explains his role in international politics, and let's listen because he compared his role to that of a national security adviser. i think no one will dispute that the main diplomat of the country is the president volodymyr zelenskyi, and we can see this from the results, and therefore, certainly, as the head of the president's office, carrying out the president's instructions, i do... uh, i deal with a lot questions, that's the way i work, if you compare how national security advisers work in other countries, and that's why i communicate with colleagues from the united states, for example, with jake salevan, with jens plötner from germany, and with many others. colleagues, why does yermak have to justify himself that he is... that

he is a national security adviser, that he is in the president's team, that he only does what the president tells him, larisa, you know, it's interesting that we are talking about kursk, about yermak, this is just some kind of déjà vu for me, because putin's regime began with a fundamental question that everyone in the west asked each other, fuck putin, no one understood, that is, yeltsin took him somewhere, what kind of person is he, who is he, what is he, and yermak now came out, well, actually he is now... answering the same question, who is mr. yermak, and he found for himself a role model, i congratulate him, now it turns out that he is a sullivan, thank god, but i understand that the adviser on international affairs to the president of the united states is a position that exists, it exists, it means there are clear things, there is his authority, to whom he can give orders, to whom he cannot, whether salimen can give orders orders to blinkin, i don't know, most likely not, what yeermak can do with him at all. another position,

that is, this is how much he tries to explain why he performs the role of sullivan, well conditionally, such as sullivan under president zelenskyi, yes, he hesitates, but you cannot justify it with official duties, if you need an adviser on international issues issues of the president, who has certain powers and weight internationally, in international spaces, well, create this one, create it, let it go, you can, you have both legislative and executive. and i do i understand that many people in the west are very worried about the great influence of a person, that this influence goes beyond the limits of his official duties, and this scares the person for whom they did not vote, that is, this kind of uncertainty scares the representatives of the west...

by the way, we mentioned about putin, today is exactly 25 years since he was appointed prime minister of the russian federation, that is, the collapse of russia under putin began 25 years ago. andriy, regarding andriy yermak, for what? yermak is trying to justify himself, although zelensky clearly said that everything he does is public, what he does yarmak is on my orders, he is doing on my instructions, in fact, more than one president of ours tried to justify the head of the president's office or the head of the administration, yushchenko once said at the faction that baloga is me, well, that's about the same thing that zelensky said too, that's what i wanted emphasize that we have heads. the administration

of the president or the office of the president, they are always a little demonized, so it is in principle in the ukrainian tradition that the role played by yermamak, i think, is not decorative, he is really an influential person, but questions of international politics to him in personally, there are fewer questions for me than questions about domestic politics, it's just international politics, it's such a beautiful track, it's a peace summit, it's a weapon, and it just works there. i agree here with andriy borysovych that zelenskyi, volodymyr, is the chief diplomat, it is precisely his speeches that make parliaments all over the world applaud, it is precisely his charisma on television that attracts the attention of citizens of various countries, forces them to donate to the ukrainian army, support, he is a wonderful actor, we know his previous profession and...

works great, reads wonderful speeches, and yermak's role is, well, organizational, maybe, but there is a huge apparatus that prepares all these meetings and trips. i have a good question, you talked about, let's say, the bright side of yurmak, where he can promote himself and say that here i was at an international meeting, and here i met with important people, but what about domestic politics, that's the most interesting thing what is in us, what does the president's office do, how do they work with business, we know business complaints about... the actions of the president's office, how the government is run from the president's office, that is, there are a lot of issues precisely related to domestic politics. regarding the foreign affairs, yermak said that the president clearly understands which functions in the domestic situation should be performed by the ministry of foreign affairs, and which should be entrusted

