your conclusion. vitaly usatiy went to court and the country's highest judicial body supported his position. the anti-corruption center emphasizes that the grand chamber of the supreme court broke its own practice and manipulated the law, because the procedure for evaluating judges with negative conclusions of the supreme court has been working in the plenary for almost eight years. it was observed by both the previous and current vkks. the great chamber also recognized this. in particular, in the decision regarding ex-sudden solomianskyi. of the district court of kyiv maria zelinska and the judge of the economic court of the kyiv region pavlo gorbasenko. we counted at least five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier in the same same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it is really necessary for such a decision to be supported by the entire plenary composition of the highest qualification commission of the court. and the decision

of the collegium is actually not enough. the decision of the grand chamber of the supreme court contains a number of dangers for judicial reform. according to preliminary estimates, it can help about 180 judges who have already received negative conclusions from the public council to remain in their positions. virtue this decision of the grand chamber helps these, specifically 180 people to avoid this procedure now, and in fact they are already automatically leaving. evaluated, if this practice and this decision of the grand chamber, the higher qualification commission and the vrp now take as a basis and say that we must apply this decision to all these judges, then this means that these people are automatically considered to have passed the qualification assessment and everything is good about them, this is a guarantee of their future. in the professional community call the decision of the grand chamber harmful, because in the unscrupulous judges who

will now be able to avoid evaluating dozens of odious surnames. these are, in particular, nataliya prytula, judge of the shevchenkiv district court of the city of kyiv, judge of the maidan, volodymyr serdynskyi, judge of the brovarsky district court of the kyiv region, who was exposed to nabu for a bribe of 4,000 dollars. victoria dzharty, a judge of the commercial court of kyiv, loves luxury items and owns luxury real estate. oleksandr lutsenko, judge of the obolon district court of the city of kyiv, judge. serhii chvankin, head of the kyiv district court of odessa, his family's firm owns luxury apartments in miami. pavlo gorbasenko, the head of the economic court of the kyiv region, owns elite real estate, sky-high fortunes and practices fictitious divorces, passed illegal decisions that had signs of raiding. judges dmytro kostenko and andriy fedorchuk, kyiv district administrative court. fedorchuk, in particular, is known for canceling nationalization. private bank and suspended

the renaming of the uoc of the moscow patriarchate. it is the same, for example, with judge dzyuba, regarding whom there is information that his wife has russian citizenship. this is judge otrosh, who allowed herself to say at a meeting of the committee that it was actually the ukrainian authorities who were not to blame for not ensuring the inviolability of the borders in crimea, which has millions, well, millions of unexplained property and so on. all these judges with such a position will be able to avoid the end of the qualification evaluation and keep their positions to themselves. the anti-corruption center has no doubt that after making a decision in the case of judge usatoy, the grand chamber played along with the entire so-called judicial mafia. in 2017, the judge-rapporteur in this case, oleg kryvenda, himself received the conclusion of the state administrative court on non-compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics. however, this did not prevent him from receiving a positive one. the decision

of the supreme court of appeals, mr. krivenda also received a negative opinion from the public integrity council, and to which there were also a number of questions regarding the origin of his property and assets, and of course, it is clear that with such an approach, the presiding judge in the case has, let's say, at least biased to respectively. to this category of case, and therefore we can talk about a certain kind of such a conflict of interest, where the judge, being dissatisfied with his own conclusion of the public integrity council, is ready to play along and help other judges who have the same problem. the grand chamber of the supreme court tried to explain its decision, but did so not very convincingly. in particular, judges. they said that they were changing the practice

because the legislator changed the law, and the vkk changed its own regulations. there is such a justification manipulation by the grand chamber insists in the anti-corruption center, after all. thus, with each new change in the law , decisions made in the old version will have to be recognized as illegal. unfortunately, we are now seeing the result of this, when, in particular , the rapporteur in the case of usatoy, who had a negative conclusion of the general court, adopts, well, writes a decision, the grand chamber accordingly approves, agrees, issues it, and we see a situation where they make a 180° turn position, at the same time very not justified and do not meet the same criteria as before established when it is possible to change the position, because all the previous decisions were completely different in similar situations. currently , about 1,800 ukrainian judges have to pass the evaluation qualifications, including representatives

