the number of personnel is not observed, i.e. for one and a half to two months - these are constant assaults, a constant rush, without any pauses even for some regrouping, for some rotations and so on, that is, it cannot be said that the enemy is there, that the enemy has a deficit or bk or personnel, and i know that this is happening both in our turkish direction, and in our brothers and in the pokrov direction, that is , the situation is really quite complicated, and the reasons for such complexity are geographical. will not go, unfortunately, there, well, that's it, if you say about our local commanders there, for example, the platoon commanders, the roto commanders, their thoughts, unfortunately, did not come true a little, and the enemy is coming in a rush, i am climbing out of all the thickets, mr. major, what can we expect in the fall in these directions, well, in particular in turkish and pokrovsky, that is, putin still wants to leave. on pokrovsky and in this way then

develop an offensive on the dnipro and zaporizhzhia, or does he have another goal? well, let's be frank, if he goes to pokrov, then it is not that he will develop an offensive on zaporozhye, but the zaporozhian front is also moving and our defense forces will be pressed from below, that 's for sure, ugledar will have serious problems and so on, but what i'm paying attention to today, you understand, the enemy has now reached the heights, in fact already ... advanced units have already, if i am not mistaken, entered the selidovo mines yesterday, this terekon is still holding there now near novohorodivka, but in fact the settlement itself 14,000 people lived there before the war, they took, well, excuse me, with a bang, without even razing it to the ground , do you remember bakhmut or it's the same time there, they actually use artillery to level everything up to the foundation and then they already go to the construction debris, because there is nothing to hang on to anymore, but this time there was no such thing, because... very cunningly, competently

changed the tactics, they went in small groups of two or three people, concentrating in some fortified places, and then they already make assaults, and in this context it is necessary to understand that no one will waste a projectile on two or three orcs here, because well, with of course, no one will run after two or three soldiers of the russian armed forces with a howitzer. and the problem with fpv drones, it will be very acute now, i want to remind all the viewers today... by the way , matyar already wrote about this, that china, somehow the news that china stops deliveries, the shipment of any components from china to drones, motors, to rebs, cameras, everything-everything related to electronics, now they stop shipping in private parcels, and this is a serious problem, because our whole drone system is built on volunteer supplies, i don't know how today it is necessary to react in what way circumventing this... this chinese ban, but

it looks to me like forcing ukraine to sit down at the negotiating table on china-russia terms. i watch this, and you understand that when there are such meaty assaults, when they are in these groups of two or three people, well, we can only knock them out with drones, and now there will be no more drones, and in this context, i believe that the state leadership must think, because yes, as far as i understood from china's position, only commercial cargo will be sent, nothing will be sent in private parcels... well, they wrapped it in such a foil, supposedly the fight against terrorism, because fpv drones are used for terrorist attacks and so on, well, but we all understand very well that if this issue is closed in ukraine, then there are no shells, there are no drones, what’s next, well, that is, understand, i don’t i want to incite panic right now, of course, but this post by the magyar worried me, i started looking on the internet, as they say, searched the news, there is already a message from the logistics company of the city, which is engaged in... delivery of parcels from china,

they confirmed, and that list of prohibited before sending things from china, this is actually a khan for our garage cooperatives that make drones, that is, only commercial cargo can be shipped, i think that we need to go to a slightly different level here, because we will not close this issue with volunteer shuttle traffic, thank you, mr. major for talking to you, it was ihor lapin, a major of the armed forces of ukraine, specially appointed. deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation. friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who is now watching us live, there, please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey. today we ask you the following: do you think the current system of government in ukraine is effective? yes, no, everything is quite simple, if you have a separate opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video. if you watch us on that television. i.e. on tv, pick

up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381 if you think the current system of government in ukraine is effective, if it is not... in your opinion is not effective 0800 211 382 all calls to these numbers are free. next on the air is oleg rybachuk, head of the center for joint actions, former vice-prime minister for european integration and former head of yushchenko's presidential administration, mr. oleg, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. greetings, good evening. let's talk, mr. oleg, about the possibility or impossibility. peace with the russian federation, today the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine oleksandr syrsky on the 10th anniversary of the battles for ilovevsk remembered all the russian-ukrainian defenders who died in the war and emphasized that negotiations with the aggressor are a dangerous business. what

syrsky writes: this day should always remind us of the treachery and treachery of the russian aggressor, that any negotiations with terrorists and murderers are deadly dangerous. matter, and that they cannot be trusted. the day before, president zelenskyi said that a dialogue with putin would be meaningless today, as the russian dictator does not want the war to end diplomatically. does this mean that all the preparation and all the work that was done in the framework of the first peace summit and the preparation for the second peace summit has now simply been nullified, because putin believes that ukraine crossed the line by entering. on the territory of kurshchyna, and zelensky says that it is pointless to talk about anything with putin, because he does not want a diplomatic end to the war. well, i don't think it means that we no longer have prospects of having contacts, especially since

