is managing now and said that they want to create an analytical center, this analytical center should be created by the end of the year, and in fact the employees of this center will help the members of the commission in conducting evaluations of candidates, judges will collect all the necessary information there from open data from the same registers , however, four months have passed since the promise, nothing is being done and it is unlikely that such a center will be... really created by the end of the year, so now there is a very urgent need to elect a new head. one of the priorities tasks from the beginning of the work of the renewed higher qualification commission was to complete the qualification evaluation of judges from the big cities of kyiv, odesa, dnipro, and lviv. but the assessment has not yet been completed, moreover, the qualification assessment of the judges of the most scandalous liquidated district administration of kyiv has not even begun. most of the judges still haven't passed the tests. in the end. emids do not carry out

judicial proceedings, but they still receive millions of funds from the budget. the supreme council of justice does not consider complaints against such judges, as a result of which we may have dismissal, and so on we have such a warm bath for the judges of oascu, when doing nothing you can get such a high judge's grape. 1,884 judges, local and appellate courts had to pass the qualification assessment. during the first year of work, the vkks managed to carry out only more than 130 interviews, there were panels that found out the source of the funds and the acquisition of property, and even certain decisions that the candidates made, however, unfortunately, there were some colleagues who did not take such information into account, they could simply read such application, the candidate could give a formal one an answer to one or two sentences, for example, the second panel above... the qualification commission

of judges, judging by everything, is very tired. ruslan sydorovych, lyudmila volkova and roman kydesiuk expertly manage to conduct the fastest interviews with candidates. for example, one of them lasted only 7 minutes with olena mikhalyuk, assistant to the head of the northern commercial court of appeal. please briefly describe your motivation for becoming a judge. first, how convenient will it be for you to move? mr. roman, but it won't be too much either. two judges of one family. these are all questions from the commission to mykhalyuk. thus, without further clarification, the members of the supreme court of appeals decided that the candidate was suitable for the position of judge and recommended her to the lyubashiv district court of odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, updated within the framework of the judicial reform , was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibilities. however, all members of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine went to high positions consciously and of their own free will. so we hope the commission will be able to restore. high level of efficiency. and for

today, that's all i have, it was judicial control and i, tatiana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. we are looking for 13-year-old olena and her 15-year-old brother artem yankovsky. these children lived in the kakhovsky district of the kherson region in the village of chaplinka, which has remained occupied since the first days of the war. information about the disappearance of children was received in february 2024. but there is still a place

it was not possible to establish the whereabouts of the brother and sister. it is quite possible that the boy and girl were taken to russia, or transported somewhere to the uncontrolled territories of ukraine. that is why we need your help. look closely at the faces of the missing. 13-year-old olena yankovska looks her age, she has gray-green eyes and light blond hair. the girl is very similar to her brother artem yankovsky. they have almost identical noses and lips. the boy looks a little older, he also has blond hair and gray-green eyes. they were last seen in the village of chaplinka in kakhov district of kherson region. also , the fate of three more girls, who also disappeared in the occupied territories of the kherson region, has remained unknown for a long time. attention to the screen. they are nine-year-old viktoria ostrovska, 12-year-old suzanne osman and others. i really hope for your

help, and of course, i am mostly addressing the residents of the territories of the kherson region that are not controlled by ukraine. look at the faces of the missing girls: victoria ostrovska looks nine years old, she has dark blond hair and brown eyes. a child disappeared in the skadovsky district of the kherson region, pro this became known to the police in the summer of last year. since then, there was no news about victoria ostrovska. suzanne osman, a 12 -year-old girl, has dark hair and dark eyes. the child lived in the village of bekhtery, which is also the skadovsky district of the kherson region. which still remains occupied. the search for the child has been going on for a year and a half. and this is 15-year-old angelina panfilyuk. the girl lived on the right bank of the kherson region in the bereslav district in the village of dudchany. the territory was occupied almost from the first days of the full-scale

war. but in the fall of 2022, she was released and it was during this period that angelina's disappearance became known. no one knows where the girl may be now. perhaps the child was taken to the temporarily occupied territories, or perhaps to russia in general. that is why your help is very important. if suddenly someone has information about the possible whereabouts of victoria, suzanne and angelina, or maybe just saw these girls somewhere, please let us know immediately. even a small piece of news can become very important. you can call the magnolia children's tracing service at any time of the day. by short number 11630. calls from all ukrainian mobile operators are free. if suddenly you are in the temporarily occupied territory and cannot make a call, write to the chat bot of the child search service in telegram. or look for us on facebook. and now regarding

