one of the most brutal. one of the most terrorist attacks, we still see that there are no massive attacks for three weeks, don't you think that the enemy is actively conducting reconnaissance for these three weeks, including equipping its strategic bombers tu-95, tu-22 with missiles for to probably spend somewhere, or in the near future, or in the near future perspective, this is such a massive attack. and if so, what objects are the russians trying to identify in order to actually carry out such an attack, if i were to answer your question, yes, i have already been taken under state protection,

you know, because here even vanga did not say to you, where the strikes will be carried out, how massed, yes, i can only tell you that... so, for example, the transfer of russian bombers from base to base, it is not connected with that, which means that it will be massed or not massed ice, so bombers, i tell you, they can hang missiles on them, they can both in alena and engels, yes, that means they can also be used there during a mass raid from any point, there it is not a problem to... download missiles to a military transport plane and transfer it to one point or another, yes, because they flew from engels, mass air raids were carried out by enemy aviation, strategic aviation, yes, and in the same way from alyeni actually flew to engels, yes, because the launches were past engels, launches were

often from the caspian sea, well, in order to rocket, if it doesn't work, so that the ends are in the water, yes, as has already happened, that is, yes, yes, yes. yes, there were several cases when they were launched from land, and rockets fell in the volgograd region and in other regions, but the situation is like this, that is , i simply cannot answer your question clearly, because there are too many you want, let's say it directly, mr. valery, well, let's talk about what we can talk about, the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine confirmed that on july 26... the defense forces of ukraine struck the airfield sakas in the occupied crimea, literally a year and a half ago we talked about it as wow news, but now the strikes on crimea, in particular on the airfields located there, have become in a good sense for us the routine routine work of the defense forces, this does not mean , that this

is a simple job, i think that the operations are difficult to plan, but they are carried out and carried out successfully, today there are literally satellite images that testify to... that there are places that are black, and relatively speaking, there was most likely a fire there, su30 planes were based there, the resolution of the images from the satellite so far is not very good, but less so, on july 26th , there was definitely no raincoats at the airfield, my question to you, in the event that we receive and when we receive the f16, in general, can we talk about.. . the parity of air battles, and can we say that if it takes off from airfields, in particular in the occupied territories, then it is unlikely to successfully shoot back or directly support the battle line, well, let's say, so far

history does not know any air battle between f-16 and russian fighters. generation, that is, the su-35, it was mainly about the su-35, but the last eight su-30 cm, they were already released with the same radars, and with the same weapons, that is, optional long-range r-37 missiles with a range of 300 km, yes they were released, by the way, three of them are precisely in the sacks, why are they being hit, just so that these planes are out of order, that is why i will tell you what will happen after the appearance of the f-16, by the way, few , f-16s. i don't know, and i can't say, and no serious aviation an expert will not tell you what will happen, who will win these aerial battles,

it is possible to talk about parity, about air superiority with the acquisition of the f16, this is unlikely, because it is not known what weapons we will acquire. these american fighters, and what will be the airborne defense system that is responsible for diverting enemy missiles from the sides of these planes, well, that's it. therefore, for now, this question remains, well, it is waiting for a practical solution, there will be air battles, then we can say that, for example, these fighters are fine, they can be increased the number there is 128, there is 300, it is possible, they work, yes, if the first battles show that they are not capable of conducting air battles on parity terms, yes, then we will need to ask other ... questions of allies, please upgrade, that is improve the equipment and armament of these aircraft, and in general

the head of lock martin, well, the vice president of the lock martin concern, he said that any f-16 we can bring to the standard block 70-72, that is, the last, the last model of this aircraft, there it is probably a long-range weapon, there are already radars with a longer range. from russian there are 350 km, half of the equipment from the f-35 aircraft, that is, fifth -generation fighters, that is, what will be there, i would wait for now, the only thing that can be said is that it is unlikely that we will receive several aircraft in the near future, it is unlikely that they will immediately be used in air battles with russian fighters, most likely their first tasks will be air defense, just in anticipation, as you say, of possible massive strikes by the russians, mr. valeriu, we sincerely