we have such a big competition for intermediaries, he is now the prime minister of india, who for the first time visited ukraine since independence. already there and talked with putin and shijin pinn, and where we see, and we see great efforts of serious players, because india is a serious player, china is a serious player, who are looking for the possibility of such a conversation, but there are there are certain rules, if we abstract from putin, then when its parties are preparing for difficult negotiations, they always declare such... extreme or maximum positions in order to be able to reach some agreements later. our problem is that we really cannot talk with russia, which is headed by putin, well , because putin, if he promises something, it means that he keeps, that is the whole history of putin's

russia, his personally, and we can call macron, soltz, biden, many world politicians as witnesses , which putin... a few days before the attack on ukraine said that it would never happen, that it was impossible, that russia had never attacked anyone, so these conversations that we already hear in the ukrainian information space about that possibility are inevitable , even, some say, on the next minsk, they, they are not about anything, but the military effort, including the kurdish operation that you have given so much attention to since i have just returned. from the international conference in chisinau, i was just driving the route where there will be a commemorative sign that a people's deputy crossed the moldovan border, i was just on the 24th, on independence day in

chisinau and under a deep insight into the conversation with the president of moldova, well, we will talk about it, because it was a topic of european integration, european... and there were, there were no americans, there were no russians, but there were ukraine, georgia, moldova, of course, and the western balkans, and the topic was about how negotiations on the acquisition of membership can and will proceed, and there were many interesting moments for ukraine, but if we are talking now about the situation with russia , it is clear that the parties are still trying to strengthen their own positions, and zelenskyi... press conference, i just watched it, it was so light, and i happened to be on his press conference, television broadcast, i noticed that he , that a third probably or more questions the correspondent had about exactly what the kursk operation was, why

it was, what the goal was, but i can tell you the impression of a high-level diplomat that i heard in chisinau, that and... what even the president of moldova said , that every time when ukraine once again surprises the world by demonstrating its ability to deliver unexpected blows and... and to force the russians there to either retreat or suffer significant losses, then the policy of russia and the mood in general change fundamentally, because the main refrain of the georgian politicians, and of moldova and the balkans was one thing, that the victory of ukraine gives a real possibility of prospects and building peace there on the european continent. and tell me. mr. oleg, you spoke with the representatives of moldova and georgia, i understood that, but

at this time, when we are fighting for our independence and for our territories, do they not want to fight for those territories that are now temporarily located under the control of the russian federation, i.e. transnistria, well, in the caucasus, well, i just wondered, because i heard different numbers there. what such is the armed forces of moldova, some experts said that they have less than a thousand there, but the head of the office of the president of moldova said that they have about 500 military personnel there, but this is with all the border guards, and it is clear that these are not the armed forces, which moldova could operate with, a large million moldovans there have, have romanian passports, but it is definitely not... these ee moldova does not even stutter about

a military attempt, georgians, they remember the events of 2008 very well, and the georgian the leaders were there, the ex-minister of foreign affairs was there affairs of georgia, there are leaders of georgian political parties, they already have elections in the fall, and the current government, which is openly pro-russian in georgia, very skillfully uses this syndrome... of fear, and the president of moldova also spoke about it, that russian, pro-russian forces, they always say that what do you want, look at what is happening in ukraine, you want escalation, you want the west to use you as ukrainians there again, they never say that it was russia that attacked, russia never attacks , russia defends itself, and they use these fears, because every person, and especially georgians, they are traumatized by this, well... and part of moldova is occupied, and this is the core of russian

propaganda, and therefore, when there is no good news from the ukrainian front, this propaganda flourishes so much , but when the ukrainian army there begins to beat the russians and inflict huge losses on them, they sit there, but so far they are very effectively using this argument that we need peace. peace, don't let the treacherous west use you as the west has used you ukrainians, because this is a war, no no not ukraine and russia, this is the war of nato, america against russia by the hands of ukrainians, so says russian propaganda, and meanwhile there is sociology, ukrainian sociology, that peace negotiations with russia are possible only after liberation of absolutely all ukrainian occupied territories, 32% think so these are the results of research by the ilko kucheriv democratic initiative foundation, almost 20%

of those polled agree to negotiations right now. another 19% agree only with negotiations on the release of prisoners, almost 18% do not see it opportunities for negotiations with russia in general. well, on the background of this sociology, mr. olezh, andriy yermak, together with rustam umerov. flies to the united states of america and there they will present a map of possible strikes by american weapons on military facilities located on the territory of the russian federation and will ask washington to allow them to strike these military facilities. is it possible to force russia into some kind of conversation by knocking out these two? critical infrastructure, military facilities, or russia has sufficient resources to