to advisers, let's listen to this fragment. today, traditional diplomacy in... unfortunately, it has its limits, today we have to achieve results without having these limits, and that's why we all work as a team of the president, and i don't see any problems with the separation of these powers, my powers are ending on end where it ends the mandate of the president, that is, and the mandate of the president obviously never ends, therefore... the evaluation of the activities of both yermak and zelenskyi will be given by the voters, we can only talk about statements and analyze these statements, and it is obvious that if zelenskyi clearly

said that yermak will leave his positions only when i leave my position, because he works exclusively for ukraine, we can rely on the president of ukraine, he is a human being. which was chosen by the ukrainian people, and the ukrainian people should obviously evaluate, as you think, larisa, as the ukrainian people will evaluate the times of zelensky's presidency? i have no doubt that there will be a negative assessment, and not that, and this does not apply to mr. zelensky himself and the results of his work, it’s just that, firstly, there will be fatigue, and secondly, during his term of office, an extended term of office, a war took place, and this is always an effort , that is, it is always a shock after the experience. obviously , people will try to find who is guilty, who did not save, these are obvious things, here is another question that the ukrainian people, well , first of all, in addition to the assessment, they must draw conclusions, the conclusions are that for many years, under almost every president

, there has been an attempt to increase the powers of the president at the expense of, usurpation of local authorities, to one degree or another by their own people, local authorities, and the judicial system. this struggle for the expansion of the president's powers beyond the limits of his constitutional duties, it has always lasted, and for the first time in ukrainian history, the ukrainian people gave the president colossal carte blanche both in parliamentary and local elections, and everything that is happening, everything that is happening now complains that he also votes for the parliament, sometimes he doesn’t vote, sometimes he went on vacation at the most inopportune moment, then the local government, so it’s not like that... distributes budgets, friends, in fact, you didn’t elect the local government, you don’t know the names of these people, you didn’t elect the parliament, you didn’t knew the names of these people, when you went to vote in your majority for the servant of the people, you gave all the power in the country to one person, volodymyr zelenskyi, and this is

too much, even for a brutish president, seriously, that is why this conclusion, how important democracy is, how the distribution of power in the country of this branch is important authorities and it's not a question of good and bad, when there is a balance, there is distribution, there is a political process for the citizen and for the country, there will be more, more profit, all right, five or six managers cannot manage the country in wartime during the war , because, first of all, it is not dangerous, because these five or six people can also be under the crosshairs of the russian occupiers, and andrii, for that matter. situation, we can say that from the next presidential campaign, because i think that zelensky is still thinking about the next presidential terms, yarmak talked about this in one of the previous interviews, whether the presidential

team now has enough arguments to explain a lot of things in the country, and corruption, and how some tenders are trying to be awarded at inflated prices, and about how is it there... what is happening in the ministry of defense, it was happening in the ministry of defense, i don't know what is actually happening there now, but we are faced with this information every day, and here we must give credit to our colleagues, investigators, because if not... yuriy nikolov from his investigations into these egg contracts there we would never know that the army buys one egg there for 17 hryvnias, and this is also, in principle, we must give credit that during difficult and difficult situations in the country , journalists and investigators do their work . in your opinion, what era will this be in defined after. in order for the mandate to end anyway, let there be an election campaign, i, how can

this period be characterized? i think that in one word it is difficult, and moreover, journalists, investigators, of course, well done, they reveal cases of corruption, but there are also the reaction is not what we would like, not everyone is sitting, but it cannot be said that these investigations are ignored, that is, we know after. on the 17th , the minister of defense was fired, after the investigation on akhmedit, the tender was canceled, that is, there is an attempt to somehow react, at least public scandals, they cause a reaction from the authorities, but if they did not cause any reaction at all, well, then the writing is lost, then of course it is impossible to have anything to do with such a power, here i think there will be many supporters who support it. still, zelensky for a second term, if he leaves, and corruption will not be a minus for him,

