which we experienced in the 90s, when the president of the united states comes from the rostrum of the parliament, says in the 93rd year that ukrainians, don't you dare to create sovereignty, and george bush, from whom everyone expected support, absolutely, on the streets thousands of rallies for independence have been taking place in kyiv for three months, the president the most. the state of democracy comes and says: don't you dare to do this, don't dare, i 'm sorry that he stopped by my way to kyiv then after moscow or to moscow, well, in any case, it was a visit by road, i know that he the speech that he gave in the verkhovna rada, on the way from the airport to leonid makarovich, well , whether he gave theses or verbally what he wanted to say, that's how it was read... so how did he agree with leonid

makarovich as the chairman of the verkhovna rada, well, in one word, i have i have a heavy feeling that today the world has stopped and the european one is at a crossroads, if tomorrow after the end of this war we see in the bosom of russia in the russian model in... its presence in this political field, i think that we are doing huge mistake, huge mistake, we make that one the time-out that putin needs most today, in order to then come to the borders of poland, slovakia, and bulgaria, and continue to do the evil deed for which he saw the russian mission. when, you know, on

the same question, where is the end of russia, where, where are its borders, from peter the first we hear such a historical aphorism that the borders of russia are where its interests end, a good wording, then the wording of putin in the 2000s , well, to be more precise, it was in 2006. at one of the language conferences expressed by his wife, the report, which was written in kremlin, and she voiced the position of the kremlin. russia ends there, guys, where the russian language ends. for the past three months, putin has been conducting an elective course in history, a regular one, and there he asks the boy. to a boy seven or eight years ago, where

the borders of russia end, and i am trying to remember the geography of that boy, to name something correctly, where are those borders, he approaches him like this, smoothes his head, and if he saves him from this impasse, and gives advice drunk to the russian nation, remember. russia has no borders, so how are you going to deal with it philosophy, this is not a joke, well, as a president, the president of the country comes out, every word, it is official, and he says that his state, which occupies 1/8, which leads today, maybe 10 wars, maybe even more, and count how many wars there are in africa, count africa, count the caucasus, count eastern europe, and this is a country. a member of

the united nations, the highest security organization in the world, chaired the security council, a member, a permanent member of the security council, this is a country, an aggressor, this is a country where its leader is recognized an international criminal, at every step in europe a photo is wanted of a criminal, putin and so on and so forth, and we live in such a world, this is a country that has not formally passed the... formal acceptance into the membership of the united nations organization. well, listen, wonder, wonder, what kind of world is this? so, what i 'm getting at is that no one can use the answer with such a russia. today, to sit down with him for negotiations, it means to repeat munich in the 38th year. do you remember when chamberlain flew in, waved one sheet of paper and said: "i'm your peace brought me while you were walking." i worked

diplomatically, it was great, i brought you peace, i was speaking right there in france, and now we are standing, listen, we need red sloths. we need to listen, that this executioner of nations, prisons of nations, speak , warns, this is a territory where more than 100 indigenous peoples live under the cover of colonialism, where someone's native language dies every two years, listen, we are in a terrible world, in fact, and that's why, when in europe... they try to form some kind of tolerance that it is possible to make a deal with this evil in general several years, this is a very wrong policy, on the other hand, ukraine gives you an example of how to fight for your sovereignty, for

your independence, how to actually be the armored car of europe. how is it possible, in other words , to enter the territory of the country. and make putin read something from a piece of paper with trembling hands, having gathered his generals and not knowing what to do, it turns out that yes, it was possible, here again, they do not understand what it will all lead to, but we understand that ukraine sometimes shows , just such an example to your words about the fact that europe does not know what to do with putin, but at the time, in the battle of peregavgamel , alexander the great showed what could be done with the persian empire by destroying an army that was ten times larger, but it was not possible to completely destroy the world of empires. but the world of the empire collapsed 100 years after in half, that is, now, without taking a certain step, we will just drag it out in time, then it can be absolutely, paragraph number one, do not look for a partner in putin, he will never be, he is a speculator who today's will use the historical position to