thank you for your thoughts, for your expert assessment , valery romanenko, aviation expert, leading researcher of the state aviation museum, was on the live air of the espresso tv channel. we move on with you and remind you, of course, about our survey, whether you consider the case of the murder of iryna farion. covered absolutely free, you can take your smartphones or phones and vote, if you think yes, dial 0800-211-381, if you think no, 0800, 211 382, ​​you can also vote, already at the end of this hour we will match we have the first results, we will vote with you until the end of the next hour, and now we congratulate oleksandr kraev, an expert of the council. ukrainian prism of foreign policy, oleksandr, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, i congratulate you, i congratulate you, and

with you as an americanist, we will probably now start talking about the latest trends, i am sure that you follow what is happening in the pre-election process in the united states, ukrainians darkened their eyes and got to know the system in the states very well in general, how it works, it seems to me that for the general... for ours, this is an exceptionally good story, but, but everything will be decided this fall, and for now, where are we stage at which stage states? well, now it is obvious that the active work of the candidates continues, both with their headquarters and in individual districts and in individual states. for haris and her team, the key issue now is, in principle, to choose this team, and here the issue is not only the position of the vice president, who is being discussed so much, because he supposedly has a 'pro'. move the party, the question really is generally who will go to the white house with her, i.e. who will she

nominate as secretary of defense, i.e. secretary of defense, who will she nominate for the position of secretary of state, who will be the national security adviser, all these questions are still open, and although usually in the political history of the united states, vice presidents, if they became president under certain conditions, they pulled up their team with whom they worked before , now it is possible that some people... from the biden administration may stay in this cabinet together with harris, and for the trump team, well, in general, they are already running out of this hype after the attempt on his life, they need to understand two things things: firstly, what will their company be built on in the future and how can they gain additional supporters, i.e. not only republicans, not only trumpists, how can they win over an independent voter, and secondly, if not more importantly, what can they do to trample kamala harius, i.e. if their rhetoric about biden was clear and we have heard it for four... lessons, then why attack, let's say, kamala haris as an opponent,

so far on fox news and one america network she is mainly attacked for the fact that she allegedly wants to ban plastic straws for cocktails, that is, so far there are not many options, let's say, well, she is accused of idleness there, and we are talking now, most likely, about the vice president in the case of the presidency of donald trump, and how do you like it? indeed, let's say this, provocatively enough attacked kamala harris, we saw that even some republican politicians said that, well, young man , you are not in a position to judge women and... other, especially women, political opponents, and although you and i are in the same party, but hey, hold your horse a little bit, boy, because it was actually, well, not the kind of rhetoric that is needed now to unify the party and supposedly unify americans that donald trump is proposing. vance is in a very difficult situation in general, because despite his absolute loyalty to trump, despite the fact that he is a convenient candidate for trump, but

polls even by republican centers now indicate that he is the least popular candidate for vice president in the last 60 years , here it is worth saying that the previous least popular candidate was an m.sc ku klux klan, that is, he has a very serious competition in this field. what is the current interest rate, mr. oleksandr, as of now? i think it's worth starting here with the fact that we haven't seen harris' team or strategy yet, and while trump has at least some idea of ​​how he's going to work with whom, harris is still a one-man brand. , and so it 's very difficult to say clearly whether these are really the ... that she will have at the end, so these are just such intermediate results, but according to the intermediate results, we see, well, let's say, ipsos, reuters pure research institute, they all give indicators that harris is either on par with trump or is starting to be ahead of him within a statistical margin of error, so really, as for a candidate who just a week ago, literally a week and a half ago, started her

campaign, as for a candidate, which was previously considered to be the weakest of the democratic potential candidates, this is a very... very good result, even though, as i said, there may be some margin of error there . mr. oleksandr, i would like to talk to you about various plans, plans trump, which emerges, almost every day, every week, the last few weeks, we have heard them a lot, something, something from johnson, here is now a new plan to end the war in ukraine, supposedly already. proposed ukrainian, american politician, republican, boris pinkus. he stated that trump's peace plan is, or should be, to offer putin to quickly withdraw from the occupied territories, and if putin does not agree, then to provide ukraine with an unlimited amount of resources,

