>> talk about a man eater. >> they are dangerous they say they can't harm humans they will harm humans if you see one of us in your cart you crash. >> yes you run into traffic forr they are too big to kill. the size of your hand. leave on the ground smashing a production or have arachnophobia that's my biggest fear that in alligators. >> is all bad news to me. okay. >> they drowned your first and they killed the alligators is something i don't go for. >> how do we get to alligators? thanks. [laughter] that does it for us. guess what guys you get to see us back here tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. eastern for the big weekend show. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

♪. mark: hello america i am mark levin. this is life, liberty, and levin. an attorney james trustee. before we get tour to great gas i want to make the point as clearly as i can. joe biden and entity blinken have blood on their hands. they are drenched in blood. what am i talking about? can anybody tell me any other president in american history who gives aid and support. billions of dollars to our enemy. to our enemy has killed american soldiers in iraq. due to our enemy that has created all kinds of mayhem in the middle east. to our enemy is now attacking

our armed forces in the middle east and attacking our allies for this trying to build an islamic caliphate throughout the middle east. what kind of a commander-in-chief of the united states of america waives economic sanctions. with its oil, commerce, finance, banking, you name it. against a regime that sought to assassinate a former secretary of state and former national security advisor. who does that? can you name a single president in american history. a single secretary of state since we have had secretary of state go back to jefferson. can you name one what harm our enemy? i have another question what kind of president what kind of secretary of state would appoint an individual who is pro iran. who is a marxist. who is a special pleader for iran to negotiate a nuclear deal on our behalf?

and then in turn would hire three staffers one of whom is a potential spy for that regime. and that envoy had his classification yanked is under investigation and the information being cut from the night states congress. what kind of a president of the united states and secretary of state appoint such a reprobate to represent the united states. what kind of president of the united states and secretary of state refuses to trigger what is called snapback a few weeks ago to prevent iran from being able to make, buy, and sell missiles. that has happened to. what kind of president of the united states and secretary of state arm our terrorist enemies? arm how mosque? donald trump said no more money to the un. which the un will not even call a terrorist state to pay it would not even call a terrorist

group so they continue to get money. trump cut it off. biden and blinken the money is pouring and again. what kind of president of the united states and secretary of state fund plo with hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars with no conditions whatsoever? and refuse to enforce the act. which tells the palestinians you don't get any money from the united states unless you stop killing israelis. killing americans for which you give pensions it's called sleigh for a pay to the terrorists families. so, what do we have here? then, what do they do in turn? they tell the israelis look, we want the hostages. they take no responsibility for the hostages they just paid that regime the iranian regime $6 billion for hostages. and by the way we don't really want you to win the war prefer a

stalemate a cease-fire here and there may be a permanent cease-fire. hamas is not going to honor a cease-fire they are a terrorist organization they do not honor anything. they even said this is a dry run we are going to keep at this until we get what we want the obliteration of the jews and the jewish state. a cease-fire is a surrender. and what else? keep sending fuel, medicine, food we now actually a palestinian citizens telling hamas is stealing everything. they are taking everything. who is the referee and gossip to make sure they don't? there aren't any. this administration keeps putting the pressure on israel to habitually. to be nice about the war to make sure you don't defeat the enemy just box them in. in other words blinken and biden take no responsibility for what they unleashed the head piece

breaking out between arab and muslim countries and the israelis. the iranians are in a box they were collapsing the people were rising up. hamas was in a box, they are all in a box. until biden and blinken come in and unleash the whole thing. and now it is israel's fault. israel is attacked on october 7 around us ways we do not need to keep describing. now israel is the aggressor you will have have a marxist fraud e sanders in the senate sitting they should not get any funds or we need to condition the funds israel must do that and then finally the two state solution. while this war is going on, while this war is going on the two state solution that's pushed by thomas freedman at the "new york times" and other israel hater, that's pushed by the democrat party that's pushed by obama, pushed by everybody. it was a two state collusion

it's called gaza and look what happens. but as i've said before the two state solution for israel is the final solution, why? because you need to understand what the islamists want. it is a caliphate it is not a two state solution. iran has a state are they satisfied with their state? they've all taken over lebanon they've taken over yemen they are in the middle of taking over iraq for t were they taken overe gaza strip. they want to caliphate and not just in the middle east. they are building nuclear weapons the effort to build nuclear weapons that is not for their neighborhood that is for our neighborhood. and what are we doing to stop them right now? what is the plan? what is the strategy to stop iran from getting a nuclear weapon right now? on biden and blinken's watch there is nothing to stop that which is why they are racing to the finish line because they know they have friends in the united states state department.