knock on your door tomorrow, and so be wiser, although it makes it more difficult, certainly the things that we say that the answer ... how to democratize russia, i do not find it in the answer that will come one ideal democratic force, which will now be supported by 144 million russians, i take this as a conditional figure, there is no such force and there never will be, in the regime of a dictatorship, this force very... well feeds putin, his government, and his junta. the problem of russia, by the way, is not only russia, perhaps, putin’s evil triumphs, no, not because

in russia there is so much, and it is so strong, what we call evil. i think in the formula of existence. the strongest point is that in russia there are most indifferent people, and indifferent people, they automatically close with evil, and it, and it triumphs, and it is because of indifference, you know, when you, when you go out on the tver boulevard and stand like this near the memorial pendulum to the ukrainian prince dolgoruky, you are arrested when today we talk about the information world, where instant eyes are exchanged, billions of megabytes of memory, more than 1

thousand journalists in russian prisons, several thousands of political prisoners of all levels, local and up to the highest. this is a country that lives among us, how are you going to arrange your future with such inhumans, in general, do you not feel the danger with this indifference that exists in russia, which is brought up as a political system, no state institution works there, it does not exist parliament, neither the upper house, nor the lower house, this is a printer that will... give you any regulations by the evening, any, start a new war, within 15 minutes the documents are already signed by putin, any evil, it will be so scaled that the community, whether political, domestic,

or in europe or in the world, has no way to stop it, sooner or later we want to come to terms that such a political system with such a leader... which is today in russia, the world does not have a green light for its existence, no, sooner or later. rather, at the most inconvenient time, they will knock on your door and say: what you slept on two years ago, three years ago, evil, what you slept on, what you did not decide and acted inadequately, it is now knocking on your door, and whether you are poles, or you are german, or you are french, you will give the answer that you did not give 5 years ago. in fact, the awakening of the world is evident. if you, if you remember, in the 22nd year, how

french president macron spoke with putin for 16 hours, it's just a miracle, this is one of the leaders of europe, calling the criminal who opened a new world war, what are you asking him to do, about what are you begging him to do, well, at the beginning of the conversation, put a healthy analysis, he will let go of your call the territories he occupied? no, will his plan to escalate new territories change? no, what is the purpose of your calls? whether the elections of chancellor scholz are held and in one of the interviews, the first interviews, he says that germany will not give ukraine. as if the question was: what would germany not give to ukraine? no, the question was, what will germany give to ukraine? so

katzler began by devoting 2/3 of his speech to the fact that germany won't give, that won't give, that won't give, that won't give, that's gone, yes, and what will germany give? at the end speech he says: "germany will give 500 cash and 2,500 field bags with a red cross." yes, that's right. listen now to chancellor scholz, he tears putin, and even on a human level, without any patience, he uses the most profound characteristics of manner, actions, gestures. listen today, french president macron. as a person after all. how to say, these scenarios, how to modernize the world, how to learn to respond to

the disaster that russia brings, come to the concept of a new security and defense policy of europe, along with nato, when the president of the united states of america said that the europeans should rethink their attitude to the formation of resources. nato europe is simultaneously coming to the point that , alongside nato, you must have your own original project that provides an answer to the urgent security of europe, and where in ukraine one of the most interesting places is allocated, and where, by the way, the european union commission is right now is working on europe's first security project, and the second commission is how to respond to the challenges posed by china, the united states. america for the european economic market. in this way

, i conclude that today we are witnessing a rethinking of many established relationships. and perhaps, during the 25 years of putin's reign, russia has reached the lowest point of disrespect for itself and for the policy it forms. i can definitely testify that you will not find russia in the first row of countries that shape the politics of europe or the world, i think that they are not there in the second either, this is, you know, a bologna, on which water, we will not name the leaders of the second countries, and not more, and no more, just the dependent colonial state that it is today, and with those unique opportunities... more than 40% of the world's

resource wealth is concentrated in russia, i have two blitz questions and one a little broader, so that we have time, because here we are already we are about ukraine and its perspective. blitz of questions, you know that, we need to dispel myths, some of them, i will not ask, i will not ask about nuclear weapons, because those documents were not signed in your time, but many people say so, well, this is a common story, but it was necessary to press in 2008 at the summit nato, and we would have been accepted into nato, then a number of countries gained membership there, there was expansion, and if very briefly... why then, i understand that it did not depend on ukraine there, we remember putin, on that, his words, we remember that ukraine is not even a state, but why then, or what they said, here's what they said to you, that is, you won't be able to catch the conditional chancellor of the federal republic of germany or someone else to say, well, come on , and how they argued, as if,

