israel. all of the conservative values that he partnered with our antid anti- cunning and tight liberty i think we can do better than good. we need leadership and w we need someone who knows how to build a team how to lead and how to win we are losing our country and il of your listeners would agree we all have -- our children have less afraid and that you and i had growing up. trey: thank you, god bless you, take care of yourself. thank you for spinning part of your send it with us. we hope you have a great week ahead until next week you can find us online or on the trey gowdy podcast. good night from south carolina. weekend, "life, liberty & levin" starting right now. ♪

♪ ♪ >> mark: hello come america, this is mark levin and "life, liberty, and levin."live two great guests senator tom cotton and u.s.ge attorney for utah, but before we get to them you can see the war in the middle east is widening. whitening not because of israelm but because of joe biden and antony blinken. appeasement, equivocation, and provocation for our enemies, not that they need one, but you can see how they conduct themselvesy very differently under the biden regime tenhen they did when president trump was president. it has consequences for us, we end men and women in the theater being shot at, they are exposed. this administration has gone the weak knees. they will not attack iranir andirectly and of course the

wheezes of isolationism and islamism is him and the country or trunk them not to appear that great risk.ops at skiran is on the precipice of having will happens.o c iran has conquered lebanon, yemen, iran is conquering iraq,c iraq owns hamas, lock, stock, and barrel. iran has created hezbollah andsu what is our administration doing? funding them all, funding terrorism and funding iran. that, they are making public relations move to make you think they are doing te something like the houthis on the terrorism list with donald trump at 48 hours of becoming president, biden remove them as he removed the sanctions against iran and williams pourei into iran. the fact is also when it comes to the houthis what they did last week was nothing. it had so many exceptions to puttinhad g those sp houthis ban

the terrace... apsley 100% weakness in the only strength anybody sees is the attack by the administration, by antony blinken, working thein arabs workingg the europeans. working the international community against the israelis. it is a shocking thing that we are watching right now. so i want to remind you of whatt robert gates former secretary of defense and national security advisor and a bush administration was asked on "60 minutes." you wrote in your book that joe biden "he's been wrong on every major foreign policy andjo national security issue over the past four decades." robert gates was asked, look i think he's got a lot long pointing out a position everyone of ronald reagan's military programs to contest the soviet union. when he was the senator on the foreign relations committee and ronald reagan trying to build up

the mood militarily and the muscle of our military to confrontonal them all over the n chour hemisphere and north afria and of course in parts of new york, iran was opposed everi step of the way. biden is a disaster. a disaster. and it's notster just biden.as antony blinken was his staff arh on the senate foreign relationss committee. he was director of the committee when biden was chairman. john mccain come as i put it out before went to the senate i floor 2014 and did something he never did before. it was extraordinary because he and biden were close.to b barack obama nominated antony blinken to b oe secretary of state. obviously on the recommendation of his vice president, joe biden. and he rose on the floor of the senate and i rise to discuss my opposition to the pending vote concerning mr. anthony

tony blinken, who is not only unqualified, but in fact, in my view, one of the worst selections of a very bad lot that this president has chosen.. >> mark: mccain said it was not veryoppo often that he oppod as he believed that it had consequences but a danger to the nation and service members. and that i s a quote. he said, "in this case, thisdang individual has been dangerous to america and to the young men ane women fighting in serbia. these are the two men right nowr destroying our foreign policy in destroying our security and if they have their way, will destroy the entire state of israel and leaking like.n sometimes they are on the record, sometimes off the record to destroy the sitting government, the elected government in israel focused on specifically on the prime minister benjamin netanyahu. this is a constant now.mi you see itni s to know the americann