they know the 1930s and 40s the israelis a many are still there. i want to turn to our friend at a man who really knows these subjects inside and out. congressman michael waltz a combat veteran who's been ringing the bell and ringing the pots and pans for a long time about the middle east and elsewhere and we will get into that too. what is wrong with what i just said? >> there's all kinds of things wrong with the world. what yo you just said is absoluy right. let's just go back and look at the world president trump inherited the middle east that he inherited with isis on the march, iran on the march. it was a total mess and within just a few years he had taken out baghdadi the leader of isis you taken out soleimani the leader of irg c.

the iranian currency was tanking. oil had gone from 4 million barrels a day to basically nothing there foreign currency reserves were tanking. you are absolutely right he had it contains. we went from isis destroyed, iran broke and then the abraham accords to back where we are today. two things i would add is the same team th that surround biden was around obama. blinken, sullivan, his deputy were all deputies and acolytes of susan rice, john kerry and hilary clinton. and so you have the same policy because even when trump was in they tried to undermine him. the only other thing i would add is afghanistan. we now have access of terror from kabul on a superhighway all the way through tehran. they have completely, despite our blood and treasure it and

iraq have turned iraq into a client state of iran. all the way to the mediterranean through syria and through lebanon have surrounded israel with a ring of fire the ayatollah has complained about. and now you have houthis down in yemen that biden on week one of his administration delisted as a terror organization. attacking international shi shipping. about 15 -- 20% of global trade passes through the red sea and the suez canal. this is a calamity and a disaster of global proportions. and yet you have a crew around biden i do not think he is in charge that has a fundamental misunderstanding of deterrence. every time you see them go to the microphone and say our main goal is to prevent escalation the ayatollahs see that as a invite to continue escalation.

sometimes when the bullies on the schoolyard you can't just keep giving them more and more lunch money that punch them in the nose until we hit iran which is behind all of this where it counts, that is not an invasion we don't the media freaking out. that's cyber, that is financial that's all kinds of things in the toolkit but until you hit them where it counts like president trump did this is going to continue to get worse. mark: i will ask you this question you are a ma man who hs studied military history. you have lived combat. you are a congressman from florida. can you think of another president of the united states who would take steps to directly or indirectly arm our enemy of the strength to build a nuclear weapon that would be aimed at the united states army and am enemy ied's and so forth.

trying to build a caliphate throughout the middle east and a is taken american hostages and is funding hamas and what hamas is doing to our ally, israel. this is not even passivity this is affirmative action that has taken and we know today is building up iran. and in the face of all of this there is no recalculation. there is one that has done something like this. i was thinking in the 1930s he could appease that is why food to wake up to how dangerous this course be on truly is. the thing that has me so frustrated is i guess, i do not know what it's going to take for them to change course. we are going to have to get a ship and get sunk by a

sophisticated antiship missiles that the houthis are firing or service members die. i was just in a briefing with some of the generals. some of the drones some of the rockets function are going to i miss going to continue to fire them until they get a catastrophic hit. i do not know what else is going to take to get these guys around biden to walk away from this fantasy a nuclear deal that they keep trying to look away from and do not rattle iran's cage because they think we can get back into it. it's just not the case. mark: is not a president in american history that has done what biden is doing you do not armor enemy december 1. number two the only difference i see is that neville chamberlain was not funding the nazis. joe biden is defunding the islam

oh nazi regime in iran. we will be right back up.