the territories controlled by ukraine and a more or less peaceful life. unfortunately, children also disappear here, as the experience of the child tracing service shows, the vast majority of them are teenagers, who often simply run away. we talked about this topic with a psychologist and collected a lot of tips for parents who can certainly prevent a child from suddenly running away from home. one of them is about the importance of talking with children not only about everyday topics and matters, but also about your own feelings, experiences and fears. frankness , according to experts, will help not only open up to the child, but also sometimes even get support and help. show sincere interest in the child's personality, because often all our conversations with children, and especially with teenagers, boil down to a few topics: cleaning, grades, maybe some other material moments, but something completely different is important to them, it is important to talk about feelings, about

experiences, about the world, about how everything is arranged, on the other hand, they may not be ready to be the first to do it, and here it is your turn, you should be the first to talk about your fears, about your . doubts, about your hesitations and feelings, and this will not only create a good relationship between you and the child, will not only allow the child to open up to you in the future, but will also help you to get support, to get help, to feel needed and loved in your own family. we've created a resource where you can report any crime against a child. in any city, at any time, just stop by. to the site and report, and we will launch all possible mechanisms to punish the criminal. stopcrime ua. congratulations, friends,

the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the main events of the week, the main trends, the main opinions of our experts. we are starting today's conversation with serhiy rakhmanin, people's deputy of ukraine, member of the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on national security, defense and intelligence, he is in our studio, congratulations, mr. serhiy, congratulations, let's go let's start with the topic of transition, because now many people are discussing, in almost every platform, saying: "look, we need to create conditions for negotiations with the russian federation. we need to create certain conditions, someone says that the conditions should be created by force, as there boris johnson, someone... says that you need to talk to putin and find out about his interests, like viktor orban, but we also see this narrative in ukrainian society, when people say, oh, we don't have the strength anymore, we need to talk, and that's it i'm curious how realistic is the very attitude to negotiations in a situation where russia does not look like a country that seriously wants

some real negotiations, not conditions for surrender, which it has been putting forward since february 2022, but real negotiations. well, the thing is that talks are being talked about as much as the war is going on, just now, why weren't these conversations now, let's say, of a higher degree and wider circles, wider, well, let's say. but they will discuss it on different platforms, because it is the same fatigue from the war, which has been discussed for a very long time talked about, it has actually accumulated, it has accumulated in everyone, in the military, in civilians, in ukraine, in russia, in the west, and always, when the degree of this fatigue has increased significantly enough, even sociological surveys show that the number of people who are already in one way or another, to one or another degree ready for these paranoia, the percentage of these people increased, of course. that conversations on this topic are heard more and more often, but are

they possible, or is there a foundation for them? i don't see this foundation yet, because currently we have that we have two ultimatums, well, let's call things by their names, one ultimatum is called zelensky's peace formula, with all due respect to what is stated there, it is not a peace formula, it is an ultimatum, another peace formula or putin's peace proposals, this is the same ultimatum, but with a different sign. it is clear that it will be extremely difficult to find points of contact, accordingly, i still do not see the basis of the foundation in order to create any conditions, prerequisites in order to agree on something, well, the question is that ukraine can change its the conditions on which negotiations can begin, because it may be chained to the wall, so to speak, by reality, let's say there is a decrease in western aid or in ... the fatigue of the society from the war that you talked about, but russia, why should it give up the idea that it must

control the occupied territories, that it must obtain neutral status for ukraine, it will not refuse, that is the problem, in fact, today there may be a basis for an agreement on ending the war, on some kind of freezing of the conflict for some time the term is defined or determined, but for the sake of peace, i don't think that there is such a basis and... it will appear in the near future, just now the situation is complicated by the fact that europe is divided, the states are confused and the last elections in europe and the upcoming elections in in the united states, they force all those , depending on the fact that in one way or another the influence on the course of events depends on the course of events, because this war depends not only on the military who are fighting, although it is clear that first of all on them, they are trying to find some points of contact, some basis for that agree at least on a ceasefire. on one or another terms, it is clear that ukraine will not make territorial