media. e american media are stenographers for this. you see it in the israeli media too, just as left-wing as the media and the united states. but they don't have other independent media out here that is not enough anyways. we do in the united states. here is nbc news, andreae un mitchell, andrea mitchell as api mouthpiece for joe bidenec whoda she's known for decades. but he was a senator in delaware and she was a reporter on the border. how do i know?i i live there.of she writes, "secretary lincoln and the guy is laying bare the biden administration growing frustrations with israelili prime minister's reduction to ls mike rejection of a proposal." cease-fire a.k.a. surinder. help rebuild gaza and make sure the palestinians control gaza. y for thecond countr

palestinians in judea and samaria, surrender your ownha ancestral homelands here that is suicide. his comments during anfr interview, thomas freeman is a really a very stupid man in my view. but he has handed out prizes left and right which proves he s is aho stupid man. his columns are poorly written. many people criticized him for that. but he's pushing hard to destroy benjamin netanyahu, the religious elements in the israel. he's got this idea, as does blinken does biden by buildingin up iran, palestinians, arab muslim countries if you caneve believe this, tiny little israei by d militarizing it appeared by regional lysing the wholethei situation, by assimilating their cultures. peace will break out. what if they are wrong?srae what happens to israel.

as are the. and of course, senior u.s. official said that blinken begat his trip to the middle east, his fourth since the war began visiting arab nations instead of israel to postwar proposal. so blinken is a special pleader for the arab countries. th e palestinians, and against israel. good lip service on israel but you can see how they are playing it both ways. there was another one. in jerusalem, so blinken, secretary of defense, and othert are now meeting independentlyer with members of benjamin netanyahu cabinet to undermine him.depe they are meeting independently r with opposition party leaders left-wingers and also very stupid people. they are literally trying to force and overthrow work to the existingeral government in isral

actively. openly. by working the arabs against them, by organizing opposition parties against them, by going to cabinet members independently. have you ever seen anything like this before? biden and blinken would never do it to another country but theyed do it to this jewish country because they feel, what are you going to do about it? x blinken is kissing president xi a 'bout. and within israel it is working or that is the attempt according to the jerusalem post which ise fairly legitimate paper but note anymore. although the ministers are projecting a united front in support of party leaderah prime minister benjamin netanyahu, a growingu, number believe a g his days at theho party sounds are numbered so the party to the jerusalem post. in addition to the catastrophic events s of october 7th andlem growing sense among the party'sm base but the prime minister will

not deliver on promise to destroy hamas and return hostages. the parties poormber performancn recent polls. t yet the media in israel and the media and the united states, biden, blinken, democrats and the congress led by bernie sanders who put out a resolution that was defeated that israel is violating human rights and if they don't stop it we should cut off their funds. so, all of these anti-semitic, anti-israel, utopian type ideas are being put on israel tosave defend itself and save itself. and biden has no more interest in israel defending its sovereignty and borders thaninte does answer united states with our sovereignty and border. he has a failed, miserable politician holding on by his fingertips for the destruction he has i unleashed in their own country and unleashed in ukraine with the russians. he has unleashed against israel with the palestinians and on and

on and on. so i want to remind the members of the party and i want to remind members of the opposition party come i want to remind the media in israel and is really friends of something. and i think you will find this hinginteresting to the second te in israel and its destruction. there was a first time.dest that is why we had a second t time. that was destroyed by thee babylonians.the so we want to place where that temple was destroyed over time, the second time it was built. and what happened was -- i don't have enough time to get into ala the details was that the romans, of course, were trying to c conquer the. they considews, r them a proble. they had been ransacking the wealth that they had accumulate and sort of little attacks against the temple and other individuals. the jewish populations were on

the coast.k were under attack. here you have the second coming. now, the first temple pointed out by -- was destroyed due to worship, and say just aruct tribute to the sacred temple, i which is the key, to thed baseless hatred that prevailedth among the jews.en at the jews had been united, they would have merited god's protection, and they would have withstood the romans. it was the factionalism among that ultimately brought about thctioe destruction of the secod temple. what you have behind those walls were jewish factions with different views, differentnt politics, different approaches to their faith.fait they were killing each other.h t they were brutalizing each other. they were fighting each other behind the wall while the romans laid siege to the city. by the time they united, it was