well, they don't threaten you, well, what do you want, well, let's talk about... let's start with 94 year the 94th year of the memorandum, which, i believe, from the point of view of the mission for the world, ukraine with its step put the last point in the end of the cold war, or as it is called the third war. i think that the leadership of ukraine at that time was extremely respectful. to the mission of guaranteeing the security of ukraine within the framework of the signed document. there are two direct points in the document that testify to the creation of a full guarantee of your territorial integrity and

political sovereignty, and there is a signature under this document. the president of the united states, the president of france, britain, the chairman of the people's assembly of china, one might say, the entire nuclear club, from the position of 1994, one can read that listen, no country in the world, except ukraine, has such a document, such weight, why in this way, because now it is possible to analyze... so analytically already, why were tactical weapons not brought out by brackets, were they not limited to carriers and so on, why did ukraine act the way it did and signed this memorandum, my short answer: we were one on one then

we were not supported by russia, obviously, in that sense. no matter how much ukraine would like to see the toolkit for the formation of ukrainian security, the united states did not support us, because the general task - the third nuclear arsenal must be dismantled, and this united the united states and russia, and it made it possible to connect the other three members of the nuclear club of the world, and when it was necessary to form... even the constitutional period of relations or in the 14th year or in the 22nd year, it was very difficult for us to form a round table of consultations with our guarantors, and until today, by the way, this five never sat down at the table, well five, not five,

but the four never sat down at the table, and in my opinion it did. for the safety, security policy of the world, a very unpleasant fact of history, i don't know how the world will talk, for example, to the north korean leadership about nuclear disarmament, when the time comes, or to iran, or to iran, or to pakistan, or with three more countries, about which we can already say today that... the fact is most likely that they possess nuclear fission, as with what kind of argument will the nuclear world, the nuclear club give them, when there is an example of ukraine, which sincerely and openly accepted the proposals of the nuclear club, and suffered, by

the way, the question is this war, so to speak, in your opinion, is there a home? existence today, i do not know at what level or through what channels, that it will not be completed in any case with the use of nuclear weapons, it is this war that was unleashed by russia, well, at least now ukraine is directly participating in it as an opponent of the aggressor . nuclear risk assessment of the conflict of the nuclear factor in terms of temperature, everything cools, cools, cools, and the world comes to understand more that, well, actually... the first sign of the death of putin putin is a sign of his use of anything from the nuclear arsenal. this is a war with the whole world. this is his personal death and the end of this war, and today, somehow

, not everyone understands about these red lines, where they pass, and that is , actually, at the end, should you put such a final point and already, because there are still many questions, unfortunately, time no, taras formula grigoryovych, whom you have mentioned more than once, fighting to fight today is a really effective formula, and it is obviously something that should be wished for. for ukrainians today, this is definitely, for the ukrainian part, the most important part of the answer, regarding our victory, is the understanding that our strength is in our hands, this is the first thing, and this strength is formed by the national spirit, not ak-47, not s-300, not anything, ah, if you have a late... spirit, you are the bearers, the authors of victory. viktor andriyovych ivshchenko was with us, the president of ukraine. thank you for being with us, listening, stay tuned,

see you continues war, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. we are engaged in propaganda. russia is throwing millions of petrodollars into turning ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become russia. countering russian information attacks in the chronicles of information war project with olga len. tuesday, thursday at 17:15, repeat tuesday, friday at 22:00. weekly. jagurska meets with the head of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish sejm, pawel kowal, the representative of the polish government for the restoration of ukraine. as always we we are talking about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, europe. what is being said

about ukraine in the eu, how should we perceive the statements of european politicians and what will our accession to the eu look like. in the project close to politics , close to the world with maria gurska. every sunday at 15:30 with a repeat at 22:00 in cooperation with eu sisters.

exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. nato member countries have huge arsenals. russia is already on the verge of exhausting its resources. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they capable of...