concessions under any circumstances, it is clear that putin will not, under any circumstances, be perceived as his defeat by anyone, at least somehow, the only problem is that i think putin is actually ready to fight long enough, i don't know what's on his mind, i think that very few people actually know what's on his mind, maybe only he knows, maybe he doesn't, but the thing is in those... to support a military conflict at the level at which it is happening now, russia is capable, and this, i think, is a completely objective assessment, for another couple or three years, at least, on the one hand, on the other hand, the economy, which really feels a certain elevation due to the transition to military rails, it overheats, and this can lead to negative consequences in the future, moreover, the russian army is also getting tired, despite the fact that it has much more financial resources, technical resources, there too getting tired, there

they are also bleeding, they are suffering huge losses, and on the one hand , the military tells him that it will be a year and a half at the most and we can achieve a complete military victory, and on the other hand, they tell him that in two years you may have problems with the economy, and in you may have a problem with the mobilization resource and the effectiveness of your armed forces, even numerical ones, there may be a problem in a year and a half, and these are mutually exclusive. the truth is absolutely yes, and therefore, on the one hand, he is trying to improve his conditions for theoretical negotiations now, trying to put pressure on different directions of the theater of war, and on the other hand, if he has it, and he will believe in it, that he will be able to get a complete victory or a great victory by military means, without resorting to any concessions, then he will put pressure on it, and what is not a victory, a complete capture of ukraine? a complete victory in my understanding, it is for russia, it is a controlled

ukraine, it is not necessarily a physical seizure of the entire territory. it is an influence on the government, it is an influence on the authorities, it is an influence on the political processes here, this is a fixed neutral status, this is a reduction of the armed forces, that is, this is a situation in which moscow does not influence kyiv, indirectly or directly, but completely. in one or another format, in one or another form. but in any case, even if you imagine what peace is and there are some peaceful conditions, such are the enemies in ukraine, there, well, relatively speaking, a neutral status. as you say, refusal to join nato, even de facto recognition of the occupied territories as russian, even without a legal decision, which looks incredible today, which looks unbelievable today, but still, elections are taking place even in such a country, and how can russia control the elections, it has already tried to control the ukrainian elections several times and what came out of it is true, but if we talk about his goal, about his

aspirations, and not about the realities of life, i believe that today the situation in which russia will control ukraine. it is almost a fantasy, and there can be very unfavorable scenarios, but to imagine a situation where ukraine returns to the orbit of russia and becomes, relatively speaking, there a second belarus, i can’t imagine such a thing, even under the worst scenarios, well, then the question arises, even under the condition of significant territorial losses there, significant territorial losses, this is a kind of capture in the east and in the south, relatively speaking, but as far as i understand, that putin is not interested in scraps of territory, of course, no, but i say once again, he is under the influence of the military, who convince him that now the pendulum has swung the other way, and under the conditions of such intensity of the conflict, under such conditions as today there is, and theoretically also

under the condition of a decrease in military and financial aid from the west, one and a half or two. years and russia will in principle be able to inflict a military defeat on ukraine and then dictate any conditions, that's what he believes, as far as i understand. i say once again, i don't know what's in his head, but from the fact that from the information that is available, judging by everything, he came to exactly this conclusion, and that's why he absolutely does not need to conduct any realistic negotiations now, which are being talked about in kyiv absolutely, absolutely, i think i will say it again, there is no basis for peace negotiations in general, there are theoretical... prerequisites for an agreement on a ceasefire, and because ukraine, the ukrainian armed forces are tired, and because the russian armed forces are tired of russia, although no one will ever admit it out loud, but it is also true, because despite on a sufficiently large, i say once again, not a sufficiently large resource of technical, material, military support,

despite a much wider and larger mobilization resource, the russian troops . love, it is difficult enough for them, that is , motivated, qualified fighters and they have fewer and fewer commanders, that is , the tactical victories that they have won recently, they are given at a very high price, well, but then the question arises, what is the point of moscow wishing for some kind of truce in this situation, if putin believes in victory through a year and a half, what does the suspension of hostilities give him? i think that the talks about negotiations that are coming from russia, they are in... in principle, they serve two purposes. the first is, ah, let's say it's attention-grabbing, it's a certain pass to trump, on the one hand, and on the other hand, it's a preemption game in case after all, the situation, again, the pendulum will swing in the other direction, it is more profitable for him now,