too late. it was too late. the temple was destroyed. the were slaughtered.he and other places were slaughtered too read and you know the rest of the story.tory that is a lesson to the israelis today. do not allow -- do not allow your political hate fow yor eacr other, do not allow biden and blinken. do not allow your press or our press -- do not allow the united front of arab countries put fro together by blinken and othersdt to destroy you.o certainly, don't destroy yourselves from within while the enemies lurk and organize an attack from without. you or you lose your country. and the jews will be obl obliterated. and that is why the enemies ofre israel are trying to take out benjamin netanyahu and hisahu

government. and they would behi extraordinarily foolish for the cabinet members and party to join in. but just like the second temple, they could be responsible for the dire consequences. i will b e right back. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> mark: welcome back, america. you know what i want to hearto some sanity when it comes to so many things but especially p foreign policy, go to a war veteran, a very accomplished man. i go to senator tom cotton of arkansas. senator cotton, the armed services committee and the judiciary committee but i want to circle back to armed services committee and your knowledge there in the intelligence committee. can you explain torvic t the aml people please why this administration is still funding iran, still funding hamas and still funding directly or putting its throat on the foot of israel to force it to surrender and then surrender upwards of 30% of its country to its enemy? >> normal american's perspectivu know you can't explain that. so i think you have to step back and look at th aedriv democratic party's worldview driven in part during the obama presidency. barack obama believes deeply

that america is the reason for the four decades of tensions between iran and the united states. he believes that we overthrew at democratically elected wmocr government in 1953 and iran, nothing could be further froms e the truth. he believed presidents beforers him consistently the worst aboue iran and put undue pressure on n them. he the said if we would extend n open hand, we would respond. what do we get?d get a cle clenched fist and paved ta path and had billions of dollars of payoffs. now, that turn iran into a par partisan issue because democrats view that nuclear deal is like the holy grail that has been handed down by president obama, peer that is why joe biden went right back to it one of the first days in office after president trump had a very successful pressure campaign against iran, against theur proxies to include killing

terrorist mastermind a continues to this day. as far as i can tell, not a single difference betweent ir current iran policy and what it was october 6th, even as youra have iran's terrorist proxies, iraq, syria, yemen shooting hundreds of missiles and rockets and one way attack drones at american citizens and service members.ers.ey they have not recalibrated at al hl because they are so deeplh invested in the worldview thatam america is to blame for the tension going back in four decades between iran and the united states peer that has an bolded iran and all the proxies to continue to up the pressure on us as opposed to what we should be doing, which isdo putting the pressure militarilyn an id other means of iran and is proxies. >> mark: is it also the reason why they treat israel the way they treat israel?stin israel is the reason the palestinians on the situation

they are in as opposed to the plo, which enriched itself andoh kept so many palestinians and0 so-called refugee camp and took their money, used it for terrorism to enrich themselves. of course, the islamist, whethed islamic or hamas under the muslim umbrella and the leaders are billionaires and of course, pushing not a two-state solution but final solution of israel that israel is the problem. and causing all of these problems in the middle east.g al is that their mentality, do you think? part of thehat is reason, mark. a american partisan project sosn if you were opposed to barack obama's nuclear deal with iran in 2015 and by definitiong wearing a red jersey and then line for the republican party. who was doing that more than anyone else? benjamin netanyahu because he knew the nuclear deal would lead to armed iran which is an

essential threat to the jewish people.. arab leaders like mohammed, united emirates and saudi arabir who opposed it appeared what did joe biden say about mohammed who would make him a pariah?ain, again they opposed partisan politics in the middle east. but i think it goes deeper than partisan politics. phit also goes into philosophicl world view here in america. again, diversity, equity, ande l inclusion, dei worldview, they are aligning with the oppressedh were the victimized or the minority, sink bizarrely superimposed that all in the middle east and specifically on hamas and palestinian terrorism here with a view israel as colonizers and oppressors. m hamas as victims, not the jewish victims of hamas who were tortured and mutilated and and o burned alive on october 7th.be it is r a combination of both te democratic party partisan views,