mark: representative michael walt's first i want to thank you for your service. you are a combat veteran green

beret. u.s. army national guard colonel and of course you remember the committee. i want to thank you very much for your service. this must pain you to no end to watch was going on here in afghanistan and ukraine, and the middle east. one after the other after the other. and i noticed joe biden does not take responsibility for any of it. if something goes wrong in the middle east it's the fault of the israelis are the republicans. not his policies i also noticed that media from but what the bin foreign policy is. as i said here a few weeks ago the biden foreign policy just light things on fire and deal with it. he takes in place the middle east rather than follow the trump policy you are right he brings in the obama acolytes. these are ideologues out of the ivy colleges. in the case of a blinken he was of this raid on the floor of the united states senate when he was

upper deputy secretary of state fight mccain he called it for 25 minutes he was pounding the sky, pounding the sky. and yet they are never held to account to my question to you is this. they are running a rogue foreign policy they're not involving you guys in the house for they are not involving the united states senate. they are issuing edicts to the state of israel that is a sovereign country. they are telling what they can and cannot do on their borders. what they have to do after the war but how they have to fight this war. do you agree with me if israel's policy biden policy israel will lose? >> israel will surrender if they follow biden's edicts. number two, i think that would be a green light for hezbollah, the militias in syria and their masters and iran to realize their dream before they even get genocide in israel wiping israel out the face of the earth.

this is what beebe knows you have to stand firm. those are terrorists only understand strength. i have sat across the table whether it is the tele- band, t, al qaeda or hamas they all see the world the same way. and what they understand our bularebullets and bombs on four. and i have served with the idf alongside them anyway not inside but i've served alongside. this is a democratically elected government with the civilian oversight of their military that abides by the laws of war that abides by the jiva can geneva conventionsthere is a mae between deliberately targeting, massacring, raping and burning civilians as hamas does. what the idf has to go through in terms of putting its own soldiers at risk to get around the human shields as hamas sacrifices its own people.

so, to put the even in the same universe in this moral equivalency is insulting. and then why blinken believes he needs to sit inside the israeli war cabinet and a lecture them? i was just out at the reagan forum often gives an entire speech lecturing the israelis. does not say anything about iran. it's insulting to our allies. it shows their true colors it's a pandering to their political left. that is disgusting and disgraceful in my view. >> october 7 would not have happened under donald trump. it would not have happened. biden and blinken and they showed the enemy. they showed weakness. they showed them equivocation. i do not even want to use the

word mps. conventional of resources. they saw what they are dealing with. let me just say this to your congressman before the election of joe biden i said our enemies want jwhen joe biden elected president. the russians the communist chinese, iran, the terrorists because they see what we see isn't that correct? >> itis absolutely correct. i have zero doubt in my mind the eye ronnie and's would be at the table right now i begging for ay kind of deal under a trump administration. they are so on their back foot the regime cares about one thing one and one thing only not its n people its own survival and its wallet and money. they waited and waited and drugged things out long enough hoping biden would get elected you had john kerry traveling around the world telling them

just hold out. we will be coming back a inc. ad get back into our tea and crumpets and our deal but let me take a step back on one other thing. you look at all of our adversaries right now they are flush with cash failed energy policy and the claimant obsession with the left that's why this is so important it's not just getting americans hooked on chinese is not just getting our cities hooked on chinese made solar panels. they are taking oil off the table not just in the united states with places like our allies and elsewhere. that's raising the price of oil that has putin's coffers full. that has iranian coffers pool every time our advert has been

on the march with a price and will is high. that's about enough it is literally fueling wars around the world that then biden comes back to us and our taxpayers saying we have got to dig deeper and help our friends and fighting us are enemies that are rich because of bad energy policy it's most insane thing i've ever heard in my life. i'm sick of it the republicans in the house of drawing a line. mark: what you are saying that as our unilateral decision to eliminate energy independence not to use our own resources in enriching our enemies. or at least our adversaries. that now we are literally directly and indirectly biting g the axis of evil that's more than three countries it could be 20 countries as a matter of fact. the insanity is unbelievable. we will be right back. nsurance with liberty mutual.” he hits his mark —center stage—

and is crushed by a baby grand piano. are you replacing me? with this guy? customize and save with liberty bibberty. he doesn't even have a mustache! oh, look! a bibu. [limu emu squawks.] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

