to give money in the budget, that’s it, they didn’t do it, now everything will be so turbulent there that you even have to forget about it, but where is the package, who said the word package, lendlease, everyone is silent, the plan for victory, and what plan for victory, if in in america, you will not have tools, money and concrete actions, there you can, of course, talk better in closed mode about the plan that... this money was given, the current administration there should have reported on the plan for victory, yes, by the way, yes from the point of view of the usa, yes, well, this is closed information, although such information as as a rule, it is somewhere at least at some level, the congress works, unlike the ukrainian parliament, the congress influences foreign policy, so this did not slip anywhere, and we need to talk about it, we need to talk about all things, and if it ends only beautifully slogan... then that's not the style

we need right now. by the way, there was information that president zelensky fired mykola oleschuk from the position of commander of the air force of the armed forces of ukraine. yesterday there was information that during the attack on august 26, a russian crashed an f-16 plane, with our pilot on board with oleksiy mes, and today, yesterday, the topic was discussed, perhaps on a friendly basis. fire on the f-16, which apparently became the cause of this plane crash, although there is no official confirmation of the investigation, the investigation will be conducted , including with the representatives of the united states of america, and olyschuk today responded to mariana bezugli, because she posted her accusation on the facebook page to the address of the air force command of ukraine, well we have the resignation of ol olyschuk, obviously, obviously. i understand that the version

published by mariana bezugla probably has its place, well, at least we will wait for the official conclusions, but the resignation of the commander of the air force has already happened, here is the episode with the f16 plane that entered the territory of ukraine at the beginning august, and something happened, we can't say for sure with him now, there is no conclusion of the commission yet, whether it could have any effect... the advice of our partners to ukraine that we gave them a plane, they don't even know what to do with them, or there is a war, you say i entered, that is, the ones that have been set, well, there are dates, let’s not talk, so i don’t want to comment on this side at all, it is purely military, it is a war, and there must be an analysis even during a war, of course, in order to avoid mistakes there was no, but... the way

it is discussed, the war, there is a plane, that is, what is the use of it in the performance of the task, it is a pity, it is a pity that the pilot, well, died, this is the worst, the plane, listen, what is the difference , a piece of iron, what could, what war, is a consumable, what could, what suv, what f, wants the 35th, wants the 16th, a pilot, here's a pilot. who passed, a famous pilot, experienced, and who passed training, who actually, this is the biggest loss, he needs such a pilot to be in line, here in the world they were standing and offering, take one more plane, one more, and here you won't get the pilot back, but as for the plane, well, anything could have happened, that is, i remember the wars that were fought, er, and the information that is already open is, well, there was

an operation there in... in afghanistan somewhere there i was in iraq, then there were friendly firemen, whatever, one, well, this obviously happens, especially uh, once again, in war, all this happens, the only question, of course, i am not a specialist, i just have such a general question, well, again, it can be, honestly, it can be somehow not serious in terms of today, the one who knows the situation for which it is used. these are one or another means, but i think that if we keep f-16 aircraft somewhere in western ukraine, and not use them to launch missiles that can only be hung on such targets on the territory of russia, by the way, the netherlands said , that it is possible to do this, and if the netherlands declared, then they are with the americans have already spoken, that is, they should be used as much as possible where they can be given. maximally, conditionally speaking,

yes, they also work effectively on missiles, i understand, but, well, on cruise missiles, but on cruise missiles in our country. in principle, other means can work, except aviation, i understand that not everything is enough, but if we lose planes in the process, in such a process, yes, that is, there will be no difference, why, what are the reasons, whether there is friendly fire, or there are technical reasons, or could it be that the pilot’s training is insufficient, but we are still one plane, everyone, well , they will talk somewhere about, and if it will already be... two, well, as you know, they say, one is a coincidence, two - i already remember it, three is already a system, if it will be there three aircraft and in the 16th, then no one will raise the issue, so there is no need to supply ukraine anymore, let's give these to the winner of the deal there or a deal on