of the odious oask and pechersk district courts of kyiv. according to the anti-corruption center , individual questionable members of the supreme council of justice and the supreme council of justice may try to interpret the supreme council's decision. the court in such a way as not only to help unscrupulous servants of themis, but also to undermine future qualification evaluation procedures. very important, in fact, that these two institutions continue the qualification evaluation in the same order as it was before, and the decision in the case of judge usatovoy be considered an individual decision, specifically in this case, which should not be applied absolutely to all cases, but it is already clear that in these institutions also have members who believe that this decision should be applied to the rest of the judges, so there will be a kind of struggle here, and what will be the result and what will be the consequence, in fact, it is difficult to predict at the moment, the precedent that

the grand chamber has set in terms of harsh and groundless change of its own practice, indicates that there may be other decisions of the supreme court ahead, which in the end will simply be buried. judicial reform is undertaken in the center of anti-corruption, and therefore cleaning the supreme court and restoring trust in it should become an urgent issue for society, because in recent years the supreme court has been marked by numerous dubious practices and the dishonesty of its individual representatives. in general, i consider this a signal that both the supreme court and the grand chamber in principle need on the contrary, to purify, because if such an approach to work acquires... a systemic character, then in the future it will be possible to make such strange decisions, depart from practice and interpret as law, in fact, as you like, because the grand chamber actually has a lot for this resources and opportunities. we hope that individual members

of the supreme judicial council and the supreme council of justice will be able to overcome the desire to play along with the so-called judicial mafia, and will not automatically apply the decision of the grand chamber to all judges with a negative result. by the conclusions of the state audit office, giving them possibility to keep positions. be that as it may, this will be a real test of both institutions' integrity and ability to work impartially. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week.

i welcome you, dear viewers, to the air tv channel today we have a conversation that is worth hearing, we will talk with the president of ukraine. a full-scale war, the war, as started by russia, of aggression, as started by russia against ukraine, has been going on for the 11th year. if we speak for now, during this period, ukraine defended its independence, subjectivity, sovereignty, and the question is only in the return of certain territories, or is the question more precisely in the defense and in the election of both subjectivity and independence? it seems to me. that, if you make such an excursion in 30, 33 years, then it happened wonderful, i think that not just many, but i think most people in the world, i would ask

them to find ukraine on a map, they would look for it on some other continent, and today being ukrainian is beautiful, proud. starting from the highest politicians, especially in europe, everyone pays attention to the fact that this is not just a nation, it is a cool nation. which is filled with principles that are enviable to many, obviously, we ourselves understand that for almost 300 years of this moscow rule, where everything national, everything identical was excluded from us, we accustomed to foreign heroes, to foreign culture, to foreign custom, to foreign memory, to foreign people. and so on and so forth, there is no end to this, but we still raised our heads after 300 years,

remembered that we are a nation, that we had one of the largest states in europe, which was 800 years before any muscovy, in other words, we have learned this course of national establishment in such a way that from generation to generation we passed on not just this dream, not just this... dream is like genetics, it is already in a spiral and was passed on to each subsequent generation, and each subsequent generation had its own leaders, i have many times in polemics, in discussions, here i give an example, in the 20th century, to be more precise, from november 17th to... august 91st, we proclaimed independence six times in different

interpretations, six times, and look, carpathian ukraine held out for a day and a half and they took it from us on the red field. the bandera state lasted almost three days. listen, six times, that says a lot that it's a code. this is the code of the nation, and that is why today we talk about the 33rd year of the newest independence, in fact, this, you know, is our longest national journey in the last 300 years, from the cossack state, from vegovsky, and this in itself is already surprising, and if we remember that 300 years of statelessness, 171. times we were deprived of the right to speak ukrainian language, to have one's own alphabet,

to have one's own writing, remember the dream of taras hryhorovych, and we are talking about the time, the middle of the century before last, taras hryhorovych's biggest dream was to publish a primer in the ukrainian language, everything, you know, is heart -wrenching. we just received our primer one and a half hundred years ago, before that we were not given a liturgy, nor the right to speak our language, our language, nor to wear our shirt, god forbid, if not yet dead ukraine sings, well , magadan, magadan, and there with white ukrainian bones in the ceiling, this is all. taiga and tundra, so in fact, you know, i am proud

of the fact that such torments are common, i think most nations would not have survived, and we also went through the difficult school of our formation, we went through great memorylessness, when after the greatest tragedies, in we were to be erased in memory with an eraser everything not to mention. neither children nor grandchildren, er, the greatest human tragedies in europe, and despite everything, despite everything, you know, we got to the edge, edge, of this abyss, and today we have become a state that everyone in the world knows, everyone is proud of, i am struck by how, you know, even in europe there are many examples, political with reference to what a great national work, what a great european work ukraine is doing today, what is ukraine, the bulletproof vest of europe,