because they will write off the fact that it was someone else, and we reacted when it became known, well, when it became unknown, then it is clear that there was no reaction, but eh, will it be possible to repeat such a success as it was in the 19th year, definitely not, i think that support will drop sharply, and if we talk about... the parliamentary elections, then there will be a very colorful and interesting a parliament where there will be many, i would say, not one opposition party, there will be many parties in opposition to the current regime, well , at least there will be no mono-power and no mono-majority and there won’t be, and this and that is better, i agree that it won’t happen without responsibility, friends, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct polls, we ask you about the following, do you think ukrainian diplomacy is effective? no, everything is quite simple on youtube. either yes or no, write your comment under this video if you have

your thoughts on ukrainian diplomacy, and if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote for by numbers 0800 211 381, if you consider ukrainian diplomacy effective, if you do not consider it effective, 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free. another topic, colleagues, is the existence of such a platform, which is called " because in march 24 , mykola knyazhytskyi started talking about the need to create conditions in order to regulate telegram and contact the founders of telegram to clearly understand that what kind of platform is it, who owns it, how do they respond to the requests of the ukrainian authorities, practically the same thing was said this week and nikita poturaev from servant of the people, he said that we... need to understand how to keep telegram under control, or at least

contact those who hold this platform, how russia uses it, head of the parliamentary committee on freedom of speech yaroslav on the air of our tv channel, yurchyshyn supported the idea of ​​regulating the activities of telegram in ukraine, let's listen to what yurchyshen said, or... a reaction mechanism at the level of official authorities, and it should be quite prompt, or the so-called telegram mediagram is russian network, and therefore to transfer your own private data to it is to question the safety of everyone around you, and you first of all, there are no cities in ukraine, except maybe uzhhorod, but still in transcarpathia. the region flew into the volovets region, yes, no matter what was attacked, and at the same time tolerating

a network that most likely has relations and has a clear subordination to the russian special services, just because it is somehow more convenient somewhere, well, in principle, this is a simple question lack of desire for survival, we need survive the war, and he... information war, telegram, tiktok are weapons that are used against us, but tiktok has been banned in the united states of america, as far as i remember. and also due to the fact that the chinese did not want to contact the american authorities, we had our own practice with similar resources, bans, including the vkontakte of classmates, this story began in 2014, and during the term of president poroshenko, these resources were banned, although i remember i wonder how the users of these networks howled, what

will happen, i will not have classmates, i all classmates, all relatives from russia are there. i will lose them, i don’t know what i will do, in this situation, andrei, what can you say to telegram users, and to us, because we are also active users of telegram channels, where there is a war, and there are a lot of telegram channels now information is given about the war, and what is happening in the country, and about arrivals, about how russia is attacking ukraine in operational mode, whether ukrainians can live without a telegram, and... if there is no telegram, then what can happen , as soon as there will be no cinema, no theater, there will be, of course they can and will live without it telegram, i am sure of this, because telegram is a truly destructive network, now our politicians are playing telegram, they are also creating various anonymous channels where they pour out

incriminating information on each other and criticize each other and try to somehow... pour some kind of internal insights there , i was literally told today that one businessman bought a fairly well-known telegram channel from another, well, some kind of internal kitchen is going on, there is some kind of market, and this interferes a little just to put telegram under control, because it is beneficial to many, including the ukrainian authorities, but for simple ordinary people like me, who watch this program, i am happy. open google, type kremlingram, kremlegram, there is such a site that collects all the evidence that telegram is a russian platform that is dangerous for ukrainians, and i think that you will then decide that you can somehow live without telegram in your work and in his personal life. larisa,

how should we fight whether and whether we should fight with the telegram and how our viewers and... to explain to telegram users that this network, which is used by the fsb, and they have created 800 or 900 telegram channels there, work all over the world and try to influence the information field, well , the ukrainian one as well, because with the beginning of the big after the war , we had a boom in telegram channels, well , it is impossible to explain it in any way, because people think they know everything, yes, yes, there are kremlin channels somewhere, of course, well, i am a smart person, i don't read nonsense. that is, there is a certain pride that does not work. i believe that there is a method, which was still applied during the first, during the second world war, this, this closure. the british ministry of the interior had the right to close any publication, then these were printed publications that acted against, in their opinion, acted against the interests of the state, and