polish migs, well, in exchange for the f-35, by the way, last week, after the statements of many poles that we will be able to give migs to ukrainians only if f35. are coming, there was already a presentation of the first f-35 aircraft at the factory, this is a good sign, well, they should be used for their intended purpose, even, even if they are lost, god forbid, without the death of our soldiers, then they will be shot back where they are needed, the required number of times, that is, my position is this, no e expert, but simply civil, which one should not be afraid to do in war. bold steps, and if we command bold steps, what is it called, then such a command will never set an example for the lower ones, everyone will try to avoid, by the way, in the american system, i know it more deeply, among westerners, a report is written, even if

a person has made, well, even a mistake bordering on a crime, of course, when people die, yes, that is... he still writes the report honestly, if it is all honest, there are, there are disciplinary , the proceedings are clear, but no criminal charges are opened against him, because, well, listen, if there is no motive, motivation to do it specifically, then you cannot be punished for it, but i have a simple question, if the same commander alyashchuk, if it's for that, yes, what about some situation, they lost an f16 plane, that's it resonance. now for the world and affects our situation there, so why aren't politicians punished for the same mistakes, how many have already been involved in key positions of politics, well, it's just a disaster, so why aren't they removed, if that's the logic, then we have something strange , strange

logic, so it seems to me that the armed forces need to be more careful, because you will kill any desire of the commanders to follow suit, and put the responsibility on someone with russian passports, a wife, a daughter in the csk club, and he without any understanding of uavs and where heads the newly created direction, well, that’s in general, well, here are two events, that’s why i don’t know, i don’t know, you understand, you and i don’t know this, if you want to explain your actions to the people, then let’s be honest more frankly, but is it possible to speak so frankly in war, it falls into the enemy. therefore, is it possible to change commanders there, it is necessary, even necessary, even during a war, it is quickly seen that you can, it even happens that way, a person is good, well, he just does not respond in these conditions, but he may not respond in others,

this is exactly the task, but not because of the fact that the f-16 is lost or there is a leopard, no, and in general i don’t see any difference when the weapons are already... in the armed forces, whether they are american, british, polish weapons , whatever it is, it becomes ukrainian immediately, it becomes ukrainian, so, well, that’s what i said, but of course this discussion will already start on the pages of newspapers, ukrainians are not ready to use it in 16, of course these consequences will be, they must be minimized, but i i say that our task is to win, and here are all the things, here are the consequences, this is the work of diplomacy, to write, there someone will negotiate, to bring down this heat, this is the work of diplomacy, it is not the work of the country's top leadership, well, there should not be consideration of the issue of the 1f-16, which under some conditions, you just need to thank the pilot,

ensure everything that the state is responsible for, and thank you dear, let's get back to peaceful plans, because this week the national security adviser to the president... of the united states of america , jake selivan, and the leader of china, xijin pin , discussed a number of topics during the meeting, which are also related to the full-scale war of the russian federation against ukraine. jake sullivan said that the united states of america and china have not been able to agree on a concrete plan for negotiations to end the war in ukraine. let's hear what sullivan said. we had the opportunity to exchange views on the war in ukraine during the last three days. we have not arrived at any concrete plan for diplomacy, in large part because the united states is very strict. the initiative is ours, and we are presenting it, at the same time that

the chinese-brazilian peace plan, and this is what china already said that we have in general, the ambassador of ukraine in brazil in an interview to the ukrainian right'. andrii melnyk stated that the brazilian authorities did not warn ukraine that they were going to present this peace plan together with china. let's listen to mr. melniki. we saw this initiative, this new regular peace plan there, er, chinese-brazilian, i predicted it, although the brazilians, by the way, did not share it with us, and it is also such a challenge for us, the lack of it so far, even elementary trust at the level of those who actually make decisions there, that is, you go to the diplomatic

adviser there, you communicate perfectly there, ask yes, what are the plans, what will be the position, and then you only guess that they are really preparing an alternative approach, whether all the initiatives and the weight of these initiatives are needed, mr. valery, here... chinese chinese there was peace, it has been there since february 24, 2023, they had a vision about what was happening in ukraine, then brazil joined some plan, when one of the parties that is waging an aggressive war against ukraine, the main one, russia, their peace plan for ukraine is a capitulation plan, putin said it directly said that give us four oblasts, withdraw the forces of ukraine from there, these are basically our proposals, and lavrov says that two or three months have passed

