students for the reconstruction of buildings destroyed by the russians themselves, as well as the provision of soldiers of the so-called svo. we, for our part , support each serviceman, take them constant humanitarian aid, help them. there is no suspicion of this sell-out yet, but i hope that soon they will give help to kyril himself to steal from ukrainian prisons. and this is another traitor from melitopol who manages a youth organization in occupied berdan. "i see berdyansk as a developing city in which young people will respond to all requests of our population in the same way, because they are always happy to take part in the improvement of our city. as we found out a long time ago, the occupiers often put losers in leadership positions, those who can be easily controlled, who did not build their careers during the peaceful life in ukraine, and who are ready to sell with telbukhs in order to increase their social

status . all this fits perfectly with the post of this collaborator, 33-year-old oleksandr gaponov. until february 24, 2022, nothing was known about him. its treacherous the nature manifested itself during the occupation of the city, when gaponov established cooperation with the occupiers. at first, he became a candidate for the so-called youth parliament of melitopol, but failed. later, due to a lack of personnel for other teams. from the occupied territories, the russians transported gaponov to berdyansk and made him a student of the fake azov state pedagogical university, all this in order to later make him the head of the local branch of the russian movement south of youth, an organization governed by putin's united russia party. the youth of berdyansk responded to the help in unloading the humanitarian cargo, we are always happy, we always have a great attitude to such initiatives, always... in his leadership position

, gaponov promotes kremlin propaganda to the young generation, for this he specially brings russian politicians, bloggers and pop stars from the bolotyan capital. also , this traitor is the winner of the competition from rosmolodyozh, where he presented his project volunteer school of the heart of donbass. as we can see from the name, the project has a russian military bias. we, in turn, will provide you with any opportunities for implementation. himself in youth politics. currently, gaponov helps the occupiers recruit children into russian youth institutions, actively campaigns for the russian measure, promotes russian culture, and agitates local teenagers and their parents to go over to the side of the occupiers. we advise gaponov to shine more often in the russian sleazy media, so that our law enforcement agencies have more grounds for announcing suspicions against him, and judges - a verdict. this traitor first assumed the position of rector of ... one promoted in

the occupied territory, and later became the head of putin's organization at the same university. behind me is the flag of victory, this symbol has been traveling with me for many years. it hung on the building of the regiment of the ministry of internal affairs of the donetsk people's republic, like a battle flag, today it is here. this is chuikov andriy yuriyovych, born in 1979, from the city of lysychansk. previously, in his peaceful life, he was a police lieutenant colonel and a senior lecturer at kharkiv university. affairs is known for the fact that in the 14th year he spoke at a rally of pro-russian activists and defiantly resigned, explaining that he could not to put up with the use of elite ukrainian special forces against supposedly peaceful residents of kharkiv who wanted to seize the oda. i am lieutenant colonel of the militia chuykov andriy yuriyovych. 18 years of service in internal affairs bodies. i ask that i be dismissed from the internal affairs bodies until constitutional order is established in the country. when

a full-scale war broke out in the country, lyubov chuikova's love for russian rubles and the ghostly prospects promised by the occupiers flared up even more. he moved to captured melitopol, as ours found out law enforcement agencies took an active part in the information war of the russian federation against ukraine, spread the narratives of russian propaganda and denied the armed aggression of the russian federation, also called on the employees of the law enforcement agencies of ukraine and the course'. ukrainian higher authorities to stop resisting the actions of the occupiers, lay down their arms and go to kyiv. after such fruitful work against the invaders, in may 2022 , the rashists installed this traitor in the chair of the rector of the so-called melitopol state university, which was created on the basis of captured ukrainian higher all our students will receive russian diplomas this year, clearly, all our applicants can enter the melitopol state university. close to students. chuikov instilled in