but also deeper philosophical views they projected onto theicl middle east and specifically onto israel. that is one reason why theudin democratic party up to and including joe biden has such f ordeeply feelings against prime minister benjamin the two and have for a long time. >> my question is have you ever seen an administration like this perhaps since obama? it is literally trying to undo o the elected government of another country. they would never do this to another country but israel. they are actively seeking to destroy his coalition pure they the press a rogue operation under the white houseu amount of the state department like this with no real congressional oversight or input. is this not rathers shocking th you?ocki >> it is shocking. unfortunately, it is not the first time the democrats have done this to israel,ne t specifically prime ministernton netanyahu. barack obama worked overtime to

beat prime minister netanyahu in 2015 but more overt and explicit now.nist the president and senior aides a and the administration have noor scruples whatsoever for running off to "the new york times," "washington post" and singingu s they believe benjamin netanyahu is the problem an obstacle to o peace and stability in the middle east.he if they can bring down his government and elevate thad wi center left leader, we would be aligned with the state department and somehow peace would break out in the world and moderate sensible palestinian leaders to come forward as well. it is all inl insane. again, the problem in thest middle east, the threat to peac and stability is not israel and it's not benjamin netanyahu but iran and terrorist proxies like hamas. until our government respects the wishes, the people of israel, the government that they elected a little over a year ago, it is going to be very hard to find a path forward after israel succeeds in gaza and destroyed hamas. >> mark: when we come back,

senator cotton come i want to i ask you, they keep pushing this two-state solution. but what with this other state look like exactly if the powersh to the path? how would itave, be kept off ofa terrorist list, that is, have we prevented terrorist?te we keep talking about this in a superficiasul away like we are n some think tank or something but in reality practical terms on the ground, what with this look like? we will be right back.

>> welcome to fox news live, marianne rafferty in los angeles and all eyes on nikki haley and president trump to make closing arguments ahead of the g.o.p. primary. the g.o.p. ramping up attacks on each other over the weekend. no polling suggests the races trumps to lose. he is currently leading haley 15-20 points but haley has seen an uptick in support as the field of candidates dwindles. two navy seals off the coast of somalia earlier this month are presumed dead. it happened while they were attempting to board a ship in rough waters to search for a rainy and weapons. officials say one was knocked in the water and the other drove in to help and attend a search and rescue aimed at locating them has shifted to a recovery phase. i am marianne rafferty and now back to "life, liberty, and levin." ♪ ♪

>> mark: welcome back from america. senator tom cotton a two-part an question, number one, how does administration conduct foreign policy which i would call rogue foreign policy without invitingo other elected branch of government tveo participate? we are not talking about commander-in-chiefe no responsibilities here. we are talking about responsibilities that should i involve other elected branches of of government. that is why we have the treatyer clause in there. what they are doing. we all really don't know what they are doing, except they allow them to be leaked. we don't know about the envoy.eo yanking his ticket and all pretty much in secret but that is number one. number two, the new state they want to create, why would it be different than syria or iran or what's happening in iraq now or yemen? why are they so sure they will

be creating a jeffersonian democracy among people surveyed sureover and over again that sad they would vote for hamas andnt obliterate the jews? >> i can tell you many democrati are asking the same thing and they don't know what joe biden,n tony blinken are udp to peer thy see what's happened over the last three years. the world is going up in flames. the collapse in afghanistan which humiliated america, embolden and encourage vladimir putin to go for thebold jugular in ukraine.r in iran is running wild throughout the middle east anthd china is becoming more aggressive towards taiwan. time and time again, joe biden turns the other cheek. he appeases and all that does i in bold aggressors. in the last week, we finally, finally struck it back a band of terrorist outlaws in yemen a shooting at merchant ships and u.s. navy vessels inav the red sea. yet, it did not deter them at