help to understand the present and predict the future, they offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. politclub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. see this week in the collaborators program. fake ministers of the temporarily occupied luhansk region. thanks to management, today our region is flourishing and developing. who received a mandate from the occupiers and is russifying the captured territories? we are for a strong russia, it has only such a future. greetings, i'm olena kononenko, and this is the collaborator program about traitors who are on call. hearts and wallets went to serve the rashi occupiers. in the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine, russia creates such ministries, and many collaborators prefer

to take positions in these illegitimate bodies there. to become a minister, deputy or at least director of the department, the main goal is almost each seller. today i will tell you about such fake institutions, who runs them and how they are used by the occupiers. let's start with the ministers of the temporarily occupied luhansk region. the first in line for defamation is the so-called minister of culture of the lpr dmytro serhiyevich sidorov. when in september 2013, kyiv sent information about what would be the status of the russian language as a regional language, luhansk, donetsk were the first regions to say that we think and speak in russian , and if you want to ban it, then to us no further on the road, this supporter of the russian language and culture is 34. he was born in the city of lysichansk, luhansk region, graduated from the bohdan khmelnytskyi donetsk lyceum with enhanced military and physical training, and later entered the luhansk

state academy of culture. and arts, when luhansk region was occupied, dmytro became an appreciator of the so-called great russian culture. young sidorov, then he was 24, did not go to the controlled territories of ukraine, but began to build his career under the occupiers. three government orders were adopted today, which allow us to sign an additional agreement with the ministry of culture of the russian federation. to get a seat in high offices, you must first prove to the system that you are worthy of the title. the buyer of the kremlin, that's exactly what dmytro set out to do, he started small, became an organizer of sports events under the coat of arms with a chicken. at competitions, he handed out russian diplomas and medals and listened to the howling of the russian national anthem with his head proudly raised. later , sport for all was added to the city center for the physical health of the population under the occupation authorities. to the great happiness on in the liberated territories , boys are already actively involved in the processes of interaction with sports

federations. resumed classes in club institutions, with each year of the occupation of luhansk region , the traitor's career went up, well, it seemed so to him, but in reality it hit the bottom, because later dmytro headed the committee on health care , education, culture, sports, tourism and social politics, the so-called lpr. it is not clear how you can lead something that does not exist. but that sandcastle that this traitor was building for himself, where he is a great official on pseudopolits... arenas, well, very funny. thanks to the leadership, today our region is flourishing, developing, and we all contribute to make life better for all our residents. in 2017 , the leader of the fake lpr, leonid pasichnyk , appointed sidorov as acting minister of culture, sports and youth by decree. in his chair, dmytro oversees youth patriotic movements aimed at promoting the russian

peace. among the local and youth, and also accuses ukraine of zombifying children through literature. just listen to this delusion obsessed very serious psychological training was conducted with these people, because they even have fairy tales, even ordinary textbooks in schools, and they, in fact, raise a rather cruel generation from their children. there is a lot of russophobic, extremist literature, calls for war, calls for blood, calls to kill russians. minister sidorov travels to all kinds of russian forums, develops poor russian culture on the territory of luhansk region, russifies libraries, theaters and cinemas, glorifies putin's russian army and the kremlin. generally a typical routine a traitor to the motherland. the ministry of internal affairs declared sidorov wanted. he is also on the lists of persons subject to sanctions, according to the decrees of the current and past presidents. this is only the beginning, this is the first

result and very much. soon it may be your end, dmytro, and you will have time behind bars to delve into the wonderful ukrainian culture. the next traitor with the rank of minister is oleg viktorovych shereneshev , born in 1988, originally from krasnodon, luhansk region. we are for a strong russia, it has only such a future. oleg graduated in 2009 luhansk state university of internal affairs, in 2012 he headed the department. in children's affairs of the executive committee of the krasnodon city council, was a ukrainian official, and when the occupiers captured krasnodon in april 2014, shereneshev began to serve the rashists. and so inspired that they appointed him the head of the department of physical culture and sports, and last year made him the minister of sports of the so-called luhansk people's republic. our people, citizens, athletes, children, people of all kinds.