when he has an advantage, when he is dictating from a position of strength, he thinks that now hinting at negotiations on... is much better than when the situation can change, theoretically it can change, it is very difficult, but also a lot of smart people, experienced, well, there, starting with radakin and kavoli, they say that a war of attrition, even when disproportionate, supposedly rivals fight among themselves, it can carry a lot surprises, a lot of different twists, for both sides, especially since the statistics show earlier, the one who is physically... territorially, militarily, more, he usually won the wars, but if we take the wars of the last two centuries, then more than half of the wars were won by the small ones over the big ones, because the situation is not linear now and the wars have changed a little, this does not mean that this is, let's say, a certain trend, but there is such a trend, but why are the countries

of the global south, first of all, china , trying intervene in this process, they would you really like to strike a truce? to be safe in the war, or is it just to strengthen their role? i think that on the one hand they want to support the status of a great power, on the other hand, i think that the same china, it wants to control the process to a certain extent, that is, china, as far as i understand, comes from the fact that if god forbid or god forbid , i don't know what their dominant view is, it 's going to come down to some negotiating rails, he has to control that process, because china is actually interested in keeping this war going. he is not interested in being russia lost, i don't think he is completely sure and wants russia to win, but he wants this war to continue because russia's dependence on china... the time of this war is only increasing and it is to china's advantage if russia loses, china is weaker, if russia wins, russia becomes a more powerful player

in china, this is also unprofitable, but now, when russia is spending its forces, including its military and financial forces, it is beneficial for china, and therefore it wants to be in touch with of this process to adjust it, if now they say that there, for example, the west, first of all, the states are trying to control the escalation, then china, for its part, also wants to control this escalation. well, it is clear that the status of a great power, it prompts, it forces cathay to the fact that it must have a peace plan, it must be at the center of this process, and by the way, there is still such a moment of truce, but can't there be the motive in which the interests of the west and russia coincide equally, if you will, unexpectedly, this is the moment of the reset of the ukrainian government, that is , russia may think that the truce, which will lead to before the elections in ukraine, yes... the opportunity to elect an administration that is more ready for some disappointing compromises, well, not the party of war, because for it, zelensky is the party of war, and the west may believe that after 5 years

there is also a certain exhaustion of power, the loss of partial legitimacy is not so much as the trust of the population, and the new government will be able to continue this conflict situation with greater opportunities, and therefore it is necessary to cease fire in order to allow the electoral process to take place. such the motive can exist for the next there, let's say months? well, let's face it, first of all, i don't really understand, honestly, what the point of view of collective action is now, because the intention of the court, the position of the european union does not always coincide with the position of the united states, on the one hand, and on the other hand, within the european union there are at least three or four different views on how this war should end, what should be supported, and exactly what, exactly how and when exactly the european union should do. and these disputes continue. further, now there is a certain reset within the eu, and strengthening and extreme right, extreme left, and both,

they are fundamental enemies among themselves, but they are united from the point of view of unwillingness to help ukraine. orban's activism is not so much related to the fact that he is the way he is, but also to the fact that he feels it very clearly, as an experienced politician, no matter how someone treats orban. on the other hand, it is not clear what the position of the united states will be. i don't know who 's going to win the presidential race, but what trump's position is going to be, and by the way, what harris' position is going to be, nobody really knows because they completely different, but from the point of view of people who know both of them, they say that they have one thing in common, they are not predictable, both, garis too, garis too, in particular in matters of foreign policy, which is not very close to her. and in which, and therefore, to imagine that now in the coming months, if we are talking about months, they agreed on some kind of joint pressure on ukraine in order to

cease fire, cancel martial law, hold elections, reset the government, i it's hard to imagine, firstly, and secondly, well i think, okay, i don't really imagine the election, but even if it happened and what will change, well , i don't think that anything will change, i say, how can they look at it eh... from the outside, i don't think that they are so naive, the fact that they do not fully understand ukraine, russia, the ukrainian-russian war and our domestic problems, unfortunately, we have seen this many times, but i do not think that they are so naive that they think, something can fundamentally to change, there are indeed a certain number of politicians, there are certain circles, there are certain countries, even, which for some reason have this fetish of restarting power, democratic elections, although i can't imagine how it can be conducted. elections in conditions of war, for them it is fundamental, but in conditions of an armistice, it is certainly possible to hold democratic elections, well , in conditions of an armistice, under the condition that, if it is