all. they are not scared of joe biden. a bunch of goat herders in yem n miraculously somehow got antiship ballistic missiles andt coastal defense radars allisch technological know-how came fro iran.ll u joe biden won't used to be be decisive force donald trump use and january 2022 kill iran'sld r mastermind. or ronald reagan used against iran when we think half their navy reminding the persian gulf. many democrats like most of americans can't figure out what in the role joe biden thinks hee is doing when it comes to world. it reminds me what secretary of ry odefense bob gates once saide joe biden has been wrong iniona nearly every major foreign policy and national securitycuri issue in 40 years. that was ten years ago now. i so i guess you can update it to 50 years.0 the second question, this obsession with two-state solution. again, what would palestinian state look like? we don't have to speculate. the people of gaza elected hamas to represent them. hamas has been a functional

equivalent the government in gaza for seven years now. what does gaza look like? in armed terrorist camp. they took all that money and building material that could have gone to apartment buildings and hospitals and schools andng use it to build hundreds ofmi miles ofle tunnels underneath ga to protect themselves from retaliation where a brutales attack on october 7th. f imagine if it was in a because i state in gaza, judea, samaria but actual state with military, airport, seaport where they can bring iner more e arms to use against israel? remember, too palestinians in gaza, judea, samaria attacking, they don't want a two-state solution either. they want a one-state solution and they want to eliminate israel from the map. it is extremely foolish in danger for joe biden and tony blinken in the middle of a shooting war against outlaw terrorist in the gaza toof arr continue toro push for this

fantasy of the two-statee solution with some ethicalmo moderate palestinian leadership that has not existed and is not likely to exist any time soon >> mark: excellent point. when blinken goes to the middle east and meeting with palestinians, he's meeting with terrace behind the 1972 medic attack on the. he funded it. but i notice he never meets with the equivalent of martin luther king or gandhi or nelson mandela. who is this great palestinian lestleader who wants peace, whoa moderate? where is he?zy, who is he? he doesn't exist! e surveysu seat thes and you see these boats and thee people have been acculturated ti this anti-semitic viewpoint and the idea that you will just create boundaries and drop people with that background and into the boundary.he what would stop them from turning into another iran? what would talk them from turning into another syria?

what would stop them from being another satellite of iran,em f china, north korea? what would stop them, senator? >> mark, nothing would stop them and gaza hase ov become over sen years. remember there is no occupation in gaza.ccup there are no israeli forces were israeli settlements inside of gaza beforgae october 7th. the people there were effectively were effectively self-governing. and looklf-g what hamas did ase de facto government in gaza. it will be so much worse if they have an actual state with anh actual mechanism that the state uses such as the power to attack to raise revenue and to buy rev arms, kill more israelis. they don't want at least two-state solution but one-state solution.are i know many people inop lewashington, europe, when a pee process. too many palestinians don't want peace but they want victory.ace, their definition of victory is driving the jews into the sea. >> mark: we know this is what>> they believe because they tellbi

us this is what they believe. they tell us. i want to thank you, senator cotton very, very much. god bless you. >> thank you, mark. >> mark: we will be right back. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> mark: welcome back from america. as we shifted this election interference and law fair andhe all the rest, we are here with a good friend and a great former prosecutor, brett tillman, u.s. attorney for utah, the tolmanto grour.p founder, the former prosecutor. brett tillman, went joe biden goes out and gives these speeches about donald trump being a dictator who wants to destroy democracy, basically, comparing him to hitler, and yoh see this in the media and see this and his party. i want to ask you this becausey, it's not getting enough focus.wt yes, it is outrageous when he is doing pure to but don't the federal judges hear this?osec don't his prosecutors hear this?

