and you yourself can assess how rapidly the development of prosthetics is progressing here in ukraine, and how many foreigners want to come to us to have an exchange of experience and find common solutions in this direction or in other directions of rehabilitation, of course we are developing, we are developing very quickly , there is such a concept as continuous professional development, and we use it, we also know how to analyze and make decisions, ukrainians also create new achievements in medicine, including, for example, i will tell such a short story, and about what ukrainians incredible, for example, there is such a fast protocol for determination. bleeding in trauma, and

the ukrainians analyzed two to two additional points and created a protocol that is recognized throughout the world, and this happened during a full-scale invasion, these two additional diagnostic points indicate damage to the intestine, and thus... doctor- the surgeon receives early information that it is still worth paying attention to the damaged intestine, this is during the war, so of course we are developing not only in rehabilitation, a very powerful development in the surgical direction, accordingly, rehabilitation is a consequence of surgery, and success is such a team effort. olya, you will have such a question, it will probably be the most difficult for you. what experience... did you get during

a full-scale invasion, which you would never want to have, losing loved ones, relatives, losing ukrainians, because every loss is a pain that cannot be described, it is a universe that simply falls in the family, in seven eat and in the community, in ukraine, the war takes away the best, of course i would not want this, as probably everyone ukrainians, but i want to thank you for your strength, for your steadfastness and for your work, thank you, and for agreeing to come and speak frankly about your experience. thank you,

glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on espresso tv channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular, we will talk about the use of drones as tools for organizing political murders. cops for organizing political murders, but the key topic of our conversation is the different interpretations of the so-called peaceful plans, and of course we will analyze what our enemy is preparing. today's guests of the west studio are mark fagin and daniel frith. now the legendary american diplomat, former coordinator of the united states state department on sanctions policy, a person who can be called the flesh of the espresso tv channel, will be working on the air. to the fleet of american

diplomacy, kudos to ukraine, mr. ambassador frith, glad to see you, kudos to ukraine, kudos to the heroes, so what, the key story is a huge election drama in the united states, so we we understand that there was an extremely important replacement of the main candidate from the democrats, we in ukraine sympathize with the democratic camp, of course, far from all of us and we cannot express this matter publicly, but president joseph biden allowed us to withstand the russian onslaught, the russian aggression, we appreciate it, yes, well, we just don't know what to expect from donald trump, and if we do, we don't like the story entirely, but in any case, in the united states, the front line race, activation of the enemy, so in your opinion, what do the ratings show and what will be the ukrainian policy of kemela herris. i don't know

vice president harris very well, but i do know her national security adviser, phil gordon. we have known each other for several years, judging by her speeches and what i know about phil gordon, kamal garis in the position of president will continue the support of ukraine from the us. there is no doubt about this, as vice president kamala garis met with president zelensky a few days before a full-scale invasion. she attended the munich security conference in 2022 and met him there as well. they also had... joint meetings later. i will say that this year's speech by harris at the munich security conference is worth re-reading, in my opinion, it fits into the american tradition of supporting the free world, which, as president biden said, continues from harry truman and ronald reagan.

all presidents, with the possible exception of president trump, have followed this strategy, and i'm sure she has too will take over dear mr. ambassador, frit. and you have the feeling that everything in the world is so serious that you can seriously wait for the outbreak of the third world war. as much as iran is interested in what is called the next stage of the third world war, we understand that some dictatorships, such as the russian one, do not have the opportunity to change the rules of the game in an economic way. they tried to change the rules of the world chess game with the help of weapons and aggression against ukraine. and they got bogged down in the war, and accordingly the appearance is fundamental new additional format death sites, when we talk about the middle east, it can be in the interest of those players who want to change the world decision-making system in general, and this is not about some

possible new yalta, this is generally about changing what is called post-yalta world, whether it is good or bad, but we live in it, right? and when global disturbances begin in general, this can lead to consequences similar to those experienced by european and world humanity in 1914-1918 during the first world war war i do not think that iran is capable of acquiring the status of a global player, because so far iran is within the framework of its current political system, theocracy, development. its economy will be stunted and industrial and business ties with the outside world will be limited, so iran will limit itself to being in the opposition, supplying russia with weapons and drones, and helping russia and itself avoid sanctions. iran will not become a serious global