somehow compensate for this, but not to make concessions to the ukrainians there. well, russia is already feeling it, in particular, the ministry of statistics of russia has stopped giving figures on how much diesel russia produces. economy, they just classified this information, and this is the first time this has happened, it's just very revealing, it means that they have serious problems with the ability to even provide a diesel engine, basically it's... blood, military equipment, it, they're on gasoline they don't drive, and those and the number of oil refineries and all kinds reserves, which are now burning in russia, this is definitely felt, they limited the export of fuel, they, they, this, this, this, this is what

is actively discussed by the russian community, but can this be, the main, the only argument, i i think not, but the russian authorities and russians, in particular experts, paid attention to the statement of lavrov, who simply said directly, addressing the west, that if you want a transition, then you must, if you want all this to stop, so to speak, so that the war stopped, china began to talk about cooling the war, not just there, pretending that he is a dove in peace. that is, the key players began to take certain steps, and here lavrov says that it is necessary to sit down at the negotiating table and talk, well, this is a direct recognition that the russians are in pain, they can, they have a fairly high threshold of patience for this pain. but economically they

are reacting exactly to what ukraine is doing now, not having permission to use missiles. long-range and accurate, but you can imagine what the losses will be for russia and what there will be risks for russia if we receive such a permit, well, in particular what ukrainian experts say, you often see them in your studio, they call this problem barely indeterminable, the presence of weapons and the possibility of using these high-precision weapons to destroy infrastructure, in particular aviation, that aviation, which actually strikes ukraine almost every day with impunity. mr. oleg, during the entire month of this august, we heard various statements from minsk, and oleksandr lukashenko and defense minister khrenin talked about what a threat from ukraine that we will bring troops to our border, to the border with ukraine and defend ourselves just in

case. today, the self-proclaimed president of belarus said that no... he would never give an order to attack someone and fight outside belarus, let's hear what lukashenko said. the same with regard to the ukrainian crisis, absolutely clear, honest politics, here i read and it makes me sick from what i read, these reviews of the world mass media, and lukashenko - that, and he - that, and he will give the order tomorrow, they will leave there, no orders to go outside our country. how would you rate lukashenko's current role in the russian-ukrainian war? well, he is quite consistent, well, that's how many years we 've seen lukashenka, now, especially when this kurdish operation began, the russian

media directly accused batko of being blindsided there, that he... removed the troops from there on the border and that the ukrainians simply see that there is no threat, and that is why the ukrainians transferred their forces from the border with belarus and allowed themselves to go there to the kursk region, then lukashenko did pretending that now he will be the only one who called on the cis countries there to stand by, because after russia, everyone, they say, we will fall there, and he... drove a bunch of troops to the border there, to which our border guards calmly said that there is no signs that he is actually preparing an attack, but we understand very well, and lukashenko understands this, that as soon as he gives the order to his troops to attack ukraine, well, that's it, we don't have lukashenko, we don't have belarus,

well, because lukashenko even knows the mood in its armed forces, and... russian society - this is not russian society, so they may not have managed to defend the election results, but the mood of belarusians, and we all remember, belarusian forests, belarusian partisans, so lukashenko perfectly understands that this is the end of his regime, and an attempt somehow light the fire of war on the territory of belarus, that will be, that will be... that will be all, that will be the end of his regime, that will be the end of his political power, because the belarusians will not leave, the belarusians will not carry out such criminal orders. and it is clear to him, and he just maneuvers like that, he supports putin morally, but it is clear that he is not going

to use the armed forces to get involved in a war directly with ukraine. thank you, mr. olezh, it was oleg hrybachuk, a politician and former vice-prime minister of ukraine for european integration. friends, we continue to work live, literally in three'. in a few minutes , maksym rozumny, political commentator, doctor of political sciences, will appear on our air, and in the meantime, let's watch a story about how the ground forces of the armed forces train pilots of army aviation, and they train their skills on mi-24 and mi 8 helicopters . let's watch this plot. we are now in the mi-8 helicopter, i am the one in the pilot's office, and we are doing a training wheel. ukrainian

pilots train to perform tasks on mi-24 and mi-8 helicopters. armored, transport and combat aircraft. before departure, they are carefully checked by engineers. a visual inspection is carried out, serviceability and reliability are carried out. attachment of all units, all types of weapons, this is the cabin the crew commander, he controls are, let's say, standard, like everyone else's, this cockpit, this is the operator's pilot, well , accordingly, the instructor is still sitting here, the important thing is that one door opens to the right, and the other opens to the left, let 's say so that it would be possible to enter and exit in the event that, for example, the board... lay on one side, so that it would not happen that both pilots were squeezed. vladyslav has already made more than 200 sorties since the start of russia's full-scale war against ukraine.