weapons and so on and the like. let us listen, and then we will move on to the discussion of this next one. trump's plan, trump's plan, according to our sources, is this: he will offer putin to leave all the occupied territories, he will give him time, a short time, otherwise he will simply say that he will be forced to provide ukraine with super-modern types of weapons that no one has ever received abroad, but ukraine will receive in unlimited quantities, so that ukraine can simply fulfill by force. barbarians beyond in 1991, this will be trump's plan. sir, mr. oleksandr, you believe in yet another plan, this is the third or fourth plan, the one outlined for us by individual, former or current politicians, but we

have not heard any plan, well, a really thorough one, from trump, except for those speeches which he carried out during his election rallies, is this new plan of trump, is it possible to implement, or is this just another kind of talk that will end in absolutely nothing? the most i can tell you is that it is possible to discuss, you you are absolutely right when you say that trump has not shown us any complete plan, and believe me, he will not show it before the election, and if we look at how he talks about it at rallies and his own, how he does... he says this in an interview especially for fox news, he constantly says: "you just elect me, i 'll figure it out, i'll be there or call", in other versions he says: "i'll put them at the negotiating table and give ukraine weapons." then he unexpectedly says: "no, ukraine will stop all this, i know how to do it, we will not give anything to russia, but we will not give anything to ukraine." that is, trump constantly, like a pendulum, moves between absolute help to ukraine and what

will force our country to full-fledged negotiations. and indeed, you are asking the right question, so what really. will be, what to really expect? well, it will be very simple to say, no one knows this, but if we conduct a content analysis of all trump's speeches, all interviews, there is the same phrase everywhere on a cross-cutting theme, but i hope that it will all be finished before then , how will i become president, that is, in fact, trump's plan is ideally in the fact that he will not have to work with the ukrainian topic at all, because it is a complicated topic, it is a topic not only about russian aggression against ukraine and our resistance, this topic concerns europe, this topic concerns china, this topic... concerns weapons of international trade, this is a complex, complex topic, which he clearly does not want to deal with, and therefore all these new proposals from his former advisers, perhaps future advisers, are actually their efforts... well, let's say, to win over the part of the voters for whom the issue of international politics, there is international security important, because ukraine is precisely the marker of international politics, international security in

these elections, that is, as far as we can understand, trump has no real plans as of now, and everything we see in the ukrainian and american information spaces is just let's say nothing, that is... ukrainians should, relatively speaking, as far as i understand, generally stop building any opinions for themselves at the expense of the fact that trump has a certain plan. yes, we really need to understand that trump has one plan, he needs to win the election. if for this it is necessary to say that we will give ukraine all the necessary weapons, he will say so. if for this it is necessary to say that i will come to an agreement with putin, and ukraine is already the third, fifth, tenth issue there, he will say that. well, if we look. for the last year and a half, when biden provided arms to ukraine, the congress with the democratic part provided aid packages to ukraine, trump said that this should not be done, and ukraine is

a corrupt hole like afghanistan, this is his quote from july last year, in moments, when biden could not sway the position of congress, trump suddenly wanted to bomb moscow, trump suddenly said about 120 billion for ukraine instead of 60, that is, it is important for us to realize one thing: for trump at this stage , the issue of ukraine. the issue of israel, the issue of taiwan, in general, the issue of partners and allies is a political issue, he uses it in order to please the majority of voters, or to drown the ratings of the democrats, and he will continue to do this before the elections, we definitely do not have a clear strategy before the elections from him let's see well let's talk about those who act more systematically. us secretary of state anthony blinkin , during a meeting with chinese foreign minister wang yi, warned that the united states would act accordingly. measures, if beijing does not stop supporting the defense complex of the russian federation, and vani, in turn , stated that china will continue to persistently persuade and promote peace negotiations