this publication had to prove through the court that it was not such, and in the 40s years, when... when the war just started, when the war with czechoslovakia started, the germans started occupying czechoslovakia, then britain, of course, as allies and france declared war on hitler, that they say we will not tolerate this, and then the british publication british yorker is a left-wing publication, a british worker, a worker, and it came out with such an anonymous article about the fact that, they say, this is the war of the imperialists, and we are generally proletarians here. drop it, it means that everything is not good, we know, and then, this publication started with this, in principle, the issue of working with dubious information resources during the war, and then it was closed, we see that at the moment all these platforms, their danger is not only that they spread unverified information that

they are used as a means of struggle, whether commercial or... political, we see the consequences, by the way, in britain for a week and a half already, horror, simply, pogroms, and when they start to understand, it goes right into spreading from completely unknown sources, absolutely false information that has stirred up the whole of britain, and they can’t, pogroms are going on there, people are just, well, a real horror is happening, which the government cannot cope with, although the government communicates perfectly, we know that telegram has other flaws, such as how it reads a book. anyone's phone book, and even if mr. yarmak's name is not in my book, for example, because i am not his wife, not his girlfriend, no no no. there is nothing to blame, but nevertheless, someone, for example, for example, has a political phone where it says papa, that is , he reads telegrams, someone

has yermak written in the book, and since it was counted, of course russia knows yermak’s phone number, and someone has a dad, the same phone, and that means where is this boy, where is his, where, where, where, which school he walks, that is, it’s so dangerous, we don’t even understand that i... i can be seen by someone as ms. larisa, and by someone as someone’s acquaintance, mother, and we are each in danger, because the telegram, that’s this is the problem of the telegram, not even in the information, it monitors, and the russian special services build networks, they know where whose maid is, where whose neighbor is, whether your child is studying at school with the child, you may not even know whose father this is, but the child they will steal there, i don't know, and they will start blackmailing you, influence there, well, that is, all of us... are in danger, because it's a war, and saboteurs are fighting against us, and you can't explain it to people, it's just that the state has to step in and stop it, at

least for the duration of the war, and instead we hear, in our country, every, every government agency has created its own telegram channel, every politician created his own telegram channel, well, i'm probably the only one who doesn't have a telegram channel in this country, but not me, well, i'm like that , that's the humor, but well, we should just close it, because it's dangerous, because it's a tool. not only influence, but also follow-up, and it facilitates subversive work, when everyone is under attack, well, this should be an obvious political decision, obviously. thank you, colleagues, for the conversation, it was larisa voloshina and andriy dyanitskyi, thank you for the conversation, i would like to remind our viewers that throughout our broadcast we conducted a poll, friends, we asked you about this, do you think ukrainian diplomacy is effective, let's see on final results, final results. fathers of this television survey 16% - yes, 84% no, these are the results of a television survey on

facebook, we have a ratio of 24% who consider ukrainian diplomacy to be effective, and 76% who do not. we will put an end to this, friends, it was a verdict program, it was conducted by serhiy rudenko, i will say goodbye to you until tuesday, we will meet you at 20:00, do not forget that... we work on all platforms, in social networks, including we have a beautiful site that works 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. the most effective information on the espresso tv website, read, come in, support espresso, we work for you. that's it, i wish you all the best health, take care of yourself and your relatives, goodbye. there are discounts until independence day on essential ford 10% at potorozhnyk pam and ochadka pharmacies. there are discounts until independence day on