young people a positive attitude towards the occupation, illegal authorities and occupying troops, and soon decided to train students for further service in the russian army. based on russia'. the occupiers opened a branch of a propaganda military youth organization at the university, it is there that young people are taught to hold weapons, shoot, fight, attack and eventually die. russian criminals made chuikov the head of this branch of putin's youth army. dear cadets of the alpha squad. today we have another great stage of installation of our unit. we have acquired official status. in april last year, ours. the security authorities announced a sensitive suspicion. now his case is being considered by the zaporizhzhia communarsky district court. i hope that soon the seller will be detained and he will eventually join another organization of a detachment of collaborators who ended up in prison for treason against ukraine. it was a program of collaborators and

i am olena kononenko. if you want to tell us about the kremlin progenitors, write to this e-mail address or simply on facebook. let's send all the traitors together. in pursuit of the russian ship. see you in a week on espresso. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers. on the air of the espresso tv channel, the west studio program. we will analyze the most important events of this week. in particular, we will talk about extremely important international negotiations that took place. different diplomatic tables, at the same time we will talk about a new concept wars and announced new doctrinal approaches. our guests today are roman bezsmertny and glen grant. our first guest is retired british army colonel and renowned

military expert glen grant. glory to ukraine, dear mr. colonel, gat save the king. glory to the heroes, god, protect the king, thank you. extremely. lively speech london speech of ambassador general valery zaluzhny. so we understand that he outlined the strategic perspective and very clearly indicated what things we should change and what we should prepare for west. he called the russian aggression against ukraine in the current phase a war of transition . i would like to ask you now to analyze the most important messages that general zaluz gave. and how they were read in the west, particularly in london. it is important that people understand that this speech was of great importance because it was delivered at the royal joint institute for defense studies, which is the british government's

defense think tank. this institute plays a similar role in the uk as the rent corporation for the american government and the pentagon. the talk was important and the hall was completely filled. numerous high-ranking officials from the ministry of foreign affairs and the ministry of defense were present, as such speeches are quite rare. therefore, since this was his first such speech and since it took place immediately after his arrival, what he said will be received with great attention. what he said, first of all, he outlined the challenges of war at this time. then he touched. themes of transition, emphasizing that although today's war is similar in many ways to world war ii and world war i, modern tools such as drones and electronic warfare are changing the way we wage war, how we directly fight on

the battlefield. the very essence of war does not change, people still die and will die, and there will always be a bloody battle between the warring parties, but the general... the nature of how war will be fought is changing. now the significance of this will be whether people believe it, that's the first thing, whether people actually believe it, even though it says the former head of the defense department: there are many people in the west who still think that the way the west conducts military operations now will remain the same in the future. in other words, the use of tanks, the use of armored vehicles and other uses. pilots, but not like now and not in such numbers as now in ukraine, because people will see that there will be much more aviation, helicopter gunships and artillery from the west than there can be from ukraine, this will change the balance in the direction how the west would like to fight, but this is a big but,

if the lunatic is right, and i suspect he is largely right, maybe not 100%, but even if he is only 60% right... that still means that most western armies are very, very, very far behind in in their processes of change and in their understanding of how they think war should be fought. it. has serious implications for military training and personnel selection. for example, great britain does not select it specialists for battalions, while, as in ukraine, each battalion is looking for its own it specialist, its engineer, who will control drones and other technologies. we don't do that in the uk, and what i'm wondering is, after this conference, are people going to go and say, we need to change our thinking, or are they going to go and say, no, he doesn't understand how strong we are and how we're going to to fight i agree with you, this is an extremely

serious challenge. on the other hand, i do not want to draw parallels with events that happened 100 years ago. so we understand that we are talking about the so -called little entente, and we are talking about the polish-bolshevik-ukrainian war, so 1920. this is how we understand what poland also wanted to get 100 years ago. more help, so unfortunately, a lot of things turn out to be incomplete, unrealized, and accordingly we need to understand, yes, whether the story about a powerful military, central european power will be supported by the appropriate amount of resources, i.e. not only by these or other political statements, and specific military resources, yes, if we fight the war until we win, that is, no... given what will happen in the united states, will it come trump, will geris come, kamela and so on, we