>> this is a fox news learn i am jon scott in new york's severe weather it turned out wreaking havoc across tennessee and kentucky tonight destroying homes and injuring people. officials in both states are reporting downed trees and power lines as well as blocked roads. drivers should be encouraged to stay off roads as emergency personnel were to clear them. fortunately no reports of deaths so far. more severe weather is expected to hit the region for the rest of the weekend for that same storm system also will become harsh weather to the east coast

overnight into tomorrow. people from florida to maine will see heavy rain and strong winds for most of sunday. some places in the northeast would get up to a foot of snow for the national weather service has already issued severe i'm sorry several weather alerts which include winter storm and flood watches. i am jon scott, now back to life, liberty, and levin. ♪. mark: welcome back america. you know congressman, when russia invaded ukraine the ukrainian were fighting and we were providing them with armaments for a lot of people said like a general keen here and others. >> we are not providing them with the right armaments. we are not providing them with the armaments on time. i responded i agreed and said what is it biden is doing here? he seems to want a battle where the ukrainians cannot win.

where you have a stalemate. and then we pour billions and billions of dollars or worse the ukrainians might lose what is your take on this? >> your absolutely right we could go down the list for another hour patriots, jets, tanks, he eventually gets there but way too late. now we are in a stalemate that's going to be very long and very expensive. so, i said absolutely we have to stop putin. the era of blank checks and biden saying give me billions of your taxpayer dollars and don't ask questions or else you are pro- russia is ridiculous and offensive. it is our job to say to what end? what is the strategy? how are you going to get there and to also question what he has done so far. further i just know this from 27 years in the military, it takes different types of things

whether you are on offense. if biden is saying we have to liberate every inch of ukrainian territory to be successful that is a different set of things to go on offense than it is to stay on defense and prevent them from taking any more of ukraine. so the strategy absolutely matters. and here's one other thing i am just beside myself. some europeans have absently stepped out. the brits, poland, the baltics, like lithuania, latvia, but others germany, france, italy the big economies of europe are contributing a fraction of what they should germany in particular despite all of its rhetoric which you could argue that invited partially invited putin to do this with this dependency on russian gas just voted down formally in its parliament its defense budget to get to the 2% commitments.

we are at nine out of 31 nato nations that aren't living up to their 2% defense commitment. i have had it was subsidizing european defense. if we cannot get them to step up now and use this as a leverage of momenta than i do not know when we ever will if we don't five years from now, seven years from now, 10 years from now we will find ourselves back in the same place. mark: this has a lot to do with the lack of american rational leadership. i really do pre-people cannot define with the biden foreign policy is. if biden has a foreign-policy foreign policydoctrine he has ay locked in a vault somewhere and he's not going to tell us what it is. they are not transparent about what it is but reagan was clear peace through strength and don't screw around us or our allies, that is a bottom line he defeated the soviet union without sending a single troop into the soviet union so forth and so on. trumpets of the same mindset. there are ways to defeat the

enemy many ways at different options. i don't think this administration knows who the enemy is. who are our allies are. they are incompetent there poison ivy league type of eggheads. they worked for a failed president before and obama what is your take on that? >> i will tell you what my take is what i think is a core on it all you read about in your book. the progressive left believes we are the enemy they believe that our core we are inherently a racist misogynist nation. you are seeing that explode out of our universities right now and america has done more harm around the world than good. you have that coupled with the foreign policy establishment of a bunch of academics that believe if i can just get the other side to the table. if i can give them enough concessions. if we can appease enough of thumb on the kid on the school yard they can give a little more

lunch money to the bully everyone will behave and follow in kind. you and i know our adversaries see that as weakness. they smell it and they see it as an opportunity. what really came home for me was in the president xi putin meeting he openly stated to putin we have a once in a century opportunity right now under joe biden to transform the world order and make it look like what they want a technote socialist surveillance state rather than what the united states has led since world war ii. that should put the fear of god in every american. this is what we've got to get president trump back in the white house. not only did he understand deterrence and our adversaries feared him, but he understood the greatest strength is our economy. our energy. the american worker, manufacturing, that is how you also prevent wars. and that is why this next

election is so, so consequential. mark: you are one 100% right you are great patriots the past, present i'm sure in the future. thank you my friend, god bless you. >> thanks mark. mark: we will be right back.

mark: welcome back america. i have noticed crucially important issues are getting lots in the course of the past few weeks. want to circle back to one of them that is the effort to send donald trump to prison for the rest of his life. this is an extraordinarily troubling event that is taking place in the united states is only getting worse by the day. it's not getting the proper attention it deserves. let's look at january 6 in that case in washington d.c. he had to enron obstruction statutes or sanctions that are being used.

