opposition russian journalists who asked the american representative: how come the united states, the americans, and they are not worried, it turns out that they are not worried that the operation was agreed with our western partners, and they believe that it is absolutely fair, plus it seems to me that it is important precisely that we do not create these authorities that were created by the russians in the territories that they capture, we spoke a little on the air and mrs. larisa emphasized that it is important to observe of all international norms, the geneva conventions, when you are at war, including on foreign territory, that is, we do not touch civilians, we do not touch civilian life, and we see that we do not tolerate, as they tolerate our cities, and bahmut there, that is, our troops, troops are advancing, advancing peaceful peaceful.

residents, well, it is clear that it cannot be without losses, because it is a war, yes, because it is a war, there are simply losses that cannot be avoided, but we are not engaged in simply demolishing cities completely and not we are leaving ruins, it seems to me that the ukrainian troops are advancing cautiously, well, this is in accordance with the un charter on the protection of any right to the protection of any state in relation to which... acts of aggression, that is, what we are doing, we, this self-defense and protection of the ukrainian people, well, we will monitor these developments in kursk or in suzhi, but i hope that in kursk, and in ryysk, and in korenevo, everywhere, everywhere, where the armed forces of ukraine have reached. friends, i remind you that we are working live, and during the entire broadcast we are conducting a survey, we are asking you about yes, do you think ukrainian diplomacy is effective, yes, no, if you think this...

ukrainian diplomacy is effective, then you can also call and vote on the number 0800 211 381 no 0800 211382 all calls to these numbers are free vote at the end of the program we like here are the results of this vote. one more topic, colleagues, it arose yesterday and after the interview with the head of the office of the president of ukraine andriy dyermak. from european pravda did a long interview with yermak, and yermak in the questions and answers, it seems to me, these questions and answers, they will, in principle, probably come to the attention of the western audience first of all, because in the last six months the western press has been quite actively writing about yermak's role in zelensky's entourage, about the fact that he performs a lot of tasks from zelensky, what his powers are. much broader than the head

of the office of the president of ukraine, how yermak explains his role in international politics, and let's listen, because he compared his role to a national security adviser. i think no one will argue that the main thing the diplomat of the country is president volodymyr zelenskyi, and we can see this from the results, and therefore, of course, as the head of... the president, carrying out the president's instructions, i deal with many issues, in this sense, i work, if compared to how in other countries there are national security advisers, and that 's why i talk to colleagues from the united states, like jake salevan, jens plötner from germany, and many others. colleagues, why does yermak have

to justify that he, that he is an adviser from of national security, that he is on the president's team, that he only does what the president tells him. larisa. you know, it's interesting that we're talking about kursk, about yarmak, it's some, for me, it's just some kind of déjà vu, because putin's regime started with a fundamental question that everyone asked each other at events. fuck putin, no one understood, that is, yeltsin took him somewhere, what kind of... person, who is he, what is he, and now yermak has come out, well, in fact, he is now answering the same question, who is mr. yermak , and he found a role model for himself, i congratulate him, now it turns out that he is a sullivan, thank god, but i understand that the adviser on international affairs to the president of the united states is a position that exists, it exists, it, that is, there are clear things, there are his authority, to whom he can give orders, to whom he cannot, or can he? why is he acting as

sullivan. well, conditionally, someone like sullivan under president zelenskyi, and kuleba, but you can’t justify it with official duties, if you need an adviser on international affairs to the president, who has certain powers and the weight of the international international space, well, create this , create, squeak, you have, you can, you have both the legislative and the executive branch of power, i do not ask, but why, well, it is because a person simply performs not your powers. moreover, i understand that many people in the west are very worried about the great influence of a person, that this influence goes beyond the limits of his official duties, and this scares even a person for whom ukrainians did not vote, that is, that is, that is

, that this uncertainty scares the representatives western democracies, where democracy is primarily a procedure, and therefore they do not understand his role, he looks like some kind of favorite. under bosch some emperor, that is, under an undemocratic leader, that's the point. by the way, you mentioned putin, today is exactly 25 years since he was appointed prime minister of the russian federation, that is, the collapse of russia under putin began 25 years ago. to andriy, regarding andriy yermak, why is yermak trying to make excuses, although zelensky clearly said everything he does. publicly, what the fair does according to mine, he does according to my instructions, in fact, more than one president of ours tried to justify the head of the president's office or the head of the administration, once yushchenko said at the faction that baloga is me, well, zelensky said roughly the same thing,