whether local democrats wereat elected das or whether thent attorney general and the department of justice? isn't this as much messaging tos the criminal justice system andt ths e democrats in it and to the poisoning of a potential jury pole andpoll democrat cities ast is anything else? i mean, after all, you don'tythi want hitler to get elected andyo he might get elected so it is up to you people to stop him. isn't that a logical conclusion from his behavior in his conducd when he gives a speech as?th >> mark, thank you for having me on. it is unprecedented to see extensive effort by theeffo president to send a message. it is only message he's got tomt try to combat what is coming.s his policies havpoe failed. his economy is terrible at this point. so what does hpodoese have? he has messaging to try to, th convince the judges, the citizens of this country that donald trump is an enemy tuntros

country. and i hearken back, mark when he first was asked about this after january 6th and joe biden indicated they had used every legal means necessary to try to prevent donald trump from running for president again. you can see that is what they are doing. and merrick garland took to the airways and unprecedented statement just recentlyin indicating that he wants jack smith to get a quick trial. i mean come up when have you ever heard the attorney general of the united states go on national television and demand a quick trial? >> mark: let's take each one of these one by one. let's take a look at the georgio case, serious constitutional issues really. a state official bringing claimg against a presidential candidate under a federal constitution. a former federal -- the president under federal constitution. i don't think we've seendon' anything like this criminalch charges broughart against a candidate like this running forn

president. you can only imagine what happea in all districts where the d.a.s 1:30 and then the other. insignificantly may be corrupt that she had her alleged lover on the payroll who is leadingg ththe case, the special prosecur who is basically handle contract in divorce cases.case we see he made charges to the taxpayers of georgia and atlanta for visits he made to the white house. doesn't that smell lousy lou to? >> it is so offensive to those listening ever served, you know, and tried to do on her by our position as s a prosecutor to se what is happening. and let's really just clear all of the hyperbole and the rhetoric that is out there. what do we have? we have a sitting president wh o is afraid to death of who he is running against. he has utilized everything in his capacity.

we have communications betweenun the doj and the white house that we now know occurred relative to the january 6th prosecution.secu we have fanny willis and herosec special prosecutor, both ethically compromised, both in mmuncommunication with the white house and doj immediately upon launching our investigation.vest so what you have is a systematio attempt to use their power regardless of whether it is a legal, regardless of the factsnd and the law. and to use that power to set up a series of obstacles so significant that they believe it would tear down the oppositionoe that they fear would take the power from them. i mean, we are watching this in real time. and we are seeing our rule of law, law and order that we e established inst this country be pulled down by individuals who cared nothing about the morality of therali law, the efforts of e law and willing to compromise anything in order to keep donald trump donald trump running. >> mark: joe biden is behind on there.ched

the fact the department of justice and the white house involved with the national start that order to criminal investigation ofct donald trump. the fact that the so-called that special prosecutor in the so-called atlanta case met with white house counsel but we don't know what they met over which is absolutely outrageous on top t f that. we have these intentional planned leaps in "the new york times" where biden is saying we don't need aonde ponderous charge to make judgment attorney general going after donald trump. then youe have these judges. honestly, some of the most political left-wing judges i r seen.e trump in washington, d.c.,, and the circuit court and even when they speak left-wing democratsso on so forth trampling overpriv attorney-client privilege, dueem process, sixth amendment, the effective counsel, trampling over immunity, post presidential - - all of theserais

constitutional issues being raised because of what they are doing, correct? >> in a world where the facts matter, it would be joe biden and it would be hunter biden hun investigated for corruption. it would not be someone runningn for office that they are afraid of. >> mark: when we come back, i want to as: whk about this case involving the judge. she seems to amazingly get picked on all these crucial panels, which is by lottery but just seems to happen. she was appointed by biden. her husband is a very active democrat who tried to prevent brett cavanaugh of beingi confirmed as wishy. i want to focus on her and what she views as immunity or otherwise. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪we lc>> mark: welcome back, and america.it we are back with brett tolman u.s. attorney for utah. brett tolman, we have a panel that is overseeing this immunity issue and could go to the bordeu according to the circuit court of d.c. judge hawn who is reallyex extraordinarily partisan and refuses to recuse yourself. she doesn't need anyone to asknd her but can recuse yourself ofn