you have a post civil war kkk statute that's being used. you have a forth the statute fot involves federal contractors who misapply funds. none of these charges have anything to do with donald trup or january 6. the prosecutor in this case jack smith the history of jack smith and that is why he was appointed. iis to bootstrap through these statutes a case against donald trump that is in fact seditious conspiracy and insurrection. without the elements and without the proof and prosecutors are not supposed to conduct themselves this way. trump has not been charged with any violence. he has not been charged with seditious conspiracy produce not being charged with insurrection. he has not been charged with or

for the capitol violence that took place by smith. but smith is exploiting it in his filings and his emotions of the arguments he tells his court there is no evidence whatsoever that donald trump orchestrated any of this. donald trump went into this limping because a prior obama judge ruled a motion to juggle that attorney-client with his lead lawyer in washington d.c. was waived under the crime fraud exception. it was a secret proceeding we still do not know what happened. his lead lawyer was tested forced to testify for the grand jury his notes were used in front of the grand jury. i just want to ask the american people, is that due process? >> much of this is about the first met with the right of the candidate a president to speak his mind about political actions appactions. about elections and so forth. much of this is about opinions and free speech.

and so i am watching this for the judge in the interference case will not strike generally six the references from the indictment. all of the violence, all of the activity that's pouring into these papers had been filed by the government for the purpose obviously of influencing the jury without charging him with such things. judge the fishing expedition should cause to subpoena generally six committee records it is clear at many of those materials were turned over to the national archives and the department of justice and their fish through by them and there are missing documents there's misting testimony. politico trump trump is not imme from election subversion prosecution without constitutional issues. if things the president says and does while he is president, when he leaves the presidency doesn't the protection of the presidency carry over? are we going to have a nation where ex- presidents are charged with things they say legitimate or illegitimate or things they

have done after the fact? so the whole idea immunity is waived? generate six the tac abc news was exactly what trump intended special counsel claims in his report. in other words he intended violence he intended all these things to happen. yet he is not charged for any of this. i want to lay the foundation your former federal prosecutor. more than that you are a brilliant attorney. what do you make of all this? >> out so this probably 10 things you rolled in there that all go to the principal point that donald trump is being treated differently than anything in history. as you and i have both said this is crossing the rubicon we are creating criminal justice system were rules of law is replaced by rule a person. if we think is going to end with donald trump with his persecution we are pretty far off. you mention the attorney-client privilege for the thought that attorney-client privilege did not apply for the president because of the crime fraud

obsession is borderline absurd it's a very rare exception that ever applies. but in this case every time donald trump has a privilege or immunity to assert it is a blown out of the water by the judges. the executive privilege, attorney/client privilege presidential immunity, none of them seem to apply for donald trump although they have applied for every other president in history. we are at a bad moment and you are right to draw attention to it for the public to realize it's going to be too late sooner than we think when it comes to the two-tiered system. mark: a judge in this case specifically calendars or schedules a case for the day before super tuesday. it is like rubbing it in your nose. she called the local judge in manhattan handling the non- disclosure case another ridiculous case. and says can i go before you? he said sure you can. the prosecutor in this case actually filed the first case the documents case which was in

florida. which by all normal processes would be the first case to go because the government filed it first. the judge in the generally six thatcase jumps the judge in the florida case. gives the defense amiri five months to prepare their defense strikes virtually every single motion you point out. strikes them down except they want to do discovery with generally six material. that is a fishing expedition. i am just sitting here as a lawyer, a former litigator, a constitutionalist and i just look at this and say this is a disaster in the middle of an election. the likely nominee of the republican party and if they can do this to him and they can do this in the middle of an election there is going to be no barriers to this the future. what you think about that? >> that is something you and i know pretty well and hopefully your viewers have a decent grasp of it too. it is an important point to make.