player due to its economic limitations. you mentioned the new yalta, that is, the international one system so, the russians, the chinese, and i think the iranians too. would like to see a world in which there are spheres of dominance. russia would have its own sphere, china would have its own, iran would have its own, and countries such as ukraine would fall into the sphere of influence of one or another great power. america , in its years of wisdom, opposed such agreements. roosevelt agreed in yalta with stalin, but almost immediately regretted his action. harry truman would not agree to a soviet sphere of domination in... europe, not over poland, not anywhere, so i emphasize that the united states stands for a free and independent ukraine, capable of choosing its friends and its place in the world. russia wants, and ukrainians know this well, for ukraine to belong to russia, that is, to completely rule over

it. so, we have a clash of two worldviews. the problem with the russian view of the sphere of domination is the complete lack of stability. because russian rule over poland and ukraine would mean poverty, slavery and subjugation for these countries. the poles would not put up with it, the ukrainians would not put up with it either, and they have full reason for it right. the world of empires and spheres of influence is not a stable world, it is an unjust world, it is a non-prosperous world. the usa, starting with woodrow wilson, strives and, not without mistakes, tries to promote the idea of ​​a free world system. a system of rules, a system in which smaller countries are protected from aggression by larger ones. we simply know how it ended for the whole world when the united states did not ratify either the league of nations charter or the corresponding changes on the european continent

as a result of the american policy of isolationism. in 15 years to europe hitler came. well, now hitler in one or another of his incarnations... went much earlier, so we in ukraine are trying to stop him. mr. ambassador, frith, at the same time there are other stories about a possible second peace summit, are coming. certain plans, in particular those announced by former secretary mike pompeo and so on and so forth, that is, a certain process is underway, in the russian federation, for example, they are waiting for the most, of course, the american elections, in which trump would win, and then they would start playing in four eyes, yes vladimir vladimirovich with donald fridrichovich and so on, and we are also extremely worried about this in ukraine, this is a negotiating... moment, how do you assess it now? it's good that you mentioned mike

pompeo's plan, because you've probably come to the conclusion that there are different views within what i would call trump world. trump himself often advocates the division of the world like yalta, for the distribution of spheres of influence, where he and putin will simply agree at the expense of a country like ukraine. however, there are other personalities in trump's world who speak with... more reaganist, so to speak, politics and greater support for ukraine. michael pompeo's article in the wall street journal, in my opinion, was an attempt to influence trump's world to support ukraine and move in a more reaganite direction. there are many things in mike pompeo's article that i disagree with, and yet, let's ask ourselves, is his plan overall a useful and effective approach to ukraine? i will answer that it is quite possible. i repeat that i do not agree with everything, but this is not the point, the point is that mike

pompeo is repulsed by the support of ukraine, which makes him closer to the biden administration than he himself would like to admit. however, it suits me. in trump's world, there are debates about these issues. i think it would be very good if the representatives of the ukrainian government, the polish government and all the governments in europe would address the people in trump's world and... convince them that ukraine's business is also our business. the success of ukraine will also mean the success of the united states. so i think you've made a very good point about pompeo's plan. his article is not the only one, and yet it is much better than the proposed plan by general keith kellogg, whose starting point is a cease-fire on the current front lines, plus a us promise that ukraine will never... join nato, is certainly a much weaker position, so i think

pompeo's starting point is much better. this is just a debate, though: trump may or may not win the election, but it's good to see that in trump's world some are still advocating for, shall we say , a reaganite road map. of course, sanctions are not enough. the key story is forcing russia to sit down at the transition table and change one or the other. the parameters that they are constantly sharpening, that is, all their negotiations are reduced to their ultimatums, and this means that they are not ready, and they hope that during this winter they will cause our people just unspeakable pain and unspeakable suffering, and after that, of course, they they hope that ukraine will become more compliant, and various signals are coming, when many politicians there say, well, everything depends... on the ukrainian people, and when i hear this, i understand that this is to a certain extent

pharisaism and cunning, so this history is the history of all civilized humanity, the repulsion of russian aggression with all available possible resources, but we see that this is not completely successful, i cannot understand how to explain it, yes, because we are in ukraine now , the month of august has begun, and we are already living and trying to think about what... what awaits us this winter? i agree that the democratic free world should increase economic pressure on russia and increase military aid to ukraine by intensifying the provision of weapons and lifting restrictions on their use. on mine opinion, ukraine should be limited in the use of weapons only by the laws of war, which are mandatory for all civilized countries, but there should be no additional... restrictions other than that. we should help ukraine