so i wanted to emphasize that we have heads the administration of the president or the office of the president, they are always a little demonized, so it is basically in the ukrainian tradition. what role does yermak actually play, i think that no, not decoratively, he is really an influential person, but issues of international politics to i personally have fewer questions about him than about domestic politics, but international politics is just such a beautiful track, it's a peace summit, it's a weapon, and it just works there, i agree here with andriy borisovych that zelenskyi, volodymyr is... . the main diplomat, it is precisely his speeches that make parliaments all over the world applaud, it is precisely his charisma on television that attracts the attention of citizens of various countries, makes them donate to support the ukrainian army, he is a wonderful actor, we know his

previous profession and excellent works, beautiful he reads speeches, and the role of yermak, well... maybe, but there is a huge apparatus that prepares all these meetings, trips, and speeches, which are not written by yurmak, of course, of course, and i also have a question, well, you talked about , let's say, the bright side of yurmak, where he can promote himself and say that here i was at an international meeting and here i met with important people, but what about domestic politics, that is the most interesting thing that we have, what does he do? how they work with business, we know business complaints about the actions of the president's office, how the government is run from the president's office, that is , there are a lot of questions regarding domestic policy, well, regarding foreign policy, yermak said that

the president clearly understands which functional situations should be performed by the ministry of foreign affairs, and which should be entrusted to advisers, let's listen to this fragment. today, such traditional diplomacy, unfortunately, has its limits, today we need to achieve results without having these limits, and therefore we all work as a team of the president, and i do not see any problems with the delimitation of these powers, my powers end at ends where the president's mandate ends. that is, and the mandate of the president obviously never ends, so my powers are unlimited, so that the president does not mandate, well, obviously, here is another issue, that the ukrainian people, well, first of all, in addition to the assessment , they must draw conclusions, the conclusions are

that for many years, under almost every president, there has been an attempt to increase the powers of the president through usurpation. local authorities to one degree or another their people, local authorities, the judiciary system, this is the struggle for the expansion of the president's powers beyond the limits of his constitutional powers. it has always lasted, and for the first time in ukrainian history, the ukrainian people gave the president colossal carte blanche both in the parliamentary and local elections, and everything that is happening, everything that is going on now, is reproached that the parliament, as they say, sometimes votes, sometimes does not vote, then he went on vacation at the most inopportune moment, then the local government does not allocate budgets that way, friends, in fact, you did not elect the local government, you do not know the names of these people, you did not elect parliament, you did not know the names of these people, when you went to vote your majority for the servant of the people, you gave all the power in the country

to one person, volodymyr zelenskyi, and this is too much, even for a brutish president, seriously, that is why this conclusion, how important democracy is , how important is the distribution of power in the country of this branch of government, and it is not a question of good, bad, when there is a balance, there are distributed, there is a political process for citizens. and for the country there will be more, more profit in this, well, yes, it cannot be done in time war, five or six managers manage the country in conditions of war, because, first of all, it is not dangerous, because these five or six people can also be under the crosshairs of the russian occupiers, and andriy, in this situation, we we can talk about the next presidential campaign, because... i think that zelensky is still thinking about the next presidential term, and yaermak talked about this in one of the previous interviews, do

the presidential team now have enough arguments to to explain many things in the country, and corruption, and how some tenders are trying to be awarded at inflated prices, and about how what is happening in the ministry of defense was happening in the ministry of defense, i don't know what is actually happening there now, but we are confronted every day... from this information, and here we must give credit to our colleagues, the investigators, because if it weren't for yuriy nikolov and his investigations into these egg contracts, we would never have known that the army buys one egg there for 17 hryvnias, and that too in principle, it should be acknowledged that during the difficult, difficult situation in the country, journalists, investigators are doing their job, in your opinion, what kind of era will it be in the definition, even after the mandate

ends, let there be an election campaign, how can this period be characterized? i think that in one word it is difficult, and what's more, journalists and investigators are of course well done, they reveal cases of corruption, but there is also a reaction that is not as we would like, not everyone is sitting. but it cannot be said that these investigations are ignored, that is, we know, after the investigation into yaits in 17 was the dismissal of the minister of defense, after the investigation into prokhmedit there were, the tender was canceled, that is , there is an attempt to somehow react, at least public scandals, they cause a reaction from the authorities, but if they did not cause any reaction at all, well, then the letter is lost, then of course with such power is impossible at all. have nothing in common, here i think that there will be many supporters who will still support

zelensky for a second term, if he leaves, and corruption will not be a minus for him, because they will write off the fact that it was someone else, and we they reacted when it became known, well , when it became unknown, then it is clear that there was no reaction, but eh, will it be possible to repeat such a success as it was in the 19th year, definitely not. i think that the support will fall strongly, and if we talk about the parliamentary elections, then there will be a very colorful and interesting parliament, where there will be many, i would say not one opposition party, there will be many opposition parties to the current regime, well, at least there will be no monopolies and there won’t be a monomajority and there won’t be, and this and that are better, i agree, there won’t be without responsibility, friends, let me remind you that throughout our broadcast we spend. today we ask you about this, do you think ukrainian diplomacy is effective? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes

or no, write your comment under this video if you have your thoughts on ukrainian diplomacy, and if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381, if you consider ukrainian diplomacy effective, if you do not consider it effective, 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these rooms are: free. another topic, colleagues , is the existence of such a platform called telegram, because in march 24 mykola knyazhytskyi started talking about the need to... create conditions for regulating telegram and contacting the founders of telegram, in order to clearly understand what kind of platform it is, who owns it, how they respond to the requests of the ukrainian authorities, nikita poturaev from servant of the people said practically the same thing this week, he said that we need to understand how to keep

telegram is under control, or at least to be in contact with... with those who hold this platform, how russia uses it, the head of the parliamentary committee on freedom of speech yaroslav yurchyshyn supported the idea of ​​regulating the activities of telegram in ukraine on the air of our tv channel, let's listen to what he said yur chishin, because the reaction mechanism at the level of official authorities, and it should be up to... operationally, or the so-called media literacy, telegram is a russian network, and therefore to transfer your own private data to it is to question everyone's security, who surrounds you, and you in the first place, there are no cities in ukraine, except maybe uzhgorod, but all the same

, they flew into the transcarpathian region, into the volovets region, yes, which would not have been attacked, and at the same time. tolerate a network that most likely has relations and is clearly subordinate to the russian special services, only because it is somehow more convenient, well, in principle, this is simply a matter of a lack of desire to survive, we need to survive in the war, and in the information war, telegram, tiktok is a weapon used against us. from tiktok v the united states of america banned, as far as i remember, and due to the fact that the chinese did not want to contact the american authorities, we had our own practice with similar resources, bans, and vkontakte of classmates, this story began in 2014, and during the term president poroshenko,

these resources were banned, although i remember how the users howled. these networks, what will happen, i won’t have them in my classmates, i have all my classmates there, all my relatives from russia, i will lose them, i don’t know what i will do, but in this situation, andrei, what can you say to telegram users, and to us, because we are also active users of telegram channels where there is a war, and telegram channels now provide a lot of information about the war and what is happening in the country , about the arrivals, about how russia is attacking the... country in operational mode, can ukrainians live without a telegram, and if there is no telegram, then what can happen, how soon there will be no cinema, no theater, there will be not solid television, they can and will live without telegram, i am sure of it, because telegram is real a destructive network, now our politicians

are playing telegram, they are also creating various anonymous channels where they pour out... defamation on each other and criticize each other and try to pour some kind of internal insights into it, literally today i was told that a businessman bribed a fairly well-known telegram channel belongs to another, well , some kind of internal kitchen is going on, there is some kind of market, and this interferes a little to put telegram under control, because it is profitable for many, including in the ukrainian government, but for... those ordinary people like me who are watching this program, i advise you to open google, enter the inscription kremlingram, kremlegram, there is such a site that collects all the evidence that telegram is a russian platform that is dangerous for ukrainians, and i think that you then you will decide that

you can somehow live without telegram in your work and in your personal life. larisa, it is necessary to fight whether and whether it is necessary to fight against telegram and how to explain to our viewers and users of telegram that this network, which, which is used by the fsb, and they created there 800 or 900 telegram channels work all over the world and try to influence the information field, and the ukrainian one as well, because with the beginning of the great war there is a boom in telegram channels, well, it is impossible to exist , because people think they know everything. yes, yes, there are kremlin channels somewhere, of course, i'm a smart person, i don't read nonsense, that is, there is a certain arrogance that doesn't work, i believe that there is a method that was still used at the time. during the first, during the second world war, this, this closure, the british home office had little the right to close any publication, then these

were printed publications that acted against, in their opinion, acted against the interests of the state, and this publication had to prove through the court that it was not such, and in the 40s, when it first started war, when the war with czechoslovakia began, the germans began to occupy czechoslovakia, then... then britain, of course, as allies and france declared war on hitler, saying that we will not tolerate this, and then the british edition of the british yorker is a left-wing publication , british worker, worker, ot it came out with such a nameless article, about the fact that, they say, this is a war of imperialists, and we are generally proletarians here, drop it, so this is not good, we know, and then this edition simply started with that. in principle, the issue of working with dubious information resources during the war, and then it was closed. we see that at the moment all these platforms, their

danger is not only that they spread inaccurate information, that they are used as a means of struggle, whether commercial or political, we see the consequences, by the way, have been in britain for a week and a half, horror, simply, pogroms, and when it begins to ... understand, it is about spreading from completely unknown sources, completely false information that stirred up the whole of britain, and there they cannot, there pogroms are going on, people are just there, well, really horror is happening, which the government cannot cope with , although the government communicates perfectly, we know that telegram has other flaws, such as how it reads a book, a phone book, anyone, and even if in my book, for example, there is no and... no mr. yarmak, because i am not his wife, nor his girlfriend, nor his mother, nor his mother-in-law, but nevertheless someone, for example, for example, has