between kyiv and moscow, i think that it is only about their vision of this peace process. well, mr. oleksandr, well, that's a lot who believes that, in connection with the previous topic and the future possible presidency of donald trump, that the issues are just such confrontations with china. will become the absolute order of the day, because, well, because the previous presidency of donald trump was so predisposed to this story, i even joked online that we are a little bit in a different order, but we are already watching how the plot of the series years and years comes true, so years, well, but less with china, the united states, as of now, where we are in the configuration of these very... left-wing relations. for in order to understand the configuration of these relations, let's say, you need to read the history of the cold war well, you need

to focus very well, especially on the period of the 70s and 80s. this is precisely the balance between two great powers, between two world powers and dozens of small or large regional and international conflicts, in which each of the parties had their own interests, that is, china as a result. more precisely, the meeting in san francisco that took place between biden and xi, they very clearly stated their logic in their communique and his vision of the international system in general. they then said a phrase that i think will be memorized later at the faculty of international relations. they wrote that there are two states in the world that represent competing systems, the united states and the people's republic of china. they are different, they are incomparable, these two systems, but there is enough space in the world for their... parallel development, that is, china has clearly indicated that there are interests of two great powers, everything else is interesting as much as it is interesting in the confrontation of these two great powers, it does not mean that they want to

nuclear war, absolutely not, they insist on this all the time, but this competition for minds, competition for markets, competition is political, it will continue, and russian aggression against ukraine and ukrainian resistance, these aggressions from the point of view of china, this is part of this game, from the point of view of the americans, they said it more than once. calling ukraine is primarily an ideological matter, it is a democracy that is fighting for its existence against a dictatorship, and for china it is a continuation of another policy, there is a weak russia, which should become their raw material appendage, there is the west spends its money and its weapons, and therefore does not pay attention to china, that is, for china, this situation is excellent, and by the way, this is a short remark, it should be noted that the americans finally got the courage even after the trip of our foreign minister to china, they china was reminded that... no matter what you say to the ukrainians or to anyone else, we know that you will not end cooperation with russia because it is beneficial to you, so it is good that the americans are finally calling a spade a spade. mr.

oleksand. thank you for joining on the air of the tv channel, for your expert opinions and assessments, oleksandr kraev, expert of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prism and americanist was on the air of our tv channel. yes, we remind you that today we are asking you whether you consider the farion case solved, we will return to the topic of the murder of iryna farion in the second part of our program, we will turn to... and now our results are as follows: the absolute majority of our respondents 94% do not believe that the case is solved, and very few people believe that everything is actually solved, and speech is only a word for judgment. there are discounts representing the only discounts on toloxengel, 10% in the pharmacies of travel pam and oskad, there are

discounts representing there are... in the pharmacies of plantain, vam and oskad. there are discounts representing the only discounts on glycysed and glycysed max 20% in the pharmacies of traveling bam and ochad, there are discounts representing the only discounts on mikrolax, 20% in the pharmacies of traveling bam and ochad. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, that's great. on the spresso tv channel. two hours of air time. two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important thing two hours to learn about the war, about the military, the frontline component. serhiy zgurets. but how does the world live? yuriy feder is already in front of me and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchyvka with me and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company are favorite. on

the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is with us at communication, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you, have a good day. the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia is already on the verge of exhausting its resources. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do? are they able to use, say, the resources there.

of the lukashenka army allied with them. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project: read the entire condemnation. thank you, it was difficult, but i was just curious, but i absolutely did not eat it. they help to understand the present and predict the future. they offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. political club. every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports on them, but it was not enough to know what was happening. it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 13:10 with a repeat at 22:00. studio event with anton borkovsky at espresso. we continue the new

week with espresso. thank you for being with us, these are khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smolii. in the second hour, we promised you an honest conversation with our honest, sincere, frank thoughts about what is happening, about the trends that are now emerging within our countries. i think it's very important, really, especially when it comes to critical moments, and certainly the most critical event of recent times is the assassination of irina farion, and the thing is that we people who were involved in information and analysis of information could often turn to the person of irina.