and put more pressure on russia. as you said, this could change putin's negotiating calculations. now he is also waiting for the us elections. he may think that he can negotiate a better deal with trump. we can only assume, but it is possible that he is counting on this. if we increase the pressure on russia, if ukraine will continue to defend successfully. its territory and inflict heavy losses on the russians, if ukraine can continue strategic attacks on russian facilities and limit it with the help of air defense means. the impact of russian strategic attacks on the ukrainian energy system, then the situation for ukraine may improve. ukraine has never refused negotiations. at the beginning of the summer, she held a rather successful peace summit in switzerland. russia, as you say, is not interested in serious negotiations. she makes demands,

which are deliberately too categorical to be taken seriously. but everything can change. we in the free world must do what depends on us, and then we will see. i do not rule out any negotiations, but it is certainly not the americans who should tell the ukrainians what and when to do. there is mike pompeo's proposal, which we discussed with you, and there was a phrase about a five-hundred-billion loan lease for ukraine. we understand that it sounds very convincing, especially in ukraine. there are 500 billion dollars for weapons and so on and so on, but there are still the realities of the united states, right? how do you see the situation with the biden lendlease and what would the situation be, for example, with the trump lendlease or with some other lendlease. we understand that six months ago we were actually going through an extremely, extremely terrible

situation, because we did not have the resources and the money for these resources. now the situation has improved, but, but this is war. war always devours and burns money. pompeo proposed lendless, in part because trump and some in his circle have said we should lend ukraine money, not fund its defense just. now i think that supporting ukraine by giving it money for defense and giving it weapons for defense is in american interests. i support that position, but i'd also rather get a lelys loan than have no help at all, so i think that's what mike pompeo is getting at. there is an additional source of support for ukraine, it is about 300 billion dollars of frozen russian assets. many europeans oppose the transfer of these

funds, so they agreed to use them interest on this amount, which will accrue in 20 years. and that's almost $50 billion to help ukraine, and that's pretty solid, that's a really good move, i think the details are coming together right now, even though ukraine doesn't have access to the rest of that frozen finance right now, i'm sure the pressure will be gradually grow. in the end, i believe that the support of ukraine from the us and europe will be continued, as it should be, because it is him. in the interest of freedom, it is in the american interest, and i think it is in the european interest as well interests as well. plan b, in any situation there should be a plan b and a plan c. i do not believe that, for example, donald trump will become president, but i cannot rule it out, yes, we understand that our friends on the european

continent are also serious are preparing, but we understand that one france or one... germany, their willingness to support ukraine will not be enough, because this is a story not only about money, it is a story about human resources, and we would very much like to make the project that has been going on for 100 years a success therefore in 1920 put the bolsheviks literally on the brink of survival, it is about the polish-ukrainian security alliance, in simple terms, the pact between petlyura and pilsuya. yes, unfortunately, it was not brought to the end, and we understand that the fault in this is not even only one or another political elites, it was a great fatigue after the first world war, everyone wanted to end the wars as soon as possible, and the polish national -democracy also actively implemented its other plan. i

believe that polish-ukrainian friendship and alliance are of crucial importance for security. both countries and for europe as a whole. we can go back to the 17th century, when the inability of poland and the zaporizhian sich to cooperate ultimately worked in moscow's favor. poland was and is a faithful and consistent friend of ukraine. the poles are persistently pushing the american government and the biden administration to provide aid to ukraine. they do this both publicly and privately. special ambassador of poland. in ukraine, pavel koval is a longtime supporter of polish-ukrainian friendship, he has been friends with ukraine for many, many years, and there are many such poles across the political spectrum. there are historical issues between poland and ukraine, but you are absolutely right that pilsutski and petliura understood the need for close cooperation between poland and

ukraine. this need remains relevant to this day, not only in the name of our own national interests, but also in the interests of european security and the entire free world. that is why i think that this tradition should be remembered and followed. last question, dear mr. ambassador, you generally see the light at the end tunnel, as they say in ukraine. how this war will end is unknown, but there is a well-founded prospect of relative success for ukraine. if ukraine can hold its territory, limit russian gains to a minimum, and achieve very high losses for russia, this will indicate the potential for success. if ukraine can continue and intensify its strategic attacks on russian military targets, and if it can limit the effectiveness of russian

strategic attacks on ukrainian targets, this will also indicate the potential for success. ukraine manages to practice successful attacks, especially on russian facilities in crimea. if she can maintain this momentum and if the event gives her the support she needs, there is. reasonable prospect that russia will not be able to continue its war in ukraine. poland's foreign minister said that in two years, russia's potential may decrease, although this is a long time and not an easy prospect, but it is still a potential outcome. are you asking about the light at the end of the tunnel? yes, the road to it is not easy, but it is there. are there other options? yes, there is. we are on the west, the united states and europe, have the opportunity to influence the outcome if we do our job and support ukraine as much as possible. if we put pressure on russia and give ukraine