a phone policy where it says papa, that is , telegram believes, someone has it written in a book yermak, and once it was considered, and of course russia knows yermak's phone number, and someone has a dad, the same phone, and this means where this boy is, where... what school he goes to, that is , it is so dangerous, we don't even understand , that i can be seen by someone as ms. larisa, and by someone as someone's acquaintance, mother, and we each of us are in danger, because telegram, that's the problem with telegram, it's not even about information, it monitors and the russian special services build networks, they know where whose maid is, where whose neighbor is, that your child studies at school with a child, you may not even know whose father. but the child will be stolen there, i don't know, and they will start blackmailing you, influence there, well , i mean, we are all in danger, because it is a war, and saboteurs are fighting against us, and you can't

explain it to people, it's just that the state has to come in and stop it, at least at least for a period war, and instead we hear that each and every government agency has created its own telegram channel, each politician has created its own telegram channel, well, i'm probably the only one who doesn't have a telegram channel in this country, but not me, well, i do it's... it's humor like that, but we should just close it, because it's dangerous, because it's a tool not only of influence, but also of surveillance, and it facilitates subversive work when everyone is under attack. well, this should be an obvious political decision, obviously. thank you, colleagues, for the conversation, it was larisa voloshina and andrii dyanitskyi. thank you for the conversation, i would like to remind our tv viewers that throughout our broadcast we conducted surveys, friends, we asked you about this, do you think it was effective. ukrainian diplomacy, let's look at the final results, the final results of this poll, televised 16% yes, 84% no, these are

the results of a televised poll on facebook, we have a ratio of 24% who consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective and 76% no. friends, we will put an end to this, it was a verdict program, conducted by serhiy rudenko, i will say goodbye to you until tuesday, see you at 20:00, don't forget that we work on all platforms, on social networks, including we have a beautiful site that works 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, the most prompt information on the espresso tv site, read, come in, support espresso, we work for you, that's all, i wish you all good health, take care of yourself and your relatives, goodbye. oh, i remember, you see, even though they say that over

the years, our memory is getting weaker, but i am attentive and remember everything. we take the effect memo from dr. tice and feel the difference. the active substances of memo effect improve the functioning of the nervous system and contribute to the normalization of mental activity. memo effect from dr. ty improves memory and attention, helps to think. there are discounts until independence day on normoven tablets, 10% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. do you suffer from heartburn? i recommend izoto. isota interacts with the acid in the stomach, which leads to a reduction in the symptoms of pachia. sota: your water if heartburn bothers you. in the august issue, krania magazine will tell about the return from captivity. how is ukraine looking for its own? shall we bring everyone back? children kidnapped by russia? the country touches on painful topics for all ukrainians. we talk with experts, listen to the stories of soldiers who were in polonia. ask for the country at press outlets or pre-pay

online. fm. galicia listen to yours. krendol hit relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. with long-lasting cream. you can also walk. blue yellow cream for joint pain there are discounts until independence day on magne b6 10% at pharmacies plantain bam and save. now i have a toothpaste that does more. lacquer activ++ with a plus of active ingredients. i i use it to overcome problems with gums and unpleasant odor. lacquer active plus with two-phase technology, actively overcomes bleeding gums and gives fresh breath. lakalut aktiv++ - an action that you feel immediately.

national tebe on... megogo is a lot of channels, well, a lot of channels, as well as movies, cartoons, series and favorite shows, turn on megogo on different devices, without network wires and antennas, and all this from uah 49 per month, there discounts until independence day on 10% motorex pills in pharmacies, plantain, bam and savings. wow, i went for a walk, water, here ordinary water is not enough, drink reo. i'm saving myself, reo. you're ready, honey, ready, took reo. rheo - water for special medical purposes. there are discounts until independence day on citramon darnytsia 10% at podorozhnyk-bam and oskad pharmacies. greetings to our viewers. i am artem logutenko on the air with you today. and we will talk about

the formula of not being afraid. a special military operation to demilitarize the kursk region of russia. my guest today is roman pohorily, the co-founder and senior analyst of the deep state resource. and actually, roman, i want to to discuss the purpose of this operation with you. for several days now, we have been watching how our forces break through the defenses of the russians, capture new and new territories in the course. region, but we don't know anything about the goal, what do you think the goal is? well, congratulations, well, if we talk about the goals and objectives that have been set for today, then they definitely do not exist, because, first of all, our military and political leadership chose the position of silence, and this is probably the most correct position of all that was before this, there is now, and now there is...