how much of what ukrainians do is not enough in europe who did actually, that one an example is the work we are doing against the greatest evil in the world, against russian fascism, against the greatest chemical pure evil, in general, which can be in today's history. this is the moscow occupation that ukraine is experiencing today, it has become such a page of education for europe and the world, but... after all, when you think about it and answer with your conscience, putin as the world knows it today was actually brought up by western politics, putinization, which accepted , which was adopted by europe, is a product of the last, well, maybe 17 years, 15 years, when europe

mindlessly paid putin 1 billion dollars every day, violating... all the norms that were adopted both nationally and europeanly, regarding energy quotas on the regional market, violating everything, bringing in 1 billion dollars per day, this is of course what led putin's path to schizophrenia, to recklessness, to the loss of the last parts of the mind, when in fact the world appears ... the version of fascism of the 21st century, this is what happened before our eyes, and on the other hand, the feat that our nation is doing today, and the nation, which was 30 years ago, or rather there 35 years ago, when in

in 1990, there was a vote for the ukrainian parliament. the ukrainian nation cast 239 votes for the moscow bosyaks, and that was the name of group 239, that's group 239, a few more months pass in the spring, march of 1991, when the ukrainian nation is asked if you are there for a renewed union, why do you need this independent ukraine, more than 70% of ukrainians yes, yes, we are for a renewed union. probably another 6 months will pass there to reach december, 91% of the kuryn people, no, no, no, no, we are for a sovereign, independent ukraine, this can be analyzed politically, as for 12 calendar months, the nation of the state, when the tatars

were walking, they voted for evil, because red, red russia... bolshevism, this is a separate breed of moscow slavery, which was established in ukraine for 73 years, the time is coming and we will vote for them again, yes moreover, excuse me, in 98, if i am not mistaken, how many ukrainians voted for the communist party of ukraine in the verkhovna rada of ukraine. we can formally say that the section was preserved for the longest time in the ukrainian parliament. of the communist party, you won't find them even in europe with a magnifying glass, where are those communists, v in ukraine, they still reigned, and they were not just in the parliament, but they were the golden card of the parliament, they were lured by money to vote for any law, which, who needs 2.5 dozen votes there, but you

have to go to the communists. are sold at every step, well, i'm going to the point that... what maturation has the ukrainian nation gone through in these 33 years, how are we from that world that we don't even want to talk about, which, frankly , we're ashamed to talk about, because you know, living in europe and at the beginning of the 20th century to have a terrorist organization of the communist party in the parliament russia, and it is, there was never a communist party of ukraine, it was... a russian communist party, because the soviet union is russia, it is not, yes, in general, you approach the fact that we have crossed colossally, colossally big boundaries behind these eyes 33 years, i understand how a large part of people can be dissatisfied with something, but in general

it can be said that this is a great progress. and if we had this sense of national awareness that we have today, we had it in the 90s, i think we would be where poland is, where lithuania is, even where bulgaria is, even where romania is, we would be in a different class, organization of the political system, we would also have... other friends, other partners, that is, they were in a better place far away, in the best sense of the word. at the same time, you talk about the fact that in the struggle we are currently waging. uh, against russia, and i emphasize the word russia, because it is evil russia, it is not only putin, because putin feeds on the same russian

swamp, what is called the russian people, it is a tool for the legalization of putinism as such, therefore it cannot be separated, here is one a negative personality, but... the absolute evil is putin and, on the opposite side, the institution of nobility is the people of russia, no, no, he gave birth to putin, he gave birth to lenin, he gave birth to stalin, he gives birth to all evil, but how can i say it, i don't i want to do a deep analysis of what is being done in russia in that swamp, and i would like to talk more about... ukraine, and when you remember the lessons of our liberation struggles, the lessons that our best minds teach,

well, for example, like taras hryhorovych , shevchenko, when he writes this, addressing, it seems to me, that he stands behind ukrainians even today and saying this, my beloved country is innocent, i have this word. not guilty, every time, it surprises me where taras hryhorovych took such a deep, apt and pure word: my beloved country is not guilty, for which the lord punishes you, punishes you severely, for bohdan and for the mad peter, in other words, taras hryhorovych wanted to say , ukrainians, if you want to... find out where the root of your disaster is, where it is buried, is it russia, or the fifth column that