the weapons it needs, it could make putin either unwilling or unable to continue the war. it is not for me, as an american, to dictate what ukraine should do, instead, it is ukrainians who will have to make these decisions. by the way, i think that... the future of ukraine should be in nato, so as not to give it to russia agree on a ceasefire, and then regroup your troops and attack ukraine again. it is quite possible that ukraine will emerge from this war as a free, independent country, a part of greater europe and a member of nato. could russia be defeated in its attempt to conquer ukraine, which could have a profound and beneficial effect on russia itself? so you asked... is there light at the end of the tunnel, i answer: yes, but there is a thorny road ahead, the tunnel is long and difficult, and you, without any experts

, know this, but i see a reasonable prospect regarding success: thank you very much, mr. ambassador frith, for this extremely important conversation for all of us, i would like to remind our tv viewers that ambassador frith, ex-coordinator of the state, was currently working on the espress air. united states secretary of state for sanctions policy, iconic american diplomat. there are discounts until independence day on decatel, 15% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. fm galicia. listen to yours. there are discounts until independence day at

eden. 25% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. there are discounts until independence day on linex forte 15% at podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. serhii zgurets. but how does the world live? yuri fizer is already in front of me and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money under time of war who, along with me and sports news , invite yevhen pastukhov to a conversation for two hours in the company of our favorite cultural news anchors, our tv viewer is ready to say good evening to anchors who

have become many. on the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day. the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for the intelligent and those who care. espresso in the evening. new week on espresso. weekly, final, information and analytical program. a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. every week, the saturday political club helps to understand

the process. this is what is happening in ukraine and the world. vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts. based on the facts, they give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. if you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday political club, every saturday on espresso. the tv channel is now on the air. will work mark fegin, a figure of the russian opposition, not emigrating, a well-known video blogger, ex-detat of the state duma. glory to ukraine. mark, nice to see you. glory to the heroes, i am happy to welcome all the viewers. congratulations anton. attempt on ilya ponomarev. so we understand that the enemy used shakhet this time. well, accordingly, this immediately raises many questions, and perhaps hints at many answers when we talk about so-called strange arrivals, yes. and this, of course, can apply not only

to the present. the situation, in the near future, well, but in any case, in the kremlin, they made a note of water and do not say anything about it. as for the attempt on ilya penomerev, it was completely predicted, among the people whom the kremlin would like to destroy, and the help of russian emigrants, oppositionists, ilya ponomarov occupies an honorable place, and he is not the only one, there are several others, and there is operational information, which is provided by the services that provide the project, which i am actively looking for... ways to destroy some effective part of the russian opposition abroad, in relation to a certain number of people, this is known, it is not a secret, especially since there are drones in the house of ilya ponomarov in the kyiv region have already arrived it is difficult for me to say something about the technical side, perhaps the kyiv region is more difficult to cover with air defense means. kyiv itself - yes, but to prevent attacks on the kyiv region, the means may not be enough, and the danger is higher there, but ponomerev's address is not

was a secret, they had already flown there. drones, shahedy or gran-2, as they are called there, so this is not news, there is something else: he came, as far as i understand, to kyiv, spent the night at home, they could have informed some agency that he was in the house, i know that he was in america, and the drone is sent when they want to kill a specific person, and not destroy a building. so, they are receiving some operative information from some agency, maybe in kyiv, ilya ponomaryev is writing to me just now, so i think, most likely, they will... in the future, where possible, at a distance, with the help of drones, and somewhere there will be assassination attempts, some people will be sent, what is important here, it would seem, why do you want to kill him, what is his danger or others, this is a completely wrong assessment, they are not evaluated from the point of view of specific dangers arising from a political leader, they need to demonstrate to everyone that this is not what you will do, support ukraine, promote russian connections,

oppose putin as his enemies. to spread information about what moscow produces in ukraine and not only, it needs to be demonstrated, this is the main goal, there is no specific danger from an individual, just like navalny there is some kind of danger, especially when he was in prison there was no, but he had to be killed, there it was 'related to the exchange, there is still a need to demonstrate to everyone what will happen to you if you join any activity at any level against the regime in moscow. well, ukraine is an enemy, they are simply killing ukraine, and the russian opposition is the same enemies and the same targets. from this it is necessary very important conclusions to make. therefore, the defense of ukraine, as i often say among my colleagues, russian oppositionists, is the redoubt before your death. it is necessary to defend ukraine, in addition to your ideological stance against the war and against putin, also because you will be next, this is very important to understand.