since putin announced this peace plan, and there has been no reaction we did not receive from kyiv, but what reaction are they counting on, that is, their, in their understanding, the peace plan is a plan for our capitulation, in the position of brazil and china - it is to stand under the brickwork of this capitulation, that's right, i understand, well, we are with you yes... we ukrainians understand that this is capitulation, for example, outsiders consider this phrase to mean that ukrainians decide, do you know what is behind it ? behind it is a very simple question: we do not want to be part of the war, although the ultimatum was not given to kyiv, to washington and to brussels, the official letter of russia on december 15 , 2021, it was an ultimatum, withdraw the troops there, there, this will be an ultimatum, due to failure to fulfill this... ukraine was attacked with an ultimatum, that is, well, this is, of course, lucky for us,

what is called in this historical life, because there is no logic here at all, the usa issued an ultimatum, attacked ukraine, and of course in the usa they understand that this is a war from putin's side, this is not a war against ukraine, if, as he wants to position, although in reality, well, in fact, it is happening like this, here the second task is purely internal. tic russian, but basically he says that we are there with the usa, we are with nato, and they avoid, well, this, so as not to play along with him, on the one hand, that he is not fighting the usa with nato, and on the other hand, this is a very convenient position, because let the ukrainians decide how many regions they want to give up, how much they want to fight there, this is especially when jake salevan's phrase was now, the war in ukraine, that's what he said in china, well, to be beautiful, to, well, i heard english just now. this is a russian war on

the european continent, until we can force them to tell the truth, they don't want to tell the truth, they don't want to call it, no, i'm not saying the usa, it 's called periodically, and biden calls it, and putin calls it by different words, but in diplomatic terms, all this discourse is beyond us, if it is not with us, they are among themselves, you see, as they say, the war in ukraine. means to find a way that ukrainians will be there as long as possible to fight to exhaustion, one ambassador told me, who is present here, who held very high positions, well, a friend of ukraine. he says: you know, we are calm, because you will fight everything equally, they will go further, you will be a guerrilla struggle, i say, you , a guerrilla struggle, well, first of all, it can be climbed as they go to your homes right away, this is the first period, and there is still, you know, this fervor of resistance, that’s all, and if it is stretched out for a long time, then tanks, airplanes will solve

the issue, even if no partisans came out, it is clear that ukraine will simply survive ukraine. as you like, but people will simply move here, what a partisan, what are you, i say, what are you, you will simply have plus 15 million ukrainians will move, people will remain here, yes, they will go after these occupiers, but mainly it will be up to vaska, so they have their own picture, until we bring our picture to theirs, connect strategies and agree on what escalation is, where it leads to, that is, there will be no point here, and we... unfortunately, well, not because it's our fault, no, because they don't want to, you see, they don't even want to to recognize the crossing of the border by aircraft or drones, by unidentified objects, well , in general, it comes to madness, that is , an unidentified lethal object, or there, as they said in the polish parliament, it is some kind of meteorological phenomenon, well, poland, we should

really thank them, they many have provided everything, but it is necessary to understand once again... this is not a gift from poland to ukraine. ukraine closes poland because of the fact that our people die, not poles die, because of the fact that ukrainians die, lithuanians do not die. i can't say the same about the americans. ot literally yesterday they handed out orders to families in washington, ambassador markara handed out orders to fallen americans, well, to volunteers and those who help the armed forces, they are only volunteers, yes, and well, let's say, no troops or any engineering or any... auxiliary or instructors, or some ship in the sea, well , they all left here a month before, that is, i, you know, well, you can say that, i understand them, and we say, they have their own interests, nothing like that, here, no, we need just to show them on the table that dear, this is it common interest, you are not

