precisely because we are not creating these authorities that were created by the russians in the territories they capture, we spoke a little on the air and mrs. larisa emphasized that it is important to observe all international norms, the geneva conventions, when you are at war, including on foreign territory , that is, we don’t touch civilians, we don’t touch civilian life, and we see that we don’t endure how... they destroy our cities, and bahmuts there, that is, our troops, the troops are advancing, advancing , peaceful, peaceful residents, well, it’s clear , that without there can be no losses, because this is a war, yes, because this is a war, there are simply losses that cannot be avoided, but we are not in the business of simply demolishing cities completely and leaving no ruins, i think very carefully ukrainian

troops are advancing, and this corresponds to the un charter on the protection of any right to the protection of any state against which aggression has been committed, that is, what we are doing, we, is self-defense and the protection of the ukrainian people, well, we will monitor this development in kursk or suzhi, but i hope that both in kursk and in rynsk and in korenevo everywhere the armed forces of ukraine reached. friends, i remind you that we are working live and... we are conducting a survey on the entire broadcast, we are asking you about whether you consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective, yes, no, if you consider this ukrainian diplomacy to be effective, then you can also call vote on the number 0800 211 381, not 0800 211-382, all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. another topic colleagues, it arose. yesterday and after the interview

with the head of the office of the president of ukraine andriy yaermak, serhiy sedorenko from european pravda conducted a long interview with yermak and yermak in questions and answers, it seems to me that these questions and answers, in principle, will probably be the first to be noticed by the western audience , because over the past six months, the western press has been quite actively writing about... yermak's role in zelenskyi's entourage, about the fact that he performs a lot of tasks from zelenskyi, that his powers are much wider than those of the head office of the president of ukraine. how yermak explains his role in international politics, and let's listen, because he compared his role to a national security adviser. i think no one will argue that the main diplomat... is precisely president volodymyr

zelenskyi, and we can see this from the results, and therefore, of course, as the head of the president's office, fulfilling the president's instructions, i deal with many issues, in this sense i work, if you compare how national security advisers work in other countries, and that's why i communicate with colleagues from in the states, for example, with jake salevan, with jens plötner from germany and with many others. colleagues, why does yermak have to justify himself, that he is a national security adviser, that he is in the president's team, that he only does what the president tells him. larisa. you know, it's interesting that we're talking about kursk, about yermak, it's some kind of, for me, it's just some kind of déjà vu, because putin's regime began with... a fundamental question that

everyone in the west asked each other: fuck, mr. putin , no one understood, that is, yeltsin took him somewhere, what kind of person is he, who is he, what is he, and now yermak has come out, well, in fact, he is now answering the same question, who is mr. yermak, and he has found a role model for himself , i congratulate him, now it turned out that he is a sullivan, well, thank god, but i understand that the adviser on international affairs of the president of the united states is a position that exists. she is, she means there are clear things, there are his powers, who he can give orders to, who he can't, can sullivan give orders to blinkin, i don’t know, most likely not, what yermak can do, he has a completely different position, well , that’s all, he is trying to explain why he performs the role of sullivan, well, conditionally the same as sullivan under president zelensky, and hesitating, but you can't justify it with official duties, if you... need an adviser on international

affairs to the president who has certain powers and weight in the international, international space, well, create this one, create it, skip it, you can , you have legislation. and the executive branch of government does not ask but why, well, it is because a person simply does not fulfill his powers, and i understand that many in the west are very worried about the great influence of a person, which this influence goes beyond the boundaries of his official duties, and this is frightening for a person for whom ukrainians did not vote, that is, this uncertainty is frightening. this is primarily a procedure, and that is why they do not understand his role, he looks like some kind of favorite under bashko of some emperor, well, that is, under an undemocratic leader, that is the point, by the way, you mentioned putin, today exactly 25

years, as he was appointed prime minister of the russian federation, that is, the collapse of russia under putin began 25 years ago. andriy, regarding andriy yermak. for which yermak is trying to justify himself, although zelensky clearly said that everything he does is public, that yermak is doing on my behalf, he is doing on my instructions. in fact, more than one president has tried to acquit the head of the president's office or the head of the administration. yushchenko once said at the faction that baloga is me, but zelensky said roughly the same thing. yes, i wanted to to emphasize that... we have the heads of the president's administration or the president's office, they are always a little demonized, so it's basically a ukrainian tradition, which role is actually played by yermamak, i think it's not decorative, he's really an influential person, but questions about

i personally have fewer questions about international politics than questions about domestic politics, but international politics is just such a beautiful track, it's a peace summit, it's a weapon and... it just works there, i agree with andriy borisovych here that zelensky, volodymyr is the chief diplomat, it is precisely his speeches that make parliaments all over the world applaud, it is precisely his charisma on television that attracts the attention of citizens of various countries, makes them donate to support the ukrainian army, he is a wonderful actor, we know his previous profession and he works great, he reads wonderful speeches, and yermak’s role, well, organizationally, maybe, but there is a huge apparatus that prepares all these meetings, trips, that is, speeches, which are not written by yurmak, of course, of course, and