after the engineers, he conducts pre-flight review. must check not only his workplace, but also the entire helicopter. final preparations and the plane rises into the sky. the operator at his workplace. i'm shooting here to show what's right near the helicopter. you will not hear anything, the hepter has already been started for 10 minutes, during which absolutely all units of the helicopter, starting from the engine and ending with the hoppers, are checked. we prepare young people for successful, successful destruction of the orcs who came to our land, as well as regular checks to maintain the level of readiness of crews, flight path... by the way, this is a simulation of flight in the clouds, where there is no visibility, where we are going, when we fly on the instruments, the under-curtain panel will also be performed on

the duplicating instruments, this is an additional simulation of failure, failure in the clouds, failure of instruments , so that a person is not afraid, so that he knows what to do, where to look, how to pilot, that is why everyone is afraid when a helicopter comes at them, that is, it is scarier than artillery. a special task is to practice flying at night, it is much more difficult to fly at night, if it is any specific flights, very beautiful, but visual orientation is difficult, because you can't see, you can navigate by some populated areas, lights, and so on, plus, if there are any unusual situations, then you get the feeling that you can't see the ground, you have to.. . to navigate more by instruments, and yes, it's cool, it shakes less, there is less turbulence at night, because the ground is already evenly cooled, and actually

it's a thrill to fly at night. the main task of our aviators is to cover the infantry, they strike at enemy positions, stop offensives and supporting assault actions. khrystyna parobiy, espresso tv channel. friends, we will continue. to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us there live, please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey, today we ask you this, do you think effective current system of government in ukraine, yes, no, on youtube, or yes or no, choose, or write comments under this video, if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phones and vote on the numbers 0800 211 381, if you think that the government system in ukraine is effective now, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of this vote. i would like to introduce

our guest. this is maksym rozumny, political expert, doctor of political sciences, mr. maksym, i congratulate you, thank you for being in our studio live today. good evening. well, today is an important date, maybe that's why you came to our studio, because today is 5 years since the oath of the current parliament, exactly 5 years ago, on august 29, a monomajority was created, the people came to power, they got almost all the power in ukraine. what were these 5 years like, did the idea of ​​the existence of monomajority and monopower justify itself, what advantages did we get, what disadvantages? well, actually the idea of ​​monopolies, it arose, i would say so, spontaneously from the will of the voters, so, therefore, in the system of power, in its structure, it is not laid down such and such

a format, although it is an assumption. as one possible option, when we talk about a monomajority, it means that one is political power, in this case the servant of the people, the servants of the people, if you call them in the plural, got more than half of the mandates, that is, they can take, could take, now there are different considerations about this, any decisions, regardless of other than constitutional apart from the constitutional ones, yes, apart from the amendments to the constitution, and that's normal. situation, i wouldn't say that it violates democracy in any way, it just puts more political responsibility on this political force, and these five years, if we talk about them, then in in the context of this particular political force and this situation of monomajority, these 5 years about how this political group will use these powers and this great trust...

happened, from this point of view, i think, can we say that ukraine lost this chance, because it is actually a unique chance, when the majority was in the verkhovna rada, the government was also a servant of the people, the president was a servant of the people, and that is, yes, it does not often happen after the presidential and parliamentary elections, because all the presidents who were, they had to join with someone to some unions, in which there is a majority, to sell briefcases or to... take bribes to your associates, as it was in 2006, that is, whether this chance was used as it should have been, and that's why , to change the country really, well, it's really interesting to remember how it happened differently in our country, we remember a long period of confrontation between the parliament and the president, for example, in the times when oleksandr moroz was the chairman of the verkhovna rada, and leonid kuchma was the president, and kuchma spoke about

the fact that... the reforms that he seems to have declared that the pro-communist or such, that is, the reactionary majority was interfering with the verkhovna rada, there were different situations, we had such that some deputies even went from the verkhovna rada to the ukrainian house, there they chose their leaders, so to speak, and precisely as a result of such a peculiar approach at one time was appointed by prime minister viktor yushchenko. and there were different situations, it seems that now this is the unification of the parliament, it was after the orange revolution, when, you remember, yulia tymoshenko was appointed to the verkhovna rada, prime minister, then even the regionals voted for her, dniester shufrych welcomed her. as a rule, history says that such situations are, well, not... long-lasting, that is, it

still begins, we remember, the orange majority, which very quickly split into irreconcilable camps not for ideological reasons, but for personal reasons, this is the current situation , it shows what it shows, actually this group, most likely, generally speaking, this political group was not ready for the power, for the mission that it has. of course, war which began in the 22nd year, a large-scale war with the declaration of martial law, well, this picture was adjusted somewhat, that is, it is a different situation, but the way the situation developed until the 22nd year shows that internal contradictions began there, there were not, yes so to speak, chosen ones who are understandable for society.