working on it, and such pressure was correct on the one hand, then... remember, he continues, give, give, it is correct, but it must be packed, not to speak so publicly, if not publicly in specific arguments, why did you not provide these weapons now, you will receive 10 times more expenses, even maybe not here in europe, but maybe over there in taiwan, that is, the argumentation should be this kind of pragmatic, practical and pragmatic, and now it's even more difficult to do that because it's become... more difficult, you see, the narratives, external, internal, they need matification, greater unity, well, as far as i know, our institutions of power were conceived only as inside ukraine, but something is wrong, we need unity again, let's unite, the ministry of unity, well, such, well,

i i don't want to comment, if you want something... it's very simple and here you can explain that this is a ministry right away, because the ministry that will deal with our return of 7.5 million ukrainians who are currently abroad, well, it looks very strange , considering return, not only will we return, but work with them, to be with them, in what way, no, on the one hand it is good that there is attention to this category of ukrainians, it is good, but on the other hand, excuse me... and where is yours, mr. president zelensky, where is your adviser from the diaspora, who works, how does he work, andrew, i already forgot how his washington works, and the former lobbyist of dyrepaska, by the way, thank god, andrew mack, a good ukrainian family, good the person andrew mac, only andrew mac, you know, to the light bulb

of the diaspora, he solves some issues, or business there, or he brings actors, helps to bring to kyiv, but he does not deal with what the president said there now that we need to deal with, yes, we have a toolkit of the ministry of foreign affairs, and why do you want the ministry of foreign affairs to deal with the diaspora, yes, and the ministry of foreign affairs 56 was reduced by the cabinet of ministers to 56 million work program 56 seems like a big number, well, just to be clear, it's for all the work around the world, yes. 56 million hryvnias at the same time, slightly more than 1 million dollars, well, there are more than two yes at the same time allocated for... a cooking show for four months, which is done in a studio in english, a cooking show, well done, until things, there is a professional team, more are allocated, 64, it seems a million, from

whose funds, taxpayers who went to a single marathon, so that you understand, yes, what kind of union is this, you please unite within the country now, you please show justice, show that you unite here, and then we will unite there, this is... i say so, but the positive thing is that the president paid attention and his advisors paid attention to the problem that exists, distancing a significant category of people from outside, namely the voters, they will sit there at the elections will vote, everyone will be there until this moment, everyone will be in reserve, plus action, even i don't know there, if you give birth to a child, you will too, the child will be registered, now it's telegram. raised a slightly different topic, but the telegram was raised by a fool, yes, in france, and in our country they drive everyone into one, this is a virtual world, where there is no protection, then

what is this done for, elections, elections, when will the elections be, so i believe that in general , the priorities that are voiced are correct, and a lot of actions are aimed at completely different priorities that we are not told about, friends, i will remind you that... we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, throughout our two-hour broadcast today, we are conducting a survey, today we are asking you the following: are you satisfied with the communication of the president of ukraine with society? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, your own opinion, please write in the comments under this video, if you watch us on tv, take your smartphone or phone with you and vote by calling 0800 211 381, if are you satisfied with the president's communication with society? if not satisfied 0800 211 382 all calls to these numbers are free, vote at the end of the program, we will sum it up to a vote. dmytro kuleba,

minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, following the meeting of the heads of foreign affairs of the eu countries, stated that the eu will speed up the delivery of weapons and energy equipment to ukraine. the high representative of the eu, jose borel, before yesterday's meeting of foreign ministers, the eu for. called to cancel restrictions on the use of ukraine western weapons. let's listen to what borel said. well, actually, while our directors are preparing the synchronization for the broadcast, i will say something else, already at borel's statement and at the call. please borel. regarding the abolition of restrictions on the use of weapons against military targets in russia, in accordance with

international law. over the summer, we issued a statement supporting this decision. the weapons that we send to ukraine must be used to their full potential and all restrictions must be lifted to allow ukraine to hit the places from which russia... strikes, otherwise such weapons are useless. the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, péter szijártó, criticized this position of jozep borel, who supports the lifting of restrictions for ukraine on long-range weapons, which will strike on the territory of russia. what sijarto said: dangerous madness, the high representative should be stopped, we don't want more weapons in ukraine, we don't want more deaths, we don't want an escalation of the war, we don't want an expansion of the crisis in the near future. in the east today we continue to stand for common sense and peace, said peter sijarto, and as far as i know flew to st. petersburg to resolve some of his issues, here is hungary's position in