i have a question, well, you talked about, let's say, the bright side of yurmak, where he can promote himself and say that here i was at an international meeting. and here i met with important people, but what about internal politics, this is the most interesting thing that in our country, what does the president's office do, how do they work with business, we know business complaints about the actions of the president's office, how the government is managed from the president's office, i.e. there are a lot of questions regarding domestic policy, well, regarding foreign policy, yarmak said that the president clearly understands what functions to destroy. situation has perform the ministry of foreign affairs, and which should be entrusted to advisers, let's listen to this fragment. today , this is traditional diplomacy, unfortunately, it has its limits, today we need to achieve

a result without having these limits, and therefore we all work as a team of the president, and i do not see any problems with the separation of these powers. my authority ends where the president's mandate ends. that is, and the mandate of the president obviously never ends, so my powers are unlimited so that the president does not mandate. well, obviously, i think i appreciate it the activities of yermak and zelenskyi will be given by voters, we can only talk about statements and analyze these statements. obviously, if zelensky clearly said that yermak will leave his post only when i leave my post, because he works exclusively for ukraine, we can rely on the president of ukraine, he is the person elected by the ukrainian people, and the ukrainian people obviously should evaluate, what

do you think, larisa, how the ukrainian people will evaluate the times of zelenskyi’s presidency, i have no doubt that there will be a negative evaluation and not therefore, and this does not apply to mr. zelensky himself. the results of his work, simply , well, firstly, there will be fatigue, and secondly, during his cadence, an increased cadence , a war took place, and this is always an effort, well, that is, it is always. after the shock experienced, it will be obvious, people will try to find who, who is guilty, who did not save, these are obvious things, here is another question that the ukrainian people, well, first of all, in addition to the assessment, they must draw conclusions, the conclusions are in the fact that for many years, under almost every president, an attempt was made in our country to increase the powers of the president at the expense of usurpation of local authorities, to one degree or another by their own people, local authorities. the judicial system, this struggle for the president to expand his powers beyond the limits

of his constitutional duties, it has always lasted, and for the first time in ukrainian history , the ukrainian people gave the president colossal carte blanche both in parliamentary and local elections, and everything that is happening, everything , who is going now, complains that, as they say , the parliament sometimes votes, sometimes does not vote, then went on vacation at the most inappropriate time the moment, the place... the local government doesn't allocate budgets like that, friends, in fact, you didn't elect the local government, you don't know the names of these people, you didn't elect the parliament, you didn't know the names of these people when you went to vote of this majority as a servant of the people, you gave all the power in the country to one person, volodymyr zelenskyi, and this is too much, even for a brutal president, seriously, that's why this conclusion, how important is democracy, how important is the distribution of power in the country. these branches of government, and it is not a question of good, bad, when there is a balance, there are distributions, there is a political process

for the citizen, and for the country there will be more, more profit of everything, well, yes, during the war, five or six managers cannot manage the country in war conditions, because it is not dangerous, first of all , because these five or six people may also be under the crosshairs of the russian occupiers, and andrii, isn't it? uh, in this situation, we can say that it is from the next presidential campaign, because i think that zelensky is still thinking about the next presidential term, yarmak said about this in one of the previous interviews, does the presidential team now have enough arguments to explain a lot of things in the country, and corruption, and how some tenders are trying to be awarded at inflated prices and about... how what is happening in the ministry of defense happened in the ministry of defense, not i know what

is really happening there now, but we are faced with this information every day, and here we must give credit to our colleagues, the investigators, because if it were not for yuriy nikolov and his investigations into these egg contracts, we would never have known what was going on there. army buys one egg there for 17 hryvnias, and this too, in principle, we must give credit that during difficult... difficult situations in the country, journalists, investigators are doing their job, in your opinion, what kind of era will this be in the definition already after the end of the term of office, let there be an election campaign, how can i characterize this period, i think that in one word it is difficult, and what's more, journalists, investigators, of course, well done. they reveal cases of corruption, but there are the reaction is not as we would like, not everyone

is sitting, but it cannot be said that these investigations are ignored, that is, we know that after the investigation about yaitsa p17 , the minister of defense was dismissed, after the investigation about ahmedyt, the tender was canceled, that is there is an attempt to somehow react, at least public scandals, they cause a reaction... but if they did not cause any reaction at all, well, then the writing disappeared, then of course it is impossible to have anything in common with such a government, here i think that there will be many supporters who support after all, zelensky for a second term, if he leaves, and corruption will not be a minus for him, because they will write off the fact that it was someone else, and we reacted when it became known, well, when it became unknown, then ... i understood that there was no reaction, but will it be possible to repeat such a success as