speedy trial, what's been happening in these cases is the judges hear from the government, hear from the defense, and schedule the trial date. when they talk about the right to a speedy trial it is a defendant's right. you should smell a rat when jack smith shows up in d.c. and his underlings say to the judge we need to hurry up and have this trial and the judge jumps on board with that. that's not the way supposed to play out for it most federal trials take a long time to get to trail especially if the person is not incarcerated. if is not a violent crime you are talking a year or two out. they are rushing to get this case is tried. have a prosecutor sit there and say over and over again let's hurry up should be ratified to anybody. that's not the way it supposed to work. what ties into this very directly is the likelihood of discovery violations. we saw all sorts of singular treatment moments when i was involved in the case. moments of what i would say were obstruction by the office of special counsel. we are going to see this issue

about the j6 committee and by the way jack's last motion pretty much it reads like a political narratives supporting the j6 committee. i talked to folks on the hill probably a year end a half or two years ago. i said what happened to the interviews they don't willingly turn over to us? what about the interviews where they say things that are exculpatory for president trump on generally six? this is from the other side of the elsa maybe there is a political motivation i don't know. the person i talked to said they will bury that stuff. you will never see it. jack might see it you'll you wil probably never see it. that is the system we are dealing with here is one that is going to intentionally eliminate exculpatory information. to have the temerity that the election is wrong. every single democrat from hilary clinton down to sing the same thing about his presidency is now criminalized and crossing

eight rubicon will retreat him differently than any other political figure in the history of this country. mark: we will be right back.

mark: will come back america. the bottom line to me as we have

a set of protections for defendants and due process. most, if not all from my perspective are being breach we have a protection for presidents and former presidents. they are creating issues of first impression and ruling against donald trump. they are trying to get it all packed in before the election or during the course of the election before there can be a final appeal to a supreme court to make a final decision. what is your take? >> i thinkthink that's right ity transparent. the starting point for everything is the creativity of a prosecutors may be the most important types of cases in our country's history. we should not see creativity we should not see them struggling to come up with the theory that probably won't work when it was safe to getting the conviction until the narrative they want to tell about generally six. the problem is there's a lot of tolerance for it in the courthouse when it comes to donald trump. and so may be unfortunate if you

are in defense you're playing a long game creating the record, hoping at some point the supreme court will get a top opportunity to look at singular treatment and singular creativity and shoot it down. mark: the irony here is all this trust and talk about donald trump and her friend with the election trying to affect the outcome of the election. the fact of the matter is donald trump did not lift a finger of presidential power to prevent the election. to prevent the outcome of the election. he didn't call in the military, the fbi, or dhs to change anything. he left office when he was supposed to leave office for the offer than the national guard, they did not take the national guard. he is not charged officially with insurrection even though they are trying to do it to the back door in my opinion. all of these things he claim he is, and he did he did not do they cannot prove that he did it.

of due process and protection to take away his first amendment free-speech rights b predict bue away six amendments, the right to counsel because they are forcing a trial down counsel's throat and five extraordinary months. these are all extreme, extraordinary rulings for one purpose and that is this in my view if you think donald trump is hitler or mussolini or stalin or is a dictator this is all the media. and execute people we heard on msnbc you will have to do whatever you have to do even if you are a judgment at every case he gets a obama or biden appointed judge last word? >> of august and the bake it basic in notion the ends do not justify the memes. this is a situation the hard-core anti- trump weaponize department of justice, along with prosecutors in different states announced they were going to go after him which is completely unethical, have all done their bid to try to affect

the election by being creative coming up with charges for things that were never a legal like presidential records or nondisclosure agreements in new york. are doing it construction trial but not calling it an insurrection trial. the creativity is the red flag anybody has been involved in criminal justice should be able to fairly look at this and say something is really wrong with the lack of due process that accompanies one man. >> i want to thank you, you are very honorable man you call thes they see you then. no matter what the response. god bless you my friend. >> thank you mark good to see you. mark: we will be right back. s td raise your credit scores without the debt. get your new experian smart money™ account through the experian app.

welcome back, america. i'm going to address the last minute i have chris christie is been on this network a lot and others msnbc, airport radar and sonograms and you name it. the torpedo in his target is donald trump. during the debate last debate and elsewhere, he seems to

celebrate the idea donald trump will be convicted by one of these rogue judges and courtrooms, it's appalling, disgusting. let me tell you, chris christie, brag about being a former united states attorney, i don't know why you're running for president. you don't have a small chance thank goodness for the things you say in a self-righteous way and condemn anybody who doesn't agree with you shows what ego maniac you are. the justice system is being destroyed in front of your eyes and from a friend is the target the best you can do is pile on and celebrate? you're in the wrong party. i'll see you next time on life, liberty and levin. ♪ >> welcome to a nation