her own. she makes these ridiculous hypothetical questions. let me ask you this myth that panel on that court rules that a president does not have post presidential immunity, doesn'teo that mean in any subsequent administration can go throughtin the decisions that the president, former president made, and charge that president, that former president if the the decision is made and may decide it might be criminal? i might add, concoct charges, concoct charges like smith withh the ameron obstructione inon federal -- not insurrection or anything violent. nobody has been charged with insurrection. so they can concoct charges and ge t in front of the radical judge that supports them, and then to have a former president charge and hope they can imprison them. wouldn't this turn us into the third world and destroy us of the whole notion of an executive branch? >> that is right.

the constitutional is set up noe to havpae separate branches buto have branches that cannot be controlled by the other. and what we have here is thellin judiciary willing, willing to entertain. it would be very discouraged if they don't find that immunity applied to peeunitr there is ony to go after a president for decisions they make while they are president. that is through impeachment and conviction in the congress.stab that was established for a reason because you did not wantt heto see -- for the same reasons mark, the constitution allow somebody to run for president with a prior felony conviction, why is that?onvi the reason is they were veryabou concerned about the executive branch using the power to prosecute to eliminate potential candidates. what is the same thing that applies here. if we will letif somebody run wh a felony because we are afraid

of the use of power that the executive branch could wield, ic is the same going on right now with donald trump. they are wielding it away not intended by the constitution or whatever this panel decides and i hope the supreme court slaps them back.look >> mark: let's look at these institutions. e you make a point therexc. the judge serves for life, nobody likes them. a jury while selected randomly.e nobody likes them, prosecutor, well, the case of the federalod government, nobody likes them here they are appointed, too appear the attorney general that would oversee a case but of course they didn't existy el them. would literally haveau unelected cri will call them bureaucrats and law enforcementy an id unelected juries.at glissade in a democrat city that have partisan view, with that they say so or not, that is why they formed these prosecutorsg

decapitating potentially the executive branch of the person who is only one and the vice president who was elected nationally. and also after they leave office e because theylo are looking ovr their shoulder every time theynm make a decision as president she, can i be prosecuted for this? and it will undermine the capabilities of a president of the united states.his this will have an enormous effect on the way our country works. we would shift power from the elected to the unelected, wouldn't it?shif >> it would appear and think of president biden so willing to sign executive orders expandingg his power, even though he knowss it is illegal, whether on border issues, the loans, student loane forgiveness. whatever he wants, he has been doing because he believes thatbi executive branch has all the power.al that is what they were trying to do with jack smith.do w there was no case sufficient for jack smith to bring onump january 6th issues to eliminate

president trump but they are doing it anyway. >> mark: i think what we see in iowa and other places, republicans have had enough. and if anything, they are trying to stand up to this tierney as well as immigration, as well as the economy.on i but they know right from wrong. they love their country. in the sea with the party opposite and joe biden is doing. i want to thank you very much,tm brett tolman. god bless you, my friend.ma >> thank you, mark. >> mark: we will be right back. ♪ ♪

>> welcome back, i have an honest question for you. some may consider it controversial, but they're wrong. my question is this, why would the people who bank rolled joe biden can's past campaign and are bank rolling this campaign, and the people who voted for joe

biden last time and intend to vote for him this time, why would they be encouraged to support nikki haley? why would they be encouraged to go into a republican primary in order to get her to be the nominee or have a strong showing? i would just ask people given what is going on in this country and around the world, what kind of republican do you want to nominate to take on biden and this horror story? is it a person who relies on the same elements, the money people, the party leaders and voters in the democrat party? doesn't sound smart to me. see you next time on "life, liberty and levin."