in the 19th year, definitely not, i think that support will fall strongly, and if we talk about the parliamentary elections, then there will be a very colorful and interesting parliament, where there will be many, i would say more than one opposition party, there will be a lot of opposition to the current party regime, well, at least there won't be a monopoly and there won't be. this and this will be better, i agree , it will not be without responsibility, friends, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct a survey, we ask you about this, whether you consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective, yes no on... everything is quite simple on youtube, or yes , or not, write your comment under this video if you have your thoughts on ukrainian diplomacy, and if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on the numbers 0800 211 381, if you consider ukrainian diplomacy effective, if you do not consider it effective, 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these

numbers are free, another topic, colleagues , is the existence of such a fee. a form called telegram, because in march 24 mykola knyazhytskyi started talking about the need to create conditions to regulate telegram and contact the founders of telegram to clearly understand what kind of platform it is, who owns it, how they respond to the requests of the ukrainian authorities, almost this week , nikita poturaev from the servant of the people also stated, he said: that we need to understand how to keep telegram under control, or at least contact those who hold this platform, how russia uses it, the head of the parliamentary committee on issues of freedom of speech, yaroslav yurchyshyn supported the idea of ​​regulating

the activities of telegram in ukraine on the air of our tv channel, let's listen to what yur chishyn said. or a response mechanism at the level of official authorities, and it should be quite operational, or so-called media literacy, telegram is a russian network, and therefore to transfer your own private data to it is to question the safety of everyone around you, and you first of all, there are no cities in ukraine, with the possible exception of uzhgorod. but all the same , it flew to the volovets region in the transcarpathian region, no matter what was attacked, and at the same time tolerating a network that most likely has relations and has a clear subordination to the russian special services, just because it is somehow more convenient, well this is basically a simple question

lack of desire to survive, we must survive. war, and in the information war, telegram, tiktok are weapons used against us. t-tok was banned in the united states of america, as far as i remember, and due to the fact that the chinese did not want to contact the american authorities, we had our own practice with similar resources, its bans, and vkontakte classmates in 2014, this began a story from... during the tenure of president poroshenko, these resources were banned, although i remember how, how the users of these networks howled, what it will be, i will not be among my classmates, i have all my classmates there, all my relatives from russia, i will lose them, i don’t know what i will do, but in this situation, andriy, what can we say to telegram users and ourselves, because

we are also active users of telegram channels, where there is a lot of war and telegram channels now... they provide information about the war, what is happening in the country, and about arrivals, about how russia is attacking ukraine in operational mode , can ukrainians live without a telegram, and if there is no telegram, then what can happen, how soon there will be no cinema, no no theater, there will not be continuous television, of course they can and will live without telegram, i am sure of this, because telegram is a truly destructive network. now our politicians are playing telegram, they are also creating various anonymous channels where they pour out incriminating information on each other and criticize each other and try to pour some kind of internal insights into it, literally today i was told that one businessman bought

a well-known telegram channel from another , well, there is some kind of internal kitchen going on, there is some kind of market, and it's... a little bit right put telegram under control, because it is beneficial for many, including in the ukrainian government, but for simple ordinary people like me, who watch this program, i advise you to open google, enter the inscription kremlingram, kremlegram, there is such a site, which gathers all the evidence that telegram is a russian platform dangerous for ukrainians, and i think that you then... and decide that you can somehow live without telegram in your work and in your personal life. larisa, how should you fight and whether you should fight with by telegram and as ours. to explain to the viewers and users of telegram that this network, which is used by the fsb, and they have created 800 or 900 telegram channels there, work all over

the world and try to influence the information field, and the ukrainian one as well, because with the beginning of the great war in there is a boom in telegram channels, well, it is impossible to explain it in any way, because it seems to people that they know everything, yes, yes, there are kremlin channels somewhere, of course, well, i’m a smart person, i… i don’t read gibberish, that is, there is such a certain arrogance that does not work, i believe that there is a method that was still used during the first world war, during the second world war, this closure, the british ministry of the interior had the right to close any publication, then these were printed publications that acted against, in their opinion, acted against the interests of the state, and this the publication already had to prove through the court that it was not such and... in the 40s, when the war just started, when the war with czechoslovakia started, the germans began to occupy czechoslovakia, then britain, of course, as allies and france declared war hitler that

they say we will not tolerate this, and then the british edition of the british yorker is a left-wing publication, a british worker, a worker, and it came out with such a nameless article about the fact that they say it is the war of the imperialists, and we are generally here about... in principle the issue of working with dubious information resources during the war, and then it was closed. we see that at the moment all these platforms, their danger is not only that they spread unverified information, that they are used as a means of struggle, whether commerce. whether it is political, we see the consequences, by the way, in britain for a week and a half horror, simply, pogroms, and when they start to sort things out, it is about spreading