have to understand different scenarios, war is also about resources, human resources are currently being processed by the personnel department of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, yes, this is when we talk about mobilization, but a long, long war , which would work to the full depth of the enemy's strategic defense, it requires very... very clear coordination, it cannot be that we were promised and not given. there are many points in your theses, i think if the history of the last two years has taught us anything, it is that that we will not receive all that we are promised. and i am sure that it will continue to be so. the promises will often be greater than what is actually done, but let me dwell on one point: the f-16. everyone is talking about delays. 16. these delays arise exclusively from the ukrainian side, and not from the west. the problem is the lack of

pilots who know english to conduct training. there is also a shortage of technical staff and engineers who could acquire the necessary skills. i know from my own experience what the armed forces have engineers who did not get into the program and that is because the personnel system in the defense forces is not working. not only does it not work, it is broken, despite the effort. of the ministry of defense to change the situation, the general staff itself has not changed its approach to working with personnel, this can be seen from the work of the shopping center. let's consider these questions separately. ukraine will not get all the equipment it wants, some will arrive, but much more slowly than expected. this means that the general staff has to start planning in advance what exactly will not arrive and why, as well as how we can cope on our own. the biggest problem, in my opinion, is the front, right on the line. we are losing men, there are retreats, it is because the units are not properly equipped,

there is no doubt about it, they do not have everything they need, i understand that there is a shortage of 155mm ammunition, no one could have expected that there would be such a great need for them, no one in the world expected this, this is a problem that needs to be solved, but we knew that soldiers on the front lines needed drones, armor plates for body armor, new boots, food, there are hundreds of essentials that they are not getting properly and yet they still have to fill out a huge amount of casualty papers and the battalions do it, so we are wasting the time of the front line officers who should be spending time with by their soldiers, fighting, they actually waste time filling out papers, soldiers waste time digging trenches that should have been ready, because money was already spent on their... digging, it's all because the system doesn't work

properly, that is, the system does not anticipate these problems. why? it's very simple: the general staff deals directly with the introduction of battles, instead of planning for tomorrow. the war should be conducted by the joint staff, not the general staff. this is the job of the joint staff, to be responsible for the battles directly, not the chief of the general staff, who runs around the brigades and helps them. to the general. headquarters, which spends its time on today's concerns. so there's a big problem area here that you talked about at the beginning: all these systemic problems are needed to decide if we want to move in the... forward, because we're not going to get all the equipment we need, so how prepared are we to provide mortar ammunition, mortars, grenades, anti-tank ammunition and anti-aircraft ammunition. not all of these things will come from the international community, we have to find ways to produce them ourselves, that requires careful planning and organization, and i don't

see that happening the way it should. we waste too much time. to think about the big f-16, naval projects drones, attacks on the kerch bridge, and not enough attention is paid to ensuring that every soldier of ours is alive and properly equipped to fight tomorrow, this war will not be lost at sea or in the rear, it will be lost on the front lines when soldiers die and resources will run out. we simply cannot deal with the mass of soldiers coming at us from one place or another. we are doing well at the moment, but how long we can maintain this level of performance depends on whether they will soldiers on the front lines are properly trained, equipped and commanded by the best officers. i took a lot from what you said at the beginning, but we are in a transition period. i suppose you might

want to know my thoughts on syrsky's recent article, but we still have a long way to go. and most of these tasks require careful planning, in some cases even legislative changes. planning is very important, but there is also such a concept as the general concept of war, and you are very good to mention colonel general the syrian commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, and he very clearly warned about the enemy's plans, he decided not to talk about ukraine's plans in public. so we understand that what... you said and even more should be done, but there is also the question of what the enemy is preparing, and syrsky gave very specific numbers, yes 690 thousand offensive contingent, i.e. an increase of 150 to 170 to be, perhaps, the least. yes, from a public relations point of view, it was probably an effective interview, but me and me