motorx tablets 10% at psylshynik pam and ochadka pharmacies. there are discounts until independence day on trok sevazin 15% at psalozhnyk bam and ochadka pharmacies . vasyl zima's big broadcast, my name is vasyl zima, it's a big broadcast on the espresso tv channel, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, my colleagues and i will talk about the most important thing, for two hours to to learn about the war, about the military front, the component, serhii zurets, and what the world is like, yuriy fizar is already in front of me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside ukraine, yuriy, good evening, two hours to be aware of the economic news, time to talk about money during the war oleksandr is sulking in the hood with me. of sports news, i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, cultural news, alina chekchenina, our art watcher is ready to say good evening, presenters who

have become familiar to many already next to by me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i greet you, good day, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl winter's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening. on espresso. there is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. we are engaged in propaganda. russia is throwing millions of petrodollars into turning ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become russia. let's counter information attacks russians in the chronicles of information war project with olga len. tuesday-thursday. at 17:15, repeat tuesday, friday at 22:00. greetings , this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already

come to the very point. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live drone attacks, kamikaze. political analytics. objectively and meaningfully. there is no political season. exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. shot. svoboda live is frank and unbiased . you draw your own conclusions. the most decorated olympic athlete of independent ukraine, there is saber athlete olga harlan, who has two gold, one silver and three bronze awards in her treasury, but if we talk exclusively about gold, then yana klochkova has four medals in swimming, but if harlan has a clear pro-ukrainian position, then she is a goldfish, as before they called klochkova, betrayed ukraine,

moved to the occupied crimea and nothing. did not condemn the actions of russia. my name is myroslav vysochanskyi. this is the manuscript program. now you will learn about the history of ukrainians and ukraine at the olympic games. let's talk about it with our guest. this is ivan yaremko, a ukrainian sports historian and archivist. mr. ivan, greetings. i congratulate you. in 1994 , the ukrainian national team took part for the first time as an independent independent team at the winter olympic games in 1994, but before that ukrainians took part. participation in the olympic games as part of other states, different countries, and already in 1896, mykola ritter, a ukrainian, allegedly took part in the first olympics, which had just appeared under the chairmanship of de coubertin, and also later in the first ukrainian international olympic committee ukrainian oleksii butovsky. ukrainians at the olympic games, who is still the first champion of the olympic games, who still has

the first gold medal. is a ukrainian, ukrainians performed at many olympic games, including before the war, but in the composition of really other countries, in particular there was bihun bilas, he performed for the team of the united states of america, there was figure skater turushenko from chernivtsi university from bukovyna, he performed for romanian team, they were ukrainian. and participated in the olympic games, as the first ukrainians, and the first ukrainian, who won a lot of medals, it was viktor chukarin, our native of lviv, in 1952 performing for the first time, then the soviet union entered the olympic family for the first time and performed with his team, so viktor chukarin won in 1952, and then in 1956, seven '. gold, three silver

and one, 11 medals, more, was won only by a ukrainian, larisa latynina, she won where 18, 18 medals, in total, of which nine were gold, but if we return to those first olympic games , until 1896, and this mykola ritter, on which, which on them arrived, a ukrainian, can we say this... about the beginning of the actual ukrainians at the olympic games, or was it more like a trial version there? i think it was, he came by himself without representing anyone, the fact that he was of ukrainian origin, well, it could be different, but he did not represent himself, and therefore to think that this is a ukrainian origin, i would did not do this. look, if we talk about the fact that ukrainians participated in the olympic games, they participated in

different countries, but ukraine. as a host never appeared in the olympic games, but in 1980 it hosted the famous olympiad, the olympiad that was supposed to be held in moscow, because moscow presided, kyiv hosted several football competitions, why this olympiad is famous, because it was not boycotted by 66 countries, came for it, how kyiv was preparing then and how kyiv itself was preparing for the olympics, well, i want to say that not only. but even then leningrad, st. petersburg, then tallinn, where the regatta was held, so several cities of the soviet union still hosted the olympic games, of course, kyiv was licked until cleanliness, and they drove a few policemen there to keep order, and...