all issues that concern ukraine, she understood for the europeans themselves why they are behaving like this, the europeans have already warned, not the europeans, there are the eu countries. and hungary, part of this, they have already warned that the abuse of this right is not, well, it is not a right veto, but still, if the country does not vote, the rules of the eu, many bodies, there, if not consensus, then , well, consensus, here about consensus is coming, but there are already opinions that 3/4 or 2/3 is needed voters, because statements, you know, there is another moment, statements of this kind. the minister of crown affairs of one of the countries actually puts pressure on the head of european foreign policy in an offensive manner.

the union structure was created, while not fulfilling the obligations in the implementation of the common foreign policy of the european union, according to the maastricht treaty. what are the consequences? the consequences are a warning that you do not comply with the contract, then gradual exclusion from the bodies of the european union, that is that's all, that is, they already told them, but hungary is currently presiding over there even before that, that is, they, they simply wash away the loans. all the countries are for it, he undermines it, and uses it for himself, it is in diplomacy with russia, and these buns are received by everyone there, then a nuclear plant, then something else, and we don’t know what buns, but you understand, i had the opportunity to listen , i did not conduct this conversation myself, because the minister of legal affairs, i

listened, well... this is clear, that is, one thing needs to be understood from the side of ukraine: hungary is playing to its advantage, well, the government or orbán and szijárta, but when we start listening to hungary's pressure, it's so verbal, and then we sit down, and they say, here are 11 points immediately, and we have so many, this, strained, it's even us, there's no... you can't to do it, that is, it will be against the interests of ukraine, we think that when orbán is replaced by someone else, that will be the case, but we are talking about joining the eu in the near future, so we will have a hard time with hungary, they will use it in negotiations, they will ask us right away what is called sticks in the wheels of european integration, that is, we understand it, so it is not our issue with you,

as it were, yes, it is an issue... of brussels, but, but ukraine, for example, the common foreign policy of the european union has already been decided long ago, we will to voluntarily try to fulfill it yourself and not go against the eu. we are getting closer to the introduction. well, if we do that, if we have an association agreement, if we take these steps there, then why does hungary have a unique mission. that is, we can ask the question: has something changed for you? we are... with you we are conducting negotiations on accession, give us, by the way, i would do it, let deputy prime minister stefanyshina make a request, or the ministry of foreign affairs? it is an official request that you have changed your joint foreign policy and security policy, that you are so sloppy, maybe we can do the same, but when we discuss this point for negotiation, well, it will be clear, it will be a bit of trolling, but we we cannot afford trolling with friends. by the european

union, brussels, but in fact, in fact, at some stage such a tool may and will have to be used, because speaking of certain nuances, you can ask questions, frameworks and so on, so this is from a pragmatic point of view, and we have to act quite hard with hungary, because now they will squeeze out, talk out of their box, and then there will be problems, and this position is cynical, in told putin that it was simply necessary to stop. that is , to capitulate everything, i don’t know what they want if ukraine capitulates, how they would defend themselves further, they don’t understand what would happen, but to be honest, i think we should honestly tell our neighbors, not only the hungarians, if putin would occupy ukraine, that's all unfortunately, at least 3,000 more ukrainians would have joined the occupation forces. not because

they are so warlike, but because you see the methods they use in zaporizhzhia, kharkiv, how much kharkiv is already there, and already there, well, i have how many they have captured, and there they are already planning some kind of war they will push in zaporizhzhia, kherson oblast, donetsk oblast, luhansk oblast, they already have, well, i ’ll put it bluntly, more than 180 military men, where they simply take everyone away, send them away, that is , all these people would go somewhere to... hungary, they know that as long as ukraine is standing, siarta can exercise, excuse me, in such a word, and when it ends, that is, if, god forbid, it ends, then they would be the first to come running and ask for help, so we need to be reminded more often who is currently the guarantor of hungary's security, the guarantor of hungary's security is ukraine, and this should be said on all platforms and poked at it.