sure, and many others are concerned about the question of what specific actions are behind these words, obviously. that russia will continue to send people to fight as it has done before, there is no sign that they are running out of men, or that they are having trouble recruiting new ones, since most of the new recruits die, russia does not need to pay them. society in russia has not yet fully realized the scale of what is happening. perhaps there may be some changes every month, but for now russia is focused on the long term the war putin is negotiating with china. north korea and iran to ensure the supply of weapons. they're trying to rebuild their own defense industry, but it's not as effective as it could be because they've already taken many of their best people and sent them to the front, effectively ruining some of their plans. but i don't think it's worth paying much attention to. i

think we should focus on what is happening on our side. if. says he has a plan, the question is, what is that plan, if his plan is to continue to fight as we have been fighting, a small soviet army against a large soviet army, we will not win, because we cannot cope with the numerical superiority of the enemy, the number of equipment and people will always be on their side, and this requires a change in approaches to the conduct of war. if we plan to change the tactics and strategic approach today or... tomorrow, we must teach people to fight in a different way today. this means that our best officers must be trained in new ways of waging war, the best, and us we need to find more officers who can implement these new approaches because fighting the same way, i would call it the syrsky way, just pushing people

forward and telling them to stay there and die, is not a winning tactic. a winning strategy it will not allow us to win we will continue to lose people killing soldiers on that side ok we are killing 1200 a day has it made a difference a year and a half ago we were killing thousands a day has it made a difference the answer is no we still are in the same situation, but we ourselves are now weakened because we're losing people, so i 'm back to planning again, we need to plan and change. tactics so that syrskyi's words turned into reality. this will not happen without fundamental changes in the system. a new doctrine, new prescribed methods, elimination of senseless bureaucrats everywhere. better training of personnel, all this must happen, then we will be able to win, because we will be better than them, dear colonel grant, look, well, the plans of the enemy plus or minus

have been clarified and become clear, so that now the enemy will be pulling additional manpower and will try to achieve very specific results during the end of the summer campaign at the beginning of the spring campaign, the second point ... will be the destruction of our power structure, that is , they have already gone for it, and we understand that while they will be put additional air defense systems, our population will experience additional suffering. the enemy is also counting on this, hoping that there will be an intra-ukrainian scenario. i hope that it will be possible to contain the situation, but the enemy counting on it. and the third point, yes, is the uncertainty associated with the american election. campaign, if we talk about russian plans, how do you see them? let me return to your first thesis, that russia is betting that

energy issues can divide ukrainian society. this month, when i was in ukraine for several weeks, i did not welcome any tension on this issue. on the contrary, many people treat the situation with a certain irony and joke about it. i went to a bar in kyiv, where the head waiter said. hmm on the generators so you can't order fries but everyone can get a hot dog and everyone had a laugh, it shows that ukrainians don't let their energy problems affect their spirit, so there is a certain level of acceptance that ukrainians are not will handle something as minor as electricity, be it lights or candles or whatever, and i haven't seen any major complaints or negative reactions. ah... but in the spring moods can change, that is, if it goes through the winter, the winter can be very, very difficult and strict of course, the situation may

change in winter, but there is an important point: ukrainians are a strong people, hard times did not break britain during the second world war, and i do not see that hard times will change or break ukraine now. i don't feel it and i don't hear such talk from people. i hear stubbornness and determination. people say that they are ukrainians, and such trifles cannot overcome them. this is what i heard in kyiv and sumy. last week, when i was there, maybe the situation in lviv is a little different, but this is exactly what i heard in kyiv and sumac. one way or another, let's return to the topic of russia. i don't think russia has a recruitment problem, as we imagine, it may have difficulty finding people, but the large sums of money offered for service... attract tens of thousands of russians, because the sums are too large to ignore , if they offer money for a year, two, or three jobs for one month of service, many people are ready