is forming in ukraine, these bohdans, or the crazy petros or vladimirs, or josephs, no, no, no, no, it's not as important as you say, that's why every national movement that we had, it essentially started with... one slogan: stay away from russia, if you want to be happy, stay away from russia, don't argue , that there is something cheaper, that there is something bigger, that there is something more accessible, away from russia, and therefore, when this picture based on the story of mykola hryhorovych felyavy, who was not allowed to write for years, this ukrainian genius finally came. he invites his friends, sister, brother-in-law, who still lives in the house, come come to me tomorrow, i will show you how

to write, they came, but this unrealized talent, wait for me a minute, went to another room and shot myself, that is, i am leading to the fact that... this independence, this sovereignty, this is the self-awareness in which we live today, this is a fantastically great ukrainian work, this is what then gives such nourishment to various spheres and necessarily to the material sphere, to our development, social prosperity and others, which may come later, but this necessarily the phase of that state when we become these... internally consolidated, and we are solving those problems that maybe two or three hundred stood as a problem before ours, we

will talk about the economy, because i will be very interested in your opinion, as a person who was once recognized as the best banker in the world, i don't remember which it was a year ago, it's true, but there was definitely such a story, and i remember, because i lived in those times and already followed the history... you were in the position of prime minister, it wasn't just that, of course, now there's a war, now is probably the most difficult in the entire period of independence, but before that i would still like to ask you, as a person who does not just talked to putin, he came home, ate borscht, in my opinion, even, and you said a very good phrase that money made him stupid, that is, material things ceased to have any meaning for him, he obviously decided to go down in history, so i am interested your opinion, how to stop it, and therefore all of russia and what? there is, does this understanding reach the world leaders, this individual, as the late kozlovsky, a prisoner and writer, said, he

said that it is... to a greater extent now an infernal personality, what is putin, of course, i am not neutral can talk about putin, i mean evil, i mean it as revenge, a reasonable person cannot be in such circumstances, to which he made the country go, i think that in 25 years he has created the most unsuccessful project for russia, how to... destroy such country like russia, and i am convinced that one of the formats of victory in today's war consists not only in how to reach the mykhailivskyi farm with ukrainian troops and stop there, it is not about that, if we leave the evil that is called putin, and with him putin's russia, fascist russia, where putin is fed. as the energy of 145 million little

putins, and this is the beginning of the source of putinism, this is the blessing that they give. yes, if we stop at mykhailivski farm, it will be a big mistake. i don't want to say that we should physically remind of the green wedge, of the crimson wedge, of the yellow wedge, of the gray wedge, of... ukrainian taganrog, ukrainian bilhorod, ukrainian kuban, well, in one word, that's what i wanted it is impossible to name a whole series of extreme territories where the ukrainian presence is, it is centuries-old, centuries-old, this is not what we are talking about now, we we are not talking about this dimension of geography, we are talking now, if europe, if the world does not understand that there can be no victory... maybe,

in which the putin regime continues to exist, that there is no negotiation process, when president putin is sitting in one of the chairs, that's the first sign that you've lost, that you're giving some form of nourishment to this mess, you don't need it, i'm talking about the portuguese. whether about the germans or the french, you don't need him, he will take you away tomorrow. in what form? let 's not guess now, i just want one thing to say that today, if you have not solved the topic of security, you have not solved any of the issues that are on your agenda, security is such a thing that knows no borders, regardless of whether you are 600 km away, or 10 thousand or 1, and that is why, obviously,

the big task for the world today is how to correctly formulate the definitions of getting out of the war brought by putin. i just want to emphasize one thing, so as not, no, no, there, not to generate any prejudicial discussions: the presence of putin at any conference, the presence of a need. putin's signature on behalf of the prison of the peoples does not give the answer to our victory, it should not be left for tomorrow, and then we quietly approach the thoughts that i think are very undervalued in today's world. i am afraid, or i am wary, that the syndrome that we

experienced. in the 90s, when the president of the united states arrives from the rostrum of the parliament, he says in the 93rd year that ukrainians, don't you dare to create sovereignty, and george bush, from whom everyone expected support, absolutely, on the streets of kyiv for three months there are many thousands of rallies for independence, the president of the largest democratic country comes and says: you, you don’t dare to do this, don’t dare, to me, and i’m sorry that he went to kyiv then after moscow or to moscow, well, in any by the way, it was a visit by the way, i know that the speech he gave in the verkhovna rada on the way from the airport to leonid makarovich, well, he gave either theses or verbally what he wanted to say, read it like that...