from completely unknown sources, completely false information that has upset the whole of britain and there they cannot, pogroms are going on there, people are just, well, a real horror is happening, which the government cannot cope with, although the government communicates perfectly, we know that telegram has other flaws, such as it reads. book anyone's phone book, and even if in my book, for example, there is no name of mr. yermak, because i am not his wife, girlfriend, mother, or in-law, but nevertheless, someone, for example, has a phone policy where it says papa, that is, i think telegram someone has yermak written in the book, and since it was counted, of course russia... has yermak's phone, and someone's dad has the same phone, and this means where this boy is, where is he, where, where, what school does he go to , that is, it is

so dangerous, we don't even understand that i can be placed with someone, like mrs. larisa, and with someone as someone's acquaintance, mother, and each of us is in danger, because telegram, that's the problem with telegram, it's not even about information, it monitors and russian special services build networks, they know... where is someone's maid, where is someone's neighbor, is your child studying at school with a child, you may not even know whose father this is, but the child will be stolen there, i don't know, and they will start blackmailing you, influence there, well, that is, we are all in danger, because it is a war, and saboteurs are fighting against us, and you cannot explain it people, it's just the state has to step in and stop it, at least for the period of the war, and instead we hear that each and every government institution has created. telegram channel, every politician will create his own telegram channel, well, i'm probably the only one who doesn't have a telegram channel in this country, but i don't, well, i do, that's the humor , but well, we should just close it, because

it dangerous, because it is a tool not only of influence, but also of surveillance, and it facilitates subversive work, when everyone is under attack, well, this is obviously a political decision , obviously, thank you colleagues for the conversation, it was larisa voloshina and andriy dyanitskyi, thank you for the conversation. i would like to remind our viewers that we conducted surveys throughout our broadcast. friends, we asked you about whether you consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective. let's look at the final results, the final results of this poll, the televised one. 16% - yes, 84% - no, these are the results of a televised poll on facebook. in our country, 24% consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective. and 76% no, on this, friends, we will put an end to it there was a verdict program, it was conducted by serhiy rudenko, i'll say goodbye to you until tuesday,

we'll meet you at 8:00 p.m. don't forget we work on all platforms social media including we have a beautiful site 24/7 the most up-to-date information on the site espresso tv read visit support espresso we we work for you, that's all, i wish everyone good health, take care of yourself and your relatives, goodbye. now i have a toothpaste that does more lacalot active plus with a plus of active ingredients, i use it to overcome problems with gums and unpleasant odor, lakat active plus with two-phase technology, actively overcomes bleeding gums and gives fresh breath. lakalut aktiv++ - an action that you feel immediately. the august issue of krania magazine

will tell about the return from captivity. how is ukraine looking for its own? will we return all the children kidnapped by russia? the country touches on painful topics for all ukrainians. we talk to experts, listen to the stories of soldiers who were captured. ask the country in press outlets or pre-pay online. national tv on mhogo is a lot of channels, well, a lot of channels. more movies, cartoons, series and favorite shows. turn mego on a variety of devices without wires and antennas. and all this from uah 49 per month. there are discounts until independence day on temple pills, 10% in pharmacies, plantain, bam and saver. do you suffer from heartburn? i recommend izoto. isota interacts with the acid in the stomach, which leads to a reduction in heartburn symptoms. izota is your water if you are worried about pooch. fm.

galicia listen to yours. the book women at war - a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the duh i litera publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women. who stood up for the defense of the country, the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military, women at war, look for it in bookstores of ukraine, with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation i'm saving myself, reo, you 're ready, dear, ready, i took reo. rheo - water

for special medical purposes. television the premiere of a documentary film about the most difficult 10 years of our lives through the personal stories of extraordinary ukrainians, public activist roman ratushny, journalist and military officer tetyana chornovol, founder of the taira angels unit yulia paevska, writer svitlana povalyaeva, about how we changed, what lessons we learned and which we will never forget. in the tape 10 years of war, exclusively, on the air of the espresso tv channel. a journalist who joined the armed forces, a political expert who became a special agent, taras berezovyts u a new project on espresso. the real front is a thorough analysis of the main events. reports, comments of leading specialists and experts. analytics from the major of the armed forces. how to make sense of disturbing news and distinguish truth from hostile propaganda. the program

"every saturday at 21:30 on espresso. in ukraine 14, it's time to find out about the main news for this hour. greetings to all viewers and to you. you are anna eva melnyk. i will start this episode with the following: at night, the navy of ukraine struck the sivazh gas towers and petro godovanets, which are still controlled by the russians military. the occupiers kept technical intelligence equipment and up to 40 personnel there, a number of ukrainian media reported. we are waiting for official confirmation.