to join the army, so i don't think that putin is facing an acute shortage of people yet, but his real problem is in the leadership and the lack of qualified officers, many of those needed to command the troops had already died. in the first days of the war, we killed many of their generals. key commanders, now putin has to rake it out, replace them with new people, find new commanders for battalions and other units, and i suspect that many of these new battalion commanders are not capable of effectively running their units, and they are there simply because they are somebody's friends, not because they have experience or skills. such a problem is facing putin, but i think that should always be with russia. about the possible surprises, as i mentioned before, they are not predictable, they came through kharkiv, we didn't expect it, nobody seems to have expected

it, okay, and what are they going to do next, they are going to do something again that is not predictable, it's russia, can the war escalate again because of belarus, or will they decide to attack elsewhere, who knows, but they will definitely try something new, the main problem is that russia continues to build up its resources and wear us down step by step. they have more resources than we do, if they decide to move their forces elsewhere we can stop them, but every time we stop them it also prevents us from developing counterattacks and training our battalions and brigades in new methods. so we risk staying the same as we were from 2014 to 2022. just a defensive army that is in the trenches instead of being an army capable of offensive action and that is very dangerous, thank you very much dear

colonel grand for this extremely. on an important conversation on the espresso tv channel. i would like to remind our tv viewers that retired british army colonel glen grant, a well-known military expert, god save the kin, was currently working for them. glory to ukraine. money, fame. glory to ukraine and god, save the king. may he live long, may he live long. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big broadcast on the tv channel. two hours of air time, two hours of your time, my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things, two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component, serhiy zurets, what does the world live on? yuriy feder, already with me, and time to talk about what was happening outside ukraine, yuriy good evening, two hours to be aware of economic news, time to talk about money during the war, oleksandr morchavka is in time with me, and news sports, i invite yevhen pastukhov to a conversation, two hours in the company of favorite presenters. on

the weather for this weekend, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day. events of the day in two hours, big broadcast vasyl zyma, a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. new week on espresso. weekly, final informational analyst. program, a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. verdict with serhiy rudenko is now in a new

two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, as well as feedback, you can express your opinion on the bad day by phone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, from tuesday to friday from 20 to 22. now on tv. espresso will be operated by the iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat roman bezsmertny. glory to ukraine, mr. roman, i'm glad to see you. glory to heroes. good afternoon, mr. antin. visit of the minister of foreign affairs, mr. kuleba to the people's republic of china. we understand that some of it was public, some was not public. the meeting with the chinese foreign minister one lasted more than 3 hours, i think there were possibly some additional conversations. we understand that

it fits. general process, this is how the world agreed in hearing trump and the corresponding changes, trump's concept of plus minus is clear, this is how he wants to force, in one way or another, if not russia, then ukraine, he too will need a result. roman petrovich, how do you assess the current, well, i won't say that it is historical, but extremely important negotiating moment. the first thing to pay attention to is the history around. president koleba's trip to guangzhou, this is both the place, the form, and the content, because here only from the fragments of the first, second and third one can understand that no more than 10, well, a maximum of 15% of what happened there got into the information field , well, you don't need to be too prepared there to understand, for the sake of even a three-hour conversation with

the minister... you don't need to go to gondjova. first of all, what kind of city is this? this is a city where diplomats and officials of both the united states of america and great britain are present at one of the highest levels. first, i don't mean first by accident. this indicates that if there was a bilateral meeting, it would take place in beijing. this means that meetings take place far away. beyond the bilateral dialogue, now let's move on to what can be done for three days, three days, because you can spend, let's say, three meetings and to go back on this and what to count on, well, first of all, if the calculation was on a sweet candy and on the result, then mr. kuleba would not go there, but the head of the fair office would go there, and they are writing about it now.

everyone says, and it's true, that is...