an armistice, russia will be observed, and i am very much in favor of this i have little faith, in your opinion, in general, the united states of the russian federation maintains any contacts between themselves that would allow us to talk about control escalation, this is a strange story with the call of andrii bilousov lloyd austin, are they talking about some ukrainian special operation? not even in a special operation, in the fact that the defense ministers of ukraine, russia, and the united states can confidentially discuss such confidential things among themselves. well, i can neither confirm nor deny this information, because i don't know if it's rumor, fable, gossip, or if it's a real fact, that the united states and the russian federation are in contact, well, it was recognized by officials in washington too , and moscow, and it would be strange if they didn't do it, well at least given the fact that the two most powerful... nuclear countries, well, forced, if they do not treat each other, no matter what the official rhetoric, they should maintain relations, at least working, at least in some issues. regarding

escalation control, i think that both the united states and russia are trying to control escalation, but they are not doing it jointly, but each one separately, each of them has its own set of mechanisms, tools, how to do it, and, accordingly, what they coordinate their actions, well, it's hard for me to imagine, how to fight in general this fatigue from the war that exists in public opinion, even not only in ukraine, but also in the west, we saw it, by the way, from the attacks on the ahmadiyya women, which... caused a special resonance of the world community in the media, although, as as a rule, such events appear on the front pages, in the first minutes after they happen, look at this story in the gas sector, there is the shelling of the school, the level of consequences is much lower, but the attention is much more, it depends, well, on my view, i don't know if there is some universal answer, some

universal recipe i... think that is correct, a flexibly constructed information policy, this information policy is schematic, but it was built and was effective at the beginning of a full-scale invasion, and then it follows a certain inertia in us, and today the level , the quality, format of this information policy, with regard to the internal audience, with regard, especially to the external audience, it does not withstand criticism, it did not change, and that's just... about this national information policy, which could understandably, with the support of diplomats, with the support of politicians, first of all leading ones, influence the attitude to the ukrainian war, to ukraine, this information policy was not published properly . well, and one more point, this, well, unfortunately, i will not say anything new, in order to change the attitude towards ukraine, in order for this fatigue

to stop. for it to weaken, for it to shrink, victories are needed, it is extremely difficult to win them now, provided that these victories appear, as was the case, for example, in the fall of 22, then both inside the country and it will be much easier to convince the world that ukraine can win, because now this despair that ukraine can win has actually returned to the state of february and march. in the 22nd year, when practically no one believed in it, that is, in fact, it is not fatigue from war, fatigue from the static nature of war, you can say that, you can also say that, but also fatigue from war, because the static nature of war is, well let's say, victory or defeat, it's , well, it's a subversive in military parlance, because in reality, and when war becomes routine, it becomes routine in

cities, it becomes our routine. newspapers, it is very difficult to arouse any emotions, empathy is dulled, and this also applies to ukrainian citizens, unfortunately, but this is a fact, and this would happen in any other country under similar circumstances, and it is clear that if you sit 1,000 km from here, it is very difficult for you to move something, especially after everything that could be moved has already happened, but the supply of the latest western weapons can ... the situation in the direction of some advantages of the ukrainian army, , but about the newest one western weapons, if we are really talking about the latest ones, at the moment we are not talking about any extremely new models, nor about their sufficient number, in fact, in this sense , a certain escalation control is taking place, partly due to objective reasons, well, let's say, insufficient

the amount of those... means that ukraine needs in the warehouses of even the united states, but often it is determined by subjective factors, subjective factors, because for some reason there are still these conditional red lines drawn in cities, for which it is impossible to transition, there is always a risk of this specter of the third world war, a nuclear catastrophe putin is playing with, and he has a whole set of factors with which he is trying to escalate... including, of course , this blackmail, so about some extremely new, well, why go far, if we are not allowed to hit with long-range weapons where we need, and this actually applies not only to the territory of russia, but, sorry, sometimes also to the territory of occupied ukraine, we have to match almost every target with that...